If this hadn't gone so public, those charges would have stuck, and an innocent man's life would have been disrupted if not destroyed. Now, we need to hold the officers, their leadership, and the judge who let it continue accountable.
Thank goodness for all of this Video Tape in America. I am Black. WE HAVEN'T EVER BEEN EQUAL, WE ARE CONSIDERED LESS THAN THE 3/5 FROM THE DRED SCOTT CASE. THE WORLD GETS TO SEE HOW WHYTES HAVE THIS HIDDEN PRIVILEGE HERE. WHILE THEY TOLD THE WORLD, THESE N WORDS ARE ALL LYING CRIMINALS, WE TREAT EVERYONE EQUAL. WELL, THIS HORRIFIC SITUATION SPEAKS FOR ITSELF! We will see more of the same, WHYTES WILL CONTINUE THEIR FAKE ACTING AS USUAL, OH WE THOUGHT ALL OF THOSE N's. WERE CRIMINALS AND DESERVED TO DIE TOO!.
Lack of Empathy = It's his TRAINING!! Lack of Remorse = It's his TRAINING!! Lack of Honesty = It's his TRAINING!! Lack of Intelligence = It's why He was HIRED!!
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence and power tripping
Evil and stupid. They only attacked him because the real offender told them it was him - and they believed him, unquestioningly, and just let the offender go. The fact that one was white and the one they were told was the offender was black - draw your own conclusions.
That’s how ALL COPS are. There are no “good cops”. The proof of this is that no “good cops” ever step in while their thin blue line gang members are torturing one of us.
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence, tyranny and power tripping
The judge said there’s was probable cause for the arrest, then they dismissed it. Someone needs to look more into that judge who believed there was probable cause.
They absolutely should. And if he is an elected judge then people need to remember this when they vote. Most people really don't think about how important local elections are and how much impact they really have on your life.
He's going to sue the s*** out of them!! In some states qualified immunity is gone is the cops committed crazy crime, they'll have to pay for it themselves out of pocket!!!!
Every God-damned case he touched needs to be closely examined. His action was atrocious, callous and clearly complicit in a clear case of malicious prosecution of a victim of an unprovoked racially tainted assault and battry.
Why? He did his job and didn't let his feeling get in the way. That was not a trial and it was just a probable cause hearing. The only purpose that judge served was to determine if there was probable cause for the charges to proceed to a trail. Whether you like it or not, there was probable cause to substantiate the charges. even if the contact and tactics was garbage on the police end, the guy still assaulted two police officers. According to the Arizona Revised Statutes, he did commit a crime and he acted with intent. He knew that the victims of his assault were in fact police officers making it a Felony. He was charged with aggravated assault, because that is what he did. You fight cases in court, not out on the street. He is just as much to blame as the police, Plain and simple.
If a person has cerebral palsy that can be seen from a block away. They will have at least a slight limp. They knew he was handicap when they attacked him.
Look, you are never ever going to change policing by making a comment on RUclips. These officers have names, families, addresses, they live in your communities. Ostracize them. Ignore them and their families. Cop comes into place of business to order food? Nope. Cop wife applies for a job at your place of business? Nope. Cop kid in your classroom needs a certain grade to pass? Nope. Match with a cop on a dating app? Nope. The police have made themselves immune from outside pressure; the pressure has to come from within. Being a police officer is NOT a protected class; deny them service, their families employment, their kids an opportunity. They don't think twice about denying your civil rights as seen in this video.
The store reported a white guy causing a disturbance. Cops talked the guy outside the store. Guy points to black guy in the parking and tells them black guy harassed him. Cops let white go and chase black guy. The white guy is probably laughing his a- off.
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence, tyranny and power tripping
Liars cheats and complete lack of character and integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence, tyranny and power tripping
❌ For the 4 BILLIONTH TIME. It's not a training issue, it's an accountability issue. They have ZERO accountability, so they don't care. They have training in Empathy, and they have none of that, so what do you expect. They don't (shouldn't) need training in basic human dignity, that should come natural, but it doesn't because these are heartless psychopaths. Their AZPOST needs to be pulled, and they should be charged, if the Governor really wants to do something start there, otherwise it’s just lip service.
Surprise! This is what you get when you live in a police state. We spend over $400 Billion on the criminal justice system every year. And to think some people still want to spend more.
A direct result of forcing the taxpayer to pay for the crimes of bad cops. Qualified Immunity has to be eliminated in order to sue the cops personally.
"more training" ie giving the cops even more money. every time they do something bad the public finds out about they get rewarded with a larger budget to go buy monster trucks with police lights on them and cool army outfits to dress up in.
The Illinois police officer that was arrested won't get the bodycam footage for 14 months. They want to slow roll any evidence of police criminal behavior.
The police needing training is a deflection. The cop jumped out of his truck and began to assault. He was not investigating he was attacking. Did not matter if the victim was deaf or not.
@@JosephKanoplease share with us this magical ability you seem to have of being able to identify who is dangerous and who isn't, who is deaf and who isnt by simply looking at them. Has everyone forgotten that these officers approached this man with the belief he had just violently assaulted another man? The accusations of assault were false of course but these officers had no way of knowing that at the time and only moments to try and make contact.They also had no way of knowing about the mans deafness until after he had been detained. The tried to ask him to have a seat as they drove up but unfortunately the man couldn't hear them. Why has nobody demanded that the false accuser be charged for creating this whole situation?
@@Mikethebusguypresumed innocent until proven guilty. You don’t get to assume anyone is dangerous. Maybe these cops should have investigated before just believing the word of one man. The man who was actually the real reason the cops were called in the first place. The cops managed not to beat the white guy who they were actually there to trespass. How convenient…
@@Mikethebusguyseems like both you and the cops failed to notice that the shoplifter didn't have a mark on him. Seriously, simple common sense says don't take the word of a criminal and go jump an innocent man. Can't you see this could happen to anyone, including you?
Have a nice day in Jesus' Name... 👇👇😊😊 Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law Summary: Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any. TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 - Deprivation of Rights Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice. Types of misconduct covered include, among other things: Excessive Force Discriminatory Harassment False Arrest Coercive Sexual Conduct Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
Whether this man had disabilities or not, whether he was deaf or not, this cop immediately went to violently punching him. Even an able-bodied person wouldn't have been able to defend themselves against tyrants like these. There was no "get both sides before attacking", no de-escalation, just brutal, immediate violence and then they tased this man while he was on the ground. Unacceptable, no matter whether this person was able-bodied or not, whether he was deaf or not.
@@reydeguerra2807 Well, let's be real. We know the court systems aren't going to do anything to this cop. If you guys really want real change, you guys need to start exercising your second amendments. That's the only way these tyrants will reconsider doing what they love to do
The sheer incompetence of the judge that was presiding over this case. For a judge to see a fellow US citizen, a deaf man, being violently assaulted out of the blue and still push prosecution of this case forward. The Fact that they needed the governor to step in.
That’s not how the judicial system works. There are stages in which a judge can make a ruling that would’ve dismissed the case, but not at the point it was at. The checks and balances of the system were designed so that the prosecutor, not judges decide to move forward with charges.
@@Neberheim at what point does a judge see actual evidence? Secondly, didnt the prosecutor review the evidence (witness testimony and videos of arrest)? Woulsnt the prosecutor have the right to not pursue the case?
Even worse he found probable cause even though these cops had zero credible evidence this guy they assaulted and battered had done anything to warrant cops involvement with him at all in the 1st place. Let alone the level of aggression they did to him, even if he HAD been a valid person worthy of detainment, which he clearly was not.
The judge that allowed the charges to be brought up in the first place should be investigated. He saw the video and said yes, we can proceed with charges. Only after everyone saw the video the charges are dropped.
And what of the man who falsely accused the deaf man of assault? Should he get an award for public heroism? This whole situation occurred because a criminal lied to try and stay out of cuffs and it ended up getting this deaf man and the police officers into a tragic situation. The blame lays squarely with the false accuser for leading police to believe this deaf man was capable of and had already used violence against others. In situations like this officers have only seconds to choose a course of action and when hands come up, how would you have reacted? Maybe you would have invited him out for ice cream?
