Hi Easter= Astarte queen of heaven fertility goddess! JESUS THE JEWISH LAMB OF GOD THAT TAKETH AWAY THE SINS OF THE WORLD FULFILLED YHWH’S PROPHETIC FEAST OF PASSOVER ON YHWH’S BIBLICAL LUNI SOLAR CALENDAR WHICH JESUS YESHUA IS FULFILLING WITH HIS RETURN TO REIGN OVER THE NATIONS FROM JERUSALEM ON THE SEVENTH AND LAST FEAST OF TABERNACLES FOR THE SEVENTH MILLENNIUM TO THE GLORY OF GOD THE FATHER!
I'm glad a friend show me the link to your videos, happy to see your solid research instead of playing traditions, may your work contribute to remove the God's Word's fogs from the enemy, especially in this time of Revelation.Thanks
@@eclipseeventsigns It's been years, but I'll forward his comments when I find them. Rest assured, if Dr. Missler had found and connected the dots, to the extent that you have done, I'm pretty sure he would have done a "teaching" on the topic. I only remember him alluding to there being a divine thread here that will be quite rewarding to those who devote themselves to delving into Scripture, because the seemingly extraneous details are always relevant. They're like spiritual breadcrumbs inviting you to follow down the path of rewarding discovery. (I'm very loosely paraphrasing from one of his leactures). I believe this type of study and meditation on His Word makes our King very pleased.
As a Catholic I grew up knowing he was Mary's uncle. And Jesus was both a King and Priest by ancestry. Nothing much new except city identification. Joseph of Arimathea could have traveled to England as a metals buyer.
That's very interesting. Those assertions were not based on any proof in the Catholic literature. The Catholics rely mainly on tradition. I have shown where there is evidence for these things which most have not recognized.
Dolores cannon exhaustively researched the crucifixion and resurrection evidence and the identity of Joseph of Arimathea, finding also proof of his visits to Britain, to buy tin for world trade, that metal being much used by the Romans to make bronze. As uncle to Jesus he asked Pilate for the body to place in his own tomb, which the Romans sealed and guarded. A very moving letter from Pilate was discovered in the Vatican records and details the meeting between Joseph and Pilate.
Well Done Sir! I think you might have solved it and it just seems to highlight a few things that always amaze me about the Bible: 1. There's still so much we don't know about the Bible. 2. There's a reason why the writers of the books include the details they do: They want us to know exactly what they're talking about. Of course, there's just no way they could know how much social drift and language development would occur over 2000 years. 3. What a blessing it is to discover a new revelation or even forgotten revelation left to us in the Bible. Thanks for putting in the work!
Thank you for searching out this matter. How well you deserve the wonderful experience of finding an answer to J of A's identity! And thank you for reading it yourself and not getting a computer to do it - so refreshing, a real human being!
Hey, I just wanted to say...I finished this and you pulled it off. Well done. Figured I commented earlier but turned out I had it wrong do should give credit as quick as I gave 'advice'....God bless
Good analysis. One thing you might know, but was not mentioned: the Israelites never mentioned a daughter as being "begotten" of. This term was only reserved for sons. Daughters were rarely mentioned in genealogies. Women were rather mentioned by referring to their head (or master) in the household. This could be their father (or adoptive father or kinsman redeemer) if they were under age. As soon as they got married, their husband would be their head of the household, and they would then be referred to by his headship. Great information and comprehensive. 🙂👍🏻
Mathew gives josephs perspective Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's.. Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
@@tasmarkou5681 You've got it exactly wrong. Matthew gives Mary's lineage from earliest to latest. If you don't include Mary in the genealogy, you have to accept that Matthew was wrong in his mention of the 3 X 14 generations. The Joseph mentioned is NOT her husband (her husband's father was Heli; while this Joseph's father was Jacob - the English translation misinterprets the original term "man", which denotes the head of the household, and since she was unmarried, her head would be her father or Kinsman Redeemer. Girls were also never mentioned as "begat of", but when mentioned were listed by referring to the head of their household. This is confirmed by ancient and original manuscripts.) Luke clearly states at the beginning of his genealogy that, "Jesus ... was regarded as the son of Joseph, the son of Heli", and lists the genealogy from latest to earliest. There is no question that this is Jesus's descent through his adoptive father Joseph - Mary's Husband. I'm not arguing about the fact that lineage can continue through a daughter, but that is the exception and has no relevance in this discussion. It does apply when speaking of Yeshua, the Son of God though.
Thank you that is astonishing ... and great research. " Kinsman Redeemer" is a glorious title, the title of Boaz, yes, but, even more of our Lord. Thank you so much!
your interpretation raises a serious question: On the cross Jesus gave his mother to John the beloved. Why then Joseph would not resume his duties towards Mary since he was Her guardian before she was bethrosed?
It's quite simple. Just as the narrative states, Jesus, while he was still alive took care of stating who her guardian should be. There was no question.
We don't know that the disciple was John, though he is the likely candidate. A less likely candidate would be James, Jesus' brother. Even if so, the question as to Joseph would remain. We do have tradition that Joseph took Mary out of Judea a few years later, so he ended up caring for her, if true.
Jesus is Joseph It's a Pen name How else would he know about Jesus struggling with Satan for forty days, or his crying in the Garden It's a literal literary device, the disciples are characters to create dialogue.
