It's me! I know Putin didn't blow up the pipeline. That was just an ironic reference to the pre-recording chat we had. My bad, sorry if it didn't come across like that. Everything else I said is 100% correct, of course!
@@SteveHall-w5k Batteries - stored wind power, solar power. As an alternative to nuclear/fossils. Big batteries. Where's the R&D to move the tech forward?
Someone should point out that the pump that shoves the gas along the pipe has a big plug on it that Vlad or the pump operator just needs to pull out. Okay that’s a fib. Alexa turn the pump off ( translated from the Russian) is all that was needed no deep sea diving no tonne of high explosives
@@hopethisworks1212 I have in the past stated certain truths , and suffered bans from doing so . We are still being censored by the Fascists , so I can agree with why it was stated .
It's me! I know Putin didn't blow up the pipeline. That was just an ironic/sarcastic reference to the pre-recording chat we had. My bad, sorry if it didn't come across like that. Everything else I said is 100% correct, of course!
I might be wrong or I might be right... but I'm surprised I don't hear so many more people just laughing in Keir Starmer's face when he says things like this energy plans gonna stop Putin? does he really think people are that fcuking stupid? Are people that stupid??
publicly-funded investment vehicle for private energy companies, just like they are changing the NHS to be a publicly-funded investment vehicle for private healthcare companies.
GB Energy will allow the upcoming Labour government to pretend Starmer is keeping the pledge on public ownership without having to actually nationalise anything. It will simply be another retailer among the multitude of other retailers, part of the current structure of the electricity market. What we need is for the electricity market to be restructured completely, but Labour isn't going to mess with privatised system.
My initial reaction to these new ideas by Starmer is to laugh and shake my head. But as the reality of the situation sinks in my laughter turns to tears.
Oh dear Crispin you need a higher calibre of guest than this man who thinks Russia blew up it's own pipe line usually like your videos can't like this one 👎🏻
It's me! I know Putin didn't blow up the pipeline. That was just an ironic/sarcastic reference to the pre-recording chat we had. My bad, sorry if it didn't come across like that. Everything else I said is 100% correct, of course!
It's me! I know Putin didn't blow up the pipeline. That was just an ironic reference to the pre-recording chat we had. My bad, sorry if it didn't come across like that. Everything else I said is 100% correct, of course!
its quite amazing that the uk has a free trade deal with the worlds largest producer of gas (lng) and its a commomwealth country australia what are they doing of course its a scam
Didn’t realise the Labour Party was HIS party. Thought it’s meant to be for all of us. Well he’s welcome to the party seeing as he’s petty much doing as he pleases, purging the left out filling in the gaps with his followers, while flushing socialism from Labour right down the toilet. It won’t end well for him or for the party karma will find him & his followers deal each of them with a heavy hand which I can’t wait to see. If karma can find the tories, then definitely will find those in Labour, who’ve turned into a party that’s not for us only just for them to further their political gains/power deal them with a heavy hand.
Because Andrew Marr is a toff establishment hack that was at the BBC for donkeys and now on mainstream LBC talk radio churning a slightly less worse presentation than at the BBC.
Have to say I thought much of what was said was pretty weak...certainly an economist....none of whom have had the ability to deliver good growth to the UK Keynesian or otherwise in the post war (granted until 1970 the UK was a better run economy...but only better...so thats a low bar). The notion that neoliberalism starts in 1979 is weak analysis...it fits with Thatcher demon but it misses the core changes which happened in the early 70s....none of which any economist can explain....they are the problem. No wonder he thinks Putin blew up the pipeline...shallow analysis. I do think the WPGB economic stance is very statist - an obession over getting power vs understanding institutional power. For an insurgent(party) this is obvously not useful...buy understanding you could learn how local victories could bring real power back to communities.....(more to follow).
The problem is as Glaziev (Russian economic developmentalist) says bureaucratic all think the same - here I would also include WPGB - and that the sanctions on Russia gave Glaziev & new defence minister position to overpower that class. This bureaucratic mindset is deep as it is embedded within our educational environment...economists being the worst.
