The analysis of the conversation so far, about a 1/4 of the way, is difficult, but powering through it just the same. Your commentary is a derivative of what was said on that interview, and what was possibly meant by them could be confused, not sure. But any review would be a derivative of sorts, the trouble is the degree of assumptions made that ultimately may or may not be true, and sometimes, partially true. I myself am summarizing this video just a 1/4 of the way, due to some perceived imbalance in framing. But that's only due to me seeing the original, and now contrasting with your recap. There is a space available for people to entertain information, and leave it pending, as opposed to drawing solid lines over claims or newer claims atop previous ones. In the beginning you explained something to the effect that you won't focus on the history they were discussing, that seems like a mistake, as it leaves out context that may be useful in your review. Just at the level of thinking critically over process, not the content discussed per say, all sorts of red flags have popped up just a 1/4 of the way in. But humans share all the faults that are available to humans, some more than others in certain ways, and it's understandable.
The Narrow Gate 13 “You can enter God’s Kingdom only through the narrow gate. The highway to hell[f] is broad, and its gate is wide for the many who choose that way. 14 But the gateway to life is very narrow and the road is difficult, and only a few ever find it. The Tree and Its Fruit 15 “Beware of false prophets who come disguised as harmless sheep but are really vicious wolves. 16 You can identify them by their fruit, that is, by the way they act. Can you pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 A good tree produces good fruit, and a bad tree produces bad fruit. 18 A good tree can’t produce bad fruit, and a bad tree can’t produce good fruit. 19 So every tree that does not produce good fruit is chopped down and thrown into the fire. 20 Yes, just as you can identify a tree by its fruit, so you can identify people by their actions. True Disciples 21 “Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. 22 On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ 23 But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’You, however, will again heed יהוה and obey all the divine commandments that I enjoin upon you this day. www.sefaria.org/Deuteronomy.30.8
Who's evil? The Jews? Do you know what projection is? And what is next for them? What will be the next "history lesson" they will teach us? Where does this end? @@DOPEDOGTOPDOG
Not sure if it was before or after the war, but I was out the moment he interviewed Andrew Tate with starry eyes while he lied about what he did and what he's charged with
Tucker has a specific style of journalism. He wants his guest to tell his story, and let the audience decide. He doesn't care for the virtue signalling. He's not concerned with what people on the outside think about him, only his inner circle. That's very healthy. He doesn't read twitter. He lives in a silo. He's not afraid if someone calls him an Antisemite, or a racist, cause he KNOWS he's not. At different times Tucker affirmed that he believes America is not to be morally equated with Germany or Russia in WWII. But Tucker has legitimate questions, and if the only ones asking or saying certain things, have brought them to these sorts of conclusions, then what can we expect? Right now, people are making the pitch that Putin invading Ukraine is the same as Hitler invading Poland. That's the problem! Just stop it! Putin is not Hitler! That's the entire point! That's what Churchill saw. The fact that people are saying that to justify another world war, obviously begs the question; what if what I see about Putin is also true about Hitler? That's where we are...
People have been talking, writing about, and questioning ww2 during, and every day since. I've lost any respect that I once had for tucker. I never had any respect for Candace.
Hitler openly talked about needing to liquidate the Slavs in Mein Kampf, that alone would obviate the argument that not having enough food for the prisoners of the Eastern Front. Pure tripe.
yeah? Where exactly in Mein Kampf does he say that, citation needed. And if he felt that way, why was he so accommodating to Czechs and especially Slovaks, not to mention Croats?
@@toobalkain That's my understanding. We all see how much they lie and lie about current events and recent history...but we are supposed to believe what we are told about WWII and the Nazis
@richiecooke1984 most (probably all) countries in the world didn't or still don't have equal rights for women, gays and other minorities as they do for straight men. What's your point, N*ziboy?
I am about done with Tucker. A month or two ago he said there could have been no reason to have used the atom bombs to end WW2, like Truman was just insane, and he never heard of Okinawa, Iwo Jima, Manila, Peleliu, Saipan--and the casualty estimates (Japanese and American) for invading Japan, and a dozen other reasons. Then he interviewed a priest from a West Bank church who said that Israel was responsible for all the prejudices against Christians in the West Bank, a story that has been told and debunked numerous times over the decades since 1967. And now, this travesty. Yes, Churchill was a complicated person, not all heroic by any means. But this latest is just ridiculous. And, sorry, but the Germans knew they would take millions of Soviet prisoners in 1941, and decided not to feed them and to let them starve because the Slavs would all be either enslaved or killed, in any case, so, why bother?
My Dad was on the USS Comstock on his way to land invasion of Japan. He was 17. No combat experience. The only thing he ever said about it was that he was sure he was going to die. Those bombs saved him. We had tried everything else. Carpet bombing. Blockades. No surrender until the second bomb was dropped and the Emperor stepped in.
@@JulieB-k3h I believe that. I don't think people realize how dedicated the Japanese were at the time. I've seen archival footage of civilians (women with their children) jumping off cliffs instead of surrendering. Tucker is old enough to be my father and it's so irritating that his rationale for use of force rivals that of a preteen girl. I wonder what he would have said if the b0mbß were never dropped and the US cásualty total would have numbered in the high six figures.
