Great Circle Distance

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 апр 2013
  • Calculate the distance between two cities.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 79

  • @kushagrasingh4892
    @kushagrasingh4892 5 лет назад +17

    The best explanation ever given on great circle Distance

  • @whywouldyousaythat2648
    @whywouldyousaythat2648 3 года назад +2

    This video is amazing!! After researching for more than 3 hours, this is the first time I actually understand the topic. Thank you so much :)

  • @ChoonyNg
    @ChoonyNg 11 лет назад +3

    1 of the rare videos explaining a confusing concept. Thanks for the effort mate.

  • @NickDanzinger
    @NickDanzinger 4 года назад

    Been experimenting with lat longs and calculating distance in excel but I actually wanted to understand the formulas involved. This video was PERFECT! Thank you

  • @billfletcher5495
    @billfletcher5495 6 лет назад

    Good work explaining the concepts. I needed a refresher re ship travel.

  • @Ricky-Noll
    @Ricky-Noll 6 лет назад +1

    Thank you for this I need to turn this into a Python function and your explanation was so clear it set everything straight in my head

    • @cyriljacinth960
      @cyriljacinth960 4 года назад

      I also watched the video for the same purpose..Could you pls share your python code? (2019CH04574@wilp.bits-pilani.ac.in)

  • @zabairghafoor888
    @zabairghafoor888 3 года назад

    Just helped me while being on search for this for like over an hour !!!

  • @maninderbassi7864
    @maninderbassi7864 8 лет назад +6

    Thank you so much for uploading this videos...it is actually a great help for me for my math SL exploration project...once again thank you soo much...

    • @Kamtono
      @Kamtono 3 года назад

      yess, im also doing my math SL exploration on the haversine formula atm

  • @DevineOne
    @DevineOne Год назад

    interesting. Each degree is 60 nautical miles. Therefore 60x120.228 = 7213.68 nm. Converting nm to km = 13359.74 km. A bit closer to the real answer. Your final equation is the same to calculate the angle of a celestial object at a specific location and time. I've been learning celestial navigation formulas the past week so searching came across your video. Nicely explained.

  • @Anwell100
    @Anwell100 10 лет назад

    Thanks a lot, well explained and made complete sense.

  • @feelingzhakkaas
    @feelingzhakkaas 3 года назад

    Awesome and fantastic explained

  • @aarevalo49
    @aarevalo49 9 лет назад

    Well done. I enjoyed it.

  • @baloodh2000
    @baloodh2000 4 года назад

    Thanks for this video. Helped me visualize it.

  • @MnrHaycock
    @MnrHaycock 8 лет назад +2

    Hi, how do you calculate the +43.677 and the -79. 630? I cant seem to figure it out thanks

  • @veronicamaria96
    @veronicamaria96 10 лет назад

    really good video. really very helpful, thanks a lot :) cheers

  • @areteees
    @areteees 5 лет назад

    thanks for the upload man really helpful

  • @ahmedazzawi9950
    @ahmedazzawi9950 7 лет назад +3

    The radius of the earth measures the distance from the top most layer of the sky to the center of the earth. The distance from the ground to space is 100 km so you ought to subtract that from the radius of the earth when measuring the distance between coordinates, right?

  • @naveenkumarreddykona8096
    @naveenkumarreddykona8096 8 лет назад

    Thanks for THis I need it now i found a solution for my project :)

  • @khaliun11
    @khaliun11 8 лет назад

    Thank you SO MUCH!!!!

  • @spitfire757
    @spitfire757 10 лет назад

    Very helpful....thank you!

  • @emmanuellaballarin175
    @emmanuellaballarin175 4 года назад

    Merci from France !

  • @michaeliawilliams2162
    @michaeliawilliams2162 6 лет назад +1

    Thanks great explaination

  • @luis17julio
    @luis17julio 4 года назад

    Gracias amigo saludos desde Ecuador

  • @michschnitte5647
    @michschnitte5647 4 года назад

    very good explanation for my Math IA

  • @smitidhami8764
    @smitidhami8764 3 года назад

    Thanks for the helpful video!

  • @richardhill3405
    @richardhill3405 5 лет назад

    I like the Haversine formula myself.