I agree that Joseph of Arimathea was the uncle of Mary, which would make him a brother of Mary's mother. I agree that Mary's mother was of the tribe of Levi, making Mary of the tribe of Judah on her father's side andthe tribe of Levi on her mother's, however, Zachariah and were in the hill country of Judah (Judea) not in the tribe of Benjamin. The hill country extend all the way to Hebron, which was a priestly city of the Kohathites, which is in the actual of the tribe of Judah not Benjamin. So it is a large area. It could be that Mary was born where you say but how did she get to Nazareth? Is that where her father and mother lived. Usually the kinsman redeemer was the brother of the husband. Perhaps though when Mary's father died there were no living relatives that could be a kinsman redeemer so perhaps Joseph of Arimathea helped. Kinsman redeemer does not necessarily mean a man must marry the widow, especially if se does have children by her husband but he would make sure that the family land could not be lost to someone outside of the tribe. However, in Mary's mother's case being of the tribe of Levite there would be no land inhertance. Her husband's relatives ( because they were of the tribe of Judah) any land would revert to if she had no sons. Although in some cases daughters could inherit the land if they married in her own tribe. It could have been a sticky situation seeing that Mary's parents were from 2 different tribes.
Joseph may have moved to Nazareth to find work in nearby Sepphoris, which required lots of construction labor. Skilled craftsmen move around to where big projects were located.
@Robert McLaurine More great research. It's so easy to just skip through "irrelevant" verses and scripture that doesn't reinforce one's untested beliefs. Very few dig in and do the work, even though it offers the greatest reward. I've always been fascinated by the places where people ask Jesus a question and He gives them an off the wall, "non-sensical" answer. These places in scripture are the hidden gold. Unfortunately, christianity's authorities always have a canned answer for everything even though they haven't stopped to dig into surface level contradictions and inconsistencies. The deeper answers are there waiting to be mined. I thank you for doing the work, and I know that after your last dozen videos that it is about your love of the truth. Your research has been very worthwhile and greatly benefits all who love the truth. [accidentally removed this comment]
We might all disagree, nonetheless we are told to search the scriptures diligently for ourselves in prayer and thanks giving. Bless you brother our found it food for thought.
No first century copies of the gospels exist in Aramaic. The earliest copies of the texts are in Greek. How do you conclude that differing words "man" and "husband" were used in the original Aramaic? It's still debated whether there even was an original Aramaic.
No first century copies of the gospels exist in Greek either. The different words are in the Aramaic text just as I showed. You can check it out for yourself. The Greek text uses the same word. This is evidence that the Aramaic was first - not Greek.
@@devindevonThe authors wrote in Hebrew. Most of them didn't even know Greek. The Greek translations vary in skill level by various translators. Luke wrote in Hebrew and pristine Greek. Matthew, Peter, James, Jude, and Paul wrote in Hebrew. There's plenty of evidence in the Peshitta and Greek texts, including typos and misreadings. One typo in the Old Syriac Peshitta's 2nd Timothy caused a translation error in ALL Greek mss. The NT even outright said Paul spoke Hebrew to the people. Josephus said Jews rarely learned Greek. He himself knew Greek but chose to write his books in Hebrew because it was easier.
'gbra' (Aramaic) means "mighty man" or "big man" - - and means pretty much what our contemporary "old man" does: depending on context, it can mean either father or husband. In this *highly* geneological context, it'd lean toward father. And the last block of 14 generations won't count correctly any other way. Don't ignore checksums - - they're there to help! However, one compelling item still in your favor is that we have 'begats' all the way Mt. 1 until we get to Joseph, who does not 'begat' Mary, but rather is this 'gbra'. Whether father or guardian, it is every bit as likely that Joseph had simply died by the time of Jesus' ministry, as many others infer. If he were still alive, why would Jesus turn to John on the cross and tell him to look after his mother? The eldest son providing for his widowed mother makes sense: doing that if he were still alive would not. Also note that other Scripture in the gospels covers reactions to Jesus' ministry by his mother and his brethren (including betimes that they though he'd gone off the rails) - but nothing about Joseph. Your making Mary's "Joseph" == the one of Arimathea always begs explaining how a carpenter got rich and because a prominent council member. Still chewing on Mary being of the tribe of Levi. I'd never considered that before. Many thanks for your input here!
Mary's parents were Anna and Joachim. Why not list them? Mary was a miracle birth in Anna's old age like Elizabeth and Zachariah's son John the Baptist in their old age.
Thank you so much!!! - Amazingly I was just wandering (mentally) near Ephrath yesterday while working on a translation from English to Chinese ("The Tribes of Israel" by Sister Gwen Shaw.) - Not to mention I always FELT there was something in Mary's genealogy that could be traced back to BOTH Judah and Levi!! God bless your Deep Dive! : )
Excellent, well articulated I have heard this before though I follow at least a couple of guys that use the Peshitta for clarifications and pretty sure they have revealed this detail
Thanks. Yes, the differences in the genealogies has been noticed before in the Peshitta. But, most people claim that the "Joseph" was Mary's father. My claim is the text does not agree with that but that it must have been Mary's guardian. And the further proofs that Joseph of Arimathea was that guardian is the unique claim coming from my research.
@@bluesky6985 There is NO evidence. Just because someone claims something doesn't mean it's true. I've looked into the supposed evidence and there is none.
Thanks for the interesting video. Two questions regarding this: 1. In Matthew 14 The disciples of John the Baptist take away his body, after Herod has killed him. Is this a different legal situation, since the execution was not done by the Romans, or why were they given the body? Is there evidence that one of John‘s disciples was his relative? 2. Is it not possible, that Joseph (adoptive father of Jesus) was both guardian of Mary and also became her husband? That would not rule out that Joseph of Arimathea was a relative of Mary and could claim Jesus‘ body as a relative. I find it somewhat implausible that the Joseph in the genealogy is not identified as Joseph of Arimethea / the person who would later help carry the cross, of this was the case.
Thanks. Second question first. As I point out in the video, the two different Josephs ARE in fact identified as being two different people. But not in the English translations from the Greek. One has to go to the Aramaic text where the different people ARE pointed out. As to John the Baptizer - I believe you did answer your own question. He was executed according to Jewish law and so the particular Roman law did not apply in that case.
