do they even have brains?, they claim to want a government thats about security and protection and not liberty but in the same time don't want government protection or security at all, so basically squirrels and chipmunks up there, we need to change the voting laws, theres too much freedom, I mean it's like "Im hungry, I want to eat nothing" we need to change the laws yesterday
Girl shook her head no to the question “should we have armed guards at banks” You are delusional if you think people won’t harm others or commit crimes with violence… it’s just human nature. So we do the best we can’t to protect from those types…. I always get blown away by the ignorance of some people who think others won’t take advantage of soft targets
The problem with the reasoning of the last young man is that his position always places his interests above those of the native population. He believes that his parents can break laws and live off of the labor of others through welfare because they are just looking for a better life.
Look in the "heavy" bag, you'll find the source causing you to sneeze. Charlie should be more vigilant, I spotted this strange bag behavior immediately. Trust your instincts, folks!
I enjoy Steven Cr- I mean- Charlie Kirk's talks, and am mostly in agreement with him, and I totally understand why Americans are so fond of their guns, but I don't understand this "So guns kill 30k, cars kill 55k, so we should get rid of cars" arguement. Cars have a purpose daily, guns, not so much.
My mother was unalived when I was 5….my ex tried to unalive me when I told him I wanted a divorce. We have a gun…it’s locked and safely put away. Those girls are goofy, putting it nicely.
It's funny. I'm a USMC veteran and I whole heartedly believe in the 2nd amendment. We had an old saying: how do you get your hands on a Marines gun? You pry it out of his cold, dead fingers. In my service, I've seen a lot of action. Ask me how many times I've unalived a child, foreign or domestic? Rhetorical question. The answer is zero. I promise you an attempt to confiscate anybody's firearm, military, or civilian, that action will cause a ripple effect. What guarantees anyone involved safety when you try to take their firearm? What guarantees they won't lash back in retaliation and peace and safety is upheld? Police are called to "assist" in safety. Feel free to fact check me, but unaliving caused by police is a very high number. Not just perps/criminals, but countless free, law abiding citizens as well. Who is authorized to save or keep those victims safe? See where I'm going with this?
Approximate 42,600 in the US were shot in 2023, of which just over 19,000 died 🇺🇲 3,260 shooting victims were aged 17 or under and 1,190 of them died 😵 That's according to three separate websites that all have (roughly) the same statistics based on the numbers they provided 🌐
So, you asign value, to uses? I'm not getting the point. Its about life and death. So what kills what amount. If you stay with cost of life cars are worse. Actually far worse all the way around even with thier alternate use you bring up. It's safe to say cars kill millions.
Purpose isn't what is being argued though. The result is being argued. If one argues that guns should be outlawed because people use guns to kill people, then anything that can be used to kill people should be outlawed as well if you truly care about the preservation of life. The intent of the designer of the tool is irrelevant.
Guns can be used for sport and hunting. They aren't just made for shooting people either, it can also be used against an animal who's a threat. Just having a gun can also deter a criminals without having to pull the trigger. So what you're saying is that something made for transportation is more important than self defense. Which is also ironic since the same people who wouldn't advocate for car bans think that they're causing climate change.
Charlie Kirk does not win debates through substantive arguments. Instead, he relies on debate tactics, superior preparation, and greater experience than his opponents. When you analyze the entirety of his discussions, it becomes clear that it is these tactics, rather than genuine reasoning, that carry him through. This approach amounts to nothing more than well-prepared and strategically unchallenged far-right conservative propaganda.
He DOES win thru substantive content. Witness how they go silent when they realize he boxed them into a corner with LOGIC. Far more amusing to me is ur dis on experience, debate tactics, & superior preparation --- as if these are somehow bad things!
"Charlie Kirk is cheating by being more informed than the people that choose to come up and debate him because they believe he is wrong." If its propaganda then disprove it. Facts and statistics aren't propaganda your arguments are weak and your world view is flawed so you see everything that isn't agreeing with you as evil.
@@mimiruss8444 Do you think this is a good counterargument? A car is designed for transportation, to get people from point A to point B. Yes, accidents happen, and it's tragic, but cars are not made to kill. Firearms, like handguns, are specifically designed to inflict harm or kill. That’s a fundamental difference. Plus, cars are already heavily regulated: you need a license, insurance, and you must follow traffic laws to prevent accidents. Firearms often don’t have the same level of regulation, even though the risk they pose is much greater due to their intended purpose. So, stricter gun laws make sense to reduce violence and unnecessary deaths.
