REU - Candidate Sites for Artemis Base Camp: Locations, Base Plans, & Science Traverse Options

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024
  • In Summer 2021, two REU interns, Erin Pimentel and Charlie Willard, worked with SETI Institute's Dr Pascal Lee to identify two dozen candidate sites for NASA's future Artemis Base Camp near the South Pole of the Moon. This Summer (2022), two new REU interns, Sofi English and Cody Johnson, worked with Dr Lee to examine more closely the three most promising areas from last year's study: Shackleton-DeGerlache Ridge, Shackleton-Slater, and Mt Kocher.
    Cody, a US Army veteran and now a student at Western Nevada College, investigated where, specifically, the Artemis Base Camp's solar array, comms antennae, habitat structures, and landing/launch pad might be set up at each candidate site. Sofi, an aerospace engineering student at Texas A&M, investigated for each location the optimal traverse paths astronauts could rove to access local sites of highest scientific interest.
    If you have any questions, our panelists will be happy to answer them in the comments. Thank you for watching!
    If you like science, support the SETI Institute! We're a non-profit research institution whose focus is understanding the nature and origins of life in the universe. Donate here: seti.org/donate
    Learn more about the SETI Institute and stay up-to-date on awesome science:
    Subscribe to our RUclips channel at / setiinstitute
    Watch our streams over on Twitch at / setiinstitute
    Listen to our podcast, Big Picture Science www.bigpictures...
    Subscribe to our newsletter seti.org/signup
    Buy merchandise from Chop Shop www.chopshopst...
    Don't forget to like and subscribe! Ring the bell for notifications of when we go live.
    #setilive #artemis #moon

Комментарии • 16

  • @omabep
    @omabep 2 года назад +3

    watching from nijmegen, the netherlands

  • @allurbase
    @allurbase 2 года назад +1

    Data science and space exploration, nice combo!

  • @alaskajdw
    @alaskajdw 2 года назад +1

    Great presentation by all !!

  • @roterotevideo
    @roterotevideo 8 месяцев назад

    Sounds like they need a lunar tram system. Which sounds like a good idea since the dust is so caustic. It could be graded and wouldn’t even need to be pressurized.

  • @friendlyone2706
    @friendlyone2706 2 года назад +2

    Numerous locations associated with apparent lava tubes are now believed to be average earth temperature. Given the energy savings from not needing heating or cooling, would they be considered for lunar base camps?

    • @sofienglish4648
      @sofienglish4648 2 года назад +2

      We have not considered lava tubes for base camp, but have researched them for preliminary traverses as a scientific target. Thank you for your question!

  • @sergey9986
    @sergey9986 2 года назад

    This Shackelton pad area looks pretty bumpy to me despite having the right slope

    • @sofienglish4648
      @sofienglish4648 2 года назад +1

      The moon is full of impact craters and cratered regions, the South Pole is no exception. Exploring any area of the lunar South Pole will definitely be bumpy and rough, but nonetheless full of scientific return!

    • @sergey9986
      @sergey9986 2 года назад

      @@sofienglish4648 Sorry for being blunt, but I'm not sure how it answers my question. It does not say how they plan on using this landing pad despite having the right slope, if it has so many craters.

    • @codyjohnson2794
      @codyjohnson2794 2 года назад +1

      @@sergey9986 One potential option would be to use robotic assets to flatten the terrain further to make it more lander-friendly! As for what NASA is currently considering for the actual Artemis missions, I am not 100% sure what solutions they have come up with yet.

  • @fredericholmstrom6091
    @fredericholmstrom6091 2 года назад

    It is probably not planned out yet but geothermal energy or martianthermal energy will be used to power life support systems on Mars. Engineering a vast tunnel network to connect to heat vents below Mars will offer many benefits and diverting other elements to a facility on Mars for reprocessing can also help lower the risk of damaging solar panels and graphite batteries. A nuclear reactor should be built on the moon. If possible nuclear power can be reused underground however a water supply is needed.

    • @sofienglish4648
      @sofienglish4648 2 года назад +1

      I agree with you there, using a nuclear reactor could potentially be more beneficial than using solar power. Unfortunately, this study has not considered anything other than solar power due to the way NASA would like to build a base (from NASA's Lunar Exploration Program Overview). For future studies, it would be beneficial to look at and plan alternative ways to power a base like nuclear reactors. Thank you for your comment!

  • @TheMoneypresident
    @TheMoneypresident 2 года назад +1

    I think anything that has been put into orbit should be sent to moon once used. Iss waste ,dirty laundry. Broke hardware etc. On the moon everything would be valuable.

    • @sofienglish4648
      @sofienglish4648 2 года назад

      This is not my specific focus, however I am somewhat familiar with the topic of planetary protection. There are certain rules and regulations that astrobiologists have created for dealing with these type of things. But interesting nonetheless, thank you for your comment!