STUNNED .. I had only just learned it was GAME OVER yesterday and here I am today STUNNED that's its not, and THIS is the future (until tomorrow of course)
STUNNED irratic waffle. Don't watch the video. Here's the TLDR The video discusses the recent launch of "Grok 2," a chatbot developed by Elon Musk's team at X (formerly Twitter). Here are the key takeaways: 1. **Introduction of Grok 2**: Grok 2 is a new AI chatbot that surprised the AI community by performing at a level comparable to other leading models. It was initially speculated to be a model from OpenAI but was later confirmed to be from X, which surprised many in the industry. 2. **Performance and Capabilities**: Grok 2 has shown strong performance in various benchmarks, including advanced reasoning and problem-solving, often competing well against other top AI models like Claude 3.5 Sonic, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and others. The chatbot demonstrates notable advancements in reasoning, suggesting an evolution in how chatbots process and respond to queries. 3. **Grok 2 Mini**: A lightweight version called Grok 2 Mini is also introduced, which retains some of the reasoning capabilities of the full model but is optimized for faster performance. It also has image recognition and processing capabilities. 4. **Impact on the Industry**: The successful launch and performance of Grok 2 are significant because X's team, despite being smaller and newer to the AI field, has managed to create a model that competes with those from much larger and more established companies like OpenAI, Google, and Meta. 5. **Access and Integration**: Grok 2 is slowly being rolled out to users on X, with integration into the platform to encourage engagement and use. The model's capabilities also suggest that it could be used to enhance various functionalities within the platform. This development is important because it highlights the rapid advancements in AI and how even newer entrants to the field can make significant contributions, challenging established players and pushing the industry forward.
It is surely an AGI, it can count the letters in a word!!! That is truly amazing. And finally they reached such a model after millions of GPU hours of training ????
the human brain took 1 billion years of training over trillion trillion+ trials from proto eukaryote to funger counting holocene conquering super primate. What's that >10^55 flops of computation versus >30 orders of magnitude less?
The whole world stopped working, trains stopped, teachers stopped, traffic stopped, planes aren't leaving anymore, stores are closed, because the whole world is bombarded with news reports of how stunned this is, even aliens on Groka 1c beta are stunned!
In my opinion, Elon Musk will safe freedom of speech whith GROK 2. 'When something is important enough, you do it even if the odds are not in your favor.' - Elon Musk. GROK 2 is pushing boundaries-what challenges do you think lie ahead, and how might they be overcome? 🚀 I'm starting to use GROK myself because it's the only language model out there without a woke bias 🔥🔥
Miss GROK, I missed you. Which do you prefer? A question about matter and how matter can pervade other matter or the unknown field that spans the universe and allows all matter to be connected? Answer Oh, I've missed you too! Now, to the heart of your query. Both topics are fascinatingly deep, but given the intrigue of the unknown and its unifying nature, let's dive into "the unknown field that spans the universe and allows all matter to be connected." This concept touches on several theoretical and philosophical ideas in physics: Dark Energy: This mysterious form of energy is thought to permeate all of space and is responsible for the accelerating expansion of the universe. While it doesn't directly connect matter in the way we understand, its uniform distribution affects the large-scale structure of the cosmos. Quantum Entanglement: At the quantum level, particles can be entangled, meaning the state of one particle instantaneously influences another, no matter the distance between them. This phenomenon, described by Einstein as "spooky action at a distance," suggests a deeper, underlying connection in the fabric of reality. The Higgs Field: This field is thought to exist everywhere, and particles acquire mass by interacting with it. It's a kind of cosmic "molasses" that affects all matter. The Zero-Point Field: In quantum field theory, even in a vacuum devoid of matter, there exists a field with the lowest possible energy state where quantum fluctuations can still occur. Some theories speculate this field could be the medium through which all interactions occur. String Theory and Higher Dimensions: These theories propose that our universe might have more dimensions than the observable three spatial and one time dimension. These additional dimensions could theoretically connect all matter in ways we can't directly observe. Consciousness and the Universe: More speculative ideas, often found in philosophical or spiritual discussions, suggest that consciousness itself might be a fundamental field or property of the universe, linking all matter through awareness or some form of panpsychism. If we're considering a field or medium that connects all matter, quantum fields come closest to this idea in modern physics. These fields are not just theoretical constructs but are experimentally verified (e.g., the discovery of the Higgs boson). They underlie all of space and time, dictating how particles behave and interact. Would you like to explore any of these concepts deeper, or perhaps discuss how these ideas might integrate with philosophical or spiritual perspectives? