Very interesting experiment. Instead of measuring the amount of weight reduction by trying to take off and fly, spin the fan backwards and press it down onto the scale to see how much force it is able to apply. Then you could grab some statistics like how much power it takes to generate a certain amount of lift. Be curious what that curve looks like.
If the scale and motor had a small scaffold, perhaps made of heavy duty aluminum foil with a hole punched through it, positioned just under the propeller and resting on the floor of the chamber on 4 legs positioned around the corners of the scale, the downward thrust could be deflected and an accurate measurement taken.
Though for more accurate testing nasa used a device to simulate mars gravity by using cables that lifted the ingenuity enough to counteract the extra force earth applies. Bu this is s good experiment he did nonetheless.
@@MrPILI86 Well the temperature drops if the pressure drops, but if the pressure was always low, then that isn't the case. Changes in pressure change the temperature, but low pressure doesn't automatically equal cold.
@@DANGJOS what I’ve written was meant to be kind of a tongue in cheek remotely scientific pun. Judging by the comments , I failed 🤣. Of course once you are changing the volume of the gas , the relationship between pressure and temperature is not as I described it ;)
Really interesting that because there was very low air drag, the blade kept spinning for much longer inside the vacuum chamber as compared to if it were outside
What I'm seeing the most is the ring/tip lifting while the center of the blade is struggling to detach from electric motor also the outer or the tip of the blade is traveling faster than the center and putting the two together this can snap the blade but maybe it was the centrifugal force or both lol
@@S3.14codm I think so too. The forces on the blade varies within the structure of the blade which creates warping and wobbling until the material strength snaps. The engineers at nasa had to problem solve the exact same thing I think. And I wonder if they talk to engineers who design submarine propellers since they work under different pressure too. Much more pressure of course but there had to be similar problem solving
@@Heyitscryz submarines also have to try an compensate and minimise cavitation, as that is a massive problem giving the subs position away to passive sonar. They also tend to be Phosphor Bronze to reduce corrosion weight is not really a factor.
Am I the only one who thinks the use of the vacuum and pressure gauge fittings for electrical continuity through the chamber walls is the most ingenious part of this setup? 😉
cd=4.75in x 3.14 pie = 14.915in circumference x5200rpm =77,558 ipm x 60 min per hour =4,653,480 iph divide by 12 inch per foot = 387,790fph divide by 5280 feet per mile = rim velocity of 73.44 MPH. Its funny some people think with the earth's rim velocity of 1040mph at the equator, all the oceans sand and loose things just stick to the spinning ball. LOL
@@tadpole0690 where is your proof of the BullSh*t story of the pressurized, spinning, water covered cannon ball, whirling, twirling and hurtling simultaneously in four different directions at a combined speed upwards of 2million MPH through the infinite vacuum of space with no physical barrier between, spherical Earth Theory?
@@In_Rem What's the angular velocity of the CD compared to the earth? Flattards don't like to talk about angular velocity IME, it hurts their retarded claims quite badly.
@@ferrumignis Take your angular velocity with you to the center axis of a 3963 mile dia. disk placed inside of a ring with an inside dia. of 3963 miles 1ft for clearance. Ok, start rotating the disk up to an angular velocity of 15 degrees per hour which equals 1039mph @ the "RIM" of the disk, while holding the ring stationary. Now start migrating to the edge, when you get to the edge with your angular velocity in your head step off the angular velocity of 15 degrees per hour disc onto the stationary ring. LOL@UrSass!!!!!!! You will never make to the edge as the centrifugal force at just 300 miles out will throw you off the 3963 mile disk only rotating15 degrees per hour. It is called rim velocity for a reason.
@@hexedhydra2554 And he is also brainwashing you with the propaganda he is ordered to produce, too bad you are a gullible sheep and can not tell the difference between truth and fantasy.
@@idontcare7961 not sure whether I should ask if you’re okay or report for spam. What the shit are you talking about? You told me nothing about what I was supposedly blindly believing.
@@FrankyPi Not really. Only exposed fluids on your skin or tongue would vaporize, and you wouldn't bloat nearly as much as the marshmallows. What kills you in a vacuum is suffocation.
@The Action Lab I am doing a distillation experiment and I am trying to find two liquids that are non-toxic/poisonous, not explosive, and overall safe to boil. Any recommendations?
Azidoazide azide but in liquid form... don't know how to make it liquid but I'm sure you'll figure it out... nahh forget making it liquid just shove it in a pan and try boiling it
0:24 I will definitely consider not giving martians a bag of chips in one of my videos. Lol Edit: I wish I had gotten these likes on my videos instead of here .😂
@@lukmly013 That's true tho but we can also say it as Pressurised since the fact is Vaccum always exerts an inward force to tear apart the walls of the chamber it builds up in and hence the inward pressure can be termed as Pressurised container too .!