@@gideon2060 Jesus paid Joseph of Arimatheas spiritual debt. Joseph of Arimathea didn't pay anything, he merely ask Pilate for and claimed Jesus's body because he was his kinman's Redeemer. That's just my humble opinion.
What I want to know is: If Mary the mother of Jesus Christ was born?/raised? in the hill country in the town of Ramah, how was she betrothed to Joseph of Nazareth? That was a significant distance between the two towns, and also I assume that any female descendant of Levi would not be given in marriage to just anyone. 🧐
Both Joseph and Mary were descendants of David. But additionally Mary was also a descendant of Aaron, on her mother's side. We do not know why she would have resettled to Nazareth where Joseph was also living.
Based on Jewish law, the kinsman redeemer is the direct guardian. That is the reason the book of Ruth is in the Old Testament - to show exactly how this concept works.
Mathew gives josephs perspective Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's.. Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
This geneology of Mary is exactly what I have come to conclude by reading the Arameic texts, that Mary is a descendant of Levi, and NOT David. The Mesianic Jews claim that Mary was a descendant of David when questioned about how Yeshua is a descendant of David if Joseph (who is a descendant of David) is not his father. So, if Mary is a Levite, then Yeshua HAS to be the biological son of Joseph to be a descendant of David, otherwise the prophecies were not fulfilled that he would come from the line of David. The Davidic line must be passed through the fathers line, not the mothers line.
In Luke 3:23-38 Mary's paternal side comes from the lineage of Judah to David. While traditionally her maternal side is from the lineage of Levi. So Jesus is a Royal Priest; He both King and Priest. Judah is the symbol of Kingship, while Levites are Priesthood
This is not true. Mary was of the line of David through her father. That is the whole point of the information Matthew lists. If the maternal side didn't matter as you claim, then they would not keep track of it. Yet, Elizabeth is stated to be of the line of Aaron. So, of course it mattered to them. And it does matter because this information implies that Mary was ALSO of the line of Aaron through her mother.
@@ElleCampbell-b3m Visit the vatican library. Thats where most of the records have been locked away "for safekeeping". They are available to look at. I went over them when I was a theology Ph.D. student studying biblical history. But if you search through the scriptures, the clues are also in there. It lists who her father was. and you can trace his lineage back.
Ruth is a key passage to the genealogy of our Messiah. There is nowhere that links the Davidic lineage except in the book of Ruth, so besides, possibly what you are saying regarding the book of Ruth being a type and foreshadow of Messiah, the actual lineage is a key reason, and if you asked me the central reason why the book of Ruth is included in the TNK.
Joseph Bar Matthias saw 3 friends on crosses. He asked Titus and received permission for them to be taken down and placed in his custody. 2 died and one lived.
@@eclipseeventsigns It was either "The Jewish War" or "The Antiquities" and it's not worth my time to re-read hundreds of pages just to try to convince someone who won't be convinced anyway. Whether you believe me or not, if you believe Jesus was God, sent by God into the world, you should learn about the world he was sent into. And Josephus offers the only detailed eye witness account of the events of 1st century Judea. If you believe in Jesus, you should read it for yourself.
@@tomhohl4373 Oh, I have read Josephus very closely. It's one of the main proofs that the New Testament was originally written in Aramaic and NOT Greek. And it's how I know that what you claim is NOT true. You said it wasTitus that gave permission. There was no one in power named Titus in Jerusalem during the crucifixion of Jesus.
Surely when Mary's lineage is taken through Matthews account, it goes through David and eventually Judah. Making Mary of the tribe of Judah. Joseph was also a son of David. Nehemiah Gordon has presented the aramiac translation as stated in the comment below, that the word used for husband of Mary gbra' (Aramaic) means "mighty man" or "big man" It can mean husband or father. If it is translated father then we have 14 generations.
Yes, there are others who have looked into this and state it should mean "father". But as I show in the video "father" is simply an impossible translation. It is "guardian" and has to do with the kinsman redeemer concept.
That's was true usually. But this was a special case because of the high holy day. As I stated, according to the Law, if there was a dead body that was not buried, the entire land would be unclean for the holy day. They HAD to deal with all the crucified bodies before sundown.
Pretty good detective work, but why is this lineage important. If you traced Mary’s lineage through David, it’s the same outcome - a compassionate & goodly people.
The lineage is important because as I try to explain, Messiah Jesus was both a descendant from David - the kingly lineage AND the line of Aaron - the priestly lineage. Both a king AND a priest.
@@eclipseeventsignsjesus Christ died on Passover, 14. Nisan, Friday, April 3, 33 ad at 3 pm. The last supper was held on Tuesday night on the Passover of the essenes. He was arrested the same night and presented to the mock court of the sadducees and the high priest annas. The trial before the sanhedrin was the day of Wednesday from the first tamid to the second tamid (9am to 3 pm) Cross examination before pilate was Thursday morning and audience before herod was Thursday afternoon. Crucified on Friday Passover of the jews. This chronology was not possible before the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls and deciphering the essene calendar
Actually, that's not accurate. The Jewish religious rulers had their temple guards. Pilate tells the rulers to make the tomb secure themselves - using their own guards. Not the Romans. Pilate did not want anything more to do with the matter.
This is really great! I will ask as important as joseph Arimathea was in the Bible A relative they need to let their dead rest. Its like someone writing on your dresses ancestors photos its disrespectful and need to 🛑 Be respectful of other people property .Do not write on personal photoa are were going have real problems. These are the things that the Lord him self spoke of wicked acts. And cause division ➗ And someone need to find out who is causing thins its not coming from us but someone is doing it.
Mary Father's name was Jochim her mothers name was Anne they worked in the temple they knew God they were unable to have children, So they prayed to God for a child. God blessed them with a child named Mary. You know the rest.Msry was never married to Joseph he already had a wife and children.Msry was always a virgin until she died. Jesus was her only child and she remained a virgin.😮 It was a GOD thing .