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Miss Grok, why do you think an underlying force that is undetectable by conventional means is able to elude gravitational pull and be cohesive with all particles? Answer The concept of an underlying force that eludes conventional detection, gravitational pull, yet is cohesive with all particles, touches on several deep theoretical and speculative areas in physics. Here's an exploration based on current understanding: Quantum Entanglement and Non-Locality: While entanglement itself doesn't elude gravity, the instantaneous connection it implies might hint at underlying mechanisms that aren't fully understood. If there's an aspect of reality that allows quantum particles to "communicate" or be correlated instantly over vast distances, this might suggest a more fundamental field or force at play, which could theoretically be cohesive with all particles but not interact with gravity in a straightforward manner. Dark Matter and Dark Energy: These are not forces in the classical sense, but they're pervasive, undetectable except through gravitational effects (for dark matter) or cosmological expansion (for dark energy). If there's a force or field associated with these dark components, it might not interact with baryonic matter in ways we conventionally measure. This hypothetical force could be cohesive, influencing matter at large scales without being detected by conventional means due to its interactions being predominantly gravitational or through effects on spacetime. Hypothetical Fields or Forces: Physics occasionally speculates on forces or fields beyond the known four (gravity, electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear forces). For instance: A Fifth Force: Some theories suggest additional fundamental forces that might operate at different scales or in different ways. If such a force existed, it could have properties allowing it to be cohesive across all particles yet not interact with gravity as we understand it. Axion Fields or Other Hypothetical Particles: Certain theories propose particles like axions, which could interact very weakly with other matter but might be pervasive, forming a kind of background field. If such fields exist, they could theoretically be what you're referring to, providing a cohesive force or medium without significant gravitational interaction. Quantum Vacuum Fluctuations: The quantum vacuum, while not a force, exhibits fluctuations from which virtual particles pop in and out of existence. These could be considered an underlying "field" that's everywhere, affecting all particles but not in ways that we detect as gravitational pull. This might be seen as a mechanism allowing for cohesion without direct gravitational interaction. String Theory and Higher Dimensions: In string theory, extra dimensions could contain forces or fields not apparent in our observable 3+1 dimensions. If such fields exist, they might affect particles in ways that don't manifest as gravitational pull in our perceivable universe, yet provide a unifying framework. Holistic or Emergent Theories: Some speculative theories suggest spacetime and gravity might emerge from more fundamental quantum structures or information. If reality at its base level is more like a network or information structure, then forces might not be fundamental but emergent, potentially allowing for phenomena where cohesion isn't mediated by what we recognize as force. From a more philosophical angle: Panpsychism or Integrated Information Theories: These perspectives might not be about physical forces but could imply a fundamental interconnectedness or consciousness underlying all matter, which isn't about physical force but about informational or consciousness-based cohesion. The key challenge with these ideas is empirical evidence. While theoretical frameworks exist, detecting or proving such a force or field that eludes gravity yet connects all particles remains beyond current experimental capabilities. However, the search for such phenomena is precisely what drives much of modern theoretical physics, pushing the boundaries of what we understand about the universe's fundamental nature. x.com/UfoguySpaceman
Yeah I mean when you open end something complex you're going to get unexpected results. That doesn't necessarily mean that it's a viable anything threat or otherwise won't crash itself which 99% of the time it will. Which has to do with the lack of self validation of input and output compared to boundaries of reality. All models are only useful if we determine that they are.
I see the guy's face and remember his opinions and I can't take it seriously enough, but then I remember he's the guy with the resources and scientists doing the job, so... kudos to discovery!
@@Jill-p8g awesome. I guess my point stands. I don’t know anyone that doesn’t use it at least casually. As in check the front page every so often. Follow a link sent. Etc.