When I was a kid in 1972, we had toy flying props like that. Some launchers had a 'C' cell and motor with a gun-like trigger. Others had a string to pull or a coil spring to wind up.
It is a representation on ELohim.. Death Note, Light represents the Grim Reaper who is Jesus. It means Jesus is the Grim Reaper. These Are Shinigami Eyes in Jewish Gematria equals: 997 Invisible Coding in Jewish Gematria equals: 997 So much the humans will never understand. The world was lied to about EVERYTHING.
BTW, I today I got stuck in the RUclips shorts vacuum for about 3 hours, but along the way your videos made it slightly more bearable. Keep up the good content.
to mimic the approach used to make this work for ingenuity, you would need a propellor with signifcantly higher blade pitch. This means that the prop would be directing a larger volume of air downwards at the same RPM as a one of lower pitch. You can see in the photo of ingenuity that the blades have a massively steep pitch close to the hub, which tapers out towards the leading edge. This design ensures that an even amount of thrust is produced all the way along the blade, where a consistent pitch would see the bulk of the lift being generated near the tips, placing enormous stresses on the hub due to leverage. It also helps the prop cope with high rotational speeds, as the centre of mass of each blade sits closer to the hub, but you are still getting the advantage of a larger total surface area compared to a smaller diameter consistent-pitch prop with similar CoG characteristics. I would highly recommend trying this experiment again, but with a 5" FPV quadcopter triblade such as the Gemfan Hurricane 51499 or the T-Motor 5150 props. These are rated for extreme RPMs (40,000+ is typical for high performance racing drones) and they have an aggressive pitch that tapers along the blade. You may need to 3d a similar "floating mount" like you have here to take advantage of the 5mm shaft of a brushless racing drone motor, such as a 2207, high Kv brushless motor to achieve the desired RPMs. NASA really have those big blades spinning very fast for their size to make it fly, I think you would get impressive results with a similar approach
To find more exactly the lowest pressure your thingy can fly in; mount the rig upside-down on the lid and run the motor in reverse, then slowly suck the air out of the chamber. The thingy will drop when it can't push against the motor anymore.
I'm not sure I would call that flying as much as getting flung off of the pins that are pushing it. That would mean it's getting a little lift, but it looks like the blades would have to spin a lot faster than the blades on Ingenuity seem to be in order to actually lift off, even just a little bit. If you did a frame by frame side by side with a modern ball shaped drone, it would probably compare very much to the apparent movement of Ingenuity, which it looks by your experiment, can't be done.
I thought this was a flawed experiment that centrifugal force flung it off to the side it doesn't lift off and fly upwards you have made a keen observation
Put the scale under a transparent cover which is larger than the scale and rests on the floor of the vacuum chamber, with a small hole on top for the propeller shaft to go to the prop. In this way, the motor will be on the scale under the cover, which will permit observation of the weight on the scale. The lift generated by the propeller will not be offset by the downdraft, and thus an estimate of the lift force can be measured.
@@babayada2015 there are these things you sit on called toilets. Instead of squating in the street, it's best to sit on these magical toilet devices. Then your country won't create new variants of Covid.
If you suspended a baffle above the motor and below the propeller you could get a better reading of total lift. Much like running your motor through your scale as far as results go .
@@1.4142 I don't think rockets can work in the vacuum of space either ,, and as there is no way to stabalize flight in space with wings or airlorans im pretty sure all nasa claimsare bunk
5:30. That actually really only looks like Gyroscopic, Centripetal and Centrifugal forces at play. Due to the vacuum. Congratulations you've just discovered anti-gravity.! And all by yourself.! Try doing the same thing but removing the angle on the blades or replace the blades all together with little aerodynamic Support Beams. So that you can rule out aerodynamic lift all together.
Increase the atmosphere of the chamber to offset the gravitational difference of Mars to Earth. Not sure if it would be linear, but you could have ~ three times more atmosphere present in your experiment to account for the gravity difference?
Great experiment. It also proves something interesting, the reaction principle of propellers. I.E. That propellers do not act like screws that drive through air like in a solid but by accelerating gas particles backwards and this is why it works even at such low pressures.
@@ferrumignis No, they just create a pressure difference between the upper side and the lower one and this is why life is lost very quickly with altitude because the less initial pressure to work with, the less of a difference you can create.
@@ferrumignis However it is also because if this that flying with wings is much much more economical that flying on a vertical jet like a Harrier or F35 or the Lunar Module for that purpose. Flying with wings is just about geometry, like water skiing is not actually floating but just a dynamic phenomenon.
@@thelovertunisia _"No, they just create a pressure difference between the upper side and the lower one "_ Correct. A propeller is simply a moving wing, and operates on the same principal.
