King Charles the third, with a speech sounds more like the antichrist on about peace, peace, for When he was a piece and safely, and then sudden destruction, comets Upon them as travail upon woman with child and shall not escape
If Nero is the beast, high priest is the false prophet, then what about the other prophecies regarding them? Not being able to buy and sell until they get the mark? Stopping the sacrifice, but before that making a covenant? Having a fatal wound? Authority for 42 months? High priest performing great signs and wonders? Second beast giving life to the image of the first beast? Won't they have to fulfill all these prophecies as well?
Index Clone, thank you for your questions. We, the modern readers of The Book of Revelation have been so conditioned to think that the book was written TO us that we overlook its immediate context beginning with understanding that it was written to 7 churches in Asia Minor (modern Turkiye) in AD 65. Secondly, we need to understand the literature used in the Book of Revelation. For example, 80% of its language is grounded in the Old Testament - especially the Prophets namely Daniel and Zechariah. With some overlap of course, 40% is grounded in the language of the Pentateuch particularly the language associated with the tabernacle and its furnishings. Thus, Daniel has already defined for the reader what the apocalyptic term 'beast' means - a ruler who represents an empire, people, or kingdom. In this sense, 'beast' is a metonym for what is represented. This is why Daniel describes both the ruler and empire as 'a beast'. Hence, most biblical scholars recognise that the beast prophesied in Daniel 7:7 was referring to the rise of the Roman Empire who its Caesars would represent and thus metonymically also be referred to as a 'beast'. (Dan. 7:3) And four great beasts came up out of the sea, different from one another. (Dan. 7:5) And behold, another beast, a second one, like a bear. It was raised up on one side. It had three ribs in its mouth between its teeth; and it was told, ‘Arise, devour much flesh.’ (Dan. 7:6) After this I looked, and behold, another, like a leopard, with four wings of a bird on its back. And the beast had four heads, and dominion was given to it. (Dan. 7:7) After this I saw in the night visions, and behold, a fourth beast, terrifying and dreadful and exceedingly strong. It had great iron teeth; it devoured and broke in pieces and stamped what was left with its feet. It was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns. In Revelation 13, there are two beasts referred to. The first is 'the beast from across the sea' which was Hebraism meaning that this ruler was not from "the Land" (Israel). The second beast referred to is 'of the earth' which is the Greek words 'tēs ge' (τῆς γῆς) which means "the Land". Therefore, note how you need to adjust your questions: The first ruler was the ruling emperor representing the ruling empire of AD 65 - Caesar Nero. But it is the SECOND beast who calls all people to worship the FIRST beast - which is exactly what happened at the sentencing of the Lord Jesus - (John 19:15) They cried out, “Away with him, away with him, crucify him!” Pilate said to them, “Shall I crucify your King?” The chief priests answered, “We have no king but Caesar.” And it the SECOND beast who causes people to receive 'a mark' of allegiance to the FIRST beast on their right hand or between the frontlet of their eyes ("on their forehead" Rev. 13:16-17). This is what the phylacteries were which were also condemned by Christ in Matthew 23:5, "They do all their deeds to be seen by others. For they make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long." Phylacteries were leather pouches tied around the right wrist or around the forehead that had to be worn into the Temple precinct so that you buy or sell your sacrifices for the Temple ceremonies. "The mortal wound was healed" (Rev. 13:12) prophetically pointed to the events that were to happen when Caesar Nero was invited to execute himself in AD 68. In AD 69 it looked like the Roman Empire might well collapse ("die") and is referred to by historians as "The Year of the Four Caesars" which should give you an indication of the strife that nearly ended the Empire. But it did recover when General Vespasian, assisted by son Titus, took control of the Empire. It was Caesar Vespasian and his Co-Caesar son Titus who destroyed Jerusalem and its Temple in AD 70. I hope this helps to answer your questions. - Dr. Andrew Corbett, Global University Graduate School of Theology.
@@DrAndrewC I was reading through your answers here and to be honest, there are some things that I would agree with, for example, the language that is taken from the Old Testament. But at the same time many of your answers don't adequately address what Revelation is actually saying. For example, you're talking about the idea that the Jewish leadership said that they have no king but Caesar. It's obvious from the New Testament Scriptures that this was said only in order to get Jesus crucified at the moment, against the wishes of Pilate. The book of Revelation on the other hand, speaks of these events in the future tense. As you know there is a big debate as to when this book was penned. But even if the 65 AD date was correct, this was decades after the crucifixion event. Yet you're trying to say that the second beast was trying to get people to worship the first beast at that time. But in the 60s AD there was a rebellion brewing in Judea against the Roman rule. So it's exactly the opposite of what you're saying.
@@TruckTruck-gu9vs I encourage you to watch my chapter-by-chapter explanation of the Book of Revelation on RUclips. Also check out my articles at www.andrewcorbett.net explaining the Book of Revelation.
@@DrAndrewC thank you for your invitation, but I just pointed out to you one simple issue that put a hole in the narrative that you're putting forth. I understand you have a book to sell, but I have to be very careful as a believer to examine the Scripture thoroughly to follow them. We all have that responsibility, especially those professing to be teachers among us. Kindly, I would recommend taking a step back and looking closely at what you are teaching in light of the Scriptures. Because it sure appears, by the look of it, that some tough times are ahead in the very near future for this world and its inhabitants.
@@TruckTruck-gu9vs Actually, I'm not sure if you read reply rebutting your "hole in the narrative" idea. I'm not asking you to buy anything. You can view my explanations on the Book of Revelation for free, and you can follow the daily Bible readings through the Book of Revelation on RUclips for free, and you can read answers to your questions on hundreds of articles that are free on my website.
He just appointed himself defender of all faiths. His name is 666 and he's a decenceded from David, and George the great. His coat of arms matches the beast in rev13. He was born in the year the state of Israel was created. There's tons more. I'm pretty sure it's him. Wales was the last and only remaining romon colony in Britain where Charles has emerged from, he's the 8th Charles in his line if you look right back.... He's here with us now, and he just created a new relationship with Israel, which just had it's 3.5 years of peace in the trump agreements. There will be many antichrist but only one "the antichrist" as Daniel said. The antichrist is indeed Charles IMO. Just one more thing because I could go on a while... The symbolism on his coat of arms, at the bottom it says in German "I serve" and just above the crown and..... The red dragon. Symbolism showing he gets his authority from the red dragon.
@@TTRJoyrider does the bible claim he should b born the year israel came back? i saw a video of him walking w muslims in muslim garb and supposedly muslims consider him muslim and the anti-christ is supposed to make a false, temporary peace between israel and her enemies.
@Michael Parsons wont the ac will cause 2/3 of israelis to b killed. trump is pro israel and obliterated isis while charles pals around w israels enemies. idk much about him but doesnt he act like hes on everybodys side like the ac will do? tim cohen seems to have it all figured out since the 80's. also i would think he will have to b all for the nwo.
As it is written dearly beloveds around the world, Let's fix our eyes on the Alpha and Omega and the Author and finisher of our faith JESUS CHRIST. Keep safe for we are Sojourners in this world. Continue our Great commission dearly beloveds 1.Tell the world that the KINGDOM of Heaven is at hand 2.Heal the sick and cleanse Corona viruses or Leprosy and cast out the demons in the mighty name of JESUS CHRIST around the world. Ephesians chapter 6. 🕊️🙏🙌🌱⛰️🌿💪
If the events in Revelation happened already, we would see Jesus right now and New Jerusalem from all ends of the earth. Doesn't take a biblical scholar to see that... You're now on the "Do not Recommend" list.
Unless of course we exegete the text of Revelation and recognise that there was a consistent imminence in the first 19 chapters and then a dramatic change in timeframe relevance from from chapter 20. We cannot read it by assuming that everything in it is about “our” future without realising rather that most of it was being about the future of original audience of AD 65.
@@DrAndrewC The Bible is consistent. Even in Daniel 8 it says that its an endtime revelation. All of it is connected. Even then, you can literally see a global government being formed before our very eyes. Its starting with the UN and Workd Economic Forum. Pay attention to the things Davos is do doing. The antichrist has not come yet but he will be here soon.
@@Cmdr_DarkNite Be careful brother about ignoring the historical context in which these prophecies were given and were decreed to be fulfilled; and take care in introducing concepts that are not in the text itself - such as, "antichrist" - when, it is only used in the Epistles of John, NOT in the Book of Revelation. You might benefit from doing a little bit research about Cerinthus the Gnostic and his attempted influence in and around the churches near Ephesus (that is, the seven churches of Asia Minor listed in Revelation 1-3) around AD65, and what he was teaching. Although John confronts his false teaching in his Epistles, it would be wrong to conflate him with another character mentioned in Revelation as 'the beast from across the sea'.
