Hello David, please don't take sin so lightly, praying you'll repent of your sins and receive Christ Jesus as your Lord and Savior, you know hell is a place of eternal torment and your choice to keep sinning will lead you there and l don't want you to end up in that place of eternal damnation, hope you realize that before it's too late, take care Jesus loves you!
@@spreadingthelightofchristj9081 yea, I'd prefer to think myself as a non sinner (with a sense of humour) because I have morals, and not because I would be eternally tortured otherwise.
Glad to know that you have morals, but the truth is our own goodness and righteousness cannot save us, we need a savior and His name is Jesus, and only through Him can we enter heaven and have everlasting life.
@@jesushad12gayfriendwhoallb50 You must be so sad to have such a pathetic life that you have to go to Christian channels to insult people. There are many eye witnesses to the resurrection. But facts don't affect people like you.
@Soccer Mom there is more scripture about slavery then just exodus especially about giving slaves what is just and equal without threating them just check out ephesians amd collosins. I'm sure i spelled something wrong anyways. Get new material
I like his method. Explaining historical situations recorded in ancient texts but using modern vernacular. A good way to remember Biblical facts when using apologetics.👍
@@robertlewis9132 Explain. What specifically is unconvincing? A lot of what he mentioned can be verified with empirical evidence. When i come across something i don't agree with, i do my own research to see if what is being exposed is verifiable, i don't just stick to slogans by people who i agree with unless i know there are facts to back it up. Back in Columbus's day they assumed you would end up in the West Indies by sailing west. Much like Christopher Columbus, one should not assume there's no God, research for yourself if he is telling the truth. But it's a free country and everyone is entitled to their own opinion 😉👍
@@DreDredel3 Explain. What specifically is unconvincing about Santa Claus? There is equally sufficient empirical evidence of his existence, just like your god has. Every Christmas, as you very well know, presents appear under christmas trees all over the world. Hell, even norad tracks his movements. It has been reliably predictable year after year. So predictable that his followers place trees in their house in anticipation. We absolutely know through many writings of his history and existence. Nobody doubts that saint nicholas actual existed. You cannot prove to a true believer otherwise. Gee, this sounds every bit as viable as your silly god stuff. All one has to do is accept it as truth, and deny any contrary logic, and voila, it must be true. Even turek could argue convincingly if he chose to. He has that special knack for spewing nonsence in an authoritative manner to easily duped minds. Jim jones would be proud of him.
Not quite as strong as the fact they were all martyrs. And that we can see the papacy is the biblical antichrist. Which is why we have uneducated people like Chris.
josh portie were the actual writers martyrs? How did they write the books if they were? Also people of other belief have been killed for their beliefs as well. In the 1500s over a thousand women were executed for witchcraft. Could some consider them as martyrs?
@@enigma1863 All the Apostles writing about the Witness of Jesus and his miracles were of course before they were killed. You would know that if you actually looked into it for once in your life. And the Witches who were killed, some of them may have been killed for something they didnt do but their were evil women amongst those who were falsely accused. Is this an argument that you have that somehow proves that Jesus doesnt exist? If so its a pretty weak argument
It wasn't a spirit. Christ would have removed the spirit if that was the case, but there was no indication it was a spirit. We can also tell it wasn't a spirit by how spirits behaved around Jesus. I think satan just means adversary. Peter rejected the prophecy of Jesus' death, and by doing so became his adversary.
This is how I know Jesus Christ is who he says he was. In Roman history, the one person that historians always emphasize as a victim of Crucifixion was Jesus. So we know he was a man of historical importance. Then, a little bit later in the 1st century, we have 11 out of the 12 disciples all proclaiming he rose from the grave, and these were the same men who forsook him when he was taken.
There are also more manuscripts on Jesus than on Julius Cesar. And more than 5000 copies in greek and around 2000 in latin of the new testament when the most famous books in those times would get 12 copies.
Marco Cortes how does having more copies of something make it true. There are more copies of Harry Potter translated in more languages than the us constitution does that make Harry Potter more reliable than the constitution?
continuing Plus all these men were willing to die a martyrs death which they all did which begs this question: Why would the same men who ran away come back and say Jesus arose, and be willing to die for that declaration? The most logical explanation would be that Jesus really did rise because he was the son of GOD
I guess if Frank Turek is the only speaker you've ever heard then yeah I guess he could come off as a brilliant speaker. But in the real world he's pretty bad at what he does. He hits almost every argumentative fallacy on the list to make his points.
