Dark Curvature, Navigating the Oort Cloud, Future of Space Toilets | Q&A 207
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 июл 2024
- Should we change "Dark Matter" to "Dark Curvature"? How do you navigate through dense asteroid fields? What's the future of space toilets? Do aliens block their outgoing signals? All these and more in this week's Q&A with Fraser Cain.
🦄 Support us on Patreon:
/ universetoday
Book Club:
/ universe-today-book-club
00:00 Start
00:58 [Tatooine] How do you navigate through dense asteroid fields?
04:02 [Coruscant] Should we change "Dark Matter" to "Dark Curvature"?
07:57 [Hoth] How far can we communicate?
10:49 [Naboo] How can we solve the Fermi paradox?
17:35 [Kamino] What's the future of space toilets?
19:51 [Bespin] Can we avoid the great filter?
22:53 [Mustafar] Why the CMB doesn't go away?
25:35 [Alderaan] Do aliens block their outgoing signals?
27:33 [Dagobah] Can we create a magnetic shield for our spaceships?
30:39 [Yavin] Can aliens detect Earth as a habitable world?
31:44 [Mandalore] Does gravity extend forever?
📰 EMAIL NEWSLETTER
Read by 60,000 people every Friday. Written by Fraser. No ads.
Subscribe Free: universetoday.com/newsletter
🎧 PODCASTS
Universe Today: universetoday.fireside.fm/
Weekly Space Hangout: / @weeklyspacehangout
Astronomy Cast: www.astronomycast.com/
🤳 OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA
Twitter: / fcain
Twitter: / universetoday
Facebook: / universetoday
Instagram: / universetoday
📩 CONTACT FRASER
frasercain@gmail.com
⚖️ LICENSE
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to use my work for any purpose you like, just mention me as the source and link back to this video. 
Наука
"Dark knocking sound" 💀. Coruscant
That's got my vote too. Perfect question/answer duo.
*[Coruscant],* without a doubt. Love the idea!!!
And thanks as always, Fraser! I eternally appreciate every aspect of your work.
Coruscant : I always thought the term dark gravity did the job fairly well.
[Coruscant] Definitey. Might drop a Q in on that one soon too.
Fraser's answer to Mandalore at the end was profoundly scientifically versed. I for one neglected the speed of gravity aspect. Excellent stuff. The more one knows, the more one senses they have yet left to learn, fostering among other things, humility.
31:32 "...we can't detect a planet around the closest star" Disagree! Try ALMA : Atacama Large Milimetre Array - one can see emissions in the milimetre range and see planets forming round stars.
[Mandalore] Same here, never consciously considered the speed either.
@@simonmultiverse6349 He's talking about Earth sized planets. The closest we've found yet (I think, correct me if I'm wrong) is roughly twice our planet's mass.
To put another hitch in everything, we have evidence the speed of light (and as such atomic decay) is not fixed, so is it related to the speed of gravity? Are they independent?
@Smee Self The first one I've heard of was tonight, .99 Earth mass. That's the closest yet, they can't tell if it has no atmosphere or if it's really dense.
Hoth. The other way to get communications over long distances is retransmission (retrans), vastly easier than a receiving antenna the size of a planet. Old tech, easy to do, and exactly what the Mars orbiter does to help the Mars rovers.
Dagobah...I remember there's a way a fission reactor's excess radiation can shield a spacecraft. I'd be more like a mini heliosphere than a magnetosphere.
Good morning and kudos Fraser from Slovakia, thank You for another great video. Everytime I listen to your in-depth yet well explained answer it prompts even more questions :)
Regarding CMB, I was thinking about resolution of the smallest feature within the CMB map and if we could see / detect changes in CMB polarization or amplitude over time to map the "bubbles" in 3D like CT scans of CMB to obtain more info. This would require to "progressively scan" entire sky at regular intervals.