Ok,I just listened to this guy's alternative history and lowkey Hitler apologism, Why is Tucker just nodding along and not challenging him on any of these obvious fallacies? That's not the Tucker Carlson I used to watch
Tucker wasn't there nor was the Historian ! My Dad saw Bergen Belson first hand ! I'll believe what my farther told me ! He was driving one of the bulldozers burrying the bodies ! He saw the lampshades made of human skin ! He saw the brothel's with little children in them . He saw and could smell Bergen Belson ! and some of those old guys are still alive .... Tucker ,like Candice should be a bit more respectful to truth ! and my granddad saw the concentration camps of the Boer war too ! Denying truth is EVIL ! shame on anyone who believes this crap .!
And did nobody tell your father that the lampshades the soap shrunken heads were al faked for anti germany propaganda, he probably raped german children because I heard that,
One day, right or wrong, all can be forgotten. Like with the Israel contra "Palestine" case, people will then have to reduce the issue down to what they actually know. In the case of Nazis, we know they are evil per their own ideology. Thankfully, that is quite enough to think that lampshades (whether that in particular happened or not) indeed could easily have happened given such evil as we know they stand for.
Baloney. It was a concentration camp. All the death camps were supposedly in Poland and Ukraine. There were no lampshades made of human skin. The Brits and Canadians liberated that camp, not America
I liked his show on Fox, but let's face it, he isn't very educated. He was just mostly reading off a script. He currently falls into the camp of "it's the opposite of wjat the media says so it must be true"
You'd think so, but a lot of people are actually ignorant about it. Tucker carlson is nearing his 60s. Even if did learn anything about it at school, I dount he cared enough to remember. Not white and Christian - not his problem.
@@hyperreal what exactly? Alex Jones has been right 90%percent of the time and he isn’t saying anything new about the deep state and globalists. Joe Rogan is harmless and has changed much of his stances on being a socialist.
@@hyperreal what exactly? Alex Jones has been right 90%percent of the time and he isn’t saying anything new about the deep state and globalists. Joe Rogan is harmless and has changed much of his stances on being a socialist.
How could the Germans throw in with the Nazis? Read Hayek's The Road to Serfdom. He talks about how the socialists and statist thinking led directly to Naziism, which was just a different form of what they already had. Even down to the socialist youth groups that were just converted into the Hitler Youth. It was not a radical change. It is not like the Germans in the 1920s were libertarians and suddenly became statists.
Before Weimar, the Kaiser (King). Weimar was a mix of Social Democrats, other socialists, Communists who founded Antifa, as well as conservatives. The Communists and Nazis teamed up to defeat the Social Democrats.
The idea that the Versailles Treaty was abnormally “unfair” to Germany is a myth, specifically the “war guilt clause”, which actually does not exist. The clause reads as follows: “The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.” You’ll notice it doesn’t single out Germany here, but Germany *and her allies*, and further more it is talking about responsibility for damages inflicted by the Central Powers during the war, not about who started what. This myth is very pervasive today, scarily so, and is even taught in American schools. The worst part is that this narrative comes from German propaganda at the time, and of course later on, Nazi Propaganda. These are the *real* lies told in our schools, *not* the Holocaust or the pure evil of Hitler and the Nazi movement.
Sorry, Kirk, but the Right is much faster, infinitely faster, to reconsider support than the Left is. Most of the Right is simply asking questions about Ukraine, questions that few seem willing to even address.
No clue how the algorithm got me here but I think I watched the same video that Tucker did and I didnt see any glaring inaccuracies. He makes it very clear that you will criticize him and here you are.
Absolutely, just make sure you actually have something to question. Agreeing to an interpretation based purely on speculation because it aligns with your political views isn’t being a free thinker, it’s being an ideologue.
Another great commentary video. I really appreciate the way you guys draw on the principles espoused by Ayn Rand, without ever falling into the trap of becoming obsessed with "peace" to such a degree that there is no level of evil that would warrant abandoning that peace. It's so refreshing to see there are still people willing to give a full throated defense of personal liberty, right alongside a proud tradition of protecting that liberty through the obvious necessity of nation states and their collective armed forces. So many "libertarians" (Dave smith, the Mises Caucus etc.) seem to have adopted the idea that individual freedom requires you abandon all international alliances like NATO, because guys like Putin might feel threatened by them. And just abandon all those countries that would be threatened by doing so. Stay awesome!
He may have '"studied" it, that still doesn't mean he's also telling the truth. 🙄 You strike me as one of those who *never* doubted Faucci's narrative (AKA Mr Science!), not even at the very end, probably boosted up the wazoo and tripled masked outside or while being by yourself at home or in the car...😆
You can play Twitter vids at 2x, I always do and it is very efficient. Daniel, I have to comment on your comment from a previous show about why you refuse to call Judea and Samaria by its proper name. You refuse to do so because Israel is doing the wrong thing in that area so you will not use the name of the area that Israel uses? So you would rather fuel Israel-hater propaganda war against the existence of Israel? In that war it is essential to call the area the western bank of the Jordan River. Just some geographical area floating around in the world. On the ground ALL THE SIGNS and people say this is Judea and Samaria. By not using the correct terms your are helping spread a big lie. Please reconsider your position. Kirk's behavior/face making at the beginning of many shows is so off-putting and immature it takes away from the seriousness that the movement desires.
