Rudy Rauda Probably because they lost the original version and don't have the playback machine, because they destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back up again.
I Remember this....awesome.....a time when hope and discovery was new and important, when things meant something and made me think about becoming an Astronaut myself.....I watched all of this when i was a teenager....never left me, and neither my sense for watching the night skies....I'm an Amateur Astronomer, and still watch the night skies......thank you for sharing
Thank you. It was nice to relive a moment that I shared with my family years ago. My dad saw to it that we were interested in the things that went on around us. At that age...I would have missed it had it not been for him and my mom!❤️
Incredible moon mission. I wasn't born in that era but I am inspired by this mission, Astronauts and Great thanks for Dr. Wernher von braun he proved nothing is impossible for Human....
go look what he got written onhis headstone at his grave ... nasa is an occult masonic govt power house .. go work out what nasa means .. its missing 1 leter and as in occult , inverted (preversion and deception is the 3 of occult .. go learn who started it and their beliefs .. all isnt at it seems .. what was apollo god of ..
Going to the moon was a miracle back in 1960's . Thanks to the team of scientists , Astronuats and to the whole team of nasa to make this dream come true . Thanks to the goverment of America who provided the funds to make this mission impossible , possible . And in the last but not the least , many many Thanks to RUclipsr for sharing these rare videos with us .
@@patricksmith4424 The very best evidence is that these missions were in direct competition with Russia. Russia was watching this mission unfold in detail, they had a satellite orbiting the moon at the time, they coordinated with NASA to ensure the two missions would not interfere with one another. Russia had kicked our butts at nearly every step of the space race until the moon mission. That was the finish line. They had every motive to expose the US if we faked it. They didn't. In fact they acknowledged the accomplishment. Also, other missions (of other countries) have photographed the landing sights and they show clear evidence of our missions to those locations. The question is, do the nay sayers have credible evidence to dispute that we went. So far they do not. They speak from paranoid delusions about conspiracies that are too complicated to actually work. We are talking about a government that has a big problem with keeping even small secrets for very long. This one would be impossible. This is not unlike the old days, when you would travel across the country by wagon. It took months. And then someone arrives by new fangled train, something you aren't familiar with, and they were only on the train a week. To you, someone who never heard of a train, that would seem impossible, it took you months when you did it. But, as you learn how the train works it makes sense. Same here. Once you do a bit of learning about how all the pieces of the rocket and orbits work, it makes a lot more sense. Don't be ignorant please do some research and study, OK?
@@chriscoast2coast1207 Everything regarding Apollo is in the American public domain. There are billions of documents, including declassified documents, debriefings. scientific papers, physical evidence, etc. The hoax is complete nonsense and has never been debated outside of the internets silly hoax, myth, pseudoscience, paranormal, sci-fi, etc forums, websites, hoax videos.etc.
Only 4 of the 12 moonwalkers are still alive, and only 1 still alive was a mission commander. Better not waste time, if your goal is to shake their hands.
@@hotheadedjoelhaha I keep asking you, and you keep ignoring the question... how's your drug habit going lately? Have you gotten past the 8 hour mark yet? Can you go 8 hours without getting high yet? Or, are you still stuck at 6 hours?
First saw this on satellite TV on a German channel that would play them on a loop at night about 20 years ago. Was called 'spacenight'. Inspirational stuff! 👍❤️😊
Sure wish I had been old enough to appreciate these amazing Apollo missions, exploration at it's most thrilling and awe inspiring - what the hell have we done since that compares ?
We've managed to breed and raise a bunch of non thinking idiots who know nothing other than what they're told to think by fake videos that pander to their feelings that they are 100% convinced are the truth. Freaking pitiful.
@@scottmitchell358 Isn't it amazing how people can watch these videos and just be in awe at the beauty of what they perceive to be the moon, yet when I watch them, I think to myself what is preventing these people from seeing how fake this looks! Even the dialogue between the astronaut's sound like something you would hear on a Leave it to Beaver episode. How long can NASA keep this charade going? I know NASA has a great excuse for never having stars in any of the shots but not one picture of the sun ever? Seriously? A lot of people don't like some of the things Bart Sibrel did, especially when he tricked some of the astronauts in to doing interviews under false pretenses but I'm glad he did. Astronauts Gone Wild proved these guys were all liars. If they had really went to the moon, then they would never have acted the way they did. NASA deceived an entire world and is still laughing all the way to the bank.
We have had thousands of years of dreaming before it and fifty years after this small window of time when some people of the earth traveled to the moon. It’s a damn shame that so many want to just call it fake instead of studying and marveling at the rare opportunity. At this point I think what would be best is if instead of trying to go to Mars they just went back to the moon and land right near the old landing sites to prove to everyone they really happened. Otherwise when they go to Mars people will just say it was fake too.
Men have been dreaming of going to the moon since the days of Jules Verne, and even before. It came to a head with two nations competing to get there first, then it came to a halt. Why? Answer, because one of them made it there and did it . They also found out there isn't a whole lot there except a lot of DUST which makes it the most inhospitable place ever. I understand that once they opened the door of their hospital operating room sanitary lunar lander and tracked that dust in it was like the equivalent of opening up a big bag of fiberglass dust and throwing it all over. I think that alone may have been a large part of the reason they stopped going there. Besides that, low earth orbit became much, much more important. When I was a kid they taught us that we would have to build a big space station before going to the moon, as it turns out we went to the moon first then built space stations.
Consider that transmission delay "it's coming very loose there..." at 15:57. You can hear it repeated in the astronaut's headset. About 2 seconds of delay. Exactly the needed time it takes for radio signals to travel from the Earth to the Moon.
Astounding Amazing and Beautiful ! Really enjoying watching the footage from this exciting time. Im 58 and haven't seen this for a very long time. Thank you so much for posting xx
In diversi filmati di queste missioni apollo si vedono i due astronauti di turno fikmati con zoomate o spostamentilaterali della telecamera!! Come e' possibile questo?? A quel tempo non esistevano ancora telecamere comandate a distanza senza filo!!! Kubrick placet
I appreciated the memorial at 26:50 for all those who gave their lives in space travel, including the Soviet astronauts. They were just as brave as NASA's crew.
Names on the plaque; Charles A. Bassett II Pavel I. Belyayev Roger B. Chaffee Georgi Dobrovolsky Theodore C. Freeman Yuri A. Gagarin Edward G. Givens Jr. Virgil I. Grissom Vladimir Komarov Viktor Patsayev Elliot M. See Jr. Vladislav Volkov Edward H. White II, Clifton C. Williams Jr.
@Hal 9000 a) Nothing you said was true so why would I be hurt? b) Why would anyone be hurt by a comment on the internet? c) You childish comments just reinforce my assessment of you.
Intentionally haven't gone back in my opinion, disclosure is happening now with all of the UFO sightings. Governments can't conceal it any longer now that everyone has phones with excellent cameras
My respect to all the space pioneers that took part in those dangerous missions to enlarge our horizon of knowledges. It is a shame to think that everything was a long time fake. Such approach disregards the hard work of thousand people involved in those beautiful projects.
It was nice to relive a moment that I shared with my family years ago. My dad saw to it that we were interested in the things that went on around us. At that age...I would have missed it had it not been for him and my mom!❤
I realize that 1960's technology was more advance than today's. But despite this, I find it strange that no astronaut at any moment, mentions how hot/ cold it feels considering the temperatures out there. Or at the very least hear some praise about how well the space suit's liquid hydrogen refrigerating circuit combined with the micro particular lead covered nanoporous breathable polyethylene textile works
To the nay sayers who still think it was all fake, its in the geniuses world record book, you can't fake them. For the stupid x- generation Google it. I remember watching Apollo 15 on CBS network on my brand new RCA 25 inch color console TV. I also remember watching Walter Cronkite on this mission. You can't fake uncle Walter.
So you swallowed the bait hook line and sinker. You go ahead and believe whatever you have to so you can make it through your day. The rest of us are not falling for the bullshit. I suppose you trust the government 100%
Wow. I thought I’d seen and read it all but apparently not. The hammer feather drop is beautiful and I am sad I’m seeing it now for the first time at 43. And the memorial plaque and little figurine: wow. Just wow. Don’t think I’ve even seen a pic of it in all the space books I read growing up. Remarkable!
@Brian S "Me too ",I came to tell people "science is provable"."And libraries are still free" NASA can't lie, even if they wanted too, we would catch them. Of course, all the internet scientists are sure they're smarter than the 375,000 men and women who worked for the 20,000 NASA subcontractors during the 12 year Apollo program..LOL
From Dave Scott's essay in National Geographic, September 1973: “The rover functions impeccably as we ride from site to site, accumulating fragments of history. We bounce and pitch across omnipresent chuckhole-like craters. The motion exactly resembles that of a small boat in a rough sea; so does the effect. Incredible as it seems in the arid environment of the moon, seasickness could become an occupational hazard.”
I remember that story in NG. It was a side piece to the expansive coverage of the Apollo 17 mission. A wonderful, yet sad bow out of National Geographic's long coverage of the future, present and now past moon missions.
@@brianarbenz7206 They really did a good job of covering the space program up through the early seventies. Most of what I knew about the Apollo program back then was what I learned from their excellent articles and pictures and the detailed and interesting articles by Kenneth Weaver.
James Erwin described in his book ‘To Rule the Night’ that he put up an array of 300 glass reflectors. This Laser Reflector device is still being used today by astronomers on earth to shine laser, reflected back for precise distance ranging. This can sense distance change of earth surfaces for earthquake detection.
I tried to watch as much as i could. CBS aired most of the major activity on the moon,but they did not show this stuff. I had just joined the Army in 1971.
How eerie/weird, 14 dead on that plaque then their would be 14 more deaths later in the two Shuttle disasters. Co-incidence? Great video,thank you. Ken
There was obviously a practice run across the set that left the tire track marks. They failed to blend the joy ride practice run tire tracks into the virgin surface of the moon. Zamboni...boligna
MOUNT HADLEY W. Who does remember when Apollo 15 landed, by high art and skill, H. Here on a plain by the Moon's own Apennines, near Hadley Rille? E. "Ecce Mons Apenninus Lunae!": "Behold MOUNT HADLEY afar!", a chosen Site! N. Note IRWIN climbing down those coppern-gold rungs to say: "Oh, Boy!...What a Site!" A. As I remember well those Days, the golden hues of excellence indeed P. Prevailed when SCOTT did say, "MAN MUST EXPLORE!" to satisfy his need. O. Onward the Rover drove, on moonscape-fields of football-sized strewn rocks, L. Laid bare midst curving powdery snow drifts, as SCOTT to IRWIN talks. L. Likewise JOE ALLEN spoke through microphone as Houston's Voice: O. "O, Get good rocks as sample stones into gem-bags of choice!" F. From nearby Crater fills some diamonds in the goldlink necklace! I. Is not that Rover ride a wondrous tour of Lunar Mystery's Face? F. From Falcon's landing point upon Palus Putredinis, Marsh of Decay, T. To exploration's height: sunlit MOUNT HADLEY high, a deep assay. E. Exclaims JIM IRWIN to DAVE SCOTT, right at the argent Peak upon E. Egressing by: "DAVE, from whence my "HELP!"? From Houston too, anon: N. Nostalgic memory in scenic melody now echoes back from lunar hills! W. When Rock of Genesis: The Gem of expedition's win a Quest fulfills. A. And Galileo's vindicating test by falcon feather's fall and SCOTT'S hammer too: S. Seen going down to simultaneous end-gravity field's proven true! H. Has Hadley's Legacy been fully understood upon Decay's Touchdown? E. Even properly construed over its own significance to us in town? R. Resolve to end urban decay-moral decay, pthisis all, and more: all others conquer too! E. Ever reverse Dekay's effects on U: Behold yon Hadley's Help to You! I, A.S.K. ( I,Albert Stephen Kundrat) I Ask for anyone to read my Poem here-on! "ASK not What your Country can do for You, ASK what You can do for your Country!"- President John F, Kennedy Note : "HELP!" from the Beatle's Album : "HELP! I need somebody's Help, not just anybody's HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP! HELP!.. My Independence seem to vanish in the Haze. Will U please, please HELPMME!
