Siskel & Ebert - Point Break (1991)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
  • Siskel and Ebert reviews an American action film "Point Break" starring Patrick Swayze and Keanu Reeves in July 10, 1991. It is a mixed review because Gene gave a marginal thumbs down and thought that the film had a couple of endings, but Roger gave a marginal thumbs up and liked the certain parts of the film, and the strong relationship between Keanu Reeves and Patrick Swayze. I agree with Roger, I enjoyed this film a lot. A marginal thumbs up for me on "Point Break".
    Point Break (1991) 3.5/4 👍👍👍
    #siskelandebert #pointbreak
    siskelebert.org/

Комментарии • 119

  • @wolfwiles
    @wolfwiles 4 месяца назад +10

    Siskel is always ready to make sure no one else in the room has a good time

  • @Atomykpimp
    @Atomykpimp 3 года назад +40

    I saw Point Break and T2 in the theater back in 91 in the same weekend. I couldn’t sleep for two days due to the adrenaline rush I had.

    • @AndrewVallows
      @AndrewVallows 7 месяцев назад +2

      Killer rush

    • @apocalypsepow
      @apocalypsepow 3 месяца назад

      James Cameron was married to the director of Point Break

    • @JHM83-eh6qi
      @JHM83-eh6qi 3 месяца назад

      Can’t beat a summer movie season from the 90s. In fact, from that decade I can’t recall a bad one!

    • @bobcobb3654
      @bobcobb3654 Месяц назад

      My dad took me to Point Break because T2 was sold out. We caught the late show of T2 afterward. One of my all time favorite theatrical experiences.

    • @jameswilliams-zr8co
      @jameswilliams-zr8co 25 дней назад

      summer 1991 was so awesome.. point break, boyz n the hood, T2, city slickers

  • @Feoktistovs
    @Feoktistovs 4 года назад +45

    This film is a certified classic.

    • @errolbourgeois8230
      @errolbourgeois8230 3 года назад +3

      It's a classic and did not have to be remade.

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 2 года назад +1

      No, it's a fairly unique film with some nice moments, but major flaws. The dialogue is often trite and the story meanders way too much.

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 2 года назад +1

      No, it's unique, but seriously flawed. Good premise, but terrible screenplay, script, and editing.

    • @ricomajestic
      @ricomajestic Год назад

      @@alankoslowski9473 Whatever you come up with a classic then! Where is your script?

  • @gage6209
    @gage6209 4 года назад +31

    The skydiving scenes are still will always be stunning.

  • @jackedkerouac4414
    @jackedkerouac4414 3 года назад +32

    1991 was an incredible summer for movies. Point Break, T2, Boyz N the Hood, Naked Gun 2 1/2, City Slickers, Rocketeer...

    • @Daniel-fq5vq
      @Daniel-fq5vq 3 года назад +1

      Well said that is a great observation about those old classic, summer blockbusters

    • @Danimal77
      @Danimal77 3 года назад +2

      Naked Gun 2 1/2 wasn't incredible. Funny, but nowhere near so as the first Naked Gun.

    • @offspringfan1288
      @offspringfan1288 Год назад +3

      Silence of the Lambs, Backdraft, Thelma & Louise, Last Boy Scout..

  • @ricomajestic
    @ricomajestic Год назад +5

    When the two disagreed about a movie, Ebert usually it had it right!

  • @cinemalights2625
    @cinemalights2625 2 года назад +15

    Point Break is a great lesson in screenwriting. There are no good guys and bad guys, just people whose actions are driven by their beliefs. It’s that type of nuance that makes movies more than just entertainment, but meaningful. You don’t see enough studio movies like that today.

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 2 года назад +1

      No, while the premise is fairly unique and it has some nice scenes, the screenwriting is awful. The dialogue is trite and the story meanders. With a better script and editing it might've been great rather than memorably flawed.

    • @jedijones
      @jedijones Год назад

      Robbing banks is bad though. 😋

    • @cinemalights2625
      @cinemalights2625 Год назад +2

      @@jedijones Effective storytelling is more than just good and bad.