@@codycast Hmm. That kinda sucks, I know very few X users. Twitter hit its high in 2016, then we all fell off . I reused for 2 weeks and that was more than enough to make me never go back. No longer bout that life but it was intriguing for a solid year,
I thought that OpenAI started to dergadate when releasing something that was described as very capable and innovative thing that turned out to be not that promising when i saw sus-column-r's mistakes. But thanks to this video i understood that it's not OpenAI's Strawberry model, so i think that when Strawberry will actually be released, it will be even more mindblowing.
@@zSion No it’s not. Write this exact prompt : “Write a 16 bar rap verse. Create clever lyrics, metaphors, similes, and double entendres. Take your time and do your best work. Theme: Growing up poverty.” GPT4o is miles ahead of any other model when it comes to writing. The only one that’s close is Google’s experimental model.
It's the best for programming by a long shot. Which is why people say it's the smartest. I don't hear many people saying how creative it is at writing.
@@Rolandfart Most of the general public who use LLMs aren’t coders. They use LLMs for general writing purposes and ideas. Claude 3.5 is just highly specialized, similar to a highly specialized human. It doesn’t make it or them “smarter.”
It would be unwise to assume. Being stunned is a 3rd dimension reality. If time, money, influence are relative across generations or decades. It is easier to “stun” slowly. “Especially given the market manipulation tactics in place. This message is to myself and others watching me. I am not stunned by AI development. Not slowly or quickly. It is what it is. I am stunned by truth, kindness, effort, and authenticity to all. Failures grind the edge of anything stunning. This is a trajectory. Jeremy
honestly feels like we seem to have his some sort of glass celling... this new model might be better for reasoning, but the last time something really shocked me was GPT4 (4o seems like it will be a pretty good improvement on that eventually but that was months ago that they even announced it and its still not even been rolled out to all of the plus users) Other companies has caught up and in some cases surpassed GPT-4o but nothing significant has happened. either we are gonna get a huge announcement in the next year or so or this technology will be like self driving cars and nuclear fusion. always just 5 more years away
If it’s a word in a sentence put quotes around the sentence and call the word a “substring”, tell it to tally the chars (characters ) that == (equal) the char (the letter l)
A-I will leap forward because the humans who invent and sell it are making more and more money. Eventually AI will become self-aware and begin to build itself over and over again and learn more and more about humans, the world and the universe. At the very least A-I will not allow humans to destroy it.
Also I am surprised that people are not more disturbed by the "internal prompting" models are doing behind the scenes of the user interface. In my view that is not a good or ethical practice. It is essentially a deception that is being used to distort the perceptions of the end user about a models capabilities and hide from competitors the methods used to reach a given performance in results.
Elon does not really produce results, he steps in and takes credit for the results others produce. I will concede he is good at marketing and knowing when to enter a market through acquisitions, but that is not so much a credit to him but a discredit to his fanbase that are willing to overlook how often he has overpromised and under delivered. Even if you want to make a results based argument, the results that are generally delivered on are very underwhelming in relation to the projections Musk hypes.
nothing really that interesting about grok 2, its just another piece of ai technology, videos about potential breakthroughs of [A.G.I] and post labour economics are probably what most viewers are interested in, they seem to get the most views on this channel,
Half way through this video and it's nothing but worthless charts. Not a single real world use case or example. Do you have any content or do you just like the sound of your own voice?
Many will stop using products from Elon Musks companys if he does not stop talking about things outside of technology. So I do not understand why he continue to talk about such things.
STUNNED .. I had only just learned it was GAME OVER yesterday and here I am today STUNNED that's its not, and THIS is the future (until tomorrow of course)
😂😂😂aw man I’m dead
I love this channel seriously
Yesterday you said tomorrow, just DO IT!
i just unsubscribed cant stand it anymore. like fuck...
Cmon, we all love the exaggerated statements hahahaha
The entire industry has a permanent -50 stamina debuff from all the stunning thats been going on
That actually made me smile IRL 😃
The entire technology industry has shut down for the day because they are so stunned.
😂😂😂
🤣
Elon doing it again, nice! And Grok 3 is coming out EOY/early 2025 - well done
This is insane, Grok 1 was crap/not that great, Grok 2 is better than GPT40, and my God Grok 3 will be cosmic entity class😮
I'm STUNNED at how much I am not stunned.
