The Un-Fixable Focus is now FIXED! - Part 4
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- I have finally solved the mystery to the Incorrect Component Install wheel speed sensor codes! Hopefully what I've learned and shared will help you if you run into this issue!
Amazon Store Goodies
www.amazon.com...
Topdon Phoenix Smart
www.topdon.us/...
Donations to support the channel can be made here
Cashapp $AutoDiagYT
Venmo @AutoDiagYT
Paypal @AutoDiagYT
#topdon #diagnostics #Picoscope #autorepair
That was crazy. I’m actually at a loss of words on how Ford confused that part with an “A” to a “D”. Great job figuring that out and sharing the entire process. 👊
this fix took so long he went from hoodie weather to t shirt weather lol
Naw my friend that’s Alabama weather lol snow today, summer time tomorrow
😂😂😂😂
THANKS for sharing this with us. We struggle every day with this parts game.Wish our customers really knew how hard we all work to repair their rolling computers
I am not surprised by anything FoMoCo does. In the seventies, a 1972 Ford Econoline came into my shop for a tune up. It came back about 2 weeks later with lack of power and misfires. He was irate. Dwell and spark timing was way out of spec. I saw that a lot of the ignition point's rubbing block was worn off inspite of adequate lubrication. Further inspection revealed that the distributor's cam was never polished at the factory and still in sand cast form. He confessed that 2 other shops couldn't tune it either. I called Ford to get a new distributor cam and was told that even though I had the distributor's part number, they wouldn't sell the cam because Ford changes design throughout the model year. I fixed it by installing an aftermarket electronic ignition system that didn't care if the cam was rough. That was my customer for life after that.
Very very very impressive fix from a very smart diagnostician. Those captures are gold. Never ever seen anything like that coming out of an ABS sensor. Thank you so much for sharing your experience.
There's your problem lady. That was a fun one.
that is absolutely insane mate . something i have never seen . superseded parts i have seen that you end up needing to change and array of other bits to go with it . but not sensors that don’t work the same as the original part . props to you my friend for sticking with it and bringing us along for the ride . hope that customer appreciates your persistence and has got deep pockets 🤣🤣🤣 that bill can’t have been cheap 🤪🤪🤪🤪
Jake, this is probably your best case study yet. Great job and having the patience to see it through to the end. This case study just proves that you have to really do some in depth research and sometimes guess to get the correct parts. I'm willing to bet most shops and techs would never have figured this one out.
I had a shop put the wrong bearing on a later model ford, eneded up scoping it to learn how it works.. 8 pulses staying still, 10 pulses forward and backwards, it's a motorcycle encoder with a module controlling the output. Nice job! 1st time I seen this I was blown away as well. Thanks for taking the time to take us along.
I have a clean capture if you want me to share with you
Bravo, Jake!! Your persistence paid out! Fantastic series of videos!
Seems almost criminal that Ford doesn't supply the right sensor by the VIN number - the time and money spent because of that is appalling.
This confirms that the correct sensor does talk to the ABS with data packets, while the others just output a square wave. And not a word about it, anywhere!
As a shop manager... I can assure you the fix didn't "pay off"
@@johnriley7053 Completely agree! The only positive return was to overcome the challenge and the knowledge gained. Under some circumstances, it could be viewed as a learning cost, making it a very expensive learning.
We do these for the love of it. Many shops would have shipped it unfixed long ago
Saga did NOT disappoint! Ivan & Keith Def need to check it out. Congratulations on a hard-fought win!
Wow you very likely saved many techs countless hours in the future! Thanks for sharing and showing those captures!
Mr.O says (I didn't build it and I didn't buy it and I didn't break it ) YOU FIXED IT ! charge for your time brother ...
One of the smartest guys in the industry, right up there with Bernie Thompson.
Thanks but I'm not anywhere near the level of Bernie
Aight calm down now brother
@@autodiagyt Above the average bear...
Hi Jake! This has got to be craziest case study that I've ever seen. Thanks for bringing us along as I'm sure most viewers learned a lot from this issue. Keep up the good work!
I had the same car with the same issue. The left side rear speed sensor.
The owner of the shop got me after market. After some digging I found that the sensor were made in hungry. The ones I got were made in Mexico.
I told him we need to get these made in hungry.
The customer decided to take to the dealership.
Never knew what happened.
This confirms my diagnosis.
Thank you for showing this video.
thank you for that last scope recording
I feel like this is totally a Ford thing. They do so many bizarre things with parts and diagnostics sometimes. It is crazy it took that long and was that difficult. Good job on you for figuring it out.
So difficult to be able to stay focused on a job like that in a money making dealership environment. Well done.
Yes I agree.