It's me! I know Putin didn't blow up the pipeline. That was just an ironic/sarcastic reference to the pre-recording chat we had. My bad, sorry if it didn't come across like that. Everything else I said is 100% correct, of course! I've also written a book outlining the beginning of neoliberalism in the 1920s. 1979 was its incursion into the UK, which is what I said. Learn to listen better!
@@SteveHall-w5k My point is that Neoliberalism enters government under the Heath government..(obvs its roots are from Mont perlene, NAM, etc,.. from much earlier).10years before the Thatcher gov...this is important coz UK had a banking crisis due to these changes and suffered from inflation...this placed the economy in a very bad state and only one journalist - Nicholas Davernport was on the ball.
@@paulhamed2776 No, disagree. If my argument is weak, yours is barely alive. There was no 'banking crisis' but an initial influx of monetarist thinking into the UK banking system that relaxed credit controls under CCC and exacerbated the stagflation caused primarily by the OPEC oil prices rises - which bumped it up to over 25% by 1975 - and a currency crisis engineered by Healey, who had mysteriously arranged a currency swap with the US in July 1976. The IMF loan was entirely unnecessary and never drawn upon. Stagflation could have been avoided with a 10% subsidy on oil-using industries, price controls and adjusting sectoral balances. But they didn't do it. Neoliberal ideas had infiltrated the Labour Party and the bankers had always tried to subtly sabotage Keynesianism, but it wasn't full-blown neoliberal governance, which arrived in 1979 when Thatcher ditched Keynesian capital controls. Neoliberalism's roots aren't in the MP Society, that was a post-war latecomer, it's a lot older, emerging in the decline of the Habsburg Empire. All explained here. billmitchell.org/blog/?p=33307 billmitchell.org/blog/?p=33160 policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/the-death-of-the-left www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674244849
@@abdvs325 when maggie Thatcher sold off our gas and oil to the public ..the catch phrase was let's tell Syd. ..now starmmer is doing the exact same with our wind generation ..the outcome ...we are not the majority shareholders and .ownership will pass to other countries eventually ...screwed again.
What’s he a professor of Talking Nonsense? Germany was never “dependent” on Russian gas and halving the operational capacity of Nordstream by blowing it up when there are loads of routes from Russia is Nonsense. It takes literally seconds to look up the Wholesale European Natural Gas Price. I have no idea how anyone from the U.K. could make such a simple error.
5:13
Someone should tell the professor that Putin didn't blow up his own pipeline.
Yeah its hard to take anything he says serious after such a lazy take on nord stream.
Putin did it!!!!…….I am shocked anyone is still spouting this rubbish. Everything else he says could be tripe too.
It's me! I know Putin didn't blow up the pipeline. That was just an ironic reference to the pre-recording chat we had. My bad, sorry if it didn't come across like that. Everything else I said is 100% correct, of course!
@@SteveHall-w5k Batteries - stored wind power, solar power. As an alternative to nuclear/fossils. Big batteries. Where's the R&D to move the tech forward?
Someone should point out that the pump that shoves the gas along the pipe has a big plug on it that Vlad or the pump operator just needs to pull out. Okay that’s a fib. Alexa turn the pump off ( translated from the Russian) is all that was needed no deep sea diving no tonne of high explosives
whatever starmer pushes will be a scam!
Like Labour did with Schools and Hospitals under Blair.
The country will be saddled with Private debt.
And everything will go up in price.
Just another PFI scam
Now called PPP with WEF "stakeholder"
(profiteers) at its centre.
Stakeholder capitalism is the new PFI…
It'll increase their donors bank balances
Socialised risk…privatised profits.
Man should be the leader of the Tory Party.
He is, isn’t he, at least the Tory B Team.
It was the West IE US/UkNorway and Sweden who blew up Nord Stream 2 pipeline not the Russians.
They were both being sarcastic. Why would Russia shoot itself in the foot? Why wouldn't the UK and the US want to destroy it?
Quite.