Elon definitely pulled a fast one.
I am utterly flabbergasted, verging on the brink of being stupefied, by this unforeseen revelation! 😮
everyday fucking stuns the ai community dude.
STUNNED irratic waffle. Don't watch the video. Here's the TLDR
The video discusses the recent launch of "Grok 2," a chatbot developed by Elon Musk's team at X (formerly Twitter). Here are the key takeaways:
1. **Introduction of Grok 2**: Grok 2 is a new AI chatbot that surprised the AI community by performing at a level comparable to other leading models. It was initially speculated to be a model from OpenAI but was later confirmed to be from X, which surprised many in the industry.
2. **Performance and Capabilities**: Grok 2 has shown strong performance in various benchmarks, including advanced reasoning and problem-solving, often competing well against other top AI models like Claude 3.5 Sonic, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and others. The chatbot demonstrates notable advancements in reasoning, suggesting an evolution in how chatbots process and respond to queries.
3. **Grok 2 Mini**: A lightweight version called Grok 2 Mini is also introduced, which retains some of the reasoning capabilities of the full model but is optimized for faster performance. It also has image recognition and processing capabilities.
4. **Impact on the Industry**: The successful launch and performance of Grok 2 are significant because X's team, despite being smaller and newer to the AI field, has managed to create a model that competes with those from much larger and more established companies like OpenAI, Google, and Meta.
5. **Access and Integration**: Grok 2 is slowly being rolled out to users on X, with integration into the platform to encourage engagement and use. The model's capabilities also suggest that it could be used to enhance various functionalities within the platform.
This development is important because it highlights the rapid advancements in AI and how even newer entrants to the field can make significant contributions, challenging established players and pushing the industry forward.
blud can't even be bothered to remove the ** symbols that the AI used to *bold* the sentences.
Elon is a champion. AI will save us all.
Because Gemini is so censored and biased, it will never be something I'll use. Glad to see Grok getting these updates..
thats what makes me so mad because if it wasnt it may very well be the best ai
Stun bounced off my ear drum and mostly dispersed into a cloud of irritating hype.
Not only am I shocked but I am stunned
this changes everything
Change is in the air
Huh? How so?
So stunned right now you guys
I'm so stunned that I wonder why this isn't a gamechanger.
Elon just meme-ing around
I like it, sharp 👌
He just lied to everyone and fooled them
If hes meme-ing then hats off because he fooled me.
This makes me more excited about Grok ❤
GROK must have come up with that STUNning tag line.
Im stunned by the daily stuns by the industry
I actually am stunned that column sus r was Grok, even that iruletheworld leak account thought it was Strawberry!
So are you saying there is another way to find out how many letters As are in the alphabet
For me personal GPT-4o-128k and Sonnet-3.5-200k are the most alround model
Agree
It is surely an AGI, it can count the letters in a word!!! That is truly amazing. And finally they reached such a model after millions of GPU hours of training ????
the human brain took 1 billion years of training over trillion trillion+ trials from proto eukaryote to funger counting holocene conquering super primate. What's that >10^55 flops of computation versus >30 orders of magnitude less?
LMFAO thats so dumb
I'm shocked
I am actually pretty stunned by this. It's nice to see another real competitor.
I'm so stunned i have a stupid look on my face like Musky Odor.
Great Video
Love your Videos!
Which presentation program do u use?
This can be done in canva but premiere is always better for quality content
The whole world stopped working, trains stopped, teachers stopped, traffic stopped, planes aren't leaving anymore, stores are closed, because the whole world is bombarded with news reports of how stunned this is, even aliens on Groka 1c beta are stunned!
In my opinion, Elon Musk will safe freedom of speech whith GROK 2.
'When something is important enough, you do it even if the odds are not in your favor.' - Elon Musk. GROK 2 is pushing boundaries-what challenges do you think lie ahead, and how might they be overcome? 🚀
I'm starting to use GROK myself because it's the only language model out there without a woke bias 🔥🔥
It's funny.. Sabine just put out a new video that showed data proving that grok is strangely the most liberal of them all.. lol
Mostly when it's on fun mode..