@@BitcoinMeister you raise an interesting point about not calling it West Bank. It suggests that it's a vacant plot of land that has never been inhabited. Honest question, why do you think Daniel is wrong about what Israel needs to do?
@@llharrison77 I am not exactly sure what he wants Israel to do there. In theory he could be right, my bigger point is he should just call the place my the correct name if he wants Israel to get out of this mess.
@@BitcoinMeister I think Israel shoudl return to Pre-Oslo state, occupy gaza as well as all the areas given to PA and place the people under military regime similar to how it did after the independence war with the Arab population & Golan Heights until the people are ready to be integrated into the larger Israeli society. Judea & Samaria is the correct administrative term for areas in the West Bank controlled by Israel, but referring to cities like Ramallah as "part of Judea & Samaria" is just delusional, acting like Israel controls what it doesn't and willingly gave up, Israel made a huge mistake with the Oslo Accords in needs to correct. Until then West Bank just seems a more appropriate term to refer to the region.
Dave smith: Sorry for being a Jew! Img yes. The poor nazis, they were so misunderstood! Did I already say I'm sorry for being a Jew? Please kill me last!
I can't BELIEVE I listened to a half hour of this topic only to hear 3 things everybody knows. How did you get 6 million? (No answer) Churchill drank and could have entered earlier. (Well, yeah.) Tucker don't push back too much. (Well, yeah again.) I had to stop watching there. Wasting my day.
I (still an Objectivist, still fully on the side of Israel contra Hamas -albeit a bit tired of the content spree-, etc) split hairs with you guys a lot these day, but Kirk said it all by making that face. Never forget: Tucker would ban self driving cars "immediately!"
Also, one can actually think of WW2 as beginning with Hitler’s enabling of Franco to begin the brutal dictatorship in Spain in the Spanish Civil War. Hitler had plentiful of terrible evil acts on his dance card.
Thanks for doing this. That interview was a little weird. The guy’s take on the Germans’ concern for the welfare of Soviet prisoners (and civilians) is an abomination. Revisionist BS.
You oversimplified h0l0c@ust denial to a simple it did happen/it didn’t happen binary. The fact is denial laws create a difficulty in analysing various aspects that would relate to the attribution of guilt. It’s very important that a specific dubious narrative be told that assigns guilt in a conclusive predetermined way and if what you say is perceived in any way as decreasing or redirecting or casting doubt on where the guilt is out you will get legal problems.
"The most important popular historian working in the United States today", according to Carlson. Yet Cooper has never written a book in his life, according to Niall Ferguson. Douglas Murray is right. The West has decided that we can't have any heroes anymore, including Churchill. How did we get here?
I have an issue not only with the historical inaccuracies, but the main rhetoric or language used is concerning. That some jews 'ended up dead' ... Like it was all passive and couldn't be prevented. Thats dangerous. There were people performing the killing, they didnt just end up dead. Wpuld love to hear all your opinions on Ordinary Men, the book researching the branch of the SS that went into Poland with Operation Barbarossa. Thanks!
Tucker used to be much more reasonable, but lately, the last few years he’s become unhinged and gone down the religious wacko road as well. Not sure what happened to him, but he’s gone nuts.
If you can't ask questions then how can they offer evidence against the history we currently conclude? Either: you can ask questions or you cannot offer such evidence. This is basic protocol of inquiry, critical analysis. It seems to be lost on the masses.
These are not real questions. They are like saying, "Getting to the moon sounds technologically impossible to me, but I'm just asking questions" (wink wink)
Guys, there is no need to belabor the stuff about 'being humanitarian by killing the prisoners'. You are kind of putting things into his mouth: he did not say that it would have been a good thing, or that the Germans were actually doing that. Also, he did not explicitly say that this had anything to do with the Holocaust (although he did mention that these were not only prisoners of war but also civilians). He merely quoted a German Kommandant who apparently wrote a letter in desperation asking the German leadership whether it would be more humane to kill them instead of letting them starve to death. The problem with his short description of the Russia campaign by the Germans was that he didn't directly mention anything about the Holocaust which was already ongoing in occupied Poland and then continued with a vengeance during the Russia campaign. If - by talking about the starving civilians in the camps - he wanted to say that this was all that the Germans did to the Jews, then he is in denial of historical facts: even David Irving, who is skeptical about the gas chambers in Auschwitz fully acknowledges that the Germans shot large numbers of Jews from the beginning of their Russia campaign. But, to me it is not clear that he wanted to say that. Is he a Holocaust denier? I think the relevant parts of the interview with Tucker don't allow to conclude that. For that, more should be known about his stance on this.
Fellas please. The grotesque anti-intellectualism on display here would shock a smart teenager. Among your gems "I haven't listened yet but he seems like a...., Austria didn't become Nartjie like Germany etc etc etc. . I'm not wasting more of my time with this foolishness.
There are non what-so-ever. We have 3 kids who haven't dived into history other than wikepedia who are playing wannabe heroes fighting unrevealed denial... waste of time watching this.
Absolutely correct. Just because “they” control the narrative and are happy to see England be “less English” doesn’t mean that “they” (whoever they are) are Jews. Sure, this is, almost verbatim, the same logic Nazis used but he never actually said it. “They” are just wealthy global elites that have international authority to maintain narratives and punish the Everyman. Of course, Churchill never actually said “I’m starting WW2” so likewise the jury is still out.
