Oh these are great overviews! Too often I feel like people do breakdowns that don't add much, but I like how you give detail about the effect the DP's choices have! I especially liked when you mentioned exposing night scenes more to print down (and thus get cleaner shadows). Apparently, between discussions and AC articles, rating high speed stock 2/3 to 1 stop slower is rather common. Andrew Lesnie (rip) did it and Cameron has apparently done it on a number of his films (I believe between his DPs).
This is one of the times RUclips algorithms read my mind, I think. I have to say I don’t understand 2/3 of what you’re talking about when it comes to the equipment so I’ve taken 4-5 times the length of the video looking up stuff. Did I need to know any of this? Will I ever do any of this? No. I’m a Navy flight test engineer so I’ll never need any of the skills. But the next movie I watch I’ll have enough to be able to appreciate what the artists have done visually and technically. Thanks for helping me learn something new every day! Cheeers!
I can relate to you so much. Mechanical Engineer here but I do delve into film-making myself. But the level he goes into and the level cinematographers go to create a half a second scene is simply amazing. Definitely gives you a new perspective and respect for the hard work.
This is good stuff, man!! I’m not a lighting rig guy or a film guy and yet this is really well done and engaging for a passerby such as myself. Subbed a few videos back, glad I found ya, keep it up!! Shit, and thanks!
This is so appreciated! The fact that you found the video entertaining, even if you’re not deeply into cinematography and filmmaking, really makes my day! Thanks for the support :)
please make this a series!! i love behind the scenes content, and your explanations on all these are amazing also i didnt personally like oppenheimer, but that last in cam effect is so simple and powerful, its great
Good stuff my man! Really interesting and informative breakdowns. As a photographer I find it Interesting to see how the big pro's do lighting setups for film. And yes - you should do a series on this.
This video gave me more respect for directors, actors and the people who run the lights. The amount of logistics and angels you have to work with to make this work is amazing, and acting with all those lights in your face must be hard. Brad was Driving almost blind lmao
Love the way you dissect shots and try to break down the out how and why. I think the same way, so it’s nice to find somebody like myself. It’s good work! Thank you!
I have no idea why the algorithm suggested this, but wow, this was fascinating. Great work, and thanks for going into such detail. There is a zero percent chance I ever use it, but it's cool to know how these things are done anyway.
Nolan's in-cam work reminds me of photographs by the late Brian Griffin, the one who made the first four Depeche Mode cover photos. His work was insane. Dig out his work like the b&w photo of King Sunny Ade which are just three exposures of tungsten light, one with knicker elastic being pulled towards the camera and vibrated. Another of my favourite was the cover of Psychedelic Furs album where he took different exposures on the same frame using a lattice of squares and moving them one unit of length for the next shot.
I’m so sorry for the following bad joke. When you mentioned the photographer I said to myself “I didn’t know Peter Griffin’s dog Brian was a photographer”. I’ll see myself out. No disrespect meant to the photographer because I looked up your suggestions and they were amazing.
@@kaptainkaos1202 hahahah, yes, googling for Brian was never an easy task :D He could've used an additional letter like Brian K. Griffin or something :D
Fantastic content and production. Have always been fascinated with these behind-the-scenes techniques and am glad I came upon your channel - subscribed
I'm a photographer and love to be inspired by movies and how they were made. I'm a strong believer in interdisciplinary observations! Thanks for a great and very informative video 👏🏻
I had pretty much taken for granted that everything was digitally recorded then processed "in post" these days, but I'm no expert as to movie making. Looks like using film is a damned expensive methodology, but it does look pretty great!
Thanks for that overview😊 I own an OG for some days now and try to learn everything about that camera. There is always something new I haven‘t recognised yet. Love your style! Thanks a lot!
background shake fx is a well known trick used in theaters, street festivals and raves. basically it is mapping. theres a whole art form around it which is decades old. check it out if never new. e.g. Harry Potter and a Cursed Child stage production on Broadway uses this a lot.
8:20 I think you should have taken the picture of the background from the exact position you were planning to have the projector later. And obviously you should use a projector that has optical lens shift that allows the image to be projected straight forward (making it reverse of your camera). For best results, you should have the optical plane of the camera at the same position your projector panel or DLP chip is in the final projection. Great video and you explained the techniques really well!
I love how dark those night time LA shots were of him riding with Bob Seger on the radio. When I think of that era I think about all the 60s home movies I've seen and how dark they were because of cheap stock and/or people weren't too educated on lighting while filming.