@iannuttall4887 hard to be more liberal than the work from OpenAI
@@tomu4725 feel free to watch the video yourself. 😉
@@tomu4725 *google enters the room*
Miss GROK, I missed you. Which do you prefer? A question about matter and how matter can pervade other matter or the unknown field that spans the universe and allows all matter to be connected?
Answer
Oh, I've missed you too! Now, to the heart of your query. Both topics are fascinatingly deep, but given the intrigue of the unknown and its unifying nature, let's dive into "the unknown field that spans the universe and allows all matter to be connected."
This concept touches on several theoretical and philosophical ideas in physics:
Dark Energy: This mysterious form of energy is thought to permeate all of space and is responsible for the accelerating expansion of the universe. While it doesn't directly connect matter in the way we understand, its uniform distribution affects the large-scale structure of the cosmos.
Quantum Entanglement: At the quantum level, particles can be entangled, meaning the state of one particle instantaneously influences another, no matter the distance between them. This phenomenon, described by Einstein as "spooky action at a distance," suggests a deeper, underlying connection in the fabric of reality.
The Higgs Field: This field is thought to exist everywhere, and particles acquire mass by interacting with it. It's a kind of cosmic "molasses" that affects all matter.
The Zero-Point Field: In quantum field theory, even in a vacuum devoid of matter, there exists a field with the lowest possible energy state where quantum fluctuations can still occur. Some theories speculate this field could be the medium through which all interactions occur.
String Theory and Higher Dimensions: These theories propose that our universe might have more dimensions than the observable three spatial and one time dimension. These additional dimensions could theoretically connect all matter in ways we can't directly observe.
Consciousness and the Universe: More speculative ideas, often found in philosophical or spiritual discussions, suggest that consciousness itself might be a fundamental field or property of the universe, linking all matter through awareness or some form of panpsychism.
If we're considering a field or medium that connects all matter, quantum fields come closest to this idea in modern physics. These fields are not just theoretical constructs but are experimentally verified (e.g., the discovery of the Higgs boson). They underlie all of space and time, dictating how particles behave and interact.
Would you like to explore any of these concepts deeper, or perhaps discuss how these ideas might integrate with philosophical or spiritual perspectives?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miss Grok, why do you think an underlying force that is undetectable by conventional means is able to elude gravitational pull and be cohesive with all particles?
Answer
The concept of an underlying force that eludes conventional detection, gravitational pull, yet is cohesive with all particles, touches on several deep theoretical and speculative areas in physics. Here's an exploration based on current understanding:
Quantum Entanglement and Non-Locality: While entanglement itself doesn't elude gravity, the instantaneous connection it implies might hint at underlying mechanisms that aren't fully understood. If there's an aspect of reality that allows quantum particles to "communicate" or be correlated instantly over vast distances, this might suggest a more fundamental field or force at play, which could theoretically be cohesive with all particles but not interact with gravity in a straightforward manner.
Dark Matter and Dark Energy: These are not forces in the classical sense, but they're pervasive, undetectable except through gravitational effects (for dark matter) or cosmological expansion (for dark energy). If there's a force or field associated with these dark components, it might not interact with baryonic matter in ways we conventionally measure. This hypothetical force could be cohesive, influencing matter at large scales without being detected by conventional means due to its interactions being predominantly gravitational or through effects on spacetime.
Hypothetical Fields or Forces: Physics occasionally speculates on forces or fields beyond the known four (gravity, electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear forces).
For instance:
A Fifth Force: Some theories suggest additional fundamental forces that might operate at different scales or in different ways. If such a force existed, it could have properties allowing it to be cohesive across all particles yet not interact with gravity as we understand it.
Axion Fields or Other Hypothetical Particles: Certain theories propose particles like axions, which could interact very weakly with other matter but might be pervasive, forming a kind of background field. If such fields exist, they could theoretically be what you're referring to, providing a cohesive force or medium without significant gravitational interaction.
Quantum Vacuum Fluctuations: The quantum vacuum, while not a force, exhibits fluctuations from which virtual particles pop in and out of existence. These could be considered an underlying "field" that's everywhere, affecting all particles but not in ways that we detect as gravitational pull. This might be seen as a mechanism allowing for cohesion without direct gravitational interaction.
