BWR Refuling Machine Camera N180-TZ

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
  • System design by Ahlberg Electronics AB www.nuclear-cameras.com
    N180-TZ is a high radiation tolerant camera designed for permanent mounting on a refueling machine mast.
    It features the Ahlberg Color MRAD camera with specially designed electronics and shielding for high radiation environments.
    For more information about our Mast Camera, please visit www.ahlberg-ele...

Комментарии • 325

  • @uberbosst
    @uberbosst 5 лет назад +306

    My recommended got pretty wild after Chernobyl

    • @dariocardajoli6831
      @dariocardajoli6831 5 лет назад +5

      You didnt see any graphite on the floor cauz its not there!

    • @rot_studios
      @rot_studios 5 лет назад +1

      Wild... and interesting!

    • @krashd
      @krashd 5 лет назад +4

      I hear that it's spread all around the planet by now and it could be many months before RUclips recommended returns to safe levels.

    • @vladabuba
      @vladabuba 5 лет назад +2

      @@dariocardajoli6831 not great, not terrible.

    • @vladabuba
      @vladabuba 5 лет назад +1

      @@krashd From 15000 to 3.6?

  • @HJWhitehall
    @HJWhitehall 8 лет назад +305

    I love the blue glow of Cherenkov Radiation. It's eerie and amazing.

    • @frachris87
      @frachris87 8 лет назад +36

      +Heather Whitehall-Thompson It's one of those things that's beautiful to look at, but when you think about it, you realize just how dangerous it really is.

    • @HJWhitehall
      @HJWhitehall 8 лет назад +9

      I agree with you on how dangerous nuclear power is. Still, the blue glow is so pretty.

    • @kylesenior
      @kylesenior 8 лет назад +16

      +Heather Whitehall-Thompson I'm sure he was referring to the glow being dangerous, not the nuclear power itself.

    • @gtask8
      @gtask8 8 лет назад +16

      +frachris87 All the pretty things are usually dangerous haha

    • @jetegtmeier71
      @jetegtmeier71 8 лет назад +3

      forgive my ignorance but I thought it was impossible to go faster than the speed of light ????

  • @aval1998
    @aval1998 9 лет назад +124

    Oh boy a claw game! i should work here!

  • @robertborchert932
    @robertborchert932 9 лет назад +71

    Ah, the beautiful blue glow of Cherenkov radiation!

    • @brtd9418
      @brtd9418 7 лет назад

      Robert Borchert v

  • @dannywilliamson3340
    @dannywilliamson3340 Год назад +4

    Been there! I worked 7 outages as a fuel handler. It was better than a lot of other jobs that go on during outages.

    • @TheHeatExchang3
      @TheHeatExchang3 Год назад

      Do fuel handlers work for the plants ? Or is their a specific task force so to speak that travels from plant to plant carrying out and handling ?

    • @dannywilliamson3340
      @dannywilliamson3340 Год назад +1

      @@TheHeatExchang3 Both. GE brought in their team of drivers who were ususally "vessel techs" also. And there were 6-8 of us from plant staff who moved fuel and operated the fuel transfer system.

    • @jaredhaines5718
      @jaredhaines5718 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@dannywilliamson3340getting my fuel moving cert soon. Maybe I'll be on the bridge with you one day

  • @clearingbaffles
    @clearingbaffles 8 лет назад +28

    I was stationed on a first generation boomer and to reduce my radiation exposure they put in the refueling enclosre and I got to watch the shipyard workers removing all the modules individually all under 10+' of water and then install the new core in one shot, the black n white pictures in the reactor plant manual didn't do it justice, fortunately I no longer need a flashlight.

  • @dalejr183
    @dalejr183 3 года назад +4

    The blue glow of neutron radiation slowed down before the speed of light is awesome

    • @manuelurquiza7546
      @manuelurquiza7546 2 года назад

      Ccherenkov radiation shows up when photons are traveling faster than speed of light

    • @williampask9396
      @williampask9396 Год назад +1

      It's caused by charged particles (electrons in this case) moving faster than light (light moves slower in water so this is possible)

  • @DB-47
    @DB-47 10 лет назад +2

    Perfekte Aufnahme von Tscherenkow-Strahlung und dazu Schlieren von heißer Kernkraftstoft. Bestes Video direkt von Reaktor!

  • @Orthrus
    @Orthrus 8 лет назад +7

    Thank you for uploading this. It's fascinating, beautiful, and eerie.

  • @JMVuko
    @JMVuko 11 лет назад +7

    Fantastic fuel movement. Interesting way of storing the DBG. I did not see the operator pull the FA when loaded in the SFP.

  • @wheeln24-79
    @wheeln24-79 5 лет назад +6

    Crazy how it glows like that! I would be afraid to put that glowing one next to all the stored ones but they know what they're doing so.

  • @colchronic
    @colchronic 5 лет назад +26

    I hear it's equivalent to a chest x-ray

    • @paulanderson79
      @paulanderson79 4 года назад +2

      Not even that much. There's several meters of water between you and the core.

  • @monkeyboy4746
    @monkeyboy4746 9 лет назад +12

    THX1138, you are entering a critical phase here.

  • @MultiHunterOne
    @MultiHunterOne 7 лет назад +6

    Simply beautiful.

  • @Managarn
    @Managarn 5 лет назад +8

    Ahlberg...The air is glowing! I say we evacuate the town

  • @freefall0483
    @freefall0483 5 лет назад +4

    Jesus. The decay heat and the glow!!!!!

