Interested in this with a better power supply but will likely wait for some reviews on its use. I don’t know if there’s any sonic downside to using it. Less noise as a pro yes, but is there a con to go along with it.
Love how you nonchalantly throw away the packaging 😂 But would have been hysterically funny if you did that with the iPurifier aswell Have you/somebody else, tested this vs the lan isilencer?
World is such an amazing and fascinatic place when you have zero understanding of how things work. Ethernet is already isolated, on both sides for that matter. This dumb box takes PHY, sends it to a transceiver, converts it to optical then to transceiver which again converts it to PHY.
@@TLPCHC > And it re-clocks the signal too. No, no it doesn't, and it doesn't even matter, clocking matters at the DAC. > I was extremely skeptical All that cash made your skepticism suddenly evaporate or something? > And I liked the improvement! Really? Did you do a proper blind test, or this is just make-believe?
@@VEC7ORlt I have listened with it in the system and not. No need for a blind test, as the difference was obvious. I am not selling a new religion, or invisible friends, it made a noticeable difference. I was a skeptic!
I am confused, you call your channel 'Listening Post', but I all I see are video's of unboxing...
Listening Post's UNBOXING CHANNEL
The HiFi retail store is called "The Listening Post"
Interested in this with a better power supply but will likely wait for some reviews on its use. I don’t know if there’s any sonic downside to using it. Less noise as a pro yes, but is there a con to go along with it.
No draw back at all. The re-clocking probably makes as much difference as the network isolation
so is it better to use this or just connect the streamer over wlan?
Cable is more stable than wireless. I run this between the wall outlet and the streamer and find it works better then wireless.
Love how you nonchalantly throw away the packaging 😂
But would have been hysterically funny if you did that with the iPurifier aswell
Have you/somebody else, tested this vs the lan isilencer?
Thanks for the feedback! the iSliencer is ok, the LAN iPurifier is way better
Should've thrown the unit too. All talk no action huh! Lol
I tend not to throw the items I am checking out
Faith allows you to believe in everything, evidence please, evidence
Did you try it?
Все эти устройства, позволяют снизить шум, от работы импульсных стабилизаторов, который проникает по интернет кабелям,не зависимо от пакета данных.
@@darkfiles2274 Sure
👍
World is such an amazing and fascinatic place when you have zero understanding of how things work.
Ethernet is already isolated, on both sides for that matter.
This dumb box takes PHY, sends it to a transceiver, converts it to optical then to transceiver which again converts it to PHY.
And it re-clocks the signal too. I was extremely skeptical, until I tried this for myself. It made a difference! And I liked the improvement!
@@TLPCHC
> And it re-clocks the signal too.
No, no it doesn't, and it doesn't even matter, clocking matters at the DAC.
> I was extremely skeptical
All that cash made your skepticism suddenly evaporate or something?
> And I liked the improvement!
Really? Did you do a proper blind test, or this is just make-believe?
@@VEC7ORlt Please borrow one and see
@@TLPCHC I'll borrow one when you'll do a blind test.
Which is never.
@@VEC7ORlt I have listened with it in the system and not. No need for a blind test, as the difference was obvious. I am not selling a new religion, or invisible friends, it made a noticeable difference. I was a skeptic!
Utter snake oil 😂
Nope. Try it