Видео

Looking for something to attack because you can't defend your pathetic worldview there fella?

Running low on copium there, fella?

'Sup fella? Have I upset your idiotic world view and now you're looking for revenge?

Are there direct flights from Buenos Aires to South Africa? "The most popular airlines for this route are Fly Safair, TAAG Angola Airlines, LATAM Airlines, Gol Transportes Aéreos, and Aerolineas Argentinas. Buenos Aires and Johannesburg have 372 direct flights per week." LATAM, South African *12h 40m+* . It never ceases to amaze me how arrogantly confident flat earthers are in their ignorance.

By "do your own research", do you mean "binge watch every flat earth video telling me exactly what I want to hear and swallow everything uncritically and without question"? Why yes, that's exactly what you mean.

@@prorez-retrofit This one was a 2007 if I remember rightly. Sorry, no idea on your question.

Yes, words exist. Your point?

@@ReValveiT_01 horizontal is an orientation

Uh-oh, Mikey boy is crying over tiny percentage rounding errors. Funny thing though, he isn't whining about the AE map's 300% distance discrepancies over on daddy flerf DITRH's channel.

Measurements using my 9” George F. Cram Co. Classic Globe with a scale of 880 miles per 1 inch (standard 9” globe scale) rounded to the nearest 0.05” : • London to New York measures 3.8”. 3.8 x 880 = *3344 miles* . • London to Mumbai measures 5.1”. 5.1 x 880 = *4488 miles* . • San Francisco to Auckland, NZ measures 7.45”. 7.45 x 880 = *6556 miles* . • Auckland, NZ to Santiago, Chile measures 6.9”. 6.9 x 880 = *6072 miles* . • New York to Singapore measures 10.9”. 10.9 x 880 = *9592 miles* . • Southern tip of UK to southern tip of Florida measures 4.8”. 4.8 x 880 = *4224 miles* . • Southern tip of South Africa to southern tip of Argentina also measures 4.8”. 4.8 x 880 = *4224 miles* . • Auckland, NZ to Cape Town, SA measures 8.2”. 8.2 x 880 = *7216 miles* . • Buenos Aires to Perth, AU measures 9”. 9 x 880 = *7920 miles* . Everyone is free to check these distances against any source.

Looks like Mikey boy wants to "wager" his fake $250K again, so I offered to wager which measures more accurately : my desk globe or his papa flerf DITRH's AE map. He's not too keen to take that bet for "some reason".

@@ReValveiT_01This is really unfair for little Mikey boy, you used math.

Can't you read? "rounded to the nearest 0.05" Crying about rounding errors just makes you look stupid and desperate.

"that I ever claimed a flat world. Or a map of such a nonsense world" Good god you are thick. Hasn't the penny dropped yet that if you haven't got a scaled flat world map, the earth can't be flat? GLOBE - millions of accurate scaled models exist. FLAT - no accurate scaled map/model exists. Are you getting it yet? Is it sinking in to that thick skull of yours?

"desk toy" Does calling it a "toy" help to soothe the pain of your cognitive dissonance, Mikey boy? Or perhaps you're quoting from the script of your lying, back peddling high priest Dubay? Either way, "toy"s aren't useful, my desk globe is.

Measurements using my 9” George F. Cram Co. Classic Globe with a scale of 880 miles per 1 inch (standard 9” globe scale) *rounded to the nearest 0.05” * : • London to New York measures 3.8”. 3.8 x 880 = *3344 miles* . • London to Mumbai measures 5.1”. 5.1 x 880 = *4488 miles* . • San Francisco to Auckland, NZ measures 7.45”. 7.45 x 880 = *6556 miles* . • Auckland, NZ to Santiago, Chile measures 6.9”. 6.9 x 880 = *6072 miles* . • New York to Singapore measures 10.9”. 10.9 x 880 = *9592 miles* . • Southern tip of UK to southern tip of Florida measures 4.8”. 4.8 x 880 = *4224 miles* . • Southern tip of South Africa to southern tip of Argentina also measures 4.8”. 4.8 x 880 = *4224 miles* . • Auckland, NZ to Cape Town, SA measures 8.2”. 8.2 x 880 = *7216 miles* . • Buenos Aires to Perth, AU measures 9”. 9 x 880 = *7920 miles* .