Watching your video got me buzzing about straight visual effects, as Henry mentioned in his comment, about how Chris Nolan chooses physical effects over CGI. It reminded me of all the great visual effects in the early years of film. Buster Keaton's work in the silent era was blocked from distribution, I believe until the late 1970s. A couple of generations never saw what made his work so great. "Safety Last" was one of, if not the best work he did. I offer this link which is a "behind the curtains" view of how some of his most iconic works were developed and filmed. This one in particular has always been terrifying to me. I was duped like audiences a hundred years earlier: we all assumed, as Keeton normally did, that all of this was indeed filmed twelve stories up and Keeton was doing the high work without safety harnesses, which I assumed was another layer of the gag. I'd feel let down to find out that he wasn't working as high as I believed if it wasn't for fooling me the way he and his crew pulled the wool over so many eyes. I think everyone will enjoy this: ruclips.net/video/ZifbxtLXy1I/видео.htmlsi=3HlkflSkzikzqq2F
First timer in your world--very nice work, Jimmy! You, too, jam enough information to make me go back and listen/watch/read (I'm on the deaf side)! I've always been a sponge for new information. Now that I have taken my old pro-self jacket and tie off, let my hair grow, and let my inner hippie out, life is smoother. Or, at least, if things don't work out, it's my bad. Gosh, how I hated watching a job fail, know why but everyone else was busy covering their butts rather than keeping their eyes on the prize. High five and belly bumps! I loved training! It's amazing what you can do when you teach people to fish, huh?
Big thing i notice with the diffused lighting inside cars especially is that it always makes the actors seem to be driving in front of a green screen. with the LED volume lighting it looks much more natural as if shot at location even if done indoors
I only watched “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” for the first time a couple years ago, and it quickly became a favourite of mine. I was a pre-teen in ‘69 and it was gratifying to see Manson and his sick puppies get their comeuppance in this alternate version of reality.
Regarding the Oppenheimer "shake"; Not only do I love it when I see an extremely labor-intensive effect done practically when it could be done with a couple clicks of the mouse, but I love it EVEN MORE when I see an effect so subtle I dismiss it as some three-click-of-the-mouse-CGI, and later find out it was done practically at way more expense, (whether it be $$ ,time, labor, etc.).
I love stuff like this which is why it's too bad DVD has gone the way of the dinosaurs. I miss physical media. I think the last great hurrah for behind-the-scenes footage was with Peter Jackson's extended trilogy box set. After that, I can't remember all that many films that went out of their way to document things the way he did. Not unless it was some short behind-the-scenes thing done as a promo. Actually, Disney+ has some behind-the-scenes stuff but then that's more about having content. If you watch their BtS material it's nowhere near as in-depth as that stuff or even videos like yours. Also, thanks for showing the highway lighting rigs. I've always wondered how they did lighting for big scenes like that. Imagine renting all those period-accurate cars just for most of them to be flash and they're gone appearances lol.
I don't think it's actually THAT cringe, given that you're getting additional content and knowledge to learn, prior that specific thumbnail content. Isn't it just like, -ok i have some bonus clips as well, but you can see it at the begining.' Additionally, the creator has very much well kept the chapters of the content that can be navigated directly in one tap.
Mate, you’ve got fingers and hopefully a brain, if you want to watch that part just skip to it, for the rest of us who actually wanna watch the video, your comment is not necessary or desirable. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
@@Loch_Ness_Lachster 68 people liked my comment. I guess we're not allowed to complain about losers click baiting and tricking people for more watch time on their analytics.
Great video, but come on man, use your lav mic as it was intended! I had problems making it through the video because I really can't understand why this is happening?
that last nolan in-cam trick is worth gold mines
That was so good. And his sniveling smile :)) as if he just smuggled Escobar's entire supply of coke or something.
very similiar to the fight club scene when Brad Pitt breaking 4th wall
the question is, how is the camera and projector position
That shaking background effect is amazing!
If you put the camera and the subject on a vibrator plateform it could be the same effect no ?
@@elliotverhaeren1945that would’ve made the actor look like they’re shaking too though. The point of it was the world around him was the thing shaking
I know nothing about directing. This gives me a whole new respect.
Tbh, directing is mostly high level stuff. Christopher Nolan isn't the one who comes up with ideas like this. His VFX Supervisor is.
then why come other directors don't do it@@GeneralKenobi69420
You should make a “how they filmed” video series
That’s a great idea!
