Conceptualising the cultural programming of a mere 500yr of Copernican brainfart is a great way to understand how people continue to hold onto beliefs ie. Scientism. This was achieved by dividing modalities of progression as either archaic or liberal which still doesn't change the many scientific facts about the world we reside on. Bruno explains it succinctly for those who hold on to beliefs that have captured the dreams of many post-war generations to maintain an industrialised society.
Jonathan Gage Kind of like the Deleuze thought that a plane of immanence constitutes "the absolute ground of philosophy, its earth or deterritorialization, the foundation on which it creates its concepts."
Great !! I want to be a barrel. Bruno Latour is amazing at explaining complex structures in very lucid forms. But folks like Murray Bookchin kicked Gaia out of the window as a farce.
🤔 Gaia Hypothesis is about Earth Systems Science and the biological hierarchy. Did Bookchin know more about biology and ecology than Lynn Margulis and James Lovelock? 😂 Absolutely not, he was a Marxist activist l, turned Anarcho activist, turned Bookchinist, he was absolutely not an ecologist or biologist. Bookchin is a perfect example of how the term ecology gets misused. Ecology is a subset of biology that pertains to the study of interactions between biotic and abiotic factors in populations, communities and ecosystems, and it overlaps with Chemistry, Earth Systems Sciences and Environmental Studies. Bookchin, like many others, extends the term ecology into the political and social sphere and throws out the actual ecology. What Bookchin and others do is closer to Environmental Studies of the social and political and less about Ecology. It's akin to so called "libertarians" (lessez faire capitalists) in the US taking the term "libertarian" from the Anarchists in the 1970s. I can't take environmental activism that doesn't place the majority of it's activism on the actual Ecology, Climatology, Biology, etc, that serious, not as serious as what the actual scientists are saying.
how can be a person so smart and intelectual, yet so funny and modest?
So great that I'm french I've never heard such fluent english in my life thank you Mr Latour
By simply drawing an new attractor, he has given us (when we start the work) 4 new directions to carve our paths, instead of the old 2.
Conceptualising the cultural programming of a mere 500yr of Copernican brainfart is a great way to understand how people continue to hold onto beliefs ie. Scientism. This was achieved by dividing modalities of progression as either archaic or liberal which still doesn't change the many scientific facts about the world we reside on. Bruno explains it succinctly for those who hold on to beliefs that have captured the dreams of many post-war generations to maintain an industrialised society.
Love his plane metaphor!
Jonathan Gage
Kind of like the Deleuze thought that a plane of immanence constitutes "the absolute ground of philosophy, its earth or deterritorialization, the foundation on which it creates its concepts."
Please listen this song
ruclips.net/video/DoCcyDx6aK4/видео.html
I hope this video doesnt attract flat earthers.
Please listen this song
ruclips.net/video/DoCcyDx6aK4/видео.html
jajajaja..or maybe is good they see the vid and learn something
He's a sociologist m8.
@@yudelmartinez29
They're too dumb to get more abstract sociology like this.
Interesting talk
NOT regrounding!
What do you mean?
Stop telling everyone Satan hears
Great !! I want to be a barrel.
Bruno Latour is amazing at explaining complex structures in very lucid forms. But folks like Murray Bookchin kicked Gaia out of the window as a farce.
🤔 Gaia Hypothesis is about Earth Systems Science and the biological hierarchy.
Did Bookchin know more about biology and ecology than Lynn Margulis and James Lovelock? 😂 Absolutely not, he was a Marxist activist l, turned Anarcho activist, turned Bookchinist, he was absolutely not an ecologist or biologist.
Bookchin is a perfect example of how the term ecology gets misused. Ecology is a subset of biology that pertains to the study of interactions between biotic and abiotic factors in populations, communities and ecosystems, and it overlaps with Chemistry, Earth Systems Sciences and Environmental Studies. Bookchin, like many others, extends the term ecology into the political and social sphere and throws out the actual ecology.
What Bookchin and others do is closer to Environmental Studies of the social and political and less about Ecology. It's akin to so called "libertarians" (lessez faire capitalists) in the US taking the term "libertarian" from the Anarchists in the 1970s.
I can't take environmental activism that doesn't place the majority of it's activism on the actual Ecology, Climatology, Biology, etc, that serious, not as serious as what the actual scientists are saying.