Great to see how different CAD systems do things in their own way. I hope siemens guys are watching you too. Because as you pointed out, NX sew is lacking some options CATIA has.
Good example of an area Siemens should look to improve. "Guess what, something here doesn't work" is prevalent throughout NX though. Blends for example; "Blends not created"... ok, it happens, but why did it fail. Show me, so I can correct the failure areas, parameters, or whatever else might be causing it.
Catia beat NX in such function. More over if you join with holes, you can use boundary curve to see holes. NX can use analysis tool to outline by red highlight open holes
I work in both systems also, V5 is very strong in surfacing and don't get me wrong NX not weak at surfacing by any means. I like NX better for everything else, just more user friendly. This just my opinion. By the way, you are very knowledgeable in Design, I try to watch every Video and I learn a lot.
Great videos. Thanks for doing them.
Great to see how different CAD systems do things in their own way. I hope siemens guys are watching you too. Because as you pointed out, NX sew is lacking some options CATIA has.
Informative Mate
Excellent video...sir can you make videos on making powercopies(clip tower,dog house etc,). Guidelines step by step instruction please. Thank you
Great video, but I would have created a new surface using through curve mesh tangency.
Hi Steve! First of all, you are doing an awesome job. Very helpful.
How does one draw this part in catia or NX? Is it possible to create this surface part by only using Generative Shape design in Catia?
hi steve
Hi Steve,
Like ! More videos like that ! ;)
Good example of an area Siemens should look to improve. "Guess what, something here doesn't work" is prevalent throughout NX though. Blends for example; "Blends not created"... ok, it happens, but why did it fail. Show me, so I can correct the failure areas, parameters, or whatever else might be causing it.
hii how you rotate the nx part please say
Please show how to solve the A-surface
I like the nd but my choice is catia,I think catia is most friendly than nx
NX quick Pick have u tried it?
Catia beat NX in such function. More over if you join with holes, you can use boundary curve to see holes. NX can use analysis tool to outline by red highlight open holes
How would you approach modeling surfaces from a lines plan for a ship , especially around the bow section, with multiple changes in curvature?
I work in both systems also, V5 is very strong in surfacing and don't get me wrong NX not weak at surfacing by any means. I like NX better for everything else, just more user friendly. This just my opinion. By the way, you are very knowledgeable in Design, I try to watch every Video and I learn a lot.
I think both these programs suck. Alias is better. NX is good for solids
hi steve