  • @abcteam3121
    @abcteam3121 8 лет назад

    Hello ! Very usefull video but could you show all sin cos and arcsim calculations more presisely ?

  • @mrnarason
    @mrnarason 5 лет назад

    Nice video sir

  • @Rockkzzzz
    @Rockkzzzz 10 лет назад

    Thank you very much

  • @mohamednabil9509
    @mohamednabil9509 3 года назад

    really great toutorial thanks

  • @zabairghafoor888
    @zabairghafoor888 3 года назад

    is the first method also known as a rhumb line ??

  • @dharanaarora4201
    @dharanaarora4201 5 лет назад

    Thank you so much for uploading this! Keep it going!

  • @MrBenny5757
    @MrBenny5757 10 лет назад

    thank you very much

  • @sheetsha
    @sheetsha 3 года назад

    Wow....It's been hell of ride since all these years .....Almost ten years...Have seen lots of S curves with him....😇😇😇our little classified secrets....😘😘😘

  • @francescasavanco7108
    @francescasavanco7108 9 лет назад

    can someone tell me how to derive the central subtended angle formula? the one to get angle alpha in the second method

  • @kobhalt94
    @kobhalt94 4 года назад

    How do you calculate cos 107°? it give me a negative result of course.
    I have learned with positive numbers (so FAJS would be +26°)
    i get: d= 0.298 + (0.657 x -0.29) wich gave me 0.107
    cos-1 0.107 is 83.85
    83.85 x 60 gave me 5031nm
    5031nm x 1.852= 9318km
    it is wrong and i don't know why.

  • @shorn77777
    @shorn77777 9 лет назад

    great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @srvm7340
    @srvm7340 10 лет назад

    very helpful and thanx a lot

  • @reinerwahnsinn4158
    @reinerwahnsinn4158 5 лет назад +1

    I know that this video is 5 years old yet still:
    With the central subtended angle method, you are calculating alpha (at ~12:00).
    If I type in the excat same calculation into my calculator with the exact same numbers, I get 1.0405371666633325 instead of 120.228 which means everything from there on just gives me incorrect results.
    Why do I get a different result on that term if I do everything just like you do?

    • @gpost001
      @gpost001 4 года назад

      I believe the input has to be in radians. Change your calculator from degrees into radians and you should be able to get the correct answer. I had the same result as you and changing the mode resulted in the correct answer.

  • @stumbling
    @stumbling 7 лет назад

    Of course it couldn't be intuitive and use Φ for longitude and Θ for latitude. Phi and Theta are near enough pictograms of longitude and latitude, respectively! Screw the convention, I'm using them like that.

  • @fam.jacobs5019
    @fam.jacobs5019 8 лет назад

    As a teacher at the nautical acadamy I'd like to use this video in my lessons.
    (It's thát good)
    Is that OK with you?

    • @SpaceflightScience
      @SpaceflightScience  8 лет назад

      +Menno Jacobs
      Please go ahead and do so. I'm glad you found it useful!
      Which academy is this btw?

    • @fam.jacobs5019
      @fam.jacobs5019 8 лет назад

      It's the Nautical college in The Netherlands

    • @giovannilieuw7299
      @giovannilieuw7299 8 лет назад

      +Menno Jacobs Ik vond het inderdaad ook een goede uitleg, meneer Jacobs.
      Could you explain what the difference is between using the formula explained in the video and the haversine formula? Thank you in advance! Future engineering student.

  • @TrungNghiaDUONG
    @TrungNghiaDUONG 9 лет назад +1

    alpha is 1.1431 (rad). Convert to degree = 1.1431 * 180 / 3.1415 = 65.496 (degree). Why is 120.228 degree?

  • @raedwahsheh
    @raedwahsheh 7 лет назад

    Why we took the longitude difference instead of the latitude ?

  • @syedabdultawab1669
    @syedabdultawab1669 7 лет назад +2

    hi i wanted to ask that why did you write West and South co ordinates in negative?
    will greatly appreciate a response

    • @heronimousbrapson863
      @heronimousbrapson863 5 лет назад

      That is merely one convention. East longitude is positive, west longitude is negative. Similarly, north latitude is positive and south latitude is negative.