@Cheezl420 Says fuq it Yep there is it...Flatard comment. I gave you a chance to not be one, but you sure did. If you think the earth is flat, there are no words I can say to change your mind. So there is no point to further this comment.
4:24 Just as the rotor was leaving, it swung slightly and therefore grabbed the white power cord and broke. If you are a real scientist, you need to take things into account and prepare for the experiment much better. But if you're just a clown, then all is well.
I really think focus us in create ways for generate specifics artificial atmospheres in order to change eventually the conditions and parameters in one planet is the first step for prepare a place for go there in future... great interesting video and experiment ... loving the content here ...
Another great video! I never realized how difficult it was to get a flight vehicle on Mars! This makes complete sense and very entertaining!!! Thank you so much!
Can this motor spin fast enough? With the lower atmospheric pressure and lower air resistance, the same amount of energy can spin it much faster. But that would require a different gearing.
in the near vacuum, the downward pressure from the spinning blades would likely be minimal in ratio to the amount of vacuum (lack of air to enable lift) in the chamber.
That thing does not fly in such low pressure. Imo the second propeler just jumped out and started hitting to the box walls due to the inertia energy. Something does not fit with that helicopter flying on mars, and you can guess what it is. Very nice video and experiment
At what point does the huge reduction in convection air cooling for the electric motor cause it to overheat in the vacuum chamber? Maybe you could run the motor in there under load with a temperature sensor, with and without a vacuum to see what change there is in the rate of temperature rise.
@@daviddavids2884 Most electric motors rely on air movement to remove heat that is generated internally due to inefficiencies. They have fans inside them to help with this. Quite often motors need to be de-rated when used at higher altitudes (for example in some places in Colorado that are much higher than sea-level), because the less dense air cannot contribute as much to the cooling of the motor. In a Mars atmosphere there will be much less atmosphere to help cool the motor. The motor's internal temperature will likely rise much faster. It would be interesting to see that measured in this simulation. That's wtf I'm talking about.
Please try this!!!!! Would keeping a apple in a vacuum camber keep it from going bad? Or, other things like pairs and veggies and maybe be able to make a freezer vacuum chamber and let it sit for years. What would happen to the fruit and veggies after me would they still be good to eat?
Any chance of tossing some dust/sand on a panel and seeing if the helicopter can sweep it off in a Mars equivalent atmosphere? I've seen helicopters take off/ land and the amount of clearing force is considerable. Maybe NASA has already experimented with this, but it may be a viable option to clear solar panels on their equipment and I'd like to see if it'd work.
After being introduced to your earlier episodes not long ago and having watches some of them, I can definetly say that you are becoming quite the science youtuber. 🖖
I feel like in those pressures, the blade angle of approach also needs to be changed. those plastic once and great 1 bar atmospheric pressure but I think will be different at lower pressures.
Bro... I watch and follow literally many dozens if not hundreds of science channels and I also, somewhat embarrassingly admit that I also watch and follow quite a few “fake space” and “flat earth” channels. I do this to keep my mind balanced and exposed to the opposing arguments. Sort of the devils advocate practice. Well, sometimes these channels offer some interesting thought experiments that truly throw some wrenches in the scientific minded person. This channel is the only s channel I’ve ever scene that does actual experimentations to disprove the arguments of “fake space” people and “flat earth” people. Other channels argue with logic and theory and that’s not enough. Only through experimentation and observation can false scientific ideas be defeated. You’re my intellectual saving grace.
I have an idea . Plz break the glass of the vacume champer while in full vacume . Or throw it down from a high place . I wana see what happens . And becareful with it . Thank you
is it having a harder time because that thing isn't made to spin at that high of RPM? It is clearly stretching, which could be deforming the blades.with everything else working against it to get off the motor, any deformation of the wings from stretching would have an impact on their ability to generate lift.
Maybe put a shield "table" over the scale with a small hole for a ~2 cm block to go through, on which you can rest the apparatus, to shield the scales from downward air?
The blade-only work around is pretty brilliant, I have to say. I was asking myself this question as soon as I saw the thumbnail/title. Ingenuity, indeed. LoL
We know that spinning the plastic fan will stretch it(as shown by it exploding), I feel that the center of it will also stretch/expand, but likely unevenly because of the attachment points of the blade. This could easily grip down on the electric motor adapter causing it to need more energy to actually "release" the fan blade.
For added realism to how JPL actually tested it try adding a gravity offset weight that gives the helicopter a net weight (where weight is F=m*a) equivalent to that it would have on Mars via a pulley system or springs.
Could a bump upward like that be used to assist in flight? We're trying to create lift like we would in Earth so maybe the assistance of an upward bump is necessary in some instances. Not studied in this area, but just a thought when seeing yoru experiement.
a Much larger chamber like 20 times the size would be better and then watching you fly around and have the control to take off and land on different little landing pads to show that not only can you get lift in a vacuum like that but you can also control the vehicles direction and land without crashing etc!