@@TinTin175 we have laws for cars, but we still have people driving cars illegally without a license and under the influence. your responses to ban all cars it’s already regulated and people still break the law. What’s the difference between guns people that are going to break the guns laws don’t care about the law in the first place however however it is my second amendment right to own a gun that’s in the constitution whether you like it or not.
College is where brains go to learn how to stop thinking
These girls have thought this issue through as much as Kamala. So ignorant
Well said!
When you go against my beliefs you're a bad person, woa, dangerous
She looks very much uncomfortable after her questions to Mr. Charlie backfired...
“I think you are a bad person when you want to restrict my rights”
“ I think we should take all the guns”
Funny
Oh the irony. 😏
do they even have brains?, they claim to want a government thats about security and protection and not liberty but in the same time don't want government protection or security at all, so basically squirrels and chipmunks up there, we need to change the voting laws, theres too much freedom, I mean it's like "Im hungry, I want to eat nothing" we need to change the laws yesterday
In the 30s a gun ban was passed in Germany . Hitler said that"there would be no more crime". So much for that idea....
Chadler.
Girl shook her head no to the question “should we have armed guards at banks”
You are delusional if you think people won’t harm others or commit crimes with violence… it’s just human nature. So we do the best we can’t to protect from those types…. I always get blown away by the ignorance of some people who think others won’t take advantage of soft targets
Yea in other countries, they literally have armed guards standing in open with rifles at banks
Life been too easy for too long and people like these girls never learn the true reality of human nature.
When I was in college, there’s hardly if any political discussion at all. All we learned are academics
Facts
The problem with the reasoning of the last young man is that his position always places his interests above those of the native population. He believes that his parents can break laws and live off of the labor of others through welfare because they are just looking for a better life.
It took the Peru kid like 4 min of stuttering to ultimately not say anything.. yep, these are our brightest minds people.
Imagine how much of a genius he has to think he is in order to go up there 💀
And that is an immigration failure.
To be fair I think he has some sort of mental disability. The way he speaks and acts is slightly off
He really thought he had something there 😂
‼️“Indoctrinated” Not “Educated”‼️
What is with these video titles?😂 Love this guy though, these college students are learning more than what they are paying to sit in classes!
I got my degree when people in college knew how to think through a topic and listen to different opinions
Sadly the art of debating and of playing Devil's advocate are lost on the youth of today.
Stop deleting my comment u peppega
Look in the "heavy" bag, you'll find the source causing you to sneeze. Charlie should be more vigilant, I spotted this strange bag behavior immediately. Trust your instincts, folks!
Video title was a little misleading
they really like their clickbait, and Charlie being so respectful doesn't really shoot them down but presents their own illogical ideas to them xd
She's worried about her rights, but wants to take rights away from others.
If you are the dad of these two girls, you failed.
"Yes and no" is no answer at all.
Sadly, not literally.
they want a nanny state
Explain how your rights and beliefs cone before mine? Just because your belief is no guns doesn't mean i have to give up my right to have a gun.
❤
We also protect RICH PEOPLE and POLITICIANS with guns. WHY?!?
I enjoy Steven Cr- I mean- Charlie Kirk's talks, and am mostly in agreement with him, and I totally understand why Americans are so fond of their guns, but I don't understand this "So guns kill 30k, cars kill 55k, so we should get rid of cars" arguement. Cars have a purpose daily, guns, not so much.
My mother was unalived when I was 5….my ex tried to unalive me when I told him I wanted a divorce. We have a gun…it’s locked and safely put away. Those girls are goofy, putting it nicely.
It's funny. I'm a USMC veteran and I whole heartedly believe in the 2nd amendment. We had an old saying: how do you get your hands on a Marines gun? You pry it out of his cold, dead fingers. In my service, I've seen a lot of action. Ask me how many times I've unalived a child, foreign or domestic? Rhetorical question. The answer is zero.
I promise you an attempt to confiscate anybody's firearm, military, or civilian, that action will cause a ripple effect. What guarantees anyone involved safety when you try to take their firearm? What guarantees they won't lash back in retaliation and peace and safety is upheld? Police are called to "assist" in safety. Feel free to fact check me, but unaliving caused by police is a very high number. Not just perps/criminals, but countless free, law abiding citizens as well. Who is authorized to save or keep those victims safe? See where I'm going with this?