@@DrAndrewC you hold the preterist view don’t you? Have you ever heard of Luis del Alcazar, or ever read his book, Vestigio Armani Sensus Apocalysi/ or Investigation of the Hidden Sense of the Apocalypse? Alcazar was a Jesuit Gnostic, and wrote his book to be used as part of the counter reformation.
@@DrAndrewC Looking at cultural context is important but you have not answered the question that was posed. If you are correct how do you explain the discrepancy of the world continuing in wickedness and vile corruption today if Christ has completed His mission and is now ruling the New Earth?
Wow...he started off well, with "no Bill Gates is not the Antichrist!",and basically went off track soon after that. Daniel does indeed give a vision of the future kingdoms of the earth that directly impact the chosen people in Daniel chapters 2 & 7. What I can't understand is how the presenter goes through the 4 kingdoms correctly, yet somehow ends up at the feet of clay and iron which somehow equals Rome and Jerusalem??? Jerusalem was/is world power? Lol He totally omits the fact that the 4th beast is never conquered like the previous 3 (see Daniel 2:41, 7:8). Rome was never conquered but disintegrated into 10 divisions. That would be the feet that were made of clay and iron that couldn't join together even though it was tried through marriage, conquest, etc. Daniel 7:24 shows that the 10 horns are 10 kings (10 divisions of Rome) "and another would rise after them and would be more diverse from the first and would subdue 3 kings!" Here's a history lesson: in 493 the Heruli were destroyed, in 534 the Vandals were vanquished, and in 538. All 3 kingdoms were supporters of Arianism which was a formidable rival of Catholicism. Daniel 7:25 "And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time!". Revelations 13:5-7 parallels this but calls the timeframe 42 months. Revelations 11:3 call it a thousand, threescore and sixty days. If you read Numbers 14:34 and Ezekiel 4:6 it gives you the timeline of a day for a year in prophecy. There is only one power that fits the description of wearing out the saints or who they were given unto for the period of time mentioned above. Who subdued 3 kingdoms, sought to change times and laws, has the number of a "man" not men of 666 and yes is Anti... Anti can indeed mean "against" but can also mean "in place of!". So on that note seeks prayer. All the great reformers (Martin Luther, Tyndale, Wycliffe, etc) came to this conclusion. That beast power would be the Catholic church. The official title of the Pope is Vicarius Filii Dei which in Roman numerals adds up to 666. The Catholic churches reign lasted from 538ad to 1798ad when (1260 years, a time, times and the dividing of time or 42 months) Napoleon's general Berthier took the Pope prisoner resulting in the "Deadly Wound" of Revelations 13:3. In 1929 Mussolini executed the "Concordat of 1929" with the Papacy, restoring to them their properties and power. The deadly wound was healed. Today the Pope sits with president's, has the Senate and Congress hold sessions to hear him speak and we currently have 6 Catholics sitting on the bench of the highest court in the land .. The Supreme Court. She's not just healed she's flourishing
What a lovely response! Absolutely he doesn't. The errors are so numerous, I wouldn't know where to start!! May the Lord keep you in His Truth, and watching for the Resurrection of the saints, so you escape the judgments to come in the Day of the Lord to come!!
Jared kushner is strikingly close to the biblical prophetic signs of antichrist.. literally everything is pointing to him. God bless you all because one thing I am 100per cent about is that we are in the last days, and i mean we are right about to go in to the tribulations ❤ Jesus is king ❤
Yes Nero was one, so was pope sixtus III, among others. We're looking for a Nimrod type character, and EVERY-one should be looking much closer at that new 'king.'
@@DrAndrewC Until and unless you can show how evil will be wrapped up and righteousness made to rule on earth, you are the one with the poor hermeneutics.
You mean to tell me we are living in the time of Rev. Chapter 20, well all I can say satan must have a long chain, he doesn't seem too restricted to me with all the evil going on !
You greatly underestimate the capacity for evil within every human heart. Jeremiah 17:9 ¶ The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it?
No the gates of hell will not prevail if you remain in me and I remain in you I am the vine apart from me. You can do NOTHING cut of from me you perish
When He came to bring to an end the Old Covenant that He had made "obsolete" at the cross (Heb. 8:13) by fulfilling the point of His prophetic parable in Matthew 21:33-46, and when He said in Matthew 24:34 the time-frame when it would happen.
We do know. There are 2 different A.I right now. One is artificial and the other is part organic. Look up SOPHIA, who is being judged before our creator
Whether prophets likr Tim Cohen or Monty Judah is within the context of the scriptures. I recalled reading the passages from the Books of Moses. God reveals his secrets to the Jews, his chosen people, only. The scriptures written , " God is the revealer of hidden secret but the revealation of secrets reserved to my people, Jews, for ever." In other words, the gift of revealing secrets were given to God's chosen people as a previleged task or vocation for ever. It is no wander people often said, true Prophets came from the Jews." I think Cohen is the Levi priestly tribe and Monty Judah is a Messianic Jews. Both of these men have added credentials as the " true prophet of Jews." So their prophetic words have significant weight to their interpretations. I hope my contribution to this post help the readers because English is not my first language and I am a Gentile.
Most scholars identify Antiochus Epiphanies as an Antichrist figure, who was and is to come. He persecuted the Jews, desecrated the temple with an image of Zeus and sacrificed a pig on the altar committing the abomination of desolation.
Yes he definitely did. However, Matthew 24 speaks of another that will do the same. Except it will be a tribulation that the world has never seen and will never see again. Matthew 24 quotes the passage from Daniel regarding the abomination of desolation.
You are on to something here. Antiochus was a Seleucid King. The Seleucids were Asian Greeks who went to Asia with Alexander the Great. I see the AC as someone from the Eastern Roman Empire. The Romans who destroyed the Second Temple in 70 AD recruited soldiers from whence they were stationed. The commanders were from Italy like Vaspasian but the soldiers were Syrians, Arabians, Hittites et. al.
What about the lamb with seven eyes and “he who is to come”? Isn’t God is supposed to with his people at the end of time? What about Jesus letter to the angel of Philadelphia? What about the rainbow angel?
In order to believe this type of doctrine you have to disregard so much of what is actually written. So when did the third of the earth die? Cause that is in Revelation 8 and you say we are now in Revelation 20. Please people go read your Bible for yourself and pray that the Holy Spirit reveals the truth to you. Cause this is extremely miss leading
Jon, thank you for your question. I can assure you that the worldview of the AD 65 audience was not the same as the 'global' perspective that we have today. I will forgive your rudeness about my need to become familiar with the Bible, and simply point you to the my daily Bible readings with commentary through the entire Bible ruclips.net/video/oGmSwtotNpM/видео.html&pp=gAQBiAQB -and, then point out that the Bible uses "perspective language" rather than "21st century Western language". For example, in the Old Testament (which is the language that informs the literature of The Book of Revelation), the use of the term of "earth" is clearly stated from the perspective of the writer - 1Sam. 4:5 ¶ As soon as the ark of the covenant of the LORD came into the camp, all Israel gave a mighty shout, so that the earth resounded. 1Sam. 14:15 And there was a panic in the camp, in the field, and among all the people. The garrison and even the raiders trembled, the earth quaked, and it became a very great panic. 1Kings 10:24 And the whole earth sought the presence of Solomon to hear his wisdom, which God had put into his mind. In Revelation 8, it is the same Old Testament language usage that informs Revelation's use of words. The focus loci is the land of Israel - which you can see from the above OT references was frequently referred to as the "whole earth". During the siege of Jerusalem and the surrounding Roman military actions around Judea, it is estimated that over 2million Jews died over the seven years it lasted, until Emperor Vespasian's son, Titus, finally conquered the wall city of Jerusalem and destroyed the temple, thus fulfilling Christ's prophecies in Matthew 24.
You are completely wrong. You are Talking about the history. Revelation is about the End times, in the future. The Beast, The Anti Christ, The Prostitute of Babylon, The Great Tribulation all have to come in a near future
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost!.!
Revelation 13:18 states that "Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six.” I can read the Arabic, in that number lies where he comes from, Arabia. The Codex Vaticnous left it Greek, but its clear what John saw and wrote, “Bismillah.”
The third temple has been tried to be rebuilt about half a dozen times. Check out the rebuilding of the third temple at the time of Roman Emperor Julian the Apostate in the 4th century and the 7th century when the Jews under the Sassanid Empire tried. I have my doubts.
