What if the driver watched the big bang theory? Parallel Haruhi Suzumiya & The Big Bang Theory: Itsuki Koizumi & Sheldon Cooper - the annoying person / boke / funny man Kyon & Leonard Hofstadter - the annoyed person / tsukkomi / the straight man
Kyon has a major effect on the narrative, from the novels to the manga and series, his words are vaguely him speaking, thinking or puzzling over something from the point of view of an outsider, either before or after the moment being discussed. He's the author of the story and his own life. The series merely pretends that Haruhi is the one causing everything, to make Kyon less capricious as well.
I think this particular scene explains the ideia behind the whole series It's funny how Haruhi , despite being the protagonist, is the one that contributes the least to this anime
Ergo, the fact that the universe is fine tuned to support us in an illusion: there are endless possible universes where there is no life, but since there is no-one in those to ask those, to living creatures it always looks like the universe is 'just right" to support them.(The same argument can be applied to a lot of things, eg. why do we exist, why do we look the way we are, why has civilization survived etc. Answer: the chance was not neccessarily high, but the question preassumes the answer.)
I need to rewatch this show, there’s so much in this conversation that I totally forgot about / went way over my head the first time I watched it in elem school 😅
Parallel Haruhi Suzumiya & The Big Bang Theory: Itsuki Koizumi & Sheldon Cooper - the annoying person / boke / funny man Kyon & Leonard Hofstadter - the annoyed person / tsukkomi / the straight man
why is the universe explainable? why are there laws instead of chaos--ontological epistemological chaos? why is there order instead of a soup of randomness?
@BlankPicketSign I agree with your opinion, but I think you're confusing things because the Anthropic Principle is a different arguzment from the one you're criticizing. The core question of both is the "finely tuned universe" problem. The "dumb" assumption is that life and humans are "intended" by the universe. The Anthropic Principle is the ANSWER to that question. It states that the universe could have ended up in a million other ways, but only a few of those would support humans.
I can sum it up better. In the anthropic viewpoint, the reason we're here is because we're here, and, if it were impossible, then we wouldn't be. Still sounds like bulls**t but thats the gist of it anyway.
There is a distinction between the anthropic principle and the strong anthropic principle. The strong anthropic principle is that our existence defined the reality that we now inhabit.
Even though that the Anthropic Principle is complete crap ¬_¬ And It annoys me to no end when people take such an Unfounded, Unsupported idea seriously. Humans aren't that important on a cosmological scale, We not even Slightly important. The universe would exist without humans, it has to 4.5 Billion Years. The Universe is a old enough to go outside by it's self... You don't need to hold its hand =^_^=
@@PacoCotero1221 ew a materialist, long live the neutral monism of abstract concepts from which maths, logic and the metaphysics they imply fashioned the universe
The driver is like "Wtf is this guy saying?"
I know it's been 8 years, but the driver is Arakawa, one of Koizumi's colleagues
@@beepboopethanj Still active comment likes woop woop
@@beepboopethanj really?
@@true_neutral3378 yea, i met him a while ago
What if the driver watched the big bang theory?
Parallel Haruhi Suzumiya & The Big Bang Theory:
Itsuki Koizumi & Sheldon Cooper - the annoying person / boke / funny man
Kyon & Leonard Hofstadter - the annoyed person / tsukkomi / the straight man
the melancholy of haruhi suzumiya:
half comedy slice of life.
Half existential crisis and philosophy.
Kyon has a major effect on the narrative, from the novels to the manga and series, his words are vaguely him speaking, thinking or puzzling over something from the point of view of an outsider, either before or after the moment being discussed.
He's the author of the story and his own life.
The series merely pretends that Haruhi is the one causing everything, to make Kyon less capricious as well.
And they say TV doesn't teach you anything.
I think this particular scene explains the ideia behind the whole series
It's funny how Haruhi , despite being the protagonist, is the one that contributes the least to this anime
I think it's more apt to say Haruhi is the titular character, while Kyon is the actual protagonist.
Shes not the protagonist.
She's not the protagonist though
Ergo, the fact that the universe is fine tuned to support us in an illusion: there are endless possible universes where there is no life, but since there is no-one in those to ask those, to living creatures it always looks like the universe is 'just right" to support them.(The same argument can be applied to a lot of things, eg. why do we exist, why do we look the way we are, why has civilization survived etc. Answer: the chance was not neccessarily high, but the question preassumes the answer.)
I need to rewatch this show, there’s so much in this conversation that I totally forgot about / went way over my head the first time I watched it in elem school 😅
When Jotaro starts explaining shit...
The music in this scene is amazing
the music makes this 10x scarier :S
Rip me I’m watching this at night
Koizumi is also voiced by the same actor who Jotaro Kujo and Sebastian Michaelis.
it is INCREDIBLE
And BATTLER
It gets more ironic because Kyon is also voiced by the same actor that did Part 2 Joseph Joestar
@@txshiroo._ I know right
i just realized its ono daisuke 👀
This is the kind of thing I think about when I'm in Maths.....
I think, therefore I am. So is why we exist.
They really convoluted that explanation in the beginning
driver: screams internally
Parallel Haruhi Suzumiya & The Big Bang Theory:
Itsuki Koizumi & Sheldon Cooper - the annoying person / boke / funny man
Kyon & Leonard Hofstadter - the annoyed person / tsukkomi / the straight man
Mind = blowing explanations~
why is the universe explainable? why are there laws instead of chaos--ontological epistemological chaos? why is there order instead of a soup of randomness?
The ominous soundtrack is too good
タクシー運転手「さっぱりわからん。」
@BlankPicketSign I agree with your opinion, but I think you're confusing things because the Anthropic Principle is a different arguzment from the one you're criticizing. The core question of both is the "finely tuned universe" problem. The "dumb" assumption is that life and humans are "intended" by the universe. The Anthropic Principle is the ANSWER to that question. It states that the universe could have ended up in a million other ways, but only a few of those would support humans.
Hi
この世界は突然具現化された
いままではシミュレーションしてたらしいどこかで
I can sum it up better. In the anthropic viewpoint, the reason we're here is because we're here, and, if it were impossible, then we wouldn't be. Still sounds like bulls**t but thats the gist of it anyway.
Sounds very reasonable to me.
There is a distinction between the anthropic principle and the strong anthropic principle.
The strong anthropic principle is that our existence defined the reality that we now inhabit.
Haruhi rational Itsuki you must be kidding.
Ain't reading all at😂😂😂😂
SFラブコメディ
Religion is the key
Even though that the Anthropic Principle is complete crap ¬_¬
And It annoys me to no end when people take such an Unfounded, Unsupported idea seriously.
Humans aren't that important on a cosmological scale, We not even Slightly important.
The universe would exist without humans, it has to 4.5 Billion Years.
The Universe is a old enough to go outside by it's self... You don't need to hold its hand =^_^=
Rey Mustayne Why is someone responding to a comment 7 years old? This craps from 2011... also long live materialism>idealism
@@PacoCotero1221 ew a materialist, long live the neutral monism of abstract concepts from which maths, logic and the metaphysics they imply fashioned the universe
@@UnordEntertainment WHY IS SOME RESPONDING TO A COMMENT TWO YEARS OLD, AGAIN?
@@PacoCotero1221 why does it matter lol
@@UnordEntertainment Does anybody know though? I love finding my older self shitty comments randomly.
glib argument for a convenient series.
You like dragon ball and you complain about convenience
@@ouounbd3820 Touché
He's right, you know.