  • @hotwhells20
    @hotwhells20 5 лет назад +3

    Holy shit... i thought that they stop the reaction to change the fuel... That's one of the most beautiful things I've ever seen

    • @rsedivy2
      @rsedivy2 5 лет назад +3

      I'm almost certain they do. However, there's a lot of fissile material that is the result of the decay of fuel that continues to emit a lot of neutron radiation even after the chain reaction has stopped, which probably gives off the Cherenkov radiation. (only about 6% of the power output though)
      Source: I'm a complete layman, I have no clue what I'm talking about, just guessing.

    • @lv3184
      @lv3184 5 лет назад +6

      Ventura 19
      There is no nuclear chain reaction going on in this video. What you‘re seeing here is a spent nuclear fuel assembly being removed from a shut down boiling water reactor during its annual outage. The blue glow, which is called Cherenkov radiation, that is being emmited by the fuel assembly is not caused by nuclear fission. It is mainly caused by beta particles (electrons) that are travelling faster than the speed of light in water. The beta particles are being emitted by the radioactive decay products that are left over when an uranium or plutonium atom is split. These decay products, also called fission products, are what makes spent fuel extremely radioactive and their radioactive decay also heats up the fuel.

    • @niznikb
      @niznikb 5 лет назад +4

      @@rsedivy2 Actually, it's not neutrons that cause Cherenkov effect. It's the beta particles (electrons) that are being emitted (through beta decay) by fission products.
      To get Cherenkov effect you need a particle:
      a) having an electric charge (neutrons have no charge) and:
      b) traveling at a velocity exceeding the (group) velocity of light in a given medium (here: water). Only electrons can do that.
      Yes, the fission reaction is stopped. That means: no more atoms are being split (well... almost). But it's the atoms that have already been split (the ones that remain in the "spent" fuel rods) that undergo beta decay and cause the blue glow.

  • @Medicranger
    @Medicranger 7 лет назад +22

    Always wonder why in the movies, they color it green when it's clearly blue.

    • @E9X330
      @E9X330 6 лет назад

      David Jimenez because uranium ore is green

    • @TealJosh
      @TealJosh 5 лет назад +4

      @@E9X330 it's yellow actually.

    • @E9X330
      @E9X330 5 лет назад

      @@TealJosh depend on which type of uranium ore actually

    • @urquanseven2332
      @urquanseven2332 4 года назад +1

      Same reason why toxic sewage is depicted as green when most toxic sewage is yellow or brown. It just looks more menacing.

    • @urquanseven2332
      @urquanseven2332 4 года назад +2

      @@E9X330 So I looked more into it, and torbernite is green, and uranium glass is green and glows green under UV light. That might be where it comes from.

  • @Domvelando
    @Domvelando 6 месяцев назад

    all hail the cherenkov radiation! IT'S SO BEAUTIFUL

  • @regrobinson7643
    @regrobinson7643 9 лет назад +16

    To answer Truthseeker's question the blue glow is called Cherenkov Radiation named after the Russian scientist. it is caused by some of the beta particles emitted by the fuel interacting with the water and extending into blue light spectrum. The other emitted energy and particles are beyond the human eye's ability.

    • @murdakah
      @murdakah 9 лет назад +14

      +Reg Robinson Just to add, the cherenkov radiation is like a sonic boom for light. When the speed of a particle in a medium is faster than the speed of light in that medium, the particle will slow down by releasing energy in the form of photons. Just note that the particle still travels slower than c (speed of light in a vacuum)

  • @PaulyRenzeth
    @PaulyRenzeth 9 лет назад +13

    Why i like to work here
    1 is like a complicated claw machine
    2 It glow blue so is like a blue glow sticks

  • @DrLeroyGreen
    @DrLeroyGreen 5 лет назад +16

    Does anyone else have a metallic taste in their mouth?

  • @outtolunch2834
    @outtolunch2834 5 лет назад +5

    Question for the science geeks :). How do they know exactly which rods are spent or are they all replaced at once after a given span of time?

    • @ArchangelUltra
      @ArchangelUltra 5 лет назад +14

      Core neutronics simulations will be able to predict burnup of fuel rods. Buildup of fission products give radiation signatures that are also a reflection of burnup. Most PWRs operate in ‘batches,’ where one third of the fuel is removed and replaced. The rest of the fuel rods are moved around to make burnup more uniform over time.

    • @outtolunch2834
      @outtolunch2834 5 лет назад +1

      @@ArchangelUltra Cool, Thanks.

    • @christopherleubner6633
      @christopherleubner6633 Год назад +1

      They get moved around from the outside to the center then out. The rods are far from truly spent, but are pulled for safety reasons mostly because they can crack open or have unstable reactivity as the isotope composition changes internally.

  • @wheeln24-79
    @wheeln24-79 5 лет назад +2

    I know they have control rods to control the output of the fuel bundles in the reactor but what stops all those fuel bundles from reacting or doing the nuclear thing when they're stored right up next to each other like where he put that glowing one he took out? Didn't look like there was any shielding between them. Maybe a thin metal wall/container. Or is that all it takes? Are they lead walls between them? Cuz there isn't that in the reactor so makes sense they'd react with each other much easier. Nuclear power is creepy in that sense. The way it glows, and how inserting a rod will stop it. I never understood how only a few control rods could limit the amount or shut down a whole reactor. In my mind I'd think you'd need a rod between each fuel bundle to stop them from reacting with each other. Guess that's why there's smarter people than me making and operating these things. Thanks to anyone who takes the time to tell me about the things I don't understand.

