who is we? and what about the Russians and Chinese are there space programs fake as well? you need to learn more about what is going on before you call the vast majority retarded
John Mcleveish Not really in business when companies are competing quality is also a factor. For example samsung and Apple can spit out a phone every years so they have to make sure each phone is better quality than the other and has more features. I'd rather have my competitors finish first and fail miserabley than them finish second and continue our toe to toe competition.
While what you say is correct, I think there is more to it. In order to develop the most efficient tech we're gonna make mistakes and fail but eventually the mistakes will lead to technological success (we're adapting off of our mistakes)... More competition only speeds up this process is in my belief.
Sado Plays Even if it raises 100,000 a month it still would be change compared to those satellite launches that pay them tens of millions (20-62 million per launch each WEEK or so compared to 1.2 million per YEAR) Doesn’t make sense and would only hurt their credibility with investors and make it seem like they REALLY need that small change of money...
yeah... just like he delivered on the falcon 9, or the hyperloop... or his subterranean metro for cars, he just rehashes ideas that were found obsolete several decades ago..
@@meatsaucez1516 well i guess with all this evidence you are presenting i am now deeply inclined to believe what you are saying must be true... you win this round in the youtube comment section. +1 internetz for you good sir!
matthew keissard The history of ideas like reusable rockets and the hyper loop isn’t that hard to find. Quit resenting successful people and do some real research.
JartaGames I don't know, the private sector continuously outperforms their better funded government counterparts. I mean it was only a week or so before the Wright brothers took their first flight that the US government declared that flight was impossible after spending spending in neighborhood of 10 times as much money as the Wright brothers did.
It is more like private vs private as NASA doesn't build its own hardware. This is more like old established private companies like ULA, Boing etc vs new space companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin. Public space agencies are vastly different. It isn't like every public organization is the same. NASA, ESA and the Russian space agency are quite different. It could be argued that SpaceX has had a lot of success by following a philosophy closer to that of the Soviet space program rather than NASA. I am detailing some of those similarities in these two articles: medium.com/@Jernfrost/most-interesting-rocket-engines-93b01af7ae4c medium.com/@Jernfrost/lean-software-development-and-soviet-rocket-design-10adf5b7a62e tl;dr both the soviets and spacex have stuck to simple designs like using the same fuel (kerosene) on all stages, multiple small engines rather than a few big ones, iterative development etc.
Very different entities. SpaceX is all about making launches cheap. NASA is about research and development. BTW the first 'A' in NASA stands for aeronautic... aircraft, not spacecraft. NASA does research into aircraft too something SpaceX has no interest in. NASA does the stuff for which there will be no commercial interest in. SpaceX will never bother with a flyby of Pluto or space telescopes or an orbiter around Vesta & Ceres. NASA blazes the trail and the private sector profits from commodity services and makes them cheaper and more efficient. Three cheers for NASA. Three cheers for SpaceX.
John Smith Did you just say that do little research on aircraft? Wow. Just wow... looks like you need a bit more research yourself. Don't start an arguemebt when you don't know a thing your talking about. Did you just say The Goverment is stealing our hard work? Oh God Help us all!
It's easy for NASA to get to mars but it's a one way trip and it's not worth human lives to study something we can do with rovers or on the moon. If they really want to they can use nuclear engine and liquid hydrogen fuel to get there in 70 days. The challenge is return to earth with enough Dealt V. because mars has 1/3 of the gravity and you have a payload of 16,000KG(that's what the falcon heavy payload is to mars) your going to need a rocket that weighs 474,000kg but the payload is 16,000. so every time you add more Dealt V the efficiency goes down as you have to add a extra 1/3 thrust for return. Edit: you could sling shot using the moon but with the rocket like falcon heavy or using nuclear engines they aren't designed for short powerful burns to change there parry apps to intercept with it to gain it's full potential. also to get them lining up it would make it very hard for you to rely on the moon and mars if you need a supply create at the mars station and improving risk of the colony staving or out of oxygen.
Elon Musk is sacrificing all of his luxury life,and is dedicated towards saving humanity from an extinction in the future by giving humanity access to Mars. That's called a real hero, a living Legend. Sir ELON MUSK.😀.
I don’t "know" what the future holds for NASA. But if we can land on Mars; we will be the golden generation of Human kind. The generation that left their home planet. And that is truly amazing
NASA embraces the private sector. Their focus is to be more on lowering the prices of space travel and commercializations, while NASA is more for the deep space and the actual scientific side of things like exploring more distant planets and things like the Hubble telescope.
SpaceX is efficiently managed and has its eyes set on one main goal. The same cannot be said for NASA which has its eyes on everything and requires 2 to 3 times the spending as private space agencies require for the same mission.
PandaTV Plus That's because it's NASA's job to be curious about Everything. Space X has been focussed on mars and that's what Elon Musk has tasked it with, unlike NASA which has been tasked with everything and so has to multi-task especially with it's budget to keep itself online with it's task of knowing and exploring everything.
Impressive but it missed mars orbit and is gonna get shredded by radiation and asteroids within a year or two so it’s just a waste of money. Although it was a brilliant marketing stunt for Tesla. NASA is currently exploring mars surface with the curiosity rover looking for water and possible future locations for human habitats/settlements. Which is really more impressive and important.
SpaceX launched the Tesla roaster into space to show that the falcon heavy can launch payloads near Mars. They we're not allowed to orbit Mars for legal reasons and they overshot a little bit but NASA has also had it's problems. You could say that the curiosity rover is the size of a mini Cooper and it landed on Mars, but the Tesla is bigger and heavyer. If they just do the same thing but replace the Tesla with a thing capable of navigating to Mars from where the falcon heavy sent it, it could get to Mars with a fairly large payload. Also landing on Mars is hard but comparible to the difficulty of landing on Earth the way SpaceX does it.
I don't see why we should put restrictions on what NASA should do. If both NASA and SpaceX are competing to get to Mars, that would speed up development of technologies to actually get them there. A thought I did have though was that it would be cool if NASA focused on colonizing Venus and SpaceX focused on Mars. Either way though, increased competition is for the best.