Coce & Hero... e must be Legal.
Because people are dieing with Illegal coce & Hor...
Oh come on you guys! Be fair! After all, I was dabbling in delusion and Marxism when I was 18 years old. Then I grew up.
YES, the government should take care of its people first because it is using the people’s money!
Its not Charlie's fault that most debaters are unprepared. I'm sure he would like a better prepared opponent, but sadly there aren't many out there.
Never bring feelings to a factual debate.
Simple logic and common sense is all that it takes to break down the left wing illusion.
Him tossing out hats to all the college kids I know makes lefties on campus so mad lol
College: Where you pay thousands of dollars to get more stupid.
The idiocy of those two is mind boggling.
Feel like little dude was gonna do something until he got up there what’s up with that?
Peru is a great country. That is why we fled it and are seeking asylum here.
I hope those girls never find themselves in a position where they wished they had a Walther!
Charlie Kirk your too awesome ! Rock N Roll
Charlie explains algebra to parakeets
Women and gays vs masculinity
Very bad choice for this video title
Want safety move to China.
There is no mixed bag regardless of any situation I feed my kids before I feed my neighbor's kids that's just common sense a fact of life
What school is this?
Approximate 42,600 in the US were shot in 2023, of which just over 19,000 died 🇺🇲
3,260 shooting victims were aged 17 or under and 1,190 of them died 😵
That's according to three separate websites that all have (roughly) the same statistics based on the numbers they provided 🌐
She said 30,000 children die each year. You must be in college. You do not listen.
I love Charlie Kirk
😂😂😂😂😂
Im a Charlie kirk fan but im against this gun policy.
The car argument is a false dichotomy. Cars have a purpose other than inflicting damage.
So, you asign value, to uses?
I'm not getting the point. Its about life and death. So what kills what amount. If you stay with cost of life cars are worse. Actually far worse all the way around even with thier alternate use you bring up. It's safe to say cars kill millions.
Tyranny stopper is the other use
It is for safety until it is something they don't agree with, then safety doesn't matter. Just imagine if they report car deaths like gun deaths
Purpose isn't what is being argued though. The result is being argued. If one argues that guns should be outlawed because people use guns to kill people, then anything that can be used to kill people should be outlawed as well if you truly care about the preservation of life. The intent of the designer of the tool is irrelevant.
Guns can be used for sport and hunting. They aren't just made for shooting people either, it can also be used against an animal who's a threat. Just having a gun can also deter a criminals without having to pull the trigger. So what you're saying is that something made for transportation is more important than self defense. Which is also ironic since the same people who wouldn't advocate for car bans think that they're causing climate change.
Charlie Kirk does not win debates through substantive arguments. Instead, he relies on debate tactics, superior preparation, and greater experience than his opponents. When you analyze the entirety of his discussions, it becomes clear that it is these tactics, rather than genuine reasoning, that carry him through. This approach amounts to nothing more than well-prepared and strategically unchallenged far-right conservative propaganda.
So debate his point then.. sounds like somebody’s just mad they got beat
He DOES win thru substantive content. Witness how they go silent when they realize he boxed them into a corner with LOGIC.
Far more amusing to me is ur dis on experience, debate tactics, & superior preparation --- as if these are somehow bad things!
"Charlie Kirk is cheating by being more informed than the people that choose to come up and debate him because they believe he is wrong." If its propaganda then disprove it. Facts and statistics aren't propaganda your arguments are weak and your world view is flawed so you see everything that isn't agreeing with you as evil.
@@mimiruss8444 Do you think this is a good counterargument?
A car is designed for transportation, to get people from point A to point B. Yes, accidents happen, and it's tragic, but cars are not made to kill. Firearms, like handguns, are specifically designed to inflict harm or kill. That’s a fundamental difference. Plus, cars are already heavily regulated: you need a license, insurance, and you must follow traffic laws to prevent accidents. Firearms often don’t have the same level of regulation, even though the risk they pose is much greater due to their intended purpose. So, stricter gun laws make sense to reduce violence and unnecessary deaths.
@@TinTin175 we have laws for cars, but we still have people driving cars illegally without a license and under the influence. your responses to ban all cars it’s already regulated and people still break the law. What’s the difference between guns people that are going to break the guns laws don’t care about the law in the first place however however it is my second amendment right to own a gun that’s in the constitution whether you like it or not.