@@Mikethebusguy Stop making excuses for Blue Line Gangsters! They are required to investigate! They did not. They made false charges against an innocent man to cover up their crimes. There is no excuse.
That was nothing to do with lack of training, the first cop didn't even attempt to communicate with the victim, he jumped right onto him, and the victim used his arms in a defensive stance, just like any other person would do. His lawsuit is gonna be a slam-dunk.
The CORRUPT JUDGE who allowed this case to move forward needs to be investigated & remove from the bench IMMEDIATELY. He's more DANGEROUS THAN THE CORRUPT POLICE DEPARTMENT.
CORRUPT EVERY WHERE YOU GO WORLDWIDE. NOTHING BEING DONE ABOUT IT. MOST OF THEM ARE CORRUPT. THE GOOD ONES NOT ALLOW TO SAY ANYTHING. THEY WILL BE FIRED OR GOT RID OFF. SO THEY KEEP THERE MOUTH SHUT.
@@lindsaygriffeth4146 Can you find me when that happened? The video around 3:55 shows how the incident starts with a drive-by tackle from one of the officers
This really had little to do with the victim being deaf, as the initial officer attacked him immediately upon exiting his vehicle. The assault was not predicated by commands to comply. Let’s not lose sight of that and allow the offending officers or the Phoenix PD to “resolve” this issue with “disabled persons” training. This was another instance of walking while black - plain and simple.
They’re absolutely using Tyrone’s disability to justify their actions. Even an able bodied person couldn’t manage to put their hands behind their back while being held down and tased. The department is trying to avoid having the feds take over by saying all we need is more disability training. 😡
You have no idea what this guy did before the cops rolled up. What was the reason for the response call? Attempted murder? Armed robbery? Attempted rape?
@@rockymntdan1 a white guy they were sent to move on claimed falsely that this guy had assaulted him. The cops acted on that false information without checking. Either way there is no need for that sort of attack.
Have a nice day in Jesus' Name... 👇👇😊😊 Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law Summary: Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any. TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 - Deprivation of Rights Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice. Types of misconduct covered include, among other things: Excessive Force Discriminatory Harassment False Arrest Coercive Sexual Conduct Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
LEARN HOW TO STOP THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR ANY CASE! Fraudulent concealment is a common law doctrine that may be invoked to toll a statute of limitations. Under this doctrine, if a defendant has concealed his misconduct, the limitations period shall start when the plaintiff discovers his claim or should have discovered it with due diligence.[1] It is similar to the equitable estoppel doctrine.[2] The United States Supreme Court adopted the fraudulent concealment doctrine as a federal common law matter in the 1874 case Bailey v. Glover. The Supreme Court stated that the law recognizes that people who commit fraud should not benefit from their conduct. When a defendant engages in fraudulent concealment, the statute of limitations is tolled. Fraudulent concealment occurs when one party intentionally hides or suppresses a material fact that they are legally obligated to disclose with the intent to deceive another party. Here are the key elements required to establish a case of fraudulent concealment: 1. Concealment of a Material Fact: The defendant must have concealed or suppressed a material fact. 2. Duty to Disclose: The defendant must have been obliged to disclose the fact to the plaintiff. 3. Intent to Defraud: The defendant must have intentionally concealed or suppressed the facts to defraud the plaintiff. 4. Reliance: The plaintiff must have relied on the absence of the concealed fact. 5. Damages: The plaintiff must have suffered damages as a result of the concealment.
Look, you are never ever going to change policing by making a comment on RUclips. These officers have names, families, addresses, they live in your communities. Ostracize them. Ignore them and their families. Cop comes into place of business to order food? Nope. Cop wife applies for a job at your place of business? Nope. Cop kid in your classroom needs a certain grade to pass? Nope. Match with a cop on a dating app? Nope. The police have made themselves immune from outside pressure; the pressure has to come from within. Being a police officer is NOT a protected class; deny them service, their families employment, their kids an opportunity. They don't think twice about denying your civil rights as seen in this video.
New Mexico has. Albuquerque PD got a DOJ babysitting not long after cops got violent with a disabled person and things started changing after that. I bet Arizona isn't too far behind, maybe 2027.
The police officer who jumped out of his car and started assaulting him without even investigating or anything and escalated the situation without speaking to him or finding out he even had the right person, needs to be held accountable.
@@Tha_Trigga What technically happened was that a different male had pointed him out when the officer went to the gas station and investigate what was going on there. He just took the random bystanders word that je was assaulted(Which turned out false later) and then went to go stop the deaf man. They MIGHT have had cause to stop him, but not to jump out of their car and immediately go hands on with little to no warning. The most warning the guy had was the cop telling him to stop from inside his car, then rushing him quite quickly with no other real orders until after his hands are already on the guy.
@@Az-dc4nu Not a witness, he was the actual subject of the call. He should be punished sure, but he's not neccesarily responsible for the poor actions of those officers
Even a person without the disabilities wouldn’t have time to comprehend what was happening the first cop was out his truck as he was putting it in park. It was still bouncing back and forth as he tackled the guy
That is so obvious i agree all the way those cops are straig Ka chht up criminals. They're on the force still after that. He has a really good excessive force lawsuit.
Have a nice day in Jesus' Name... 👇👇😊😊 Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law Summary: Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any. TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 - Deprivation of Rights Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice. Types of misconduct covered include, among other things: Excessive Force Discriminatory Harassment False Arrest Coercive Sexual Conduct Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
LEARN HOW TO STOP THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR ANY CASE! Fraudulent concealment is a common law doctrine that may be invoked to toll a statute of limitations. Under this doctrine, if a defendant has concealed his misconduct, the limitations period shall start when the plaintiff discovers his claim or should have discovered it with due diligence.[1] It is similar to the equitable estoppel doctrine.[2] The United States Supreme Court adopted the fraudulent concealment doctrine as a federal common law matter in the 1874 case Bailey v. Glover. The Supreme Court stated that the law recognizes that people who commit fraud should not benefit from their conduct. When a defendant engages in fraudulent concealment, the statute of limitations is tolled. Fraudulent concealment occurs when one party intentionally hides or suppresses a material fact that they are legally obligated to disclose with the intent to deceive another party. Here are the key elements required to establish a case of fraudulent concealment: 1. Concealment of a Material Fact: The defendant must have concealed or suppressed a material fact. 2. Duty to Disclose: The defendant must have been obliged to disclose the fact to the plaintiff. 3. Intent to Defraud: The defendant must have intentionally concealed or suppressed the facts to defraud the plaintiff. 4. Reliance: The plaintiff must have relied on the absence of the concealed fact. 5. Damages: The plaintiff must have suffered damages as a result of the concealment.
Not really his fault. Sometimes their hands are tied. That's why he gave that sarcastic remark towards the DA after the police hearing. I don't believe the judge meant any harm or wrong doing. Now as for the DA. YES absolutely that DA needs to be investigated. These charges should never have gotten to the judge.
This was a preliminary hearing, the judge ruled that there was enough evidence to proceed to trial. Um…. Which was the testimony of the cops, but you had the video which was played which showed the cops were bearing false witness. I know this is a habit of some people in society to believe witness and ignore the video.
What no one seems to say is that these police were reporting to a white male causing trouble at a convenience store. Then they jump the first black man they see.
Cops were there to investigate a white suspect. Within seconds they tackled and beat this black man. Don't tell me this ISNT part of how they train. Overwhelming force at perceived disrespect.
A 'great attorney' would insist on criminal charges against these police officers and some sort of accountability for the DA and judge... instead of forcing taxpayers to pay for their crimes and get a cut for themselves.