@juanisaac5172 I am aware of all that. Isreal still has been working on building this temple again. They even have some sections already built that will be lowered in place when the ground has been made ready. There was some issues on where they were going to put it, since they originally thought it was supposed to go where the Dome of the Rock currently is. However they recently unearthed the location of the original temple, so when excavation is complete, they will put it there. They have the red header without blemish, and they found the old formula for the oil. So the temple will be built. It's simply a matter of time.
@@dustyschwartz1576 Dusty, one of the principles of biblical hermeneutics is to begin by answering the questions: (i) What was the occasion for this biblical work? Supplementary to this then is, (ii) When was this written? (This has a direct bearing particularly on how we understand prophetic passages and apocalyptic literature.) (iii) Who was the audience? (None of the Biblical literature was written "to" us. Rather, while its original audience shapes the way we must interpret it, we know that all of Scripture has been divinely inspired "for" us.) (iv) How then did that original, and immediately subsequent, audience understand what was written to them? By answering these questions we can begin to avoid the modern problem of eisegesis (reading into the text of Scripture, rather than exegeting - drawing out from - Scripture. * For your consideration: The term "antichrist" does not appear in the Gospels, Paul's epistles, Peter's Epistles. Hebrews, James or Jude, or the Book of Revelation. It is a dangerous eisegetical conflation to other New Testament terms with this very particular Johanine term that only occurs in his epistles and had immediately cultural relevance to the gnostic heresy being peddled in Ephesus at the time John wrote his epistles to them. * The term "second coming of Christ" does not occur in the Gospels. This is particularly important to note regarding the Olivet Discourse of Matthew 24 and Luke 21 where many Bible teachers eisegetically assume it into the text. * The Greek word "parousia" translated into English as "appear" or "come" does not mean "return" but more likely means "come in judgment" which is demanded by the context of it in the Olivet Discourse. * The Greek word translated "world" in Matthew 24:14 , is not "cosmos" (entire world) but "oichoumene" (the Mediterranean/Roman world, also used in Lk. 2:1 - "In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world (Gr. oichoumene) should be registered." Dusty, each of these points that I have listed are non-controversial and considered mainstream classic theology. By considering these issues it should become apparent to those who know and love Jesus and His Word, that much of the speculative nonsense that has been promoted by so-called Bible-prophecy teachers is a false reading and interpretation of Scripture. I have much more to say about this and have many more articles about eschatology on my website- www.andrewcorbett.net .
The third temple of God is all us believers. We are where The Lord dwells. There will not ever be a brick and mortar temple again. That would undo the work of Christ on the cross and his resurrection.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost!.!
These people don't know. If they did they would just go to him and point him out. Commen sense. All this is speculations. Nothing factual. Facts is when you can say his name and show us what he looks like.
I think the beast across the sea what the speaker referring to in the Revelation is none other the nation that is between Asia and Europe. That nation lies between the two seas. When its going to invade any nations in Europe or Asia, it forces have to cross the sea.
PART FOUR OBEDIENCE TO GOD Throughout history allegiance to God has always been evidenced by one thing and that is obedience. Through our obedience to God and to his ten commandments, for they are a mark between God and his people. For anyone claiming to know God that doesn't keep his ten commandments is deceived and living a lie. For the truth is not in him. But whosoever keeps his word and follows his commandments truly the love of God is perfected in him. Our actions and decisions reveal to God and to the universe who we truly belong to So keeping Gods instruction and his commandments is really that important and it means that much to him and our salvation. Although the truth sometimes hurts it needs to be told. As it's better to be hurt by the truth than it is to be comforted by a lie AN ISSUE OF WORSHIP AND OBEDIENCE So the mark of the beast will be a direct counterfeit of Gods mark with humanity The final test for mankind will be an issue of obedience and who will be served. It will involve Gods timing ALTERING GODS TIMES But what about attempting to alter Gods times as mentioned in Daniel 7 : 25 Has the Papacy attempted to alter and change Gods times in any way The answer to that is yes Pursuant to official catechisms the Catholic Church has also altered the timing of the fourth commandment that discusses the Sabbath and changed the Sabbath day to Sunday. In their official writings The Converts Catechism Of The Catholic Doctrine. The Papacy states : Which is the Sabbath Day in answer to that God's Sabbath was commenced on Friday at sundown and carried through all of Saturday ending at Saturday sundown Just as it still occurs within Judaism and is adhered to by practising Jews as was always done and still is throughout time. So why therefore do we in the Catholic Church observe Sunday Sabbath instead of Saturday Sabbath. We do so because the Catholic Church in the Council of Laodicea in 336 AD transferred the solemnity from the original Sabbath time and altered it to Sunday. The Catholic Church in doing this boldly claims to have the power to change Gods Holy Law Truthfully had the Roman Catholic Church not had such overwhelming power she could not have substituted the observance of the original Sabbath day to Sunday By transferring Gods Sabbath to Sunday for which there is no scriptural authority to do so. Sadly though this practice commenced by Rome is now entrenched and continued within so many other Church denominations. Including by many Protestant Church denominations all of whom came away from Rome because of her apostasy. But continued their practice of Sunday worship a practice that was initiated by Pagan Rome. ALTERING GODS LAWS The Papacy has not only altered Gods Times, but also His Laws, The Sabbath and God's own Commandments. Along with altering his holy scripture as the Catholics who have their own version of the bible that is different to all other bibles. There are just so many snares and pitfalls of which to be wary designed to catch us all unaware and lead us astray We also need to be aware that Yahweh the Holy name of God Almighty was removed from many of the early bibles in their translation and replaced by the word Lord. Evidenced in that those who translated the scrolls were not inspired by God as the Hebrew word Baal translates into English as Lord so all who convey Lord God may actually be saying Baal God. Aware that Baal is Satan who wants equality with God let us therefore not fall into this deception Whereas God's ten commandments law is sacrosanct and cannot be changed or altered. Yes it really is that serious However the Papacy of Rome has done just that by removing one commandment entirely and splitting another into two in order to make ten commandments along with altering another entirely. The Catholic Church removed the second of Gods commandments which forbids the worship of idols and graven images and they split the tenth commandment into two in order to make ten commandments They also altered the fourth commandment
Caiaphas is the type of the false priest. The fatal head wound was healed in 1948. When Christ was crucified, the Jews swore allegiance to Caesar as their KING. Judah becomes the Gentile beast or the head of the 7 headed beast.
That's what we've been taught but do the scriptures actually say he would be, ‘Charismatic,’ and ‘loved by all?’ As far as women it could be Camilla is really a man, that would explain why she’s always looked horrid as a ‘woman.’ Watch Tim Cohens videos about King Charels lll on RUclips. He also has a book called the Antichrist and a cup of tea. You'll have no doubts the Antichrist is King Charles lll. If you listen. The proof is undeniable.
Yuval Noah Harari is Anti-Christ esque but He Is NOT the Anti-Christ,….well not yet in any case. The Person known as the AC has a fierce Countenance,….Yuval is gentle LOOKING! But if he is to nearly die perhaps via an assassin, then he could become fierce looking because of a mutation of that assassination attempt! But yes,…I’m not including thorough scripture references & study to capture that conclusion. But it is accurate to say that the AC does have a coming back to life event.
Anyone telling you who the antichrist is, is sadly mistaken. The bible says .. let me say it again... The bible says we will not know who he is till he stands in the temple mount. Now there might be people to watch out for. Ppl to narrow it down to but in no way a precise who until he stands in the temple.
Yeah it’s Rome because western Christianity doesn’t know history. Forget all about the other empire that ruled the area for about 1100 years. Ignore it!
Revelations 22:10 " seal this letter you sent to 7 churchses, its not for them. Its for americans eating oreos and doritoes in their living room 2000 years from now."
@@conniedavis9325 What is the Head wound for William ? Seems King Charles is still the Front runner candidate. We haven't long before a rapid leap into the Heavy Parts of Revelation are Thrust on to the World. King Charles will be same age as Moses (80 years old) when peak freaky events are unfolding.
@@conniedavis9325william has a different coat of arms. Yes he had a head injury but it was not fatal and world did not begin to follow him like the Bible says it will when antichrist counterfeits a resurrection
Plainly put, but to the point. I think, he's right- but also, I gotta wonder about the Prophecies, that have more than one, fulfillment. Passover, King Solomon/Shalomon, Yosesph.Joseph, Yahoshua.Joshua- Son of Nun, etc.
Your wrong and basically you saying the majority of Scholars who have written books and studied revelation that have agreed about the ain’t Christ who is yet to come are wrong. Also the Jews have had plans to be rebuild the temple for some time, And it will happen.
The Book of Revelation never mentions the word ‘Antichrist’. John wrote The Revelation in AD65 in which he told his audience in Revelation 13:18 “with wisdom you can calculate the number of the beast for it is the number of a man”. This means that the first beast of Revelation 13 was alive and known at the time John wrote to them. There are many scholars who acknowledge this which you may not be aware of.