Thinking the "stars" are probably junk (dust) on the lens, common in photography. You can see when the astronauts are moving around deploying scientific equipment (like cameras) the stuff is flying everywhere, and all over their suits. When backlit, small (very thin), and semi transparent, this happens a lot. Moon dust may ultimately be one of the biggest obstacles to "living" there, believe it or not (mark my words). It is not dust, as we think of it, weathered and round, it is more like VERY tiny shards of glass, a large percentage of it (ejecta), and it gets into EVERYTHING. The astronauts can be heard complaining about it, and the impossibility of keeping it out of the vehicle in several vids and transcriptions, and spent a LOT of time trying to "house keep" it away. Think more volcanic ash than dust we are used to dealing with, which can destroy machinery it gets into, and that is picked up electrostatically by everything (tools, boots, suits, gloves, machinery, etc.) and sticks to everything it comes in contact with. If I remember correctly they even removed their moon excursion suits and left them behind in the discarded LM upper stage, before they entered the command module for return to Earth, to try to keep the dangerous mess (even to lungs) out of that vehicle (maybe not, but I seem to remember that, obviously they'd have to have more than one suit each to do that, again, not sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if the moon expeditionary suits were of different design than the command module suits, since they would HAVE to be if the backpacks were integral, again, don't remember). The upper left is some piece of equipment. They left scientific instruments there in every mission.
Fully grown scientist tinkering around with projection screens and plastic models. When the fun was over, they were probably in some backroom smoking cigars and playing cards having a big laugh about it.
@11:00 the astronaut starts an experiment to throw the packaging; when he loses his footing and starts falling down. He puts his hand down to catch himself; and doesn't even appear to touch the lunar sand; but somehow miraculously lurches upwards & lands upright on his feet again...How can you honestly NOT call BS on that?
He clearly used the tool in his right hand to help catch his fall. You can see the dirt clearly fly out from it. The space suit he’s wearing is also highly pressurized, which obviously assisted in rebounding to its pressured state as he got that low to the surface. But fun for you, though, picking out a tiny little thing you can’t explain and using that to decide the whole thing was faked!
Radio signals are directional or line of sight. To receive a satellite signal to watch SkyTV the small dish, about 90cm in diameter on your house, must be pointed directly at the satellite which is stationed at a geosynchronous orbit. The satellite relays TV signals from a ground station and transmits the signal back down to the earth surface. Everyone knows that if the dish is moved even slightly the TV signal is lost. The same goes for the radio, telemetry signals transmitted from the moon during the Apollo landings. The transmitted signal strength was about 20 watts which required a large dish on earth to receive a clean signal. There were various dishes pointed at the moon receiving these signals as it orbited around the earth; Jodrell Bank, Parkes in Australia and Goonhilly down. The Russians were also monitoring the signals using the multiple array antenna dishes at North Station. Radio hams were also able to detect the VHF signals of the Astronauts conversation... www.arrl.org/eavesdropping-on-apollo-11 Baysinger says that on the night of the Apollo 11 landing, he and Rutherford had to essentially aim the antenna at the Moon by getting behind it and sighting it like a gun. This was difficult since the weather was cloudy and the Moon not easily visible. The antenna, which was originally built for Baysinger’s radio astronomy work, had a motorized steering mechanism but it had to be manually guided. Its “beam” or “field of view” was such that, once pointed at the Moon, it could be let go for a little while, but pretty soon it would have to be re-aimed because the motions of the Earth and Moon caused the Moon to drift out of the antenna’s field and the signal to be lost. In fact, this was one piece of evidence that the Apollo 11 signals the receiver picked up were indeed from the Moon - if the antenna was not kept aimed at the Moon, the signal disappeared. Baysinger’swife and daughter watched the Apollo 11 landing on TV while Baysinger and Rutherford listened via Baysinger’s equipment. The signal on the home-built equipment came through approximately 5-10 seconds earlier than the signal on TV. It was noisy, but you could hear what was going on. So if they never landed on the moon can someone please explain how the US managed to fake the radio and telemetry data as coming from the moon ?
Apollo 11 only had a quad dish array and like you say has to be pointing to Earth to within 2 degrees to be picked up from any of the large arrays here on Earth, which again as you say the motions of the Earth and moon would make it impossible to have a continouse signal, using the website www.everythingrf.com you will work out that the 20 watts fed into the quad array would not detectable, when you feed in 200 watts it was possible only if in perfect alignment, for Baysinger to receive VHF signal would be impossible with his equipment so its best to ignore this story, probably was paid to tell it, look up FSPL (free space path loss) It is well documented that a signal decreases in a way that is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source, another way to express this is the signal = 1 divided by distance squared. (inverse square law)
Great stuff ......a rather lighthearted mentioning here about the jolly fanfare music during a white nuckle Lem ascend from the Moon , which later was considered controversial , the loud music which could interfere with concentration during this dangerous phase, when the astronauts should be able to hear each other and Capcom. Houston wasn't happy about that at all. Which ofcourse emerged years later.
Покажите ту камеру или её описание её характеристик, которая снимала этот старт. Она должна иметь автоматическую фокусировку и систему удержания снимаемого объекта в кадре. То есть, она должна иметь электропривод на фокусировке и привод для изменения угла съемки по вертикали. При этом должна быть электроника для управлением работой этих приводов с соответствующими алгоритмами, процессором и памятью. На весь процесс управления, из 36 секундного ролика, остаётся всего несколько секунд.
В то время никаких процессоров еще не было и кинокамеры управлялись с Земли. Они имели полный электропривод. Некоторые, которые были установлены на Аполлоне 11 этого не имели.
8:20 - 8:45 The shadow of the rover's dish antenna doesn't change as the rover rolls across the surface at a good clip. How far away would a stage light have to be to leave a shadow like that? 93 million miles away.
Why the fuck are people discrediting it? There has been 6 lunar landings, so much evidence out there regarding the design and development of the apollo missions. How could it have been impossible to land on the moon? It all makes sense how they managed to do it, there is so much information that it cannot be discredited. You're too stupid to understand how they did it, so your only conclusion is that it was faked. Read about it, learn about it and draw your own conclusion. I have and it seems very credible that it happened, and yes they has the technology (just about) to pull it off.
@@EinkOLED You apparently failed to realize that Deploracle is on your side. Read again. He said the light source is 93 million miles away, which goes AGAINST the moon hoax nutbags who think that this is a studio.
I was confused too. I've never studied shadows much, but can never recall seeing one in varying monotone, like its a photo. I've always seen them in black or nothing. Another thing, the moon surface is shot in monotone, yet the image has a camera covered in the usual gold foil in front of everything.
Of course I can explain why the ISS can fly with a horizontal attitude: It can fly with a horizontal attitude because it has an orbital speed which allows to create a centrifugal force which counters the earth attraction. When the LM is near the moon with a low horizontal speed, it no longer benefits of this centrifugal force; and, unlike a plane on earth, it does not benefit of the air lift either; so it has to counter the lunar attraction with its engine.
16:20 - 16:39 At this point you can prove the moon landing was real. The two oscillating parts below and to the left of the camera would behave differently at the speed at which they were driving if they were driving with the atmosphere present. If there was an atmosphere, the wind would have pushed it backwards.
Dale Rogers. You can pull up high-resolution images of the tunnel. NASA as well as the German space agency and Arizona State University have used NASA's LROC spacecraft .to map and study the Moon. The Germans and Arizona state operated the LROC independently of NASA on their own money. In other words , the German space agency and ASU had control over the spacecraft and cameras,etc..I'm not clear on how Arizona state worked with NASA.I imagine NASA might have reduced the fees being this was a teaching university in American. So if you have a computer and some software, [photoshop is excellent ] you can blow up and crop detailed images of the tunnel. I haven't pulled up any images, but beware the tiff files are huge files. You can now examine the Moons geology, Apollo, Soviet, China,etc landing sites , etc in amazing detail.
At 25:00 the Soviets actually assist the mission by helping the U.S.A. track Pulsars after the mission pointed a special XRay spectrometer into far space.
I'd listen to these two cosmonauts... who say that the earth is flat: ruclips.net/video/-DlvWoZLBHs/видео.html - and that space doesn't exist - or we've never been there: ruclips.net/video/ipDfJwkmkj8/видео.html Then I would take some time - as long as it takes - to research Flat Earth, and Nasa's fakery... Enjoy!
Nature and Physics A NASA excursion to Antarctica was done prior to 1969 to collect lunar samples from meteorites. This is common knowledge. Not necessarily proof of the landing.
@@DA-sv2iw - It is only "common knowledge" to conspiracy theorists who make false claims about Von Braun's Antarctica expedition, knowing that certain people would believe them without question. Lunar meteorites were first identified in 1982, *10 years after the last Apollo mission!* Until then, there was only speculation among a few that such meteorites could exist, but no-one had identified them to prove it. After years of analysis of the rocks/samples returned by Apollo and the tiny amount of moon samples returned by the USSR, features unique to moon rock were identified. So in 1982, when analysis of a meteorite revealed the *same* features, it proved for the first time that a meteorite originated from the moon. Therefore unless Von Braun was a time traveller who went back to the 60s, there's no way he or anyone else could have known about lunar meteorites, much less identify them among all the other meteorites (and why would a rocket scientist rather than a geologist be sent to collect fake 'moon rocks' among meteorites?). Today, only about 100 pounds of lunar meteorites have been identified worldwide since their discovery in 1982, whereas Apollo returned 840 pounds of moon rocks/samples, including core samples up to 9 feet long! But that's not all, *meteorites have a very violent history!* Travelling significantly faster than any bullet, meteoroids enter earth's atmosphere which causes them to heat up until they glow white hot, where the molten outer layers are stripped away as they tear through our atmosphere. If any rock is left to reach the surface, it _smashes_ into the earth. Hence there's a *huge difference* between meteorites and the pristine moon rocks picked up from the moon's surface with their intricate microscopic surface detail still intact. Therefore even the most inexperienced geologist would not mistake a meteorite for a moon rock, much less experienced geologists throughout the world. In other words, the claim that Von Braun or ANYONE went to Antarctica to collect 'moon rocks' during the 60s is nonsense on many levels :-)
We have so much potential with that big rock up there. I really hope (in the name of science) the moon becomes our next hub into the galaxy for the greater good of mankind
It's not only disrespectful to the astronauts to accuse NASA of a conspiracy but also immensely insulting to the more than 400,000 people that ultimately made the missions possible.
man it makes me feel bad for the flat earth folks and there lack of understanding.( no wonder they are all so grumpy)... this is fantastic... To grasp what we did.. I am just glad that I was old enough to watch every launch from the first mercury to the last apollo and the first few space shuttles... It was an exciting time.. thanks for that share guys.. it brought back some good memories...
Tom, in service to Christ I think that's the same news crew that filmed the first lem landing on the moon. They must also be the ones who took video ABOVE the orbiter as it sped around the room. Those people have never received an ounce of credit.🤣
lmao wow pay attention at 18:35 to around 18:52. Watch how the lightsource is movied over the astronauts heads to light them up better, this cannot be explain as the aperture of the camera opening wider to make it brighter, because when that happens the surrounding terrain because out of focus and blurry, watch when the light gets brighter you can distinctly still see every distinguishable hole and rock on the ground, and also note the glare on the rocorder, you can clearly see the lightsource
Well, comment is nine years old and you might be dead but, another more reasonable explanation is that light was reflecting off their extraordinarily bright white spacesuits back into the camera, brightening the surroundings.
