Thay normally take the aircraft off when she is going in to port, even in Portsmouth. No idea why. Did come back into Portsmouth for a couple of days with aircraft on the deck, it was quite impressive.
@@ispi_video_photo It took days of preparation and planning to get that F35B off the ship in Portsmouth. They pushed back the dockyard workers a long way before it could take off. The only reason they would leave aircraft on the ship in port is because they can't fly to a shore base.
Great footage there, thank's for sharing. It's impressive watching this lady arrive and leave. Always draws a big crowd in Portsmouth and Gosport and makes it difficult to find a good place to film.
Yeah I know what you mean. There is a few good places in Liverpool to watch her moving, the hardest is getting from one place to the next. Nice to catch her turning in the river. And thanks appreciate it 👍
@@glynnwright1699 The carrier was designed specifically to operate the F35B so what is the point of a £3,000,000,000 warship if you think it is too risky to embark the aircraft she was designed to carry?
Is anyone else worried how easily a simple scanner seems to be picking up British Navel communications from our flagship. This is just me going of the vid not sure if the communications you can hear in the vid are real but ya still worrying like LOL
Aircraft carriers never have aircraft o9n board when in home ports (unless its an emergency). I really don't get why people keep banging on about 'no aircraft' when a ship like this has a whole sequence of training serials to work through after a refit and aircraft on board are just not needed.
Did it not occur to you that maybe, just maybe, they would be stored in the hanger deck when not in use? They would only be brought up to the flight deck when they are about to be flown off the carrier.
@@merseyshipping4494 Well its actually 8 years since she was floated up, she has been across the Atlantic and back twice and to the Pacific and back. She is a working ship.
Bigger than what? the QE Class is the 2nd largest carrier in the world, is 65,00 tons and only 150 feet shorter (in the bow) than a Nimitz. Her flight deck is also wider than a Nimitz.
@@pfcajwatkins Oh do I? If I was wrong you could have shown where but you didn't. Because its easier to throw an accusation than do the work and provide detail. So answer me this: Where was I wrong in any part of that statement?
@@1chish the USS Gerald R Ford is longer, wider, taller and carries more aircraft and crew. All I was saying is that I thought it was going to be bigger and nuclear powered due to the fact that the UK is one of the leading sea fairing nations in NATO. That is all not picking a fight or anything I just thought your carrier’s were as big as the United States carrier’s.
@@pfcajwatkins OK well I never mentioned crew or aircraft because that isn't 'size'. But as you mention the Ford that is basically an updated Nimitz hull and I was treating the US Carriers as the biggest (which they are) and therefore the two QEs are 2nd largest. In both metrics you mention the QE is still 2nd to Ford / Nimitz. The Ford displaces 100,000 tons similar to a Nimitz. QE is actually 70,000 tons all up but still 2nd by a big margin as I said. The Ford is the same length @ 1,092 Ft as a Nimitz. The QE is 920 Ft The Ford is 256 Ft Beam, Nimitz is 252 Ft Not sure you can call 'taller' just because it has a big Christmas Tree on the Island. The QE island structures are similar to a Nimitz or Ford structure. As for being nuclear power the UK decided there is no strategic or tactical advantage to a nuclear powered carrier. None. They still need RAS for aircraft fuel, victualling and weapon replacement so a stores ship is always in the CSG just like in a UK CSG. And they are the slowest ships. And when you add in costs there is simply no justification to a country that does not spend $760 Bn a year on defence. The US Congress did a report back in 1998 and in today's money the extra costs per each ship life of nuclear power is $12 Bn (plus decommissioning) above conventional power. Then we get build costs. We built two state of the art carriers for $10 Bn and they both work as designed and have sailed around the world. The Ford cost $18 Bn and to date doesn't work as designed (but knowing the 'can do' attitude of Americans it will get sorted). For a nation 1/5th the size of the USA we punch above our weight.