Could the pressure change, cause the plastic to swell around the spindle of the motor? Looked like it was trying to take off with the motor a few times.
Very interesting experiment. Instead of measuring the amount of weight reduction by trying to take off and fly, spin the fan backwards and press it down onto the scale to see how much force it is able to apply. Then you could grab some statistics like how much power it takes to generate a certain amount of lift. Be curious what that curve looks like.
If the scale and motor had a small scaffold, perhaps made of heavy duty aluminum foil with a hole punched through it, positioned just under the propeller and resting on the floor of the chamber on 4 legs positioned around the corners of the scale, the downward thrust could be deflected and an accurate measurement taken.
you could also put the wheigt on a hanging scale...?
Though for more accurate testing nasa used a device to simulate mars gravity by using cables that lifted the ingenuity enough to counteract the extra force earth applies.
Bu this is s good experiment he did nonetheless.
Dontcha just love outside the box physics..simple smart application...cudos
I had no idea atmospheric pressure in mars was THAT low, ingenuity is much much cooler now
Well, once the pressure drops , the T also
is dropping, sooo vacuum is cool by default 🤣🤓
@@MrPILI86 what about radiated heat?
@@MrPILI86 Well the temperature drops if the pressure drops, but if the pressure was always low, then that isn't the case. Changes in pressure change the temperature, but low pressure doesn't automatically equal cold.
That's why u should be interested in space
@@DANGJOS what I’ve written was meant to be kind of a tongue in cheek remotely scientific pun. Judging by the comments , I failed 🤣. Of course once you are changing the volume of the gas , the relationship between pressure and temperature is not as I described it ;)
Neat experiment here... really shows the power of Ingenuity!
Side Note: Using the meter and the vacuum port as terminals was genius!
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
I just noticed the way he did it! So smart!
@@frankh.3849 why tf are u laughing?
Smart smart .....he don't have a clue
Spark plugs work too
Really interesting that because there was very low air drag, the blade kept spinning for much longer inside the vacuum chamber as compared to if it were outside
Maybe the blade has a circle surrounding the blade and idk what type of blade that is
@LabRat Knatz The sun already does that!
@LabRat Knatz The moon would be better. Closer to earth for maintenance etc, and alot more sunlight than on mars.
Thats also why it didn’t launch
Anyone see the fan ring grow in size during the spool-up? Too cool!
What I'm seeing the most is the ring/tip lifting while the center of the blade is struggling to detach from electric motor also the outer or the tip of the blade is traveling faster than the center and putting the two together this can snap the blade but maybe it was the centrifugal force or both lol
@@S3.14codm I think so too. The forces on the blade varies within the structure of the blade which creates warping and wobbling until the material strength snaps.
The engineers at nasa had to problem solve the exact same thing I think. And I wonder if they talk to engineers who design submarine propellers since they work under different pressure too. Much more pressure of course but there had to be similar problem solving
@@Heyitscryz submarines also have to try an compensate and minimise cavitation, as that is a massive problem giving the subs position away to passive sonar. They also tend to be Phosphor Bronze to reduce corrosion weight is not really a factor.
Am I the only one who thinks the use of the vacuum and pressure gauge fittings for electrical continuity through the chamber walls is the most ingenious part of this setup? 😉
exactly same thought 👍👍
When i saw that i was like "thats big brain play right there."
4:23 This is why CD-ROM drives stopped around 52x speed.
cd=4.75in x 3.14 pie = 14.915in circumference x5200rpm =77,558 ipm x 60 min per hour =4,653,480 iph divide by 12 inch per foot = 387,790fph divide by 5280 feet per mile = rim velocity of 73.44 MPH. Its funny some people think with the earth's rim velocity of 1040mph at the equator, all the oceans sand and loose things just stick to the spinning ball. LOL
@@tadpole0690 where is your proof of the BullSh*t story of the pressurized, spinning, water covered cannon ball, whirling, twirling and hurtling simultaneously in four different directions at a combined speed upwards of 2million MPH through the infinite vacuum of space with no physical barrier between, spherical Earth Theory?
@@tadpole0690 must have been an intense odor
@@In_Rem What's the angular velocity of the CD compared to the earth? Flattards don't like to talk about angular velocity IME, it hurts their retarded claims quite badly.
@@ferrumignis Take your angular velocity with you to the center axis of a 3963 mile dia. disk placed inside of a ring with an inside dia. of 3963 miles 1ft for clearance. Ok, start rotating the disk up to an angular velocity of 15 degrees per hour which equals 1039mph @ the "RIM" of the disk, while holding the ring stationary. Now start migrating to the edge, when you get to the edge with your angular velocity in your head step off the angular velocity of 15 degrees per hour disc onto the stationary ring. LOL@UrSass!!!!!!! You will never make to the edge as the centrifugal force at just 300 miles out will throw you off the 3963 mile disk only rotating15 degrees per hour. It is called rim velocity for a reason.