Video is sitting on 666 comments! So, this is comment 667. Quite interesting hypothesis ... and I half agree ... though I also wonder about Trump as Antichrist! Hmmm
@@andrewhough8479 I distinguish the two beasts exegetically. The term "antichrist" which is only found in John's epistles, seems to be a reference of the proto-gnostic false teacher Cerinthus who was disturbing the believers of Asia Minor to whom John's epistles are addressed. The apostle Paul makes reference to the man of lawlessness who takes his seat in the Temple of God which could only be a reference to the High Priest, which I believe is the first of the two beasts depicted in Revelation 13.
The whole jesus story is actually lanti God. This plastic roman made-up jesus story wirked so well for them to the present. There only one supreme to dethroned, and that is the only one Creator whose name is not even known. But the fact is, as Nimrod sat himself up to build a tower to get to heaven, enter therein and kill God, ever since evil men and women are engaged in doing the same thing. As there is no posibility of this happening then the next step is to kill God from the minds of humans, fake demi gods are brought in, fake gospels, fake saviors, fake comings and ends of the world. It's actually not hard to figure this up..peace!
No,….because He also told them that the temple will be brought to nothing! Crushed, Finished. So is Jesus saying two things at once,….double talk!? No! He is talking about a future event.
Who is the Antichrist? He will arise from the Revised Roman Empire Daniel 9:26 “After the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be put to death and will have nothing.[g] The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.” This is perhaps the clearest verse as to the area of the world the Antichrist will arise from. This verse is from the powerful prophetic insight that Daniel had as God revealed to him Israel’s future. God showed him that there would be seventy weeks of years. My purpose is not to provide an explanation of that but to show that as God revealed to Daniel Israel’s future, that He also revealed the part of the world the Antichrist comes from. Daniel 9:26 reveals to us that the Anointed one will be put to death. The Anointed One is Jesus! When he died on the cross He fulfilled this prophecy. Also predicted was that the “people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.” This happened in 70 A.D. when the Romans conquered Jerusalem, and destroyed the city of Jerusalem and the sanctuary (the temple). The phrase used is interesting. It doesn’t say the ruler and his people did this, but rather, “people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.” The ruler who will come refers to the Antichrist and also reveals his identity. He will come from what used to be the Roman Empire
The glaring issue with this is that the beast and the false prophet are destroyed by Christ at his coming. Are you claiming that Christ has already come a second time?
Thank you for the question Eric. If you are asking if I believe that Christ has returned and judged all - the living and the dead, no I do not. But if you are asking me I believe that the Scripture teaches that Christ would come in judgment to end the Old Covenant, yes I do. andrewcorbett.net/
@@DrAndrewC I just wonder how you deal with the verses throughout the New Testament that say Christ will come with the voice of the archangel and at the last trumpet and the dead will rise, and we who are alive and remain will be changed and we will be gathered to meet the Lord in the air. At that last trumpet is when Christ destroys the beast and the false prophet. The scriptures are clear on that. How can the antichrist be a historical figure if that prophecy hasn’t happened yet. I believe there were antichrists in the past, but there will be a future one as well that fulfill the prophecies. There has never been a mark of the beast either. It’s pretty clear. I believe the scripture is clear that the resurrection is after the great tribulation, but even pre trib and mid trib believers are almost all in agreement that these prophecies have not been fulfilled yet.
@@DrAndrewC also I do not believe God ends his covenants. There aren’t two, but many: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, Christ, … They don’t go away. They build on the former.
@@EricTheBranch Hebrews 8:13 - "¶ In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away."
My friend,..., in Matthew 24, Mark 13, Christ points to Daniel and put his prophesy past all in our time, the parable of the fig tree is from 1948, the ac will be the last king out of the four generals Daniel 8 : 9 and a clear picture of him in verses 23 - 25. It is the one his " policy " that influence the world today, he will no be revealed now, restrianer Daniel 10 :21.( on rapture please) Matthew 24 : 29 - 31. King Charles 111 , fits prophesy best.
Not saying you are referring to me and my sons in the Revived Roman Empire, but we never went to Israel. Neither have my sons. I also already calculated our Gematria - Passed! Praise God! Not Prostitutes and we also are not High Priests. 5-9-2023.
The antichrist is identified in the second chapter of First John. It clearly identifies the antichrist as a group of people who left the congregation, who denied that Jesus came in the flesh, and who were teaching this doctrine, along with other false teaching, which is addressed and refuted in First John. The Beast was Caesar, who claimed to be God and demanded that people worship him as God, along with the gods of Rome. See, Revelation, which addresses the Great Persecution.
No I don't want to know 2 Thessalonians chapters 1. 2 say he has to be revealed it's a mystery we don't know. I will say this it's nothing to do with the royal family .stop speculating and get on with the preaching of the gospel.
Dont worry about the anti christ and who he might be , know Jesus Christ and follow Him , He is the only "Christ" thats important . Read John chapter 3 , dont waste your time watching this garbage .
@@adrianojames7903 Then don't you think it odd, quite odd, that you are disagreeing the very point I have made in this video which you also made in your original comment?
@@DrAndrewC Not really . All that means is your title is click bait , but I am glad to hear that was your point , but why not have a title that reflects your true intention ?
@@adrianojames7903 No it isn't - it is exactly the precise title for determining who the antichrist was, and therefore why we should not be distracted by those who speculate their nonsense which diverts believers away from their focus on glorifying the Christ.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost!.!
King Charles the third, with a speech sounds more like the antichrist on about peace, peace, for When he was a piece and safely, and then sudden destruction, comets Upon them as travail upon woman with child and shall not escape
William.
x
@@CHRISTIAN-CONCAVERSyeah
If Nero is the beast, high priest is the false prophet, then what about the other prophecies regarding them? Not being able to buy and sell until they get the mark? Stopping the sacrifice, but before that making a covenant? Having a fatal wound? Authority for 42 months? High priest performing great signs and wonders? Second beast giving life to the image of the first beast? Won't they have to fulfill all these prophecies as well?
Index Clone, thank you for your questions. We, the modern readers of The Book of Revelation have been so conditioned to think that the book was written TO us that we overlook its immediate context beginning with understanding that it was written to 7 churches in Asia Minor (modern Turkiye) in AD 65. Secondly, we need to understand the literature used in the Book of Revelation. For example, 80% of its language is grounded in the Old Testament - especially the Prophets namely Daniel and Zechariah. With some overlap of course, 40% is grounded in the language of the Pentateuch particularly the language associated with the tabernacle and its furnishings. Thus, Daniel has already defined for the reader what the apocalyptic term 'beast' means - a ruler who represents an empire, people, or kingdom. In this sense, 'beast' is a metonym for what is represented. This is why Daniel describes both the ruler and empire as 'a beast'. Hence, most biblical scholars recognise that the beast prophesied in Daniel 7:7 was referring to the rise of the Roman Empire who its Caesars would represent and thus metonymically also be referred to as a 'beast'.
(Dan. 7:3) And four great beasts came up out of the sea, different from one another.
(Dan. 7:5) And behold, another beast, a second one, like a bear. It was raised up on one side. It had three ribs in its mouth between its teeth; and it was told, ‘Arise, devour much flesh.’
(Dan. 7:6) After this I looked, and behold, another, like a leopard, with four wings of a bird on its back. And the beast had four heads, and dominion was given to it.
(Dan. 7:7) After this I saw in the night visions, and behold, a fourth beast, terrifying and dreadful and exceedingly strong. It had great iron teeth; it devoured and broke in pieces and stamped what was left with its feet. It was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns.
In Revelation 13, there are two beasts referred to. The first is 'the beast from across the sea' which was Hebraism meaning that this ruler was not from "the Land" (Israel). The second beast referred to is 'of the earth' which is the Greek words 'tēs ge' (τῆς γῆς) which means "the Land". Therefore, note how you need to adjust your questions: The first ruler was the ruling emperor representing the ruling empire of AD 65 - Caesar Nero. But it is the SECOND beast who calls all people to worship the FIRST beast - which is exactly what happened at the sentencing of the Lord Jesus - (John 19:15) They cried out, “Away with him, away with him, crucify him!” Pilate said to them, “Shall I crucify your King?” The chief priests answered, “We have no king but Caesar.”
And it the SECOND beast who causes people to receive 'a mark' of allegiance to the FIRST beast on their right hand or between the frontlet of their eyes ("on their forehead" Rev. 13:16-17). This is what the phylacteries were which were also condemned by Christ in Matthew 23:5, "They do all their deeds to be seen by others. For they make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long." Phylacteries were leather pouches tied around the right wrist or around the forehead that had to be worn into the Temple precinct so that you buy or sell your sacrifices for the Temple ceremonies.