The answer is exposure time. As stars are dim and the foreground is bright, you have to adjust the camera exposure. Your smartphone does the same automatically. To photograph dimmer stars you'd need an exposure time of several minutes.
stonerlemonblues thank you And I appreciate the response. with all due respect I today just found out that they equipped Apollo 11 I believe with a camera specifically for photographing the stars. I actually heard the video from 1969 I believe it was. but. they still didn't manage to get one pic of them.
@flim flam We equipped them with everything, including very high res 70mm still cameras (even under modern standards) and even with a high rez 16mm cinema camera. What we see is blur. Hammer and feather fall at the same time. The only problem: it is all blur and the feather can be, at a push, seen to bounce back twice(!) before the head of the hammer touches the soil. It's nice to say that most of the photos are lost. The same applies to Russian (Soviets) - tons of footage from their lunokhods (lunar rovers) seem to be lost. Very convenient. One day a spacecraft will go near these landings or even land there. It must happen, hopefully. But I no longer believe in justice. Most photos with stars and many videos are only recent. They were never there back in the day. Once again, the arguments of _lost or not released_ are used.
Sim, parabens com o fakery! I'd listen to these two cosmonauts... who say that the earth is flat:ruclips.net/video/-DlvWoZLBHs/видео.html - and that space doesn't exist - or we've never been there: ruclips.net/video/ipDfJwkmkj8/видео.html Then I would take some time - as long as it takes - to research Flat Earth, and Nasa's fakery... Enjoy!
I agree, what a great show. I suspect Kubric did apollo 11,12 in the UK, showed them how to do it and they did the other 5 in the US. Maybe that's why 13 was a cock up. The transition was not running smoothly so they had to abandon the moon shots. More grease for the gantry anyone!
LMG YOU'RE BORN AFTER 2000 .. IT'S ALL A SCRIPTED MOVIE.. IT'S THROWN AT SOCIETY ALL DAY ..UP TO YOU WAKE UP..SPACE MAY BE THE FINAL FRONTIER BUT IT'S MADE IN A HOLLYWOOD BASEMENT...
@@k.s.333 Back then I believe congress assigned Nasa's funding. Apparently those congressmen thought beating the russians to the moon was a matter of the utmost national importance. Now, the thinking has changed. There's no reason to spend billions in doing something that you have already done and delivers virtually 0 return.
@@k.s.333 Well. I myself would agree with you there. What I meant was, in the eyes of US Congress, it delivers 0 return. It's the same thinking that pulled the plug on the shuttle program.
LOLOLOLOLOL You government worshipping slack jawed mouth breathing fool. It's been a half century now since the apollo hoaxes. Keep praying to our government God and maybe....just maybe someone will eventually make it to the moon on the next century or two.
@@yomommaahotoo264 Hey Yo', Why chew gotta be such a dousche bag ???? Life's to short for that kinda nonsense !!! You really need to learn to love Uncle Sam !!!
@@sumbeech1484 And I will.....the minute they start obeying and protecting our constitution, stop with the false flag wars, abolish their exclusive unconstitutional immunities, and own up to it's past criminality.
@@yomommaahotoo264 I'm with you on the wars, we've spilled enough blood and money. It's time we worry about America and the American people. But we did go to the Moon nine times and 9/11 was a terrorist attack over our continued aggression and support of those in the Mid East that Al Qaeda, considered enemies.
@@Godscountry2732 OBL and the hijackers were patseys and any footage our on-the-take corporate owned media showed was in different airports BEFORE 911. The WTC buildings were planted with nano thermate. It was a demolition.....all done because Saddam Hussein threatened to dump basing his oil production on the petro dollar, which would domino and cause a collapse of our fiat printed world dollar standard. No one including all of the Space Shuttle missions have ever been beyond the Van Allen radiation belts because of the deadly radiation of outer space. Without the earth's magnetic fields there would be no life on earth, and likewise if man were sent beyond those protective magnetic belts. We cannot send into space the weight of lead or water necessary to shield us from that deadly radiation no matter what Star Trek movies said. It was....and still is a hoax that anyone ever did...or probably ever will travel beyond the Van Allen radiation belts, no matter what a bunch of well paid nasa and government parrots instruct our on-the-take media to tell us.
the mountains are so lovely they forgot to turn the cameras so that we could see them (instead of looking at the bloody ground!) you can describe anything to the listening public without the pictures to back them up.
I don't know why my post is not visible now. Maybe it's because I included around a dozen links to the photographs that you think don't exist. Anyway, the answer is that they took hundreds of photos of the mountains. It's true that they verbally described the mountains in a stand-up EVA from the top hatch of the LEM, prior to the first EVA when they climbed out onto the surface. They hadn't yet set up a TV video camera for the ground based geologists to be able to see what they were seeing, so in the meantime, they verbally described them instead. Is that what you're referring to? But, anyway, the bottom line is that they took hundreds of photos of the mountains on Apollo 15, and thousands in total across all of the mission photography. I don't know why you're saying that they "forgot to turn the cameras." You have ZERO understanding of this topic.
It's lens flare. That's where the light bounces back and forth in a lens a few times, creating white spots like that. Most photographers or movie makers try to avoid it. Some (i.e. J.J. Abrams) actually want lens flare. Here's one example of photographic lens flare: i.ytimg.com/vi/iLo8aMKr7E4/maxresdefault.jpg
You're wrong. 100% bullshit. There are several times that the rover camera does a 360 degree pan around. Go watch ALL of the videos, not just the ones other conspiratards spoon-feed you.
JUST TO INFORM THE YOUNGER GENERATION.............THE APOLLO PROGRAM WAS THE GREATEST TECHNICAL PROJECT IN HISTORY.............AND ALWAYS WILL BE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
.....er...no. At that height and with no air resistance - that would happen. From a greater height - the hammer would start to accelerate as its denser. You don't need to (fake) go the moon to show that. We did it in primary school with vacuum chamber. Shows how desperate they and you are to try to qualify nonsense. Simple.
@@rockethead7 i think this idiot doesnt know that a rocket in space keeps moving without using the engine after being put in the right flight path. There is a vacuum, so nothing can stop the spacecraft or slow it down. Only earths gravity.
The battery technology was more than enough for many hours of operation. They used very high capacity (390 Watt-hour silver-zinc for Apollo 15's mission and the later ones) non-rechargeable batteries which were each good for 1 EVA. After use, they were replaced with a new fresh battery that had been retrieved from the descent stage's MESA at the end of the previous EVA, and installed before the next EVA began. The silver-zinc batteries were not rechargeable, but they did pack quite a capacity into a rather small package.
Ricardo B : "Or they know something that we do not?" Apparently so - because they were professionals and spent years on research. www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/ALSJ-FlightPLSS.pdf
They can make batteries that last years with no recharge. Those are not the batteries offered to the general consumer because there's no commodity in batteries that last years. Phone batteries are designed to last an average of a day, to make a safer battery that will limit heat conduction and damage to the electronics internal components.
NASA cult members just can't let go of this grown up fairy tale. I actually understand why though. If they admit it was fake, the fear of being lied to on such a grand scale is horrifying. I Sympathize with them.
But no one can ever provide any compelling evidence to suggest that the Moon landings were fake. It’s always the exact same talking points over and over and over again, which fall apart completely at the slightest scrutiny.
Pssssst. They never calculated trajectory for the 200 mph solar winds. If corse they didn’t know about them back then. Not to mention these little guys rip the edges of our atmosphere off into space. Oh ya they also are hitting the surface of the moon. Yes they are constantly moving. Oh oh ya NASA now admits we lost the technology to go back and we have to figure out how to protect astronauts from these winds. The darkness cannot comprehend the light. When the light shows up darkness runs.
To all you moon hoaxers, look at 9:28. Notice how much dust is kicking up and how far it goes despite how little effort it took to do so. This is something that could only happen in low gravity. Unless you can tell me what kind of dust, sand, or dirt moves like it's in low gravity... I guess there's no real explanation for that. And no, speeding up the footage doesn't make the dust go any less far than it does at normal speed.
Just can't describe what the hell happenned on the day Apollo 11 crew held the press conference. They look like three kids who just got cheated in a softball game and didn't get what was promised. There were not a moment of sincerity of anything coming out of an achievement of such a global scale. It felt like they had guns pointed at their heads the whole time.
1) Many people assume this press conference occurred just hours or days after they returned from the moon and therefore *expect* to see that reflected in the astronauts. But this press conference actually occurred *3 WEEKS* after they returned from the moon. 2) The astronauts were in quarantine for most of those 3 weeks, due to a policy at the time to safeguard mankind against the possibility of some kind of space virus being brought back to Earth (they scrapped that policy soon afterwards). 3) Those astronauts were ALL ex test pilots who risked their lives pushing experimental aircraft to its limits, at a time when an average of 1 test pilot per week was killed in the USA. Hence they were used to keeping their emotions under control and remaining calm and professional during the most stressful situations (that's why they were chosen for the job in the first place!). 4) This press conference was for the 3 astronauts to answer serious questions from experts in their fields, including from astronomers and scientists and engineers, and hence they were effectively at work here. Notice all the technical details and jargon mentioned. So this wasn't a press conference for the general public. 5) How happy does Neil Armstrong and the other astronauts look while in quarantine before that press conference? *ruclips.net/video/j6P1wBNHqnU/видео.html* How happy does Neil Armstrong appear in front of the troops in Vietnam? *ruclips.net/video/qSKCaxx58Bg/видео.html* So the idea that there's something wrong with the Apollo 11 astronauts during the press conference is based upon false assumptions and false expectations my friend :-)
@@yazzamx6380 Dude just accept the fact that you bought the lie and forgive yourself and go on from there. There's no need to make excuses that make zero sense. More and more people are realizing it was a lie and in the near future the majority will regard the mission as a hoax and it will die.