    • @closed11609
      @closed11609 4 месяца назад +1

      @@jedijonesnerd

  • @FeverDog420
    @FeverDog420 4 года назад +25

    Gene Siskel didn't like an awesome movie, what a surprise.

    • @jeffwolfe4058
      @jeffwolfe4058 3 года назад +5

      If it's not some obscure Croatian film about 2 fisherman down on their luck Siskel ain't biting.

    • @jameswilliams-zr8co
      @jameswilliams-zr8co 25 дней назад

      siskel was so out of touch and clueless and knit picked pathetic things, wtf lol

    • @Kruppt808
      @Kruppt808 15 дней назад

      ​@@jeffwolfe4058😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @scninja07
    @scninja07 4 года назад +29

    Point Break and Boys n the Hood on the same review show. WOW. Two thumbs up for that.

    • @mattangel7844
      @mattangel7844 4 года назад +1

      👊

    • @Jbaxter85
      @Jbaxter85 3 года назад

      👍😉

    • @abdulhouser
      @abdulhouser 2 года назад

      Loved both of them!! The summer of '91 was one of the best, in my opinion.

    • @CaptainSpalding72
      @CaptainSpalding72 10 месяцев назад

      they were released the same week in 1991, genius.

  • @nathanslay6342
    @nathanslay6342 3 года назад +15

    I am with Ebert here! I love this movie! It’s a great movie!!

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 2 года назад +1

      I'm with Siskel. While it's fairly unique and has some nice scenes, there are also major flaws. The dialogue is oft trite, and as Siskel notes the story meanders. With better dialogue and editing it might've been great, but it isn't.

    • @Danimal77
      @Danimal77 Год назад +3

      @@alankoslowski9473 It's great.

    • @buffalosolider206
      @buffalosolider206 7 месяцев назад

      its great like rocky 3 is great @@Danimal77

  • @jedijones
    @jedijones 4 года назад +10

    The directors of 1991's two best thrillers each went on to win a Best Director Oscar later. They were also married to each other and divorced in 1991.

  • @citygirl5705
    @citygirl5705 5 лет назад +30

    Siskel's like "I didn't care for the film, but my argument is going to make absolutely no sense."
    Just like his stupid thumbs down reviews of "Lethal Weapon 2" and "Predator." His reasons were ridiculous.

    • @PhilipJFry-zt3yw
      @PhilipJFry-zt3yw 4 года назад

      I didn't like Predator either.

    • @offspringfan1288
      @offspringfan1288 3 года назад +5

      He also disliked The Terminator, Aliens, The Rock, True Romance, and Silence of the Lambs. Sometimes I wonder how this man ever made a career out of getting it wrong so many times.

    • @Syklonus
      @Syklonus 3 года назад +3

      @Jonathan Parks Well said. People forget that film is art and art is subjective. There is no right or wrong. There's popularity, but that's not a sign of quality, becasue quality is different fro each person.

    • @Islanders83
      @Islanders83 3 года назад +2

      Ebert understood that each movie is for a certain demographic. His reviews talked about if the movie was any good for the genre and demographic. Siskel only liked certain types of movies and hated if any scene was similar to a movie he liked 25 years ago. That’s why ebert was more liked.

    • @CaptainSpalding72
      @CaptainSpalding72 10 месяцев назад

      @@PhilipJFry-zt3ywmoron

  • @GrantKanigan
    @GrantKanigan 3 года назад +11

    I miss these two. Even though I disagreed with them quite often, I’d still know what they thought of the film and how their taste compared to mine. There’s an art to how they critiqued movies that’s gone by the wayside now

  • @navylaks2
    @navylaks2 2 года назад +5

    10 years later, they remade this picture as The Fast and the Furious

    • @jedijones
      @jedijones Год назад +1

      And as Point Break again. 🙄

  • @jameswitt645
    @jameswitt645 3 года назад +8

    Gene "my problem with the picture" Siskel. He couldn't just ever enjoy a movie for what it was.