    • @E9X330
      @E9X330 5 лет назад

      It's all about criticality

    • @monkeyboy4746
      @monkeyboy4746 5 лет назад

      My guess is that there are rods in the spent pool that contain control rod material(boron) which absorb neutrons and thus prevent the nuclear reaction.

    • @pllagunos
      @pllagunos 4 года назад

      Borated water

    • @colinm3130
      @colinm3130 3 года назад

      They no longer are radioactive enough and they are not being bombarded with a neutron source. But they need to sit in the tanks for about 2 weeks to cool down. I am sure it's also more complicated than what I said. The frame is likely cadmium to soak up neutrons.

    • @dannywilliamson3340
      @dannywilliamson3340 2 года назад +1

      The structural elements of the spent fuel pool racks have imbedded boron. It absorbs all free neutrons so that no chain reaction is possible.

  • @devzeppelin1911
    @devzeppelin1911 4 месяца назад

    Man that bundle is long, it just keeps on going

  • @wwlb4970
    @wwlb4970 5 лет назад +5

    It is funny how the reloading machine should shake the fuel assembly to densely insert it into reactor. A precision gen. II CANDU deserves.

    • @dannywilliamson3340
      @dannywilliamson3340 2 года назад +1

      That's the operator shaking it to make sure it seats fully.

  • @latmask00
    @latmask00 5 лет назад +1

    Wow, fantastic view. Thanks!

  • @jason1440
    @jason1440 6 лет назад

    That fuel bundle was hot as hell fire. Not temp. hot but rad hot.

  • @DeathWaves
    @DeathWaves 3 года назад

    Came here from Scott Manley "Going Nuclear" series :)

  • @coffeeandpeach
    @coffeeandpeach 6 лет назад +5

    How tall are thise fuel elements?

    • @andrew7637
      @andrew7637 4 года назад +1

      These BWR types are about 12 feet long.

  • @BeTep_jlepeMeH
    @BeTep_jlepeMeH 3 года назад

    Effect of Vavilova-Cherenkova is clearly seen. I mean the blue light around fuel bundles. Extremely dangerous but beatiful

  • @phalanx3803
    @phalanx3803 5 лет назад +1

    3:38 so are there single and duel fuel assemblies? or is this some sort of dummy / place holder Assembly?

  • @jonahruiz4101
    @jonahruiz4101 9 лет назад +2

    it sambaing to look at and think about science when you see this i always wonder ho was the one who came up with all this science stuff we have today how long did it take to make this up and how did somebody figure this shit out and be able to actually study and use it.

  • @maksimmuruev423
    @maksimmuruev423 6 лет назад +1

    How they actually put rod back? On video skipped this moment. I think it's pretty hard to do.

  • @selchap3054
    @selchap3054 6 лет назад +1

    Why's the camera not picking up bright flecks of radiation bombardment we might observe from other sources ?

    • @TealJosh
      @TealJosh 5 лет назад +1

      It has a receiver that filters out the high energy gamma radiation particles. If it didn't have that filter the radiation would destroy the receiver very quickly.

    • @andrew7637
      @andrew7637 4 года назад

      Ahlberg makes tanks that just so happen to have cameras.

  • @derekwall200
    @derekwall200 9 лет назад +1

    man that rod is just glowing blue cause its super hot as in radioactive

    • @brianhill2701
      @brianhill2701 9 лет назад +1

      Really

    • @E9X330
      @E9X330 6 лет назад +2

      Derek Wall wrong

    • @julian5857
      @julian5857 Месяц назад

      The speed of light in water is pretty low so you can observe Cherenkov radiation rather early. If you see it in air though... Run.

  • @dorsalispenile9891
    @dorsalispenile9891 5 лет назад +4

    Does that wiggle really necessary?

    • @3User
      @3User 5 лет назад +2

      The wiggle allows the rods to go in easily, the more force you exert into the rods trying to push them in, the more resultant force you get from the friction induced in pushing the rods in, wiggling them significantly reduces the friction

    • @Rsmith600
      @Rsmith600 5 лет назад

      The Dyatlov wiggle..

  • @DanielDaniel1
    @DanielDaniel1 Год назад

    Am I right to assume that the containers are designed or pulled out in a specific pattern to avoid an accidental criticality incident?

    • @dannywilliamson3340
      @dannywilliamson3340 Год назад +1

      By "containers" you mean fuel assemblies? If so, the storage racks have neutron absorbing material built into them, and, in the core, all control rods are inserted during fuel handling. So the reactor is in cold shutdown.

  • @titan133760
    @titan133760 5 лет назад +2

    So the whole core is underwater the whole time?

    • @johannesgehrs9888
      @johannesgehrs9888 5 лет назад +2

      Yes

    • @arturz7
      @arturz7 5 лет назад +3

      Yes, but in normal operation water level in RPV is lower, at upper part BWR reactors they have steam separator/dryers.

  • @ravlbi4268
    @ravlbi4268 5 лет назад +2

    isn't it avaible on Amazon?

    • @yourdad-lb4kh
      @yourdad-lb4kh 2 года назад +1

      Yeah, it is available. I just bought it but I don't know why the cops are yelling outside my house

  • @OortCloud
    @OortCloud 2 года назад

    Is this within the core? I highly doubt it is, and I have zero clues on the camera's perspective relative to the reactor

    • @keeno86
      @keeno86 2 года назад +1

      This is the core of the reactor and the spent fuel pool 👍 the camera is mounted to the mast of the refueling machine, 60 or more feet underwater

  • @truthseekers666
    @truthseekers666 9 лет назад +6

    Excuse my ignorance, Is this rod thing being pulled out glowing from its radiation or is it just a lighting effect. The area all the rods seemed to be in had a peculair glow which I had not seen before. Is this just a normal camera or is it in some way sensitive to radiation. Just curious.