Speaking of not being able to get the correct sensors . I have a Taurus that i could not get a correct factory fuel regulator pressure sensor for and all the aftermarket fprs had the wrong ohmage . I went through 20+ aftermarket sensors and finally had to get one from the junk yard.
Your patience is amazing
jake man that rabbit hole was deep. the scan tool was not lying, it said that was the wrong sensor. man its tough to know when to trust your scan tool and when not to. but in this case if you had you still would have been in hot water as ford screwed the techs with this crazy sensor and not list it as a single part number and have it only as part of the whole hub assembly. Man good detective work to hunt this one down.
These are the sort of jobs where that feeling of personal satisfaction , accomplishment and not giving up is like no other. Money reward goes out the window.
Also you finally get to have a decent nights sleep.
Well done
Thank you for the education and the time you have put into diagnosing. Need more mechanics with the knowledge that you have shown us. Keep up the good work sir.
Not surprised. Currently working on a edge and needed the bracket to clip the bumper to the quarter panel. Ford has the part listed as a "license plate reinforcement bracket". This part is no where near a license plate nor is it a reinforcement part. lol
Nice, definitive Series! Jake.
Keep em coming
I had known for the last year or so that BMW uses sensors that send a data packet to determine speed and direction, but I had no idea Ford was using it, let alone on a Focus from 11 years ago!
Lab scope everything, and assume nothing.
Isn’t that crazy!
Never say your going to give up, your just like the Energizer bunny your keep moving forward. Great diagnostic video.
This has to be one of the most amazing Video's I have ever watched - Makes me want to throw all my tools in the garbage- LOL
Jake, if you’re not charging $225/hr for your services you are short selling yourself. Seriously……phenomenal skills you are loaded with, brother.
Fantastic series! As always, you do an outstanding job of diagnosing & sharing your findings with us! You mentioned recouping some of your lost time. I bill for all my time in cases like this. It's not your fault that mis-information made the diagnostic process take longer. The customer should pay for your time as you are a diagnostic/electrical specialist. I explain this to my shops & insurance companies.
I still billed most of it but when I have a customer that is as easy going as this one I tend to be easier on the bill. Hopefully the videos will make up for the rest.
what is the difference in ohms of the sensors, as a ford tech of over 30 yrs i always made comparisons and kept notes. I'm retired now thank god. I feel your pain!
The only time I look at ohms is a VR sensor. These MR sensors are digital so you are not seeing anything definitive with a meter. I’ve seen some MR sensors read OL but work perfectly, they just have millions of ohms of resistance because it’s a power supplied to a power converter to a micro processor.
nice ride along Jake, omg on the billable invoice, half to ford half to owner omg,
hard fought wins are the reason we get out of bed in the morning. We all have a "wrong parts drawer". Good thing you are young, you may find a place for all those sensors and hubs before you retire :)
I found a place. The back seat of the car, they fit nicely there lol.
The hall-effect sensor inside of those Ford sensors probably has programming that is different between them. Yes, some hall-effect sensors only need 1-wire to communicate digital information and have programmability that needs to be set for your application. The 1-wire protocol similar to I2C but with one-wire. That programmable data is usually dealing with magnetic sensitivity, magnetic orientation and a *_programmable identification number_* that can be read by the software in the module. If the sensitivity or orientation settings are incorrect for that hub it might just not detect the rotation, _but if the ID is not recognized by the software in the ABS module_ then who knows what it will do. The ABS modules were probably getting programmed with newer firmware that didn't include the other IDs for those parts, so when you updated the firmware it no longer recognized the other parts as valid and usable. IMO, it was an ABS software issue. Ford can fix this with software but probably won't.
The 1-wire protocol is well documented so if you can figure out the exact IC inside the plastic molded Ford sensors and get their IDs then someone can probably work out how to reprogram the ID in the sensors with an Arduino, too. Would just need to know the IC part number and work out a circuit to communicate with it at 12v...
Edit: Some of the hall-effect sensors also have a configurable output mode.
Yeah, one sensor is probably digital and the other probably set to pulse output. This makes sense to me.
Thank you for sharing this series with us. Much appreciated Sir
Excellent work seeing that job through to the end knowing that you can’t recover what you’ve invested! But to then make the time to hook up the scope and find the answer after you knew it was repaired? Beyond excellence. Makes you wonder if we’re a little twisted when the satisfaction of the fix is worth more than the money made.
Jake
First - AWESOME series of videos and congratulations on figuring it out! Really amazing work and the sign of a master diagnostician!
Second - I'm one of those damn engineers that mechanics complain about ;-). Since my area is electronics I've spent a lot of time digging through scope traces I have this observation.