The rest you are right except that Joseph was a widow by the time he espoused Mary and could make her a wife. But he never touched her. His children would become Jesus' brothers who were all older than Him of course.
Mary's parents were Anna and Joachim who devoted their miracle first born in their old age to God and she was raised in the temple until she was 13 years old. Who then was espoused to the care of Joseph who was related by bloodline to them. Joseph was a widow with children who took her in being selected by God.
Expecting someone to believe that wholly unsubstantiated tale - is an Abuse of the Gift of Faith that GOD grants His followers for the purpose of believing His Word & the basic tenets of the clear doctrines of the NewCovenant - Not for believing miles & miles of pure speculation
Very good research! Only error is your German attributed name of God. You will not ever find the pronunciation you use in any ancient Hebrew bible. There are tons of evidence and actual “ANCIENT “ codex pronunciations of YEHOVAH. You would be wise to truly investigate from Hebrew sources to give correct honor to God’s glory by His name. Other than that, nice job!
Thanks. Not sure what you are referring to. But in any case, getting the pronunciation "right" is not that important. God is not being "conjured" based on how you say His name.
@@eclipseeventsigns Wow, I'm astounded at your response. Of course God's name is not like a genie in a bottle, but he makes it very clear that his name is very important to HIM, despite what we might think. He dedicated one of the ten commands to not make False Vows specifically USING HIS NAME. Yeshua also put it at the head of what we call the Lords's prayer "Hallowed, Sacred, Set-apart" is your name. In John 17 he declares making Father's name known to his decibels, and that he will CONTINUE to make it known. So important that God placed his holy unique name 6,827 times just in the Tanakh alone. Malachi 2:1-2
@@4robertbates There was nothing to be astounded by. I just don't agree with people making a huge issue of the EXACT pronounciation as if it is a magic spell. The main point is the power/person that is behind the "name". Not the mouth shapes that utter a particular set of sounds. Otherwise the word "Jesus" that has been used is totally meaningless. That was not the Messiah's actual name. It was Yeshuah.
Mathew gives josephs perspective Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's.. Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
Greetings my friend,,, listening to you on this Easter Sunday…
Hi
Easter= Astarte queen of heaven fertility goddess!
JESUS THE JEWISH LAMB OF GOD THAT TAKETH AWAY THE SINS OF THE WORLD
FULFILLED YHWH’S PROPHETIC FEAST OF PASSOVER ON YHWH’S BIBLICAL LUNI SOLAR CALENDAR WHICH JESUS YESHUA IS FULFILLING WITH HIS RETURN TO REIGN OVER THE NATIONS FROM JERUSALEM ON THE SEVENTH AND LAST FEAST OF TABERNACLES FOR THE SEVENTH MILLENNIUM TO THE GLORY OF GOD THE FATHER!
I'm glad a friend show me the link to your videos, happy to see your solid research instead of playing traditions, may your work contribute to remove the God's Word's fogs from the enemy, especially in this time of Revelation.Thanks
Outstanding!! The late Dr. Chuck Missler pulled on this same thread... Well done!!
Very nice. I haven't come across that. Do you have a link? Just know that yt doesn't allow actual links so you'll have to separate the [periods]
@@eclipseeventsigns It's been years, but I'll forward his comments when I find them. Rest assured, if Dr. Missler had found and connected the dots, to the extent that you have done, I'm pretty sure he would have done a "teaching" on the topic. I only remember him alluding to there being a divine thread here that will be quite rewarding to those who devote themselves to delving into Scripture, because the seemingly extraneous details are always relevant. They're like spiritual breadcrumbs inviting you to follow down the path of rewarding discovery. (I'm very loosely paraphrasing from one of his leactures). I believe this type of study and meditation on His Word makes our King very pleased.
Roy from gnostic books... he was not related to Mary.
@eclipseeventsigns You'd have to do a specific search at Konioa House where his library of videos are.
As a Catholic I grew up knowing he was Mary's uncle. And Jesus was both a King and Priest by ancestry. Nothing much new except city identification. Joseph of Arimathea could have traveled to England as a metals buyer.
That's very interesting. Those assertions were not based on any proof in the Catholic literature. The Catholics rely mainly on tradition. I have shown where there is evidence for these things which most have not recognized.
@eclipseeventsigns maybe some of the traditions have a factual basis. Thanks.
@@luvpamelanewton No, he was most definitely not.
Joseph Mary's husband is related to Mary by bloodline a distant cousin.
Dolores cannon exhaustively researched the crucifixion and resurrection evidence and the identity of Joseph of Arimathea, finding also proof of his visits to Britain, to buy tin for world trade, that metal being much used by the Romans to make bronze. As uncle to Jesus he asked Pilate for the body to place in his own tomb, which the Romans sealed and guarded. A very moving letter from Pilate was discovered in the Vatican records and details the meeting between Joseph and Pilate.
Well Done Sir! I think you might have solved it and it just seems to highlight a few things that always amaze me about the Bible: 1. There's still so much we don't know about the Bible. 2. There's a reason why the writers of the books include the details they do: They want us to know exactly what they're talking about. Of course, there's just no way they could know how much social drift and language development would occur over 2000 years. 3. What a blessing it is to discover a new revelation or even forgotten revelation left to us in the Bible. Thanks for putting in the work!
Awesome teaching!!!!
Thank you for searching out this matter. How well you deserve the wonderful experience of finding an answer to J of A's identity! And thank you for reading it yourself and not getting a computer to do it - so refreshing, a real human being!
" AMEN IN OUR ONLY LORD THE RESURRECTED JESUS CHRIST NAME AMEN. "
Hey, I just wanted to say...I finished this and you pulled it off. Well done. Figured I commented earlier but turned out I had it wrong do should give credit as quick as I gave 'advice'....God bless
Wow, what an exhaustive study of Joseph of Arimathea
Very insightful research. Well done.
