Solved! Who Was Joseph Of Arimathea? How he was related to Jesus.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 авг 2023
- Just who was Joseph of Arimathea? All four of the Gospel writers include him in their narrative describing the crucifixion of Messiah Jesus. He’s there for a couple of verses and then just as quickly he disappears from the story.
• We will discover exactly why this individual could suddenly appear and be given possession of the corpse of Jesus to do with it as he pleased.
• We will investigate the location of Arimathea - a city, some experts say, is supposedly lost to history.
• We will solve one of the biggest mysteries of the New Testament - the supposed corruption of the genealogy found in Matthew.
• And how do the assigned jobs for the Levitical priests described in the Old Testament lead us to uncover a reveal about Mary, the mother of Jesus - something no one has yet recognized in modern Church history.
I always believed that Joseph of aremethea was an uncle to Mary mother of Jesus
Where did you get that idea ?
I was also told that too
Believers begin their crimes like Moses, becoming history's worst navigator, as if travel were best done with one foot in fantasyland.
Wow, what an exhaustive study of Joseph of Arimathea
I'm glad a friend show me the link to your videos, happy to see your solid research instead of playing traditions, may your work contribute to remove the God's Word's fogs from the enemy, especially in this time of Revelation.Thanks
Well Done Sir! I think you might have solved it and it just seems to highlight a few things that always amaze me about the Bible: 1. There's still so much we don't know about the Bible. 2. There's a reason why the writers of the books include the details they do: They want us to know exactly what they're talking about. Of course, there's just no way they could know how much social drift and language development would occur over 2000 years. 3. What a blessing it is to discover a new revelation or even forgotten revelation left to us in the Bible. Thanks for putting in the work!
Outstanding!! The late Dr. Chuck Missler pulled on this same thread... Well done!!
Very nice. I haven't come across that. Do you have a link? Just know that yt doesn't allow actual links so you'll have to separate the [periods]
@@eclipseeventsigns It's been years, but I'll forward his comments when I find them. Rest assured, if Dr. Missler had found and connected the dots, to the extent that you have done, I'm pretty sure he would have done a "teaching" on the topic. I only remember him alluding to there being a divine thread here that will be quite rewarding to those who devote themselves to delving into Scripture, because the seemingly extraneous details are always relevant. They're like spiritual breadcrumbs inviting you to follow down the path of rewarding discovery. (I'm very loosely paraphrasing from one of his leactures). I believe this type of study and meditation on His Word makes our King very pleased.
Greetings my friend,,, listening to you on this Easter Sunday…
Hi
Easter= Astarte queen of heaven fertility goddess!
JESUS THE JEWISH LAMB OF GOD THAT TAKETH AWAY THE SINS OF THE WORLD
FULFILLED YHWH’S PROPHETIC FEAST OF PASSOVER ON YHWH’S BIBLICAL LUNI SOLAR CALENDAR WHICH JESUS YESHUA IS FULFILLING WITH HIS RETURN TO REIGN OVER THE NATIONS FROM JERUSALEM ON THE SEVENTH AND LAST FEAST OF TABERNACLES FOR THE SEVENTH MILLENNIUM TO THE GLORY OF GOD THE FATHER!
Excellent work.
Good analysis. One thing you might know, but was not mentioned: the Israelites never mentioned a daughter as being "begotten" of. This term was only reserved for sons. Daughters were rarely mentioned in genealogies. Women were rather mentioned by referring to their head (or master) in the household. This could be their father (or adoptive father or kinsman redeemer) if they were under age. As soon as they got married, their husband would be their head of the household, and they would then be referred to by his headship. Great information and comprehensive. 🙂👍🏻
Mathew gives josephs perspective
Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's..
Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law
Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
@@tasmarkou5681 You've got it exactly wrong. Matthew gives Mary's lineage from earliest to latest. If you don't include Mary in the genealogy, you have to accept that Matthew was wrong in his mention of the 3 X 14 generations. The Joseph mentioned is NOT her husband (her husband's father was Heli; while this Joseph's father was Jacob - the English translation misinterprets the original term "man", which denotes the head of the household, and since she was unmarried, her head would be her father or Kinsman Redeemer. Girls were also never mentioned as "begat of", but when mentioned were listed by referring to the head of their household. This is confirmed by ancient and original manuscripts.) Luke clearly states at the beginning of his genealogy that, "Jesus ... was regarded as the son of Joseph, the son of Heli", and lists the genealogy from latest to earliest. There is no question that this is Jesus's descent through his adoptive father Joseph - Mary's Husband.
I'm not arguing about the fact that lineage can continue through a daughter, but that is the exception and has no relevance in this discussion. It does apply when speaking of Yeshua, the Son of God though.