@@orange70383 - Except they don't look ashamed and troubled, they look like professionals at work. You are projecting your expectations onto them and then jumping to conclusions just because your expectations have not been met. This is over 50 years old remember, so please provide a link to a credible and experienced body language expert or psychologist who claims there's something wrong with the astronauts during that press conference. After all, do you really believe the world's best experts in various fields of the study of human behavior for 50 YEARS have ALL missed what you claim to see? :-)
@@orange70383 - You said "Dude just accept the fact that you bought the lie " Just accept the fact that you have allowed yourself to be manipulated and controlled by conspiracy theorists. I know men landed on the moon from ALL the evidence, including third party evidence (hence nothing to do with NASA); en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings And before you dismiss that because it's a Wiki page, remember that the *sources* for all that information is in the reference section at the bottom of the page. You said "More and more people are realizing it was a lie" EVERY conspiracy believer says that, from alien abduction to flat Earth, so don't use such a poor argument please. Focus on the facts only :-)
@Kit Canyon lol as always with understanding a person's thought you jump to assumption and end in name calling like a child... My statement is based on the video as presented that on that day was the first time they traveled to that location yet they were traveling over alkready made tracks and when they showed that they were traveling back to the lunar lander they a portion of that clip as part of the return trip.. I said nothing about conspiracy or fake moon filmstage . You said that. All I'm pointing out is what they say is happening in those pieces of this documentary is not it is stitched together with footage that doesn't belong in the sequence. So obviously they think to some degree that to the bone believers like your self can be and are mentally manipulated.. and I hate to burst your bubble but It is True NASA lies about many many things. One thing is for sure the extreme temperatures in troposphere can reach over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit far above the melting point of almost all the materials used in the space craft. And none of the material used can block the over extreme radiation that would cook them alive from the inside out if the actually entered the van Allen radiation belt through which the craft would have to fly through to get to the Moon, to Mars and all other space destinations. So either they went to the Moon and the Moon is in Low Earth orbit below the van Allen belt or it is actually outside Earth's orbit and no one has been to the Moon and no satellites have been to any other places in outer space because they too we're supposedly made from materials that melt below 3000 degrees Fahrenheit.. although everyone agrees that 3 men died trying to get their. Cooked like 3 hampsters in a microwave... Also Thrust does work in a closed vaccum space but is useless in a no contained open vaccum space .. things you might want to study up before calling others children or any other names.. personally though I laugh at such tactics to demean others in this way. I study things from all directions the pros and the cons The psuedo and real science.. the applied mathematics and the observable Truth and The stitched together "Footage" presented in a film as real in a timeline sequence that reuses the same snippets of film in different places of the documentary promoted as real untouched filn footage...the only argument you have provided so far is nothing that you have witnessed or proven on your own only "Information" you were told by or you read written by someone else ... So get a grip Skippy go out and prove on your own what is real. Than and only than can you have valid place in an honest conversation..!!. Name calling is the action if a child.... Peace out and good look in your carreer as an internet trolll
@@tmmt6549 YOU SAID: "AT 10:15 THEY ARE DRIVING ON PREVIOUSLY MADE VEHICLE TRACKS AND SAME FOOTAGE IS USED AT 16:14" == Yes, they didn't use the 16mm camera endlessly, you know. They had only 2-3 minute canisters. So, they didn't exactly leave it running for every drive. And, the color wheel TV camera mounted to the rover didn't work while it was moving (couldn't keep the dish aimed at the Earth while moving), so for that particular footage, 16mm was all they had. Editors of these documentaries often borrow footage from other parts of the missions to fill holes in the available footage. They even sometimes take footage from other missions and patch them in. They didn't go back over their tracks the next day, like some others said in this thread. They don't know what they're talking about. Here's a map of each traverse. Yes, sometimes they rode back on the same path that they rode out on. lunarscience.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/a15_traverse2.png YOU SAID: "I said nothing about conspiracy or fake moon filmstage . " == Correct. Your original response had nothing to provoke the notion that you were saying the moon missions were faked. You were pointing out facts, and the use of footage that didn't technically belong in the sections they were presented in. YOU SAID: "So obviously they think to some degree that to the bone believers like your self can be and are mentally manipulated." == It's just the editing of the 3rd party editors who splice these documentaries together. The original footage is available in its entirety, and contains no such problems. YOU SAID: "One thing is for sure the extreme temperatures in troposphere can reach over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit far above the melting point of almost all the materials used in the space craft." == Um, yes, some of the atoms/molecules in the troposphere can get really hot. So what? Why do you think this is relevant to the melting point of the materials of the spacecraft? That's not how thermodynamics works. And, there's a reason you won't find any actual physicists making this silly statement you're making. Basically, yeah, they can be hot. But, we're counting molecules at that point. It's very close to being a perfect vacuum. I mean, let's draw an analogy. If you jump into a swimming pool with water that's 210 degrees (F), you're not going to live very long, that's going to be quite fatal. If you get a single small drop of water on you that is 210 degrees, yeah, you'll feel a bit of a burn, but it will only last a second, then you'll be fine. If you get the tiniest of tiny mists of 210 degree water sprayed on you, we're talking about less than a drop, sprayed out into small microscopic drops, you probably won't even notice it. Well, when you get up into the troposphere, sorry, but there are so few molecules/atoms at that point, it really doesn't matter how hot they are. They cannot heat up a spacecraft. This is basic thermodynamics. Entry level. YOU SAID: "And none of the material used can block the over extreme radiation that would cook them alive from the inside out if the actually entered the van Allen radiation belt through which the craft would have to fly through to get to the Moon, to Mars and all other space destinations." == Bull. Fucking. Shit. That is absolute crap. And, James Van Allen hated that you idiots use his name to say this nonsense. YOU SAID: "So either they went to the Moon and the Moon is in Low Earth orbit below the van Allen belt or it is actually outside Earth's orbit and no one has been to the Moon" == Oh, really? So, those are the only two options? There isn't the third option: you don't fucking know what you're talking about? Hey, asshole, if you believe every physicist on Earth is wrong about physics, and doesn't understand basic entry-level thermodynamics... and you believe you know more about the Van Allen belts than James Van Allen... what are you wasting your time on RUclips for? Write up your calculations, and submit them for scientific peer review. If you're right, you'll have rewritten everything known about thermodynamics and about cosmic radiation. Your Nobel Prize is in the mail. YOU SAID: "and no satellites have been to any other places in outer space because they too we're supposedly made from materials that melt below 3000 degrees Fahrenheit.." == You think a few hot atoms will melt the gajillion zillion trillion billion atoms of a satellite??? You're an idiot. YOU SAID: "although everyone agrees that 3 men died trying to get their. Cooked like 3 hampsters in a microwave..." == ENGLISH, you idiot. I cannot understand this broken gibberish. YOU SAID: "Also Thrust does work in a closed vaccum space" == Oh, so now, Newton's 3rd law of motion no longer functions, huh? Yup, Nobel Prize, coming your way. YOU SAID: "but is useless in a no contained open vaccum space .. things you might want to study up before calling others children or any other names.. " == 10 years at 3 universities, top of every physics class I ever took... is that enough studying for you, dumbass? YOU SAID: "personally though I laugh at such tactics to demean others in this way." == You are demeaning yourself, dumbass. YOU SAID: "I study things from all directions the pros and the cons" == There should be a law against you using the word "study." I don't think you know what it means. YOU SAID: "The psuedo and real science." == Oh, the irony. You have determined that the laws of thermodynamics are wrong, the laws of motion are wrong, and you have zero understanding of radiation. Yet, you think you can identify "pseudo" and "real" science??? YOU SAID: "the applied mathematics and the observable Truth and" == You're a moron. YOU SAID: "The stitched together "Footage" presented in a film as real in a timeline sequence that reuses the same snippets of film in different places of the documentary promoted as real untouched filn footage." == Bull. Fucking. Shit. This is very common in documentaries. If you want the footage in its original form, go watch that. Documentaries are subject to editing. When I first read your statements, yeah, I thought it was pretty ridiculous that somebody would jump on your case for merely stating facts (100% correct facts). But, alas, you've proven yourself to be about as dumb as a person can be. Hey, fucking genius, next time you want to defy the core of known physics in a single RUclips message, just write it all up for scientific peer review instead. You'll either be laughed out the door, or you'll win a couple of Nobel Prizes. Guess where my money is going?
![Apollo 12 Remastered (50th Anniversary Edition) [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/02iHPsBA1gI/mqdefault.jpg)
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
Beautiful!! I'm 53 years old..I have not seen this footage since I saw it on TV when I was a kid.
Thanks for posting!
64mung bruh
@@p3ter408 bruh
Rudy Rauda Probably because they lost the original version and don't have the playback machine, because they destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back up again.
did some recognize that he said creatures..and the scene with the rock:something is swinging(plant)
yea same here haha unreal
I Remember this....awesome.....a time when hope and discovery was new and important, when things meant something and made me think about becoming an Astronaut myself.....I watched all of this when i was a teenager....never left me, and neither my sense for watching the night skies....I'm an Amateur Astronomer, and still watch the night skies......thank you for sharing
... thak you for sharing too.
Love these old documentaries there's something about the music
Thats right 🤤🤤
Couldn't agree more.. everything back then seems better. It had more substance, everything now seems so lackluster and boring.
People are becoming less of what they were created to be. 😒😰
Agreed
@@MrWhiteav6 true, dont know why, but these old docs give me chills and more ...
Thank you. It was nice to relive a moment that I shared with my family years ago. My dad saw to it that we were interested in the things that went on around us. At that age...I would have missed it had it not been for him and my mom!❤️
Incredible moon mission. I wasn't born in that era but I am inspired by this mission, Astronauts and Great thanks for Dr. Wernher von braun he proved nothing is impossible for Human....
go look what he got written onhis headstone at his grave ... nasa is an occult masonic govt power house .. go work out what nasa means .. its missing 1 leter and as in occult , inverted (preversion and deception is the 3 of occult .. go learn who started it and their beliefs .. all isnt at it seems .. what was apollo god of ..
Going to the moon was a miracle back in 1960's . Thanks to the team of scientists , Astronuats and to the whole team of nasa to make this dream come true . Thanks to the goverment of America who provided the funds to make this mission impossible , possible . And in the last but not the least , many many Thanks to RUclipsr for sharing these rare videos with us .
And a huge, huge thanks to Stanley Kubrick!
The budget for Gemini and Apollo was astronomical.
@@patricksmith4424 The very best evidence is that these missions were in direct competition with Russia. Russia was watching this mission unfold in detail, they had a satellite orbiting the moon at the time, they coordinated with NASA to ensure the two missions would not interfere with one another. Russia had kicked our butts at nearly every step of the space race until the moon mission. That was the finish line. They had every motive to expose the US if we faked it. They didn't. In fact they acknowledged the accomplishment. Also, other missions (of other countries) have photographed the landing sights and they show clear evidence of our missions to those locations. The question is, do the nay sayers have credible evidence to dispute that we went. So far they do not. They speak from paranoid delusions about conspiracies that are too complicated to actually work. We are talking about a government that has a big problem with keeping even small secrets for very long. This one would be impossible. This is not unlike the old days, when you would travel across the country by wagon. It took months. And then someone arrives by new fangled train, something you aren't familiar with, and they were only on the train a week. To you, someone who never heard of a train, that would seem impossible, it took you months when you did it. But, as you learn how the train works it makes sense. Same here. Once you do a bit of learning about how all the pieces of the rocket and orbits work, it makes a lot more sense. Don't be ignorant please do some research and study, OK?
@@ongabriendocaminos2197you know nothing
I didn't know about the memorial they left on the Moon to all the astronauts and cosmonauts who had died. A very nice touch.
Just something you can search for and never find.
@@chriscoast2coast1207 Everything regarding Apollo is in the American public domain. There are billions of documents, including declassified documents, debriefings. scientific papers, physical evidence, etc. The hoax is complete nonsense and has never been debated outside of the internets silly hoax, myth, pseudoscience, paranormal, sci-fi, etc forums, websites, hoax videos.etc.
4:07
The erosion factors that can only arise from moisture and air erosion also occur on the moon in the Apollo 15 flight
RIP🌹 27 🌹
@@tammywhitaker963
4:07 apollo 15 fakes
Man is the living miracle of God . Man went to the moon with his own efforts , without the help of angels . Thank God for making Man so powerful .
Took a lot of men
Thanks very much for the great real documentary about the moon landing 1972 . I really love this .
Me too.
Great for educational purposes thank you for sharing these important moon videos God bless 👏✌👍
These gentlemen are true heroes! It would be a true honor to shake their hands!
These acts make me proud of being human!
Only 4 of the 12 moonwalkers are still alive, and only 1 still alive was a mission commander. Better not waste time, if your goal is to shake their hands.
These men were fantastic Liars.
@@hotheadedjoelhaha
I keep asking you, and you keep ignoring the question... how's your drug habit going lately? Have you gotten past the 8 hour mark yet? Can you go 8 hours without getting high yet? Or, are you still stuck at 6 hours?
@@rockethead7 Keep dreaming.
@@hotheadedjoelhaha
4 hours?
Awesome. Very inspirational. God bless Dave Scott, Al Worden, and Jim Irwin. Thank you, gentlemen, for your service.
First saw this on satellite TV on a German channel that would play them on a loop at night about 20 years ago. Was called 'spacenight'. Inspirational stuff! 👍❤️😊
Sure wish I had been old enough to appreciate these amazing Apollo missions, exploration at it's most thrilling and awe inspiring - what the hell have we done since that compares ?
We've managed to breed and raise a bunch of non thinking idiots who know nothing other than what they're told to think by fake videos that pander to their feelings that they are 100% convinced are the truth.
Freaking pitiful.
Its fake dummy
You didn't miss anything. It was all FAKE!
@@scottmitchell358 Get a life
@@scottmitchell358 Isn't it amazing how people can watch these videos and just be in awe at the beauty of what they perceive to be the moon, yet when I watch them, I think to myself what is preventing these people from seeing how fake this looks! Even the dialogue between the astronaut's sound like something you would hear on a Leave it to Beaver episode. How long can NASA keep this charade going? I know NASA has a great excuse for never having stars in any of the shots but not one picture of the sun ever? Seriously? A lot of people don't like some of the things Bart Sibrel did, especially when he tricked some of the astronauts in to doing interviews under false pretenses but I'm glad he did. Astronauts Gone Wild proved these guys were all liars. If they had really went to the moon, then they would never have acted the way they did. NASA deceived an entire world and is still laughing all the way to the bank.
