Wada does not think Sinner has doped, this is quite clear. Only appeals on the point he may have been negligent. A ban may be eliminated entirely from the picture as a result of No Fault or Negligence when an individual can establish that they did not know or suspect, or could not have reasonably known or suspected, even with the utmost caution that they had violated an anti-doping rule. The matter was adjudicated independently. ITIA took the matter to an independent tribunal that ruled the player is innocent, there is no fault or negligence, just gave him a sanction for objective responsibility eliminating the Indian Wells result. This is the first time in history WADA appeals the decision of an independent tribunal. Sinner is treated worse than 100% of sportsmen before him. In the past, WADA has only appealed federation and national anti-doping decisions and sanctions. Also, if there is fault or negligence sanction must include cancellation of all results according to anti-doping law, so Wada is contradictory. Negligence means knowing. WADA must prove Sinner knew - good luck to them - and also that he is the greatest idiot on Planet Earth, because the quantity is one billionth of a gram and he would have risked the destruction of his career for that. Objective responsibility is not negligence.
The experts found that PERFORMANCE WAS NOT ENHANCED!!! I originally thought the Doping Agencies had evolved in their view. WADA’s statement shows the process hasn’t evolved.
I’m sure. Simona Halep has been asking some questions.
Wada does not think Sinner has doped, this is quite clear. Only appeals on the point he may have been negligent.
A ban may be eliminated entirely from the picture as a result of No Fault or Negligence when an individual can establish that they did not know or suspect, or could not have reasonably known or suspected, even with the utmost caution that they had violated an anti-doping rule.
The matter was adjudicated independently. ITIA took the matter to an independent tribunal that ruled the player is innocent, there is no fault or negligence, just gave him a sanction for objective responsibility eliminating the Indian Wells result.
This is the first time in history WADA appeals the decision of an independent tribunal. Sinner is treated worse than 100% of sportsmen before him. In the past, WADA has only appealed federation and national anti-doping decisions and sanctions. Also, if there is fault or negligence sanction must include cancellation of all results according to anti-doping law, so Wada is contradictory.
Negligence means knowing. WADA must prove Sinner knew - good luck to them - and also that he is the greatest idiot on Planet Earth, because the quantity is one billionth of a gram and he would have risked the destruction of his career for that. Objective responsibility is not negligence.
I value the facts you have mentioned. Thank you.
Nonsense. He'll continue to steamroll his opponents
Ban him!
Yeah Then novak djokovic, carlos alcaraz, rafael nadal and Jack draper have big chances on all getting a slam next year
Hopefully he gets banned, other players banned for way less..
E altri non sono stati bannati per molto di più...se vuoi che venga sanzionato sei fan di alcaraz o di qualcuno più scarso
The experts found that PERFORMANCE WAS NOT ENHANCED!!! I originally thought the Doping Agencies had evolved in their view. WADA’s statement shows the process hasn’t evolved.