I noticed on the scope traces an interesting thing. At these time stamps there's another very slight signal anomaly that seems to be on both channels:
Time stamp number of time intervals from the left side
22:35 +1 - I had to pause twice to get to a 2nd frame with the same time stamp
22:40 +2 - same as above
23:05 +2 - after you paused the display at about 23:01, the signal I'm mentioning is 5 time frames to the left of the blue "data packet"
For a time length that's about the same as the "data packet" on the blue channel there's what looks like the same time length "noise" particularly on the red channel.
I'm wondering if the ABS module tries to pull down the signal and on the blue channel it can, so it accepts the sensor as being correct. On the red channel when it tries to pull it down since the signal doesn't pull down it doesn't accept it as the correct sensor and that's why the error is shown.
Alternatively, the sensor sends this packet and the "noise" I noticed is really noise ;-).
Question: Did you time the frequency of the "data packets" to see if they're regular?
Thanks again for an awesome set of videos about this puzzle.
Mark
I didn't go into that much but I think the noise was ignition related.
notice the shape of the signals. the red trace pulls down stays down then goes back up. where the blue trace only reports the start and finish of the segment.
or is it reading the space in between segments?
The one it's happy with must have a chip inside that is doing processing and reporting the data back, so one is an 'active' sensor, whereas the other one is a 'dumb' sensor where all the processing is done on the main module.
That experience is exactly how we in the industry learn. It is an ordeal of research and frustration. That same experience has it's own inward reward. That same experience is what you the customer have for a very reasonable cost. Just saying, the old school guy!
I had one come in and both rear didn't work but I had a mini signal on the scope. The fix was water in a rear connector. Blew it out with some WD-40 and it came back to life
I haven't watched the video yet accept for the intro. I enjoy seeing that huge smile of success. Been waiting for this!
I’ve been tenured with JLR and with Ford. It is quite surprising with Fords market size as a brand, that they can have so many part incompatibilities by vin. I have ran into this with many of their sensors especially MAP sensors. Loved the comment sections quick jump in the last videos to “I told you it was an incorrect CCF” haha I will tell you though that the verified data and good known in the very end of the video is extremely valuable. Thank you for taking the time to make these videos.
Thanks for the detailed explination.
Hi Jake, great job with this diagnosis and repair. Not many techs would have had the knowledge and patience to get this car fixed.
Dude very nice work. Can't say I've ever seen that either so this video is invaluable.
Wow.. wow, no words.. Thank you Sir!
Hey Jake, you're the man . Great work and you nailed it , thanks brother 🇦🇺
Cool.. I knew that's what it was 5min into the first video. Great video series 👍and the DLG from AZ I know will also work because I been down this road.
This one kicked your rear, but at the end you beat it. Great diag video. I would of never suspected the speed sensor itself.👍👍👍👍. Worth saving this information on the log book. Thanks.
Jake have a look at video below, something similar but abs fault prevents starting
As we get into the era of self driving cars, I can see why engineers would want bidirectional monitoring of wheel motion. Typically design features are added slowly over years, and they don't like to keep too many parts on the shelf because of stocking issues. So, we should not be surprised to find higher level tech that might not be important to this model. I'm a little surprised that Ford hasn't offered a tsb to explain your kind of frustrating experience.
WOW.....What a journey ❤❤❤ thanks Jake🎉🎉🎉
That was really a great video ! Thanks so much for this invaluable lesson.
lost focus while working on a focus!!! Thanks for posting the series of videos!
Recently I also did several similar daunting repairs like that but got paid less. This is the only issue in this field.
Looks for me as AK protocol. So indeed - speed pulse and some data package e.g. sensor gap, direction.
Glad to see you figured it out. That headache gone... Great Video
Great work at sorting that one out
Class in session with this series 😵💫
That was a great series Jake! I'm wondering if this could be a SENT sensor. Instead of the usual signals, it sends data to the module. Talks to the module reporting information about whatever the sensor is designed to monitor.
I do know they are starting to use them in some European vehicles.
After seeing the scope pattern it seems to me it's a type of data packet somehow so pretty similar to a SENT
I had a flash back to Pine Hollow having a timing code with all new parts and 1 phaser was a little off on the timing mark the pico showed it but it was actually a little luck and knowledge he found it
I forgot to say the timing marks aligned but the camshaft lobes were off because of it being the wrong phaser
I remember Keith from LT1 having a similar problem a couple of months ago, but this was with a cam sensor on a Cadillac with a V6. GM told their dealers that if they did not have this specific number in stock, it could be superseded to another part number instead. In my opinion, I don’t think they knew what the difference was; they probably looked at it as a way of saving money on inventory. This is typically seen in the aftermarket, where they attempt to consolidate part numbers.