    • @olimoutain
      @olimoutain 9 лет назад +22

      That blue light is the glow of Cherenkov radiation.

    • @778918
      @778918 9 лет назад

      I'm pretty sure that blue glow is something you can actually see and is due to radiation. There are other videos of water submerged reactors where you can see it too. I think it might be cherenkov radiation.

    • @DANOBILL
      @DANOBILL 9 лет назад +17

      This is called the Cherenkov effect its caused when particles (usually electrons) move faster than the speed of light in a medium (in this case water) and interacts with atoms. Exciting them and causing them to release photons which you can see with the naked eye as blue light.

    • @redkiller4all
      @redkiller4all 9 лет назад

      DANOBILL I don't believe you because nothing can move faster then the speed of light. That's one of the laws of the universe.

    • @Fundad93
      @Fundad93 9 лет назад +27

      TheRedBritish nothing moves faster than the speed on light in a vacuum. this video was shot underwater. the speed of light underwater is much less than that in a vacuum, so much less that electrons can exceed it and emit a glow.

  • @keyable
    @keyable 8 лет назад +1

    after Reactor shut down, when is it possible to refuel? I mean after shut down there is high decay of heat, so it can damage the handling device

    • @dannywilliamson3340
      @dannywilliamson3340 2 года назад +2

      The reactor is taken to cold shutdown before vessel disassembly can begin. Coolant temperature is maintained at about 120F.

  • @danielhunter34
    @danielhunter34 6 лет назад

    I love that colour

  • @TheGeekazoid
    @TheGeekazoid 5 лет назад

    right let me get this strait when the rods are spent they still at critical mass and are still producing radiation as in heat and gamma rays from the small uranium that's left in them still reacting... IF I'm correct in my thinking then how do the nuclear operators know when to swap out a rod? is it when they detect a rod isn't producing the same heat as the rest as in getting cooler? ALSO when they add a new rod to replace the one removed is the new rod in a separate pool full wack at critical mass producing heat and then in water it's picked up by a similar crane and transported into its slot in the core?? OR do they remove all the rods into cooling pools drain the entire water around the core and then a team moves in to fit in all new rods and water is pored in to get the rods at critical mass??

  • @TheGeekazoid
    @TheGeekazoid 8 лет назад +5

    where do the put the spent rods??? I'm guess they still be hot?? how long does it take them to cool down?

    • @WaterSlideLover98
      @WaterSlideLover98 8 лет назад +5

      They put them in these pools for about 10 years to cool down. Then they put the rods in canisters and ship them in huge concrete buildings to decay the radiation.

    • @MegaFPVFlyer
      @MegaFPVFlyer 8 лет назад +10

      They aren't really "still hot," they're well below 100 degrees C assuming the reactor isn't pressurized.
      Better description would be "still producing heat" because they're always reacting to some degree.

    • @4Gehe2
      @4Gehe2 8 лет назад +6

      You can see that they are still very hot, the blue glow they are emitting is Cherenkov radiation. There is a very real reaction happening in the fuel.

    • @Numitronic
      @Numitronic 7 лет назад

      Hot can mean ''radioactive'' or hot as in heat... Of course spent rods are highly radioactive , and so, rather hot by themselves due to the decay, but they are not that physically hot even in the reactor, as it is cooled down by the water.

    • @conscienciapositiva8706
      @conscienciapositiva8706 5 лет назад

      I think that the spent rods contain plutonium due to a chemical reaction. I think....

  • @NoogahOogah
    @NoogahOogah 3 года назад

    At first I thought this was a “refuting machine” and I couldn’t wait to see it argue.

  • @jmcooney2000
    @jmcooney2000 Год назад

    Cool vid 👍

  • @elkwyre
    @elkwyre 10 лет назад +17

    it feels like I'm getting radiation just by looking at this

    • @placeholdername0000
      @placeholdername0000 10 лет назад +2

      Dont worry. It shielded by several meters of water. And water is better at stopping radiation that you would think.

    • @Adnub
      @Adnub 9 лет назад +2

      Zypofaeser
      Indeed. XKCD did some funny number crunching on this as well. what-if.xkcd.com/29/

    • @Jemalacane0
      @Jemalacane0 8 лет назад +10

      +elkwyre You are getting radiation, but not from looking at this. There is a big ball of hot gas in the sky which gives you lots of radiation. The earth itself gives you radiation.

    • @mariusmuller2420
      @mariusmuller2420 7 лет назад +6

      You are getting exposed to radiation by watching this, but mostly not from the kind of radiation that's harmful. Your screen emits photons while gamma rays are photons too, just with a much higher energy then you standart screen can emit.
      Additionally you get some actually harmful radiation by just existing (cosmic rays, earths inherent radiation). Funny thing is: you yourself are naturally radioactive (the harmful kind).

    • @Simulacrum1310
      @Simulacrum1310 5 лет назад

      Has your face turned suddenly red? If yes, I have bad news for you.

  • @FlyingSeaMan256
    @FlyingSeaMan256 5 лет назад

    Amazing! I handle the waste!

  • @Napoleon_Blownapart
    @Napoleon_Blownapart 5 лет назад

    The glow is eerie as fuck

  • @alexanderalcyone7776
    @alexanderalcyone7776 10 лет назад +1

    Can I use this footage to make a music video?

  • @Maloy7800
    @Maloy7800 10 лет назад

    Why the air seems to be flowing around the rods like it's very hot? Or is it air?