@@jimmyonfilmyes please
@@jimmyonfilm I would like 10% of your revenue.
I turned on post notifications just so I don’t miss a pt.2
+1!
Yes please, I have on all notifications, hoping to see a series of this please!😊
Oh these are great overviews! Too often I feel like people do breakdowns that don't add much, but I like how you give detail about the effect the DP's choices have! I especially liked when you mentioned exposing night scenes more to print down (and thus get cleaner shadows). Apparently, between discussions and AC articles, rating high speed stock 2/3 to 1 stop slower is rather common. Andrew Lesnie (rip) did it and Cameron has apparently done it on a number of his films (I believe between his DPs).
This is one of the times RUclips algorithms read my mind, I think. I have to say I don’t understand 2/3 of what you’re talking about when it comes to the equipment so I’ve taken 4-5 times the length of the video looking up stuff.
Did I need to know any of this? Will I ever do any of this? No. I’m a Navy flight test engineer so I’ll never need any of the skills.
But the next movie I watch I’ll have enough to be able to appreciate what the artists have done visually and technically.
Thanks for helping me learn something new every day! Cheeers!
I can relate to you so much. Mechanical Engineer here but I do delve into film-making myself. But the level he goes into and the level cinematographers go to create a half a second scene is simply amazing. Definitely gives you a new perspective and respect for the hard work.
This is good stuff, man!! I’m not a lighting rig guy or a film guy and yet this is really well done and engaging for a passerby such as myself. Subbed a few videos back, glad I found ya, keep it up!! Shit, and thanks!
This is so appreciated! The fact that you found the video entertaining, even if you’re not deeply into cinematography and filmmaking, really makes my day! Thanks for the support :)
please make this a series!! i love behind the scenes content, and your explanations on all these are amazing
also i didnt personally like oppenheimer, but that last in cam effect is so simple and powerful, its great
Man this video really is top tier ! I need 10 of them to binge watch !
Thanks! I’m planning to make more of these :)
@@jimmyonfilm awesome !
New subscriber here! I am loving your videos Jimmy. They are sooooo good. The value you are providing to your viewers are immense. Keep going!
Good stuff my man! Really interesting and informative breakdowns. As a photographer I find it Interesting to see how the big pro's do lighting setups for film. And yes - you should do a series on this.
This video gave me more respect for directors, actors and the people who run the lights. The amount of logistics and angels you have to work with to make this work is amazing, and acting with all those lights in your face must be hard. Brad was Driving almost blind lmao
Love the way you dissect shots and try to break down the out how and why. I think the same way, so it’s nice to find somebody like myself. It’s good work! Thank you!
It’s crazy how many lights you need to make it look like nighttime
Fascinating and informative. Thank you.
We need more of these series!
Awesome content 👍🏻
Thanks man!! 🙏🏻
0:25 "arguably one of MY favorite movies ever". Who are you arguing with? Yourself?? Lol
I have no idea why the algorithm suggested this, but wow, this was fascinating. Great work, and thanks for going into such detail. There is a zero percent chance I ever use it, but it's cool to know how these things are done anyway.
I love learning how scenes are lit and then shot.
Love this behind the scenes technical stuff. Thanks!
Nolan's in-cam work reminds me of photographs by the late Brian Griffin, the one who made the first four Depeche Mode cover photos. His work was insane. Dig out his work like the b&w photo of King Sunny Ade which are just three exposures of tungsten light, one with knicker elastic being pulled towards the camera and vibrated. Another of my favourite was the cover of Psychedelic Furs album where he took different exposures on the same frame using a lattice of squares and moving them one unit of length for the next shot.
Great man, I’ll check it out! Thanks for the suggestion :)
I’m so sorry for the following bad joke. When you mentioned the photographer I said to myself “I didn’t know Peter Griffin’s dog Brian was a photographer”. I’ll see myself out. No disrespect meant to the photographer because I looked up your suggestions and they were amazing.
@@kaptainkaos1202 hahahah, yes, googling for Brian was never an easy task :D He could've used an additional letter like Brian K. Griffin or something :D
Fantastic content and production. Have always been fascinated with these behind-the-scenes techniques and am glad I came upon your channel - subscribed
This is the coolest video on RUclips regarding cinematography I have ever seen!. I learned so much in under 10 minutes.
I'm a photographer and love to be inspired by movies and how they were made. I'm a strong believer in interdisciplinary observations! Thanks for a great and very informative video 👏🏻
1:29 WHAT!? this set is mindblowing
New fav channel right here! keep going yo
Brilliant sir. Thank you so much!