"The mortal wound was healed" (Rev. 13:12) prophetically pointed to the events that were to happen when Caesar Nero was invited to execute himself in AD 68. In AD 69 it looked like the Roman Empire might well collapse ("die") and is referred to by historians as "The Year of the Four Caesars" which should give you an indication of the strife that nearly ended the Empire. But it did recover when General Vespasian, assisted by son Titus, took control of the Empire. It was Caesar Vespasian and his Co-Caesar son Titus who destroyed Jerusalem and its Temple in AD 70.
I hope this helps to answer your questions.
- Dr. Andrew Corbett, Global University Graduate School of Theology.
@@DrAndrewC I was reading through your answers here and to be honest, there are some things that I would agree with, for example, the language that is taken from the Old Testament. But at the same time many of your answers don't adequately address what Revelation is actually saying. For example, you're talking about the idea that the Jewish leadership said that they have no king but Caesar. It's obvious from the New Testament Scriptures that this was said only in order to get Jesus crucified at the moment, against the wishes of Pilate. The book of Revelation on the other hand, speaks of these events in the future tense. As you know there is a big debate as to when this book was penned. But even if the 65 AD date was correct, this was decades after the crucifixion event. Yet you're trying to say that the second beast was trying to get people to worship the first beast at that time. But in the 60s AD there was a rebellion brewing in Judea against the Roman rule. So it's exactly the opposite of what you're saying.
@@TruckTruck-gu9vs I encourage you to watch my chapter-by-chapter explanation of the Book of Revelation on RUclips. Also check out my articles at www.andrewcorbett.net explaining the Book of Revelation.
@@DrAndrewC thank you for your invitation, but I just pointed out to you one simple issue that put a hole in the narrative that you're putting forth. I understand you have a book to sell, but I have to be very careful as a believer to examine the Scripture thoroughly to follow them. We all have that responsibility, especially those professing to be teachers among us. Kindly, I would recommend taking a step back and looking closely at what you are teaching in light of the Scriptures. Because it sure appears, by the look of it, that some tough times are ahead in the very near future for this world and its inhabitants.
@@TruckTruck-gu9vs Actually, I'm not sure if you read reply rebutting your "hole in the narrative" idea. I'm not asking you to buy anything. You can view my explanations on the Book of Revelation for free, and you can follow the daily Bible readings through the Book of Revelation on RUclips for free, and you can read answers to your questions on hundreds of articles that are free on my website.
It was a video in RUclips...a few year's ago calculating that Prince Harry's name .. resulting in 666..however that video disappeared
Actually king Charles 3
Harry is way too stupid to be the Antichrist.
what about king charles?
He just appointed himself defender of all faiths. His name is 666 and he's a decenceded from David, and George the great.
His coat of arms matches the beast in rev13.
He was born in the year the state of Israel was created. There's tons more. I'm pretty sure it's him.
Wales was the last and only remaining romon colony in Britain where Charles has emerged from, he's the 8th Charles in his line if you look right back....
He's here with us now, and he just created a new relationship with Israel, which just had it's 3.5 years of peace in the trump agreements.
There will be many antichrist but only one "the antichrist" as Daniel said. The antichrist is indeed Charles IMO.
Just one more thing because I could go on a while...
The symbolism on his coat of arms, at the bottom it says in German "I serve" and just above the crown and..... The red dragon.
Symbolism showing he gets his authority from the red dragon.
@@TTRJoyrider does the bible claim he should b born the year israel came back? i saw a video of him walking w muslims in muslim garb and supposedly muslims consider him muslim and the anti-christ is supposed to make a false, temporary peace between israel and her enemies.
@Michael Parsons wont the ac will cause 2/3 of israelis to b killed. trump is pro israel and obliterated isis while charles pals around w israels enemies. idk much about him but doesnt he act like hes on everybodys side like the ac will do? tim cohen seems to have it all figured out since the 80's. also i would think he will have to b all for the nwo.
@Michael Parsons i checked those chapters and i couldnt find anything about a "loud TRUMPet".
Is Communism considered lawlessness?
As it is written dearly beloveds around the world, Let's fix our eyes on the Alpha and Omega and the Author and finisher of our faith JESUS CHRIST.
Keep safe for we are Sojourners in this world.
Continue our Great commission dearly beloveds
1.Tell the world that the KINGDOM of Heaven is at hand
2.Heal the sick and cleanse Corona viruses or Leprosy and cast out the demons in the mighty name of JESUS CHRIST around the world. Ephesians chapter 6.
🕊️🙏🙌🌱⛰️🌿💪
Brother Paul's channel is also very good in compiling a checklist
Prince William?
Prince Harry.
@@acb5245 why prince harry
@@acb5245Harry is too dumb.
The holy spirit is with you.... it's
Prince William 100%... this is an apocalypse from God
@@aisthimatiasthivaexac
Keep God first and live your life. Enjoy this video🇺🇲
Tell me about it!
The checklist is found in 1 John 2 and also in 1 John 4.
If the events in Revelation happened already, we would see Jesus right now and New Jerusalem from all ends of the earth. Doesn't take a biblical scholar to see that... You're now on the "Do not Recommend" list.
Unless of course we exegete the text of Revelation and recognise that there was a consistent imminence in the first 19 chapters and then a dramatic change in timeframe relevance from from chapter 20. We cannot read it by assuming that everything in it is about “our” future without realising rather that most of it was being about the future of original audience of AD 65.
@@DrAndrewC
The Bible is consistent. Even in Daniel 8 it says that its an endtime revelation. All of it is connected.
Even then, you can literally see a global government being formed before our very eyes. Its starting with the UN and Workd Economic Forum. Pay attention to the things Davos is do doing. The antichrist has not come yet but he will be here soon.
@@Cmdr_DarkNite Be careful brother about ignoring the historical context in which these prophecies were given and were decreed to be fulfilled; and take care in introducing concepts that are not in the text itself - such as, "antichrist" - when, it is only used in the Epistles of John, NOT in the Book of Revelation. You might benefit from doing a little bit research about Cerinthus the Gnostic and his attempted influence in and around the churches near Ephesus (that is, the seven churches of Asia Minor listed in Revelation 1-3) around AD65, and what he was teaching. Although John confronts his false teaching in his Epistles, it would be wrong to conflate him with another character mentioned in Revelation as 'the beast from across the sea'.
@@DrAndrewC you hold the preterist view don’t you?
Have you ever heard of Luis del Alcazar, or ever read his book,
Vestigio Armani Sensus Apocalysi/ or Investigation of the Hidden Sense of the Apocalypse?
Alcazar was a Jesuit Gnostic, and wrote his book to be used as part of the counter reformation.
@@DrAndrewC Looking at cultural context is important but you have not answered the question that was posed.
If you are correct how do you explain the discrepancy of the world continuing in wickedness and vile corruption today if Christ has completed His mission and is now ruling the New Earth?
Wow...he started off well, with "no Bill Gates is not the Antichrist!",and basically went off track soon after that.
Daniel does indeed give a vision of the future kingdoms of the earth that directly impact the chosen people in Daniel chapters 2 & 7.
What I can't understand is how the presenter goes through the 4 kingdoms correctly, yet somehow ends up at the feet of clay and iron which somehow equals Rome and Jerusalem??? Jerusalem was/is world power? Lol
He totally omits the fact that the 4th beast is never conquered like the previous 3 (see Daniel 2:41, 7:8). Rome was never conquered but disintegrated into 10 divisions. That would be the feet that were made of clay and iron that couldn't join together even though it was tried through marriage, conquest, etc.
Daniel 7:24 shows that the 10 horns are 10 kings (10 divisions of Rome) "and another would rise after them and would be more diverse from the first and would subdue 3 kings!" Here's a history lesson: in 493 the Heruli were destroyed, in 534 the Vandals were vanquished, and in 538. All 3 kingdoms were supporters of Arianism which was a formidable rival of Catholicism.
Daniel 7:25 "And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time!". Revelations 13:5-7 parallels this but calls the timeframe 42 months. Revelations 11:3 call it a thousand, threescore and sixty days. If you read Numbers 14:34 and Ezekiel 4:6 it gives you the timeline of a day for a year in prophecy.
There is only one power that fits the description of wearing out the saints or who they were given unto for the period of time mentioned above. Who subdued 3 kingdoms, sought to change times and laws, has the number of a "man" not men of 666 and yes is Anti... Anti can indeed mean "against" but can also mean "in place of!". So on that note seeks prayer. All the great reformers (Martin Luther, Tyndale, Wycliffe, etc) came to this conclusion.