Thanks.
Good analysis. One thing you might know, but was not mentioned: the Israelites never mentioned a daughter as being "begotten" of. This term was only reserved for sons. Daughters were rarely mentioned in genealogies. Women were rather mentioned by referring to their head (or master) in the household. This could be their father (or adoptive father or kinsman redeemer) if they were under age. As soon as they got married, their husband would be their head of the household, and they would then be referred to by his headship. Great information and comprehensive. 🙂👍🏻
Mathew gives josephs perspective
Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's..
Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law
Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
@@tasmarkou5681 You've got it exactly wrong. Matthew gives Mary's lineage from earliest to latest. If you don't include Mary in the genealogy, you have to accept that Matthew was wrong in his mention of the 3 X 14 generations. The Joseph mentioned is NOT her husband (her husband's father was Heli; while this Joseph's father was Jacob - the English translation misinterprets the original term "man", which denotes the head of the household, and since she was unmarried, her head would be her father or Kinsman Redeemer. Girls were also never mentioned as "begat of", but when mentioned were listed by referring to the head of their household. This is confirmed by ancient and original manuscripts.) Luke clearly states at the beginning of his genealogy that, "Jesus ... was regarded as the son of Joseph, the son of Heli", and lists the genealogy from latest to earliest. There is no question that this is Jesus's descent through his adoptive father Joseph - Mary's Husband.
I'm not arguing about the fact that lineage can continue through a daughter, but that is the exception and has no relevance in this discussion. It does apply when speaking of Yeshua, the Son of God though.
@@deniss2 well that's what I was clarifying
@@tasmarkou5681 but you have it the wrong way round....
@@tasmarkou5681Matthew is Mary's lineage.
Thank you that is astonishing ... and great research. " Kinsman Redeemer" is a glorious title, the title of Boaz, yes, but, even more of our Lord. Thank you so much!
This need to be spread among all the christian’s platforms.
Thank you. I agree.
@@eclipseeventsigns kindly post or send link for your teaching on rapture
your interpretation raises a serious question: On the cross Jesus gave his mother to John the beloved. Why then Joseph would not resume his duties towards Mary since he was Her guardian before she was bethrosed?
It's quite simple. Just as the narrative states, Jesus, while he was still alive took care of stating who her guardian should be. There was no question.
We don't know that the disciple was John, though he is the likely candidate. A less likely candidate would be James, Jesus' brother. Even if so, the question as to Joseph would remain. We do have tradition that Joseph took Mary out of Judea a few years later, so he ended up caring for her, if true.
I always believed that Joseph of aremethea was an uncle to Mary mother of Jesus
Where did you get that idea ?
I was also told that too
Believers begin their crimes like Moses, becoming history's worst navigator, as if travel were best done with one foot in fantasyland.
Wasn’t he Yahusha’s grandfather?
Jesus is Joseph
It's a Pen name
How else would he know about Jesus struggling with Satan for forty days, or his crying in the Garden
It's a literal literary device, the disciples are characters to create dialogue.
Well done for this research
Excellent work.
Some very fine detective work, my friend!
Thank you for doing diligent research. a blessing for all the rest of us . Thank you. Very helpful
This was an excellent presentation. I often thought Mary's lineage would have been from Levi..
Very well done
I agree that Joseph of Arimathea was the uncle of Mary, which would make him a brother of Mary's mother. I agree that Mary's mother was of the tribe of Levi, making Mary of the tribe of Judah on her father's side andthe tribe of Levi on her mother's, however, Zachariah and were in the hill country of Judah (Judea) not in the tribe of Benjamin. The hill country extend all the way to Hebron, which was a priestly city of the Kohathites, which is in the actual of the tribe of Judah not Benjamin. So it is a large area. It could be that Mary was born where you say but how did she get to Nazareth? Is that where her father and mother lived. Usually the kinsman redeemer was the brother of the husband. Perhaps though when Mary's father died there were no living relatives that could be a kinsman redeemer so perhaps Joseph of Arimathea helped. Kinsman redeemer does not necessarily mean a man must marry the widow, especially if se does have children by her husband but he would make sure that the family land could not be lost to someone outside of the tribe. However, in Mary's mother's case being of the tribe of Levite there would be no land inhertance. Her husband's relatives ( because they were of the tribe of Judah) any land would revert to if she had no sons. Although in some cases daughters could inherit the land if they married in her own tribe. It could have been a sticky situation seeing that Mary's parents were from 2 different tribes.
Joseph may have moved to Nazareth to find work in nearby Sepphoris, which required lots of construction labor. Skilled craftsmen move around to where big projects were located.
Elizabeth had two parents. Maybe her mother was from the tribe of Judah and that's how she was related to Mary.
@@gideon2060under the law to be a Levitical preast, you must be married to a daughter of Levi
@@gideon2060koine word "tekton" = craftsman or similar -- "stonemason" could be meant, not "carpenter"
@joekaufman5620 Is the tribe based on the man?
@Robert McLaurine
More great research. It's so easy to just skip through "irrelevant" verses and scripture that doesn't reinforce one's untested beliefs. Very few dig in and do the work, even though it offers the greatest reward. I've always been fascinated by the places where people ask Jesus a question and He gives them an off the wall, "non-sensical" answer. These places in scripture are the hidden gold. Unfortunately, christianity's authorities always have a canned answer for everything even though they haven't stopped to dig into surface level contradictions and inconsistencies. The deeper answers are there waiting to be mined. I thank you for doing the work, and I know that after your last dozen videos that it is about your love of the truth. Your research has been very worthwhile and greatly benefits all who love the truth.
[accidentally removed this comment]
Wow! Awesome exposition! Thank you Sir.
Excellent
Nice 👍
We might all disagree, nonetheless we are told to search the scriptures diligently for ourselves in prayer and thanks giving. Bless you brother our found it food for thought.