Thank you Lord Jesus, You died for our sins 2000 years ago and 3 days later Lord Jesus, you risen because of your resurrection you gave us hope. Our savior is alive amen.
Yes, thanks for mildly inconveniencing yourself for a weekend for our sins. Now we can sin all we want without fearing punishment because you're our sky daddy. Let's go and tell atheists how they're too afraid to believe in Jesus because all they want is to sin without going to hell.
This clip should be a classic. He made the point for the authenticity of the Bible that is just difficult to refute because how it was written goes against man's very nature of vanity and pride.
Here, I'll refute it for you: The story was meant for the glorification of JESUS. For that purpose, any of his disciples may be described unflatteringly, if it makes the story more believable. The points he makes about the tomb are ridiculously foolish, since Aramithea isn't mentioned in any single document except the Bible, including contemporary secular and Jewish documents. Kind of strange for a town housing a member of the Jewish leadership, unless he was fictional of course (which would also explain why the tomb was never actually found). The guard (who wasn't explicitly said to be Roman, btw) could've used Occam's razor to make the following deductions: 1) I fell asleep guarding a tomb with a body inside. 2) I woke up and found the door open and the tomb empty. 3) let's eliminate the impossible, Sherlock Holmes style: since dead people coming to life has never happened and will never happen, it's safe to assume that this dead guy didn't magically come back to life either. 4) that means someone who could open a tomb (i.e a human or multiple humans) came and stole the body. 5) the only humans who'd want to steal this guy's body are his followers. Case closed. A bunch of Jesus's followers not believing he came back from the dead is also very easy to explain: the "resurrected" Jesus was a fraud. That's why his closest disciples spent a whole day with "him" without recognizing him until he told them who he "is", and why some of them needed extra "convincing" that it really was Jesus.
The only real point here is that people wouldn't make themselves look bad. But people do, especially if it furthers their own agenda, or just want to protect someone, or even if they are trying to suck up to someone, they'll make themselves look bad to make that person better.
Truly love your teaching Mr.Turek. Really helps me see things in a new perspective :] Why can't these comments just be disabled, of course atheist would happily be closed minded and dismiss all of this. No one wants to read your rants about how much YOU think God isn't real -.-.
Let them speak. I will say it like this: the servants said to the master "let us take out the tares." And the master replied "don't as you may hurt the good wheat"."The tares will be dealt with during the harvest. Blessings sister.
Unbelievers will always hear but not believe in their hearts because God hardened their hearts like with pharaohs heart with Moses. I'm greatful everyday that God lifted up my hardened heart years back. I pray for those to yet unharden their hearts and prayfor God to lift them out in His perfect sovereign timing and grace!
willzer808 Then go away. I see you post the same "disliked" in other of his videos. MOVE ON! Don't you have something else better to do with your time if you hate the message so much?
Actually my friend this is a prophetic verse wich did occure in the babylonian siege. This verse was fulfilled when Jerusalem was besieged by Vespasian and Titus and in the time of Hadrian. Josephus gives us a most shocking relation of a woman eating her own son. You can see this happening again in 2 Kings 6:26-29 when Samaria was beseiged from Syrians. Bible is not stories written from people is the Word of God.
his body shall not remain all night on the tree, but you shall bury him the same day, for a hanged man is cursed by God. You shall not defile your land that the LORD your God is giving you for an inheritance. Deuteronomy 21:23
Amen! He loved us even though we were sinners and loves the unbelievers in the world even though they are sinners. Cool & Great Exposition !! Love u mannn! 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
Smites me to the heart to learn that even with the physical Jesus standing right before them the Disciples still doubted. But then atheists make it appear as though it is physical proof they need to believe. They couldn’t be more deluded, I’m sorry to say.
The first reporter didn't say anything about the crime partner. That doesn't mean, the crime wasn't committed. It's like the gossip grapevine. One person says one thing but by the time it gets to the 10th person, the story has changed.It doesn't mean it didn't happen. It means, it was told by 4 different perspectives
In 2020 the best way to talk to non believers is to go to atheist RUclips channels and interact with them in the comment section . I challenge everyone to it . you will make a difference. God bless.
Indeed. Having a conversation with someone who knows how to think for himself will challenge you intellectually, therefore forcing you to make a difference in the way you see the world.
GOD IS GREAT. Add to this that the Bible was written by different people and different time is one thing,but having every prophecy come true so far and rest as well will come true is another. I am almost sure that every person who denies Jesus as God and refuse to accept God as creator has not studied the Bible and i mean really studied the Scripture. Not one person who really wanted to know God has not come to meet the Lord. Never seen it. Any who. Jesus is my Lord and i pray that others would really strive to find Him. His LOVE is GREAT . GOD BLESS.
