Philip Roth's final interview | The Adventures of Saul Bellow | American Masters | PBS

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 июл 2024
  • Official website: www.pbs.org/americanmasters | #AmericanMastersPBS
    In this outtake from "The Adventures of Saul Bellow," Philip Roth describes his friendship with and admiration for Bellow, and how Bellow was a "powerhouse" of an author. "There are very few tools that he couldn't pick up and use," Roth said in the final interview he gave before his death in 2018.
    Chapters:
    00:00 When Philip Roth first met Saul Bellow
    02:09 The characters in "The Adventures of Augie March" and "Herzog"
    04:02 The "monsters" in Bellow's books
    05:22 How William Faulker and Bellow dominated American literature in the 20th century
    06:21 How Bellow was the "very definition of a powerhouse"
    07:50 Bellow's sense of humor
    Subscribe to the American Masters channel for more clips: bit.ly/1JmUCu5
    Enjoy full episodes of your favorite American Masters films: www.pbs.org/americanmasters
    FOLLOW AMERICAN MASTERS:
    Facebook: / americanmasters
    Twitter: / pbsamermasters #AmericanMastersPBS
    Instagram: / pbsamericanmasters #AmericanMastersPBS
    TikTok: / pbsamericanmasters
    FOLLOW PBS:
    Facebook: / pbs
    Twitter: / pbs
    Instagram: / pbs
    Shop: www.shop.pbs.org/
    Explore Nobel Prize winner Saul Bellow's impact on American literature and how he navigated through issues of his time, including race, gender and the Jewish immigrant experience. Featuring interviews with Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie and others. American Masters: The Adventures of Saul Bellow premieres nationwide Monday, December 12 at 8 p.m. ET on PBS (check local listings), pbs.org/americanmasters and the PBS Video App.
    ___________________________________
    Now in its 36th season on PBS, American Masters was recently nominated for an IDA Award, two Primetime Emmy® Awards and was awarded two News & Documentary Emmys. The series illuminates the lives and creative journeys of our nation’s most enduring artistic giants-those who have left an indelible impression on our cultural landscape-through compelling, unvarnished stories. Setting the standard for documentary film profiles, the series has earned widespread critical acclaim and 28 Emmy Awards-including 10 for Outstanding Non-Fiction Series and five for Outstanding Non-Fiction Special-14 Peabodys, three Grammys, two Producers Guild Awards, an Oscar, and many other honors. To further explore the lives and works of more than 250 masters past and present, the American Masters website offers full episodes, film outtakes, filmmaker interviews, the podcast American Masters: Creative Spark, educational resources, digital original series and more. The series is a production of The WNET Group.
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 38

  • @theotherguy5516
    @theotherguy5516 Год назад +14

    Roth was always so generous and sincere in extolling the virtues of writers he admired. If only we could all offer praise to our own friends, peers, and contemporaries without envy or jealously staining our utterances!

    • @jonharrison9222
      @jonharrison9222 7 месяцев назад

      And also shredded them in his novels.

    • @theotherguy5516
      @theotherguy5516 7 месяцев назад

      @@jonharrison9222 Which writers did he shred in his novels? Bellow and Malamud, I think, were the two writers Zuckerman worshipped in The Ghost Writer; those portrayals, to my mind, were clinical but not without affection. Were there others? I'll concede the point if you're referring to former wives and lovers. Roth, in that respect at least, should have done more to let things go.

    • @kevinwhelan9607
      @kevinwhelan9607 2 месяца назад

      Well said, sir. The Lively biography details what a kind and supportive friend he was to so many. I don't care that he was an atheist, I'm still going to say it: God rest you, Philip Roth❤

  • @brucejackson6451
    @brucejackson6451 Год назад +9

    The interviewer might have added that one of those 3 or 4 twentieth century powerhouses was Roth himself. Roth might have demurred (and he might not), but it should have been said because it was true.

  • @kevinwhelan9607
    @kevinwhelan9607 2 месяца назад +1

    Patrimony is that truly rare thing: the perfect book.

  • @David_Alvarado_Vilchis
    @David_Alvarado_Vilchis Месяц назад

    Right now I'm reading The dying animal, the first Roth's novel I read in my life. I love it, I've fallen in love on he's prose. Once upon I finish it, I'm going to read another Roth's book. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • @jbmyerov
      @jbmyerov 12 дней назад

      Roth’s prose has an intensity I don’t see in other English language writers. I can’t take it sometimes, it’s so energetic. Bellow also has a terrific life to his language and characters.

  • @alexb162
    @alexb162 Год назад +8

    Will the full interview be released?