@@deniss2 well that's what I was clarifying
@@tasmarkou5681 but you have it the wrong way round....
Awesome teaching!!!!
Very insightful research. Well done.
Thanks.
" AMEN IN OUR ONLY LORD THE RESURRECTED JESUS CHRIST NAME AMEN. "
Thank you that is astonishing ... and great research. " Kinsman Redeemer" is a glorious title, the title of Boaz, yes, but, even more of our Lord. Thank you so much!
@Robert McLaurine
More great research. It's so easy to just skip through "irrelevant" verses and scripture that doesn't reinforce one's untested beliefs. Very few dig in and do the work, even though it offers the greatest reward. I've always been fascinated by the places where people ask Jesus a question and He gives them an off the wall, "non-sensical" answer. These places in scripture are the hidden gold. Unfortunately, christianity's authorities always have a canned answer for everything even though they haven't stopped to dig into surface level contradictions and inconsistencies. The deeper answers are there waiting to be mined. I thank you for doing the work, and I know that after your last dozen videos that it is about your love of the truth. Your research has been very worthwhile and greatly benefits all who love the truth.
[accidentally removed this comment]
As a Catholic I grew up knowing he was Mary's uncle. And Jesus was both a King and Priest by ancestry. Nothing much new except city identification. Joseph of Arimathea could have traveled to England as a metals buyer.
That's very interesting. Those assertions were not based on any proof in the Catholic literature. The Catholics rely mainly on tradition. I have shown where there is evidence for these things which most have not recognized.
Very informative talk, u know ur stuff!
I appreciate that!
We might all disagree, nonetheless we are told to search the scriptures diligently for ourselves in prayer and thanks giving. Bless you brother our found it food for thought.
The story of Esther! God bless you! Shalom!🙏👑🌹
Finally the truth about who the old man was who requested Christ's body. It seems he would not be given Christ's body if not a Jewish relative.. I once found a genealogy chart for Christ, it listed Joseph of Aramathea as Christ's great uncle, I think.
It's a very common assumption by the churches who use the Aramaic language New Testament. Because of the exact word used.
I agree that Joseph of Arimathea was the uncle of Mary, which would make him a brother of Mary's mother. I agree that Mary's mother was of the tribe of Levi, making Mary of the tribe of Judah on her father's side andthe tribe of Levi on her mother's, however, Zachariah and were in the hill country of Judah (Judea) not in the tribe of Benjamin. The hill country extend all the way to Hebron, which was a priestly city of the Kohathites, which is in the actual of the tribe of Judah not Benjamin. So it is a large area. It could be that Mary was born where you say but how did she get to Nazareth? Is that where her father and mother lived. Usually the kinsman redeemer was the brother of the husband. Perhaps though when Mary's father died there were no living relatives that could be a kinsman redeemer so perhaps Joseph of Arimathea helped. Kinsman redeemer does not necessarily mean a man must marry the widow, especially if se does have children by her husband but he would make sure that the family land could not be lost to someone outside of the tribe. However, in Mary's mother's case being of the tribe of Levite there would be no land inhertance. Her husband's relatives ( because they were of the tribe of Judah) any land would revert to if she had no sons. Although in some cases daughters could inherit the land if they married in her own tribe. It could have been a sticky situation seeing that Mary's parents were from 2 different tribes.
Joseph may have moved to Nazareth to find work in nearby Sepphoris, which required lots of construction labor. Skilled craftsmen move around to where big projects were located.
Elizabeth had two parents. Maybe her mother was from the tribe of Judah and that's how she was related to Mary.
@@gideon2060under the law to be a Levitical preast, you must be married to a daughter of Levi
Before even watching, he was the uncle, a tradesman!🤠
How miraculous that you know something without bothering to either learn or verify! Too bad you'll never know how ignorant you are by this means.
@@gregrice1354
I’m well researched in the theology of this subject 👍🙏🏻🤠 You do some!
'gbra' (Aramaic) means "mighty man" or "big man" - - and means pretty much what our contemporary "old man" does: depending on context, it can mean either father or husband. In this *highly* geneological context, it'd lean toward father. And the last block of 14 generations won't count correctly any other way. Don't ignore checksums - - they're there to help! However, one compelling item still in your favor is that we have 'begats' all the way Mt. 1 until we get to Joseph, who does not 'begat' Mary, but rather is this 'gbra'.
Whether father or guardian, it is every bit as likely that Joseph had simply died by the time of Jesus' ministry, as many others infer. If he were still alive, why would Jesus turn to John on the cross and tell him to look after his mother? The eldest son providing for his widowed mother makes sense: doing that if he were still alive would not. Also note that other Scripture in the gospels covers reactions to Jesus' ministry by his mother and his brethren (including betimes that they though he'd gone off the rails) - but nothing about Joseph.