We have had thousands of years of dreaming before it and fifty years after this small window of time when some people of the earth traveled to the moon.
It’s a damn shame that so many want to just call it fake instead of studying and marveling at the rare opportunity.
At this point I think what would be best is if instead of trying to go to Mars they just went back to the moon and land right near the old landing sites to prove to everyone they really happened. Otherwise when they go to Mars people will just say it was fake too.
Agreed, I think there are many things about the moon they still won't tell us, some very weird nasa images\documents
Been to the Moon... MARS. New Horizons 🚀🇺🇲
The Genesis Rock.
Men have been dreaming of going to the moon since the days of Jules Verne, and even before. It came to a head with two nations competing to get there first, then it came to a halt. Why? Answer, because one of them made it there and did it . They also found out there isn't a whole lot there except a lot of DUST which makes it the most inhospitable place ever. I understand that once they opened the door of their hospital operating room sanitary lunar lander and tracked that dust in it was like the equivalent of opening up a big bag of fiberglass dust and throwing it all over.
I think that alone may have been a large part of the reason they stopped going there.
Besides that, low earth orbit became much, much more important.
When I was a kid they taught us that we would have to build a big space station before going to the moon, as it turns out we went to the moon first then built space stations.
@@tammywhitaker963 What do you mean by Genesis Rock
Im not convinced. I just cannot believe anything anymore. There are soo many questions id like to ask.... Only time will tell.
No one cares that you’re wrong. I’m ok with it if you are.
Consider that transmission delay "it's coming very loose there..." at 15:57. You can hear it repeated in the astronaut's headset. About 2 seconds of delay. Exactly the needed time it takes for radio signals to travel from the Earth to the Moon.
Astounding Amazing and Beautiful ! Really enjoying watching the footage from this exciting time. Im 58 and haven't seen this for a very long time. Thank you so much for posting xx
Thank you for uploading this. I was able to embed it onto my Outer Space page. Gave me chills to watch.
In diversi filmati di queste missioni apollo si vedono i due astronauti di turno fikmati con zoomate o spostamentilaterali della telecamera!! Come e' possibile questo?? A quel tempo non esistevano ancora telecamere comandate a distanza senza filo!!! Kubrick placet
I appreciated the memorial at 26:50 for all those who gave their lives in space travel, including the Soviet astronauts. They were just as brave as NASA's crew.
Names on the plaque;
Charles A. Bassett II
Pavel I. Belyayev
Roger B. Chaffee
Georgi Dobrovolsky
Theodore C. Freeman
Yuri A. Gagarin
Edward G. Givens Jr.
Virgil I. Grissom
Vladimir Komarov
Viktor Patsayev
Elliot M. See Jr.
Vladislav Volkov
Edward H. White II,
Clifton C. Williams Jr.
Gave their lives for space travel ? You are having a laugh aren't you ?
@Hal 9000 Twat
@Hal 9000 a) Nothing you said was true so why would I be hurt?
b) Why would anyone be hurt by a comment on the internet?
c) You childish comments just reinforce my assessment of you.
I dont think any humans have died in space..just reentry
It's amazing to me that we did all this so long ago and haven't been back.. Yet... Great video, thanks
Intentionally haven't gone back in my opinion, disclosure is happening now with all of the UFO sightings. Governments can't conceal it any longer now that everyone has phones with excellent cameras
My respect to all the space pioneers that took part in those dangerous missions to enlarge our horizon of knowledges. It is a shame to think that everything was a long time fake. Such approach disregards the hard work of thousand people involved in those beautiful projects.
Thanks for sharing. Just recently saw the Apollo NASA Exhibit at the SC State Museum. Crazy ENERGY in there that day.🇺🇲🚀🎵🌌⏳✌️
They were all Great ! But Dave Scott has always been my favorite ! Awesome pilot , astounding astronaut , & amazing human being !
It was nice to relive a moment that I shared with my family years ago. My dad saw to it that we were interested in the things that went on around us. At that age...I would have missed it had it not been for him and my mom!❤
I realize that 1960's technology was more advance than today's. But despite this, I find it strange that no astronaut at any moment, mentions how hot/ cold it feels considering the temperatures out there. Or at the very least hear some praise about how well the space suit's liquid hydrogen refrigerating circuit combined with the micro particular lead covered nanoporous breathable polyethylene textile works
Lol. It was all a scam. Money is the root of all evil.
The issue with temperature it that there’s no atmosphere, so the extreme temp. was only on their feet
Actually, Aldrin on Apollo 11 mentions this very fact about 40 minutes into his EVA. So once again, another “mystery” resolved.
@@anonymousgoogle8462
..... 4 yrs later. 🫵😆
The only scam was your education (lack of it)
To the nay sayers who still think it was all fake, its in the geniuses world record book, you can't fake them. For the stupid x- generation Google it. I remember watching Apollo 15 on CBS network on my brand new RCA 25 inch color console TV. I also remember watching Walter Cronkite on this mission. You can't fake uncle Walter.
So you swallowed the bait hook line and sinker. You go ahead and believe whatever you have to so you can make it through your day. The rest of us are not falling for the bullshit. I suppose you trust the government 100%
Wow. I thought I’d seen and read it all but apparently not. The hammer feather drop is beautiful and I am sad I’m seeing it now for the first time at 43. And the memorial plaque and little figurine: wow. Just wow. Don’t think I’ve even seen a pic of it in all the space books
I read growing up. Remarkable!
i aint a looker, thats for sure
My my... Even a 1970s....I love it... So nostalgic.... So great... But again... It is from you ...... Your amazing Mr. H...❤️😁👌👍
Came just for the comments!!
@Brian S "Me too ",I came to tell people "science is provable"."And libraries are still free" NASA can't lie, even if they wanted too, we would catch them. Of course, all the internet scientists are sure they're smarter than the 375,000 men and women who worked for the 20,000 NASA subcontractors during the 12 year Apollo program..LOL
9:01 A truly spectacular view of the rille! 🙂
From Dave Scott's essay in National Geographic, September 1973:
“The rover functions impeccably as we ride from site to site, accumulating fragments of history. We bounce and pitch across omnipresent chuckhole-like craters. The motion exactly resembles that of a small boat in a rough sea; so does the effect. Incredible as it seems in the arid environment of the moon, seasickness could become an occupational hazard.”
I remember that story in NG. It was a side piece to the expansive coverage of the Apollo 17 mission. A wonderful, yet sad bow out of National Geographic's long coverage of the future, present and now past moon missions.
@@brianarbenz7206 They really did a good job of covering the space program up through the early seventies. Most of what I knew about the Apollo program back then was what I learned from their excellent articles and pictures and the detailed and interesting articles by Kenneth Weaver.
"Man must explore"
James Erwin described in his book ‘To Rule the Night’ that he put up an array of 300 glass reflectors. This Laser Reflector device is still being used today by astronomers on earth to shine laser, reflected back for precise distance ranging. This can sense distance change of earth surfaces for earthquake detection.
I tried to watch as much as i could. CBS aired most of the major activity on the moon,but they did not show this stuff. I had just joined the Army in 1971.
No camera can capture how beautiful the moon lookd
Lol
next time, we can just take a Tesla model X along. I wonder if it will fit in a Dragon V-2 capsule?
Ahh, dragon, V-3, of course!
How eerie/weird, 14 dead on that plaque then their would be 14 more deaths later in the two Shuttle disasters. Co-incidence? Great video,thank you. Ken
Well...what can we said, being astronauts is about dead first live later... Failure is die, succeed is live, thats all.
I am really happy that I have seen the real thing on TV from 11 to 17
Great content! Thanks for the memories!
At 20:54 there are tire tracks veering off to the right of the rever. They forgot to bring the zamboni...bologna.
Um, bologna? Zamboni? What ARE you talking about?
rockethead7 .. A zamboni is an ice resurfacing machine. And you berate other people for not doing research?
@@Iam_Dunn
Yes, dummy, I know what a Zamboni machine is. What does that have to do with the moon landings?
There was obviously a practice run across the set that left the tire track marks.
They failed to blend the joy ride practice run tire tracks into the virgin surface of the moon.
Zamboni...boligna
MOUNT HADLEY
W. Who does remember when Apollo 15 landed, by high art and skill,
H. Here on a plain by the Moon's own Apennines, near Hadley Rille?
E. "Ecce Mons Apenninus Lunae!": "Behold MOUNT HADLEY afar!", a chosen Site!
N. Note IRWIN climbing down those coppern-gold rungs to say: "Oh, Boy!...What a Site!"
A. As I remember well those Days, the golden hues of excellence indeed
P. Prevailed when SCOTT did say, "MAN MUST EXPLORE!" to satisfy his need.
O. Onward the Rover drove, on moonscape-fields of football-sized strewn rocks,
L. Laid bare midst curving powdery snow drifts, as SCOTT to IRWIN talks.
L. Likewise JOE ALLEN spoke through microphone as Houston's Voice:
O. "O, Get good rocks as sample stones into gem-bags of choice!"
F. From nearby Crater fills some diamonds in the goldlink necklace!
I. Is not that Rover ride a wondrous tour of Lunar Mystery's Face?
F. From Falcon's landing point upon Palus Putredinis, Marsh of Decay,
T. To exploration's height: sunlit MOUNT HADLEY high, a deep assay.
E. Exclaims JIM IRWIN to DAVE SCOTT, right at the argent Peak upon
E. Egressing by: "DAVE, from whence my "HELP!"? From Houston too, anon:
N. Nostalgic memory in scenic melody now echoes back from lunar hills!
W. When Rock of Genesis: The Gem of expedition's win a Quest fulfills.
A. And Galileo's vindicating test by falcon feather's fall and SCOTT'S hammer too:
S. Seen going down to simultaneous end-gravity field's proven true!
H. Has Hadley's Legacy been fully understood upon Decay's Touchdown?
E. Even properly construed over its own significance to us in town?
R. Resolve to end urban decay-moral decay, pthisis all, and more: all others conquer too!
E. Ever reverse Dekay's effects on U: Behold yon Hadley's Help to You!
I, A.S.K. ( I,Albert Stephen Kundrat) I Ask for anyone to read my Poem here-on!
"ASK not What your Country can do for You, ASK what You can do for your Country!"- President John F, Kennedy
Note : "HELP!" from the Beatle's Album : "HELP! I need somebody's Help, not just anybody's HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP! HELP!.. My Independence seem to vanish in the Haze. Will U please, please HELPMME!
At 22:50 just before start, there are visible 2 stars and something odd in upper left conner of the screen? It is very strange to say the least.
Przemyslaw Buska something odd? Part of the vehicle the camera is mounted on.
Thinking the "stars" are probably junk (dust) on the lens, common in photography. You can see when the astronauts are moving around deploying scientific equipment (like cameras) the stuff is flying everywhere, and all over their suits. When backlit, small (very thin), and semi transparent, this happens a lot.
Moon dust may ultimately be one of the biggest obstacles to "living" there, believe it or not (mark my words). It is not dust, as we think of it, weathered and round, it is more like VERY tiny shards of glass, a large percentage of it (ejecta), and it gets into EVERYTHING. The astronauts can be heard complaining about it, and the impossibility of keeping it out of the vehicle in several vids and transcriptions, and spent a LOT of time trying to "house keep" it away.
Think more volcanic ash than dust we are used to dealing with, which can destroy machinery it gets into, and that is picked up electrostatically by everything (tools, boots, suits, gloves, machinery, etc.) and sticks to everything it comes in contact with.