It was the yanks
@@hopethisworks1212 I have in the past stated certain truths , and suffered bans from doing so . We are still being censored by the Fascists , so I can agree with why it was stated .
It's me! I know Putin didn't blow up the pipeline. That was just an ironic/sarcastic reference to the pre-recording chat we had. My bad, sorry if it didn't come across like that. Everything else I said is 100% correct, of course!
Starmer if putting Israeli lobbyists in all positions possible.
Wait, you mean Luke Akehurst ISN'T a quality candidate?
I might be wrong or I might be right...
but I'm surprised I don't hear so many more people just laughing in Keir Starmer's face when he says things like this energy plans gonna stop Putin?
does he really think people are that fcuking stupid?
Are people that stupid??
They are that stupid. Sadly.
Yes sadly.
I agree. They constantly insult our intelligence
Yes. If they vote lie our.
i am sure GB energy was a company that went bust years ago
The irony of the kids starver moaning about Putin
publicly-funded investment vehicle for private energy companies, just like they are changing the NHS to be a publicly-funded investment vehicle for private healthcare companies.
Starmer and Reeves don't fool us.
But there's a good chance they'll fool enough people to get them into office.
GB Energy will allow the upcoming Labour government to pretend Starmer is keeping the pledge on public ownership without having to actually nationalise anything. It will simply be another retailer among the multitude of other retailers, part of the current structure of the electricity market. What we need is for the electricity market to be restructured completely, but Labour isn't going to mess with privatised system.
Sometimes you don't know whether to laugh or cry..
My initial reaction to these new ideas by Starmer is to laugh and shake my head. But as the reality of the situation sinks in my laughter turns to tears.
We are laughing yet crying inside.
Anyone thinking of voting labour or conservative at this election needs to see a psychiatrist because they need help.
Anyone voting for a candidate who is a friend of izrayhell is complicit in genocide.
Ed Miliband talking rubbish again.
Starmer talks the same sort of trash as a once upon a time Austrian put out.. Voting Starmer will finish UK as will Reform run by elderly big mouths
Oh dear Crispin you need a higher calibre of guest than this man who thinks Russia blew up it's own pipe line usually like your videos can't like this one 👎🏻
Exactly well said .Truth is UK is controlled by their pals across the sea This man is as boring as Nigel .
It's me! I know Putin didn't blow up the pipeline. That was just an ironic/sarcastic reference to the pre-recording chat we had. My bad, sorry if it didn't come across like that. Everything else I said is 100% correct, of course!
Wasn't the privatisation of GPS services some sort of pfi hub invented by labour???
Milliband is truly pathetic.
Read "Vulture Capitalism" by Grace Blakley for a more detailed analysis.
Starmer's gonna take on Putin.....Oh Sweet Jeeesus, give my beating heart a break!
😅
It's me! I know Putin didn't blow up the pipeline. That was just an ironic reference to the pre-recording chat we had. My bad, sorry if it didn't come across like that. Everything else I said is 100% correct, of course!
My comment about wooden stamer.i want to correct I would no way vote for him
Starmer is the scam
its quite amazing that the uk has a free trade deal with the worlds largest producer of gas (lng) and its a commomwealth country australia what are they doing of course its a scam
Its Larry Finks Blackrock PPP (Public Private Partnership) aka corporate facism with our tax money
Green? Energy
A single wind turbine, can contain 335 tons of steel, 4.7 tons of copper, 3 tons of aluminum and 700-plus pounds of rare earth minerals.
Didn’t realise the Labour Party was HIS party. Thought it’s meant to be for all of us. Well he’s welcome to the party seeing as he’s petty much doing as he pleases, purging the left out filling in the gaps with his followers, while flushing socialism from Labour right down the toilet.
It won’t end well for him or for the party karma will find him & his followers deal each of them with a heavy hand which I can’t wait to see. If karma can find the tories, then definitely will find those in Labour, who’ve turned into a party that’s not for us only just for them to further their political gains/power deal them with a heavy hand.
I can tell you for certain from someone who works in energy the Labour manifesto on energy is total bollocks...it's pie in the sky stuff.