I had pretty much taken for granted that everything was digitally recorded then processed "in post" these days, but I'm no expert as to movie making. Looks like using film is a damned expensive methodology, but it does look pretty great!
wow, projecting image like Nolan , that's cool. Thank you.
Thanks for that overview😊
I own an OG for some days now and try to learn everything about that camera. There is always something new I haven‘t recognised yet.
Love your style! Thanks a lot!
background shake fx is a well known trick used in theaters, street festivals and raves. basically it is mapping. theres a whole art form around it which is decades old. check it out if never new. e.g. Harry Potter and a Cursed Child stage production on Broadway uses this a lot.
The 200 stock with Panavision and Zeiss primes was immaculate.
WELL DONE!!! I hope the guys in L.A. are watching!
8:20 I think you should have taken the picture of the background from the exact position you were planning to have the projector later. And obviously you should use a projector that has optical lens shift that allows the image to be projected straight forward (making it reverse of your camera). For best results, you should have the optical plane of the camera at the same position your projector panel or DLP chip is in the final projection.
Great video and you explained the techniques really well!
Very cool video! Thank you for putting this together - keep up the great work
I love how dark those night time LA shots were of him riding with Bob Seger on the radio. When I think of that era I think about all the 60s home movies I've seen and how dark they were because of cheap stock and/or people weren't too educated on lighting while filming.
Watching your video got me buzzing about straight visual effects, as Henry mentioned in his comment, about how Chris Nolan chooses physical effects over CGI. It reminded me of all the great visual effects in the early years of film.
Buster Keaton's work in the silent era was blocked from distribution, I believe until the late 1970s. A couple of generations never saw what made his work so great.
"Safety Last" was one of, if not the best work he did.
I offer this link which is a "behind the curtains" view of how some of his most iconic works were developed and filmed. This one in particular has always been terrifying to me. I was duped like audiences a hundred years earlier: we all assumed, as Keeton normally did, that all of this was indeed filmed twelve stories up and Keeton was doing the high work without safety harnesses, which I assumed was another layer of the gag. I'd feel let down to find out that he wasn't working as high as I believed if it wasn't for fooling me the way he and his crew pulled the wool over so many eyes.
I think everyone will enjoy this: ruclips.net/video/ZifbxtLXy1I/видео.htmlsi=3HlkflSkzikzqq2F
your videos are always so informative
Thanks!!
Thank the film gods they're still shooting and releasing behind the scenes footage. Will be forever grateful until they day they stop.
8:43 This is the happiest I've ever seen someone for being wrong 😂😂😂
Cool video. The Nolan shaking effect was really cool!
The resuscitation of interest in motion film is amazing :)
First timer in your world--very nice work, Jimmy! You, too, jam enough information to make me go back and listen/watch/read (I'm on the deaf side)! I've always been a sponge for new information. Now that I have taken my old pro-self jacket and tie off, let my hair grow, and let my inner hippie out, life is smoother. Or, at least, if things don't work out, it's my bad. Gosh, how I hated watching a job fail, know why but everyone else was busy covering their butts rather than keeping their eyes on the prize.
High five and belly bumps! I loved training! It's amazing what you can do when you teach people to fish, huh?
Big thing i notice with the diffused lighting inside cars especially is that it always makes the actors seem to be driving in front of a green screen.
with the LED volume lighting it looks much more natural as if shot at location even if done indoors
I only watched “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” for the first time a couple years ago, and it quickly became a favourite of mine. I was a pre-teen in ‘69 and it was gratifying to see Manson and his sick puppies get their comeuppance in this alternate version of reality.
Hahaha great plot twist!!!
I would totally watch a deep dive video per film! What an awesome analysis
Thanks for all those infos, very interesting videos...keep up the great work Jimmy
This explanation of the lighting of the scene from The Killing was most interesting than the complete movie itself...
2:58 ah yes the signature Quentin Tarantino shot
Yeah definitely!!
Great stuff! Always love these “secrets revealed” videos!
Amazing video, very easy and pleasant to watch and absorb the knowledge
"But I was wrong." Awesome how well it worked without specialist equipment!
How did the background projection not fall on Cillian's face? Was it projected from an elevated angle?
love your channel, man you can never learn enough. Great camera hack at the end....