Your making Mary's "Joseph" == the one of Arimathea always begs explaining how a carpenter got rich and because a prominent council member.
Still chewing on Mary being of the tribe of Levi. I'd never considered that before. Many thanks for your input here!
As I explain it is all about how the Aramaic word is used IN CONTEXT. It can NOT mean father.
Thank you. I really appreciate this your study. ❤❤❤ Yosef in the Chosen tv series.
The course of Abia tells you when Jesus was conceived and born
sept, 29
@@SteveBurke03181962 Yep
What I want to know is: If Mary the mother of Jesus Christ was born?/raised? in the hill country in the town of Ramah, how was she betrothed to Joseph of Nazareth? That was a significant distance between the two towns, and also I assume that any female descendant of Levi would not be given in marriage to just anyone. 🧐
Both Joseph and Mary were descendants of David. But additionally Mary was also a descendant of Aaron, on her mother's side. We do not know why she would have resettled to Nazareth where Joseph was also living.
your interpretation raises a serious question: On the cross Jesus gave his mother to John the beloved. Why then Joseph would not resume his duties towards Mary since he was Her guardian before she was bethrosed?
It's quite simple. Just as the narrative states, Jesus, while he was still alive took care of stating who her guardian should be. There was no question.
Sir the Holy Spirit has born witness to me of the correct ✅ interpretation of your results…. Thank s be t God for the witnesses of the Holy Spirit
Interesting hypothesis.
Mathew gives josephs perspective
Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's..
Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law
Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...
Your statements are absolutely not true. Luke's gospel specifically states that it is Joseph's genealogy. Matthew is from Mary's.
No first century copies of the gospels exist in Aramaic. The earliest copies of the texts are in Greek. How do you conclude that differing words "man" and "husband" were used in the original Aramaic? It's still debated whether there even was an original Aramaic.
No first century copies of the gospels exist in Greek either. The different words are in the Aramaic text just as I showed. You can check it out for yourself. The Greek text uses the same word. This is evidence that the Aramaic was first - not Greek.
@@eclipseeventsigns The gospel authors wrote in Greek. Any Aramaic text is derived from the Greek.
@@devindevon There is no actual proof for your statement. There is evidence that it was Greek translated from Aramaic.
Have you read the book "Whence came they."
No. But I've done research into the topic. It does not hold water historically or with convincing evidence.
What are your credentials please? Thank you.
Ask the Author of the book?
What is the book about? I can't find it anywhere. I've done a lot of research on Joseph of Arimathea. Just curious. :)
Joseph was a tin miner in Glastonbury England 😊
There is no Biblical evidence for that. Neither is there any historical documentation for that. It's just a legend.
@@eclipseeventsigns Yes there is. E Raymond Capt has a documentary on it called Traditions of Glastonbury where Joseph is buried
@@bluesky6985 There is NO evidence. Just because someone claims something doesn't mean it's true. I've looked into the supposed evidence and there is none.
@@eclipseeventsigns The Glastonbury thorn.
@@bluesky6985 Tradition, legend and fanciful thinking. There is no biblical evidence. None whatsoever.
Passover was on a Wednesday when Jesus was crucified 😊
Yes, it was. I have 2 videos with a lot of evidence for that.
@@eclipseeventsigns I have the companion Bible
@@eclipseeventsignsjesus Christ died on Passover, 14. Nisan, Friday, April 3, 33 ad at 3 pm.
The last supper was held on Tuesday night on the Passover of the essenes. He was arrested the same night and presented to the mock court of the sadducees and the high priest annas. The trial before the sanhedrin was the day of Wednesday from the first tamid to the second tamid (9am to 3 pm)
Cross examination before pilate was Thursday morning and audience before herod was Thursday afternoon. Crucified on Friday Passover of the jews.
This chronology was not possible before the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls and deciphering the essene calendar
@@jperez7893 The things you state are just not possible. See my other videos with plenty of proofs which show why what you state is impossible.
@@eclipseeventsigns sorry. The blood moon eclipse of 3april 33 ad fits all conditions as the day of crucifixion on a Friday
He was Jesus's kinsman-redeemer! Had to be related!
You have it backwards. Jesus paid his debts.
@@gideon2060 Jesus paid Joseph of Arimatheas spiritual
debt. Joseph of Arimathea didn't pay anything, he merely ask Pilate for and claimed Jesus's body because he was his kinman's Redeemer.
That's just my humble opinion.
I was thinking that jesus was the nephew of Joseph. He must have been a Levi same as Mary Jesus mother
Joseph Bar Matthias saw 3 friends on crosses. He asked Titus and received permission for them to be taken down and placed in his custody. 2 died and one lived.