Neither is Mars in its current state, that's why there's terraforming. Obviously, we couldn't live on the surface of Venus, but there's been talk about putting floatables of sorts in the atmosphere of Venus where the temperature is much cooler.
The Joker 10259 Terraforming is hypothetical. Removing an amount of carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide that pushes Venus' atmosphere to 91 atm in such a remote space much closer to the Sun would be quite a feat. Even colonizing Mars would move us only about 1% closer to that (if not a decimal of that).
lordultor shut up idiot NASA, and space X aren’t really competitors they are partnering each other NASA funding space X. Should you rather have NASA waste taxpayers money or give taxpayers money to space X development
One of the most fantastic recent inventions was SpaceX's development of a rocket that could be reused, thus saving billions of dollars over time. I would say that currently, they would be the ones winning the public vs. private "space race". Let's hope NASA is able to do something to level the playing field, as they have become reliant on that same rocket to transport goods. Paying 130 million for each transport is better and cheaper than having to develop a rocket every time, which could cost billions.
10-20mil per launch isn't bad, but the same could have been accomplished with a focus on streamlining manufacturing. it isn't the time for rocket reusability yet, that'll come for its-scale launch vehicles
Thats the falcon nine I belive. The boosters land in a designated area. Because of the technology in them needed to land it, and the fuel needed to slow it down how ever, it can carry less fuel then a standard rocket.
per launch cost is fixed no matter payload size, and rocket is always loaded with max fuel. all reusability means is a lower max payload capacity, it doesn't mean it costs more
Really remarkable, indeed. Cause like, down here, sustentability is a choice, but in space it will be a fundamental necessity, otherwise we won't get farther than Mars, if even to Mars we get.
To be honest with you, people have more faith in SpaceEx because after NASA stopped sending rockets up here in Florida, SpaceEX has taken its glory. I still miss when I was a kid in elementary and middle school here in Orlando, FL and when NASA announced they would launch a space shuttle, the teachers would make all the kids go outside and watch the rocket leave Earth.
The Orion Capsule and SLS, Space Launch System, can vastly outperform the falcon 9 heavy in terms of thrust to weight and carrying capacity, NASA is a larger less nimble organization than SpaceX and has a much broader focus, however after over 100 manned and over 1000 unmanned missions currently has a 98%+ mission success rate, while spaceX has approximately a 93% launch success rate which is lower the industry standard, 95% success rate. In short NASA has vastly more experience, more funding, and given proper direction could easily transport humans to the outer solar system by the 2040s
Like the video said, NASA has been starving in terms of funding. Luckily, president Trump signed a bill giving about 20 billion dollars to NASA. I have a feeling that he recognizes the importance of our space program and is attempting to get it going again.
John T. Yes, I was going to say that President Trump's recent actions to revive the space program could bring new hope of a future with space exploration once again
ClashWith SKULL it was suppose to happen. But the amount of cut back it made to keep its stuff floating in space is way too much for them. They were suppose to go on a project name red dragon.
DarkLight even though it's private, it still is way behind on terms of foundation, where do you think space x launches its rockets from, its from NASA's launch pads. On top of that, they've never put a man in space before, Space X hasn't yet gone through the trial and error process that got NASA astronauts to the moon, such as the Apollo one disaster. Accidents are bound to happen, there will be setbacks, it's not all smooth sailing from here on out for you Martian MUSKeteers, colonization and even the basic exploration of Mars by humans is still farther away than many people think
Canada would win with a minor victory. If no allies are involved then it all comes down to population and manpower, Canada has double the people as Australia which gives them an edge. Besides that, both countries basically share all the same hardware and have near the same amount of all hardware. So if no allies are involved Canada wins. However, if allies were involved Australia would win. The USA would stand out of this battle but the UK would side with Australia, New Zeeland, Japan, India and China would fund Australia while Canada would be funded by nobody. That's because Australia and Canada both have amazing relations with Europe so they wouldn't get involved. These battles would be fought in air and sea and there wouldn't be any land battles because Australia is so inhospitable that it is basically impossible to invade and it is the same with Canada. Therefore after a few months with basically no damage to each others country, there would be peace, forced by the EU, Asia and the USA or even the queen could just say, "right you are no longer at war" and that's the end of that. Plus, both countries prefer peace over war so this war wouldn't be very interesting.
just 19 billion $ annual budget for NASA...that's nothing compared to their useless annual defense budget 664 billion $...NASA deserves better than this
then open your mouth and shout it instead of just watching the next state of the union and accepting. Or whatever it is they announce the new federal budget with. I am from netherlands. Same here in holland. Everyone complains, after which they say in a cool voice, "right, better get back to paying mny taxes". Bunch of pussies.
Remember that the first tesla was called Model S, the second Model X and the one after that was gonna be called Model E, but he postponed it and made Model 3 instead. Oh and did I mention Model Y? S E X Y
DynamicDan Oh, I see. My qualm is more around a human emotion which cannot be measured (only described) becoming divided into four basic words (angry; happy; sad; wow or whatever) on a social media site and these reactions then becoming something you actively associate and relate to various world events (some very deathly, and shoved in your face every time you "go for a scroll"), and I just think there's heaps of bullshit there just to get "Reactions" (a.k.a controversy in some ways), and social media (I'm really referring to Facebook mostly) to me is basically regular exposure to content designed to engineer your mind to consume (easy example is clickbait headlines and controversially styled news) and thus generate revenue. Its really a personal choice how aware of this sort of thing you are, and even then you have to be responsible for yourself and how often you use media like Facebook (suppose its like smoking in a way), etc and I apologize if I lost the subject matter, however it's just too much to type for for 4 am. Meh, it's only an internet opinion anyway and the truest communication is in the flesh.
NASA vs SpaceX is an incorrect way to think about the competition. NASA never developed space craft. NASA hired companies like Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft, North American Rockwell and Northrop Grumman to build the space craft. It is these companies whom SpaceX is in competition with, not NASA.
Husker54 Indeed. The two organizations need to work together. Help each other in situations. Since SpaceX wants to explore mars, they are in charge of that. While NASA and other space organizations take care of finding more planets, stars, asteroids that orbit bodies, etc.