You mean the culture of being targeted by stupid people who are simply anti police and have no concept of the risks officers deal with on a daily basis. Or maybe you just choose not to take into account that these officers had been misled by a false report that the deaf man had just assaulted another man? Most people I know don't immediately take up a fighting stance when they see a police officer approaching. I myself have had my door kicked in while I was sleeping and been dog piled by police because of a false accusation. I didn't resist and I didn't get my ass tazed. Fight and even if you are innocent, police are not going to take any chances until you are detained and they can be absolutly sure there is no risk to themselves or others around them before they start asking questions. That is literally the job they are paid to do and yall better believe that without police, the criminals aren't going to try and take you in alive like police do.(Edited for spelling)
@@MikethebusguyNice story. They weren't mislead.... they didn't do their job and did NO investigation. There was no "fighting stance", that's laughable. Cops don't have "targets on their backs"... The occupation doesn't make the top ten of dangerous jobs either. OHSA rates it no. 22. The last couple of years the leading causes of death in cops was covid. Why don't you do some real INDEPENDENT RESEARCH and get a clue. BTW.... after covid it's car wrecks and not gun violence like you pretend. Fool!
Have a nice day in Jesus' Name... 👇👇😊😊 Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law Summary: Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any. TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 - Deprivation of Rights Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice. Types of misconduct covered include, among other things: Excessive Force Discriminatory Harassment False Arrest Coercive Sexual Conduct Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
@@phillipwhite8463 Us as the public can charge these in the Federal Courts ourselves. We just have to have a group for protection and follow through. 👍😉
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence, tyranny and power tripping
-The feds need to take over the Phoenix police. -NO Tyrone’s disabilities had nothing to do with why this happened, but his color did. -The bail was punitive. The judge placed an outrageously high bail that he knew Tyrone could not pay based only on the word of the cops who beat him up. Tyrone was not a flight risk, he was disabled and did not have the means to flee.
Look, you are never ever going to change policing by making a comment on RUclips. These officers have names, families, addresses, they live in your communities. Ostracize them. Ignore them and their families. Cop comes into place of business to order food? Nope. Cop wife applies for a job at your place of business? Nope. Cop kid in your classroom needs a certain grade to pass? Nope. Match with a cop on a dating app? Nope. The police have made themselves immune from outside pressure; the pressure has to come from within. Being a police officer is NOT a protected class; deny them service, their families employment, their kids an opportunity. They don't think twice about denying your civil rights as seen in this video.
Good! However, why on earth did it take so long, and why the hell did this poor man who was the victim of a vicious assault spend 3 weeks in jail? These questions desperately need to be answered and the perpetrators need to be charged.
@@rhargee4014 thank you I meant to say that too. Who the hell would even think of prosecuting this after seeing this? One of these days, the police are gonna screw with the wrong person.
The cops lied in testimony and should face felony charges of assault, battery. False arrest and kidnapping. Minimum 10 years each in maximum security. Send out a very strong message that cops who act in similar manners will be charged and sentenced to a long term for the illegal actions against disabled citizens who had done nothing illegal.
But what makes this is worse is the guy that they were supposed to trespass for being violent, they let go was white and all he had to say was naw it was a black guy and pointed in a direction. The officers made no effort in finding out credible the guy was even though the store pointed him out
0:46 "Governor Katie Hobbs also taking action. She wants police across the state to get more training." The police chiefs obviously don't care about more training. They are happy with what they have in the way of officers.
@@justayoutuber1906 I totally agree, but until The People strip Qualified Immunity away from the Police then it's they who will pay! Simples.... The Police Union's should be abolished!
How sad that the ACTUAL WHITE MALE suspect was treated with respect and allowed time to make up a LIE to deflect attention to a random BLACK MAN who was walking across the street at that moment. The cops jumped on that BS narrative and pummeled that man w/o warrant. There are so many layers to this horrible situation and racism is not even scratching the surface. Hope these officers are fired and charged for assault. Also pray the ACTUAL suspect is charged for falsifying a report as this entire incident started w/him!
Well, if the justice system does nothing about the white male (the cops probably didn't even get his I.D.), maybe someone out there will recognize his azz and issue him a "street" warrant.
Not a random black man. It was reported that the black man even tried to help the stores manager get that white man out of the store because the white man was causing a disturbance.
What kind of person needs training to not attack and assault someone, regardless of race or disability? Are these cops going to jail for violating the law? I doubt it.
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence and power tripping
@alexvpou1 is that supposed to scare me? A bunch of uneducated kids that got bullied in school and enjoy hitting women?! 🤣 😂 🤣 remove qualified immunity then we can talk 😉 badges don't stop green tips
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence, tyranny and power tripping
It seems like the judge that continued the charges against this innocent man should be removed from the bench and charged The officer's involved attacking a innocent man because the person they were supposed to be arresting simply saying that he assaulted him pointing to him and they rushed to arrest him based on his words is proof that both are racist and not fit for being police officer's
And the man who falsely accused the deaf man of assault which led police to believe the deaf man was capable of physical violence as well. What about him, should he just be let off? While certainly tragic for the deaf man, people seem not to consider that these police officers were led to believe the deaf man had literally just committed an act of violence and had no way of knowing of his deafness until after the event was concluded and the man was detained and questioned. They also had little to no time to approach the deaf man, or ask witnesses to clarify once the accusation had been made. Time is not on an officers side in most cases. I also have to wonder when it became normal behavior to fight police officers, even when innocent. It's much easier to just comply and let them conduct their investigations. The man was DEAF, not Blind. Most normal people I know who are innocent of a crime don't instinctively go into fight mode when approached by people in police cars and wearing police uniforms. I HAVE BEEN WRONGFULLY ACCUSED MYSELF AND DETAINED. I did not resist, I did not try to run, I did not try to ask why, I just let them take me into custody because I knew I had done nothing wrong. It is literally the job police officers are paid to do. Resist, even if innocent and police will use whatever means necessary to ensure you are cuffed and unable to harm them or others around you before they ask questions. Without police, who do sometimes make mistakes, I guarantee the criminals won't try and take you alive. They will just smoke you and take your stuff.
@@Mikethebusguy Have a nice day in Jesus' Name... 👇👇😊😊 Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law Summary: Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any. TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 - Deprivation of Rights Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice. Types of misconduct covered include, among other things: Excessive Force Discriminatory Harassment False Arrest Coercive Sexual Conduct Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
@@ensontaylor4836get out of my country coward. We all watched the tape. We all watched the cop jump out of his car and immediately attack somebody who did nothing wrong.
@@dafunkmonsterprolly cuz you racist. Look up civil right lawyer. He has the entire video. Including the white guy they came to arrest. You are racist. The. End.
@@dafunkmonster Not EXACTLY like that, but essentially yeah. A local convenience store had called in a trespass against this drunk white dude who was harassing people outside of their store. The cops arrive, talk to the white dude and he says this deaf black guy he saw right before they got there was harassing HIM. He pointed to where he was walking towards and the cops drove ahead to wait for him.
![Eminem - Fuel (feat. JID) [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/t5H_CewqpKA/mqdefault.jpg)
If this hadn't gone so public, those charges would have stuck, and an innocent man's life would have been disrupted if not destroyed.
Now, we need to hold the officers, their leadership, and the judge who let it continue accountable.
The ahole cop with the sunglasses on his hat in court is especially egregious
Exactly. ALWAYS: FILM THE POLICE!!!
(FTP).
And they actually TRIED to STAND ON SOLD GROUND that their actions were warranted KNOWING fully well that they were doing something wrong.
That’s the only time cops are held accountable. Social media.
Certainly would have
The only reason that this man is free is because it became public knowledge.
Exactly. They knew about this the whole time, *but didn't take any action until the public found out and forced their hand.*
Thank goodness for all of this Video Tape in America. I am Black. WE HAVEN'T EVER BEEN EQUAL, WE ARE CONSIDERED LESS THAN THE 3/5 FROM THE DRED SCOTT CASE. THE WORLD GETS TO SEE HOW WHYTES HAVE THIS HIDDEN PRIVILEGE HERE. WHILE THEY TOLD THE WORLD, THESE N WORDS ARE ALL LYING CRIMINALS, WE TREAT EVERYONE EQUAL. WELL, THIS HORRIFIC SITUATION SPEAKS FOR ITSELF! We will see more of the same, WHYTES WILL CONTINUE THEIR FAKE ACTING AS USUAL, OH WE THOUGHT ALL OF THOSE N's. WERE CRIMINALS AND DESERVED TO DIE TOO!.