@@ReValveiT_01 do the division, little buddy.

It's all in the video that you can't name a scaled flat world map on, about one minute in. Just let me know if you're too dumb to understand simple multiplication and I'll try and dumb it down further for you.

@ReValveiT_01 it's not in the video. All you said was, "Check google." Let's see the math. First, you said PERFECTLY, then you claimed 99% after I called out your initial lie. 99% is also a lie.

@@DrEMichaelJones The math IS in the video at 58 seconds. You are blind and stupid. If you can't be bothered to check the distances that's on your lazy arse.

@@DrEMichaelJones "Rounded to the nearest 0.05" Crying about rounding errors eh? The desperation is palpable. Meanwhile, you don't even have a map I can measure. Impotent religion much?

Measurements using my 9” George F. Cram Co. Classic Globe with a scale of 880 miles per 1 inch (standard 9” globe scale) *rounded to the nearest 0.05” * : • London to New York measures 3.8”. 3.8 x 880 = *3344 miles* . • London to Mumbai measures 5.1”. 5.1 x 880 = *4488 miles* . • San Francisco to Auckland, NZ measures 7.45”. 7.45 x 880 = *6556 miles* . • Auckland, NZ to Santiago, Chile measures 6.9”. 6.9 x 880 = *6072 miles* . • New York to Singapore measures 10.9”. 10.9 x 880 = *9592 miles* . • Southern tip of UK to southern tip of Florida measures 4.8”. 4.8 x 880 = *4224 miles* . • Southern tip of South Africa to southern tip of Argentina also measures 4.8”. 4.8 x 880 = *4224 miles* . • Auckland, NZ to Cape Town, SA measures 8.2”. 8.2 x 880 = *7216 miles* . • Buenos Aires to Perth, AU measures 9”. 9 x 880 = *7920 miles* .

"BWAHHHHHH". Stop crying and name the scaled flat world map that you claim.

@@ReValveiT_01 make a video of when I claimed a flat world.

@@DrEMichaelJones Your attempts to backpedal away from not having a scaled flat world map for your Flatopian religion isn't going to work, fella. Word games don't work here.

@ReValveiT_01 make a video for me, little buddy. Surely, video 9 will be the one that gives you the comfort you need.

@@DrEMichaelJones Educating your ass has been a monumental chore, but you finally understand that desk globes are accurately scaled models of planet globe earth, and scaled flat world maps do not exist. Now, go forward and be slightly less dumb.

You just posted. You still have the freedom, idiot. Why do you keep insisting on showing everyone what a big whiny baby flerf you are? Is that your kink at play again?

@@ReValveiT_01 lol you need an echo chamber over there just to cope and seethe together with your deluded weirdo buddies.

@@ReValveiT_01 lol you need an echo chamber over there just to cope and seethe together with your deluded weirdo buddies.

@@ReValveiT_01 you: "OK. Mikey boy finally plucked up the courage to name a SCALED FLAT WORLD MAP." Lol when do I get my admin rights? :D YOU wrote those words, not me, little buddy. :D They're in the same thread where you're now disavowing your own words.

@@ReValveiT_01 Are you still wondering why other people ban you from their channels? :D

Not to mention the fact that desk globes are far too small to display even the most basic road detail. This pretend doctor is all kinds of deluded.

@@toastthehostwiththemosttoa9922 Indeed. Dumb flerfs believe we should all be driving around with 200ft wide globes strapped to our dashboards to navigate 50 miles down the road.. They think everyone is as stupid as they are.