    • @enthalpy
      @enthalpy 8 лет назад +3

      +Maloy7800 It's water. The reactor core is underneath about 55 feet of water.

  • @TheMrKeksLp
    @TheMrKeksLp 5 лет назад +1

    3.6, not bad not terrible

  • @schlaznger8049
    @schlaznger8049 7 лет назад

    How is the radiation removed from the water? What happens to the water when it changed or flushed out?

    • @TealJosh
      @TealJosh 5 лет назад +3

      Water becames active in only one way, tritium, which is H3 essentially. It is created in very tiny amounts, so small it could be vented into athmosphere, it probably isn't though. Other procuts that can become activeted such as materials from the construction surrounding the fuel rods are filtered out by simple water purifiers. The water itself doesn't ever need to be flushed out, though it slowly evaporates and then more water needs to be added.

  • @DitzyClouds
    @DitzyClouds 3 года назад

    Wait they get refuled while running?

  • @ewandougie
    @ewandougie 11 лет назад +1

    Nice Checkhov radiation at 1:13

  • @chaosinmybreath
    @chaosinmybreath 11 лет назад +1

    Amazing.

  • @uralicdneprov1806
    @uralicdneprov1806 6 лет назад +1

    What would happen if operator accidentally pulled used rods above water level? I know the machine is designed to prevent that from happen, I'm just curious about radiation level in the hall emitted by recently used fuel. A sun lotion would not help then? :-)

    • @andrew7637
      @andrew7637 4 года назад +1

      You'd have a lot of dead workers and a massive problem

    • @colinm3130
      @colinm3130 3 года назад +1

      The fuel would heat up and start to melt along with the cladding around it. They store hem in the pools for a few weeks to allow them to cool down enough to be transported.It's not so much about the radiation as it is the heat. Three Mile Island is an example of fuel being uncovered resulting in a melt down. They also had a similar problem at Fukushima. Even though they had shut down he reactor, the problem was a loss of water to the storage tanks with the spent fuel.

  • @GrantW74
    @GrantW74 10 лет назад +1

    The second bundle of two tubes. Are they control rods they are different to the first

    • @legorigplaysmc
      @legorigplaysmc 9 лет назад +1

      first ones are fuel bundles, second one is control rods

    • @MoFVoGel
      @MoFVoGel 7 лет назад +7

      I think that the second ones are fuel rods as well. I think that the top part is simply a different design, to be able to refuel 2 elements at the same time. Since this is a BWR, the control rods are inserted from the bottom and dont look like fuel elements. BWR control rods look like a "+" (top down view), not like a square

    • @HeinrichVonTotenkopf
      @HeinrichVonTotenkopf 7 лет назад +8

      The 2nd "fuel rod" picked up in this video is called a Double Blade Guide. Their purpose is to keep 2 fuel bundles standing straight up, and not topple over in that cell, since an open cell (top-guide) doesn't have a grid to support them individually. They contain no fuel, and merely act as a place holder for fuel bundles to eventually take their place during fuel shuffling.
      Your statement about the control rod blade is correct though!
      Reactor Service Technician here. Licensed fuel handler.

    • @MultiHunterOne
      @MultiHunterOne 7 лет назад

      HeinrichVonTotenkopf Are startup neutron sources handled just like fuel rods? I'm really curious.

    • @chornobylreactor4
      @chornobylreactor4 5 лет назад

      They are fuel assemblies I hear those things can be jerks

  • @nabilabuasba1357
    @nabilabuasba1357 5 лет назад

    Beautiful

  • @conscienciapositiva8706
    @conscienciapositiva8706 3 года назад

    I wonder what will happen in the next WWW and obviously types of bombing raids such as Dresden can destroy nuclear reactors?

  • @gascap_actual
    @gascap_actual 8 лет назад +3

    how deep is that water?

    • @placeholdername0000
      @placeholdername0000 7 лет назад +1

      Several meters. Generally 2 meters of water is needed for radiation shielding. Due to the length of the rods and the need to hold rods above each other the pool is probably around 10 meters deep. Perhaps a little more.

    • @moltres5740
      @moltres5740 7 лет назад +8

      I work refueling nuclear reactors. The water in the core section is about 55 feet (17.5 meters) deep to the top of the fuel.

  • @raphmaster23
    @raphmaster23 6 лет назад +3

    Poor little fuel rod no longer wanted 😞 story of my life too 😋

    • @chornobylreactor4
      @chornobylreactor4 5 лет назад +1

      They are fuel assemblies after it cools down they will be taken to an fuel assembly care center to be checked for injuries if only minor their treated for it if major it will be put down. If there is an explosion 1000s of fuel assemblies will be killed instantly or left to die slowly in their spent fuel pool. Fukushima had 1000s of those poor fuel assemblies tortured and fragmented even had a few of them smashed against the wall with enough force to make it's body explode the fuel assembly's bloody entrails slide down the walls the others scream in horror as their friends are slaughtered there were some survivor fuel assemblies who remember the massacre some of tried to kill themselves when found out the reactors they loved and will never intentionally hurt were dead some of the fuel assemblies were forced to hurt and kill their reactors

    • @illuminate4622
      @illuminate4622 5 лет назад

      @Chernobyl reactor4 😂😂😂

    • @krashd
      @krashd 5 лет назад

      I'd like to give a fuel assembly a forever home, who do I write to?