@@jazura2 Ayn Rand was a Russian-American atheist. She was not 'Jewish'. And while I agree that pointing out antisemitism is important, there are plenty of other resources that do this, so these people shouldn't be hijacking an objectivist channel to further an unrelated agenda.
![ATEEZ(에이티즈) - [GOLDEN HOUR : Part.2] Preview](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/X4PfgRPBUVo/mqdefault.jpg)
Jeremy Corbyn Forms Pro-Terrorist Party
►ruclips.net/user/live0oUUor29l5I
The analysis of the conversation so far, about a 1/4 of the way, is difficult, but powering through it just the same. Your commentary is a derivative of what was said on that interview, and what was possibly meant by them could be confused, not sure. But any review would be a derivative of sorts, the trouble is the degree of assumptions made that ultimately may or may not be true, and sometimes, partially true. I myself am summarizing this video just a 1/4 of the way, due to some perceived imbalance in framing. But that's only due to me seeing the original, and now contrasting with your recap. There is a space available for people to entertain information, and leave it pending, as opposed to drawing solid lines over claims or newer claims atop previous ones. In the beginning you explained something to the effect that you won't focus on the history they were discussing, that seems like a mistake, as it leaves out context that may be useful in your review. Just at the level of thinking critically over process, not the content discussed per say, all sorts of red flags have popped up just a 1/4 of the way in. But humans share all the faults that are available to humans, some more than others in certain ways, and it's understandable.
The Narrow Gate
13 “You can enter God’s Kingdom only through the narrow gate. The highway to hell[f] is broad, and its gate is wide for the many who choose that way. 14 But the gateway to life is very narrow and the road is difficult, and only a few ever find it.
The Tree and Its Fruit
15 “Beware of false prophets who come disguised as harmless sheep but are really vicious wolves. 16 You can identify them by their fruit, that is, by the way they act. Can you pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 A good tree produces good fruit, and a bad tree produces bad fruit. 18 A good tree can’t produce bad fruit, and a bad tree can’t produce good fruit. 19 So every tree that does not produce good fruit is chopped down and thrown into the fire. 20 Yes, just as you can identify a tree by its fruit, so you can identify people by their actions.
True Disciples
21 “Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. 22 On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ 23 But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’You, however, will again heed יהוה and obey all the divine commandments that I enjoin upon you this day.
www.sefaria.org/Deuteronomy.30.8
LOL-O-Hoax = 40 decapitated babies
You should rename your channel " Goblin Central " !
Oh how dare they claim that The Military Industrial Complex Operates in Israel just like in every damn nation on the planet.
Tucker and Candace are going the same road to nowhere.
It seems their brains never fully developed from infancy.
They're concerned with jew pdf iles but have family friends like Andrew tate which are self confessed pdf iles
@@Sheikh_spireNot really, they’re just simply antisemites.
or perhaps they are just showing courage in the face of absolute evil and savagery ?
Who's evil? The Jews? Do you know what projection is? And what is next for them? What will be the next "history lesson" they will teach us? Where does this end? @@DOPEDOGTOPDOG
I was one of those Tucker fans Kirk mentioned. That changed after 10/7.
Not sure if it was before or after the war, but I was out the moment he interviewed Andrew Tate with starry eyes while he lied about what he did and what he's charged with
Same.
Tucker has a specific style of journalism. He wants his guest to tell his story, and let the audience decide. He doesn't care for the virtue signalling. He's not concerned with what people on the outside think about him, only his inner circle. That's very healthy. He doesn't read twitter. He lives in a silo. He's not afraid if someone calls him an Antisemite, or a racist, cause he KNOWS he's not.
At different times Tucker affirmed that he believes America is not to be morally equated with Germany or Russia in WWII. But Tucker has legitimate questions, and if the only ones asking or saying certain things, have brought them to these sorts of conclusions, then what can we expect?
Right now, people are making the pitch that Putin invading Ukraine is the same as Hitler invading Poland. That's the problem! Just stop it! Putin is not Hitler! That's the entire point! That's what Churchill saw. The fact that people are saying that to justify another world war, obviously begs the question; what if what I see about Putin is also true about Hitler?
That's where we are...
Tucker Carlson is not and never has been a journalist.
@@llharrison77 Sorry way too many "dates" at this point. What was "10/7"?
People have been talking, writing about, and questioning ww2 during, and every day since. I've lost any respect that I once had for tucker. I never had any respect for Candace.
They have both gone off the rails.
They’ve shown us who they are since Oct 7th
It's wrong to question?
@@joecasey7415 history will tell you the truth when you look at it, especially in regards to the world wars.
@@joecasey7415 according to radical zionists, yes, it is bad to question their "chosen ones" narrative. No self awareness.
How did Churchill start WWII when he didn’t become PM until 1940??
Hitler openly talked about needing to liquidate the Slavs in Mein Kampf, that alone would obviate the argument that not having enough food for the prisoners of the Eastern Front. Pure tripe.
yeah? Where exactly in Mein Kampf does he say that, citation needed. And if he felt that way, why was he so accommodating to Czechs and especially Slovaks, not to mention Croats?