What does that even mean? Where is there proof for what you are claiming?
@@eclipseeventsigns Joseph Bar Matthias is better known as Josephus. It's in one of his 2 books.
@@tomhohl4373 Again. Proof? What books?
@@eclipseeventsigns It was either "The Jewish War" or "The Antiquities" and it's not worth my time to re-read hundreds of pages just to try to convince someone who won't be convinced anyway. Whether you believe me or not, if you believe Jesus was God, sent by God into the world, you should learn about the world he was sent into. And Josephus offers the only detailed eye witness account of the events of 1st century Judea. If you believe in Jesus, you should read it for yourself.
@@tomhohl4373 Oh, I have read Josephus very closely. It's one of the main proofs that the New Testament was originally written in Aramaic and NOT Greek. And it's how I know that what you claim is NOT true. You said it wasTitus that gave permission. There was no one in power named Titus in Jerusalem during the crucifixion of Jesus.
This geneology of Mary is exactly what I have come to conclude by reading the Arameic texts, that Mary is a descendant of Levi, and NOT David. The Mesianic Jews claim that Mary was a descendant of David when questioned about how Yeshua is a descendant of David if Joseph (who is a descendant of David) is not his father.
So, if Mary is a Levite, then Yeshua HAS to be the biological son of Joseph to be a descendant of David, otherwise the prophecies were not fulfilled that he would come from the line of David. The Davidic line must be passed through the fathers line, not the mothers line.
God s Great, remember.
In Luke 3:23-38 Mary's paternal side comes from the lineage of Judah to David. While traditionally her maternal side is from the lineage of Levi. So Jesus is a Royal Priest; He both King and Priest. Judah is the symbol of Kingship, while Levites are Priesthood
@@user-ob8vx7mx1s Mary's geneology doesnt matter whatsoever when it comes to tribal lineage in Judaism. Tribal lineage ONLY comes through the biological father's bloodline.
So, either the virgin birth story was a lie, or Yeshua is not the messiah because he is not a descendant of David. You can not have it both ways.
Tribal lineage ONLY goes through the bloodline of the biological father. Adoption does NOT grant tribal lineage. He must be a flesh and blood descendant of David, through his biological father.
@@user-ob8vx7mx1s and no, Mary is a Levite, Not from the Davidic line. Her father was a Levite, it doesn't matter what her mother was because tribal lineage doesn't go through maternal line, ONLY paternal.
@@WH6FQE where is the evidence that Mary was a Levite?
This is really great! I will ask as important as joseph Arimathea was in the Bible A relative they need to let their dead rest. Its like someone writing on your dresses ancestors photos its disrespectful and need to 🛑 Be respectful of other people property .Do not write on personal photoa are were going have real problems. These are the things that the Lord him self spoke of wicked acts. And cause division ➗ And someone need to find out who is causing thins its not coming from us but someone is doing it.
AMAZING BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP!
Thank you for that. A lot of people don't recognize that especially if it goes against their preconceived notions.
The Lord is great the spirit is great
Great job
Thank you.
Very good research! Only error is your German attributed name of God. You will not ever find the pronunciation you use in any ancient Hebrew bible. There are tons of evidence and actual “ANCIENT “ codex pronunciations of YEHOVAH. You would be wise to truly investigate from Hebrew sources to give correct honor to God’s glory by His name. Other than that, nice job!
Thanks. Not sure what you are referring to. But in any case, getting the pronunciation "right" is not that important. God is not being "conjured" based on how you say His name.
@@eclipseeventsigns Wow, I'm astounded at your response. Of course God's name is not like a genie in a bottle, but he makes it very clear that his name is very important to HIM, despite what we might think. He dedicated one of the ten commands to not make False Vows specifically USING HIS NAME. Yeshua also put it at the head of what we call the Lords's prayer "Hallowed, Sacred, Set-apart" is your name. In John 17 he declares making Father's name known to his decibels, and that he will CONTINUE to make it known. So important that God placed his holy unique name 6,827 times just in the Tanakh alone. Malachi 2:1-2
@@4robertbates There was nothing to be astounded by. I just don't agree with people making a huge issue of the EXACT pronounciation as if it is a magic spell. The main point is the power/person that is behind the "name". Not the mouth shapes that utter a particular set of sounds.
Otherwise the word "Jesus" that has been used is totally meaningless. That was not the Messiah's actual name. It was Yeshuah.
Mathew gives josephs perspective
Lukes gospel emphasises Mary's..
Where there no sons ,the husband takes the place of the father in law
Eg 1st chronicles chap 2-34-36 had do sons, only daughters , and a Egyptian servant and the genealogy continued through the daughter even though the father was Egyptian...