@DeaconDeZ "One person says one thing but by the time it gets to the 10th person, the story has changed.It doesn't mean it didn't happen." Excuse me... but if the story has changed, then it absolutely means it didn't happen. That's what "changed" means. If the original story was accurate, then deviations from it did not happen. You'll find that the gospels differ in so profound ways that "perspectives" is a hopelessly inadequate excuse. You don't forget to mention zombie invasions.
David James no! It shows that millions are still ignorant to the holy bible & holy men who were chosen by God trying to warn us we need a saviour, to repent, be baptised & follow Jesus! Thank God for the bible 📖❤️🙏🏽
Outside the Bible, Jesus is also mentioned by his near-contemporaries. Extra-Biblical and secular writers (many hostile) point to Jesus' existence, including the Roman writings of Tacitus, Seutonius, Thallus and Pliny, and the Jewish writings of Josephus and the Talmud. Consider the chronicle of Cornelius Tacitus (55 to 117 A.D.). Tacitus was a Roman statesman and historian. Google "fulfilled bible prophecies" for more evidence. Don't let others think for you. Do the reserach, it's worth it
may God bless you and add the numbers of your days so you can bless others by teaching the Word of God... also please for me cuz i have stuggles in faith....
Well watching a man who hides the fact that the Bible was written by anonymous authors decades after the event happened probably won’t help your faith lmao
Wow! Incredible evidence! So then it must be true! If only we used this method more often to know what is true... Instead of all of science and probability theory..
@ Matthew Hondra: First setting aside that there is a reason your name is Matthew, and not Nero, Vespasian or Tiberius (those are name s we give to our dogs - we call our sons Matthew, John, Andrew, Stephen, Peter) let's begin. And what science and probability theory would you like to see? Tell you what, when you can walk through and explain to all of us the complete proof of Fermat's Last Therorem, THEN you have a snowball's chance in hell of possibly following a pure logical proof of scripture. Even then I suspect that any such proof of scripture amd God would be ORDINAL orders of magnitude (and if you don't know what this means, you get to shut your mouth about science from here on out) more complex and interconnected than the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. And after all is said and done, you'll have to contend with Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem. Now you mentioned probability theory. I assume you have a working definition of what "random" means before we get started? And assuming you do (and that would be a publishable result) the I'd ask what underlying probability distribution(s) you propose to use to assess the likelihood of biblical truths, and how you arrived at them. Just understand that since history is NOT a repeatable experiment, the classical laboratory "scientific method" will NOT be available to you. The consequences of this are that (a) Bayesian methods of fine-tuning your prior and posterior distributions will fail on commencement, and (b) calibration of ANY such distribution is impossible, as every dataset consists simply of a single observation, since you will need to both assume and deny stochastic independence, at the same time! No, the best standard of proof you can hope for for scripture is ONE of the two methdologies available to us these days: criminal court and civil court. The Case for Christ on a civil court standard is a virtual slam-dunk. You are stuck with the methods of criminal court. The court asks for evidence. We provide the bible. The defence provides ZERO evidence to the court to refute the case that God and scripture represent truth, and i stead claims our evidence is invalid, and challenges us to prove our evidence is admissible. Atheists' court methodology is so pathetically weak I sincerely hope to NEVER be defended in court by an atheist! They SUCK at the whole process. Well, except for those who have yet to see these arguments, and be given the evidence and supporting documents. But someone like Richard Carrier is too useless at critical analytic reasoning for me even to interview as staff in any kind of complex regulatory analytical function.
Another good point to the religious atheist, that if everybody started living their way and by their principal ,their would be chaos and destruction . Only imagine if everybody started living what Jesus taught . Come on. He never took glory for Himself ,he never wanted any money or gold. Think please.
@asgardian001 (3) Feel free to explain to me like an ADULT these two things: So appearantly I can't ask you to pay attention to a guy like Turek that holds a lecture, because then I would be appealing to authority, and since I'm not allowed to do that, it makes you perfectly entitled to insult Turek and spew condescending remarks because that's how it goes by default. Nice. And then you assume that THIS point Turek made, is suppose to prove the ENTIRE TRUTHFULNESS of these scriptures. Why?
@DeaconDeZ It's interesting how you mention the grapevine in the same breath though, because the grapevine is a much better analogy of how the gospels came to be. This completely destroys the idea of "perspectives" at all, as people a step or two down the chain really have zero knowledge of the original events and can't begin to judge what's true or not. Which is why hearsay is thrown out as evidence in courts and the scientific method.