  • @kinderjoker
    @kinderjoker 5 лет назад +1

    Off by about 900 km, but I forgive you cause you're trying to explain a lot in a short time and this number doesn't matter 😉

  • @viktordeclippel5991
    @viktordeclippel5991 10 лет назад

    what is a rhumb line?

    • @Bitter-Sailor
      @Bitter-Sailor 7 лет назад

      It's any course that maintains the same heading thusly cutting every meridian at the same angle.

  • @johnbcoolin
    @johnbcoolin 6 лет назад

    so the "equator is flatter than the rest of the earth"? because the "earth is not a perfect sphere" ok. makes perfect since

  • @VijayRajkhowa
    @VijayRajkhowa 8 лет назад +3

    Thanks, it was simple and ...gives more leverage to the flat earth

    • @lxmzhg
      @lxmzhg 7 лет назад +1

      more leverage to the flat earth? How so? It appears to contradict the FE.

    • @MGoudsmits
      @MGoudsmits 7 лет назад +5

      _.gives more leverage to the flat earth_
      omg what a moron

    • @CrazyPets0
      @CrazyPets0 5 лет назад

      What an idiot joke..

  • @michaelshen781
    @michaelshen781 3 года назад

    who's here from professor fink's class

  • @fepatriot
    @fepatriot Год назад

    How would you calculate the distance from Toronto to Johannesburg without using the assumption that the earth is a globe?

    • @marcg1686
      @marcg1686 Год назад +1

      Oh look, a mindless flattard who doesn't understand the implications that his stupid belief has for distances that are in fact verifiable.

  • @floofy764
    @floofy764 3 года назад

    i liked this video to get the likes to number "666"

  • @JoseMR2k11
    @JoseMR2k11 5 лет назад +1

    This is how you get people to believe in a spherical earth. Put up lots of math and equations explaining nothing. Theory and speculation with "math" earth is a fixed stationary plane

    • @CrazyPets0
      @CrazyPets0 5 лет назад +2

      Sorry, but this is how navigation of airplane and ship works. Remain in your flatardia

    • @tgstudio85
      @tgstudio85 2 года назад +1

      *This is how you get people to believe in a spherical earth*
      No need for belief here, as it works... always when navigating;)

    • @tgstudio85
      @tgstudio85 2 года назад

      *Theory and speculation with "math" earth is a fixed stationary plane*
      Math is like cancer to flattards like you.

  • @glennabarry1261
    @glennabarry1261 7 лет назад

    So your saying the earth is flat?

    • @MGoudsmits
      @MGoudsmits 7 лет назад +5

      no dumb fuck
      _So your saying the earth is flat?_ from which hole do you come crawling

  • @syashadeed7552
    @syashadeed7552 5 лет назад

    This is just flat wrong. Take a piece of yarn and a globe and you will see that international flight routes do not make any sense. The string on a globe will be LONGER following the known routes. It does work on a flat earth map.

    • @SpaceflightScience
      @SpaceflightScience  5 лет назад +1

      SYAS SYAS I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.

    • @tomnason1480
      @tomnason1480 5 лет назад

      Great circle calculations are for distances over 600 miles . . . your yarn is not 600 miles long therefore your analogy is invalid

    • @CrazyPets0
      @CrazyPets0 5 лет назад

      There is no any flat earth map...lol

  • @flatearthbanjo
    @flatearthbanjo 7 лет назад +2

    Sorry but according to NASA earth is a perfect sphere so all these calculations fall FLAT!

    • @philipfriis
      @philipfriis 6 лет назад

      Nope. I'm sure you are a troll - or maybe not - but in both cases you are completely ignorant and stupid.

    • @jaysdirtymusic
      @jaysdirtymusic 6 лет назад +1

      you should watch these videos ruclips.net/video/JgY8zNZ35uw/видео.html then you might see how stupid flat earth really is

    • @mickelson5589
      @mickelson5589 6 лет назад +1

      Flat Earth, Banjo, USA, Japan and Brazil if you have kids, i feel sorry for them lol

    • @heronimousbrapson863
      @heronimousbrapson863 5 лет назад +1

      NASA never said the earth was a perfect sphere.