  • @alpha3836
    @alpha3836 3 года назад +1

    You know a Hardened Color Camera is noice when its called *_Rad_* Hardened Color Camera

  • @VeronicaGorositoMusic
    @VeronicaGorositoMusic 5 лет назад

    I was there close to the camera!
    thought it'd be the coolest thing to do but I'm ok now 👌😄

  • @YamiPoyo
    @YamiPoyo 2 года назад

    The two at once that were flopping all over what are those?

    • @keeno86
      @keeno86 2 года назад

      Those are hollow shells designed to support control rod and fuel bundles in each cell, called a blade guide

    • @dannywilliamson3340
      @dannywilliamson3340 Год назад

      They swing around while moving through the water because they're hollow tubes.....relatively light.

  • @yourbigfan1777
    @yourbigfan1777 Год назад

    1:26 is this wobbling done in order to make sure the bundle is completely out? 😂

  • @Tirnadi
    @Tirnadi 3 года назад

    We need more of this lol

  • @TheBothWorlds
    @TheBothWorlds 10 лет назад +1

    is it still in water

    • @jandavies8515
      @jandavies8515 10 лет назад +5

      Yes,meverything is done underwater

  • @derekwall200
    @derekwall200 9 лет назад +1

    you can already see the heat in the pool from the rods. without the water there it'd be more radioactive than the sun

    • @Jemalacane0
      @Jemalacane0 8 лет назад +5

      +derek wall Not even close.

    • @derekwall200
      @derekwall200 8 лет назад

      Jemalacane0 I know the amount of radiation combined with all the planets nuclear waste. its enough to kill all 6.5 million on the planet several million times over

    • @colinm3130
      @colinm3130 3 года назад

      Actually they would be less radioactive without the water, but they would also melt. The water slows down neutrons which creates more radioactivity. Because Hydrogen in the water only has a single neutron it helps reduce the speed of the neutrons which then increases the chance of hitting more U235 atoms and fissioning.

    • @derekwall200
      @derekwall200 3 года назад

      @@colinm3130 yeah that sounds right.

  • @weisswurster
    @weisswurster 5 лет назад

    Bet the operator of this machine is good at the claw game.

    • @dannywilliamson3340
      @dannywilliamson3340 2 года назад +1

      Very good. From the operator's cab, it's about 70 feet down to the top of the core.

  • @jarettmcdonald5827
    @jarettmcdonald5827 10 лет назад +2

    How much do thos weigh

    • @phalanx3803
      @phalanx3803 5 лет назад

      you wouldn't be able to get close enough to carry it security would shoot you well before you get any where near the reactor building.

    • @douro20
      @douro20 4 года назад +2

      According to Robert Masterson's book on nuclear heat transfer a BWR fuel assembly weighs about 275 kilograms or just over 600 pounds. This is a lot less than one used in a PWR- about 40 percent less- since the fuel spacing in a BWR is larger.

  • @MrBrewww
    @MrBrewww 10 лет назад +2

    wow the rod is glowing.,

    • @Featinwe
      @Featinwe 10 лет назад +7

      This is Cherenkov radiation

  • @zofiakrasowska6423
    @zofiakrasowska6423 3 года назад

    is water moderator here?

    • @colinm3130
      @colinm3130 3 года назад +1

      Moderator and coolant. Which means if you lose your coolant, you also lose your moderator and thus the loss of water also means loss of radioactivity. Chernobyl taught us why using Graphite for a moderator and water for a coolant was a bad bad idea.

  • @christubemt
    @christubemt 9 лет назад +1

    So how hot is in there?

  • @ISaacffds
    @ISaacffds 7 лет назад

    How does this camera block radiation?

    • @E9X330
      @E9X330 6 лет назад

      ISaachpA lots and lots of shielding

  • @juniordantas02
    @juniordantas02 5 лет назад

    Awesome

  • @Simulacrum1310
    @Simulacrum1310 5 лет назад +10

    It's just 3.6 roetgens. I've seen worse

    • @LMSILVIA
      @LMSILVIA 5 лет назад +2

      Cherenkov effect, completely normal. Can happen with minimal radiation...

    • @Simulacrum1310
      @Simulacrum1310 5 лет назад +1

      @@LMSILVIA ItS jUsT fEeD wAtEr

    • @Rsmith600
      @Rsmith600 5 лет назад

      Why is there graphite on my roof?

  • @oskarmiazga1951
    @oskarmiazga1951 5 лет назад

    Please explain me why the used rod was glowing from cherenkov radiation, i mean how that was possibile ?

    • @TGLasers
      @TGLasers 5 лет назад +1

      Afterglow, its still emmitting after its been in use. The cherenkov radiation dims down when the fuel stops fission. But even after fission has stopped it will still radiate for a while

    • @oskarmiazga1951
      @oskarmiazga1951 5 лет назад

      @@TGLasers so in these used rods there is some fuel?

    • @TGLasers
      @TGLasers 5 лет назад +1

      @@oskarmiazga1951 This is the radioactive fuel. the rods themselves are the fuel

    • @oskarmiazga1951
      @oskarmiazga1951 5 лет назад

      @@TGLasers i know but aren,t they completly empty after use

    • @TGLasers
      @TGLasers 5 лет назад +1

      @@oskarmiazga1951 No. They are "used up" but theres still alot of fuel left in them. there just inst enough for the power plants to efficiently produce power with them so they are decommisioned before all is fissioned up

  • @Simulacrum1310
    @Simulacrum1310 5 лет назад +1

    4:18 "well that's not great, nor horrifiying"
    4:21 "puke in front of Politburo"

  • @tammyroyce8013
    @tammyroyce8013 8 лет назад +1

    RESERVING COMMENT
    FOR NOW WILL OBSERVE MORE

  • @douro20
    @douro20 5 лет назад +1

    I believe those baskets are made of zirconium.