If I remember correctly they even removed their moon excursion suits and left them behind in the discarded LM upper stage, before they entered the command module for return to Earth, to try to keep the dangerous mess (even to lungs) out of that vehicle (maybe not, but I seem to remember that, obviously they'd have to have more than one suit each to do that, again, not sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if the moon expeditionary suits were of different design than the command module suits, since they would HAVE to be if the backpacks were integral, again, don't remember).
The upper left is some piece of equipment. They left scientific instruments there in every mission.
The greatest show of the americans. Pity there was no Netflix those days.
This place will definitely be a popular spot for future exploration
Fully grown scientist tinkering around with projection screens and plastic models. When the fun was over, they were probably in some backroom smoking cigars and playing cards having a big laugh about it.
No, that would be the conspiracy theorists at the expense of people like you.
@11:00 the astronaut starts an experiment to throw the packaging; when he loses his footing and starts falling down. He puts his hand down to catch himself; and doesn't even appear to touch the lunar sand; but somehow miraculously lurches upwards & lands upright on his feet again...How can you honestly NOT call BS on that?
So you notice that also. Exactly what I thought. 😆
He clearly used the tool in his right hand to help catch his fall. You can see the dirt clearly fly out from it. The space suit he’s wearing is also highly pressurized, which obviously assisted in rebounding to its pressured state as he got that low to the surface. But fun for you, though, picking out a tiny little thing you can’t explain and using that to decide the whole thing was faked!
@@shlubydub lol. Yeah buddy this was all fake 🙄
Why is thsre thick shadows from rocks on yhe ground yet none from the hills next to them?
So you're suggesting maybe the "thick" rock shadows were painted there, or something? What is a thick shadow, as opposed to a thin one?
@@MrJdsenior i mean thick as in. Size. Of shadow.
Yes shadows would always be thick, by your definition, as they were always there at lunar morning.
Radio signals are directional or line of sight. To receive a satellite signal to watch SkyTV the small dish, about 90cm in diameter on your house, must be pointed directly at the satellite which is stationed at a geosynchronous orbit. The satellite relays TV signals from a ground station and transmits the signal back down to the earth surface. Everyone knows that if the dish is moved even slightly the TV signal is lost. The same goes for the radio, telemetry signals transmitted from the moon during the Apollo landings. The transmitted signal strength was about 20 watts which required a large dish on earth to receive a clean signal. There were various dishes pointed at the moon receiving these signals as it orbited around the earth; Jodrell Bank, Parkes in Australia and Goonhilly down. The Russians were also monitoring the signals using the multiple array antenna dishes at North Station. Radio hams were also able to detect the VHF signals of the Astronauts conversation...
www.arrl.org/eavesdropping-on-apollo-11
Baysinger says that on the night of the Apollo 11 landing, he and Rutherford had to essentially aim the antenna at the Moon by getting behind
it and sighting it like a gun. This was difficult since the weather was cloudy and the Moon not easily visible. The antenna, which was originally built for
Baysinger’s radio astronomy work, had a motorized steering mechanism but it had to be manually guided. Its “beam” or “field of view” was such that, once pointed at the Moon, it could be let go for a little while, but pretty soon it would have to be re-aimed because the motions of the Earth and Moon caused the Moon to drift out of the antenna’s field and the signal to be lost. In fact, this was one piece of evidence that the Apollo 11 signals the receiver picked up were indeed from the Moon - if the antenna was not kept aimed at the Moon, the signal disappeared. Baysinger’swife and daughter watched the Apollo 11 landing on TV while Baysinger and Rutherford listened via Baysinger’s equipment. The signal on the home-built equipment came through approximately 5-10 seconds earlier than the signal on TV. It was noisy, but you could hear what was going on.
So if they never landed on the moon can someone please explain how the US managed to fake the radio and telemetry data as coming from the moon ?
The movie "The Dish" is about an Australian receiving station charged with receiving the landing video feed for 11.
Apollo 11 only had a quad dish array and like you say has to be pointing to Earth to within 2 degrees to be picked up from any of the large arrays here on Earth, which again as you say the motions of the Earth and moon would make it impossible to have a continouse signal, using the website www.everythingrf.com you will work out that the 20 watts fed into the quad array would not detectable, when you feed in 200 watts it was possible only if in perfect alignment, for Baysinger to receive VHF signal would be impossible with his equipment so its best to ignore this story, probably was paid to tell it, look up FSPL (free space path loss) It is well documented that a signal decreases in a way that is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source, another way to express this is the signal = 1 divided by distance squared. (inverse square law)
Great stuff ......a rather lighthearted mentioning here about the jolly fanfare music during a white nuckle Lem ascend from the Moon , which later was considered controversial , the loud music which could interfere with concentration during this dangerous phase, when the astronauts should be able to hear each other and Capcom.
Houston wasn't happy about that at all. Which ofcourse emerged years later.
Покажите ту камеру или её описание её характеристик, которая снимала этот старт. Она должна иметь автоматическую фокусировку и систему удержания снимаемого объекта в кадре. То есть, она должна иметь электропривод на фокусировке и привод для изменения угла съемки по вертикали. При этом должна быть электроника для управлением работой этих приводов с соответствующими алгоритмами, процессором и памятью. На весь процесс управления, из 36 секундного ролика, остаётся всего несколько секунд.
В то время никаких процессоров еще не было и кинокамеры управлялись с Земли. Они имели полный электропривод. Некоторые, которые были установлены на Аполлоне 11 этого не имели.
8:20 - 8:45 The shadow of the rover's dish antenna doesn't change as the rover rolls across the surface at a good clip. How far away would a stage light have to be to leave a shadow like that?
93 million miles away.
Why the fuck are people discrediting it? There has been 6 lunar landings, so much evidence out there regarding the design and development of the apollo missions. How could it have been impossible to land on the moon? It all makes sense how they managed to do it, there is so much information that it cannot be discredited. You're too stupid to understand how they did it, so your only conclusion is that it was faked. Read about it, learn about it and draw your own conclusion. I have and it seems very credible that it happened, and yes they has the technology (just about) to pull it off.
@@EinkOLED You apparently failed to realize that Deploracle is on your side. Read again. He said the light source is 93 million miles away, which goes AGAINST the moon hoax nutbags who think that this is a studio.
I was confused too. I've never studied shadows much, but can never recall seeing one in varying monotone, like its a photo. I've always seen them in black or nothing. Another thing, the moon surface is shot in monotone, yet the image has a camera covered in the usual gold foil in front of everything.
@@tonymak9213 weird, Don't you think ?
9:53-9:59 that is mind BLOWING!!
bubble helmets 😂😂😂😂
Most beautiful thing he’s ever seen. It’s just a beautiful little valley 🤔
Those are some big mountains...🧐
I might could of been there longer. Kind of an unproven thing to say at the time.
It's so true if you think about it... No one has ever seen that rock, nor touched it...
Of course I can explain why the ISS can fly with a horizontal attitude: It can fly with a horizontal attitude because it has an orbital speed which allows to create a centrifugal force which counters the earth attraction.
When the LM is near the moon with a low horizontal speed, it no longer benefits of this centrifugal force; and, unlike a plane on earth, it does not benefit of the air lift either; so it has to counter the lunar attraction with its engine.
16:20 - 16:39 At this point you can prove the moon landing was real. The two oscillating parts below and to the left of the camera would behave differently at the speed at which they were driving if they were driving with the atmosphere present. If there was an atmosphere, the wind would have pushed it backwards.
Right can only do that on the moon 😂
..so really the first creature to actually "touch " the Moon was a falcon.. ..albeit a part of one...
At :58 Nice tunnel entrance that everyone likes to talk about since they first saw it !?!?
Dale Rogers. You can pull up high-resolution images of the tunnel. NASA as well as the German space agency and Arizona State University have used NASA's LROC spacecraft .to map and study the Moon. The Germans and Arizona state operated the LROC independently of NASA on their own money. In other words , the German space agency and ASU had control over the spacecraft and cameras,etc..I'm not clear on how Arizona state worked with NASA.I imagine NASA might have reduced the fees being this was a teaching university in American.
So if you have a computer and some software, [photoshop is excellent ] you can blow up and crop detailed images of the tunnel. I haven't pulled up any images, but beware the tiff files are huge files. You can now examine the Moons geology, Apollo, Soviet, China,etc landing sites , etc in amazing detail.
"You're the most brave people on the moon and my heroes on our planet earth! "Thank you, and God Bless you!" My heroes!
My favorite Apollo crew. David Scott had such class. All three were more about duty than personal ego.
I used that same Plutarch quote to conclude my high school graduation speech, I had wanted to use it ever since I first saw this documentary.
At 25:00 the Soviets actually assist the mission by helping the U.S.A. track Pulsars after the mission pointed a special XRay spectrometer into far space.
I'd listen to these two cosmonauts... who say that the earth is flat: ruclips.net/video/-DlvWoZLBHs/видео.html
- and that space doesn't exist - or we've never been there: ruclips.net/video/ipDfJwkmkj8/видео.html
Then I would take some time - as long as it takes - to research Flat Earth, and Nasa's fakery... Enjoy!
J. Larsen lmao. The education system has really failed
@@JLar-bb5hl "earth is flat because why not, fuck you"
-J lar 2021
Oh no, I just saw something that tells me we've been had.
And it's a big secret so you're not going to tell anyone.... right? :-)
Some peeps will believe Anything yet in nothing but fibberonius
Nature and Physics A NASA excursion to Antarctica was done prior to 1969 to collect lunar samples from meteorites. This is common knowledge. Not necessarily proof of the landing.
@@DA-sv2iw - It is only "common knowledge" to conspiracy theorists who make false claims about Von Braun's Antarctica expedition, knowing that certain people would believe them without question.
Lunar meteorites were first identified in 1982, *10 years after the last Apollo mission!* Until then, there was only speculation among a few that such meteorites could exist, but no-one had identified them to prove it.
After years of analysis of the rocks/samples returned by Apollo and the tiny amount of moon samples returned by the USSR, features unique to moon rock were identified. So in 1982, when analysis of a meteorite revealed the *same* features, it proved for the first time that a meteorite originated from the moon.
Therefore unless Von Braun was a time traveller who went back to the 60s, there's no way he or anyone else could have known about lunar meteorites, much less identify them among all the other meteorites (and why would a rocket scientist rather than a geologist be sent to collect fake 'moon rocks' among meteorites?).
Today, only about 100 pounds of lunar meteorites have been identified worldwide since their discovery in 1982, whereas Apollo returned 840 pounds of moon rocks/samples, including core samples up to 9 feet long!
But that's not all, *meteorites have a very violent history!* Travelling significantly faster than any bullet, meteoroids enter earth's atmosphere which causes them to heat up until they glow white hot, where the molten outer layers are stripped away as they tear through our atmosphere. If any rock is left to reach the surface, it _smashes_ into the earth.
Hence there's a *huge difference* between meteorites and the pristine moon rocks picked up from the moon's surface with their intricate microscopic surface detail still intact. Therefore even the most inexperienced geologist would not mistake a meteorite for a moon rock, much less experienced geologists throughout the world.
In other words, the claim that Von Braun or ANYONE went to Antarctica to collect 'moon rocks' during the 60s is nonsense on many levels :-)
We have so much potential with that big rock up there. I really hope (in the name of science) the moon becomes our next hub into the galaxy for the greater good of mankind
I think now we know there is water there is going to make things much more viable.
It's not only disrespectful to the astronauts to accuse NASA of a conspiracy but also immensely insulting to the more than 400,000 people that ultimately made the missions possible.
JaysCyYoung1 400,000 morons who had no idea they were talking to astronauts in the desert.
Insult to the public socialism nwo good ole boy system. Had to change
man it makes me feel bad for the flat earth folks and there lack of understanding.( no wonder they are all so grumpy)... this is fantastic... To grasp what we did.. I am just glad that I was old enough to watch every launch from the first mercury to the last apollo and the first few space shuttles... It was an exciting time.. thanks for that share guys.. it brought back some good memories...
