260RIPS compares the new Pulsar Digex C50 and Infiray Tube TD50L Night Vision

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 апр 2022
  • Mark Ripley aka 260RIPS takes a look at two of the latest digital day/night vision riflescopes the new Infiray Tube TD50L and the Pulsar Digex C50
    Mark is forever asked which is best...so he takes a look at both side by side.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 18

  • @StezzSquad
    @StezzSquad 11 месяцев назад +4

    We wanted one of this to see the critters in our backyard. ruclips.net/user/postUgkxGix1RueFf66g4dKZ0w4Qsw_3Vv6Xqant The first thing that I like about this is that it has a rechargeable battery. The other is that it is small and fairly easy to use. The instructions weren't too great but we played with it awhile and figured it out. Can see very well in our back yard down to the woods which is roughly a football field length in the dark. There were certainly more expensive ones out there but this works for us and was within our price range. We have not tried the video recording portion and may update the review later.

  • @kenh6096
    @kenh6096 2 года назад +3

    Thanks for the comparison. The TD50L looks like it has slight juddering in the video compared to the C50. A bit like it's running at a lower refresh rate. Is that seen in real life or it a RUclips compression artifacts?

  • @davidstent1
    @davidstent1 2 года назад +1

    Which torch would you recommend for the TD50L Mark. Thanks.

  • @raymondoreilly7569
    @raymondoreilly7569 Год назад

    Hi there I just bought the Infiray TD50L, How do you get the rectilcal up on the screen?
    Regards Raymond

  • @lachlanclifford8697
    @lachlanclifford8697 7 месяцев назад

    How far away was the fallow buck in the pulsar footage?

  • @iandebie
    @iandebie 2 года назад +2

    I thought the Td50L was 4-16 x mag not 32?

  • @jamesholton2102
    @jamesholton2102 2 года назад

    How do they compare for a wraith for example?

    • @TheNightVisionShow
      @TheNightVisionShow  2 года назад +1

      DIgex C50 more sensitive in low light, and offers more realistic day time image, but it is twice the price.

  • @keesdane9687
    @keesdane9687 Год назад

    What you think for rat 🐀 shooting with scope you prefer Mark
    Thanks for your time

  • @nigelbase1196
    @nigelbase1196 Год назад

    Drone pro still king of the hill 😉

  • @TwighlightLodge
    @TwighlightLodge Год назад

    I'm surprised that the Chinese made knock-off is only 200 quid less than the Pulsar.

  • @Fox_hunter161
    @Fox_hunter161 Год назад

    Termion & Tube th

  • @MKChase-uj9vx
    @MKChase-uj9vx 2 года назад +1

    I have a TL35... the image is great... but the software is absolutely SHITE... you need a degree in computer science to zero it and the manual is shockingly translated..
    Honestly, I have a mate that bought one then sold it two months later for a grand less because he was that fed up with its complexity.
    Would I buy another unless they sort out the awful software... NO WAY!