  • @GlorifiedTruth
    @GlorifiedTruth 3 года назад +8

    To me, this movie is the dictionary definition of "guilty pleasure." It doesn't aim for the sky, but it's great for what it is. The element of ridiculousness works because the film embraces and really runs with it. So glad they didn't tear it to shreds. Ultimately, though, it's no skin off my nose whether they like it or hate it, or shouldn't be, anyway.

  • @robgiavanno6200
    @robgiavanno6200 Год назад +5

    Movie is f@&$ing awesome, period. Ebert knows what he is talking about and Gene makes people think how the fu@$ did this guy get to be a movie critic!

  • @robdela3632
    @robdela3632 3 года назад +6

    Bought this movie from Columbia house back in the day. Watched this movie so many times 😂

    • @jedijones
      @jedijones Год назад +1

      I just bought the Blu-ray on eBay to watch it again. I probably only saw it twice before.

  • @csscott9803
    @csscott9803 4 года назад +13

    Amazing film

  • @LurgsHowToGuides
    @LurgsHowToGuides 4 года назад +5

    Greatest movie of all time

  • @JakobKsGarage
    @JakobKsGarage 4 года назад +9

    Such a great movie!

  • @danieltadros3262
    @danieltadros3262 4 года назад +10

    Mr. Ebert was right. A very good movie.This film is based on a real group of bank robbers called the Stop Watch Gang. They were the last great bank robbers in American history. Please Google this name if you want to know more.

    • @Syklonus
      @Syklonus 3 года назад +2

      There is no right or wrong. People can dislike a film and it's just as valid.

    • @matthewschwartz6607
      @matthewschwartz6607 4 месяца назад

      They sound familiar.

    • @jameswilliams-zr8co
      @jameswilliams-zr8co 25 дней назад

      @@Syklonus wrong, there IS a right and wrong when reviewing movies, you either are accurate and honest, or biased, shallow and clueless

  • @nathanslay6342
    @nathanslay6342 3 года назад +6

    Excellently done action too that’s well shot!

  • @Jbaxter85
    @Jbaxter85 5 лет назад +21

    Point break is clever intelligent action thriller that the surfers dressed as ex-presidents while robbing banks, great chase scenes. It has little bit of cop buddy genre, football, sky diving & lots of surfing, it's a fun adventure.

  • @DH-pz7bc
    @DH-pz7bc Год назад +1

    Love all the action scenes in Point Break. Especially skydiving scenes. Very well made. Gene Siskel is just nitpicking at a great classic movie.

  • @ivanavila7708
    @ivanavila7708 Год назад +1

    I still remember the day I watched it when I was in college. It's been ages since Hollywood made a movie this good.

  • @fabiobonetta5454
    @fabiobonetta5454 Год назад +4

    Gene's problem with the movie is that a bank robber's wearing a Regan mask

    • @jameswilliams-zr8co
      @jameswilliams-zr8co 25 дней назад

      @jameswilliams-zr8co
      siskel was so clueless,, he gave thumbs down to predator, the crow, aliens, point break, boogie nights, casino, scilence of the lambs,, wtf gene lol

  • @Danimal77
    @Danimal77 3 года назад +3

    It seemed like Gene was really nitpicking here. He just seemed grumpy.

  • @playerthirteen9695
    @playerthirteen9695 2 года назад +1

    Point Break, Terminator II, Boyz n the hood. What a time to be alive.

  • @mniscmoney
    @mniscmoney 4 года назад +3

    Agree with the "couple of endings" comment. I watched it a few months ago and I remember it felt like it was building to an ending about 3 different times in the last half hour and then just kept going. Looks like it's going to end at the failed bank heist... wait, it keeps going. Looks like it'll end with Keanu Reeves and Gary Busey confronting Swazye's crew at the airfield... keeps going. Okay, Keanu Reeves and Patrick Swayze's confrontation after the skydive sequence is where it'll definitely en... WHAT DO YOU MEAN THERE'S ONE MORE FIGHT BETWEEN THE TWO AFTER THAT?!