That beast power would be the Catholic church. The official title of the Pope is Vicarius Filii Dei which in Roman numerals adds up to 666. The Catholic churches reign lasted from 538ad to 1798ad when (1260 years, a time, times and the dividing of time or 42 months) Napoleon's general Berthier took the Pope prisoner resulting in the "Deadly Wound" of Revelations 13:3. In 1929 Mussolini executed the "Concordat of 1929" with the Papacy, restoring to them their properties and power. The deadly wound was healed.
Today the Pope sits with president's, has the Senate and Congress hold sessions to hear him speak and we currently have 6 Catholics sitting on the bench of the highest court in the land .. The Supreme Court. She's not just healed she's flourishing
Lord, forgive Mr. Corbett, for he knows not what he’s doing.
What a lovely response! Absolutely he doesn't. The errors are so numerous, I wouldn't know where to start!! May the Lord keep you in His Truth, and watching for the Resurrection of the saints, so you escape the judgments to come in the Day of the Lord to come!!
May the Lord bless you always because you know everything.
Just another theory. Possible, but we will see.
Jared kushner is strikingly close to the biblical prophetic signs of antichrist.. literally everything is pointing to him. God bless you all because one thing I am 100per cent about is that we are in the last days, and i mean we are right about to go in to the tribulations ❤ Jesus is king ❤
Yes Nero was one, so was pope sixtus III, among others.
We're looking for a Nimrod type character, and EVERY-one should be looking much closer at that new 'king.'
That’s not how sound Biblical exegesis works and inevitably leads to poor hermeneutics.
@@DrAndrewC Until and unless you can show how evil will be wrapped up and righteousness made to rule on earth, you are the one with the poor hermeneutics.
I think we should be watching Prince William
Why Sisxtus III? I have heard of Boniface III being a type of Anti-CHrist. But never Sixtus. Can you tell me why?
@@BlackAdder1970 Not just William but Henry aka Harry
You mean to tell me we are living in the time of Rev. Chapter 20, well all I can say satan must have a long chain, he doesn't seem too restricted to me with all the evil going on !
You greatly underestimate the capacity for evil within every human heart. Jeremiah 17:9 ¶ The heart is deceitful above all things,
and desperately sick;
who can understand it?
And we do live in the days of the utmost deception of all time, nothing is what it may seem
The Gates of hell shall not prevail!
No the gates of hell will not prevail if you remain in me and I remain in you I am the vine apart from me. You can do NOTHING cut of from me you perish
Could it be A.I.?
1-19 fulfilled? When did Jesus return on a white horse? When did the armies of heaven come down? When did he rule the nations with a rod of iron?
When He came to bring to an end the Old Covenant that He had made "obsolete" at the cross (Heb. 8:13) by fulfilling the point of His prophetic parable in Matthew 21:33-46, and when He said in Matthew 24:34 the time-frame when it would happen.
Every body claims someone different is the Antichrist
How do we know AI isn't running everything now? We're actually in the Matrix. We are DEFINITELY being decieved.
We do know. There are 2 different A.I right now. One is artificial and the other is part organic. Look up SOPHIA, who is being judged before our creator
Beware false prophets!!!
They come and gooooooo 🃏
Whether prophets likr Tim Cohen or Monty Judah is within the context of the scriptures. I recalled reading the passages from the Books of Moses. God reveals his secrets to the Jews, his chosen people, only. The scriptures written , " God is the revealer of hidden secret but the revealation of secrets reserved to my people, Jews, for ever." In other words, the gift of revealing secrets were given to God's chosen people as a previleged task or vocation for ever. It is no wander people often said, true Prophets came from the Jews." I think Cohen is the Levi priestly tribe and Monty Judah is a Messianic Jews. Both of these men have added credentials as the " true prophet of Jews." So their prophetic words have significant weight to their interpretations. I hope my contribution to this post help the readers because English is not my first language and I am a Gentile.
Jarred kushner
I wouldn't doubt it. Look at his face, it's evil.
Most scholars identify Antiochus Epiphanies as an Antichrist figure, who was and is to come. He persecuted the Jews, desecrated the temple with an image of Zeus and sacrificed a pig on the altar committing the abomination of desolation.
Yes he definitely did. However, Matthew 24 speaks of another that will do the same. Except it will be a tribulation that the world has never seen and will never see again. Matthew 24 quotes the passage from Daniel regarding the abomination of desolation.
It can't be a Greek.....
You are on to something here. Antiochus was a Seleucid King. The Seleucids were Asian Greeks who went to Asia with Alexander the Great. I see the AC as someone from the Eastern Roman Empire. The Romans who destroyed the Second Temple in 70 AD recruited soldiers from whence they were stationed. The commanders were from Italy like Vaspasian but the soldiers were Syrians, Arabians, Hittites et. al.
What about the lamb with seven eyes and “he who is to come”?
Isn’t God is supposed to with his people at the end of time? What about Jesus letter to the angel of Philadelphia? What about the rainbow angel?
In order to believe this type of doctrine you have to disregard so much of what is actually written. So when did the third of the earth die? Cause that is in Revelation 8 and you say we are now in Revelation 20. Please people go read your Bible for yourself and pray that the Holy Spirit reveals the truth to you. Cause this is extremely miss leading
Jon, thank you for your question. I can assure you that the worldview of the AD 65 audience was not the same as the 'global' perspective that we have today. I will forgive your rudeness about my need to become familiar with the Bible, and simply point you to the my daily Bible readings with commentary through the entire Bible ruclips.net/video/oGmSwtotNpM/видео.html&pp=gAQBiAQB -and, then point out that the Bible uses "perspective language" rather than "21st century Western language". For example, in the Old Testament (which is the language that informs the literature of The Book of Revelation), the use of the term of "earth" is clearly stated from the perspective of the writer -
1Sam. 4:5 ¶ As soon as the ark of the covenant of the LORD came into the camp, all Israel gave a mighty shout, so that the earth resounded.
1Sam. 14:15 And there was a panic in the camp, in the field, and among all the people. The garrison and even the raiders trembled, the earth quaked, and it became a very great panic.
1Kings 10:24 And the whole earth sought the presence of Solomon to hear his wisdom, which God had put into his mind.
In Revelation 8, it is the same Old Testament language usage that informs Revelation's use of words. The focus loci is the land of Israel - which you can see from the above OT references was frequently referred to as the "whole earth". During the siege of Jerusalem and the surrounding Roman military actions around Judea, it is estimated that over 2million Jews died over the seven years it lasted, until Emperor Vespasian's son, Titus, finally conquered the wall city of Jerusalem and destroyed the temple, thus fulfilling Christ's prophecies in Matthew 24.
What about seal up the book until the time of the end?
The "time of the end" does not refer to "the end of the world".
The teaching being offered here depends on WHEN John wrote Revelation.
where does the word rome show up in Daniel ? Even if your correct Daniel never says its rome
So are you saying the beast will attack the Messiah
I already know who he is. It’s King Charles. And nobody else whatsoever in the history of the world fits the description.
You are completely wrong. You are Talking about the history. Revelation is about the End times, in the future. The Beast, The Anti Christ, The Prostitute of Babylon, The Great Tribulation all have to come in a near future
Respectfully, this is way off.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost!.!
@@joeygibbs4775 Christianity is quickly coming to an end. You will see changes on this planet in short time.
Revelation 13:18 states that "Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six.” I can read the Arabic, in that number lies where he comes from, Arabia. The Codex Vaticnous left it Greek, but its clear what John saw and wrote, “Bismillah.”
But the temple is going to be rebuilt. They already have plans to do that.
The third temple has been tried to be rebuilt about half a dozen times. Check out the rebuilding of the third temple at the time of Roman Emperor Julian the Apostate in the 4th century and the 7th century when the Jews under the Sassanid Empire tried. I have my doubts.
@juanisaac5172 I am aware of all that. Isreal still has been working on building this temple again. They even have some sections already built that will be lowered in place when the ground has been made ready. There was some issues on where they were going to put it, since they originally thought it was supposed to go where the Dome of the Rock currently is. However they recently unearthed the location of the original temple, so when excavation is complete, they will put it there. They have the red header without blemish, and they found the old formula for the oil. So the temple will be built. It's simply a matter of time.
It will never be built and antichrist is prince William
You just cancelled half the prophets. Is this the Swiss cheese version of the Bible? I'm seeing so many holes.
No I haven’t. I’ve actually applied the sound principles of hermeneutics and exegesis.
@@DrAndrewC explain what we are living in now?