The clothes of the blessed Lord were expensive. They where cast lots for
Good research. Well done.
Before even watching, he was the uncle, a tradesman!🤠
How miraculous that you know something without bothering to either learn or verify! Too bad you'll never know how ignorant you are by this means.
@@gregrice1354
I’m well researched in the theology of this subject 👍🙏🏻🤠 You do some!
The story of Esther! God bless you! Shalom!🙏👑🌹
Very informative talk, u know ur stuff!
I appreciate that!
Praise be JESUS CHRIST NAZARENE ALMIGHTY!❤️😇🌷🙏🏻
Brilliant.
The course of Abia tells you when Jesus was conceived and born
sept, 29
@@SteveBurke03181962 Yep
No first century copies of the gospels exist in Aramaic. The earliest copies of the texts are in Greek. How do you conclude that differing words "man" and "husband" were used in the original Aramaic? It's still debated whether there even was an original Aramaic.
No first century copies of the gospels exist in Greek either. The different words are in the Aramaic text just as I showed. You can check it out for yourself. The Greek text uses the same word. This is evidence that the Aramaic was first - not Greek.
@@eclipseeventsigns The gospel authors wrote in Greek. Any Aramaic text is derived from the Greek.
@@devindevon There is no actual proof for your statement. There is evidence that it was Greek translated from Aramaic.
We know there was a first century Peshitta.
@@devindevonThe authors wrote in Hebrew. Most of them didn't even know Greek. The Greek translations vary in skill level by various translators. Luke wrote in Hebrew and pristine Greek. Matthew, Peter, James, Jude, and Paul wrote in Hebrew. There's plenty of evidence in the Peshitta and Greek texts, including typos and misreadings. One typo in the Old Syriac Peshitta's 2nd Timothy caused a translation error in ALL Greek mss. The NT even outright said Paul spoke Hebrew to the people. Josephus said Jews rarely learned Greek. He himself knew Greek but chose to write his books in Hebrew because it was easier.
My doubt about last set geneolgy is cleared. Thank you.
'gbra' (Aramaic) means "mighty man" or "big man" - - and means pretty much what our contemporary "old man" does: depending on context, it can mean either father or husband. In this *highly* geneological context, it'd lean toward father. And the last block of 14 generations won't count correctly any other way. Don't ignore checksums - - they're there to help! However, one compelling item still in your favor is that we have 'begats' all the way Mt. 1 until we get to Joseph, who does not 'begat' Mary, but rather is this 'gbra'.
Whether father or guardian, it is every bit as likely that Joseph had simply died by the time of Jesus' ministry, as many others infer. If he were still alive, why would Jesus turn to John on the cross and tell him to look after his mother? The eldest son providing for his widowed mother makes sense: doing that if he were still alive would not. Also note that other Scripture in the gospels covers reactions to Jesus' ministry by his mother and his brethren (including betimes that they though he'd gone off the rails) - but nothing about Joseph.
Your making Mary's "Joseph" == the one of Arimathea always begs explaining how a carpenter got rich and because a prominent council member.
Still chewing on Mary being of the tribe of Levi. I'd never considered that before. Many thanks for your input here!
As I explain it is all about how the Aramaic word is used IN CONTEXT. It can NOT mean father.
Mary's parents were Anna and Joachim. Why not list them? Mary was a miracle birth in Anna's old age like Elizabeth and Zachariah's son John the Baptist in their old age.
@@luvpamelanewton That's just a falsehood. It's not true at all.
Thank you so much!!! - Amazingly I was just wandering (mentally) near Ephrath yesterday while working on a translation from English to Chinese ("The Tribes of Israel" by Sister Gwen Shaw.) - Not to mention I always FELT there was something in Mary's genealogy that could be traced back to BOTH Judah and Levi!! God bless your Deep Dive! : )
Excellent, well articulated
I have heard this before though
I follow at least a couple of guys that use the Peshitta for clarifications and pretty sure they have revealed this detail
Thanks. Yes, the differences in the genealogies has been noticed before in the Peshitta. But, most people claim that the "Joseph" was Mary's father. My claim is the text does not agree with that but that it must have been Mary's guardian. And the further proofs that Joseph of Arimathea was that guardian is the unique claim coming from my research.
U have done great Job!
Levi carry ARK OF COVENANT.
Aramaetia Joseph carried BREAD OF HEAVEN - still as Levi.
Yeshua has blessed you.
Joseph was a tin miner in Glastonbury England 😊
There is no Biblical evidence for that. Neither is there any historical documentation for that. It's just a legend.
@@eclipseeventsigns Yes there is. E Raymond Capt has a documentary on it called Traditions of Glastonbury where Joseph is buried
@@bluesky6985 There is NO evidence. Just because someone claims something doesn't mean it's true. I've looked into the supposed evidence and there is none.
@@eclipseeventsigns The Glastonbury thorn.
@@bluesky6985 Tradition, legend and fanciful thinking. There is no biblical evidence. None whatsoever.
Thanks for the interesting video. Two questions regarding this: 1. In Matthew 14 The disciples of John the Baptist take away his body, after Herod has killed him. Is this a different legal situation, since the execution was not done by the Romans, or why were they given the body? Is there evidence that one of John‘s disciples was his relative? 2. Is it not possible, that Joseph (adoptive father of Jesus) was both guardian of Mary and also became her husband? That would not rule out that Joseph of Arimathea was a relative of Mary and could claim Jesus‘ body as a relative. I find it somewhat implausible that the Joseph in the genealogy is not identified as Joseph of Arimethea / the person who would later help carry the cross, of this was the case.
Thanks. Second question first. As I point out in the video, the two different Josephs ARE in fact identified as being two different people. But not in the English translations from the Greek. One has to go to the Aramaic text where the different people ARE pointed out.