Paused overnight to prevent your spam. I'm always 50 steps ahead of you, Mikey boy. Got the name of that SCALED flat world map that you keep lying about yet?

@@ReValveiT_01 lol you're terrified of me

@@DrEMichaelJones Terrified of your utter inability to name a map?! Yeah alright, sure sport. Another day, another bunch of Mikey LIES.

You posted this 7 hours ago, so my prediction that you were going to try and spam that video overnight was correct. You are a predictable little worm. Try harder.

@@ReValveiT_01 keep spiraling little buddy. It won't make Boon Island magically add elevation

As expected, we have lots of crying about "freedom", but no name of the SCALED flat world map that Mikey boy claims. Mikey boy gets that freedom back once he's named the *SCALED* flat world map that has every distance between any two points correct *LIKE MY SCALED DESK GLOBE DOES* .

@@ReValveiT_01 Normally I'm not a fan of deleting comments but I think your actions with regard to little bidet are calibrated and reasonable. His unwillingness to present a flat earth map with a scale and a coordinate system yet demand citations from others and his willful misrepresentation of others' comments justify targeted deletion.

@@marcg1686 He's been allowed to obfuscate for over a month on my other videos. Enough is enough. The terms are simple: once he names the *SCALED* flat world map that *HE KEEPS CLAIMING* , he gets to post again. Liars don't get to spread their garbage claims on this video.

@@ReValveiT_01 What? No more Mikey boy rigorous analysis of the shape of our world?

​@@robertlafleur5179 "dUr sLaNtEd HoRiZoNtaL" is about as rigorous an analysis as Mikey boy can muster.

@@DrEMichaelJones You get that freedom back once you've named the scaled flat world map that has every distance between any two points correct *LIKE MY SCALED DESK GLOBE DOES* . Go ahead.

*Deleted Mikey boy comment due to obfuscating from naming the scaled flat world map that he claims*

*Deleted Mikey boy comment due to obfuscating from naming the scaled flat world map that he claims*

*Deleted Mikey boy comment due to obfuscating from naming the scaled flat world map that he claims*

Keep showing everyone that you can't name a single *SCALED* flat world map that can be used for the basic task of measuring distances *LIKE MY SCALED DESK GLOBE CAN* . You wilfully demonstrate how impotent and weak your social media cult religion is. Well done fella. Well done.

*Deleted Mikey boy comment due to obfuscating from naming the scaled flat world map that he claims*

*Deleted Mikey boy comment due to obfuscating from naming the scaled flat world map that he claims*

*Deleted Mikey boy comment due to obfuscating from naming the scaled flat world map that he claims*

@@DrEMichaelJones Coping with the flat map you have never provided although you claimed to be accurate? 🤡

@@primonomeultimonome Mikey's projection generator is working overtime today.

I wouldn't be so sure. I confidently expect little bidet to smear himself across the comments section soon.

@@marcg1686 _''smear himself''_ I was thinking that he'll _''make a fool of himself''_ but _''smear himself''_ is much more descriptive of Mikey boy.

He FINALLY learnt his lesson to NOT comment here. I guess flerfs DO learn... Eventually.

⁠@@ReValveiT_01He was busy ‘’smearing himself’’ (thanks MarcG for that expression) on your preceding video.

@@ReValveiT_01 he is still commenting on your part 6 video but thats it. He continues to repeat that he provided the numbers and his usual thing about citations but has no answers for the other sources I provided or the lidar plots showing 20 ft MHW. Keep asking him to show the math to have it line up with his claimed elevation and height. He of course can't do it and claims to have already provided the numbers. His only attempt was weeks ago and he tried to claim focal height of light was MSL not MHW. When I provided him multiple sources showing MHW he went quiet and has not attempted to use numbers since. He just repeats his 14 ft claim. Coping and seething.

You have been provided sources and shown measurements using scaling. You can look up the lidar data and measurements confirming the elevation is much higher than what you claimed. You already admitted that we are only seeing about 7 ft of the top of the island only leaving the rest of it obstructed. That lines up perfectly with the globe prediction. Thanks again for coping and seething for us all.