Great video as always. Keep up the good work. 👍🏻
I am always amused by the animations of the early solar system, the asteroid belt, the Kuiper belt and the Oort cloud on how the universe works. I knew they were far apart not quite as far apart as you just explained but in those animations it looks like you could jump from one rock to another! I wish they would explain this once in a while.
😂😂 “space, it’s right there in the name” great line 🤣
[Dagobah] Seems an obvious question to ask, but first time I recall seeing it asked and answered. Thanks.
A question I'd love for you to address on a Q&A: Is the red-shift of light determined by the speed the object is moving when it's emitted, or is it determined by how much the space it's been traveling through has expanded over time? Do both effect the red-shift? (More below)
I want to elaborate on this question a bit more, but I offered a short version you could display on the Q&A video. My confusion comes from the analogy that is made between Doppler shift and red-shift, which seems very different from the phenomenon of light being stretched by spacetime while it's traveling. I have some confusion about both explanations, so I'll separate them below.
*Doppler Shift*
When a car is moving away from you and makes a sound the sound is Doppler shifted since the source of the pressure waves is moving away as it creates them. I don't understand how such a thing could happen with light, given it is quantized and emits all at once. Another reason this doesn't make sense to me is that more distant objects would have been moving away from us more slowly when they emitted the light we see, yet unintuitively (given this reasoning) they have a greater redshift.
*Expansion of space*
I've seen animations of light slowly red-shifting over time as it travels, which implies to me that the expansion of spacetime is "stretching" the waveform of the photon and thus changing it's wavelength (tangent; where is the lost energy of this photon going?). If this is how red-shifting works, how do we actually know the speed of an object given this information? Wouldn't it only tell us the total expansion of spacetime between that object and earth, specifically during the travel time of that photon? If the rate of expansion is changing over time, or different depending on the region, how could we possibly tell? The light wouldn't encode how much it was "stretched" at different points in time assumedly, so do our calculations include assumptions to combat this? For example, the rate of expansion being consistent across the cosmos?
The entire concept of an expanding infinite spacetime is hard for me to grasp, so I apologize if this line of reasoning isn't sound.
Always enjoyable.
QUESTION: Are comets mostly rubble-pile objects?
Love your show
Couldn't pick just one!
Great Q&As this week!
Tatooine
Mustafar
Dagobah
Mandalore
Hoth
Very good question. Even better answer.
[Mustafar], I enjoyed the answer by the explanation by Fraser.
Hoth. Grreat Q&A!
There was a problem with magnetic shielding. They could get the shield down to lower energy, but apparently the baddies can follow the field lines around and through the astronauts.
Metal was also put down as shielding, as bombardment would make them spray particles in the direction of the insides of the ship.
I used to read news on this stuff.
Was gravity much stronger in the early time of the universe because space itself was smaller and therefore the effects were much more pronounced and impacted stars / galaxy formation to be faster than anticipated but it hasn't been accounted for in simulations properly or something? It seems like we're getting close to figuring this out pretty well and then more questions to figure out. Great video! 😊
ONE thing bout space is? There's a lot of it out there.
On life elsewhere in the universe, I keep going back to two thoughts: 1) we are already reasonably sure that chemistry works the same throughout the universe; 2) we've really only barely begun to search for life elsewhere, so it's way too early to draw conclusions.
We have an incredible tendency to “overthink”.
If we receive a message saying, “Don’t do X.”, and that message doesn’t include not only a detailed explanation of WHY, but also some form of PROOF of the negative outcome…. More than likely, some of us will assume the motivation for telling us not to do it, is to “hold us back” in our development/advancement.
We will change the name of dark matter. Hopefully, the new name reflects what we learn about what it is rather than a more correct description of what it isn't.
Wow so many good questions! I can't choose whether the best is Bespin or Coruscant...
Naboo. Expanding sphere of observation to understand if there is life. Copernican principle via expanding (counter)indications.