Well people this has happened. On 6th February 2018 Elon Musk DID in fact launch a rocket and landed it BACK ON EARTH SUCCESSFULLY! the catch? The payload was his midnight cherry Tesla Roadster car and a mannequin, playing Space Odessy is left behind as it is on its journey towards Mars!
Space X (and the private sector in general) is almost certainly going to lead the way in colonization and utilization of space and space resources. NASA is, unfortunately, too bogged down by government politics and their own internal bureaucracy to make the cut
Gorilder yeah, private companies are the future in space, i imagine companies will be motivated to bring in resources from space to trade and that's how they will male their money
gedro7000 they dont have nasa budget but they are eay more efficient with their money, plus they plan on funding it with people buying tickets to go to mars
Last year at university I actually had to write a 25-page research paper about precisely this topic, comparing the private space industry to government-run approaches like NASA. During my research, I found a few sources that were compelling and labelled what you've mentioned in this video as SpaceX being the "direct approach" method, while NASA uses more of a "stepping stone" method. The problems with the stepping stones are that you can get bogged down and sidetracked at each step, possibly never reaching your end goal. And the problems with the direct approach is that if not enough safety is tested for you could end up reaching your goal but having suffered more casualties than necessary. In the end, I came away with the conclusion that the direct approach method was the best idea, as long as enough focus could be kept on safety. I'd rather have made it to Mars and suffered a few losses than never made it at all because of bureaucracy getting in the way of progress.
If only the US government would take half of the military's 600 billion dollar budget and put it into NASA we would have men exploring different solar systems by now.
It may be impossible to move faster than light, but bending space around a ship could, technically, make it travel at speeds faster than light. And their are solar sails that NASA is planning to send to other solar systems to take detail photographs at 15% the speed of light. They would take a while, but they would get there in time for our lifetimes to still be ongoing. And I believe you made a mistake as the closest star system is 4.3 light years away not 1.5 light years.
OhioansAreMyFavoritePeople True what you said about the star xD Yeah solar sails that can go up to 15% speed of light have been planned, the problem is the acceleration. The need to start very near the sun and use the acceleration in a straight line all the way across the solar system to get to that speed, which is incredibly hard to do
Do not forget that the budget they put into the army aims to defend the country and therefore defend NASA as well. It's not so easy to talk about budget because they also have to maintain their place as the 1st world power for many reasons that we do not even imagine. The development of the country in all fields, including space research, is part of it.
Imran El Mir Is there any realistic reason to believe anyone (except north korea) would attack to the US? They can keep their nukes but cut down on other parts of the military, the nukes only need a tiny fraction of the budget, and they would still be able to keep world peace with only them and like eight of their current army size or budget
so you're implying that DICE based their factions off of this knowledge? i mean, bf4 doesn't have any campaign missions that take place in space because thats call of duty
The major difference is profit motive. A private company operates on the profit motive. NASA, a government agency only spends what it needs to operate. SpaceX will continue to ask for more money as it needs to show its shareholders it is making ever increasing profits. In the long run SpaceX will be more expensive than NASA ever was.
Voyager 2 was launched first to space and then like 2 weeks later they launched the voyager 1 but it was sent on a different course that's why it has overtaken voyager 2
The difference is if nasa were to bring back the Saturn five. The falcon heavy rocket would be half as powerful. But yeah rn it is currently the worlds most powerful. Gotta love america. Fuck yeahhh
NASA should focus on exploring deep space and far ends of solar system like Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune and beyond And company like space x should explore the inner solar system like sun mercury venus earth and mars and beyond our solar system
I love the idea of the video and I'd love to see more space agencies comparissons. On the other side, the images for the video weren't the best (spacecraft, rovers and rockets had nothing to do with the real design most of the times). The most important thing about Tesla is that cars are electric, not that some of them can drive themselves for a while. As an "expert" (enthusiast) in space and Elon Musk's companies, I'd be more than glad to help with that kid of videos. Keep up the amazing stuff you guys do!
I think it’s good to have private sector, government sector and public sector working together but still separate entities. This will allow for advancement through competition with some shared goals and specializations.
We have been made aware that the SpaceX mission to resupply ISS are closer to $130 million.
first to reply to infographics
Thanks for the correction!
I was shouting at my telly 20 million is so cheap!!! but 130 million ain't bad either!
who is we? and what about the Russians and Chinese are there space programs fake as well? you need to learn more about what is going on before you call the vast majority retarded
nasa lies
The more space companies the better in my opinion. More competition means faster development...
I want to open a bar on mars and call it Mars bar.
Photonon Videos I agree
More competition can lead to more diasaters, as companies will be rushing out more innovations with not a lot of backing.
Photonon Videos Hope you sell hot beverages. I hear it's cold there.
John Mcleveish Not really in business when companies are competing quality is also a factor. For example samsung and Apple can spit out a phone every years so they have to make sure each phone is better quality than the other and has more features. I'd rather have my competitors finish first and fail miserabley than them finish second and continue our toe to toe competition.
While what you say is correct, I think there is more to it. In order to develop the most efficient tech we're gonna make mistakes and fail but eventually the mistakes will lead to technological success (we're adapting off of our mistakes)... More competition only speeds up this process is in my belief.
Mars is my city
Atlas - please no. Don't spread cancer here hahahha
Atlas - overused memes are your thing
dragonslayer f420 memes every day bro
Atlas - mars in my continent europe is my country England is my city London is my town
Atlas - Godchurch son?
SpaceX should have a patreon account
Sado Plays Even if it raises 100,000 a month it still would be change compared to those satellite launches that pay them tens of millions (20-62 million per launch each WEEK or so compared to 1.2 million per YEAR)
Doesn’t make sense and would only hurt their credibility with investors and make it seem like they REALLY need that small change of money...
They do have a patreon account
Sado Plays
I think the same!
pretty sure it's a joke lol
Patreon supporters couldn't come close to making a notable impact on SpaceX's funding.