@@Requiem4aDr3Am lol called it!

@@DrEMichaelJones Good you finally called it quits. Glad to see you admit you are wrong. Game. Set. Match.

@@Requiem4aDr3Am Cope. Seethe. Mald.

@@DrEMichaelJones Yes those are the things you seem to do the best. Thanks for calling it quits and admitting that the numbers you claimed were all wrong.

I've added you to "always approve comments", so give it a try.

@@ReValveiT_01 Thanks. ICYMI. ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#15/43.1206/-70.4766 Check my Community tab.

Post the link to the NHLPA NOA from May 16, 2012. :D

@@DrEMichaelJones Name the scaled flat world map that has every distance between any two points correct *LIKE MY SCALED DESK GLOBE DOES* (that you keep claiming exists) and I will post any link you like. Ball's in your court, fella.

@@ReValveiT_01 All accurate to-scale maps are rendered in 2D and linearly scaled. Now delete this just like you're deleting all my comments on your next video because you are terrified of the implications of this fact. Ball's in your court to prove me wrong, little buddy. :D

The US NPS Notice of Availability says the height of the lighthouse above the ground is 123' and the elevation of the island above MSL is 14'. "At 123' high, the property is the tallest light structure along the Maine coast. The island is a barren outcrop of granite 14 feet above sea level."

@@DrEMichaelJones While I respect the NPS, its mandate and the work that it does, if I have to choose between the NPS and the USCG and USGS, I know which one I would choose.

@@marcg1686 feel free to link an elevation for Boon Island from USCG or USGS that differs from the 14' elevation cited by NPS.

@@DrEMichaelJones you were provided those weeks ago with the chart and topographical map. You also now have lidar measurements and plots showing that the island is not 14 ft. But hey Mikey show us how a lantern that is installed 118 ft up the tower and is about 6 ft tall can possibly ever have a focal height above MHW of 137 ft with a 14 ft elevation. I want to see how you are able to squeeze that together. Show us because your first attempt tried to use MSL instead and had you trying to claim the light was 5 ft from the very top of the tower which is smaller than the size of the actual lantern. Show us this mysterious math that somehow changes sizes, shapes, and reality itself. Go on I'll wait.

@@marcg1686 Mikey is so pathetic he is now trying to use his claims between two others to deflect. He claimed you said I lied. He is so desperate.

Thank you, marc. It is indeed impossible to accurately scale an image of objects 10+ miles away

@@DrEMichaelJones Misrepresenting what I said. Again. 10 miles is more than sufficient distance to scale subjects in an image with a useful degree of accuracy. Just look at dozens of photos of Ferris wheels on the web

@@marcg1686 you should use your posting privileges to add a link to New England Lighthouses: A Virtual Guide salient quote: "In June 1811, General Lincoln recommended a lighthouse on Boon Island. The tower, completed by that winter, exhibited a fixed light 32 feet above the water. The first keeper, after witnessing the vulnerability of the low island (14 feet above sea level at its highest point ) to storms, left after only a few weeks."

@@marcg1686 So you need a circle in sideview in order to properly scale at long distance. Got it. Maybe you can see about putting a Ferris wheel on Boon Island.

@@DrEMichaelJones I'm going with what the Light List says. I doubt any skipper or navigator has the book you mentioned onboard or considers it a safety relevant publication.

It's also worth noting that you haven't made an argument about where you imagine MSL would be relative to the camera when the tide came in and went right past that tripod that's sitting in the wet sand on the beach... :D Lacking an argument is you being you.

Glad you agree that you can see the island (14' in max elevation btw which is irrefutable) squeezed into that shot thus refuting roohif's absurd and impossible claim that there's a 23' tall vertical hump of water obstructing your view of the island. :D

Worth noting number 2 : Mike spent the best part of a WEEK claiming that the entire height of the island in TC's far shot is visible, right down to the lapping waves. This video clearly proves he was lying. He has to lie. He has no choice. Why? Because... Flerf.

worth noting: Valvy has spent the last week making 7 separate videos about me.