@@dustyschwartz1576 Dusty, one of the principles of biblical hermeneutics is to begin by answering the questions: (i) What was the occasion for this biblical work? Supplementary to this then is, (ii) When was this written? (This has a direct bearing particularly on how we understand prophetic passages and apocalyptic literature.) (iii) Who was the audience? (None of the Biblical literature was written "to" us. Rather, while its original audience shapes the way we must interpret it, we know that all of Scripture has been divinely inspired "for" us.) (iv) How then did that original, and immediately subsequent, audience understand what was written to them?
By answering these questions we can begin to avoid the modern problem of eisegesis (reading into the text of Scripture, rather than exegeting - drawing out from - Scripture.
* For your consideration: The term "antichrist" does not appear in the Gospels, Paul's epistles, Peter's Epistles. Hebrews, James or Jude, or the Book of Revelation. It is a dangerous eisegetical conflation to other New Testament terms with this very particular Johanine term that only occurs in his epistles and had immediately cultural relevance to the gnostic heresy being peddled in Ephesus at the time John wrote his epistles to them.
* The term "second coming of Christ" does not occur in the Gospels. This is particularly important to note regarding the Olivet Discourse of Matthew 24 and Luke 21 where many Bible teachers eisegetically assume it into the text.
* The Greek word "parousia" translated into English as "appear" or "come" does not mean "return" but more likely means "come in judgment" which is demanded by the context of it in the Olivet Discourse.
* The Greek word translated "world" in Matthew 24:14 , is not "cosmos" (entire world) but "oichoumene" (the Mediterranean/Roman world, also used in Lk. 2:1 - "In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world (Gr. oichoumene) should be registered."
Dusty, each of these points that I have listed are non-controversial and considered mainstream classic theology. By considering these issues it should become apparent to those who know and love Jesus and His Word, that much of the speculative nonsense that has been promoted by so-called Bible-prophecy teachers is a false reading and interpretation of Scripture. I have much more to say about this and have many more articles about eschatology on my website- www.andrewcorbett.net .
Hi can you please explain the Mark and Buy and Sell! Somewhat confusing! Cheers
there are many anti christ but you need to wait for the man of perdition. a physical man a king. anit christ is all against Jesus Christ.
The third temple of God is all us believers. We are where The Lord dwells. There will not ever be a brick and mortar temple again. That would undo the work of Christ on the cross and his resurrection.
I'm sorry to argue with you, but you're incorrect. The 3rd temple will be built next year
Sorry to inform you the Temple Institute exists.. and the book of Revelation states that there will be a temple.
Apparantly, you do not read your Bible much. Revelation does state there will be one.
Excellent and very revealing!
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost!.!
He comes from a political background
Geuss who showed up what a coincidence for such a subject
These people don't know. If they did they would just go to him and point him out. Commen sense. All this is speculations. Nothing factual. Facts is when you can say his name and show us what he looks like.
Queen Elizabeth or her offspring....
Yes King Charles is the Antichrist
U mean lizard babies
The lord will not let him stand for long!!!
My guess is it could Emmanuel Macron
I’m pretty sure it’s not me.
I think the beast across the sea what the speaker referring to in the Revelation is none other the nation that is between Asia and Europe.
That nation lies between the two seas.
When its going to invade any nations in Europe or Asia, it forces have to cross the sea.
PART FOUR
OBEDIENCE TO GOD
Throughout history allegiance to God has always been evidenced by one thing and
that is obedience.
Through our obedience to God and to his ten commandments, for they are a mark between God and his people.
For anyone claiming to know
God that doesn't keep his ten commandments is deceived
and living a lie.
For the truth is not in him.
But whosoever keeps his
word and follows his commandments truly the
love of God is perfected in him.
Our actions and decisions
reveal to God and to the universe who we truly
belong to
So keeping Gods instruction
and his commandments is really that important and it means that much to him and our salvation.
Although the truth sometimes hurts it needs to be told. As it's better to be hurt by the truth than it is to be comforted by a lie
AN ISSUE OF WORSHIP
AND OBEDIENCE
So the mark of the beast will
be a direct counterfeit of Gods mark with humanity
The final test for mankind will be an issue of obedience and who will be served.
It will involve Gods timing
ALTERING GODS TIMES
But what about attempting to alter Gods times as mentioned
in Daniel 7 : 25
Has the Papacy attempted to alter and change Gods times in any way
The answer to that is yes
Pursuant to official catechisms the Catholic Church has also altered the timing of the fourth commandment that discusses the Sabbath and changed the Sabbath day to Sunday.
In their official writings The Converts Catechism Of The Catholic Doctrine.
The Papacy states :
Which is the Sabbath Day in answer to that God's Sabbath was commenced on Friday at sundown and carried through
all of Saturday ending at
Saturday sundown
Just as it still occurs
within Judaism and is adhered
to by practising Jews as was always done and still is throughout time.
So why therefore do we in the Catholic Church observe Sunday Sabbath instead of Saturday Sabbath.
We do so because the
Catholic Church in the Council
of Laodicea in 336 AD transferred the solemnity from the original Sabbath time and altered it to Sunday.
The Catholic Church in doing
this boldly claims to have the power to change Gods Holy Law
Truthfully had the Roman Catholic Church not had such overwhelming power she could not have substituted the observance of the original Sabbath day to Sunday
By transferring Gods Sabbath
to Sunday for which there is no scriptural authority to do so.
Sadly though this practice
commenced by Rome is now entrenched and continued
within so many other Church denominations.
Including by many Protestant Church denominations all of whom came away from Rome because of her apostasy.
But continued their practice
of Sunday worship a practice
that was initiated by Pagan Rome.
ALTERING GODS LAWS
The Papacy has not only
altered Gods Times, but also
His Laws, The Sabbath and God's own Commandments.
Along with altering his holy scripture as the Catholics who have their own version of the bible that is different to all
other bibles.
There are just so many
snares and pitfalls of which to be wary designed to catch us all unaware and lead us astray
We also need to be aware
that Yahweh the Holy name of God Almighty was removed from many of the early bibles in their translation and replaced by the word Lord.
Evidenced in that those who translated the scrolls were not inspired by God as the Hebrew word Baal translates into English as Lord so all who convey Lord God may actually be saying Baal God.
Aware that Baal is Satan who wants equality with God let us therefore not fall into this deception
Whereas God's ten commandments law is sacrosanct and cannot be changed or altered.
Yes it really is that serious
However the Papacy of Rome
has done just that by removing one commandment entirely
and splitting another into two
in order to make ten commandments along
with altering another
entirely.
The Catholic Church
removed the second of Gods commandments which forbids the worship of idols and graven images and they split the tenth commandment into two in order to make ten commandments
They also altered the
fourth commandment
AI,I told My Government fathet, When I was 7...The Box,With A pad you type,On,Will Bring Our world to the End!!!This Was in 1965....
Everyone's got an opinion Too bad probably 99% of these people with their opinions are wrong.
Wow I have never seen someone make such a stretch and leave so much context out. Lol
Caiaphas is the type of the false priest.
The fatal head wound was healed in 1948.
When Christ was crucified, the Jews swore allegiance to Caesar as their KING.
Judah becomes the Gentile beast or the head of the 7 headed beast.
Is Prince Charles charismatic, loved by all, and has no desire for women? I don't think so.
That's what we've been taught but do the scriptures actually say he would be, ‘Charismatic,’ and ‘loved by all?’ As far as women it could be Camilla is really a man, that would explain why she’s always looked horrid as a ‘woman.’ Watch Tim Cohens videos about King Charels lll on RUclips. He also has a book called the Antichrist and a cup of tea. You'll have no doubts the Antichrist is King Charles lll. If you listen. The proof is undeniable.
What r u talkin about this is end time not 70ad
Yuval Noah Harari is Anti-Christ esque but He Is NOT the Anti-Christ,….well not yet in any case. The Person known as the AC has a fierce Countenance,….Yuval is gentle LOOKING! But if he is to nearly die perhaps via an assassin, then he could become fierce looking because of a mutation of that assassination attempt! But yes,…I’m not including thorough scripture references & study to capture that conclusion. But it is accurate to say that the AC does have a coming back to life event.
The Papacy is the Antichrist...
I think you're wrong.
Anyone telling you who the antichrist is, is sadly mistaken. The bible says .. let me say it again... The bible says we will not know who he is till he stands in the temple mount. Now there might be people to watch out for. Ppl to narrow it down to but in no way a precise who until he stands in the temple.
I still think it's Prince William.
Yeah it’s Rome because western Christianity doesn’t know history. Forget all about the other empire that ruled the area for about 1100 years. Ignore it!
Who demanded that Christ be crucified? Thats the anti-christ.
Pope?
Interesting
Revelations 22:10 " seal this letter you sent to 7 churchses, its not for them. Its for americans eating oreos and doritoes in their living room 2000 years from now."