The LEM "taking off" from the Moon was awesome-sauce
I wonder who took that film as it went up and up, the camera following the capsule;
WHO took that shot???
Tom, in service to Christ I think that's the same news crew that filmed the first lem landing on the moon. They must also be the ones who took video ABOVE the orbiter as it sped around the room. Those people have never received an ounce of credit.🤣
@@jonathanshaw3755 everything about Nasa is space-fakery and the astronomical theft of American money
Thank stanley Kubrick
@Thane Mac no it's not common knowledge; why hasn't it been used since then?
lmao wow pay attention at 18:35 to around 18:52. Watch how the lightsource is movied over the astronauts heads to light them up better, this cannot be explain as the aperture of the camera opening wider to make it brighter, because when that happens the surrounding terrain because out of focus and blurry, watch when the light gets brighter you can distinctly still see every distinguishable hole and rock on the ground, and also note the glare on the rocorder, you can clearly see the lightsource
Maybe they went to a different moon, certainly not earth's moon.
Well, comment is nine years old and you might be dead but, another more reasonable explanation is that light was reflecting off their extraordinarily bright white spacesuits back into the camera, brightening the surroundings.
he said it was equipped with a camera to track the star patterns. I've never seen any stars from iss or moon pics.
The answer is exposure time. As stars are dim and the foreground is bright, you have to adjust the camera exposure. Your smartphone does the same automatically. To photograph dimmer stars you'd need an exposure time of several minutes.
stonerlemonblues thank you And I appreciate the response. with all due respect I today just found out that they equipped Apollo 11 I believe with a camera specifically for photographing the stars. I actually heard the video from 1969 I believe it was. but. they still didn't manage to get one pic of them.
flim flam Apollo 16 had an UV Camera and photographer the stars with it. Check, There are pictures on the net.
@flim flam We equipped them with everything, including very high res 70mm still cameras (even under modern standards) and even with a high rez 16mm cinema camera. What we see is blur. Hammer and feather fall at the same time. The only problem: it is all blur and the feather can be, at a push, seen to bounce back twice(!) before the head of the hammer touches the soil. It's nice to say that most of the photos are lost. The same applies to Russian (Soviets) - tons of footage from their lunokhods (lunar rovers) seem to be lost. Very convenient. One day a spacecraft will go near these landings or even land there. It must happen, hopefully. But I no longer believe in justice. Most photos with stars and many videos are only recent. They were never there back in the day. Once again, the arguments of _lost or not released_ are used.
Cool lvid.. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
I got into that ! It's a must watch for the week in us all
Lindo trabalho.
Parabéns sempre NASA.
Sim, parabens com o fakery! I'd listen to these two cosmonauts... who say that the earth is flat:ruclips.net/video/-DlvWoZLBHs/видео.html
- and that space doesn't exist - or we've never been there: ruclips.net/video/ipDfJwkmkj8/видео.html
Then I would take some time - as long as it takes - to research Flat Earth, and Nasa's fakery... Enjoy!
I giggle everytime I watch this! I would like to Major Matt Mason.
The name Hadley Scott can't be a coincidence.
What a great show. Kubrick was a legend for a reason
I agree, what a great show. I suspect Kubric did apollo 11,12 in the UK, showed them how to do it and they did the other 5 in the US. Maybe that's why 13 was a cock up. The transition was not running smoothly so they had to abandon the moon shots. More grease for the gantry anyone!
Kubrick was a perfectionist and insisted shooting the film on location, which just happened to be on the Moon
Awesome!👏👏👏
Thanks Airboyd
thank you so much for shareing . i never seen that before and it was great
LMG YOU'RE BORN AFTER 2000 .. IT'S ALL A SCRIPTED MOVIE.. IT'S THROWN AT SOCIETY ALL DAY ..UP TO YOU WAKE UP..SPACE MAY BE THE FINAL FRONTIER BUT IT'S MADE IN A HOLLYWOOD BASEMENT...
At 22:50 LEM blast off, debris flied straight out as it in vacuum, it will not be like that on earth.
that seems impossible to determine
@@tominservicetochrist5441 a\~1~~
@@tominservicetochrist5441 except a vacuum chamber maybe?
@@achilles6578 good thought, but it'd have to be a b-i-g vacuum chamber, no?
@@tominservicetochrist5441 to determin debris flies str8 out in a vacuum? Well yes but they have big ones. Especially the 1 in ohio
if you look at in slow mo the hammer hits first, and in every scene the rover camera is tilted down and its suposed to be controlled by Huston
fake gravity!!
Given how far technology has advanced, this kind of thing should be routine and happening on a weekly basis.
The fact that something is possible to do does not mean it is useful, economic, or logical to do again.
@@jmrico1979 So how were they able to fund it back then and not now?
@@k.s.333 Back then I believe congress assigned Nasa's funding. Apparently those congressmen thought beating the russians to the moon was a matter of the utmost national importance. Now, the thinking has changed. There's no reason to spend billions in doing something that you have already done and delivers virtually 0 return.
@@jmrico1979 I highly doubt going to the moon "delivers virtually 0 return".
@@k.s.333 Well. I myself would agree with you there. What I meant was, in the eyes of US Congress, it delivers 0 return. It's the same thinking that pulled the plug on the shuttle program.
I looooved this video
AWESOME !!! What more can you say ???
Gullible much?
@@yomommaahotoo264 Hush. Your ignorant comment is that of a Troll.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 Aha!
A Bot Shill
@@yomommaahotoo264
@@yomommaahotoo264 dickhead much?
This is great footage. I hope when they launch in 2024 they’ll get extra HD footage
LOLOLOLOLOL You government worshipping slack jawed mouth breathing fool.
It's been a half century now since the apollo hoaxes. Keep praying to our government God and maybe....just maybe someone will eventually make it to the moon on the next century or two.
@@yomommaahotoo264 Hey Yo', Why chew gotta be such a dousche bag ???? Life's to short for that kinda nonsense !!! You really need to learn to love Uncle Sam !!!
@@sumbeech1484 And I will.....the minute they start obeying and protecting our constitution, stop with the false flag wars, abolish their exclusive unconstitutional immunities, and own up to it's past criminality.
@@yomommaahotoo264 I'm with you on the wars, we've spilled enough blood and money. It's time we worry about America and the American people. But we did go to the Moon nine times and 9/11 was a terrorist attack over our continued aggression and support of those in the Mid East that Al Qaeda, considered enemies.
@@Godscountry2732 OBL and the hijackers were patseys and any footage our on-the-take corporate owned media showed was in different airports BEFORE 911.
The WTC buildings were planted with nano thermate. It was a demolition.....all done because Saddam Hussein threatened to dump basing his oil production on the petro dollar, which would domino and cause a collapse of our fiat printed world dollar standard.
No one including all of the Space Shuttle missions have ever been beyond the Van Allen radiation belts because of the deadly radiation of outer space. Without the earth's magnetic fields there would be no life on earth, and likewise if man were sent beyond those protective magnetic belts.
We cannot send into space the weight of lead or water necessary to shield us from that deadly radiation no matter what Star Trek movies said.
It was....and still is a hoax that anyone ever did...or probably ever will travel beyond the Van Allen radiation belts, no matter what a bunch of well paid nasa and government parrots instruct our on-the-take media to tell us.
the mountains are so lovely they forgot to turn the cameras so that we could see them (instead of looking at the bloody ground!) you can describe anything to the listening public without the pictures to back them up.
I don't know why my post is not visible now. Maybe it's because I included around a dozen links to the photographs that you think don't exist. Anyway, the answer is that they took hundreds of photos of the mountains. It's true that they verbally described the mountains in a stand-up EVA from the top hatch of the LEM, prior to the first EVA when they climbed out onto the surface. They hadn't yet set up a TV video camera for the ground based geologists to be able to see what they were seeing, so in the meantime, they verbally described them instead. Is that what you're referring to? But, anyway, the bottom line is that they took hundreds of photos of the mountains on Apollo 15, and thousands in total across all of the mission photography. I don't know why you're saying that they "forgot to turn the cameras." You have ZERO understanding of this topic.
@@rockethead7 pls answer my question: Why are you so mean to other people ? Are you choleric? I think so.
@@SpaceTime773
After your ridiculous nonsense you've repeatedly spewed at me, you don't get to complain.
@@rockethead7 nonsense ? What do you mean ?
@@SpaceTime773
I'm not playing this game with you.
People calling it fake, I'd really like to hear what a real one would look like...
What are those white dots on the black background at 20:30?
Maybe reflection of the sunlight.
It's lens flare. That's where the light bounces back and forth in a lens a few times, creating white spots like that. Most photographers or movie makers try to avoid it. Some (i.e. J.J. Abrams) actually want lens flare. Here's one example of photographic lens flare:
i.ytimg.com/vi/iLo8aMKr7E4/maxresdefault.jpg
Notice they never pan around to see around them..NEVER
What is your feeble-assed point, pray tell ?
You're wrong. 100% bullshit. There are several times that the rover camera does a 360 degree pan around. Go watch ALL of the videos, not just the ones other conspiratards spoon-feed you.
@@rockethead7 send us a link.....????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? YOU NAIVE FUCKING TOOL
@@brietebank9582 🤣
@@rockethead7 still waiting for that link there rockhead🎱....i mean rockethead7...my bad.....you damage control dis info bum.....foh
JUST TO INFORM THE YOUNGER GENERATION.............THE APOLLO PROGRAM WAS THE GREATEST TECHNICAL PROJECT IN HISTORY.............AND ALWAYS WILL BE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The biggest hoax
The feather and the hammer debunks all moon hoaxer theories...awesome video! Thanks for posting...
.....er...no. At that height and with no air resistance - that would happen. From a greater height - the hammer would start to accelerate as its denser. You don't need to (fake) go the moon to show that. We did it in primary school with vacuum chamber. Shows how desperate they and you are to try to qualify nonsense. Simple.
@@viclimited9081 er no... your comment just proves you're an idiot. Learn a little bit about acceleration due to gravity
Where did they get the fuel to travel 240,000 miles there and 240,000 miles back? 🤔
Huh? You do know that most of the Saturn V was fuel, right? It weighed about 6.5 million pounds. About 5.5 million of those pounds were fuel/oxidizer.
@@rockethead7 i think this idiot doesnt know that a rocket in space keeps moving without using the engine after being put in the right flight path. There is a vacuum, so nothing can stop the spacecraft or slow it down. Only earths gravity.
This is Soo Precious!!..I was born in 1969,..I was 2😊 BEAUTIFUL FOOTAGE🌕🚀😍
Show me the video that made us decide not to go back.
They are going back haha
What is the bright domed object by the side of the mountain in frame 3:44
mickmoonstudy cansell idk I saw other images that seemed to show just the tip of metal spheres coming out of the craters.
What do you think. UFO craft just chillin......
mickmoonstudy cansell it’s not a ”dome”. It’s just an ordinary, partially illuminated Moon hill.
@@YDDES Correct
How the backpack systems works for hours with the old battery technology?
Or they know something that we do not?
Cheers.
The battery technology was more than enough for many hours of operation. They used very high capacity (390 Watt-hour silver-zinc for Apollo 15's mission and the later ones) non-rechargeable batteries which were each good for 1 EVA. After use, they were replaced with a new fresh battery that had been retrieved from the descent stage's MESA at the end of the previous EVA, and installed before the next EVA began. The silver-zinc batteries were not rechargeable, but they did pack quite a capacity into a rather small package.
That's right they did.
Ricardo B : "Or they know something that we do not?" Apparently so - because they were professionals and spent years on research. www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/ALSJ-FlightPLSS.pdf
They knew something you don’t.
They can make batteries that last years with no recharge. Those are not the batteries offered to the general consumer because there's no commodity in batteries that last years. Phone batteries are designed to last an average of a day, to make a safer battery that will limit heat conduction and damage to the electronics internal components.
Good studio and wonderful acting 😃😃
@Thomas Pickering Thomas Pickering's mother never loved him.