I love this guy, he sounds so excited like its the first time he's ever seen his experiment.
He does the coolest experiments too, not lame stuff like you might see in your high school science class
Yah he's a great teacher 👍
@@hexedhydra2554 And he is also brainwashing you with the propaganda he is ordered to produce, too bad you are a gullible sheep and can not tell the difference between truth and fantasy.
@@idontcare7961 not sure whether I should ask if you’re okay or report for spam. What the shit are you talking about? You told me nothing about what I was supposedly blindly believing.
@@hexedhydra2554 Yes you just confirmed you are brainwashed.
Love all your content sir
If you love it so much why don't you marry it?
@@lordhumongous4272 it?? He's a person.
@@lordhumongous4272 are you like 5?
@@Pokeman_official1 yea his last comment was can you Pee in a vaccum ??
@@elishavijoy3522 well that is a "serious" question...
4:23 - Part of why Ingenuity can fly on Mars is because they did find a way to dramatically increase the propeller speed.
GeAr RAtiOs
Anyone else smell more NASA bullshit?
@@dannykyle7950 nope
@@dannykyle7950 nope
@@dannykyle7950 nope.
*Marshmallows slowly inflate*
“The reason violent things like this happen...”
If you were exposed to vacuum a similar thing would happen with your body, along with fluids boiling off.
Exactly XD
Yeah, that wouldn't feel nice inside your body
The point is marshmallows slowly inflating isn’t violent.
@@FrankyPi Not really. Only exposed fluids on your skin or tongue would vaporize, and you wouldn't bloat nearly as much as the marshmallows. What kills you in a vacuum is suffocation.
I always look forward to your videos! Such an amazing teacher!!
@The Action Lab I am doing a distillation experiment and I am trying to find two liquids that are non-toxic/poisonous, not explosive, and overall safe to boil. Any recommendations?
Water
Azidoazide azide but in liquid form... don't know how to make it liquid but I'm sure you'll figure it out... nahh forget making it liquid just shove it in a pan and try boiling it
Water and alcohol
coke would be good one, nothing like 40g of black goo to make a point
maybe water and glycerin
0:24 I will definitely consider not giving martians a bag of chips in one of my videos. Lol
Edit: I wish I had gotten these likes on my videos instead of here .😂
Vacuum pack them
@@jwadaow or maybe seal them in a metal container🧐
@@mhw-mr.helloworld4400 they will pop when you unseal the container.
@@jwadaow our fellow martians would have to eat broken chips😂. What a curse. Lol
@@mhw-mr.helloworld4400 On the way to Mars, Once you pop. You can't stop
You do really great experiments
Love is in the Air...
Action Lab : *Hold My Super Pressurised Vaccum Chamber*
Depressurized
@@lukmly013 That's true tho but we can also say it as Pressurised since the fact is Vaccum always exerts an inward force to tear apart the walls of the chamber it builds up in and hence the inward pressure can be termed as Pressurised container too .!
Please make a jet pack
"Gravity Industry's" already make them the royal marines are testing jet packs for boarding ships.
Jet Packs ruclips.net/video/suHOLFhbwsM/видео.html
I always admire your curiosity
Given the opportunity.
He is an example of perseverance.
Way to show your spirit.
Thanks for the Google easter egg about ingenuity!
3:04 i had to pause to appreciate the way you'd routed the current through the pressure gauge and hose mount. pretty clever.
Pretty smart how you’re transferring the voltage for the motor through the existing taps for the vacuum set up.
When I was a kid in 1972, we had toy flying props like that. Some launchers had a 'C' cell and motor with a gun-like trigger. Others had a string to pull or a coil spring to wind up.
Those actually came back around several times in the 80s and 90s, too.
The second fan was scared to break apart like the first one, so jumped to disconnect the power supply; that is what happened.
It is a representation on ELohim.. Death Note, Light represents the Grim Reaper who is Jesus. It means Jesus is the Grim Reaper.
These Are Shinigami Eyes in Jewish Gematria equals: 997
Invisible Coding in Jewish Gematria equals: 997
So much the humans will never understand. The world was lied to about EVERYTHING.
Flat earthers are going to hate this one.
As you said at the begging of the vid, you have to consider the gravity
BTW, I today I got stuck in the RUclips shorts vacuum for about 3 hours, but along the way your videos made it slightly more bearable. Keep up the good content.