100%
And there was video. How many lives have been ruined before cameras everywhere?
Judge found probable cause last week . Judge and prosecutor need to join cops in cell
There needs to be two cops, a DA, and a judge on unemployment for this.
They conspired, the belong in prison. No way that judge or DA saw what the cops claimed happened.
On death row you mean
"unemployment"? so they get to chill at the crib on your dime.. that will teach them..
@@plutotech well... if I said what was really on my mind, I'd be on yet another watch list.
Let's just say their unemployment should be permanent
did the DA & judge see a different video than the rest of us? why wasn't the case dropped since day 1? why punished the victim?
The judge should be held accountable for accepting such a BS case.
Facts!!
The judge who dropped the charges??
But that's what they've always done
It's definitely a violation of his civil rights and the prosecutor should be held accountable for malicious prosecution
@@Quick--What video did you watch? Do your research. You're either misinformed or a boot licker.
Cool, now when do those cops go on trial for assault?
they should actually go on trial for felony aggravated assault with modifiers related to abusing people with disabilities.
Never
And pay him for the time he had to spend in jail (because he couldn't make bail).
What? Dropping the felony charges against the VICTIM is not enough?
@@unknownalien3837 One can hope the feds pile on civil rights charges.
Lack of Empathy = It's his TRAINING!!
Lack of Remorse = It's his TRAINING!!
Lack of Honesty = It's his TRAINING!!
Lack of Intelligence = It's why He was HIRED!!
There's no IQ test to be a cop
@@lastremain7867 pin this comment
Great comment but it’s unlikely you will receive an answer.
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence and power tripping
@@yz250ftony, there is an is an IQ test to be a cop in the USA. If it rises to double figures, you can not be a cop.
It is not a training issue. It is an evil human issue.
100%
Sadly, i think its both. Evil at the top setting the training and rules
Hillbilly morons, with badges, in 2024?! Must be democrats! These idiots have to be prosecuted!
Both
Evil and stupid. They only attacked him because the real offender told them it was him - and they believed him, unquestioningly, and just let the offender go. The fact that one was white and the one they were told was the offender was black - draw your own conclusions.
These two criminal cops need serious prison time and the DA who took so long to stop this and was pushing it should be fired under the ethics code
The way they laughed at what they did to him on body cam was just so disgusting to watch.
What part of their training includes laughing at the person they just assaulted???
That’s how ALL COPS are. There are no “good cops”. The proof of this is that no “good cops” ever step in while their thin blue line gang members are torturing one of us.
They may not be laughing now
Happens all the time cops are disgusting when nobody is looking
It demonstrates how normalised they are to such behaviour.
If this video didn't come out, the victim would have been charged, and the officers failures would go unnoticed.
"Failures" implies the officers merely made a mistake, they violently assaulted an innocent man on the word of a criminal.
Failures. No, more like blatant intentional unnecessary violence. Because they can.
Just like Floyd in Minnesota.
have you seen the entire body cam footage? do yourself a favor if you don't wanna be sheep
that's because the police get to investigate themselves, and you have corrupt judges who cover for the police regardless of the circumstances.
The fact that they immediately attacked him without asking a single question tells me that those cops weren't there to investigate anything.
@@ianbattles7290 The fact that the governor needs to protect citizens from the police is all you need to know.
They never are. You think they learn to investigate with 6 months of training? My barber has more schooling
He is deaf
The cops were there to investigate, but they were called because of some WHITE guy.
They were also responding to a WHITE male causing trouble at a convenience store. So they decided to attack this black man?
Those two police officers are sadistic bullies and need to be behind bars to keep the rest of us safe.
NOT GOOD ENOUGH. New charges need to be filed... against these so called "cops".
Deprivation of rights under color of law
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence, tyranny and power tripping
I agrees new charges need to be files against he supposed "deaf" man that committed aggravated assault.
That's someones son , father.
@lefty5463 yup and so we're those officers. They were someone's father and son.
The judge said there’s was probable cause for the arrest, then they dismissed it. Someone needs to look more into that judge who believed there was probable cause.
They absolutely should. And if he is an elected judge then people need to remember this when they vote. Most people really don't think about how important local elections are and how much impact they really have on your life.
@@Mia-yq1mx Local judges are typically corrupt. Entirely in bed with the city and local law enforcement.
We know most judges across the country are corrupt. They have no checks and balances and we all know power corrupts... completely.
If the story never became public it wouldn't have got dismissed, judge needs to be removed
THAT JUDGE WAS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Oh sure, case dismissed after he spent 3 weeks in jail.
It's going to make his settlement way bigger but he should have never been in there.
this happened in august, its been 3 months not 3 weeks @_@
@@jive100he wasn’t in jail all that time.
He should sue for that 3 weeks, and should win.
Taxpayers will pay for his settlement
These cops need to be fired. This is disgusting they didn't communicate with this man at all.
Now prosecute these garbage policemen, they are violent liars.
Thank the good lord for those cameras being everywhere.
Lol good one guys 😂. If they aren’t in jail yet.. they won’t ever be 😂. Keep sleeping peasants
Amen 🙌
Exactly! These cops are trash and belong in prison.
Don't hold your breath 😂
He was jailed for 3+ weeks for a no crime. Training cannot fix bad policing.
Where is his check?
Exactly.
Its training that got them this way. Bad training onto of more bad training wont solve it.
Or hate for people with disabilities. Bet they vote for Trump.
He's going to sue the s*** out of them!! In some states qualified immunity is gone is the cops committed crazy crime, they'll have to pay for it themselves out of pocket!!!!
The judge that signed off on the charges needs to be disbarred.
100000%
ABSOLUTELY!
100%.
Every God-damned case he touched needs to be closely examined.
His action was atrocious, callous and clearly complicit in a clear case of malicious prosecution of a victim of an unprovoked racially tainted assault and battry.
HATRED/RACIST NEVER PREVAILS.
Why? He did his job and didn't let his feeling get in the way. That was not a trial and it was just a probable cause hearing. The only purpose that judge served was to determine if there was probable cause for the charges to proceed to a trail. Whether you like it or not, there was probable cause to substantiate the charges. even if the contact and tactics was garbage on the police end, the guy still assaulted two police officers. According to the Arizona Revised Statutes, he did commit a crime and he acted with intent. He knew that the victims of his assault were in fact police officers making it a Felony. He was charged with aggravated assault, because that is what he did. You fight cases in court, not out on the street. He is just as much to blame as the police, Plain and simple.
If you're educated enough to become a cop you are educated enough to know right from wrong
The officer didn't even have time to figure out if he was deaf. He jumped out of the car and attacked him. No questions, no investigation.
If a person has cerebral palsy that can be seen from a block away. They will have at least a slight limp. They knew he was handicap when they attacked him.
@@FASBLAQUE definitely. 👍
Look, you are never ever going to change policing by making a comment on RUclips. These officers have names, families, addresses, they live in your communities. Ostracize them. Ignore them and their families. Cop comes into place of business to order food? Nope. Cop wife applies for a job at your place of business? Nope. Cop kid in your classroom needs a certain grade to pass? Nope. Match with a cop on a dating app? Nope. The police have made themselves immune from outside pressure; the pressure has to come from within. Being a police officer is NOT a protected class; deny them service, their families employment, their kids an opportunity. They don't think twice about denying your civil rights as seen in this video.
The store reported a white guy causing a disturbance. Cops talked the guy outside the store. Guy points to black guy in the parking and tells them black guy harassed him. Cops let white go and chase black guy. The white guy is probably laughing his a- off.
Police officers, prosecutor and that judge should still be charged and jailed
YES, the lot of them. There is no way the judge and prosecutor watched those recordings and saw what the pigs claimed happened.
