Double Integration Method Example 1: Part 3

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 дек 2024

Комментарии •

  • @JohnMakurAnyuc
    @JohnMakurAnyuc 5 месяцев назад

    You are really a great tutor, my problem is solved ❤❤

  • @NakpheyDuba
    @NakpheyDuba Год назад +1

    Thank you!

  • @Calitmc
    @Calitmc Год назад +1

    Super helpful

  • @Pain5478
    @Pain5478 3 года назад +1

    Thank you good sir!

  • @patrickndap6206
    @patrickndap6206 6 лет назад +1

    Thanks for the details!!!!!

  • @gregoryauka3237
    @gregoryauka3237 3 года назад

    Good work man, I've been struggling to read this and getting nothing 😂😂👍

  • @yodaheh465
    @yodaheh465 5 лет назад +1

    thank you!

  • @ckarmakun516
    @ckarmakun516 7 лет назад +1

    Very informative video.

  • @oyuncakteve6827
    @oyuncakteve6827 11 месяцев назад

    Nice video, thanks!

  • @MickSaddam
    @MickSaddam Год назад

    How did you get the 384?

  • @Ethan84250
    @Ethan84250 4 месяца назад

    do these equations only work if there is a UDL or do they work for a point load anywhere along the beam?

    • @l2eaper
      @l2eaper 3 месяца назад

      anywhere JUST before the point load. To the right of the point load would require singularity functions to evaluate. if the axis point is on left side

  • @goyakala8056
    @goyakala8056 4 года назад

    Best lecture

  • @desmondonomah9680
    @desmondonomah9680 2 года назад

    Good work done ✅✅

  • @sumayyahabdulla288
    @sumayyahabdulla288 2 года назад

    Thank you, this really helped :)

  • @gregoryauka3237
    @gregoryauka3237 3 года назад

    Thanks so much

  • @kshitijkushwaha3123
    @kshitijkushwaha3123 Год назад +1

    Thnxx

  • @lawpronebo3179
    @lawpronebo3179 6 лет назад +1

    TY!!

  • @tomasmik1677
    @tomasmik1677 8 лет назад +1

    thank you!!!!!

  • @martin00114
    @martin00114 Год назад

    Thank you for this video even though its 9 yr old

  • @sitisyazwani5195
    @sitisyazwani5195 8 лет назад

    Nice explaination 😊

  • @nihomestudio
    @nihomestudio 5 дней назад

    Keep it up

  • @Vathanaization
    @Vathanaization 8 лет назад

    Thanks,

  • @rahmanrahmani2896
    @rahmanrahmani2896 5 лет назад +1

    Good presentation. please organize your cals in a good order as well as neat to be followed easily. Thank you!

  • @okanaremitv4561
    @okanaremitv4561 2 года назад

    great explanation try to be neat and please write down the boundaries conditions as they are the hardest part to figure out

  • @Boyyoung150
    @Boyyoung150 7 лет назад

    Whats the value of EI ?

    • @fee68
      @fee68 6 лет назад +2

      Fabert Sosthène Sow I know it’s late since you commented about a year ago so EI is just a constante its value is irrelevant and depends on the type of the beam

    • @yaluman.
      @yaluman. Месяц назад +1

      @@fee68 after 5 yrs i found this comment relevant😁

    • @fee68
      @fee68 Месяц назад +1

      @@yaluman. Glad you did! Good luck!

  • @elimalalis7752
    @elimalalis7752 9 лет назад

    hmmm!!! i watch your video and theirs one question i want to ask??? about the final equation y=WLX^3/12 - Wx^4/24 - WL^3x/24 ... i found formula from a book and your answer is differ in SIGNS ... BOOK (y= (- WLX^3/12) + Wx^4/24 + WL^3x/24 ) ...

    • @prashantchandel9412
      @prashantchandel9412 8 лет назад

      +eliazar malalis there is no problem with that it just indicates that y that is the deflection was in opposite direction what was considered here. different book follow different sign conventions for the moment both are correct.

  • @nicnesh
    @nicnesh 8 лет назад

    nice

  • @PCgamerChannel
    @PCgamerChannel 3 года назад +1

    holy fuck these are long nice video though