Mike "Little Buddy" Jones Falsifies Flatopia with Tides - Boon Island Destroys Flatopia Part 3
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
- Sigh... I predicted in my last video that Mikey boy was too dumb to quit, and as per usual, the globe prediction came true. Mikey has been getting all giddy over a piece of footage of Boon Island taken at high tide, but he completely failed to recognise that it too destroys his social media CULT religion.
Seaside Nomad's video : • Maine Lighthouses | Nu...
UPDATE: It's more bad news for my little buddy Mikey boy I'm afraid... If I scale the tower to 133mm in the high tide footage from Nomad's video, the island height still comes out at 22ft.
So, STILL not 14ft, even at high tide. Ooops, Mikey boy, ooops. If I scale the island to 14mm, that makes the tower 80ft. Ouchy.
Cope, seethe, cope, seethe... You know the drill by now fella.
thank you for all the laughs that you're providing :D
@@DrEMichaelJones hey mikey did you notice the small building in your high tide picture? How is it obstructed at low tide so we only see the top of the roof but visible at high tide? Oh my.
@@DrEMichaelJones If I scale to the focal height of the light at 137ft in Seaside Nomad’s *HIGH TIDE* globe proving footage, I get an island height of *22ft* .
If I scale to the focal height of the light at 137ft in Taboo Conspiracy’s *LOW TIDE* globe proving photo, I get an island height of *5ft* .
That’s *17ft* gone *AWOL* when there should be *4.5ft MORE* in TC’s shot. Oh, and not a single desperately needed 14ft to be found anywhere.
Run along now. You can get back to strawmanning my numbers and attacking me personally; but just make sure you don’t bring any Flatopian evidence (no danger).
@DrEMichaelJones Taboo really tried stacking the cards in his favour, hey Mike? Low tide, a higher vantage point than he claimed (lied), and the most refractive conditions possible (over water).
But even then, poor fellow only managed to squeeze about a third of the island into his footage. Ooops.
Taboo is the new Ranty. A real globe prover.
@ReValveiT_01 you should make your next video one where you put those two tower images (shot from near and far) side-by-side. :D
Oh and look at that, the tower is the same height in the frame taken by two observers ....one a few hundred yards away and the other ten miles away. Where's that "drop" that you claimed? :D
hey mikey did you notice the small building in your high tide picture? How is it obstructed at low tide so we only see the top of the roof but visible at high tide? Oh my.
"the same height in the frame taken by two observers"
Yet the island isn't. Oops.
What do you expect? Distance doesn't shape shift objects, Mikey boy. Just when I think you can't get any stupider...
Thanks again for confirming that the top of the tower doesn't actually ever get close to the surface of the water as roohif (absurdly) claimed. Water hump debunked.
@@DrEMichaelJones Thank you for showing everyone here that you know you are wrong as you couldn't answer the question. The tower height gets you every time because it shows that your source got it wrong. Every other source says 133 ft and yours claims 123. How can you have a focal height for the light of 137 ft if the tower is only 123 ft tall? Game. Set. Match. You have no leg to stand on. Cope and seethe.
@Requiem4aDr3Am how do you get a 137' focal height above the water on a 26-30' elevation island? What's the lighthouse height in your fantasy scenario? :D
I would be wary of using the total height of the tower as a reference. At close distances it would be better to use a reference close to the length or height of whatever you are trying to calculate. The base of the tower has a diameter of 25ft. That might perhaps be a better reference.
Thank you, marc. It is indeed impossible to accurately scale an image of objects 10+ miles away
@@DrEMichaelJones
Misrepresenting what I said. Again.
10 miles is more than sufficient distance to scale subjects in an image with a useful degree of accuracy. Just look at dozens of photos of Ferris wheels on the web
@@marcg1686 you should use your posting privileges to add a link to New England Lighthouses: A Virtual Guide
salient quote: "In June 1811, General Lincoln recommended a lighthouse on Boon Island. The tower, completed by that winter, exhibited a fixed light 32 feet above the water. The first keeper, after witnessing the vulnerability of the low island (14 feet above sea level at its highest point ) to storms, left after only a few weeks."
@@marcg1686 So you need a circle in sideview in order to properly scale at long distance. Got it. Maybe you can see about putting a Ferris wheel on Boon Island.
@@DrEMichaelJones I'm going with what the Light List says. I doubt any skipper or navigator has the book you mentioned onboard or considers it a safety relevant publication.
The island is definitely not flat as evidenced by the very slight 14 feet of elevation of the island. Its rocky shoreline is clearly visible by an observer sitting on the wet sand of a beach ten miles away as shown in this video. Valvy and another weirdo named roohif claimed it is "hidden" behind a 23-foot-tall vertical hump of water but, of course, we can all clearly see the island as valvy has shown us here again.
Thanks for proving my point for me ... again. :D
hey mikey did you notice the small building in your high tide picture? How is it obstructed at low tide so we only see the top of the roof but visible at high tide? Oh my. What 14 ft elevation? All the official NOAA charts and maine gov topographic maps show it's over that. Why do you continue to try to cite from the source that had an error of 10 feet for the height of the tower and the elevation? You were corrected and still choose to share the incorrect information. Not looking good for you mikey.
@@Requiem4aDr3Am hey dreamie, the small brick pile is to the right of the tower. The NOA from the National park service says it's 14 feet. You haven't cited a single source. Name your source and cite the elevation from that source. Not looking good for you dreamie.
@@DrEMichaelJones So you couldn't answer thanks. Small brick pile? I'm talking about the building that is visible in your own shot. It has the generators inside. Yet in the TC video we are only seeing the very top of that building. How is it obstructed at low tide so we only see the top but visible at high tide? Again what 14 ft elevation? Your source was already proven to be wrong. Every other source is showing a tower height of 133 ft and 24 ft elevation. Why do you choose to ignore the NOAA charts and maine gov topographical map? It sure doesn't look good for you Mikey to keep denying facts. My source has been named multiple times over. You are the one that keeps thinking the NOAA is the NOA you tried to use. It shows that you are completely clueless.
@DrEMichaelJones
Mike's social media CULT : "The US government lie about everything"
Mike : "Except island heights".
The hypocrisy and lack of self awareness are astounding.
@@ReValveiT_01 got that NOAA chart # yet, little buddy? :D