@@ReValveiT_01 When is video 8 coming out with a single citation showing that I have have incorrectly cited the elevation of the island?

Run out of excuses, lad? Finally resorted to the flatty default : 'YOU CAN'T DO THAT BECAUSE IT'S DEVASTATING TO MY CASE!', eh? Well, I can, and I have, so...

@ReValveiT_01 make video #8 the one where you show all your sources for that height of the land being anything but 14' 🍿

@@DrEMichaelJones Internet numbers are infallible, eh Mikey boy? How about THIS one --------> 3959 ? Are all internet numbers infallible, or is "infallible" reserved for just the ones you like? Hypocrite.

@@DrEMichaelJones The elevation of the island doesn't help you. TC's observation matches the globe prediction, NOT the flat earth prediction. TC's observation FALSIFIES flat earth, period. Cope and seethe, lil fella.

@@ReValveiT_01 what elevation of the island do you imagine doesn't help?

Is that your next excuse? Well, I suppose it's on par with all your others.

@ReValveiT_01 you can make 20 videos about me, ma'am, and I still won't date you.

Coming up on a 16 day cope and seethe beano now. He'll have one hell of a hangover.

I got him to make 7 videos, and each one he makes shows how much he's obsessed with me as he loses his grip on reality. :D

@@DrEMichaelJones That's some hilarious projection there, _little buddy!_

ruclips.net/video/_2eGvni_QoM/видео.html Make that 7 videos as of now. Idiot boy just went and made things worse for himself.

@@DrEMichaelJones "he's obsessed with me" I'm obsessed with showing you up for the lying idiot that you are. There is a difference.

Aligning the LOW tide waterline in TC's shot with the HIGH tide waterline in Namad's shot artificially elevates the lighthouse in TC's shot HIGHER, which is precisely what you need. You are literally complaining about something that's *WORKING IN YOUR FAVOUR* . Utter CRETIN.

@ReValveiT_01 Yeah, you lined up that you claimed were low and high tide as the same water line... thanks for that concession. It's almost like you finally realized you can't scale two images from different distances and focal lenghts and compare them... :D

@@DrEMichaelJones Your tide height excuse it eliminated : ruclips.net/video/_2eGvni_QoM/видео.html Oops. You made it worse for yourself, fool. One day you will learn to keep it shut. Nah, you definitely won't. Just too dumb.

@ReValveiT_01 LMAO. 8 VIDEOS! When do plan to make a single video showing a single source with an elevation of island being annoying but 14'? :D

@@DrEMichaelJones "LMAO. 8 VIDEOS!" www.youtube.com/@ReValveiT_01/videos - 7 videos, idiot boy. One for each of the island's feet measured in TC's shot. ruclips.net/video/gVVlkkIrCYQ/видео.html ruclips.net/video/7TSi54BViYY/видео.html ruclips.net/video/5eNcQCAYUH8/видео.html ruclips.net/video/mLAXswQ93iE/видео.html ruclips.net/video/MguEBWRwwsc/видео.html ruclips.net/video/10mRDgCF6k8/видео.html ruclips.net/video/_2eGvni_QoM/видео.html Counting isn't really a "you" thing, eh Mike?

"Be sure to include sources for your 26' of island elevation" Measured. Twice.

@@ReValveiT_01 "measured twice" by putting a ruler on a computer screen? Lol

@@DrEMichaelJones Yes. Scaling is a perfectly legit way of measuring. In fact, I've seen members of your own cult do it on multiple occasions. Seethe.

@ReValveiT_01 trying to scale an image taken over TEN MILES and then do a comparison with one taken from a few hundred yards??? Lmfao

@@DrEMichaelJones Why can't I? Oh, right, because it's devastating to your case.