Can you cite the page in Mein Kampf where Hitler said that?
@@joecasey7415 trust me, he can't, he doesn't say that anyone should be killed in MK, it's not that kind of book.
@@toobalkain That's my understanding. We all see how much they lie and lie about current events and recent history...but we are supposed to believe what we are told about WWII and the Nazis
@@joecasey7415what is your understanding?
Disappointed that Musk would promote such nonsense. This left wing, right wing, and Islamic antisemitism combo is getting scary.
It’s not antisemitism to state facts. 109 countries.
@@Beef-Or-Queef That's your argument? lol, what a dolt.
@richiecooke1984 in most countries of the world women, gays did not have the same rights as straight men. What's your point, N*ziboy?
@richiecooke1984 most (probably all) countries in the world didn't or still don't have equal rights for women, gays and other minorities as they do for straight men. What's your point, N*ziboy?
@@Beef-Or-Queefsaying it's not antisemitism because there was so much antisemitism?
That is the dumbest argument ever.
“you can never talk about it”, as they continuously talk about it
They always whine about how “you can’t criticize Jews” AS THEY ARE DOING IT!, 😂 it’s insane
Daniel, Kirk and Yonaton, you guys are great.
I’m sorry I tried watch this episode but the second I heard Tucker’s voice I couldn’t do it
I am about done with Tucker. A month or two ago he said there could have been no reason to have used the atom bombs to end WW2, like Truman was just insane, and he never heard of Okinawa, Iwo Jima, Manila, Peleliu, Saipan--and the casualty estimates (Japanese and American) for invading Japan, and a dozen other reasons. Then he interviewed a priest from a West Bank church who said that Israel was responsible for all the prejudices against Christians in the West Bank, a story that has been told and debunked numerous times over the decades since 1967. And now, this travesty.
Yes, Churchill was a complicated person, not all heroic by any means. But this latest is just ridiculous. And, sorry, but the Germans knew they would take millions of Soviet prisoners in 1941, and decided not to feed them and to let them starve because the Slavs would all be either enslaved or killed, in any case, so, why bother?
My Dad was on the USS Comstock on his way to land invasion of Japan. He was 17. No combat experience. The only thing he ever said about it was that he was sure he was going to die. Those bombs saved him. We had tried everything else. Carpet bombing. Blockades. No surrender until the second bomb was dropped and the Emperor stepped in.
@@JulieB-k3h I believe that. I don't think people realize how dedicated the Japanese were at the time. I've seen archival footage of civilians (women with their children) jumping off cliffs instead of surrendering. Tucker is old enough to be my father and it's so irritating that his rationale for use of force rivals that of a preteen girl. I wonder what he would have said if the b0mbß were never dropped and the US cásualty total would have numbered in the high six figures.
@@llharrison77 He's an isolationist. I dropped him several years ago. And since he got booted from FOX his ego has become massive.
@@JulieB-k3h I agree you're truly an isolationist when you ignore the aggression of bad actors and criticize the aggrieved for retaliating.
Ok,I just listened to this guy's alternative history and lowkey Hitler apologism, Why is Tucker just nodding along and not challenging him on any of these obvious fallacies? That's not the Tucker Carlson I used to watch
He was and is nazi. Why deny the facts. When related to Israel and Jews, he always invites Jew-hating liars, never those on Israeli side.
On-brand for Tucker.
Tucker wasn't there nor was the
Historian !
My Dad saw
Bergen Belson first
hand !
I'll believe what my
farther told me !
He was driving one of the bulldozers
burrying the bodies !
He saw the lampshades made
of human skin !
He saw the brothel's with little children in them .
He saw and could smell Bergen Belson !
and some of those old guys are still alive ....
Tucker ,like Candice should be a bit more respectful
to truth !
and my granddad
saw the concentration camps of the Boer
war too !
Denying truth is
EVIL !
shame on anyone
who believes this crap .!
God bless you and your family
And did nobody tell your father that the lampshades the soap shrunken heads were al faked for anti germany propaganda, he probably raped german children because I heard that,
One day, right or wrong, all can be forgotten. Like with the Israel contra "Palestine" case, people will then have to reduce the issue down to what they actually know. In the case of Nazis, we know they are evil per their own ideology. Thankfully, that is quite enough to think that lampshades (whether that in particular happened or not) indeed could easily have happened given such evil as we know they stand for.
Baloney. It was a concentration camp. All the death camps were supposedly in Poland and Ukraine. There were no lampshades made of human skin. The Brits and Canadians liberated that camp, not America
I think more people need to watch The Liberation of Dachau. It is the most horrifying thing I have ever watched.
I love Tucker and free speech. The more conversations the better.
LOL at Kirk's Tucker face in the beginning 😂😂
😂
I was wondering why he was doing that
Great podcast, you got into details and touched all the points I've had when heard Tucker, he's absolutely out of his mind
He is. He's just opening his eyes to the propaganda on WW2. Be ready for getting what you deserve for all your lies.
This sounds like a similar revisionist narrative to Pat Buchanan’s book Churchill, Hitler, and The Unnecessary War.
Don’t defend Nazis. Especially original Nazis during WW2. Don’t defend them. Past or present.
Never defend the Bolsheviks either.
Who did that?