Now instead of explainimg others why Ingenuity is so amazing I will just send this link
Yeah on the surface it looks like ingenuity is just a normal drone you would get for Christmas but it’s way more than that
@@Flashisgreatfr shush
Looks like Greenland with a filter... don’t believe everything you see
Mars has an atmosphere ITS NOT A VACUUM
The pressure on the surface of Mars is much lower than earth, but the gravity is also lower.
the pressure at mars is Nearly VACUUM. gravity is NOT a factor.
I wonder if nasa has a room-sized vacuum chamber to test these things.
Surely
Actually after I typed this I searched and found it. They do have one.
@@Yusso I Was going to tell you but as you hav already watched the test videos they did.
Another thing to consider: Mars has less gravity. You can fly better
Awesome vidz man! These expirements are fun! I'm covering my car with solar panels and will be experimenting with it, I'm really excited for it!
What are you expecting to prove that you can’t calculate in advance?
I hope you get good results in your experiment with your car. 😀👍
Thanks guys! @Fred, to create an unlimited source of power! Naturally and nearly anywhere!
@@YoungMoneyFuture how is it unlimited? The amount of solar radiation converted to power is limited by the area of the panel.
@@YoungMoneyFuture panel isn’t big enough to do any good charging.
2:13, snap circuits motor!
I feel my brain expanding every time I watch these
Yea
to mimic the approach used to make this work for ingenuity, you would need a propellor with signifcantly higher blade pitch. This means that the prop would be directing a larger volume of air downwards at the same RPM as a one of lower pitch. You can see in the photo of ingenuity that the blades have a massively steep pitch close to the hub, which tapers out towards the leading edge. This design ensures that an even amount of thrust is produced all the way along the blade, where a consistent pitch would see the bulk of the lift being generated near the tips, placing enormous stresses on the hub due to leverage. It also helps the prop cope with high rotational speeds, as the centre of mass of each blade sits closer to the hub, but you are still getting the advantage of a larger total surface area compared to a smaller diameter consistent-pitch prop with similar CoG characteristics. I would highly recommend trying this experiment again, but with a 5" FPV quadcopter triblade such as the Gemfan Hurricane 51499 or the T-Motor 5150 props. These are rated for extreme RPMs (40,000+ is typical for high performance racing drones) and they have an aggressive pitch that tapers along the blade. You may need to 3d a similar "floating mount" like you have here to take advantage of the 5mm shaft of a brushless racing drone motor, such as a 2207, high Kv brushless motor to achieve the desired RPMs. NASA really have those big blades spinning very fast for their size to make it fly, I think you would get impressive results with a similar approach
Awesome experiments😍
To find more exactly the lowest pressure your thingy can fly in; mount the rig upside-down on the lid and run the motor in reverse, then slowly suck the air out of the chamber. The thingy will drop when it can't push against the motor anymore.
The prophecy is true, he is getting closer to reversing the Earth's rotation and detonating the surface of Mars with a swarm of cupcake launchers
I'm not sure I would call that flying as much as getting flung off of the pins that are pushing it. That would mean it's getting a little lift, but it looks like the blades would have to spin a lot faster than the blades on Ingenuity seem to be in order to actually lift off, even just a little bit. If you did a frame by frame side by side with a modern ball shaped drone, it would probably compare very much to the apparent movement of Ingenuity, which it looks by your experiment, can't be done.
I thought this was a flawed experiment that centrifugal force flung it off to the side it doesn't lift off and fly upwards you have made a keen observation
Atmosphere on Mars: Not enough to be useful. Just enough to be annoying.
Put the scale under a transparent cover which is larger than the scale and rests on the floor of the vacuum chamber, with a small hole on top for the propeller shaft to go to the prop. In this way, the motor will be on the scale under the cover, which will permit observation of the weight on the scale. The lift generated by the propeller will not be offset by the downdraft, and thus an estimate of the lift force can be measured.
*Love how excited you are in every video*
Love from india
i checked out ur channel from this comment
love your work :)
Poo in the loo
@@babayada2015 there are these things you sit on called toilets. Instead of squating in the street, it's best to sit on these magical toilet devices. Then your country won't create new variants of Covid.
@@babayada2015 so, ultimately what I'm saying, is you need to poo in the loo pa,je,et
@@babayada2015 yea, the best at soiling your roads and being the worlds #1 Pooper Power
Doesn't rotating the blades reduce the weight on the scale regardless of whether they can generate lift?
If you suspended a baffle above the motor and below the propeller you could get a better reading of total lift. Much like running your motor through your scale as far as results go .
I waited this video.. finally.
Pretty pertinent that test. Congratulations dude.
That's awesome.
5:27 Green flying propeller: "Hey you only live once. I want freedom, either come with me or stay, either way I am leaving!"
Amazing experiment. Good job 👏🏻
The earth's atmosphere has that pressure at 31,000 m.