@asgardian001 [I never said anything about the entire truthfulness of the scriptures only that Turek's reasoning was flawed.] This is the problem: you're saying that Turek's reasoning is flawed, because you have decided that he expects you to believe these Bible stories are true because they are embarrasing to the authors. No. He's giving you GOOD REASONS to DISMISS them as wishfulthinking stories. It might put you in a more neutral position to begin with. Instead of being biggotred and biased.
Satan in Hebrew means adversary. So basically Yeshua said don't be my adversary and get behind me because you don't want to be in front of him especially the day of the wrath.
Would a writer of fiction make up so many characters with the same name, like Mary? Would a writer of fiction pen that confusing stuff in Romans about circumcision and uncircumcision?
The Lord thy God is One God and you shall love Him with all your heart strength and mind, that is the greatest commandment. You should also love thy neighbour as yourself.
"As long as sin exist, the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ will always be relevant."
I best go on a sin binge then, I don't want to see you guys go out of business
Hello David, please don't take sin so lightly, praying you'll repent of your sins and receive Christ Jesus as your Lord and Savior, you know hell is a place of eternal torment and your choice to keep sinning will lead you there and l don't want you to end up in that place of eternal damnation, hope you realize that before it's too late, take care Jesus loves you!
@@spreadingthelightofchristj9081 yea, I'd prefer to think myself as a non sinner (with a sense of humour) because I have morals, and not because I would be eternally tortured otherwise.
Glad to know that you have morals, but the truth is our own goodness and righteousness cannot save us, we need a savior and His name is Jesus, and only through Him can we enter heaven and have everlasting life.
@@spreadingthelightofchristj9081 well that must be a bummer for all the great souls who lived before jesus was born.
Frank is really fired up at this lecture!
One of his all time best.
I know it must be so sad that there is not a single eyewitness to the resurrection making his entire point moot.
@@jesushad12gayfriendwhoallb50 You must be so sad to have such a pathetic life that you have to go to Christian channels to insult people.
There are many eye witnesses to the resurrection. But facts don't affect people like you.
If I only knew this channel actually existed in 2009, It would've saved me years of wasting time on unimportant channels!
@Soccer Mom there is more scripture about slavery then just exodus especially about giving slaves what is just and equal without threating them just check out ephesians amd collosins. I'm sure i spelled something wrong anyways. Get new material
yeah man
Same here.
He is highly effective.
And I did in 2020 😭
@@e.l.243 highly effective at hiding the fact that the gospels were written by anonymous authors decades after the events happened.
wow, this was funny, emotional, AND intelligent!
Funny? Sure.
Intelligent? Hahaha no!
Emotional? To nutcases perhaps!
Spewing silly stories under the guise of knowledge? Paycheck!
I like his method. Explaining historical situations recorded in ancient texts but using modern vernacular. A good way to remember Biblical facts when using apologetics.👍
@@DreDredel3 still a bunch of unconvincing nonsense. Why not get a real job instead of preying on weak minds?
@@robertlewis9132 Explain. What specifically is unconvincing? A lot of what he mentioned can be verified with empirical evidence. When i come across something i don't agree with, i do my own research to see if what is being exposed is verifiable, i don't just stick to slogans by people who i agree with unless i know there are facts to back it up. Back in Columbus's day they assumed you would end up in the West Indies by sailing west. Much like Christopher Columbus, one should not assume there's no God, research for yourself if he is telling the truth. But it's a free country and everyone is entitled to their own opinion 😉👍
@@DreDredel3 Explain. What specifically is unconvincing about Santa Claus? There is equally sufficient empirical evidence of his existence, just like your god has. Every Christmas, as you very well know, presents appear under christmas trees all over the world. Hell, even norad tracks his movements. It has been reliably predictable year after year. So predictable that his followers place trees in their house in anticipation. We absolutely know through many writings of his history and existence. Nobody doubts that saint nicholas actual existed. You cannot prove to a true believer otherwise.
Gee, this sounds every bit as viable as your silly god stuff. All one has to do is accept it as truth, and deny any contrary logic, and voila, it must be true.
Even turek could argue convincingly if he chose to. He has that special knack for spewing nonsence in an authoritative manner to easily duped minds. Jim jones would be proud of him.
The one video of Frank, that I love to watch it over and over again...
I know the stupidity really is entertaining
Fantastic. Of all the apologetics I have studied, this is a new one on me.
Its nonsense.......
@@ChrisDied says the Catholic educated kid.