    • @jedijones
      @jedijones Год назад +2

      So give it points for being unpredictable.

  • @Me-gs3uu
    @Me-gs3uu 3 года назад +3

    I usually disagree with Siskel, I think his reasonings don’t often make sense. But I agree with him on this one. I found the movie entertaining, but every movie cliche you could possibly think of is in this movie. It’s fun and exciting, but the dialogue is terrible, and the jokes aren’t funny at all. I give it a C-

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 2 года назад +1

      Exactly. I like the premise, but the execution is lacking. With a better screenplay, script, and editing it might've been very good, maybe even great, rather than memorably flawed.

    • @CaptainSpalding72
      @CaptainSpalding72 10 месяцев назад

      thats the point.

  • @jonvisser1509
    @jonvisser1509 Месяц назад

    Boy was Siskel off on Point Break. 30 years later absolute classic. Movies music really meant to be enjoyed not over analysised. Obviously some plot holes. But way better than modern movies like Fast and furious and John Wick.

    • @jameswilliams-zr8co
      @jameswilliams-zr8co 25 дней назад +1

      siskel was so clueless,, he gave thumbs down to predator, the crow, aliens, point break, boogie nights, casino, scilence of the lambs,, wtf gene lol

  • @Nathan-gd7xq
    @Nathan-gd7xq 3 года назад +3

    Gene didn't like the ending in Australia? Neither did most Australians.

  • @jainee4507
    @jainee4507 10 месяцев назад

    Siskel shut up Ebert real quick at the end when he mentioned T2 😂😂

  • @The_Digital_Dolphin
    @The_Digital_Dolphin 9 месяцев назад

    One of the best, most quotable films ever.

  • @davidpaulplanchard3104
    @davidpaulplanchard3104 3 года назад +5

    Siskels reasoning for not liking the movie was ridiculous

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 2 года назад +1

      Disagree. It's a decent premise, but the screenplay and script are terrible, and it needs better editing. It had decent potential, but it wasn't realized.

    • @jameswilliams-zr8co
      @jameswilliams-zr8co 25 дней назад

      siskel was so clueless,, he gave thumbs down to predator, the crow, aliens, point break, boogie nights, casino, scilence of the lambs,, wtf gene lol

  • @MarjorieEarlDean
    @MarjorieEarlDean 3 года назад +3

    Siskel didn't like them doin the ex-Presidents voices?! Are they suppose to be silent? 🤦That's what made it funny. Tryin to find negatives that just aren't there. It was the Siskel way.

  • @metaphysicsclimatechange
    @metaphysicsclimatechange Год назад

    Ebert was feeling the surfers.

  • @sukottoshinobe7360
    @sukottoshinobe7360 Год назад

    Siskel is viewing it for the film it is. Ebert is seeing the story itself for what it’s meant to show. Beyond the cheesiness the premise itself is what makes the movie powerful. The product is cheesy but the premise is art

  • @adrianelsby9249
    @adrianelsby9249 2 месяца назад

    Great movie. 👍

  • @orlandoruizjr3834
    @orlandoruizjr3834 Год назад +1

    Siskel has missed the mark on too many movies. This guy gave thumbs down to Taxi Driver, Apocalypse Now, Indiana Jones And The Last Crusade, The Silence of the Lambs. All for nitpicky reasons. Same thing going on with Point Break. He just liked to nitpick.

  • @seancuebas2332
    @seancuebas2332 Год назад

    The little hand says it time to rock n roll!!

  • @ballybunion9
    @ballybunion9 3 года назад

    What are the two false endings Siskel is talking about?

    • @bigrigJim
      @bigrigJim 3 года назад +2

      the airport shootout, where Gary Busey was killed , and remaining bad guys fly away. If that happened without Keanu going with them it could have been an ending. Then after the skydive without the parachute , guy gets the girl , and bad guy drives away in a Jeep , that clearly could have been an ending .