  • @whawkins8636
    @whawkins8636 Год назад +3

    My favorite writer

  • @kanghwanlee3
    @kanghwanlee3 Год назад +12

    "Super abundant" i think Roth's novels are exactly that

    • @terrenceolivido741
      @terrenceolivido741 6 месяцев назад

      it takes one to know one. These authors are 1000 miles ahead of what passes for writing today. most writing today is plagerism - plain and simple. i mean the mass-media guys. i am now feeling how astonishing and powerful were REAL creative novelists in forming the sensibilities of their readers. but how many people read ? no, it seems like largely a backwater.

  • @maxryder995
    @maxryder995 Год назад +4

    Saul Bellow is A God!

  • @bsjeffrey
    @bsjeffrey Год назад +8

    might put hemingway in that dominate writer of the 1st half of century.

    • @huet1997
      @huet1997 Год назад +3

      Roth was flouting conventional thinking. And while Hemingway influenced countless writers, was he a powerhouse? No.

    • @maxryder995
      @maxryder995 Год назад

      So Did Roth!

    • @NoOne-tg9tk
      @NoOne-tg9tk Год назад

      @@maxryder995 Cormac McCarthy is better than this Roth ... Hemingway,Faulkner,O'Connor,Ballow,Cormac,De lilo,Pynchon are greats

    • @rishabhaniket1952
      @rishabhaniket1952 Год назад

      How do Americans forget William Gaddis?? He was the kin of them all. In fact he was too good and complex for his own good.

    • @user-mu5hn7yo8q
      @user-mu5hn7yo8q 8 месяцев назад +1

      Have you read any of Roth's works? My goodness. To put Pynchon, De Lilo, Faulkner, etc. in the same sentence with Roth is laughable.@@NoOne-tg9tk

  • @yangyin09u
    @yangyin09u Год назад

    Oye! Very gud.

  • @terencewinters2154
    @terencewinters2154 7 месяцев назад

    Roths mensch comes out in this .

  • @howardgottlieb5452
    @howardgottlieb5452 Год назад

    How about Fitzgerald and Salinger?

    • @huet1997
      @huet1997 Год назад +3

      Compared to Faulkner or James or Melville? They lacked range and intensity.

    • @NoOne-tg9tk
      @NoOne-tg9tk Год назад +1

      @@huet1997 Sallinger was great....better than this Academic Roth

    • @miriamshah4151
      @miriamshah4151 Год назад +1

      @@NoOne-tg9tkNo way

    • @lewisc215
      @lewisc215 Год назад

      They has their moments, for sure.

    • @jonharrison9222
      @jonharrison9222 7 месяцев назад

      @@huet1997
      Faulkner is too convoluted and obsessive.
      James over-wrote.
      Melville fell in love with his own grandiosity.
      Gatsby focuses on the American dream with the burning precision of a laser.
      Salinger? The beam cuts because it’s narrow.
      Next.

  • @kreek22
    @kreek22 Год назад +2

    Generous praise, but note how subtly Roth slips in an implicit notice of Bellow's greatest weakness as a fictionalist. Bellow's narrators, who are often also the main characters, are not so strongly drawn as the minor characters who surround them. They tend to be significantly autobiographical creations. This may be the source of the trouble. In the end, Bellow was more interested in other people than in himself, leading him to neglect the development of his narrators in favor of the lesser characters. However, this means that he never drives deep into the nature of any of his characters--not into the narrator who bores him, and not into the more or less caricatural creations orbiting the narrator. Bellow was never able to create a deep portrait such as Roth achieved in Mickey Sabbath.

    • @nochickennick2416
      @nochickennick2416 10 месяцев назад +1

      I agree, though I find that Roth's Zuckerman narrator tends to take a tonal backseat to his secondary and tertiary characters... made more full than Bellow's through their existence in liminal scenes between the epic narratives that Zuckerman observes. Nothing innately wrong with that, of course, I tend to crave and love the inconstant reminders of Nathan's existance through tangential editorializations of his interviews or inserted scenes of his own memories of Weehawken middle schools and the like.

    • @jonharrison9222
      @jonharrison9222 7 месяцев назад

      Roth was too self centred.

    • @chessa77
      @chessa77 7 месяцев назад

      Yes I noticed the same, love it.
      Nothing beats Mickey though.

  • @rishabhaniket1952
    @rishabhaniket1952 Год назад

    The only powerhouse in American literature of the last century was William Gaddis. The unsung hero who was too good or ambitious for his own good.

    • @jonharrison9222
      @jonharrison9222 7 месяцев назад

      And borderline unreadable.

    • @terrenceolivido741
      @terrenceolivido741 6 месяцев назад +1

      i will chek him out - never heard of him - shows how conventionally ignorant i am ... I will add that the author who " saved my life " was Henry Miller. he is completely obscured.

  • @terrenceolivido741
    @terrenceolivido741 6 месяцев назад

    i see the comment below and it was exactly what i was going to say! wow..., how wonderful. @theotherguy5516