Basically
Government vs Elon Musk
LOLWTF673 Im jelaous of him
more like a billionair with a high budget hobby
I want him to adopt me
LOLWTF673 Elon musk wins. He, unlike A CERTAIN COUNTRY isn't trillions of dollars in debt.
Lol
who needs notifications if youre always on youtube
lars vanhoof Ye boi
lars vanhoof you right
Nate Higgers Fuck you
lars vanhoof who needs Notification when your always on porn hub
Da,Taper ur not funny
Musk sometimes seems like a nutjob when announcing crazy ideas, but he keeps delivering. :-O
he will make space great again
yeah... just like he delivered on the falcon 9, or the hyperloop... or his subterranean metro for cars, he just rehashes ideas that were found obsolete several decades ago..
matthew keissard they weren’t found obsolete. They were deemed undoable. And Elon is proving everyone wrong.
@@meatsaucez1516 well i guess with all this evidence you are presenting i am now deeply inclined to believe what you are saying must be true... you win this round in the youtube comment section. +1 internetz for you good sir!
matthew keissard The history of ideas like reusable rockets and the hyper loop isn’t that hard to find. Quit resenting successful people and do some real research.
Elon Musk: Let's make space great again.
BWG itll be Elon Ivanka Musk Jr. who claims that thank you
it is already
BWG agreed
Yup
Haha
If Elon had the budget of NASA, he'd already be on Mars by now
Lorenzo Zarate Damn straight!
probably not.
Lorenzo Zarate or take 100b out of the military spending
Lorenzo Zarate He's damn smart, but that's physically not possible mate.
JartaGames I don't know, the private sector continuously outperforms their better funded government counterparts. I mean it was only a week or so before the Wright brothers took their first flight that the US government declared that flight was impossible after spending spending in neighborhood of 10 times as much money as the Wright brothers did.
I came here after watching SpaceX Falcon Heavy Launch.
Gamma Guy same here
Same haha
Same
Me too
RussianNemesis WOW....so many XD
Public vs Private?
tl;dr thank you
whats confusing
vs Protected vs Default?
Cipher Hex
exactly!!!! anything Private is almost always better!
It is more like private vs private as NASA doesn't build its own hardware. This is more like old established private companies like ULA, Boing etc vs new space companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin.
Public space agencies are vastly different. It isn't like every public organization is the same. NASA, ESA and the Russian space agency are quite different. It could be argued that SpaceX has had a lot of success by following a philosophy closer to that of the Soviet space program rather than NASA. I am detailing some of those similarities in these two articles:
medium.com/@Jernfrost/most-interesting-rocket-engines-93b01af7ae4c
medium.com/@Jernfrost/lean-software-development-and-soviet-rocket-design-10adf5b7a62e
tl;dr both the soviets and spacex have stuck to simple designs like using the same fuel (kerosene) on all stages, multiple small engines rather than a few big ones, iterative development etc.
Very different entities. SpaceX is all about making launches cheap. NASA is about research and development. BTW the first 'A' in NASA stands for aeronautic... aircraft, not spacecraft. NASA does research into aircraft too something SpaceX has no interest in.
NASA does the stuff for which there will be no commercial interest in. SpaceX will never bother with a flyby of Pluto or space telescopes or an orbiter around Vesta & Ceres. NASA blazes the trail and the private sector profits from commodity services and makes them cheaper and more efficient. Three cheers for NASA. Three cheers for SpaceX.
They're both about research and development. NASA just has higher budget and more resources whilst SpaceX has ambitions.
NASA is also a government agency, where they can do only limited things.
SpaceX is private, where they can do whatever they want.
Just to add on. :)
John Smith Did you just say that do little research on aircraft? Wow. Just wow... looks like you need a bit more research yourself. Don't start an arguemebt when you don't know a thing your talking about. Did you just say The Goverment is stealing our hard work? Oh God Help us all!
It's easy for NASA to get to mars but it's a one way trip and it's not worth human lives to study something we can do with rovers or on the moon. If they really want to they can use nuclear engine and liquid hydrogen fuel to get there in 70 days. The challenge is return to earth with enough Dealt V. because mars has 1/3 of the gravity and you have a payload of 16,000KG(that's what the falcon heavy payload is to mars) your going to need a rocket that weighs 474,000kg but the payload is 16,000. so every time you add more Dealt V the efficiency goes down as you have to add a extra 1/3 thrust for return.
Edit: you could sling shot using the moon but with the rocket like falcon heavy or using nuclear engines they aren't designed for short powerful burns to change there parry apps to intercept with it to gain it's full potential. also to get them lining up it would make it very hard for you to rely on the moon and mars if you need a supply create at the mars station and improving risk of the colony staving or out of oxygen.
Lenard Segnitz do u work at nasa or somethin boi?
Elon:i need funds...
Also elon:im gonna sell flamethrowers.
The moon landing happened before my lifetime but hopefully I will get to see a mars landing in mine
MrMathew same here!
Same
That'll be cool
same dude
apparetently it's not a proven fact that US landed on the moon - just saying. i am looking forward to the mars landing - SO COOL and moon landing too
Elon Musk is sacrificing all of his luxury life,and is dedicated towards saving humanity from an extinction in the future by giving humanity access to Mars. That's called a real hero, a living Legend. Sir ELON MUSK.😀.
Truly said bro
I wonder if they can plant trees there, even though it's pretty hot.
Exactly, he earns the least he is allowed to, earing the minimum wage of a California CEO
me: *I just want to see the space battleships and conquer xenos in space*
@@LooperEpic no it's impossible to grow trees on mars and it's actually very cold there not hot.
bruno mars is not from mars. : NASA' s report
They should send a famous flat earther around the moon. Their whole FES would be destroyed.
WONDERFUL IDEA!
I feel like NASA and SpaceX don't really care about the mentally challenged enough to send them to the moon.
OhioansAreMyFavoritePeople good one
True.
Legendary Amazing doubtful!!! They would come back with evidence that the moon is flat instead!!!
Meanwhile in another universe we're preparing to go to Earth
😲
Those Aliens will die from pollution
Twilight zone?