I wish my message reaches Elizabeth, no demon will be cunning to the fall of your state. Watch out for internal and foreign politics, not to interfere in the war, because your state will be destroyed by wisdom and your politics will be peaceful. My message is delivered to you
Ehh... Liverpool? What's the crisis in Liverpool? Ah it's the safest place on Earth may be? Go to Black Sea, you should loan it to Ukraine! Or come over here, South China Sea.
Brilliant, Royal Navy has a special place in Liverpool’s heart. Great job by the tugs of the Mersey, how many years seafaring experience………..💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽
UK has the most awesome tugboats, good job!
Saw it yesterday.. its well worth seeing. You feel the engines on your chest
Iconic Liverpool with the biggest Royal Navy ship ever made.
It doesn't seem like two minutes ago that I had the pleasure of boarding HMS Prince of Wales when she visited Liverpool.
What a fantastic ship! Looks fitting against the Liverpool skyline and the Liver building!
Shame no aircraft on the aircraft carrier though.
Yeah it is, hopefully next time
Thay normally take the aircraft off when she is going in to port, even in Portsmouth. No idea why. Did come back into Portsmouth for a couple of days with aircraft on the deck, it was quite impressive.
@@ispi_video_photo That's something I'd love to see! I've heard while in port the jets go back to RAF Marham.
@@merseyshipping4494 Hopefully!
@@ispi_video_photo It took days of preparation and planning to get that F35B off the ship in Portsmouth. They pushed back the dockyard workers a long way before it could take off. The only reason they would leave aircraft on the ship in port is because they can't fly to a shore base.
Seen her yesterday absolutely beautiful 😍
The people in L1 tower blocks must have an amazing view
Oh yeah, be great view. Overlooking it
She's a Big Ol Tub, HMS Ocean was a pretty big but looks like a destroyer in size compared to this
Amazing looking forward to seeing it on Saturday
Cheers. Sure you will love it
Great footage there, thank's for sharing. It's impressive watching this lady arrive and leave. Always draws a big crowd in Portsmouth and Gosport and makes it difficult to find a good place to film.
Yeah I know what you mean. There is a few good places in Liverpool to watch her moving, the hardest is getting from one place to the next. Nice to catch her turning in the river. And thanks appreciate it 👍
Great video. It must have been a fantastic sight to see.
Cheers. Yes it was, brilliant. Here for a few days
Super, flight decks built across the Mersey at Camell laird
I actually got to go on board on Friday with cadets and it is so good
Nice one
glad to see the militery mobilising to take down purple aki
Great sight to see
Indeed
Fearsome
Super little video. Looked like perfect filming conditions.
May I please ask if you know what time roughly her crew will cast off on Monday?
i believe its around 9am in the morning with the tide.
Would look a lot more impressive if she had some aircraft but that’s what 30 years of defence cuts does for you!!
Exactly
Or they are in the hanger deck
@@tobyzorn4674 Nice idea but if she had any they would be on show. Reality is we only have a hand full and the RAF are using them in Eastern Europe.
@@nigelappleton2963 It is supremely stupid to embark them to a carrier when they are much better protected on a shore base.
@@glynnwright1699 The carrier was designed specifically to operate the F35B so what is the point of a £3,000,000,000 warship if you think it is too risky to embark the aircraft she was designed to carry?
Is anyone else worried how easily a simple scanner seems to be picking up British Navel communications from our flagship. This is just me going of the vid not sure if the communications you can hear in the vid are real but ya still worrying like LOL
Still strange to see two islands on a carrier.
HMS Portland is at Mayport, Florida and is painted in haze gray What's with the pea green?
Harder to spot from a distance, at sea.
She would look nice with a few Lockheed Martin F-35 jets sitting on deck.
Defo would
Why exactly? She in a home port and she is on post refit work up and training ...
🤦♂🤦♂
Doesn't she look impressive?
Did anyone else notice the guy up forrard by the Jackstaff manning the gun?
I wonder. If not they'll be looking now haha
Would’ve looked a lot better if it had a few aircraft on the deck still an awesome ship though
Yeah I agree
Aircraft carriers never have aircraft o9n board when in home ports (unless its an emergency).
