You people are doing amazing job!!! By making law formulas, easy like mathematics awesome. Providing everything as per my requirements like chronologically. Made my job easy ! 😂❤️ Thank you! First for Rapid Revision Series and Now for these Judgement.
Muslim Women protection of Rights on Divorce Act 1986 was constitutional valid by supreme court under duniyaa latif case so at this point correction is required.
41:23 Point of Correction MWA was not declared unconstitutional in Danial Latifi v. Union of India. "In Danial Latifi, the Supreme Court exercised greater restraint than in Shah Bano. It refused to strike down the MWA, yet protected the rights of divorced Muslim women through an astute use of interpretative tools. Keenly aware of the repercussions of the Shah Bano judgement, the court handled the case with ‘restraint and diplomacy’." A part from "10 judgments that changed India" by Zia Mody.
If you are looking for Judiciary online classes, Register for a free demo class now: bit.ly/3yrBVYs
You people are doing amazing job!!! By making law formulas, easy like mathematics awesome. Providing everything as per my requirements like chronologically. Made my job easy ! 😂❤️ Thank you! First for Rapid Revision Series and Now for these Judgement.
Please share ppt 🙏🏻
Absolutely amazing video ❤️❤️
Just when i thought rapid revision series was good,u. Guys have come up with something better.thank you so to the team🙏
you are welcome! :)
it's extremely updated and amazing video for every law students . thanks for your amazing effort for us
thank you!
Bahut achcha lga
14:48 Sir, Berubari is in West Bengal and not in Punjab. It was a disputed area between India and east-pakistan ( now Bangladesh). Please clarify
😊😊very helpful 😊😊
Thank you harsh sir 🥰🥰🥰
Glad you liked it! keep watching!
The HC case where the bench was largest, was it the Keshav Singh case?
Very Very Helpful... Great efforts..
Thank you Sir, Thank you Judiciary Gold 🙏🙏
thank you!
Great efforts , thanks a lot sir
you are welcome!
Thanks a lot sir for making learning easy and interesting
Muslim Women protection of Rights on Divorce Act 1986 was constitutional valid by supreme court under duniyaa latif case so at this point correction is required.
Thanku sir.
Glad you liked it! keep watching!
Thank you so much sir 🙏🙏
It's very very helpful
Glad you liked it! keep watching!
Congratulations 🙏 Thank you SIR
thank you!
This is amazing . To the point with proper information. Waiting for the rest
you are welcome! :)
Your Videos help in quick revision.. Thank You !
Thanks Sir
Excellent sir
Thankyou So much. 🙏🙏
Extremely useful
Very useful sir
Very helpful session. Thank you.
Thank you so much sir 🌻
41:23 Point of Correction
MWA was not declared unconstitutional in Danial Latifi v. Union of India.
"In Danial Latifi, the Supreme Court exercised greater restraint than in Shah Bano. It refused to
strike down the MWA, yet protected the rights of divorced Muslim women through an astute use of interpretative tools. Keenly aware of the repercussions of the Shah Bano judgement, the court handled the case with ‘restraint and diplomacy’."
A part from "10 judgments that changed India" by Zia Mody.
Best video in youtube
Sir please upload part2
thank you!
Very informative session Harsh Sir.... Really like this series
thank you!
Sir please bring part-2
Thank you so much🙏
thank you!
Awesome initiative 👍
It's superb
Waiting for part-2 of this video. Very helpful
Glad you liked it! keep watching!
Best wishes 🙏
Cases which reverse early case unko bhi sath me btana chahiye
Thnku so much sir for such a wonderful video
Glad you liked it! keep watching!
The video was amazing!
you are welcome! :)
This is brilliant! Pls bring part 2 soon :)
indeed ! thank you!
Sir, The Berubari case belongs to west Bengal not Punjab
What is "apan" culture among education faculties , simply say "humlog"
Sir, second part please.
Sir can u please tell in which bench seating 31 judges.
larger bench - keshav singh case
Can you tell me that Keshav Singh case happend in which year and how many judges bench set up in this case and of which high court??
How many are here for UPSI
How can I get the pdf of these case laws?
Anyone got to know in which case 30 judges bench was made?
Not 30 but 28. constitutionalrenaissance.in/keshav-singhs-case-i-a-pamphlet-which-led-to-a-constitutional-crisis/
Sir when the videos for other subjects will come ?
Iska lecture ka PDF sir mil jayaga
Part-2 kb aayega
Hi Sir
Hello sir