Not quite as strong as the fact they were all martyrs. And that we can see the papacy is the biblical antichrist. Which is why we have uneducated people like Chris.
josh portie were the actual writers martyrs? How did they write the books if they were? Also people of other belief have been killed for their beliefs as well. In the 1500s over a thousand women were executed for witchcraft. Could some consider them as martyrs?
@@enigma1863 All the Apostles writing about the Witness of Jesus and his miracles were of course before they were killed. You would know that if you actually looked into it for once in your life.
And the Witches who were killed, some of them may have been killed for something they didnt do but their were evil women amongst those who were falsely accused. Is this an argument that you have that somehow proves that Jesus doesnt exist? If so its a pretty weak argument
Thanks!
Nice Sermon. Please Keep up the good work.
The disciples faults have always given me comfort, if they made mistakes when walking with Christ I can cut myself some slack.
God did not call the qualified... He qualified the called.
@@cherieserrao9671 Amem
Don't say doing wrong is ok...
Christ wasnt calling peter satan. He was talking to satan who was speaking thru peter
Its spirit behind. Ephesians 6 spiritual battle
It wasn't a spirit.
Christ would have removed the spirit if that was the case, but there was no indication it was a spirit.
We can also tell it wasn't a spirit by how spirits behaved around Jesus.
I think satan just means adversary. Peter rejected the prophecy of Jesus' death, and by doing so became his adversary.
@@bro6117 it is all nonsense......
@Kath Beck Because we give place unto wrath, What's worse, to be got by us, or to be got by God?
@@ChrisDied Then you, ve never really read it.
"... appeared to Charlton Heston..." very funny! Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior! Read the Bible with your family and evangelize the world!
Read the book written by anonymous authors decades after the event happened in a entire different language.
excellent and common sense - truth!! thanks Dr.
This is how I know Jesus Christ is who he says he was. In Roman history, the one person that historians always emphasize as a victim of Crucifixion was Jesus. So we know he was a man of historical importance. Then, a little bit later in the 1st century, we have 11 out of the 12 disciples all proclaiming he rose from the grave, and these were the same men who forsook him when he was taken.
There are also more manuscripts on Jesus than on Julius Cesar. And more than 5000 copies in greek and around 2000 in latin of the new testament when the most famous books in those times would get 12 copies.
Marco Cortes how does having more copies of something make it true. There are more copies of Harry Potter translated in more languages than the us constitution does that make Harry Potter more reliable than the constitution?
enigma1863 I’m saying cause it couldn’t have chosen a better time. It was the prefect moment when the Big boom in civilization started.
So people who followed a criminal were executed. Wow such good evidence Lmao.
continuing
Plus all these men were willing to die a martyrs death which they all did which begs this question: Why would the same men who ran away come back and say Jesus arose, and be willing to die for that declaration? The most logical explanation would be that Jesus really did rise because he was the son of GOD
Thank you for your great lesson. Continue to teach us brother.
This is priceless Frank! Thank you. 🙂
I LOVE YOU!!!
Encouraging and funny at the same time.
God bless you brother!
Man Frank Turek is a brilliant speaker.
He never speaks. He screams like a housewife scared to death by mice.
I guess if Frank Turek is the only speaker you've ever heard then yeah I guess he could come off as a brilliant speaker.
But in the real world he's pretty bad at what he does. He hits almost every argumentative fallacy on the list to make his points.
Thank you Lord Jesus, You died for our sins 2000 years ago and 3 days later Lord Jesus, you risen because of your resurrection you gave us hope. Our savior is alive amen.
Yes, thanks for mildly inconveniencing yourself for a weekend for our sins. Now we can sin all we want without fearing punishment because you're our sky daddy. Let's go and tell atheists how they're too afraid to believe in Jesus because all they want is to sin without going to hell.
That actually makes sense. Great talk!
Until you actually do research then his entire point is moot
This is New. Thank u Frank. Love from India.
Oldie but goody. Thank you, Frank. Thank You, Lord Jesus. ❤️❤️❤️
wow im loving this.
Frank brought the fire
God bless you pastor... from India
If embarrassing details lend the story credibility for you then the fact that Muhammad was a pedophile should make you lean heavily to Islam.
Frank always opens my mind in so many ways... thank you preacher.
Brilliant! Thank you
Awesome. Wow. A nice way to preach the truth.
This clip should be a classic. He made the point for the authenticity of the Bible that is just difficult to refute because how it was written goes against man's very nature of vanity and pride.