  • @MidnightVideo
    @MidnightVideo 2 года назад +2

    After reviewing some of their older reviews like this one, it's clear Siskel just sucks.

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 2 года назад +1

      I disagree. Roger sucks more consistently. Siskel is right about this film. It's unique, but seriously flawed.

    • @MidnightVideo
      @MidnightVideo 2 года назад +2

      @@alankoslowski9473 I'm fine with someone thinking it's flawed, but a thumbs down is absolutely ridiculous.

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 2 года назад

      @@MidnightVideo No, I'd give it a thumbs down too except for those who like dumb dialogue.

    • @MidnightVideo
      @MidnightVideo 2 года назад

      @@alankoslowski9473 lol sounds good

  • @damageinc.5458
    @damageinc.5458 4 года назад +10

    Imagine if these guys were still alive today... They wouldn't able to recommend one single movie. (2019 / present day = woke uninspired garbage)

    • @PhilipJFry-zt3yw
      @PhilipJFry-zt3yw 4 года назад +1

      Well. 2019 was a very good year for films.

    • @jackedkerouac4414
      @jackedkerouac4414 3 года назад

      @@PhilipJFry-zt3yw Yeah it was. Parasite, Joker and Glass top 3 for me

  • @Tmelton-bj3kf
    @Tmelton-bj3kf 2 года назад

    Wow so surprised to hear ebert like point break did know how he didn’t like die hard but ok

  • @mooseyman74
    @mooseyman74 2 месяца назад

    The only bad about Point Break is Keanu Reeves acting, he usually played clueless surfer dudes so playing against type. Same reason it doesn't work in Bram Stokers Dracula

  • @mattangel7844
    @mattangel7844 4 года назад +3

    Siskel has to have watched this movie on dope or something he can’t even argue it because he barely payed attention

    • @Islanders83
      @Islanders83 3 года назад

      I think he only liked certain types of movies and wasn’t open minded

  • @desmondciauri4616
    @desmondciauri4616 4 года назад +4

    One of the best movies ever made.These guys got super gay w each other

    • @bigrigJim
      @bigrigJim 3 года назад +2

      If you truly feel it is one of the best movies ever made you need to see more films. It is great for an action thriller , but it is a 3 star film , not a 4 star .

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 2 года назад +1

      One of the best ever made? That's fucking ridiculous. It's fairly unique, but the screenplay, script, and dialogue are terrible. The editing also needs work.

    • @CaptainSpalding72
      @CaptainSpalding72 10 месяцев назад

      dont recall them exchanging Ds.

  • @nebulous6660
    @nebulous6660 3 года назад

    Wow Siskel is hard to please

    • @bigrigJim
      @bigrigJim 3 года назад

      If he found a bag full of money he would complain about how heavy it was.

  • @Room-uc5se
    @Room-uc5se Год назад

    My youngest son is named Bodhi….named after this character. The poor kid always has my friends telling him “I am an FBI agent” as well as lots of “whoa” every time they see him.
    Fuckers.

  • @Islanders83
    @Islanders83 3 года назад

    Siskel wasn’t into certain types of movies, So his reviews on those movies were useless. Ebert had an open mind and gave every movie a chance.

    • @jainee4507
      @jainee4507 3 года назад +1

      Siskel was a tough critic to impress but he was the more entertaining of the two imo.

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 2 года назад

      No, I think Siskel is right. The premise is interesting, but the screenplay and script are terrible, and it needs better editing. It's a unique, but seriously flawed.

  • @ubiquitousdiabolus
    @ubiquitousdiabolus 3 года назад +2

    Awesome outside of some cheesy dialogue and Lori Petty being a stereotypical obnoxious surfer chick

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 2 года назад

      Some cheesy dialogue? Almost all of it is, and the screenplay and editing aren't very good either.

  • @edcampion3998
    @edcampion3998 3 года назад

    siskel is an awful moan