What a joke!!!
Starmer sounds like a Dalek and has about as much integrity.
I can imagine him saying "exterminate" in my head now. Which he ironically is doing to the Palestinians in Gaza.
Great program!
Why is it not the Andrew Marr Show ?
Because Andrew Marr is a toff establishment hack that was at the BBC for donkeys and now on mainstream LBC talk radio churning a slightly less worse presentation than at the BBC.
Steve kidda lay off with the posh geordie routine . Speak proppa man
hadaway and shite ya tossa
Have to say I thought much of what was said was pretty weak...certainly an economist....none of whom have had the ability to deliver good growth to the UK Keynesian or otherwise in the post war (granted until 1970 the UK was a better run economy...but only better...so thats a low bar). The notion that neoliberalism starts in 1979 is weak analysis...it fits with Thatcher demon but it misses the core changes which happened in the early 70s....none of which any economist can explain....they are the problem. No wonder he thinks Putin blew up the pipeline...shallow analysis. I do think the WPGB economic stance is very statist - an obession over getting power vs understanding institutional power. For an insurgent(party) this is obvously not useful...buy understanding you could learn how local victories could bring real power back to communities.....(more to follow).
The problem is as Glaziev (Russian economic developmentalist) says bureaucratic all think the same - here I would also include WPGB - and that the sanctions on Russia gave Glaziev & new defence minister position to overpower that class. This bureaucratic mindset is deep as it is embedded within our educational environment...economists being the worst.
It's me! I know Putin didn't blow up the pipeline. That was just an ironic/sarcastic reference to the pre-recording chat we had. My bad, sorry if it didn't come across like that. Everything else I said is 100% correct, of course! I've also written a book outlining the beginning of neoliberalism in the 1920s. 1979 was its incursion into the UK, which is what I said. Learn to listen better!
@@SteveHall-w5k My point is that Neoliberalism enters government under the Heath government..(obvs its roots are from Mont perlene, NAM, etc,.. from much earlier).10years before the Thatcher gov...this is important coz UK had a banking crisis due to these changes and suffered from inflation...this placed the economy in a very bad state and only one journalist - Nicholas Davernport was on the ball.
@@paulhamed2776 No, disagree. If my argument is weak, yours is barely alive. There was no 'banking crisis' but an initial influx of monetarist thinking into the UK banking system that relaxed credit controls under CCC and exacerbated the stagflation caused primarily by the OPEC oil prices rises - which bumped it up to over 25% by 1975 - and a currency crisis engineered by Healey, who had mysteriously arranged a currency swap with the US in July 1976. The IMF loan was entirely unnecessary and never drawn upon. Stagflation could have been avoided with a 10% subsidy on oil-using industries, price controls and adjusting sectoral balances. But they didn't do it. Neoliberal ideas had infiltrated the Labour Party and the bankers had always tried to subtly sabotage Keynesianism, but it wasn't full-blown neoliberal governance, which arrived in 1979 when Thatcher ditched Keynesian capital controls. Neoliberalism's roots aren't in the MP Society, that was a post-war latecomer, it's a lot older, emerging in the decline of the Habsburg Empire. All explained here. billmitchell.org/blog/?p=33307 billmitchell.org/blog/?p=33160 policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/the-death-of-the-left www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674244849
Rubbish it will be great.
Ooh yea ..let's tell Syd.
Why?
@@abdvs325 when maggie Thatcher sold off our gas and oil to the public ..the catch phrase was let's tell Syd. ..now starmmer is doing the exact same with our wind generation ..the outcome ...we are not the majority shareholders and .ownership will pass to other countries eventually ...screwed again.
What’s he a professor of Talking Nonsense? Germany was never “dependent” on Russian gas and halving the operational capacity of Nordstream by blowing it up when there are loads of routes from Russia is Nonsense. It takes literally seconds to look up the Wholesale European Natural Gas Price. I have no idea how anyone from the U.K. could make such a simple error.
YOU MEAN LIKE STARMER, THE SCAM.!!!!!!