Thank you for posting this. It really brings back memoriez for me.
NASA cult members just can't let go of this grown up fairy tale. I actually understand why though. If they admit it was fake, the fear of being lied to on such a grand scale is horrifying. I Sympathize with them.
But no one can ever provide any compelling evidence to suggest that the Moon landings were fake. It’s always the exact same talking points over and over and over again, which fall apart completely at the slightest scrutiny.
I sympathise with lazy uneducated clowns like you..
Where are the samples that we took away from the moon?
@FrawgyFreshOnions BS
apollo 11 had over 400 lbs of samples
@@StevEvil666 Duh.
Pretty good studio work
Lol what you don't think this landing video is real?
Pssssst. They never calculated trajectory for the 200 mph solar winds. If corse they didn’t know about them back then. Not to mention these little guys rip the edges of our atmosphere off into space. Oh ya they also are hitting the surface of the moon. Yes they are constantly moving. Oh oh ya NASA now admits we lost the technology to go back and we have to figure out how to protect astronauts from these winds. The darkness cannot comprehend the light. When the light shows up darkness runs.
To all you moon hoaxers, look at 9:28. Notice how much dust is kicking up and how far it goes despite how little effort it took to do so. This is something that could only happen in low gravity. Unless you can tell me what kind of dust, sand, or dirt moves like it's in low gravity... I guess there's no real explanation for that. And no, speeding up the footage doesn't make the dust go any less far than it does at normal speed.
Just can't describe what the hell happenned on the day Apollo 11 crew held the press conference. They look like three kids who just got cheated in a softball game and didn't get what was promised. There were not a moment of sincerity of anything coming out of an achievement of such a global scale. It felt like they had guns pointed at their heads the whole time.
1) Many people assume this press conference occurred just hours or days after they returned from the moon and therefore *expect* to see that reflected in the astronauts. But this press conference actually occurred *3 WEEKS* after they returned from the moon.
2) The astronauts were in quarantine for most of those 3 weeks, due to a policy at the time to safeguard mankind against the possibility of some kind of space virus being brought back to Earth (they scrapped that policy soon afterwards).
3) Those astronauts were ALL ex test pilots who risked their lives pushing experimental aircraft to its limits, at a time when an average of 1 test pilot per week was killed in the USA. Hence they were used to keeping their emotions under control and remaining calm and professional during the most stressful situations (that's why they were chosen for the job in the first place!).
4) This press conference was for the 3 astronauts to answer serious questions from experts in their fields, including from astronomers and scientists and engineers, and hence they were effectively at work here. Notice all the technical details and jargon mentioned. So this wasn't a press conference for the general public.
5) How happy does Neil Armstrong and the other astronauts look while in quarantine before that press conference?
*ruclips.net/video/j6P1wBNHqnU/видео.html*
How happy does Neil Armstrong appear in front of the troops in Vietnam?
*ruclips.net/video/qSKCaxx58Bg/видео.html*
So the idea that there's something wrong with the Apollo 11 astronauts during the press conference is based upon false assumptions and false expectations my friend :-)
@@yazzamx6380 So if anything they ought to be pumped and refreshed to meet the media and not look ashamed and deeply troubled.
@@yazzamx6380 Dude just accept the fact that you bought the lie and forgive yourself and go on from there. There's no need to make excuses that make zero sense. More and more people are realizing it was a lie and in the near future the majority will regard the mission as a hoax and it will die.
@@orange70383 - Except they don't look ashamed and troubled, they look like professionals at work. You are projecting your expectations onto them and then jumping to conclusions just because your expectations have not been met.
This is over 50 years old remember, so please provide a link to a credible and experienced body language expert or psychologist who claims there's something wrong with the astronauts during that press conference.
After all, do you really believe the world's best experts in various fields of the study of human behavior for 50 YEARS have ALL missed what you claim to see? :-)
@@orange70383 - You said "Dude just accept the fact that you bought the lie "
Just accept the fact that you have allowed yourself to be manipulated and controlled by conspiracy theorists.
I know men landed on the moon from ALL the evidence, including third party evidence (hence nothing to do with NASA);
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings
And before you dismiss that because it's a Wiki page, remember that the *sources* for all that information is in the reference section at the bottom of the page.
You said "More and more people are realizing it was a lie"
EVERY conspiracy believer says that, from alien abduction to flat Earth, so don't use such a poor argument please. Focus on the facts only :-)
AT 10:15 THEY ARE DRIVING ON PREVIOUSLY MADE VEHICLE TRACKS AND SAME FOOTAGE IS USED AT 16:14
@Kit Canyon lol as always with understanding a person's thought you jump to assumption and end in name calling like a child... My statement is based on the video as presented that on that day was the first time they traveled to that location yet they were traveling over alkready made tracks and when they showed that they were traveling back to the lunar lander they a portion of that clip as part of the return trip.. I said nothing about conspiracy or fake moon filmstage .
You said that. All I'm pointing out is what they say is happening in those pieces of this documentary is not it is stitched together with footage that doesn't belong in the sequence. So obviously they think to some degree that to the bone believers like your self can be and are mentally manipulated.. and I hate to burst your bubble but It is True NASA lies about many many things. One thing is for sure the extreme temperatures in troposphere can reach over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit far above the melting point of almost all the materials used in the space craft. And none of the material used can block the over extreme radiation that would cook them alive from the inside out if the actually entered the van Allen radiation belt through which the craft would have to fly through to get to the Moon, to Mars and all other space destinations. So either they went to the Moon and the Moon is in Low Earth orbit below the van Allen belt or it is actually outside Earth's orbit and no one has been to the Moon and no satellites have been to any other places in outer space because they too we're supposedly made from materials that melt below 3000 degrees Fahrenheit.. although everyone agrees that 3 men died trying to get their. Cooked like 3 hampsters in a microwave... Also Thrust does work in a closed vaccum space but is useless in a no contained open vaccum space .. things you might want to study up before calling others children or any other names.. personally though I laugh at such tactics to demean others in this way. I study things from all directions the pros and the cons
The psuedo and real science.. the applied mathematics and the observable Truth and
The stitched together "Footage" presented in a film as real in a timeline sequence that reuses the same snippets of film in different places of the documentary promoted as real untouched filn footage...the only argument you have provided so far is nothing that you have witnessed or proven on your own only "Information" you were told by or you read written by someone else ... So get a grip Skippy go out and prove on your own what is real. Than and only than can you have valid place in an honest conversation..!!. Name calling is the action if a child....
Peace out and good look in your carreer as an internet trolll
@@tmmt6549
YOU SAID: "AT 10:15 THEY ARE DRIVING ON PREVIOUSLY MADE VEHICLE TRACKS AND SAME FOOTAGE IS USED AT 16:14"
== Yes, they didn't use the 16mm camera endlessly, you know. They had only 2-3 minute canisters. So, they didn't exactly leave it running for every drive. And, the color wheel TV camera mounted to the rover didn't work while it was moving (couldn't keep the dish aimed at the Earth while moving), so for that particular footage, 16mm was all they had. Editors of these documentaries often borrow footage from other parts of the missions to fill holes in the available footage. They even sometimes take footage from other missions and patch them in. They didn't go back over their tracks the next day, like some others said in this thread. They don't know what they're talking about. Here's a map of each traverse. Yes, sometimes they rode back on the same path that they rode out on.
lunarscience.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/a15_traverse2.png
YOU SAID: "I said nothing about conspiracy or fake moon filmstage .
"
== Correct. Your original response had nothing to provoke the notion that you were saying the moon missions were faked. You were pointing out facts, and the use of footage that didn't technically belong in the sections they were presented in.
YOU SAID: "So obviously they think to some degree that to the bone believers like your self can be and are mentally manipulated."
== It's just the editing of the 3rd party editors who splice these documentaries together. The original footage is available in its entirety, and contains no such problems.
YOU SAID: "One thing is for sure the extreme temperatures in troposphere can reach over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit far above the melting point of almost all the materials used in the space craft."
== Um, yes, some of the atoms/molecules in the troposphere can get really hot. So what? Why do you think this is relevant to the melting point of the materials of the spacecraft? That's not how thermodynamics works. And, there's a reason you won't find any actual physicists making this silly statement you're making. Basically, yeah, they can be hot. But, we're counting molecules at that point. It's very close to being a perfect vacuum. I mean, let's draw an analogy. If you jump into a swimming pool with water that's 210 degrees (F), you're not going to live very long, that's going to be quite fatal. If you get a single small drop of water on you that is 210 degrees, yeah, you'll feel a bit of a burn, but it will only last a second, then you'll be fine. If you get the tiniest of tiny mists of 210 degree water sprayed on you, we're talking about less than a drop, sprayed out into small microscopic drops, you probably won't even notice it. Well, when you get up into the troposphere, sorry, but there are so few molecules/atoms at that point, it really doesn't matter how hot they are. They cannot heat up a spacecraft. This is basic thermodynamics. Entry level.
YOU SAID: "And none of the material used can block the over extreme radiation that would cook them alive from the inside out if the actually entered the van Allen radiation belt through which the craft would have to fly through to get to the Moon, to Mars and all other space destinations."
== Bull. Fucking. Shit. That is absolute crap. And, James Van Allen hated that you idiots use his name to say this nonsense.
YOU SAID: "So either they went to the Moon and the Moon is in Low Earth orbit below the van Allen belt or it is actually outside Earth's orbit and no one has been to the Moon"
== Oh, really? So, those are the only two options? There isn't the third option: you don't fucking know what you're talking about? Hey, asshole, if you believe every physicist on Earth is wrong about physics, and doesn't understand basic entry-level thermodynamics... and you believe you know more about the Van Allen belts than James Van Allen... what are you wasting your time on RUclips for? Write up your calculations, and submit them for scientific peer review. If you're right, you'll have rewritten everything known about thermodynamics and about cosmic radiation. Your Nobel Prize is in the mail.
YOU SAID: "and no satellites have been to any other places in outer space because they too we're supposedly made from materials that melt below 3000 degrees Fahrenheit.."
== You think a few hot atoms will melt the gajillion zillion trillion billion atoms of a satellite??? You're an idiot.
YOU SAID: "although everyone agrees that 3 men died trying to get their. Cooked like 3 hampsters in a microwave..."
== ENGLISH, you idiot. I cannot understand this broken gibberish.
YOU SAID: "Also Thrust does work in a closed vaccum space"
== Oh, so now, Newton's 3rd law of motion no longer functions, huh? Yup, Nobel Prize, coming your way.
YOU SAID: "but is useless in a no contained open vaccum space .. things you might want to study up before calling others children or any other names.. "
== 10 years at 3 universities, top of every physics class I ever took... is that enough studying for you, dumbass?
YOU SAID: "personally though I laugh at such tactics to demean others in this way."
== You are demeaning yourself, dumbass.
YOU SAID: "I study things from all directions the pros and the cons"
== There should be a law against you using the word "study." I don't think you know what it means.
YOU SAID: "The psuedo and real science."
== Oh, the irony. You have determined that the laws of thermodynamics are wrong, the laws of motion are wrong, and you have zero understanding of radiation. Yet, you think you can identify "pseudo" and "real" science???
YOU SAID: "the applied mathematics and the observable Truth and"
== You're a moron.
YOU SAID: "The stitched together "Footage" presented in a film as real in a timeline sequence that reuses the same snippets of film in different places of the documentary promoted as real untouched filn footage."
== Bull. Fucking. Shit. This is very common in documentaries. If you want the footage in its original form, go watch that. Documentaries are subject to editing.
When I first read your statements, yeah, I thought it was pretty ridiculous that somebody would jump on your case for merely stating facts (100% correct facts). But, alas, you've proven yourself to be about as dumb as a person can be. Hey, fucking genius, next time you want to defy the core of known physics in a single RUclips message, just write it all up for scientific peer review instead. You'll either be laughed out the door, or you'll win a couple of Nobel Prizes. Guess where my money is going?