Agreed 👍💯👍
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence, tyranny and power tripping
simple solution, at the next local election, "clean the house"
If they feel they’re justified to act that way then we don’t need them as cops.
Very little people become cops to help people..90% become cops because they need to feel tough feared respected n powerful!
So true, thank you for the comment
The fact that these officers still believe they did nothing wrong tells me that they should no longer be officers.
@@Plant_Parenthood You make a very good point and I say this as someone who fully supports and almost always sides with law enforcement.
Agreed 👍💯👍
Liars cheats and complete lack of character and integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence, tyranny and power tripping
❌ For the 4 BILLIONTH TIME. It's not a training issue, it's an accountability issue.
They have ZERO accountability, so they don't care. They have training in Empathy, and they have none of that, so what do you expect.
They don't (shouldn't) need training in basic human dignity, that should come natural, but it doesn't because these are heartless psychopaths. Their AZPOST needs to be pulled, and they should be charged, if the Governor really wants to do something start there, otherwise it’s just lip service.
You’re spot on!
Surprise! This is what you get when you live in a police state. We spend over $400 Billion on the criminal justice system every year. And to think some people still want to spend more.
A direct result of forcing the taxpayer to pay for the crimes of bad cops. Qualified Immunity has to be eliminated in order to sue the cops personally.
"more training" ie giving the cops even more money. every time they do something bad the public finds out about they get rewarded with a larger budget to go buy monster trucks with police lights on them and cool army outfits to dress up in.
And general lack of character. That is not a training issue.
abc15 rocks for staying on top of stories like this so well. Better than any other news outlet I've come across.
Clearly they nor the police read the comments. Pretty evident 😳
Agreed. Of course between Mesa, Phoenix and Tuscon, they have no shortage of the mayhem to work with.
It’s away about lack of training or no training why do you need to be trained to be a professional
About time they dismissed the fabricated charges. If you want to have your rights violated by an officer, then just visit Arizona for five minutes!
So if I'm a criminal all I have to do is point at a black man across the street and the cops will go away and I can go about my business
Evidently.
lol exactly wtf!
Yep.
As long as you don't film them while you're doing it, they'll run right off.
Exactly 😢
I wonder why there's been such a massive loss of public trust towards law enforcement?
Lost of trust is the first step towards true change
Can't see why?
No clue, why we don't trust the police
@@jojojo1687 Facetious
Because of fake and biased news, obviously.
Probably has nothing to do with INNOCENT people being VIOLATED
Simply NO EXCUSE for police ABUSE LIKE THIS.
They literally jumped out of the car and attacked him!!!
ACAB
They get away with it every day and always have.
Dropped charges? The Feds shud file charges against both cops for civil rights violations. Some fed prison time will soften these hateful cops
so it takes 3 month to look at bodycam footage and determine he did nothing wrong?? our country is so fucked
The Trump Effect: 34x felonies no jail time
@@justayoutuber1906who was the victim?
They just hope everyone forgets about it
Sounds about right. It took Florida about three months before they charged Deputy Eddie Duran for killing Airman Roger Fortson USAF.
The Illinois police officer that was arrested won't get the bodycam footage for 14 months. They want to slow roll any evidence of police criminal behavior.
The police needing training is a deflection. The cop jumped out of his truck and began to assault. He was not investigating he was attacking. Did not matter if the victim was deaf or not.
Yes this! I've been saying this all along. There is no justification for this attack. Deaf, disabled or whole. They just jumped him.
@@JosephKanoplease share with us this magical ability you seem to have of being able to identify who is dangerous and who isn't, who is deaf and who isnt by simply looking at them. Has everyone forgotten that these officers approached this man with the belief he had just violently assaulted another man? The accusations of assault were false of course but these officers had no way of knowing that at the time and only moments to try and make contact.They also had no way of knowing about the mans deafness until after he had been detained. The tried to ask him to have a seat as they drove up but unfortunately the man couldn't hear them. Why has nobody demanded that the false accuser be charged for creating this whole situation?
@@Mikethebusguypresumed innocent until proven guilty. You don’t get to assume anyone is dangerous.
Maybe these cops should have investigated before just believing the word of one man. The man who was actually the real reason the cops were called in the first place.
The cops managed not to beat the white guy who they were actually there to trespass.
How convenient…
@@Mikethebusguyseems like both you and the cops failed to notice that the shoplifter didn't have a mark on him.
Seriously, simple common sense says don't take the word of a criminal and go jump an innocent man. Can't you see this could happen to anyone, including you?
An incorrect execution of a felony take down. Jumping out hot on a contact will get officers hurt by an armed contact.
It took public shaming for the charges to be dropped. Shameful!
And that’s the only reason
That’s proof that prosecuting attorneys are non-thinking police thugs too.
Have a nice day in Jesus' Name... 👇👇😊😊
Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law
Summary:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 - Deprivation of Rights
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice
This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice.
Types of misconduct covered include, among other things:
Excessive Force
Discriminatory Harassment
False Arrest
Coercive Sexual Conduct
Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights
This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).
It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
Those police belong in prison for life. (And so does the governor?)
Whether this man had disabilities or not, whether he was deaf or not, this cop immediately went to violently punching him. Even an able-bodied person wouldn't have been able to defend themselves against tyrants like these. There was no "get both sides before attacking", no de-escalation, just brutal, immediate violence and then they tased this man while he was on the ground. Unacceptable, no matter whether this person was able-bodied or not, whether he was deaf or not.
"this cop immediately went to violently punching him."
False.
You should watch the entire encounter.
No more 'Waiting ' get those cops publicly pulled into custody. Do NOT let cops investigate themselves.
It would take a public effort
both cops will be working for the neighboring county by next week.
They did not investigate themselves. An internal affairs investigator investigated the incident. You sound ridiculous.
@SASDPNV ridiculous is saying that internal affairs is not part of the police when they clearly are. So yes, the police investigate themselves.
@@SASDPNV BOOTLICKER, @jatpack3 100% correct
Now, we the people want the cops to get charged for crimes against an innocent citizen.
We are all in danger with cops like that.
@@reydeguerra2807 Well, let's be real. We know the court systems aren't going to do anything to this cop. If you guys really want real change, you guys need to start exercising your second amendments. That's the only way these tyrants will reconsider doing what they love to do
If one is charged, found guilty then sentenced, then there is still hope. It has been done.
@@xxlibarat0rxx280 Oh, baloney. Cops would just get even *more* violent.
They were Maga.
Both of them should go to prison.
The sheer incompetence of the judge that was presiding over this case. For a judge to see a fellow US citizen, a deaf man, being violently assaulted out of the blue and still push prosecution of this case forward. The Fact that they needed the governor to step in.
The governor should take this judge off the bench.
That’s not how the judicial system works. There are stages in which a judge can make a ruling that would’ve dismissed the case, but not at the point it was at. The checks and balances of the system were designed so that the prosecutor, not judges decide to move forward with charges.
@@Neberheim at what point does a judge see actual evidence? Secondly, didnt the prosecutor review the evidence (witness testimony and videos of arrest)? Woulsnt the prosecutor have the right to not pursue the case?
This has NOTHING TO DO WITH "TRAINING".
It's about not employing officers who want to behave like thugs.
Yeah but the ones who train our officers which btw happen to be a military from another country act as violent as those two cops
That's the thing. They will never change. This us who they are.
Who do you think train the police officers to put hands on you physically?
@@justforgetaboutit5987 What country do they come from.
That part 😢
Keep in mind that a judge didn't see anything wrong.
Even worse he found probable cause even though these cops had zero credible evidence this guy they assaulted and battered had done anything to warrant cops involvement with him at all in the 1st place. Let alone the level of aggression they did to him, even if he HAD been a valid person worthy of detainment, which he clearly was not.
Typically cover their ass good ol boy network. This is an exactly why you can’t trust the police to investigate themself.
I wonder why? 🤔 He needs to be fired along with the 2 officers involved.