@@gandydancer9710 The bolsheviks where J3ws
Excellent rule of thumb!
109 countries.
Always nice to see an unabashed Jew-hater.
I liked his show on Fox, but let's face it, he isn't very educated. He was just mostly reading off a script. He currently falls into the camp of "it's the opposite of wjat the media says so it must be true"
No. we should hold people accountable for their actions. Pretty hard to feign ignorance at this point about something like the holocaust..
You'd think so, but a lot of people are actually ignorant about it. Tucker carlson is nearing his 60s. Even if did learn anything about it at school, I dount he cared enough to remember. Not white and Christian - not his problem.
uh sorry little buddy that strat has a pretty high hit rate but plz keep being a good little goy lol
It's amazing to hear people openly state revisionist history.
When Carlson started praising Alex Jones and Joe Rogan it became clear the guy was so much less than he first appeared to be.
Nothing wrong with Alex Jones or Joe.
Both Jo and Alex are learning all the time. Jo has had the best minds on his long form podcasts. Nothing wrong with him
@@ca8944plenty wrong with both of them
@@hyperreal what exactly? Alex Jones has been right 90%percent of the time and he isn’t saying anything new about the deep state and globalists.
Joe Rogan is harmless and has changed much of his stances on being a socialist.
@@hyperreal what exactly? Alex Jones has been right 90%percent of the time and he isn’t saying anything new about the deep state and globalists.
Joe Rogan is harmless and has changed much of his stances on being a socialist.
How could the Germans throw in with the Nazis? Read Hayek's The Road to Serfdom. He talks about how the socialists and statist thinking led directly to Naziism, which was just a different form of what they already had. Even down to the socialist youth groups that were just converted into the Hitler Youth. It was not a radical change. It is not like the Germans in the 1920s were libertarians and suddenly became statists.
Before Weimar, the Kaiser (King).
Weimar was a mix of Social Democrats, other socialists, Communists who founded Antifa, as well as conservatives.
The Communists and Nazis teamed up to defeat the Social Democrats.
Weimar was the most progressive regime in Europe
An excellent chapter of the book. Read it just recently
The idea that the Versailles Treaty was abnormally “unfair” to Germany is a myth, specifically the “war guilt clause”, which actually does not exist. The clause reads as follows:
“The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.”
You’ll notice it doesn’t single out Germany here, but Germany *and her allies*, and further more it is talking about responsibility for damages inflicted by the Central Powers during the war, not about who started what.
This myth is very pervasive today, scarily so, and is even taught in American schools. The worst part is that this narrative comes from German propaganda at the time, and of course later on, Nazi Propaganda. These are the *real* lies told in our schools, *not* the Holocaust or the pure evil of Hitler and the Nazi movement.
This was such a bizarre interview. Darryl Cooper has really lost his marbles.
He is not historian, but in society where overwhelming majority are so ignorant and prejudiced against Jews his demonic lies are willingly accepted.
I don't think he ever had them.
Saying what?
Thank you very much! And special thanks to Daniel, specially for the last 30 seconds!👍❤️
Lol 3 dorks with a grade 4 understanding of history critiquing a historian who studied the topic for thousands of hours. Rich
The above comment is observed by the courtesy of a single Grade 3 dork. Richer!
Sorry, Kirk, but the Right is much faster, infinitely faster, to reconsider support than the Left is. Most of the Right is simply asking questions about Ukraine, questions that few seem willing to even address.
Is this a meeting of "White dudes for Harris"? 😂
I love Candace and Tucker:) ❤️
I have no clue who kirk wilcox is but that face is priceless!!!! The best think I have seen in much time! Thank you!
Subscribe to him, he’s awesome
Great panel, guys, thanks.
No clue how the algorithm got me here but I think I watched the same video that Tucker did and I didnt see any glaring inaccuracies. He makes it very clear that you will criticize him and here you are.
Question everything. History is written by the victors to warp his-story.
Absolutely, just make sure you actually have something to question.
Agreeing to an interpretation based purely on speculation because it aligns with your political views isn’t being a free thinker, it’s being an ideologue.
@@janewhite572 welcome to ayn rand uk.. isnt it great
Another great commentary video. I really appreciate the way you guys draw on the principles espoused by Ayn Rand, without ever falling into the trap of becoming obsessed with "peace" to such a degree that there is no level of evil that would warrant abandoning that peace. It's so refreshing to see there are still people willing to give a full throated defense of personal liberty, right alongside a proud tradition of protecting that liberty through the obvious necessity of nation states and their collective armed forces. So many "libertarians" (Dave smith, the Mises Caucus etc.) seem to have adopted the idea that individual freedom requires you abandon all international alliances like NATO, because guys like Putin might feel threatened by them. And just abandon all those countries that would be threatened by doing so.
Stay awesome!
Look at people denying a historian who actually studied history.....
He may have '"studied" it, that still doesn't mean he's also telling the truth. 🙄
You strike me as one of those who *never* doubted Faucci's narrative (AKA Mr Science!), not even at the very end, probably boosted up the wazoo and tripled masked outside or while being by yourself at home or in the car...😆
Tucker sucks!