As to John the Baptizer - I believe you did answer your own question. He was executed according to Jewish law and so the particular Roman law did not apply in that case.
Have you read the book "Whence came they."
No. But I've done research into the topic. It does not hold water historically or with convincing evidence.
What are your credentials please? Thank you.
Ask the Author of the book?
What is the book about? I can't find it anywhere. I've done a lot of research on Joseph of Arimathea. Just curious. :)
Thank you. I really appreciate this your study. ❤❤❤ Yosef in the Chosen tv series.
He was Jesus's kinsman-redeemer! Had to be related!
You have it backwards. Jesus paid his debts.
@@gideon2060 Jesus paid Joseph of Arimatheas spiritual
debt. Joseph of Arimathea didn't pay anything, he merely ask Pilate for and claimed Jesus's body because he was his kinman's Redeemer.
That's just my humble opinion.
What I want to know is: If Mary the mother of Jesus Christ was born?/raised? in the hill country in the town of Ramah, how was she betrothed to Joseph of Nazareth? That was a significant distance between the two towns, and also I assume that any female descendant of Levi would not be given in marriage to just anyone. 🧐
Both Joseph and Mary were descendants of David. But additionally Mary was also a descendant of Aaron, on her mother's side. We do not know why she would have resettled to Nazareth where Joseph was also living.
Mary was dedicated to the temple as a miracle first born and raised in the temple being conceived in Anna's and Joachim's old age.
@@luvpamelanewton LOL. That is such a made up falsehood. Thanks for the laugh.
If Joseph of Arimathea was Mary's uncle, how does that qualify him to be in Jesus' lineage through Mary?
Based on Jewish law, the kinsman redeemer is the direct guardian. That is the reason the book of Ruth is in the Old Testament - to show exactly how this concept works.
@@eclipseeventsignslinage is through the paternal side only
@@commentseditedMary's father is Jesus' paternal line.
Sir the Holy Spirit has born witness to me of the correct ✅ interpretation of your results…. Thank s be t God for the witnesses of the Holy Spirit
Mathew gives josephs perspective
Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's..
Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law
Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
Your statements are absolutely not true. Luke's gospel specifically states that it is Joseph's genealogy. Matthew is from Mary's.
This geneology of Mary is exactly what I have come to conclude by reading the Arameic texts, that Mary is a descendant of Levi, and NOT David. The Mesianic Jews claim that Mary was a descendant of David when questioned about how Yeshua is a descendant of David if Joseph (who is a descendant of David) is not his father.
So, if Mary is a Levite, then Yeshua HAS to be the biological son of Joseph to be a descendant of David, otherwise the prophecies were not fulfilled that he would come from the line of David. The Davidic line must be passed through the fathers line, not the mothers line.
God s Great, remember.
In Luke 3:23-38 Mary's paternal side comes from the lineage of Judah to David. While traditionally her maternal side is from the lineage of Levi. So Jesus is a Royal Priest; He both King and Priest. Judah is the symbol of Kingship, while Levites are Priesthood
@@WH6FQE where is the evidence that Mary was a Levite?
This is not true. Mary was of the line of David through her father. That is the whole point of the information Matthew lists. If the maternal side didn't matter as you claim, then they would not keep track of it. Yet, Elizabeth is stated to be of the line of Aaron. So, of course it mattered to them. And it does matter because this information implies that Mary was ALSO of the line of Aaron through her mother.
@@ElleCampbell-b3m Visit the vatican library. Thats where most of the records have been locked away "for safekeeping". They are available to look at. I went over them when I was a theology Ph.D. student studying biblical history.
But if you search through the scriptures, the clues are also in there. It lists who her father was. and you can trace his lineage back.
Interesting hypothesis.
Ruth is a key passage to the genealogy of our Messiah. There is nowhere that links the Davidic lineage except in the book of Ruth, so besides, possibly what you are saying regarding the book of Ruth being a type and foreshadow of Messiah, the actual lineage is a key reason, and if you asked me the central reason why the book of Ruth is included in the TNK.
This is such a mic drop 🤯
I was thinking that jesus was the nephew of Joseph. He must have been a Levi same as Mary Jesus mother
All three were of Judah. Mary's mother was of Levi.
Joseph Bar Matthias saw 3 friends on crosses. He asked Titus and received permission for them to be taken down and placed in his custody. 2 died and one lived.
What does that even mean? Where is there proof for what you are claiming?
@@eclipseeventsigns Joseph Bar Matthias is better known as Josephus. It's in one of his 2 books.
@@tomhohl4373 Again. Proof? What books?
@@eclipseeventsigns It was either "The Jewish War" or "The Antiquities" and it's not worth my time to re-read hundreds of pages just to try to convince someone who won't be convinced anyway. Whether you believe me or not, if you believe Jesus was God, sent by God into the world, you should learn about the world he was sent into. And Josephus offers the only detailed eye witness account of the events of 1st century Judea. If you believe in Jesus, you should read it for yourself.
@@tomhohl4373 Oh, I have read Josephus very closely. It's one of the main proofs that the New Testament was originally written in Aramaic and NOT Greek. And it's how I know that what you claim is NOT true. You said it wasTitus that gave permission. There was no one in power named Titus in Jerusalem during the crucifixion of Jesus.
Surely when Mary's lineage is taken through Matthews account, it goes through David and eventually Judah. Making Mary of the tribe of Judah. Joseph was also a son of David.
Nehemiah Gordon has presented the aramiac translation as stated in the comment below, that the word used for husband of Mary gbra' (Aramaic) means "mighty man" or "big man"
It can mean husband or father. If it is translated father then we have 14 generations.
Yes, there are others who have looked into this and state it should mean "father". But as I show in the video "father" is simply an impossible translation. It is "guardian" and has to do with the kinsman redeemer concept.