🎯
And neither did the Gestapo leader!! 🤬
Thank you for keeping on top of this case!
The fact that it took them this long to drop the charges they should be embarrassed and ashamed!!
Republicans don't have any shame nor embarrassment.
@@IKVKronosOne says the kiddie touching, war mongering, baby murdering leftard😂😂😂
@@IKVKronosOne left and right in america means nothing, one side owned by apaic the other by larry fink.....
The judge that allowed the charges to be brought up in the first place should be investigated. He saw the video and said yes, we can proceed with charges. Only after everyone saw the video the charges are dropped.
These cops should be fired, charged with felony-assault, convicted and sentenced to prison.
DA needs to pay as well.
And, the judge.
@@Olddeadleadfoot Hard to get a Judge, the Judicial Ethics panel has to do that.
And what of the man who falsely accused the deaf man of assault? Should he get an award for public heroism? This whole situation occurred because a criminal lied to try and stay out of cuffs and it ended up getting this deaf man and the police officers into a tragic situation. The blame lays squarely with the false accuser for leading police to believe this deaf man was capable of and had already used violence against others. In situations like this officers have only seconds to choose a course of action and when hands come up, how would you have reacted? Maybe you would have invited him out for ice cream?
@@Mikethebusguy Stop making excuses for Blue Line Gangsters! They are required to investigate! They did not. They made false charges against an innocent man to cover up their crimes. There is no excuse.
They should be in jail. Period
That was nothing to do with lack of training, the first cop didn't even attempt to communicate with the victim, he jumped right onto him, and the victim used his arms in a defensive stance, just like any other person would do. His lawsuit is gonna be a slam-dunk.
The only good thing to come out of this is he will definitely be a millionaire soon
The CORRUPT JUDGE who allowed this case to move forward needs to be investigated & remove from the bench IMMEDIATELY. He's more DANGEROUS THAN THE CORRUPT POLICE DEPARTMENT.
Yes he's
He wanted his 2 mins of fame
How he figured there was probable cause is disgraceful. His name is Nick Saccone
CORRUPT EVERY WHERE YOU GO WORLDWIDE. NOTHING BEING DONE ABOUT IT. MOST OF THEM ARE CORRUPT. THE GOOD ONES NOT ALLOW TO SAY ANYTHING. THEY WILL BE FIRED OR GOT RID OFF. SO THEY KEEP THERE MOUTH SHUT.
Judge wasn't corrupt. Judge was following the law. The prosecutor should never have brought up the charges.
Lets not forget, they attacked him on the word of a suspect they were supposed to be trespassing. And left the suspect at the store.
they attacked him when he punched the cop in the face bro.
@@lindsaygriffeth4146 get your eyes checked
@@lindsaygriffeth4146 Can you find me when that happened?
The video around 3:55 shows how the incident starts with a drive-by tackle from one of the officers
@@lindsaygriffeth4146 you need a mental evaluation, people like you are why cops are out of control
@@lindsaygriffeth4146 We've found the comment's r*tard. They love to out themselves.
This really had little to do with the victim being deaf, as the initial officer attacked him immediately upon exiting his vehicle. The assault was not predicated by commands to comply. Let’s not lose sight of that and allow the offending officers or the Phoenix PD to “resolve” this issue with “disabled persons” training. This was another instance of walking while black - plain and simple.
They’re absolutely using Tyrone’s disability to justify their actions. Even an able bodied person couldn’t manage to put their hands behind their back while being held down and tased. The department is trying to avoid having the feds take over by saying all we need is more disability training. 😡
You have no idea what this guy did before the cops rolled up.
What was the reason for the response call? Attempted murder? Armed robbery? Attempted rape?
@@rockymntdan1 a white guy they were sent to move on claimed falsely that this guy had assaulted him. The cops acted on that false information without checking. Either way there is no need for that sort of attack.
@@roryChampion-re2zg IF that is the whole story, then I would agree. But how many times has the media lied in these cases?
@@rockymntdan1 you know that they usualy lie in favour to police and not the victim?
Two cops a DA and a judge all need to be in jail, that was disgusting
DA Rachel Mitchell, Commissioner Nicky Saccone, T's Public Pretender, and the presiding judge of the Superior Court, Joseph C. Wetly.
This is the American justice system. Judges DA cops all kinda tilt the scale one way.
Have a nice day in Jesus' Name... 👇👇😊😊
Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law
Summary:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 - Deprivation of Rights
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice
This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice.
Types of misconduct covered include, among other things:
Excessive Force
Discriminatory Harassment
False Arrest
Coercive Sexual Conduct
Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights
This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).
It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
LEARN HOW TO STOP THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR ANY CASE!
Fraudulent concealment is a common law doctrine that may be invoked to toll a statute of limitations. Under this doctrine, if a defendant has concealed his misconduct, the limitations period shall start when the plaintiff discovers his claim or should have discovered it with due diligence.[1] It is similar to the equitable estoppel doctrine.[2]
The United States Supreme Court adopted the fraudulent concealment doctrine as a federal common law matter in the 1874 case Bailey v. Glover.
The Supreme Court stated that the law recognizes that people who commit fraud should not benefit from their conduct. When a defendant engages in fraudulent concealment, the statute of limitations is tolled.
Fraudulent concealment occurs when one party intentionally hides or suppresses a material fact that they are legally obligated to disclose with the intent to deceive another party. Here are the key elements required to establish a case of fraudulent concealment:
1. Concealment of a Material Fact: The defendant must have concealed or suppressed a material fact.
2. Duty to Disclose: The defendant must have been obliged to disclose the fact to the plaintiff.
3. Intent to Defraud: The defendant must have intentionally concealed or suppressed the facts to defraud the plaintiff.
4. Reliance: The plaintiff must have relied on the absence of the concealed fact.
5. Damages: The plaintiff must have suffered damages as a result of the concealment.
This had nothing to do with training and disabilities they thought they had the right to do what they did. This was unjustified in every respect.
Look, you are never ever going to change policing by making a comment on RUclips. These officers have names, families, addresses, they live in your communities. Ostracize them. Ignore them and their families. Cop comes into place of business to order food? Nope. Cop wife applies for a job at your place of business? Nope. Cop kid in your classroom needs a certain grade to pass? Nope. Match with a cop on a dating app? Nope. The police have made themselves immune from outside pressure; the pressure has to come from within. Being a police officer is NOT a protected class; deny them service, their families employment, their kids an opportunity. They don't think twice about denying your civil rights as seen in this video.
These cops would beat a deaf and blind person for not complying with their screaming.
It isn't a case of inadequate training. It is a lack of common sense
It’s what happens when sociopaths aren’t held accountable
As the video points out, its not about deaf training. This could have happened to anyone.
@@nobodyimportant76467that's because their superiors are psychopaths.
Lack of a moral compass
No, it is TERRORISM!!!
They don’t need more training.
END QUALIFIED IMMUNITY!!!
Nahhh how else are you supposed to fight crime if you can't fight 😂
@@RoboArc Just do their job correctly and they wouldn't need qualified immunity 🤔. Quit bootlicking
@RoboArc clean your mouth when you're done
New Mexico has. Albuquerque PD got a DOJ babysitting not long after cops got violent with a disabled person and things started changing after that. I bet Arizona isn't too far behind, maybe 2027.
@@jeroldmcarthur5748 ok keep being a crime shill 🤣🤣 ya fkn street urchin
The police officer who jumped out of his car and started assaulting him without even investigating or anything and escalated the situation without speaking to him or finding out he even had the right person, needs to be held accountable.
He knew he had the wrong person. The call was for a white gentlemen acting out at a gas station.
@@Tha_Trigga What technically happened was that a different male had pointed him out when the officer went to the gas station and investigate what was going on there. He just took the random bystanders word that je was assaulted(Which turned out false later) and then went to go stop the deaf man. They MIGHT have had cause to stop him, but not to jump out of their car and immediately go hands on with little to no warning. The most warning the guy had was the cop telling him to stop from inside his car, then rushing him quite quickly with no other real orders until after his hands are already on the guy.