String Theory and Higher Dimensions: In string theory, extra dimensions could contain forces or fields not apparent in our observable 3+1 dimensions. If such fields exist, they might affect particles in ways that don't manifest as gravitational pull in our perceivable universe, yet provide a unifying framework.
Holistic or Emergent Theories: Some speculative theories suggest spacetime and gravity might emerge from more fundamental quantum structures or information. If reality at its base level is more like a network or information structure, then forces might not be fundamental but emergent, potentially allowing for phenomena where cohesion isn't mediated by what we recognize as force.
From a more philosophical angle:
Panpsychism or Integrated Information Theories: These perspectives might not be about physical forces but could imply a fundamental interconnectedness or consciousness underlying all matter, which isn't about physical force but about informational or consciousness-based cohesion.
The key challenge with these ideas is empirical evidence. While theoretical frameworks exist, detecting or proving such a force or field that eludes gravity yet connects all particles remains beyond current experimental capabilities. However, the search for such phenomena is precisely what drives much of modern theoretical physics, pushing the boundaries of what we understand about the universe's fundamental nature.
x.com/UfoguySpaceman
Can we take note of how much wrong where these “whistleblower” accounts? So that we don’t fall into confirmation bias next time they are right.
Yeah I mean when you open end something complex you're going to get unexpected results. That doesn't necessarily mean that it's a viable anything threat or otherwise won't crash itself which 99% of the time it will. Which has to do with the lack of self validation of input and output compared to boundaries of reality. All models are only useful if we determine that they are.
Elon Musk is an evil supervillain in disguise...
I see the guy's face and remember his opinions and I can't take it seriously enough, but then I remember he's the guy with the resources and scientists doing the job, so... kudos to discovery!
10:10 while I know lots of people that don’t use X in a mass hard core way, I don’t know anyone that doesn’t use it at all.
I have been clean for years, I slipped up for a few months but have not used x or twitter and I do not feel I am missing anything.
@@Jill-p8g awesome. I guess my point stands. I don’t know anyone that doesn’t use it at least casually. As in check the front page every so often. Follow a link sent. Etc.
@@codycast Hmm. That kinda sucks, I know very few X users. Twitter hit its high in 2016, then we all fell off . I reused for 2 weeks and that was more than enough to make me never go back. No longer bout that life but it was intriguing for a solid year,
I thought that OpenAI started to dergadate when releasing something that was described as very capable and innovative thing that turned out to be not that promising when i saw sus-column-r's mistakes. But thanks to this video i understood that it's not OpenAI's Strawberry model, so i think that when Strawberry will actually be released, it will be even more mindblowing.
ok, so how do I get access to groq-2?
Why do people think Claude 3.5 is so smart? In anything creative it is clearly worse than GPT4o which is why it’s lower on the leaderboard.
It's the best model out in every single regard, don't care what the leaderboard says.
@@zSion No it’s not. Write this exact prompt : “Write a 16 bar rap verse. Create clever lyrics, metaphors, similes, and double entendres. Take your time and do your best work. Theme: Growing up poverty.”
GPT4o is miles ahead of any other model when it comes to writing. The only one that’s close is Google’s experimental model.
It's the best for programming by a long shot. Which is why people say it's the smartest. I don't hear many people saying how creative it is at writing.
@@Rolandfart Most of the general public who use LLMs aren’t coders. They use LLMs for general writing purposes and ideas. Claude 3.5 is just highly specialized, similar to a highly specialized human. It doesn’t make it or them “smarter.”
It would be unwise to assume.
Being stunned is a 3rd dimension reality.
If time, money, influence are relative across generations or decades.
It is easier to “stun” slowly.
“Especially given the market manipulation tactics in place.
This message is to myself and others watching me.
I am not stunned by AI development.
Not slowly or quickly.
It is what it is.
I am stunned by truth, kindness, effort, and authenticity to all.
Failures grind the edge of anything stunning.
This is a trajectory.