Helicopters can't fly over everest or to the camping the death zone and everest is only 29000ft
@@mickjenner6697 Of course normal helicopters can't fly on Mars or at 31,000 m.
@@1.4142 I don't think rockets can work in the vacuum of space either ,, and as there is no way to stabalize flight in space with wings or airlorans im pretty sure all nasa claimsare bunk
@@mickjenner6697 Rockets don't need air to function or stabilize. They can change the direction of thrusters and use Spin-stabilisation.
Very well explained
5:30. That actually really only looks like Gyroscopic, Centripetal and Centrifugal forces at play. Due to the vacuum.
Congratulations you've just discovered anti-gravity.! And all by yourself.!
Try doing the same thing but removing the angle on the blades or replace the blades all together with little aerodynamic Support Beams.
So that you can rule out aerodynamic lift all together.
Increase the atmosphere of the chamber to offset the gravitational difference of Mars to Earth.
Not sure if it would be linear, but you could have ~ three times more atmosphere present in your experiment to account for the gravity difference?
Great experiment. It also proves something interesting, the reaction principle of propellers. I.E. That propellers do not act like screws that drive through air like in a solid but by accelerating gas particles backwards and this is why it works even at such low pressures.
@LabRat Knatz Ion wind is almost the same as ion thrusters that are used in spacecraft regularly now.
Do you think wings work by accelerating gas particles downwards?
@@ferrumignis No, they just create a pressure difference between the upper side and the lower one and this is why life is lost very quickly with altitude because the less initial pressure to work with, the less of a difference you can create.
@@ferrumignis However it is also because if this that flying with wings is much much more economical that flying on a vertical jet like a Harrier or F35 or the Lunar Module for that purpose. Flying with wings is just about geometry, like water skiing is not actually floating but just a dynamic phenomenon.
@@thelovertunisia _"No, they just create a pressure difference between the upper side and the lower one "_ Correct. A propeller is simply a moving wing, and operates on the same principal.
Great videos!
What would happen with different batteries voltage and amperage in a vaccum chamber ?
answer: the SAME THING. NO flying.!!!!!!!!!
There was no offset for difference in gravity. New experiment with a machine that launches those rotors on mars.
Even better, It was able to fly in higher than Mars gravity with the same low atmosphere.
@Cheezl420 Says fuq it Then what do you call the force that makes a moon orbit a planet or planets around a star or even holds you down to the ground?
@Cheezl420 Says fuq it Yep there is it...Flatard comment. I gave you a chance to not be one, but you sure did.
If you think the earth is flat, there are no words I can say to change your mind. So there is no point to further this comment.
If I was there I would have broken all three. The sense of responsibility of this guy!
4:24 Just as the rotor was leaving, it swung slightly and therefore grabbed the white power cord and broke. If you are a real scientist, you need to take things into account and prepare for the experiment much better. But if you're just a clown, then all is well.
He's just a tubettor - nothing more.
I really think focus us in create ways for generate specifics artificial atmospheres in order to change eventually the conditions and parameters in one planet is the first step for prepare a place for go there in future... great interesting video and experiment ... loving the content here ...
I clicked faster than *Ý Ə §*
Another great video! I never realized how difficult it was to get a flight vehicle on Mars! This makes complete sense and very entertaining!!! Thank you so much!
The ONLY thing we need to find out:
can a FLY fly in martian atmosphere?
It has been done, and the answer is not.
But different species of flies should be tested, there must be some with high twr.
Great experiment, thank you for explaining and presentations. 👍
First
CONGRATS
Congrats bri
Can this motor spin fast enough? With the lower atmospheric pressure and lower air resistance, the same amount of energy can spin it much faster. But that would require a different gearing.
in the near vacuum, the downward pressure from the spinning blades would likely be minimal in ratio to the amount of vacuum (lack of air to enable lift) in the chamber.
What about the idea of supporting the motor and blades etc on a “see-saw” that mimics the gravity of Mars by having a counterweight.
I love how you used the pump and pressure gauge as part of your wiring.
What would happen if you put a Li-ion battery in the vacuum?
The way you connect the power supply is brilliant 👍🏻
That thing does not fly in such low pressure. Imo the second propeler just jumped out and started hitting to the box walls due to the inertia energy. Something does not fit with that helicopter flying on mars, and you can guess what it is.
Very nice video and experiment
He is lying puppet spreading propaganda bs.
At what point does the huge reduction in convection air cooling for the electric motor cause it to overheat in the vacuum chamber? Maybe you could run the motor in there under load with a temperature sensor, with and without a vacuum to see what change there is in the rate of temperature rise.
W T F are you Talking about.??????