Regarding the Oppenheimer "shake"; Not only do I love it when I see an extremely labor-intensive effect done practically when it could be done with a couple clicks of the mouse, but I love it EVEN MORE when I see an effect so subtle I dismiss it as some three-click-of-the-mouse-CGI, and later find out it was done practically at way more expense, (whether it be $$ ,time, labor, etc.).
lol. 'cause Nolan doesn't heavily rely on CGI. sure.
very cool insight, so much to study from behind the scene alone
Speaking of Fincher, the Nolan shot also reminds me of the similar shot from Fight Club that was a combination of camera and visual effect.
Interesting! Which one are you referring to? I would like to check it out 😊
I’d love to see u talking bout Mann’s Ferrari driving scenes
That’s my problem too when buying a new film; first look at the behind the scenes and after that the movie. Sometimes a view the movie another time. 😊
This is amazing work, thanks for the research and informative video
Amazing content please upload more often your videos are top notch
Great vid, pls consider making this a series.
Thanks! Yeah it’s def something I want to do :)
That projector trick is pretty neat!!
..... "but I was wrong" - epic touch!
this was surprisingly interesting bro! good job!
Bro I like this vid a lot thx and keep going bro
I love stuff like this which is why it's too bad DVD has gone the way of the dinosaurs. I miss physical media. I think the last great hurrah for behind-the-scenes footage was with Peter Jackson's extended trilogy box set. After that, I can't remember all that many films that went out of their way to document things the way he did. Not unless it was some short behind-the-scenes thing done as a promo. Actually, Disney+ has some behind-the-scenes stuff but then that's more about having content. If you watch their BtS material it's nowhere near as in-depth as that stuff or even videos like yours. Also, thanks for showing the highway lighting rigs. I've always wondered how they did lighting for big scenes like that. Imagine renting all those period-accurate cars just for most of them to be flash and they're gone appearances lol.
"But I was wrong..." Love it.
Pazzesco sto video 🤩
Would it be possible for RUclipsrs to stop making the title and/or thumbnail the LAST part of the video? So cringe...
I don't think it's actually THAT cringe, given that you're getting additional content and knowledge to learn, prior that specific thumbnail content. Isn't it just like, -ok i have some bonus clips as well, but you can see it at the begining.'
Additionally, the creator has very much well kept the chapters of the content that can be navigated directly in one tap.
Blame RUclips. The algorithm wants to see engagement.
It's called click bait my friend 😂
Mate, you’ve got fingers and hopefully a brain, if you want to watch that part just skip to it, for the rest of us who actually wanna watch the video, your comment is not necessary or desirable. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
@@Loch_Ness_Lachster 68 people liked my comment. I guess we're not allowed to complain about losers click baiting and tricking people for more watch time on their analytics.
8:44 This made me subscribe w/notifications lol
I saw that cut at 1:44 nice 😎
Make this a series!!
Excellent video !
Big Fan from Pakistan ❤
I didn't know how complex their lighting sets are.
Very interesting stuff!
Wow! You really know what you are talking about!
Great video, but come on man, use your lav mic as it was intended! I had problems making it through the video because I really can't understand why this is happening?
Excellent analysis!
8:00 shaking was on the projector itself (unclear)
Clicked for Oppenheimer, but I thought that was the least fascinating part of the video 😬 The lighting stuff was much more interesting, in my opinion.
Very nice work dude!
I HAVE BEEN DYING TO KNOW HOW NOLAN MADE THIS SHOT!!
Definitely using it in my next project!
THANKS!
Yeah same! When I first saw the movie I was like: how the hell did they do that!
@@jimmyonfilm
Thanks for the informative video!
Thumbs up for thr bossa nova at the beginning. I learned a lot here, you should make it a series
Thanks man! Great suggestion!
Speaking of learning together, could we also learn how to use question marks at the end of a question?
Hi Jimmy. As a fellow g&e, this video is awesome!
2:58
Yep. It's a Tarantino movie.
Very educative
Fun video! More please!
Ha! 8:44 So devious.
Jimmy where can we see your portfolio, just wondering
Great video, however I would indeed argue that Once Upon A Time In The West is not one of your favourite films
The reason you like Once Upon is a issue with cinema, all about the visuals not the boring story
Not that I could gain access, but how are you able to see and study behind the scenes of movies?
I woulnd't mind if this where to become a series
Where can I find behind the scenes where they explain how they film stuff?
Nolan is such a hero for not succumbing to “dirty digital”.
Thank you for this vids
Great video!
Thanks Stefan! We’re actually in the same film emulation discord group from Nico hahah :)