The First Photograph: Scientific Analysis
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- In June 2002, the world's first photograph, Joseph Nicéphore Niépce's "View from the Window at Le Gras" (1826), arrived at the Getty Conservation Institute for scientific analysis. Is the first example of a permanent image created by exposing a photosensitive plate in a camera-like device. Niépce's work is part of the photographic collection of the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin.
Learn more about the GCI's ongoing research on the conservation of photographs at www.getty.edu/c...
I thought it should be labeled the "worlds first surviving photograph" since there could have been other experimental ones before it that didnt turn out as well and were trashed
Would be cool if there was a an imagine of the American Revolutionary War, or further in the past, a picture of Elizabeth Bathory in 1599 in her study, or maybe even an ancient image of Romans at the Statue of Zeus 😮
Unless someone comes up with an earlier photograph, this can continue to be called the world's first.
Best wishes from Vermont ❄️
@@EternaResplandientewhen he said earlier he meant like 1824 not 1500s😂
There actually were older photographs but they weren’t permanent and would immediately turn black when met with light so they could only be viewed in dark rooms or whatever the equivalent of the time was. Sadly we can’t see any of these older ones because of that
There were many photographs prior to Niépce, it's possible that Caravaggio was using a mercury based technique to make a temporary picture on his canvas as early as the 16th Cent. Photographs weren't novel by Niépce's time, but they weren't permanent.
Niépce actually made many other photographic reproductions, from before the Window at Le Gras. The window shot is only significant because it is the first shot from nature to be fixed permanently, but there are earlier fixed repro-images too.
True - but, arguably, can one consider a 'photograph' a 'photograph' if the image was not permanent ? I think this is why this is called 'the first photograph'. Because while, as you state, the process existed earlier, this was the first (known/recorded) time the product actually was a permanent image. So IMHO fair to call it the 'first photograph'.
We're getting into the realms of Philosophy here, but it's an interesting idea: I have taken photos on a digital camera, and stored them on a drive that's become corrupted. As they've proven not to be 'permanent', were they ever photos? This image and William Henry Fox-Talbot's first negative taken at Lacock Abbey, Wiltshire, England, have both aged and deteriorated with time, so... Why can we not say earlier images that didn't stand the test of time as well be called photographs too?🤔
this photo should be held at the Niepce museum in Chalon and not in the United States
When the photograph was discovered in the 1950s, no-one in France was interested in buying and preserving it as a French cultural treasure.
So, it wound up in Austin, Texas.
Best wishes from Vermont 🍁
France deserves nothing
They suck
Daguerre had a technique that is still unmatched. Mercury fumes are a little toxic
What a great work....!!!!! Thanks!!!!!
the method used by Joseph Niepce was Heliography which is kind of phospherous material & use of sunlight to capture the image. Until Daguerre came into picture.
Two better vids explaining/demonstrating the actual process are these:
ruclips.net/video/oAwKnpXinZ0/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/iGGSgquvo6k/видео.html
No offense intended but Nicéphore Niépce used a type of powdered asphalt, lavender oil, and mineral spirits.
Best wishes from Vermont
Apparently, the exposure time was eight hours on a sunny day.
Was I the only one creeped out by that music?
0:46 the tree at the top left looks like Hadgrid
Hey ur right
Sadly, not a very informative clip :( You didn't really give us teh results of the analysis at all. People would wanna know how Niepce actually created this, I would think that would be an explanation provided by a vid entitled what you entitled it....
Take a look at the information beginning 15 minutes into this presentation at the Royal Society:
ruclips.net/video/eTQUB5FEdDE/видео.htmlfeature=shared
Best wishes from Vermont ❄️
Incredible
Sir,
This is to point out some arbitrary comments running around regarding the history of photography.
'View from the window at Le Grass.' , the world's first successful photograph was born through the hands of the French scientist Joseph Niecephor Niepce. His contributions to photography and the sacrifices he had made for its development are crucial to the history of photography.
People who have neither studied the history of photography nor read about the personalities behind its development, making irresponsible comments on social media has become recent trend.
A photographer called O.P. from Agra declaring August 19 as World Photography Day is an example of such ignorance.
In 'Photography', the first book on the history of photography, Lady Elizabeth Eastlake calls August 19 as the day of treachery in the history of photography.
The day of treachery in the history of photography? I'm confused. Could you please be a bit more specific regarding what you're bitching about? 🧐
And now 8 year later, film photo is growing again, a lot of young people is bored of digital photo, unless made with the celphones.
Meanwhile in Afr.....never mind. Cleopatra was black ehem...ehem.
Wow, the narration bored me immediately. Felt like I was in 4th grade.
Yes...bloody awful.....
Bruh
Wtf the narration is the best part when trying to fall asleep
I think they are over-analyzing.
Theres no way it was taken in 1826 bro
Other than it being a documented fact, you're absolutely correct. Bro. 😏
Boring