I don’t "know" what the future holds for NASA. But if we can land on Mars; we will be the golden generation of Human kind. The generation that left their home planet. And that is truly amazing
Reza Atabaki i dont what? Kid u need to learn Grammar.
TheChosen Human I* don't* you*
TheChosen Human Oh the irony is golden
yes, the generation that couldn't saved earth and ditched it. i wouldn't exactly call that golden...
noob168 what?
NASA embraces the private sector. Their focus is to be more on lowering the prices of space travel and commercializations, while NASA is more for the deep space and the actual scientific side of things like exploring more distant planets and things like the Hubble telescope.
Andrew Lynch are there 2 nasas?
UY Scuti he made a mistake
UY Scuti haha
Andrew Lynch NASA vs NASA. Polar opposites. Night and day.
NASA has 19 Billion annual budget while US army has 650 billion
smith tag and your point is?
Rocky is it not obvious?
Rocky to small budget
Rocky you really need your hand held to figure this out?
Hananah Banana yes I know... Still that's an absurd amount of money for a military
SpaceX is efficiently managed and has its eyes set on one main goal. The same cannot be said for NASA which has its eyes on everything and requires 2 to 3 times the spending as private space agencies require for the same mission.
PandaTV Plus
That's because it's NASA's job to be curious about Everything. Space X has been focussed on mars and that's what Elon Musk has tasked it with, unlike NASA which has been tasked with everything and so has to multi-task especially with it's budget to keep itself online with it's task of knowing and exploring everything.
Govt sectors will never be as efficient as a private sectors.
THE ANDROID GAMER nobody has sent humans to another planet
SiisKolkytEuroo thank you. the other guy is overthinking!!.
PandaTV Plus NASA has to watch everything in Space. It has to be sure we are safe from what is out there.
Do Pornhub vs. Redtube
What about Plumper Pass?
Doesn't Pornhub own Redtube though?
oooowwweeeeeeee
Twilight Shimmer i think its the other way, not sure tho
xvideos>
SpaceX just launched a car into space, i think that settles this discussion
Impressive but it missed mars orbit and is gonna get shredded by radiation and asteroids within a year or two so it’s just a waste of money. Although it was a brilliant marketing stunt for Tesla. NASA is currently exploring mars surface with the curiosity rover looking for water and possible future locations for human habitats/settlements. Which is really more impressive and important.
It proves nothing
CheekyWank space uber
Yeah but NASA landed on the moon and sent machines to Mars
SpaceX launched the Tesla roaster into space to show that the falcon heavy can launch payloads near Mars. They we're not allowed to orbit Mars for legal reasons and they overshot a little bit but NASA has also had it's problems. You could say that the curiosity rover is the size of a mini Cooper and it landed on Mars, but the Tesla is bigger and heavyer. If they just do the same thing but replace the Tesla with a thing capable of navigating to Mars from where the falcon heavy sent it, it could get to Mars with a fairly large payload. Also landing on Mars is hard but comparible to the difficulty of landing on Earth the way SpaceX does it.
I don't see why we should put restrictions on what NASA should do. If both NASA and SpaceX are competing to get to Mars, that would speed up development of technologies to actually get them there. A thought I did have though was that it would be cool if NASA focused on colonizing Venus and SpaceX focused on Mars. Either way though, increased competition is for the best.
Venus is no way inhabitable
Neither is Mars in its current state, that's why there's terraforming. Obviously, we couldn't live on the surface of Venus, but there's been talk about putting floatables of sorts in the atmosphere of Venus where the temperature is much cooler.
The Joker 10259 Theres really no way for humans to ever colonize Venus. Our bones would be crushed immediatley.
The Joker 10259 Terraforming is hypothetical. Removing an amount of carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide that pushes Venus' atmosphere to 91 atm in such a remote space much closer to the Sun would be quite a feat. Even colonizing Mars would move us only about 1% closer to that (if not a decimal of that).
The Joker 10259 venus? Really?
U must be high
Spacex Actaully wants to go to space
Memorible werd unlike NASA
lordultor shut up idiot NASA, and space X aren’t really competitors they are partnering each other NASA funding space X. Should you rather have NASA waste taxpayers money or give taxpayers money to space X development
TheRealSharkman Why dont people understand jokes theese days
xXConsti2006Xx joke... joke huh the thing everyone complains about. Jew. That was a joke. What they said seems pretty legit.
NASA Is in it for the Publicity, SpaceX is in it For Humanity.
WHY DO YOU KEEP SAYING ORION LIKE THAT
ikr what a poor soul
or-ee-un
oh-rye-un
because *urmomgay*
Jescide Life *no u*
One of the most fantastic recent inventions was SpaceX's development of a rocket that could be reused, thus saving billions of dollars over time. I would say that currently, they would be the ones winning the public vs. private "space race". Let's hope NASA is able to do something to level the playing field, as they have become reliant on that same rocket to transport goods. Paying 130 million for each transport is better and cheaper than having to develop a rocket every time, which could cost billions.
10-20mil per launch isn't bad, but the same could have been accomplished with a focus on streamlining manufacturing. it isn't the time for rocket reusability yet, that'll come for its-scale launch vehicles
Thats the falcon nine I belive. The boosters land in a designated area. Because of the technology in them needed to land it, and the fuel needed to slow it down how ever, it can carry less fuel then a standard rocket.
per launch cost is fixed no matter payload size, and rocket is always loaded with max fuel. all reusability means is a lower max payload capacity, it doesn't mean it costs more
Really remarkable, indeed. Cause like, down here, sustentability is a choice, but in space it will be a fundamental necessity, otherwise we won't get farther than Mars, if even to Mars we get.
ISRO developed it too...Plus we use modified kerosene oil...isn't that great.
To be honest with you, people have more faith in SpaceEx because after NASA stopped sending rockets up here in Florida, SpaceEX has taken its glory. I still miss when I was a kid in elementary and middle school here in Orlando, FL and when NASA announced they would launch a space shuttle, the teachers would make all the kids go outside and watch the rocket leave Earth.