I bet that astronomy will get a lot more attention with several articles about the universal "Dark Attractor"
I suspect that dark matter is a combination of there being more stuff we can't see that makes gravity act in ways we don't understand. If we really want to have fun with the name we'd call it spooky phantom pirate space ghosts and send a probe called the mystery machine to figure it out 👍
Ruh-roh…. Better be sure to bring enough Scooby snacks
@@bobinthewest8559 we're gonna find out dark matter was just old man Withers with a mask, flashlight and a whistle playing with giant magnets in that spooky old abandoned amusement park.
It’s obviously space vampires. We just can’t see them because all of the most powerful telescopes use mirrors.
Dagoba A great practical answer
Oops forgot the "h"
it's amazing that the earth has it's own shield.
Hi Fraser,
I was reading an article about the 'Wow' signal and it got me wondering. What would the 1974 Aricebo message look like to a distant alien civilisation if they detected it? Would it seem like the wow signal, a one off never repeated signal with unique specificity?
Question: How come it seems like space objects are always made of one single material instead of everything being a mixture of all materials? Comets are mostly ice. Some astroids are metal, some are rock, but most asteroids are made of mostly one material. Why is that? Why isn't every object in space a mishmash of everything?
Got Naboo on the mind👍🏾
Always thought you'd do better just talking about what you know instead of reading your Resume at the beginning of each broadcast. I find myself listening closer now ! Gr8 Show !
I had no idea distances between asteroids, etc. Were so far!
Speed reading the blurb above (the video description) I saw "Do aliens block their space toilets?"
I'll get my coat.
I had no idea the distance between space rocks were so vast.
I kept expecting the dark forest theory to come up in this episode.
Why does interstellar dust collect in lanes in a galaxy like Andromeda? Why is it not a similar distribution to the stars which are producing it?
Has there been any change in the cosmic microwave background since we first mapped it? Or do we even continue mapping the C.M.B?
Thanks!
Coruscant. My recommendation is to rename Dark Matter to Dark Gravity.
24:10 I think the problem we have with CMB being where it is, is that it is where and when it is. We see it as a shell, but we're used to the fact we see things **where** they are. This leads to the misconception that the universe was this size we see it at now, while that can't be the case. What actually happens is that we see the creation of the universe as it goes on.
Why? Dark Matter is matter. We know this because we've observed it displaced from the Baryonic matter content in a galaxy (the Bullet Cluster).
I think they're misjudging gravity.
Light hits a point where it doesn't get smaller but it gets dimmer, what if gravity has a minimum effect on matter regardless of the distance? At a certain point it just doesn't get any smaller yet it never disappears.
NABOO? Speaking of statistics, how about definitive knowledge about the galactic neighborhood within twenty years instead of hundreds? This topic reminded me of a lecture given by Dr. Davies I attended about almost twenty years ago at the Beyond Institute down here at ASU, Tempe. FYI - This was around the same time frame Dr Lawrence Krauss founded the Origins Project @TheOriginsPodcast which eventually led to the ASU Interplanetary Initiative @asuinterplanetaryinitiative. At the time of this lecture Dr. Davies worked closely with SETI and he claimed the modern multi-spectral radio telescope technology being used by SETI had become so efficient at scanning multiple frequencies simultaneously they calculated the probability was near unity that within the next twenty years any search being conducted would have detected all radio broadcasts from any technological civilization that was transmitting radio signal at levels similar to Earth -- if they are at all common out there! The scientists concluded that if SETI didn't hear anything after twenty years of constant listening we might as well turn off our receivers and rethink the entire problem. Either no one is out there or they aren't using old fashioned radio any more. Any thoughts? Start looking for lasers, or even entire stars blinking out signals in galactic Morse Code? Neutrinos anyone?
Maybe Oort "cloud" or Kuiper "belt" and all those illustrations showing them as dense floating gravel fields are a tad misleading too :)
Tatooine. Well, Arrakis/Dune too. What do we know or think how life can surive and evolve on a world that was once lush with vegetation and water and seas, but has been a dry desert for eons? Where is the oxygen in the atmosphere coming from? Not Venuslike worlds, just your average scifi desert world where human might live on.
How would I go about measuring the rotation rate of a galaxy on my own?