Wow, that was quite the ride!
Glad you enjoyed it. I sure didn’t lol 😂
This was crazy! Great series
I think in first part ask you does have magnet in that hub... 11:25 now, can you mount old sensor in new hub, and opposite? 12:43 Oooo, you already did... Awesome example.
The hub is not the issue only incorrect sensors
@@autodiagyt True.
Great Job, unstoppable mechanic!
Thank you Jake!
Absolutely amazing work, both diagnostic and detective!
I hope the algorithm works in your favor.
I'm editing a series at the moment on a 2006 Hummer "From Autopsy to Pavement", but need to put it on hold and rush out a "Helping a Veteran, who helps Veterans" "Gold Treatment Brake Service" I got emotional over it and did the work labor free...
THANK YOU THANK YOU
Great video all true about parts.really sucks.hopefully gets better soon.thanks for sharing this.have a good one Jake
This is diagnostic gold
Persistence always pays. Great job👍👍
Keep a full set of all those sensors in your tool box and that way you can just swap them in one by one until you find the one you actually need that seems the most reliable method for getting the right part to fix this car and I bet that is what the Ford techs do also but it is nuts for real for real
You did great! Very frustrating for the dealer to give you wrong parts. Been there and done that many times in the last 40 yrs. You have perseverance that's for sure!😂 Good job! I wonder what the front signals look like?
They are normal MR sensors so the pattern they make is like the red trace in the scope capture
This is where dealership ties really help. Props to you, aint no service data for that type of work! How did you find out that the hub came with a new wheel speed sensor? Makes you wonder whoever changed those hubs had to have that same issue and because they didnt do anything about it, they just punted the car. Think about doing the hubs on that car and then discovering that issue? Its a super easy problem to solve. The shop punted the car and you were left to pick those pieces!
Congratulations!
Amazing diagnostic work. Even though the answer was there from the start. Wrong component fitted. Wrong new parts can be very frustrating. Was the correct sensor a SENT sensor ?
awesome video series. This is crazy
Outrageous situation since here in the Uk you start with the registration number to get parts. Good work
Excellent diag. I love watching your diags.
Bravo Jake. Really glad i watched this. Ive been battling a cam and crank sensor issue with a caddy that seems eerily similar .
Well done 👍
Great video!!! Thanks for sharing all that informations. I was wondering would the signal from front sensor be the same like this good one from rear, maybe it would help diagose it little faster.
The front sensors use a standard MR signal just like the Red trace in the scope capture.
The problem could be inside bearing hub . Connectivity to the sensor. Or just design issues.
Definitely not a hub issue. The sensor works fine in the aftermarket hub. This is 100% just a wrong sensor issue on Ford's part.
Thank you for all your videos.
I"m not a mechanic but i always learn a lot. This series was a case study i'm sure for even season diagnosticians. For a DIYer like me, it's just something to file away for some direction to go in. More reenforcement to never use after market parts for anything electronic. Thanks again
So then the correct sensor has to have some kind of circuitry in it that would produce that signal without movement that allows it to create that small data packet.
Yes
wow never expect that ,so my understanding that sensor is like a can bus also must be it talk
thanks really good video
More like a SENT module I believe
Victory is sweet! 👍
That was a brutal job! thanks for sharing. One question, was the scope lead hooked up to the "hi" or "lo" side of sensor in order to get the wave form?
Both leads connected. Same as in part 1
Resources and Repairs are falling lower and lower on manufacturers priority list these days, i've been getting my butt kicked by things like this everyday it seems like. Have a great day
Looking forward to my new Pico arriving next week.
Learn it and use it! One of the best investments you’ll ever make.
Awesome, one heck of a learning series!
Good job.
Well done sir!
Awesome Job!!
I knew you would fix it my friend sometimes we get that one that keeps us up at night lol
No testing would have figured that car out. Talk about getting screwed Jesus dude that is wild!
So I was wrong after all, I guessed configuration/software version fault. It turned out to be the wrong documented wheel speed sensor. I am fairly certain you can get just the correct wheel speed sensor if you order exactly the part number. Could you please provide that in the description or a pinned post? At least people don't have to buy a hub bearing just to get the sensor...
Part number is in the video
Wow, a lot of parts and no help from ford or scan tools. I believe the dual direction sensor outputs a square wave In reverse the signal is reversed . Basically inverting the signal. from your captures, the data in the blue trace may define forward or reverse. Parts Cannon sponsored by ford! The D version cost is $32 and the A version is $23. a lot more processing going on in the D version. Not a common signal coming out of that sensor.
And the one by the vin cost 40 something!