Here, I'll refute it for you:
The story was meant for the glorification of JESUS. For that purpose, any of his disciples may be described unflatteringly, if it makes the story more believable. The points he makes about the tomb are ridiculously foolish, since Aramithea isn't mentioned in any single document except the Bible, including contemporary secular and Jewish documents. Kind of strange for a town housing a member of the Jewish leadership, unless he was fictional of course (which would also explain why the tomb was never actually found). The guard (who wasn't explicitly said to be Roman, btw) could've used Occam's razor to make the following deductions:
1) I fell asleep guarding a tomb with a body inside.
2) I woke up and found the door open and the tomb empty.
3) let's eliminate the impossible, Sherlock Holmes style: since dead people coming to life has never happened and will never happen, it's safe to assume that this dead guy didn't magically come back to life either.
4) that means someone who could open a tomb (i.e a human or multiple humans) came and stole the body.
5) the only humans who'd want to steal this guy's body are his followers. Case closed.
A bunch of Jesus's followers not believing he came back from the dead is also very easy to explain: the "resurrected" Jesus was a fraud. That's why his closest disciples spent a whole day with "him" without recognizing him until he told them who he "is", and why some of them needed extra "convincing" that it really was Jesus.
The only real point here is that people wouldn't make themselves look bad.
But people do, especially if it furthers their own agenda, or just want to protect someone, or even if they are trying to suck up to someone, they'll make themselves look bad to make that person better.
I love Frank! He helps me understand better ❤️❤️
Glory to Lord Jesus I left his name up high. Amen
Truly love your teaching Mr.Turek. Really helps me see things in a new perspective :] Why can't these comments just be disabled, of course atheist would happily be closed minded and dismiss all of this. No one wants to read your rants about how much YOU think God isn't real -.-.
Let them speak. I will say it like this: the servants said to the master "let us take out the tares." And the master replied "don't as you may hurt the good wheat"."The tares will be dealt with during the harvest. Blessings sister.
Unbelievers will always hear but not believe in their hearts because God hardened their hearts like with pharaohs heart with Moses. I'm greatful everyday that God lifted up my hardened heart years back. I pray for those to yet unharden their hearts and prayfor God to lift them out in His perfect sovereign timing and grace!
This does make me wonder if Calvinism is true about certain people only being chosen.
I like your teaching style!
Yeah shouting bullshit at people.
willzer808 Says the atheist.That has no rebuttal to his claims.
willzer808 Then go away. I see you post the same "disliked" in other of his videos. MOVE ON! Don't you have something else better to do with your time if you hate the message so much?
The used car salesman technique.
Sorry, sorry, sorry. That’s not fair to used car salesmen.
As usual, amazing video, Frank! I hope one day I can do the same!
Actually my friend this is a prophetic verse wich did occure in the babylonian siege. This verse was fulfilled when Jerusalem was besieged by Vespasian and Titus and in the time of Hadrian. Josephus gives us a most shocking relation of a woman eating her own son. You can see this happening again in 2 Kings 6:26-29 when Samaria was beseiged from Syrians.
Bible is not stories written from people is the Word of God.
This is so good.
Glad it was recommended 12 years later. LOL.
My faith soared like a rocket when I heard his speech. Wow... our faith is not blind but perfect.
WOW 🤷♂️ what a way to explain away the false accusations about the New Testament, the true word of God 👏👏 awesome 💪🏽📖❤️🇬🇧
THE BIBLE : WORD OF GOD WRITTEN BY MEN, TOTALLY TRUTH ON BOTH ASPECTS SHOWING OUR IMPERFECTIONS AND GOD'S LOVE
his body shall not remain all night on the tree, but you shall bury him the same day, for a hanged man is cursed by God. You shall not defile your land that the LORD your God is giving you for an inheritance.
Deuteronomy 21:23
Amen! He loved us even though we were sinners and loves the unbelievers in the world even though they are sinners. Cool & Great Exposition !! Love u mannn! 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
Man! 😂😂😂 you made me shed tears!
Oh I really love this!!
Where can I find the whole service
God Bless You Frank !!!
Some undeniable points....
Can you please point out what parts the author himself wrote that was embarrassing? We don’t even know who wrote the four gospels.
And we're fairly sure they used fake names. It'd never be traced back to them.
hello! unfortunately this is no longer available for purchase.
I love this break down.
Wonderful, what a view, it only strengthens my faith. Thank you, sir.
frank was energetic in his earlier videos
I do wonder why no other historian noticed the zombie apocalypse during jesus crucifixion
Omg by best 10 mins in RUclips
@asgardian001, could you name me the Historian or scribe who lived during Jesus time? and where can I get his documentation of history?