Andre Zibner Agree, but it's SpaceX, not SpaceEx hahahaha
Planet Genesis Lmfaooo MY B, SPACEX
The Orion Capsule and SLS, Space Launch System, can vastly outperform the falcon 9 heavy in terms of thrust to weight and carrying capacity, NASA is a larger less nimble organization than SpaceX and has a much broader focus, however after over 100 manned and over 1000 unmanned missions currently has a 98%+ mission success rate, while spaceX has approximately a 93% launch success rate which is lower the industry standard, 95% success rate. In short NASA has vastly more experience, more funding, and given proper direction could easily transport humans to the outer solar system by the 2040s
Like the video said, NASA has been starving in terms of funding. Luckily, president Trump signed a bill giving about 20 billion dollars to NASA. I have a feeling that he recognizes the importance of our space program and is attempting to get it going again.
John T. Yes, I was going to say that President Trump's recent actions to revive the space program could bring new hope of a future with space exploration once again
If NASA and Space X collab they will be much stonrger and probably will be a sucessful journey
ClashWith SKULL it was suppose to happen. But the amount of cut back it made to keep its stuff floating in space is way too much for them. They were suppose to go on a project name red dragon.
DarkLight even though it's private, it still is way behind on terms of foundation, where do you think space x launches its rockets from, its from NASA's launch pads. On top of that, they've never put a man in space before, Space X hasn't yet gone through the trial and error process that got NASA astronauts to the moon, such as the Apollo one disaster. Accidents are bound to happen, there will be setbacks, it's not all smooth sailing from here on out for you Martian MUSKeteers, colonization and even the basic exploration of Mars by humans is still farther away than many people think
No NASA is driven by government and that would stop SpaceX doing what they want
NaSpaceX
Actually... they do on several points, they aren't ennemies.
you didn't really give the main reason why SpaceX is so successful
coming in
Good job replying on a 2 month old comment dumbass
Abby Slater 🤝
Because Elon had money. Go read a book bout him.
Because they got elon?
beastie _38 the amount of fails that they had already I wouldn't call them "successful"
America got so bored of their being not foreign space competition, that they created their own.
Draude P. Haven't you heard about India's ISRO. Alone only they're kicking everyone's ass. Even Musk said that he's afraid of successful rise of ISRO.
Kratos ez nasa’s funding is more than that of indias entire budget
Kratos ez lol load of bullshit . They are not kicking anyone's ass. Isro is equivalent to NASA in 1960s
Draude P. Wht happens when u have to much money 🤷🏽♂️
Siddharth it's still quite successful
Why won't they just work with each other? Them together would space exploration easier!
TheGamingMarine different ideology,private sector vs joint sector
exactly
That’s not how America works
They do work together. Why would a giant nasa text be written on the falcon 9 if they didn't?
they are also competeition is good for driving innovation but they alsow ork together its no big deal
NASA is better, but SpaceX is WAY more ambitious.
Swig Playa
No, it can be trusted. Their CEO is Elon Musk, a god
0:10
Soviet, not Russian
same.
Oh yeah
RUSSIA WAS SOVIET IN THE PAST!
TheChosen Human no Russia is just the largest member/ state of the United soviet states of Russia
Ryan Jones there are still people that love Stalin nothing changed anyway
Falcon Heavy Launched....
Stupid I know
only 189 comments? Someone might actually read this!!
congrats! I did
congrats! your lucky!
There's like 3k comments now lmao
Why am I liking this lol
GOTTA LOVE ELON MUSK
?
Humans First Destroys Earth
Mars Is Resting In Peace
Humans:You Next
Why did you put the Russian flag instead of the USSR flag?
cause there are dumb kids who think soviet and chinese flags are the same
Because Yuri was born in Russia.
ihswap yuri is from cod modern warfare
sexy sloth He did -.-
Benito Mussolini because the USSR sucks. Just like Italy in WW2 Mussolini.
You should do Australian Military VS Canadian Military
GlimmerGamingMC canada would apologise for defending itself
The two chillest countries?
Canada would win with a minor victory. If no allies are involved then it all comes down to population and manpower, Canada has double the people as Australia which gives them an edge. Besides that, both countries basically share all the same hardware and have near the same amount of all hardware. So if no allies are involved Canada wins. However, if allies were involved Australia would win. The USA would stand out of this battle but the UK would side with Australia, New Zeeland, Japan, India and China would fund Australia while Canada would be funded by nobody. That's because Australia and Canada both have amazing relations with Europe so they wouldn't get involved.
These battles would be fought in air and sea and there wouldn't be any land battles because Australia is so inhospitable that it is basically impossible to invade and it is the same with Canada. Therefore after a few months with basically no damage to each others country, there would be peace, forced by the EU, Asia and the USA or even the queen could just say, "right you are no longer at war" and that's the end of that. Plus, both countries prefer peace over war so this war wouldn't be very interesting.
GlimmerGamingMC Canada would be beaten hands down. They don't own n have shit !
Idk, Canada is chill with lots of countries, also one of those countries is Austrailia,
So idek why it would start in the first place.
Who's here after the Falcon Heavy launch?!
FearSon b you mean Falcon Heavy
That was a dam good launch.
yup
FearSon 7 me
ME LOOL
just 19 billion $ annual budget for NASA...that's nothing compared to their useless annual defense budget 664 billion $...NASA deserves better than this
then theres isro operating at 1.9 billion 😂😂😂 still doing good
Rishad Mohamed Our defense budget isn't useless. It's just too much.
then open your mouth and shout it instead of just watching the next state of the union and accepting. Or whatever it is they announce the new federal budget with. I am from netherlands. Same here in holland. Everyone complains, after which they say in a cool voice, "right, better get back to paying mny taxes". Bunch of pussies.
If you actually understand why the US spends that much money on defense you wouldn't be saying that. You're comment is just flat out ignorant.
At least give NASA 100b not some rich guys 50 dollar bill.....dissapointing
it is pronounced space-sex?
Henriko Magnifico space-ex
No he got it right
Remember that the first tesla was called Model S, the second Model X and the one after that was gonna be called Model E, but he postponed it and made Model 3 instead. Oh and did I mention Model Y?