@@daviddavids2884 Most electric motors rely on air movement to remove heat that is generated internally due to inefficiencies. They have fans inside them to help with this. Quite often motors need to be de-rated when used at higher altitudes (for example in some places in Colorado that are much higher than sea-level), because the less dense air cannot contribute as much to the cooling of the motor. In a Mars atmosphere there will be much less atmosphere to help cool the motor. The motor's internal temperature will likely rise much faster. It would be interesting to see that measured in this simulation.
That's wtf I'm talking about.
Since ending up with three different results I suggest you try this experiment again, but put sand or feathers on the bottom of the chamber.
Please try this!!!!!
Would keeping a apple in a vacuum camber keep it from going bad? Or, other things like pairs and veggies and maybe be able to make a freezer vacuum chamber and let it sit for years. What would happen to the fruit and veggies after me would they still be good to eat?
If you have a vacuum sealer you can do this, but it will make it last a lot longer but it will eventually decay.
Very well informed and easy to follow. Great job sir :)
Any chance of tossing some dust/sand on a panel and seeing if the helicopter can sweep it off in a Mars equivalent atmosphere? I've seen helicopters take off/ land and the amount of clearing force is considerable. Maybe NASA has already experimented with this, but it may be a viable option to clear solar panels on their equipment and I'd like to see if it'd work.
Now do the same experiment, but in an increased pressure
For what reason?
I learnt a lot from these home made experiments. Thank you very much
sir, this is so interesting , can you tell me the material and the thickness of the plate you used ?
I think you have done a very good experiment that drone cannot fly in extremely low atmospheric pressure
After being introduced to your earlier episodes not long ago and having watches some of them, I can definetly say that you are becoming quite the science youtuber.
🖖
I feel like in those pressures, the blade angle of approach also needs to be changed. those plastic once and great 1 bar atmospheric pressure but I think will be different at lower pressures.
Bro... I watch and follow literally many dozens if not hundreds of science channels and I also, somewhat embarrassingly admit that I also watch and follow quite a few “fake space” and “flat earth” channels. I do this to keep my mind balanced and exposed to the opposing arguments. Sort of the devils advocate practice. Well, sometimes these channels offer some interesting thought experiments that truly throw some wrenches in the scientific minded person. This channel is the only s channel I’ve ever scene that does actual experimentations to disprove the arguments of “fake space” people and “flat earth” people. Other channels argue with logic and theory and that’s not enough. Only through experimentation and observation can false scientific ideas be defeated. You’re my intellectual saving grace.
Perhaps a propeller with broader blades and a little more pitch would also help.
I have an idea . Plz break the glass of the vacume champer while in full vacume . Or throw it down from a high place . I wana see what happens . And becareful with it . Thank you
is it having a harder time because that thing isn't made to spin at that high of RPM? It is clearly stretching, which could be deforming the blades.with everything else working against it to get off the motor, any deformation of the wings from stretching would have an impact on their ability to generate lift.
Maybe put a shield "table" over the scale with a small hole for a ~2 cm block to go through, on which you can rest the apparatus, to shield the scales from downward air?
*Percentage of air by volume in chip bag increases*
"The reason violent things like this happens..."
You could 3D print a windshield for the scale, which stands on the ground. So the downwind won't hit the scale.
You can see the circle holding the blades together flex out like crazy
liked your electrical feed-throughs :D great idea
Sir i think you are the son of science I can't explain how good your explanation is
The blade-only work around is pretty brilliant, I have to say. I was asking myself this question as soon as I saw the thumbnail/title. Ingenuity, indeed. LoL
Great video!! You can also see the gyroscopic effect of the spinning blade, as it tries to remain it one orientation.
We know that spinning the plastic fan will stretch it(as shown by it exploding), I feel that the center of it will also stretch/expand, but likely unevenly because of the attachment points of the blade. This could easily grip down on the electric motor adapter causing it to need more energy to actually "release" the fan blade.
The effects of Mars’ atmosphere are covered in depth in a documentary called Total Recall
For added realism to how JPL actually tested it try adding a gravity offset weight that gives the helicopter a net weight (where weight is F=m*a) equivalent to that it would have on Mars via a pulley system or springs.
He did, blade alone!
Could a bump upward like that be used to assist in flight? We're trying to create lift like we would in Earth so maybe the assistance of an upward bump is necessary in some instances. Not studied in this area, but just a thought when seeing yoru experiement.
Well.. I didn't see that coming. Awesome demonstration.
a Much larger chamber like 20 times the size would be better and then watching you fly around and have the control to take off and land on different little landing pads to show that not only can you get lift in a vacuum like that but you can also control the vehicles direction and land without crashing etc!
Could the pressure change, cause the plastic to swell around the spindle of the motor? Looked like it was trying to take off with the motor a few times.
Hi, can you please show us what gas behaviour in vacuum? Let try 2 types, heavy and light weight gasses.
I love your method for getting electricity inside the chamber!