The witness who pointed out the wrong suspect needs to be investigated and possibley put in jail.
@@Az-dc4nu Not a witness, he was the actual subject of the call. He should be punished sure, but he's not neccesarily responsible for the poor actions of those officers
@@taco8951wasn't even a random bystander, it was the original suspect that they had been called on.
Of course officers think they did nothing wrong. Because the badge and the guns means they can do whatever they want.
Even a person without the disabilities wouldn’t have time to comprehend what was happening the first cop was out his truck as he was putting it in park. It was still bouncing back and forth as he tackled the guy
That is so obvious i agree all the way those cops are straig Ka chht up criminals. They're on the force still after that. He has a really good excessive force lawsuit.
I’ve been saying that that, was the very definition of being bum rushed/ambushed.
It takes more time to read your comment than the victim was given to comprehend and comply.
The judge that allowed the case to continue needs to be investigated.
Have a nice day in Jesus' Name... 👇👇😊😊
Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law
Summary:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 - Deprivation of Rights
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice
This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice.
Types of misconduct covered include, among other things:
Excessive Force
Discriminatory Harassment
False Arrest
Coercive Sexual Conduct
Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights
This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).
It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
LEARN HOW TO STOP THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR ANY CASE!
Fraudulent concealment is a common law doctrine that may be invoked to toll a statute of limitations. Under this doctrine, if a defendant has concealed his misconduct, the limitations period shall start when the plaintiff discovers his claim or should have discovered it with due diligence.[1] It is similar to the equitable estoppel doctrine.[2]
The United States Supreme Court adopted the fraudulent concealment doctrine as a federal common law matter in the 1874 case Bailey v. Glover.
The Supreme Court stated that the law recognizes that people who commit fraud should not benefit from their conduct. When a defendant engages in fraudulent concealment, the statute of limitations is tolled.
Fraudulent concealment occurs when one party intentionally hides or suppresses a material fact that they are legally obligated to disclose with the intent to deceive another party. Here are the key elements required to establish a case of fraudulent concealment:
1. Concealment of a Material Fact: The defendant must have concealed or suppressed a material fact.
2. Duty to Disclose: The defendant must have been obliged to disclose the fact to the plaintiff.
3. Intent to Defraud: The defendant must have intentionally concealed or suppressed the facts to defraud the plaintiff.
4. Reliance: The plaintiff must have relied on the absence of the concealed fact.
5. Damages: The plaintiff must have suffered damages as a result of the concealment.
Not really his fault. Sometimes their hands are tied. That's why he gave that sarcastic remark towards the DA after the police hearing. I don't believe the judge meant any harm or wrong doing. Now as for the DA. YES absolutely that DA needs to be investigated. These charges should never have gotten to the judge.
@@DanielsDelivery LAME
This was a preliminary hearing, the judge ruled that there was enough evidence to proceed to trial. Um…. Which was the testimony of the cops, but you had the video which was played which showed the cops were bearing false witness. I know this is a habit of some people in society to believe witness and ignore the video.
Thank you abc15 for covering this story from day one
Training is useless. Send them to prison. That will get their attention. The Phoenix PD will find that the officers are completely justified.
Should never been charged in the first place. These are evil men, judge and prosecutor included.
What no one seems to say is that these police were reporting to a white male causing trouble at a convenience store. Then they jump the first black man they see.
Cops were there to investigate a white suspect. Within seconds they tackled and beat this black man. Don't tell me this ISNT part of how they train. Overwhelming force at perceived disrespect.
Ever watch The Watermelon Man
That's normal in Phoenix. That's why they need federal oversight.
@@mr.b.malarky9219 but he is not white!, why??!!..
Hope a great attorney steps forward to sue the city on behalf of this man.
A 'great attorney' would insist on criminal charges against these police officers and some sort of accountability for the DA and judge... instead of forcing taxpayers to pay for their crimes and get a cut for themselves.
have you seen the entire body cam footage? do yourself a favor if you don't wanna be sheep
@@ensontaylor4836 nice try, bootlicker. these cops are toast. Their qualified immunity is about to evaporate.
@@rstrid5505 not insulting you, no matter how much you insult me. find the entire body cam footage, for your own sake. its on youtube
@@ensontaylor4836 i’ve seen all the videos.
They are trained to do exactly what they are doing. That's what they are hired to do.
Now press charges against the two Phoenix officiers.
And nothing will happen at the end of that process. Maybe they will lose their jobs
As well as the judge who saw probable cause for the charges to stand.
"Training" won't change the "cultural" mind set of most police departments or police officers.
Those guys immediately started the beating. Training won't change that "beat down culture", then claim "officer safety.
You mean the culture of being targeted by stupid people who are simply anti police and have no concept of the risks officers deal with on a daily basis. Or maybe you just choose not to take into account that these officers had been misled by a false report that the deaf man had just assaulted another man? Most people I know don't immediately take up a fighting stance when they see a police officer approaching. I myself have had my door kicked in while I was sleeping and been dog piled by police because of a false accusation. I didn't resist and I didn't get my ass tazed. Fight and even if you are innocent, police are not going to take any chances until you are detained and they can be absolutly sure there is no risk to themselves or others around them before they start asking questions. That is literally the job they are paid to do and yall better believe that without police, the criminals aren't going to try and take you in alive like police do.(Edited for spelling)
@@MikethebusguyNice story. They weren't mislead.... they didn't do their job and did NO investigation.
There was no "fighting stance", that's laughable.
Cops don't have "targets on their backs"... The occupation doesn't make the top ten of dangerous jobs either. OHSA rates it no. 22.
The last couple of years the leading causes of death in cops was covid.
Why don't you do some real INDEPENDENT RESEARCH and get a clue.
BTW.... after covid it's car wrecks and not gun violence like you pretend. Fool!
@@Mikethebusguy nope! Police are violent ego maniacs who earn all the smoke they get.
ACAB
Those cops need to be charged with assault.
Agreed 👍💯👍
Have a nice day in Jesus' Name... 👇👇😊😊
Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law
Summary:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 - Deprivation of Rights
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice
This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice.
Types of misconduct covered include, among other things:
Excessive Force
Discriminatory Harassment
False Arrest
Coercive Sexual Conduct
Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights
This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).
It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
@@DanielsDeliveryThe cops should be charged with the capital crime part of USC 241 and 242
@@phillipwhite8463 Us as the public can charge these in the Federal Courts ourselves.
We just have to have a group for protection and follow through. 👍😉
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence, tyranny and power tripping
The fact that one of the officers was allowed to wear a baseball cap with sunglasses on them tells me all I need to know about that department.
They need to be held accountable and then fired and sued
That wasn't a training problem. That was a bullying thuggery problem with a badge and gun.
If you look at other videos concerning this Department, it is very common.
That’s was a white male racist nature
-The feds need to take over the Phoenix police.
-NO Tyrone’s disabilities had nothing to do with why this happened, but his color did.
-The bail was punitive. The judge placed an outrageously high bail that he knew Tyrone could not pay based only on the word of the cops who beat him up. Tyrone was not a flight risk, he was disabled and did not have the means to flee.
Look, you are never ever going to change policing by making a comment on RUclips. These officers have names, families, addresses, they live in your communities. Ostracize them. Ignore them and their families. Cop comes into place of business to order food? Nope. Cop wife applies for a job at your place of business? Nope. Cop kid in your classroom needs a certain grade to pass? Nope. Match with a cop on a dating app? Nope. The police have made themselves immune from outside pressure; the pressure has to come from within. Being a police officer is NOT a protected class; deny them service, their families employment, their kids an opportunity. They don't think twice about denying your civil rights as seen in this video.
Bodies needed for for profit prison.
So they just jumped out the car and beat him up and this is what you call policing in America
Good! However, why on earth did it take so long, and why the hell did this poor man who was the victim of a vicious assault spend 3 weeks in jail? These questions desperately need to be answered and the perpetrators need to be charged.
The only reason it was dismissed is because of the publicity.