    • @3User
      @3User 5 лет назад

      Yeah, it's a zirconium alloy, or industrially known as "zircaloy" cladding around the fuel rods

  • @akira9946
    @akira9946 5 лет назад

    why do they shake those rod bundles, isn't that dangerous?

    • @apillow8724
      @apillow8724 5 лет назад +3

      What would make it dangerous?

    • @akira9946
      @akira9946 5 лет назад

      @@apillow8724 idk, they could get damaged physically and cause problems. i find it disturbing how they shake them like it's lemonade and not highly radioactive matter.

    • @apillow8724
      @apillow8724 5 лет назад +1

      Aki Ra
      I suppose that’s true, but at the speeds involved I find it unlikely that any damage beyond a few dents will occur. The shaking itself seems very negligible. There is a lot of give in the contact between the handler and the fuel bundle. Not so that it can fall, but so that the bundle is free to twist and glide as it does.
      I didn’t really notice any extreme shaking in this video, can you point it out to me?

    • @akira9946
      @akira9946 5 лет назад

      @@apillow8724 they shake them from 5:25, and 2:32 , also there are moments when the bundles are lifted out and they twist around each other, i get scared that they might detach and fall from 4:12 and on. idk maybe i'm just panicky, but it looks too lose to me.

    • @apillow8724
      @apillow8724 5 лет назад +3

      Aki Ra
      Yeah, I see what you mean. It certainly does look a lot less rigid than you might expect. I just think it is not that likely that a bundle would detach as a result of such shaking. It’s actually not that intense, it would appear. But still, everyone has a right to be concerned.

  • @parp777
    @parp777 9 лет назад +3

    Those are some long rods

    • @krashd
      @krashd 5 лет назад

      Said the actress to the group of bishops.

  • @3User
    @3User 5 лет назад

    It's sad that we haven't switched to molten salt breeder reactors yet, we'd get a much higher yield of energy. Those rods have only used 5% of their isotopes, the other 95% goes to waste, decaying away over thousands of years.

    • @Inorbit97
      @Inorbit97 5 лет назад

      Coniver Divide why does the rest go to waste? Why aren’t they using the full true capacity?

    • @3User
      @3User 5 лет назад

      @@Inorbit97 the uranium used in fission reactions is uranium-235, the uranium which is found abundantly in nature is uranium-238, with a tiny proportion of uranium-235 mixed in with it. This uranium 238 is further enriched industrially so that the quantity of uranium 235 in the rods increases. After the enrichment, around 98% of the rod is uranium 238, and 2% Uranium-235. A fuel rod typically has a lifespan of 3 years, over these years the uranium 235 gets used up, and the waste products that are formed make up 5% of the composition of the rod, the rest is all uranium-238, which could be recycled by nuclear reprocessing, but doing so is considered too expensive by the companies which provide the power, thus, the rods are thrown away as nuclear waste and keep decaying and giving off all the remaining energy over thousands of years.

    • @colinm3130
      @colinm3130 3 года назад +1

      Breeder reactors are not to generate power, but to create fuel. The rrods in these reactors get re-proressed to separate all the isotopes and reuse some for fuel. India, which doesn't have a lot of Uranium, bu a lot of Thorium is using Thorium breeder reactors to make Uranium for their thermal reactors. But the rest certainly does not go to waste. Even the U238 ( reactor fuel is only about 3% U235) can be turned into Plutonium or used for anti-tank bullets.

  • @abelucious
    @abelucious 7 лет назад +2

    Don't drop that.

    • @chornobylreactor4
      @chornobylreactor4 5 лет назад

      Ok accidently drops a fuel assembly and it gives me an evil look😤👺 me: sorry fuel assembly I didn't mean to. Fuel assembly: snarls and hisses. Me: touches the thing. Fuel assembly: bites and scratches the hell out of my hand and arm. Me: yelling all kinds of cuss words. Fuel assembly: 😁😮

  • @shamnampatandy
    @shamnampatandy 10 лет назад +23

    Nuclear wessles.

  • @Shinzon23
    @Shinzon23 5 лет назад

    Wait, is that Cherenkov radiation in air or water?

    • @paulanderson79
      @paulanderson79 5 лет назад +1

      water. You won't see it in air or a vacuum.

    • @Shinzon23
      @Shinzon23 5 лет назад

      @@paulanderson79 oh, you can see it in air... but that means yer fucked

    • @mscheese000
      @mscheese000 5 лет назад +2

      @@Shinzon23 Blue glow in air is ionization of nitrogen and oxygen, not cherenkov radiation.

  • @doc.voltold4232
    @doc.voltold4232 5 лет назад +1

    That look so early 90s

  • @bobbysingh7386
    @bobbysingh7386 5 лет назад +1

    Cherenkov Radiation, completely normal 🤣

  • @aspopulvera9130
    @aspopulvera9130 5 лет назад

    still... everything there is extremely hot that the water seems to distort the light

    • @ShimrraJamaane
      @ShimrraJamaane 5 лет назад +1

      Yes, it is very hot but not so hot that it instantly boils water. In fact, that spent fuel pool is cool enough for divers to swim in.

    • @aspopulvera9130
      @aspopulvera9130 5 лет назад

      @@ShimrraJamaane do spent fuel is where the DU came from?