You can play Twitter vids at 2x, I always do and it is very efficient. Daniel, I have to comment on your comment from a previous show about why you refuse to call Judea and Samaria by its proper name. You refuse to do so because Israel is doing the wrong thing in that area so you will not use the name of the area that Israel uses? So you would rather fuel Israel-hater propaganda war against the existence of Israel? In that war it is essential to call the area the western bank of the Jordan River. Just some geographical area floating around in the world. On the ground ALL THE SIGNS and people say this is Judea and Samaria. By not using the correct terms your are helping spread a big lie. Please reconsider your position.
Kirk's behavior/face making at the beginning of many shows is so off-putting and immature it takes away from the seriousness that the movement desires.
@@BitcoinMeister you raise an interesting point about not calling it West Bank. It suggests that it's a vacant plot of land that has never been inhabited. Honest question, why do you think Daniel is wrong about what Israel needs to do?
@@llharrison77 I am not exactly sure what he wants Israel to do there. In theory he could be right, my bigger point is he should just call the place my the correct name if he wants Israel to get out of this mess.
@@BitcoinMeister I think Israel shoudl return to Pre-Oslo state, occupy gaza as well as all the areas given to PA and place the people under military regime similar to how it did after the independence war with the Arab population & Golan Heights until the people are ready to be integrated into the larger Israeli society. Judea & Samaria is the correct administrative term for areas in the West Bank controlled by Israel, but referring to cities like Ramallah as "part of Judea & Samaria" is just delusional, acting like Israel controls what it doesn't and willingly gave up, Israel made a huge mistake with the Oslo Accords in needs to correct. Until then West Bank just seems a more appropriate term to refer to the region.
Time to do a reaction video to Dave Smith’s reaction on the Daryl Cooper interview
Dave smith: Sorry for being a Jew! Img yes. The poor nazis, they were so misunderstood! Did I already say I'm sorry for being a Jew? Please kill me last!
Love you guys and your brilliance!
I can't BELIEVE I listened to a half hour of this topic only to hear 3 things everybody knows.
How did you get 6 million? (No answer)
Churchill drank and could have entered earlier. (Well, yeah.)
Tucker don't push back too much. (Well, yeah again.)
I had to stop watching there.
Wasting my day.
Why does the public need to be reeducated about the holocaust again and again?
Because they never were educated on it in the first place and now hang out in antisemitix circles full of Holocaust deniers
Otherwise people will learn from history
@@ahappyimago as evidenced by Gaza
@@BernadottesGhost there’s 0 connection between the Holocaust and Gaza but sure keep repeating it and some idiots will believe you.
Probably because a lot of it isnt true
You need to watch all of it.
For Tucker to sit there and nod his head to through the interview - unbelievable!
Nothing Carlson does would surprise me, you can fool some of the people some of the time but not ALL the people ALL the time!
I (still an Objectivist, still fully on the side of Israel contra Hamas -albeit a bit tired of the content spree-, etc) split hairs with you guys a lot these day, but Kirk said it all by making that face. Never forget: Tucker would ban self driving cars "immediately!"
Tucker also said that he would lie to the public about the justification for doing so
@@KirkWilcox ugh... That "man" is like a ready made caricature for the lefts propaganda of anyone that may oppose them.
Tucker is a truth teller.
Also, one can actually think of WW2 as beginning with Hitler’s enabling of Franco to begin the brutal dictatorship in Spain in the Spanish Civil War. Hitler had plentiful of terrible evil acts on his dance card.
The " collaboration "of two identities during WWII is key to all arguments.
Thanks for doing this. That interview was a little weird. The guy’s take on the Germans’ concern for the welfare of Soviet prisoners (and civilians) is an abomination. Revisionist BS.
I actually believe Tucker and Darryl. Thank you
Great show🎉
Somebody in the live chat said "Guy with the glasses must be an incel." 🤣🤣🤣Exactly my thoughts while watching him revealing his madness.
Only fruity types know what that means.
I sure don't care to learn fruity flag language....
Thanks!
Thank you, jmp9898!
tucker is a nightmare.
Every passing day convinces me further that Earth is just a reality show for the lowest caste of an alien civilization.
You oversimplified h0l0c@ust denial to a simple it did happen/it didn’t happen binary. The fact is denial laws create a difficulty in analysing various aspects that would relate to the attribution of guilt. It’s very important that a specific dubious narrative be told that assigns guilt in a conclusive predetermined way and if what you say is perceived in any way as decreasing or redirecting or casting doubt on where the guilt is out you will get legal problems.
YOUR ALLOWED TO ASK QUESTIONS BUT OUR ANSWERS CAN GET US ARRESTED.
Why not contact Tucker?
"The most important popular historian working in the United States today", according to Carlson. Yet Cooper has never written a book in his life, according to Niall Ferguson.
Douglas Murray is right. The West has decided that we can't have any heroes anymore, including Churchill. How did we get here?
Technically there was a Clerical authorization conservative (Francoist) regime in Austria 🇦🇹 technically.
Man in the High Castle got the end plot correct but the rulers wrong. It will be the Islamic Republik of Am'rika.
I am subscribing just for KW face
Is Tucker agreeing or exposing him ?
Tucker is great not on everything of course but I don’t hate based on them agreeing with everything I believe either.
They made it illegal to say because its true
Can't ask questions? Have they heard the squad? Those two are only victims of their own egos. I'd never heard of Darryl Cooper.