I really don't get why people keep banging on about 'no aircraft' when a ship like this has a whole sequence of training serials to work through after a refit and aircraft on board are just not needed.
Did it not occur to you that maybe, just maybe, they would be stored in the hanger deck when not in use? They would only be brought up to the flight deck when they are about to be flown off the carrier.
it was only moored there an hour and someone had it away with the anchor did they not??
😂👍
Nutter by name ...........
Co to za anglosaski wynalazek?
“HMS Queen Elisabeth found on bricks with all wheels missing”
What wheels
Humphrey found with his trousers around his ankles, leaking mangoo out of his bumhole.
@@merseyshipping4494 Calm down!
Give it a catapult and get rid of the ugly ski-jump
Where are its planes.
It's Liverpool, probably see them on Kijiji by now :)
They are stored below the flight deck when not about to be used.
dont they have painters to cover the rust,looks shabby
It's only a new ship too
@@merseyshipping4494 Well its actually 8 years since she was floated up, she has been across the Atlantic and back twice and to the Pacific and back. She is a working ship.
I thought your carrier’s were bigger.
Bigger than what?
the QE Class is the 2nd largest carrier in the world, is 65,00 tons and only 150 feet shorter (in the bow) than a Nimitz. Her flight deck is also wider than a Nimitz.
@@1chish you need to recheck your facts
@@pfcajwatkins Oh do I? If I was wrong you could have shown where but you didn't. Because its easier to throw an accusation than do the work and provide detail.
So answer me this:
Where was I wrong in any part of that statement?
@@1chish the USS Gerald R Ford is longer, wider, taller and carries more aircraft and crew. All I was saying is that I thought it was going to be bigger and nuclear powered due to the fact that the UK is one of the leading sea fairing nations in NATO. That is all not picking a fight or anything I just thought your carrier’s were as big as the United States carrier’s.
@@pfcajwatkins OK well I never mentioned crew or aircraft because that isn't 'size'. But as you mention the Ford that is basically an updated Nimitz hull and I was treating the US Carriers as the biggest (which they are) and therefore the two QEs are 2nd largest. In both metrics you mention the QE is still 2nd to Ford / Nimitz.
The Ford displaces 100,000 tons similar to a Nimitz. QE is actually 70,000 tons all up but still 2nd by a big margin as I said.
The Ford is the same length @ 1,092 Ft as a Nimitz. The QE is 920 Ft
The Ford is 256 Ft Beam, Nimitz is 252 Ft
Not sure you can call 'taller' just because it has a big Christmas Tree on the Island. The QE island structures are similar to a Nimitz or Ford structure.
As for being nuclear power the UK decided there is no strategic or tactical advantage to a nuclear powered carrier. None. They still need RAS for aircraft fuel, victualling and weapon replacement so a stores ship is always in the CSG just like in a UK CSG. And they are the slowest ships. And when you add in costs there is simply no justification to a country that does not spend $760 Bn a year on defence. The US Congress did a report back in 1998 and in today's money the extra costs per each ship life of nuclear power is $12 Bn (plus decommissioning) above conventional power. Then we get build costs. We built two state of the art carriers for $10 Bn and they both work as designed and have sailed around the world. The Ford cost $18 Bn and to date doesn't work as designed (but knowing the 'can do' attitude of Americans it will get sorted).
For a nation 1/5th the size of the USA we punch above our weight.
I wish my message reaches Elizabeth, no demon will be cunning to the fall of your state. Watch out for internal and foreign politics, not to interfere in the war, because your state will be destroyed by wisdom and your politics will be peaceful. My message is delivered to you
Ehh... Liverpool? What's the crisis in Liverpool? Ah it's the safest place on Earth may be? Go to Black Sea, you should loan it to Ukraine! Or come over here, South China Sea.
Fuck'n Anglosaxons.
Chuckle... Probably the least pretty or graceful carrier sailing the seas right now.
It's not about being pretty or graceful. It's a warship not a cruise ship