Smites me to the heart to learn that even with the physical Jesus standing right before them the Disciples still doubted. But then atheists make it appear as though it is physical proof they need to believe. They couldn’t be more deluded, I’m sorry to say.
Very good. Praise God. Thanks.
Aside from value of these words, its preety good standup.
Good message!
Good job, wish i ve seen it earlier
Just great! Thank you JESUS!!!
Great stuff. 😎
I love frank so much LOL!
The first reporter didn't say anything about the crime partner. That doesn't mean, the crime wasn't committed. It's like the gossip grapevine. One person says one thing but by the time it gets to the 10th person, the story has changed.It doesn't mean it didn't happen. It means, it was told by 4 different perspectives
Wow that was remarkable
I love Dr. Turek! To all believers please pray for me. I need help and I believe in the power of prayer so please pray, I need you
Deborah Haley I am praying for you. He is your peace in the storm
I absolutely LOVE that the theme music for this video is from Elegant Angel's "Big Wet Asses 13".
God bless you
Absolutely amazing.
In 2020 the best way to talk to non believers is to go to atheist RUclips channels and interact with them in the comment section . I challenge everyone to it . you will make a difference. God bless.
Indeed. Having a conversation with someone who knows how to think for himself will challenge you intellectually, therefore forcing you to make a difference in the way you see the world.
If we do 2 Tim 2:15.......rightly divide the word of truth, the New Testament started at the death of Christ on His Cross, Hebrews 9:15-17
GOD IS GREAT. Add to this that the Bible was written by different people and different time is one thing,but having every prophecy come true so far and rest as well will come true is another. I am almost sure that every person who denies Jesus as God and refuse to accept God as creator has not studied the Bible and i mean really studied the Scripture. Not one person who really wanted to know God has not come to meet the Lord. Never seen it. Any who. Jesus is my Lord and i pray that others would really strive to find Him. His LOVE is GREAT . GOD BLESS.
Liked
@DeaconDeZ "One person says one thing but by the time it gets to the 10th person, the story has changed.It doesn't mean it didn't happen."
Excuse me... but if the story has changed, then it absolutely means it didn't happen. That's what "changed" means. If the original story was accurate, then deviations from it did not happen.
You'll find that the gospels differ in so profound ways that "perspectives" is a hopelessly inadequate excuse. You don't forget to mention zombie invasions.
Great job.
'We have the same problems today as we did back then', does that mean it's purely irrelevant?
David James, No sir.
@@Pondimus_Maximus ok, but can you boogie?
No because this the prescription for the problem...
David James no! It shows that millions are still ignorant to the holy bible & holy men who were chosen by God trying to warn us we need a saviour, to repent, be baptised & follow Jesus! Thank God for the bible 📖❤️🙏🏽
I cant stop watching it's been two days lol
Outside the Bible, Jesus is also mentioned by his near-contemporaries. Extra-Biblical and secular writers (many hostile) point to Jesus' existence, including the Roman writings of Tacitus, Seutonius, Thallus and Pliny, and the Jewish writings of Josephus and the Talmud. Consider the chronicle of Cornelius Tacitus (55 to 117 A.D.). Tacitus was a Roman statesman and historian.
Google "fulfilled bible prophecies" for more evidence. Don't let others think for you. Do the reserach, it's worth it
Great job Frank. 👍🏾👍🏾
Who is this guy's? First time hearing him
may God bless you and add the numbers of your days so you can bless others by teaching the Word of God...
also please for me cuz i have stuggles in faith....
Well watching a man who hides the fact that the Bible was written by anonymous authors decades after the event happened probably won’t help your faith lmao
@@jesushad12gayfriendwhoallb50 do you want the chicken or donkeys to write down the fact about what happened in the time of Jesus???
@@krosstechguy3290 what😂 I want the eyewitness to write it not anonymous people who weren’t even alive
@@jesushad12gayfriendwhoallb50 just go to your nearest census...
@@krosstechguy3290 what? Are we speaking the same language lmao
Wow! Incredible evidence! So then it must be true! If only we used this method more often to know what is true...
Instead of all of science and probability theory..
He's talking about the validity of human nature, you know like a detective does, but hey you're too high and mighty for that.
@ Matthew Hondra: First setting aside that there is a reason your name is Matthew, and not Nero, Vespasian or Tiberius (those are name s we give to our dogs - we call our sons Matthew, John, Andrew, Stephen, Peter) let's begin.