The prosecutor should be fired! Who in the hell after seeing the evidence would’ve even charged this guy to begin with.
And judge
@@rhargee4014 thank you I meant to say that too. Who the hell would even think of prosecuting this after seeing this? One of these days, the police are gonna screw with the wrong person.
DA Rachel Mitchell, Commissioner Nicky Saccone, T's Public Pretender, and the presiding judge of the Superior Court, Joseph C. Wetly.
DAs are in cahoots with cops because cops bring them criminal suspects to justify the existence of our corrupt legal system.
The union
Why aren’t the cops being charged . That was assault assault at the bare minimum . And the fact that the guy lied on him he needs a charge as well .
End qualified immunity!!!
Thank God Tyrone’s ridiculous charges were dismissed. Now let’s prosecute those two officers please!
@@mariannallan2204 and the guy who pointed him
Thank you ABC15 for defending this man’s civil’s right.
Are you kidding 😂
The cops lied in testimony and should face felony charges of assault, battery. False arrest and kidnapping. Minimum 10 years each in maximum security. Send out a very strong message that cops who act in similar manners will be charged and sentenced to a long term for the illegal actions against disabled citizens who had done nothing illegal.
But what makes this is worse is the guy that they were supposed to trespass for being violent, they let go was white and all he had to say was naw it was a black guy and pointed in a direction. The officers made no effort in finding out credible the guy was even though the store pointed him out
0:46 "Governor Katie Hobbs also taking action. She wants police across the state to get more training."
The police chiefs obviously don't care about more training. They are happy with what they have in the way of officers.
What a sad day the only reason anything is getting done is because it blew up on the social media
These cops better be locked up for this.
This is absolutely disgusting.
And now sue city for millions
Sue the cops personally and the department for everything they got
then taxpayers pay and they have less money for training. Instead put the officers in jail
Forcing taxpayers to pay for the crimes of bad cops is why this keeps getting worse. You are not 'losing' your rights; you are selling them.
@@justayoutuber1906 you think more training is gonna help? Get a clue. They already know what’s right and wrong. No one holds them accountable.
@@justayoutuber1906 I totally agree, but until The People strip Qualified Immunity away from the Police then it's they who will pay! Simples.... The Police Union's should be abolished!
How sad that the ACTUAL WHITE MALE suspect was treated with respect and allowed time to make up a LIE to deflect attention to a random BLACK MAN who was walking across the street at that moment. The cops jumped on that BS narrative and pummeled that man w/o warrant. There are so many layers to this horrible situation and racism is not even scratching the surface. Hope these officers are fired and charged for assault. Also pray the ACTUAL suspect is charged for falsifying a report as this entire incident started w/him!
They actually attacked Mr. McAlpin before the White guy ever pointed at him.
Well, if the justice system does nothing about the white male (the cops probably didn't even get his I.D.), maybe someone out there will recognize his azz and issue him a "street" warrant.
No, racism is at the heart of the matter. The other man was allowed to talk and lie, because of his genetic immunity.
One cooperated, one resisted. It is that simple.
Your obsession with race shows you're the racist. Stop projecting.
Not a random black man. It was reported that the black man even tried to help the stores manager get that white man out of the store because the white man was causing a disturbance.
these cops need jail time
They only dismissed it because of public outrage. It never should have gone to trial. Those cops should be charged.
It’s not about training. It’s about culture and the type drawn to this job.
Your right. This culture sees criminals based on skin color and react with violence instead of reasoning
BOTH it takes over a YEAR to cut someones hair, yet 8 weeks in the academy and a few months on the street
@@wswillett Bullies are attracted to jobs that let them exert authority over others.
It's things stuff like this and civil asset forfeiture that make the police the highest form of organized crime. They are the true criminals
They need to be fired charged and sued
end qualified immunity
What kind of person needs training to not attack and assault someone, regardless of race or disability? Are these cops going to jail for violating the law? I doubt it.
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence and power tripping
That kind of behavior is not right whether the victim is disabled or not.
If they took 10 sec to try to talk to him first they would have seen he was deaf, and maybe that he was disabled with CP
Agreed. So when does it become legal to defend yourself with deadly force?!
@@mustangdemon87 you will always lose against the thin blue line gang
@alexvpou1 is that supposed to scare me? A bunch of uneducated kids that got bullied in school and enjoy hitting women?! 🤣 😂 🤣 remove qualified immunity then we can talk 😉 badges don't stop green tips
The fact that they said they felt justified after basically jumping that man smh disgusting
Liars cheats and complete lack of integrity. Judge had chance to correct cop’s corrupt practices but sided with the tyrants. Whole justice system is messed up…top to bottom People in Phoenix must be so proud and secure that any interactions they have with law enforcement will be handled with fairness, professionalism and integrity. MacAlpin deserves million dollar lawsuit paid for by cops and local justice system but…. taxpayers will suffer yet again for the incompetence, tyranny and power tripping
Regardless of the hearing issues or lack of training that doesn’t excuse their actions. They immediately attacked this man. They should be prosecuted
It seems like the judge that continued the charges against this innocent man should be removed from the bench and charged
The officer's involved attacking a innocent man because the person they were supposed to be arresting simply saying that he assaulted him pointing to him and they rushed to arrest him based on his words is proof that both are racist and not fit for being police officer's
This is ridiculous. Those two officers should had been the ones facing criminal charges and not this guy.
And the man who falsely accused the deaf man of assault which led police to believe the deaf man was capable of physical violence as well. What about him, should he just be let off? While certainly tragic for the deaf man, people seem not to consider that these police officers were led to believe the deaf man had literally just committed an act of violence and had no way of knowing of his deafness until after the event was concluded and the man was detained and questioned. They also had little to no time to approach the deaf man, or ask witnesses to clarify once the accusation had been made. Time is not on an officers side in most cases. I also have to wonder when it became normal behavior to fight police officers, even when innocent. It's much easier to just comply and let them conduct their investigations. The man was DEAF, not Blind. Most normal people I know who are innocent of a crime don't instinctively go into fight mode when approached by people in police cars and wearing police uniforms. I HAVE BEEN WRONGFULLY ACCUSED MYSELF AND DETAINED. I did not resist, I did not try to run, I did not try to ask why, I just let them take me into custody because I knew I had done nothing wrong. It is literally the job police officers are paid to do. Resist, even if innocent and police will use whatever means necessary to ensure you are cuffed and unable to harm them or others around you before they ask questions. Without police, who do sometimes make mistakes, I guarantee the criminals won't try and take you alive. They will just smoke you and take your stuff.
have you seen the entire body cam footage? do yourself a favor if you don't wanna be sheep
@@Mikethebusguy Have a nice day in Jesus' Name... 👇👇😊😊
Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law
Summary:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 - Deprivation of Rights
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice
This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice.
Types of misconduct covered include, among other things:
Excessive Force
Discriminatory Harassment
False Arrest
Coercive Sexual Conduct
Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights
This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).
It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
@@ensontaylor4836get out of my country coward. We all watched the tape. We all watched the cop jump out of his car and immediately attack somebody who did nothing wrong.
Just a reminder, these cops were answering a call about a white suspect and rolled up and immediately attacked the black guy.
the white guy said the black guy bumped into him and they went after him and left the white guy alone
"Just a reminder, these cops were answering a call about a white suspect and rolled up and immediately attacked the black guy."
I don't believe you.
@@dafunkmonsterprolly cuz you racist. Look up civil right lawyer. He has the entire video. Including the white guy they came to arrest. You are racist. The. End.
Not true. Watch the full video on police activity.
@@dafunkmonster Not EXACTLY like that, but essentially yeah. A local convenience store had called in a trespass against this drunk white dude who was harassing people outside of their store. The cops arrive, talk to the white dude and he says this deaf black guy he saw right before they got there was harassing HIM. He pointed to where he was walking towards and the cops drove ahead to wait for him.
Any charges for the cops????
Address the judge as Your Less Than Honor
@@duewhit310 Your Dishonor