Game Theory 101 (#66): Ex Ante and Interim Dominance

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 янв 2025

Комментарии • 12

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP 3 года назад +10

    My brain is pretty much on fire at this point. I have to say that the concepts introduced in the last few videos have really upped the challenge.

    • @Gametheory101
      @Gametheory101  3 года назад +3

      Yeah, it's surprising how much more difficult it gets when even a little uncertainty is introduced.

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 3 года назад

      @@Gametheory101 For sure. I plan to keep watching your videos and studying until I get a good grasp on these things. In the...middle of my time doing that, I might check out some more puzzles. Thanks for posting all of this great stuff!

  • @梦帆马
    @梦帆马 3 года назад

    I'm a little bit confused by the notion of "strategy" here. Could you please clearify what is a strategy here? To the best of my knowledge, a strategy of a player in a Bayesian game is a mapping from its type space to its action space.

  • @davide816
    @davide816 Год назад +1

    i don't understand why type a should care about the choices of type b, type a will play R only if it is convenient for him.
    I write this because we made the assumption that every player knew his type.

  • @dominiclebron6073
    @dominiclebron6073 2 года назад

    theres a big vision illustrated @ 5:39 -> definitions of 'ex ante' & 'interim'
    graspable terms, nonetheless deep ideas with mathematical logic to back the claims made in game theory.
    professor vergas then concludes we should always being looking at these 'actors' - making judgements (using %) what type of game the other player plays (spaniel has been using P.D. & Stag Hunt- even tho there are a couple other games?)
    we can ALWAYS eliminate strickly dominated equilibria.
    eliminate emotion in some of these social decisions, replace w/ mathematically logical better payoffs. stay on top of yo game.

  • @raissanumerianodubourcqdan2155
    @raissanumerianodubourcqdan2155 5 лет назад +1

    Why in this game we could remove left for P2 when P1 is PD right away? I thought that since que cannot say Right>Left for P1 type SH we could not remove it beforehand as we saw on previous videos

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 3 года назад

      Sorry I'm not quite sure what you mean, and that's also probably because I'm a bit confused with things myself. If you could reference a specific timestamp in the video and provide additional information, I'll gladly take a shot at answering your question.
      Also, I hope that you have been doing well in the time since you watched this video!

  • @aaaqqq10
    @aaaqqq10 8 лет назад +1

    may i know what is the difference between AI and Game theory. . and which one is better for Cyber security

    • @jacobbaca6606
      @jacobbaca6606 6 лет назад +2

      ha

    • @ivoriankoua3916
      @ivoriankoua3916 4 года назад +1

      Too late but go with , AI when you'll be doing Multiple Agent Reinforcement Learning you'll have to deal with Game Theory.

  • @colleenleigh9132
    @colleenleigh9132 8 лет назад +2

    sow good