I have an issue not only with the historical inaccuracies, but the main rhetoric or language used is concerning. That some jews 'ended up dead' ... Like it was all passive and couldn't be prevented. Thats dangerous. There were people performing the killing, they didnt just end up dead. Wpuld love to hear all your opinions on Ordinary Men, the book researching the branch of the SS that went into Poland with Operation Barbarossa. Thanks!
Tucker used to be much more reasonable, but lately, the last few years he’s become unhinged and gone down the religious wacko road as well. Not sure what happened to him, but he’s gone nuts.
No. It isn’t good that he is being portrayed as reprehensible.
Like a lot of analysts and commentators, Tucker's right about Ukraine, and wrong about Israel.
Tucker is a Nazi and doesn't have the faintest idea about politics or history...
"Witches are not real" (approx 14:20)
Weird hand movements from the 'historian'
What's wrong with the Jesus looking guy's face 😂
If you can't ask questions then how can they offer evidence against the history we currently conclude? Either: you can ask questions or you cannot offer such evidence. This is basic protocol of inquiry, critical analysis. It seems to be lost on the masses.
These are not real questions. They are like saying, "Getting to the moon sounds technologically impossible to me, but I'm just asking questions" (wink wink)
...
.... after five minutes....i change "the channel."...
Rewriting of history as seen through woke glasses. Feh..
Ignorence is king.
All 3 of you.
Darryl Cooper is A) a historian the same way I'm from the planet Krypton and B) terminally mentally broken and cannot be fixed.
Elon did delete the tweet where he had promoted it.
Guys, there is no need to belabor the stuff about 'being humanitarian by killing the prisoners'. You are kind of putting things into his mouth: he did not say that it would have been a good thing, or that the Germans were actually doing that. Also, he did not explicitly say that this had anything to do with the Holocaust (although he did mention that these were not only prisoners of war but also civilians). He merely quoted a German Kommandant who apparently wrote a letter in desperation asking the German leadership whether it would be more humane to kill them instead of letting them starve to death.
The problem with his short description of the Russia campaign by the Germans was that he didn't directly mention anything about the Holocaust which was already ongoing in occupied Poland and then continued with a vengeance during the Russia campaign. If - by talking about the starving civilians in the camps - he wanted to say that this was all that the Germans did to the Jews, then he is in denial of historical facts: even David Irving, who is skeptical about the gas chambers in Auschwitz fully acknowledges that the Germans shot large numbers of Jews from the beginning of their Russia campaign. But, to me it is not clear that he wanted to say that.
Is he a Holocaust denier? I think the relevant parts of the interview with Tucker don't allow to conclude that. For that, more should be known about his stance on this.
I guess this “historian” would find the context in which calling for genocide is ok
The Holocaust is a religion. You’d never see this much backlash regarding Pol Pot or the Armenian genocide
What does the Holocaust have to do with the day we live in now?
🤔
@@CptChandler palistinians didn't send Jews to the gas chambers. Totally the opposite. Arabs overwhelmingly help Jews before Zionism......
This guy is just paid to spout this garbage. Total none sense. It’s just to waste our time trying to debate an endless regurgitated circular BS.
Why is this “historian” conflating Russian POW’s with the “Final Solution?” Those were separate atrocities.
He's actually conflating Russians being starved to death in Siberian gulags being run by Juze, sorry I meant Bolsheviks.
Fellas please. The grotesque anti-intellectualism on display here would shock a smart teenager. Among your gems "I haven't listened yet but he seems like a...., Austria didn't become Nartjie like Germany etc etc etc. . I'm not wasting more of my time with this foolishness.
Waiting to hear the holocaust denial or anti semitism your analysis claimed to reveal ...
There are non what-so-ever. We have 3 kids who haven't dived into history other than wikepedia who are playing wannabe heroes fighting unrevealed denial... waste of time watching this.
Absolutely correct. Just because “they” control the narrative and are happy to see England be “less English” doesn’t mean that “they” (whoever they are) are Jews. Sure, this is, almost verbatim, the same logic Nazis used but he never actually said it. “They” are just wealthy global elites that have international authority to maintain narratives and punish the Everyman.
Of course, Churchill never actually said “I’m starting WW2” so likewise the jury is still out.
Whiners.
When a cheap conspiracy theorist calls himself a historian, it shows that today anyone can claim any title-perhaps even a Neo N@__ zi.
Tucker simping for Islam? Who would've thought?
You'd prefer if he simped for Jews/Israel?
What does this channel have to do with Ayn Rand? It should be re-named 'the anti-Semite police'
Which is an important role today. Ayn Rand was Jewish by the way.
Go back to Hustlers academy and paying Tates webcam girls so he can afford a few more spins on his Ferari before rotting in prison
@@gigiizzy5651 The Tates drive a Buga'i. Paid for by pimping out peasant girls and fleecing lonely desperate men.
@@gigiizzy5651 Do you have an actual argument, or do you just like wasting your time emoting online to random strangers?
@@jazura2 Ayn Rand was a Russian-American atheist. She was not 'Jewish'.
And while I agree that pointing out antisemitism is important, there are plenty of other resources that do this, so these people shouldn't be hijacking an objectivist channel to further an unrelated agenda.
Theses guys are lame shills
They made it illegal to say because its true