Who was Jochim and Anne believed to be the parents of Mary grandparents of Jesus 🙏
But the crucified bodies were thrown into the garbage pit and the crucified were left to hang along the road to Judea for days, so I thought.
That's was true usually. But this was a special case because of the high holy day. As I stated, according to the Law, if there was a dead body that was not buried, the entire land would be unclean for the holy day. They HAD to deal with all the crucified bodies before sundown.
@eclipseeventsigns interesting fact I never thought about that.
So relatives would always have to be there to bury the bodies.
Pretty good detective work, but why is this lineage important. If you traced Mary’s lineage through David, it’s the same outcome - a compassionate & goodly people.
The lineage is important because as I try to explain, Messiah Jesus was both a descendant from David - the kingly lineage AND the line of Aaron - the priestly lineage. Both a king AND a priest.
The lineage is extremely important to ANY Jew, because it involves inheritance of land.
@eclipseeventsigns why didn't you say that in your work!!!
@@johnnolan2557 I did!!!
he was wealthy...he may have known Pilate...he exposed himself by retrieving the body...
But according to established Roman law, he did not have any right to claim the body - unless he was related to the deceased.
👍👍
Passover was on a Wednesday when Jesus was crucified 😊
Yes, it was. I have 2 videos with a lot of evidence for that.
@@eclipseeventsigns I have the companion Bible
@@eclipseeventsignsjesus Christ died on Passover, 14. Nisan, Friday, April 3, 33 ad at 3 pm.
The last supper was held on Tuesday night on the Passover of the essenes. He was arrested the same night and presented to the mock court of the sadducees and the high priest annas. The trial before the sanhedrin was the day of Wednesday from the first tamid to the second tamid (9am to 3 pm)
Cross examination before pilate was Thursday morning and audience before herod was Thursday afternoon. Crucified on Friday Passover of the jews.
This chronology was not possible before the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls and deciphering the essene calendar
@@jperez7893 The things you state are just not possible. See my other videos with plenty of proofs which show why what you state is impossible.
@@eclipseeventsigns sorry. The blood moon eclipse of 3april 33 ad fits all conditions as the day of crucifixion on a Friday
The guards were Roman not Jewish. Baruch HaShem & Shalom Shalom Israel! 🙏🇮🇱🇺🇸🙏
Actually, that's not accurate. The Jewish religious rulers had their temple guards. Pilate tells the rulers to make the tomb secure themselves - using their own guards. Not the Romans. Pilate did not want anything more to do with the matter.
AMAZING BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP!
Thank you for that. A lot of people don't recognize that especially if it goes against their preconceived notions.
This is really great! I will ask as important as joseph Arimathea was in the Bible A relative they need to let their dead rest. Its like someone writing on your dresses ancestors photos its disrespectful and need to 🛑 Be respectful of other people property .Do not write on personal photoa are were going have real problems. These are the things that the Lord him self spoke of wicked acts. And cause division ➗ And someone need to find out who is causing thins its not coming from us but someone is doing it.
Mary Father's name was Jochim her mothers name was Anne they worked in the temple they knew God they were unable to have children, So they prayed to God for a child. God blessed them with a child named Mary. You know the rest.Msry was never married to Joseph he already had a wife and children.Msry was always a virgin until she died. Jesus was her only child and she remained a virgin.😮 It was a GOD thing .
That's simply not true or accurate. Give historical documents to prove any of what you claim.
Joseph's first wife died and he became a widow.
The rest you are right except that Joseph was a widow by the time he espoused Mary and could make her a wife. But he never touched her. His children would become Jesus' brothers who were all older than Him of course.
Mary's parents were Anna and Joachim who devoted their miracle first born in their old age to God and she was raised in the temple until she was 13 years old. Who then was espoused to the care of Joseph who was related by bloodline to them. Joseph was a widow with children who took her in being selected by God.
Expecting someone to believe that wholly unsubstantiated tale - is an Abuse of the Gift of Faith that GOD grants His followers for the purpose of believing His Word & the basic tenets of the clear doctrines of the NewCovenant - Not for believing miles & miles of pure speculation
The Lord is great the spirit is great
Arimathea = Ramathaim. 1Sam 1:1
Yes. As I point out in the presentation.
Very good research! Only error is your German attributed name of God. You will not ever find the pronunciation you use in any ancient Hebrew bible. There are tons of evidence and actual “ANCIENT “ codex pronunciations of YEHOVAH. You would be wise to truly investigate from Hebrew sources to give correct honor to God’s glory by His name. Other than that, nice job!
Thanks. Not sure what you are referring to. But in any case, getting the pronunciation "right" is not that important. God is not being "conjured" based on how you say His name.
@@eclipseeventsigns Wow, I'm astounded at your response. Of course God's name is not like a genie in a bottle, but he makes it very clear that his name is very important to HIM, despite what we might think. He dedicated one of the ten commands to not make False Vows specifically USING HIS NAME. Yeshua also put it at the head of what we call the Lords's prayer "Hallowed, Sacred, Set-apart" is your name. In John 17 he declares making Father's name known to his decibels, and that he will CONTINUE to make it known. So important that God placed his holy unique name 6,827 times just in the Tanakh alone. Malachi 2:1-2
@@4robertbates There was nothing to be astounded by. I just don't agree with people making a huge issue of the EXACT pronounciation as if it is a magic spell. The main point is the power/person that is behind the "name". Not the mouth shapes that utter a particular set of sounds.
Otherwise the word "Jesus" that has been used is totally meaningless. That was not the Messiah's actual name. It was Yeshuah.
Mathew gives josephs perspective
Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's..
Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law
Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
False teaching. "Yehovah" is a gnostic Kabbalah name. Also, the V is German. Remove the plank.
WHO CARES
Sorry you feel that way. Many people do. God has hidden these gems in His Word for us to find and be in awe about His work through history.
Great job
Thank you.