And what science and probability theory would you like to see? Tell you what, when you can walk through and explain to all of us the complete proof of Fermat's Last Therorem, THEN you have a snowball's chance in hell of possibly following a pure logical proof of scripture. Even then I suspect that any such proof of scripture amd God would be ORDINAL orders of magnitude (and if you don't know what this means, you get to shut your mouth about science from here on out) more complex and interconnected than the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. And after all is said and done, you'll have to contend with Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem. Now you mentioned probability theory. I assume you have a working definition of what "random" means before we get started? And assuming you do (and that would be a publishable result) the I'd ask what underlying probability distribution(s) you propose to use to assess the likelihood of biblical truths, and how you arrived at them. Just understand that since history is NOT a repeatable experiment, the classical laboratory "scientific method" will NOT be available to you. The consequences of this are that (a) Bayesian methods of fine-tuning your prior and posterior distributions will fail on commencement, and (b) calibration of ANY such distribution is impossible, as every dataset consists simply of a single observation, since you will need to both assume and deny stochastic independence, at the same time!
No, the best standard of proof you can hope for for scripture is ONE of the two methdologies available to us these days: criminal court and civil court. The Case for Christ on a civil court standard is a virtual slam-dunk. You are stuck with the methods of criminal court.
The court asks for evidence. We provide the bible. The defence provides ZERO evidence to the court to refute the case that God and scripture represent truth, and i stead claims our evidence is invalid, and challenges us to prove our evidence is admissible. Atheists' court methodology is so pathetically weak I sincerely hope to NEVER be defended in court by an atheist! They SUCK at the whole process. Well, except for those who have yet to see these arguments, and be given the evidence and supporting documents. But someone like Richard Carrier is too useless at critical analytic reasoning for me even to interview as staff in any kind of complex regulatory analytical function.
Another good point to the religious atheist, that if everybody started living their way and by their principal ,their would be chaos and destruction . Only imagine if everybody started living what Jesus taught . Come on. He never took glory for Himself ,he never wanted any money or gold. Think please.
I love this!
@asgardian001 (3) Feel free to explain to me like an ADULT these two things:
So appearantly I can't ask you to pay attention to a guy like Turek that holds a lecture, because then I would be appealing to authority, and since I'm not allowed to do that, it makes you perfectly entitled to insult Turek and spew condescending remarks because that's how it goes by default. Nice.
And then you assume that THIS point Turek made, is suppose to prove the ENTIRE TRUTHFULNESS of these scriptures. Why?
@DeaconDeZ It's interesting how you mention the grapevine in the same breath though, because the grapevine is a much better analogy of how the gospels came to be. This completely destroys the idea of "perspectives" at all, as people a step or two down the chain really have zero knowledge of the original events and can't begin to judge what's true or not. Which is why hearsay is thrown out as evidence in courts and the scientific method.
When Jesus says before Abraham I am I don’t think it meant what you think it meant to be he’s just saying that he existed before Abraham
Not written by disciples yaar
@asgardian001 [I never said anything about the entire truthfulness of the scriptures only that Turek's reasoning was flawed.]
This is the problem: you're saying that Turek's reasoning is flawed, because you have decided that he expects you to believe these Bible stories are true because they are embarrasing to the authors. No. He's giving you GOOD REASONS to DISMISS them as wishfulthinking stories. It might put you in a more neutral position to begin with. Instead of being biggotred and biased.
Dr Frank I love you
❤️❤️❤️
AMEN!!! Powerful
The New Testament is embarrassing, nonsensical and false too.
Well not pope but understood mistake in terminology.
this is how we control people with these sermoms
Dont trust it, test everything. That's what I do, cant be wrong that way
We are only a fews days away from the fall of man and that mean ole serpent (Serpent constellation) will be made to crawl on his belly
For some reason I didn't expect to see Turek at Morningstar. This pleases me.
Man, Turek's got charisma. Really explains how he manages to dupe so many people.
/s, please don't stone me.
Satan in Hebrew means adversary. So basically Yeshua said don't be my adversary and get behind me because you don't want to be in front of him especially the day of the wrath.
Jesus talked to satan through Peter, thats why He "called" Peter satan
Would a writer of fiction make up so many characters with the same name, like Mary? Would a writer of fiction pen that confusing stuff in Romans about circumcision and uncircumcision?
1 out of 5 woman in Israel would be named mary
Well there can be translation mistakes when the writers speak an entire different language.
The Lord thy God is One God and you shall love Him with all your heart strength and mind, that is the greatest commandment.
You should also love thy neighbour as yourself.