WILL I AM
It is William. So obvious !!!
Yes. Headwound that has healed. Adored by all. Same coat of arms. Will take over for Charles soon. Has mark already (this can be verified by Google).
Could be Harry for there are many Antichrists come in to the world
@@conniedavis9325 What is the Head wound for William ? Seems King Charles is still the Front runner candidate.
We haven't long before a rapid leap into the Heavy Parts of Revelation are Thrust on to the World.
King Charles will be same age as Moses (80 years old) when peak freaky events are unfolding.
plus the Rosemary baby dresses both his mum and wife wore must have meaning red dress white neck coler .
@@conniedavis9325william has a different coat of arms. Yes he had a head injury but it was not fatal and world did not begin to follow him like the Bible says it will when antichrist counterfeits a resurrection
Plainly put, but to the point. I think, he's right- but also, I gotta wonder about the Prophecies, that have more than one, fulfillment.
Passover, King Solomon/Shalomon, Yosesph.Joseph, Yahoshua.Joshua- Son of Nun, etc.
Your wrong and basically you saying the majority of Scholars who have written books and studied revelation that have agreed about the ain’t Christ who is yet to come are wrong.
Also the Jews have had plans to be rebuild the temple for some time, And it will happen.
The Book of Revelation never mentions the word ‘Antichrist’. John wrote The Revelation in AD65 in which he told his audience in Revelation 13:18 “with wisdom you can calculate the number of the beast for it is the number of a man”. This means that the first beast of Revelation 13 was alive and known at the time John wrote to them. There are many scholars who acknowledge this which you may not be aware of.
Video is sitting on 666 comments! So, this is comment 667. Quite interesting hypothesis ... and I half agree ... though I also wonder about Trump as Antichrist! Hmmm
It is obvious Bill Gates isn’t! But the checklist is a bit odd!
I disagree. However, we should listen to different points of views.
The book of revelation never mentioned the anti Christ. You will only find references to the anti Christ in the letters of St John.
That’s right, as I point out in the video and about a hundred times in the various comment responses.
I haven't yet heard that distinction. You appear to refer to the Beast as being the anti Christ.
@@andrewhough8479 I distinguish the two beasts exegetically. The term "antichrist" which is only found in John's epistles, seems to be a reference of the proto-gnostic false teacher Cerinthus who was disturbing the believers of Asia Minor to whom John's epistles are addressed. The apostle Paul makes reference to the man of lawlessness who takes his seat in the Temple of God which could only be a reference to the High Priest, which I believe is the first of the two beasts depicted in Revelation 13.
The number of the beast is not 666 😂
The whole jesus story is actually lanti God. This plastic roman made-up jesus story wirked so well for them to the present. There only one supreme to dethroned, and that is the only one Creator whose name is not even known. But the fact is, as Nimrod sat himself up to build a tower to get to heaven, enter therein and kill God, ever since evil men and women are engaged in doing the same thing. As there is no posibility of this happening then the next step is to kill God from the minds of humans, fake demi gods are brought in, fake gospels, fake saviors, fake comings and ends of the world. It's actually not hard to figure this up..peace!
No,….because He also told them that the temple will be brought to nothing! Crushed, Finished. So is Jesus saying two things at once,….double talk!? No! He is talking about a future event.
What about prince Charles look at his coat of arms to see if this is true!
Prince William 😉
@@davidbolhathe new prince of wales… the dragon 😱
@@davidbolhaYeah, he's been hanging around Israel lately.
Just say it if you know and don't collect money for it!
then who giving the mark of beast that no man will buy or sell with out his name or no.
No.
Who is the Antichrist?
He will arise from the Revised Roman Empire
Daniel 9:26 “After the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be put to death and will have nothing.[g] The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.”
This is perhaps the clearest verse as to the area of the world the Antichrist will arise from. This verse is from the powerful prophetic insight that Daniel had as God revealed to him Israel’s future. God showed him that there would be seventy weeks of years. My purpose is not to provide an explanation of that but to show that as God revealed to Daniel Israel’s future, that He also revealed the part of the world the Antichrist comes from.
Daniel 9:26 reveals to us that the Anointed one will be put to death. The Anointed One is Jesus! When he died on the cross He fulfilled this prophecy. Also predicted was that the “people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.” This happened in 70 A.D. when the Romans conquered Jerusalem, and destroyed the city of Jerusalem and the sanctuary (the temple).
The phrase used is interesting. It doesn’t say the ruler and his people did this, but rather, “people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.” The ruler who will come refers to the Antichrist and also reveals his identity. He will come from what used to be the Roman Empire
Prince William
Claus Schwab
he is a knight & knights take orders.
The glaring issue with this is that the beast and the false prophet are destroyed by Christ at his coming. Are you claiming that Christ has already come a second time?
Thank you for the question Eric. If you are asking if I believe that Christ has returned and judged all - the living and the dead, no I do not. But if you are asking me I believe that the Scripture teaches that Christ would come in judgment to end the Old Covenant, yes I do. andrewcorbett.net/
@@DrAndrewC I just wonder how you deal with the verses throughout the New Testament that say Christ will come with the voice of the archangel and at the last trumpet and the dead will rise, and we who are alive and remain will be changed and we will be gathered to meet the Lord in the air. At that last trumpet is when Christ destroys the beast and the false prophet. The scriptures are clear on that. How can the antichrist be a historical figure if that prophecy hasn’t happened yet. I believe there were antichrists in the past, but there will be a future one as well that fulfill the prophecies. There has never been a mark of the beast either. It’s pretty clear. I believe the scripture is clear that the resurrection is after the great tribulation, but even pre trib and mid trib believers are almost all in agreement that these prophecies have not been fulfilled yet.
@@DrAndrewC also I do not believe God ends his covenants. There aren’t two, but many: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, Christ, … They don’t go away. They build on the former.
@@EricTheBranch Hebrews 8:13 - "¶ In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away."
@@DrAndrewC fine and dandy, but what about my other comment?
catholic papacy
My friend,..., in Matthew 24, Mark 13, Christ points to Daniel and put his prophesy past all in our time, the parable of the fig tree is from 1948, the ac will be the last king out of the four generals Daniel 8 : 9 and a clear picture of him in verses 23 - 25.
It is the one his " policy " that influence the world today, he will no be revealed now, restrianer Daniel 10 :21.( on rapture please) Matthew 24 : 29 - 31.
King Charles 111 , fits prophesy best.
Not looking for him looking for Jesus
Not saying you are referring to me and my sons in the Revived Roman Empire, but we never went to Israel. Neither have my sons. I also already calculated our Gematria - Passed! Praise God! Not Prostitutes and we also are not High Priests. 5-9-2023.
you see why i dont trust any guy with Dr or Phd before their name to come and explain bible prophecy. go and read the book of daniel for yourself.
The antichrist is identified in the second chapter of First John. It clearly identifies the antichrist as a group of people who left the congregation, who denied that Jesus came in the flesh, and who were teaching this doctrine, along with other false teaching, which is addressed and refuted in First John. The Beast was Caesar, who claimed to be God and demanded that people worship him as God, along with the gods of Rome. See, Revelation, which addresses the Great Persecution.
No I don't want to know 2 Thessalonians chapters 1. 2 say he has to be revealed it's a mystery we don't know. I will say this it's nothing to do with the royal family .stop speculating and get on with the preaching of the gospel.
Salacious title for simply reading the characteristics of the AC -
Not enough evidence sorry😊
I don't think anyone on earth knows. I think he's a supernatural being with power to do stuff we cant.
The antichrist will be a human who is indwelled by Satan himself just as Jesus was God in human form.
Im so lost…so who is the mf?
Dont worry about the anti christ and who he might be , know Jesus Christ and follow Him , He is the only "Christ" thats important . Read John chapter 3 , dont waste your time watching this garbage .
You obviously did not watch this video then.
@@DrAndrewC Correct , no reason to .
@@adrianojames7903 Then don't you think it odd, quite odd, that you are disagreeing the very point I have made in this video which you also made in your original comment?
@@DrAndrewC Not really . All that means is your title is click bait , but I am glad to hear that was your point , but why not have a title that reflects your true intention ?
@@adrianojames7903 No it isn't - it is exactly the precise title for determining who the antichrist was, and therefore why we should not be distracted by those who speculate their nonsense which diverts believers away from their focus on glorifying the Christ.
just google it
Wow this is twisted.
Amen
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost!.!
Judas who betrayed Jesus?
😅It is not time for the Anti Christ, God is c9ming to wake up his church and deal with corruption. Watch what happens. Pray and don't be afraid
Jared..
Bill Gates , The Pope, Prince Harry
trump, charles & Kissinger too.
@@williamking816 King Charles your right