    • @ShimrraJamaane
      @ShimrraJamaane 5 лет назад +1

      @@aspopulvera9130 The majority of DU munitions is sourced from the byproduct of uranium enrichment which contains a low percentage of fissile uranium. Some DU is extracted from spent fuel but that is a significantly smaller amount (almost negligible). Here is a WHO fact sheet on DU: web.archive.org/web/20120815092349/www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs257/en/

  • @Xantec
    @Xantec 9 лет назад +1

    is it me or is the fuel rod glowing blue?

    • @draconas109
      @draconas109 9 лет назад +1

      it's not just you, they do glow blue

    • @alexswenson1193
      @alexswenson1193 9 лет назад +11

      It's called cherenkov radiation. Beta particles from the fission products move faster than the speed of light in water. Those particles create a shockwave of light that appears blue when it reaches your eyes.

    • @mickey8238
      @mickey8238 9 лет назад +1

      +AlexSwesson stfu you don't know shit 😑

    • @draconas109
      @draconas109 9 лет назад +12

      Tyreek Foster he's actually right dude

    • @aperson4811
      @aperson4811 7 лет назад +3

      It is Cherenkov radiation but hes wrong about the mechanism. It is produced by Beta particles and it puts the molecules around it in an excited state.

  • @conscienciapositiva8706
    @conscienciapositiva8706 5 лет назад

    An idiot question: these (old)rod contains plutonium?

    • @TealJosh
      @TealJosh 5 лет назад +1

      Fission products from commercial plants contain traces of plutonium. Less than 0.01%

    • @thefinalfrontier4686
      @thefinalfrontier4686 5 лет назад +2

      yes, for a light water reactor, with a burnup of 45 GWj/t
      , about 1% of the mass of spent fuel is plutonium
      For the rest,
      -95% is uranium (with a residual enrichment of about 1% U235)
      -For 4%, these are fission products
      -For 0.1% minor actinides (Np, Am, Cm...)
      All wrapped in a zirconium sheath

    • @chornobylreactor4
      @chornobylreactor4 5 лет назад

      @@thefinalfrontier4686 I'm an pure breed lwgr or rbmk

    • @alvarobg0620
      @alvarobg0620 3 года назад

      If, although very little, with a nuclear fuel processor spent you can get up to 20% plutonium

  • @akhil1781
    @akhil1781 5 лет назад

    Why is it glowing

    • @mczenk5095
      @mczenk5095 5 лет назад

      Cherenkov radiation. Particles moving faster than light through water.

    • @paulanderson79
      @paulanderson79 4 года назад

      @@mczenk5095 more accurately entering the water where their speed is low than it would be in a vacuum. (Light travels more slowly in water).

  • @skrame01
    @skrame01 7 лет назад +3

    Gee no chance of damaging fuel rods here, just move them around like boxes at Amazon!

  • @MarcioCostacantor
    @MarcioCostacantor 2 года назад

    Boa tarde! Pra mim é uma honra viu prestigiar seu trabalho, vamos sempre juntos somar e fortalecer nossos objetivos, Conto com você, eu já estou por aqui,,.,

  • @GOLTURBO555
    @GOLTURBO555 10 лет назад

    Everybody knows that without the rods, the chain reaction goes on... How the hell this reactor works? is fully opened, I didnt saw any rod for neeutron control... Can somebody explain me please? I know that the new and fresh fuel, could get contact with air, but the spent no... so the under water, and how the hell they flood the top of reactor! Just dont understand it.

    • @drongomaster
      @drongomaster 10 лет назад +4

      Changing (increasing or decreasing) the flow of water through the core is the normal and convenient method for controlling power from approximately 30% to 100% reactor power. When operating on the so-called "100% rod line," power may be varied from approximately 30% to 100% of rated power by changing the reactor recirculation system flow by varying the speed of the recirculation pumps or modulating flow control valves. As flow of water through the core is increased, steam bubbles ("voids") are more quickly removed from the core, the amount of liquid water in the core increases, neutron moderation increases, more neutrons are slowed down to be absorbed by the fuel, and reactor power increases. As flow of water through the core is decreased, steam voids remain longer in the core, the amount of liquid water in the core decreases, neutron moderation decreases, fewer neutrons are slowed down to be absorbed by the fuel, and reactor power decreases.(wikipedia)

    • @GOLTURBO555
      @GOLTURBO555 10 лет назад

      drongomaster so.. in this situation, the power of reactor without the rods is controlled only by weater flow in the core? The water looks very "quiet"... but, Im on the way to complete understand it... I thought that how much more water flow, less is the power, how much less water flow, more power and heat... but... I will check it better. Thanks

    • @GOLTURBO555
      @GOLTURBO555 10 лет назад

      Tomakak
      I know that, but... I can't see the rods! with out them, the water as moderator, can't deal with the fission alone... If is a PWR, they should be come from top, BWR bottom, but what Im asking basically is... In the reafueling procedure, the rods stay inserted? On PWR the system come from the top of reactor, if the rods are inserted, how they do that?! You know what I mean?

    • @GOLTURBO555
      @GOLTURBO555 10 лет назад +1

      Tomakak
      RBMK chernobyl reactor, needs to stay with the rod out, for the reaction increase... The way I understand it, rods nedds to be out of the core for slow the cain reaction. Confused.

    • @GOLTURBO555
      @GOLTURBO555 10 лет назад

      me1967100
      nuclear bombs, and nuclear reactors... The secret is how simple they are...

  • @marcvachesus9071
    @marcvachesus9071 7 лет назад

    i wonder if anyone in the world ever drop a fuel rod down in the cooling pool or the reactor !! i guess it is a houston we have a probleme type of deal lol

  • @MateeGamevideos
    @MateeGamevideos 4 года назад

    damn, you can see it heating up the water