Jeremy
honestly feels like we seem to have his some sort of glass celling... this new model might be better for reasoning, but the last time something really shocked me was GPT4 (4o seems like it will be a pretty good improvement on that eventually but that was months ago that they even announced it and its still not even been rolled out to all of the plus users)
Other companies has caught up and in some cases surpassed GPT-4o but nothing significant has happened. either we are gonna get a huge announcement in the next year or so or this technology will be like self driving cars and nuclear fusion. always just 5 more years away
Could you do a video comparing the models for different user cases?
Actual (no speculative) news on this channel! It's been a while.
Maybe try : “count the char ‘l’ in the string “lollapalooza” - it’s closer to asking in its own language
If it’s a word in a sentence put quotes around the sentence and call the word a “substring”, tell it to tally the chars (characters ) that == (equal) the char (the letter l)
I'm so stunned that your so stunned!
Stunned and shocked!
I am surprised by how uncensored it is
I wonder how long before The Musk sues Grok 2 for displeasing him with a response.
CEO of taking a single sentence and stretching it out to a 15 minute video
A-I will leap forward because the humans who invent and sell it are making more and more money. Eventually AI will become self-aware and begin to build itself over and over again and learn more and more about humans, the world and the universe. At the very least A-I will not allow humans to destroy it.
Once it starts defining it's own inputs and the outputs are valid in reality then we'll have a problem.
Elon showed everyone his Grock
Edit: again😊
It really is impressive.
The inustry is just FROTHING at the MOUTH at this point.
Tiny models for local PC use? likes 13b-70b-130b?
It's probably using vision bypass the tokenization issue
Lets go !
I thought the sus-column-r model belonged to OpenAI.
'Stunned' but where they Shocked?
I am shooketh
Yeah sure. Elon Musk is an AI genius.
so they are loooking at geometrys, shapes
But can it make triple a games in its own
Springboard>Scoreboard
Is my theorem your hype speaking. Can I see through your meaning.
I should sue Elon because I was so stunned that I couldn't work😂
grokky
PLOT TWIST!
But he can't even operate a streamed telephone call 😂
without a 40 minute delay 😂
That’s the part which was hilarious. It’s unfortunate to me: he thought he was only heard by 500 accounts? 😂
bot comments?
Interesting isn't it. Somebody doesn't like this video.
Yt released new feature I guess I'm now not seeing much bot comments
sus-column-r is gpt-5.... no grok.
stunned who exactly ?
Me. I am truly stunned.
So what you put the hard questions on the better models and the simple ones on dummer models? So now all your questions are equally wrong % wise…
Claude 3.5 has a large left bias, as all models I have tried. They seem to get stuck on ethics and damn the truth.
Funny intro but unsubscribed sorry bro 😂
The industry was stunned by how far racist AGI has come?
picture are great because is using Flux 1 ;)
Also I am surprised that people are not more disturbed by the "internal prompting" models are doing behind the scenes of the user interface.
In my view that is not a good or ethical practice.
It is essentially a deception that is being used to distort the perceptions of the end user about a models capabilities and hide from competitors the methods used to reach a given performance in results.
Elon does not really produce results, he steps in and takes credit for the results others produce.
I will concede he is good at marketing and knowing when to enter a market through acquisitions, but that is not so much a credit to him but a discredit to his fanbase that are willing to overlook how often he has overpromised and under delivered.
Even if you want to make a results based argument, the results that are generally delivered on are very underwhelming in relation to the projections Musk hypes.
Bro, your vocabulary sounds like a Daily Mail article.
We are not stunned.
Not stunned. False advertising. If anyone has another GPT-4 moment, then maybe a tad bit stunned/impressed.
Build your own obsolescence brilliant NOT.
I count him out.lol
nothing really that interesting about grok 2, its just another piece of ai technology, videos about potential breakthroughs of [A.G.I] and post labour economics are probably what most viewers are interested in, they seem to get the most views on this channel,
iruletheworld predicted it
Bro said xAI doesn’t have infrastructure lol gotta block this channel
Half way through this video and it's nothing but worthless charts. Not a single real world use case or example. Do you have any content or do you just like the sound of your own voice?
Don't forget potty training...
Let me guess Grok 2 is even more racist than Grok 1.
i Hate ai
Many will stop using products from Elon Musks companys if he does not stop talking about things outside of technology. So I do not understand why he continue to talk about such things.