Where Does Mass Moment of Inertia Come From? - Brain Waves

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 30

  • @brianart8700
    @brianart8700 4 года назад +4

    Easily one of the best physics videos out here. Thanks 👍🏻

  • @te_a_09_shrishail_biradar.75
    @te_a_09_shrishail_biradar.75 2 года назад +1

    This is one of the most clear and logical explanation I've ever heard please keep up doing good work sir

  • @MultiJamesman
    @MultiJamesman 3 года назад

    You start of the video with a fantastic explanation using simple logic and English. Bravo and thank you. It's amazing how this is possible and how many physics/math educators miss this totally.

  • @williamstryker6643
    @williamstryker6643 5 лет назад +1

    Love the Amazon pitch. Joking aside-intuitive progression and examples.

  • @wesleyfincher3208
    @wesleyfincher3208 6 лет назад

    Incredible, I could not find anywhere through a google search, why we use the integral of x squared, y squared, etc for moment of inertia. Thank you so much. I wish this was the introduction to moment of inertia is statics.

  • @guitarttimman
    @guitarttimman 6 лет назад +1

    Yet another way to come up with I is to look at the circular analog of kinetic energy and replace appropriate variables and define I.
    KE = 1/2mV^2. Replace V with omega * r and integrate dm over a region. Just define the mr^2 as a point mass of inertia and replace it with I.

  • @guitarttimman
    @guitarttimman 6 лет назад +1

    The tangential force is equal to mass times the velocity squared divided by the radius. Who remembers that v = omega * r?
    omega being the angular velocity. Etc. All of this is derived using the fundamentals of differential and integral calculus. About the only time things can get weird is when the accelerations aren't constant.

  • @ahmedibrahem9355
    @ahmedibrahem9355 4 года назад

    Explain the principal of Mass Moment of Inertia for a rigid body. Define the radius of gyration. How
    would you change the axis of moment of inertia? Prove your answer by necessary equations and
    graphs.

  • @upanddown7911
    @upanddown7911 8 лет назад +1

    Thank you for giving us so quality videos.

    • @purdueMET
      @purdueMET  7 лет назад

      You're most welcome. There are more on the way :-)

  • @guitarttimman
    @guitarttimman 6 лет назад

    torgue also equals FXr which is Fr sin(theta). Of course that will be the perpendicular component of the force, but if it's already perpendicular then we know we have Fr Sin(90) = Fr. F = moment/r.

  • @Johnvincentvivek
    @Johnvincentvivek 5 лет назад

    Sir Good morning. You are my teacher.

  • @islandmonusvi
    @islandmonusvi 4 года назад

    The rest mass Moment of Inertia is within the ‘zero’ Mandelbrot Set. The rotational Moment is within the Julia Set limited by the R=2 boundary.

  • @nkosanancube9200
    @nkosanancube9200 2 года назад

    outstanding

  • @frankdimeglio8216
    @frankdimeglio8216 2 года назад

    The ultimate mathematical definition of what is BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is F=ma AND E=MC2 (ON/IN BALANCE):
    UNDERSTANDING WEIGHT AS BALANCED AND INTERACTIVE INERTIA/INERTIAL RESISTANCE:
    Define “mass”. You cannot. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Weight ultimately pertains to and involves what is BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. E=mc² is F=ma. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (Weight necessarily pertains to distance in/of SPACE.) Gravity AND weight are characterized by electromagnetic/gravitational interaction. NOTE: “Inertia" is not properly defined AND understood. The new/correct designation is inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.
    By Frank DiMeglio

  • @guitarttimman
    @guitarttimman 6 лет назад

    Inertia is the analog to linear mass and it derived in a similar manner to how kinetic energy is derived. I actually attended Purdue back in the 80's, and I became an expert in math in physics in a period of about a month. I was really a strange looking guy back then, but prior to that experience, I was, believe it or not, a playboy hippie. Isn't that funny? Anyway, KE is derived by starting with a distance and taking derivatives and then integration to take the time out of the equation and express everything in terms of m, v, and distance which everybody represented with an S, and then applying Fig Newton's law ( I used to eat those during class. It was fun.) Really, yeah both energy and inertia are consequences of Newton's second law. If we're talking about linear, then utilize F dot S and use kinematics to show that F dot S equals change in energy in terms of mass and velocity. In an angular system you will utilize angular distance, arc length if you will, and solve in terns of theta in terms of the radius and the mass. After all, the inertia of a point mass is MR^2. Each MR^2 is replaced by I. That's your inertia for a point mass. To find the total inertia for a volume of a function, use the density function to manipulate the equation so that the volumes cancel and the R^2 and Mass are left over. That will sum up all of the moments over the region bounded by the volume.

  • @adammiszta
    @adammiszta 6 лет назад

    Love your videos!

  • @rahulpebb
    @rahulpebb 7 лет назад

    Hi professor, can you please explain about principal axis and area moment of inertia about principal axis and least radius of gyration. Thank you.

    • @guitarttimman
      @guitarttimman 6 лет назад

      Use vector analysis. I think it's weird how so many people know how to calculate the sliding force that will cause an object to freely slide down an incline, but most don't know about the impending force and the least force.

  • @msmssm9417
    @msmssm9417 2 года назад

    Thank you

  • @selvams7061
    @selvams7061 7 лет назад

    plz explain parallel axis theorem

  • @ahmedkamla2109
    @ahmedkamla2109 3 года назад

    Thanks 😊

  • @aaronmorris3347
    @aaronmorris3347 7 лет назад +2

    "you can get them on Amazon, trust me"
    Prime?

  • @guitarttimman
    @guitarttimman 6 лет назад

    sin (90) = 1.

  • @kevinmenezes8386
    @kevinmenezes8386 4 года назад +1

    "Turns out its not hard to understand .. " if you explain it like that. . .

  • @RobertoEmilioRomero
    @RobertoEmilioRomero 7 лет назад +2

    Force is not Mass/Radius ITS MOMENT/RADIUS!! :)