S E X Y
Henriko Magnifico probably not 😂😂
Space-ex
Well Space X has just successfully tested the Falcon X soo 2024 seems promising
AL EX falcon heavy you mean?
AndiDG yea idk why i typed X
AL EX haha, that's alright
but spaceX stated that it will not be the way to go, it will be BFR (big falcon/fucking rocket) that will be uses for mars travel in 2024
Don't fucking tell me to subscribe before I see your content.
That's all it is these days though, likes and subs and false shitty little "reactions".
DynamicDan Who is "them", sorry?
DynamicDan Oh, I see. My qualm is more around a human emotion which cannot be measured (only described) becoming divided into four basic words (angry; happy; sad; wow or whatever) on a social media site and these reactions then becoming something you actively associate and relate to various world events (some very deathly, and shoved in your face every time you "go for a scroll"), and I just think there's heaps of bullshit there just to get "Reactions" (a.k.a controversy in some ways), and social media (I'm really referring to Facebook mostly) to me is basically regular exposure to content designed to engineer your mind to consume (easy example is clickbait headlines and controversially styled news) and thus generate revenue.
Its really a personal choice how aware of this sort of thing you are, and even then you have to be responsible for yourself and how often you use media like Facebook (suppose its like smoking in a way), etc and I apologize if I lost the subject matter, however it's just too much to type for for 4 am. Meh, it's only an internet opinion anyway and the truest communication is in the flesh.
true
NASA vs SpaceX is an incorrect way to think about the competition. NASA never developed space craft. NASA hired companies like Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft, North American Rockwell and Northrop Grumman to build the space craft. It is these companies whom SpaceX is in competition with, not NASA.
Loathomar and Lockheed Martin
Watching this in 2020 knowing how much SpaceX has achieved... Mind blowing!!!
And watching this in 2021? Lol
@@jamesoyeleye And watching this in 2022?
they should really work together in my opinion
Husker54 Indeed. The two organizations need to work together. Help each other in situations. Since SpaceX wants to explore mars, they are in charge of that. While NASA and other space organizations take care of finding more planets, stars, asteroids that orbit bodies, etc.
Binary Records no competition = slower progression teamwork can sometimes be bad
MarcusPlaysGames yes but sometimes competition is bad too. Rushing objectives might lead to catastrophic failure.
the world should work together
Husker54 , they really shouldnt tho , things go faster and get done better threw competition not team work, its hard to believe but it is 100% true!
Well people this has happened. On 6th February 2018 Elon Musk DID in fact launch a rocket and landed it BACK ON EARTH SUCCESSFULLY!
the catch? The payload was his midnight cherry Tesla Roadster car and a mannequin, playing Space Odessy is left behind as it is on its journey towards Mars!
SpaceX sounds cooler
Spay Sex
SpermX
Space X (and the private sector in general) is almost certainly going to lead the way in colonization and utilization of space and space resources. NASA is, unfortunately, too bogged down by government politics and their own internal bureaucracy to make the cut
Gorilder yeah, private companies are the future in space, i imagine companies will be motivated to bring in resources from space to trade and that's how they will male their money
gedro7000 they dont have nasa budget but they are eay more efficient with their money, plus they plan on funding it with people buying tickets to go to mars
gedro7000 The "ticket" to mars should cost about 500000$.
Sure, thats still much money, but there are many people who can afford that
Last year at university I actually had to write a 25-page research paper about precisely this topic, comparing the private space industry to government-run approaches like NASA. During my research, I found a few sources that were compelling and labelled what you've mentioned in this video as SpaceX being the "direct approach" method, while NASA uses more of a "stepping stone" method.
The problems with the stepping stones are that you can get bogged down and sidetracked at each step, possibly never reaching your end goal. And the problems with the direct approach is that if not enough safety is tested for you could end up reaching your goal but having suffered more casualties than necessary.
In the end, I came away with the conclusion that the direct approach method was the best idea, as long as enough focus could be kept on safety. I'd rather have made it to Mars and suffered a few losses than never made it at all because of bureaucracy getting in the way of progress.
If only the US government would take half of the military's 600 billion dollar budget and put it into NASA we would have men exploring different solar systems by now.
Ben Dover Nope, becouse FTL travel is impossible, and the nearest solar system is over 1,5 lightyears away
It may be impossible to move faster than light, but bending space around a ship could, technically, make it travel at speeds faster than light. And their are solar sails that NASA is planning to send to other solar systems to take detail photographs at 15% the speed of light. They would take a while, but they would get there in time for our lifetimes to still be ongoing. And I believe you made a mistake as the closest star system is 4.3 light years away not 1.5 light years.
OhioansAreMyFavoritePeople True what you said about the star xD Yeah solar sails that can go up to 15% speed of light have been planned, the problem is the acceleration. The need to start very near the sun and use the acceleration in a straight line all the way across the solar system to get to that speed, which is incredibly hard to do
Do not forget that the budget they put into the army aims to defend the country and therefore defend NASA as well. It's not so easy to talk about budget because they also have to maintain their place as the 1st world power for many reasons that we do not even imagine. The development of the country in all fields, including space research, is part of it.
Imran El Mir Is there any realistic reason to believe anyone (except north korea) would attack to the US? They can keep their nukes but cut down on other parts of the military, the nukes only need a tiny fraction of the budget, and they would still be able to keep world peace with only them and like eight of their current army size or budget
"rub shoulders with Uranus" Im sorry for being so dirty about this.
Cheeky.
The difference is that spacex is owned by a genius and Nasa is owned by a country that has an animal for president
Says you, trump won.
Get over it lol
SpaceX is a Private Space company. thats the biggest main differenece between NASA so dont think they are the same.
NASA = Not Actually Space Astronauts
Stupid humans. Your a god
Stupid humans.
Not
Actually
Sending
Anything to space
Anger Assasin Don't call humans stupid if you can't spell 'you're'. 😂
Stupid humans. Fuckin bullshit which ppl's trying to pull,well good luck DumbAss
TheChosen Human Can tell you're not the "chosen human" with a minecraft pic lmao
SpaceX, the upstart company and NASA, the government agency, both have plans to venture to Mars and orbit the Moon.
do NASA vs ISIS...
Michael Del Moral I had to read that twice cuz I thought you did ISS the space station lmao
OverLordthe 1st hahaha that’s so funny
Michael Del Moral are u veing sarcastic or for real?
I UNKNOWN I sarcastic
Michael Del Moral lol 😂
hehe uranus *ok... i'll slowly back away...*
KOΛLΛ_ NET21 wtf
586576565436475 Yes ?
I’ve been in Uranus hehe 😂
*I'LL SLOWLY PUSH IN*
It's pronounced "urine-us". There, you can still make a potty joke with its correct pronunciation.
The 3 countries that sent people to space are also the three factions that are playable in BF4 lmao
Well, China, the USA, and Russia are very easily recognizable countries, to be fair.
Not a coincidence... think about it
so you're implying that DICE based their factions off of this knowledge? i mean, bf4 doesn't have any campaign missions that take place in space because thats call of duty
Maybe cuz they run the world basically
Johan Reillo yeah thats true
I wish we terraformed mars right now :D
it would take us 1000 years to make it like 50% like earth :b in our life time we cant breath air on mars
Insulting_bjorn I don’t think we ever could breath on mars it would most likely be like the mars base in Mass Effect 3
thats some dumb shit, all you have to do is heat the planet up.
+Batvolle Try heating up 6.39 × 10^23 kilogram, it'll take you awhile.
Günther drop thermonuclear bombs on the poles. 😉😊
North koreas space agency is called nada and that is exactly what they did (nada means nothing)
TheEmeraldShaft
br?
TheEmeraldShaft lol
The major difference is profit motive. A private company operates on the profit motive. NASA, a government agency only spends what it needs to operate. SpaceX will continue to ask for more money as it needs to show its shareholders it is making ever increasing profits. In the long run SpaceX will be more expensive than NASA ever was.
Gevernment agencies are inefficient. I am rooting for Musk on this one.
Private companies cut corners, SpaceX got my trust just yesterday but they shouldn't be surprised if people are still wiery of them.
You can't spell government what type of keyboard you have
I would LOVE to witness a second space race, it would be amazing.
There's not rivalry, Spacex is alive thanks to NASA and both work for each other
Yes
MAKE SPACE GREAT AGAIN
Dragos Stanca make space great for the first time not again
we will build a wall from the
from the?
SPACE MEXICAN ALIENS!
KrapToniteGaming And *THEY HAVE TO PAY!*
KrapToniteGaming We need to build a space wall to stop all these illegal space aliens!!! lol
MAKE SPACE FAKE AGAIN- oops my bad, it ALWAYS WAS.
2:15 2019 has come, and yet no one has sent a tourist around the moon
Wow this channel grow so fast... when I first time saw this channel I tot it was underrated but now...
SpaceX is better
Please make a video comparing NASA with ISRO.🇮🇳😊
Voyager 2 was launched first to space and then like 2 weeks later they launched the voyager 1 but it was sent on a different course that's why it has overtaken voyager 2
The difference is SpaceX just successfully launched the worlds most powerful operating rocket
Lols For Luls no shit
The difference is if nasa were to bring back the Saturn five. The falcon heavy rocket would be half as powerful. But yeah rn it is currently the worlds most powerful. Gotta love america. Fuck yeahhh
Teryaki Sauce might be the most powerful but it’s 14x the cost
Teryaki Sauce yes and falcon heavy can do the same thing as the Saturn 5 for a fraction of the cost and land all three boosters
I, for one, fully support our new musky overlords
Shadowslice praise the Lord and saviour elon musk
Shadowslice simpsons
SpaceX just turned nasa into stone age after launching starship sn8!
True
1:38 talks about SpaceX, shows Soyuz. 4:29 talks about Soyuz, shows Saturn V
do NASA vs ESA
NASA is colonizing moon.
SpaceX is colonizing mars.
2 years later...
Elon: **Hosts meme review with Justin Roiland**
5:59
Do Minecraft vs Roblox
Cringe is about to go down
John Plays They already did.
TheMewx I'm just going to let that sink in...
John Plays already done
Its done
NASA should focus on exploring deep space and far ends of solar system like Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune and beyond
And company like space x should explore the inner solar system like sun mercury venus earth and mars and beyond our solar system
Make Space Great Again!
Henry Carmichael
McDonald's And Golfing Again
Speak slower, why the hurry?
This is an Infographics Show. It's meant to be told in quick speeds.
Change video speed
0.25x speed sounds hella creepy
Homemade Chemistry Its not that fast, a child can understand it
Homemade Chemistry Its supposed to be a science quickie. A rough knowledge fuck, y'know?
Every part of settlement on the moon is faster with more & more help or cooperation plus pulling together!
JUST SENT 2 GUYS INTO SPACE 2020
Soo. Anyone here after Nasa and SpaceX Lauched the crew dragon with a Sleek Space Suit?!
so hyped for the future
Nasa and Spacex have to compete. Show each other what they can do, and be better than the other. that is how innovation happends
Lets just hope humans wont pollute mars..
Musk wont allow that
Falcon heavy was a huge success
I love the idea of the video and I'd love to see more space agencies comparissons. On the other side, the images for the video weren't the best (spacecraft, rovers and rockets had nothing to do with the real design most of the times). The most important thing about Tesla is that cars are electric, not that some of them can drive themselves for a while. As an "expert" (enthusiast) in space and Elon Musk's companies, I'd be more than glad to help with that kid of videos. Keep up the amazing stuff you guys do!
Wow, I'm watching old videos (it's 2024 now) and how wrong all this almost all of this is wrong now
SAME
PLEASE MAKE ISRO V/S NASA.Becoz I think you will make it in the best way.
0:30 WRONG Canada was the 3rd country in space
No one cares
Eh
Would be better if you compared American NASA with Russian ROSKOSMOS
Can't tell if you're trying to say RAW SAUCE
I think it’s good to have private sector, government sector and public sector working together but still separate entities. This will allow for advancement through competition with some shared goals and specializations.
2030 space wars
make a video india vs china