Prof David Kipping of Columbia University has an interesting lecture on the Fermi paradox that was expressed in a way I hadn't really considered; he has it on his channel "Cool Worlds Classroom" titled "Why we might be alone" Public lecture by Prof David Kipping if you're interested. Anyways all these topics are so cool, [Bespin] would be my vote.
One of the cool things about Cool Worlds (David Kipping), is that most of the time he examines BOTH points of view.
For example, along with the video “Why We Might Be Alone”, the channel also has a juxtaposed video titled (something like) “Why We Might Live In a Crowded Universe”.
It’s another wonderful channel which I think would be appreciated by anyone who appreciates this one.
My biggest gripe with the galaxy rotation curve problem is that we assume there must either be missing matter or a misunderstanding of gravity. But what if it's an entirely different force at play? Why isn't electromagnetic force more seriously considered as the invisible glue holding galaxies together? 99% of matter in space is plasma, plasma at different electrical potentials don't mix (i.e. they could form bubbles or cells), and electromagnetism is many orders of magnitude stronger than gravity. Stars would only need a small electrical charge in order for their orbits to be dramatically affected by ambient electric and magnetic fields. We can see huge coherent magnetic fields throughout the spiral arms of galaxies, but as far as I understand, we don't have a way of directly observing electric fields from a distance, so they're just as invisible as any dark matter candidate!
My vote is for Tatooine.
Question: Was there ever a point where the constellation Orion crossed the elliptic? If yes, can it happen again? Thank you.
mandalore- if you can see it, it's pulling you to where it was.
Could Dark Matter be a defunct, older universe?
Tatooine ☀️ ☀️
Question about the twin paradox:
If Alice remains on Earth, always experiencing the same acceleration (10 m/s²), and Bob goes on a trip, but his ship always maintain the same acceleration (10 m/s²) for the entire trip, holding a speed close to the speed of light for the majority of the time, when Bobs meets Alice again, will be any time dilation between the two?
Spaceships made from Ice! Now there's an idea
I argue dark matter should be renamed 'Placeholder 1'
If there was no interstellar dust how much brighter would the night sky be?
How do we know red dwarfs are fully convective?
[Tatooine] hmmm ... I was duped. 😊
[Kamino]: loved your interview with Logan Smith (and all your content really). I never bought into NASA saying Orion would take crew to Mars for the reason that the astronauts would go crazy locked in a capsule for months. Is that still NASA's plan or do you think they'll use a much roomier Starship assuming it becomes human rated?
I think there’s absolutely life in the universe, it’s just not what most people expect. Imagine if humans never existed. I’d guess most planets look like an offshoot of that.
Tatooine
The density of material that people think exists in asteroid belts would actually be present in very thick nebula where stars and planets are forming, right? Do you think astronomers should create a "thickness scale" for debris fields in space? Heck, with a name like "thickness scale" it should get some press too.
Coruscant!
[Coruscant], this s one fascinates me. Is it possible that the entire universe and all it's combined mass could be un unconsidered variable? Like the universe should be calculated like any other hunk of mass in the universe? I'm not knowledgeable on how scientists even begin to calculate this stuff but if there is another series of universes maybe our universe is sort of like a galaxy in a space comprised of many universes . I hope this make sense. Many of these big questions put me at a loss for words because they really make your mind work.
The star R136a1 is fusing hydrogen in its core. It's a main sequence Wolf-Rayet star: WN5hV. A lot of folks are uncomfortable with this. But that's the definition (cf "Oxford Dictionary of Astronomy".) And being a main sequence star it's also a "dwarf" (cf ibid.)
Aren’t all main sequence stars “fusing hydrogen in their cores”?
To the person who asked about space toilets.
I have tried a new diet plan, where I eat for 3 days and fast for 3 days.
My body has developed to a point where it uses almost
100% of everything I take in !
There is almost 0 waste !
I am NEVER hungry and I am not weak !
Perhaps if astronauts could perfect this type of technology , space toilets would become
practically obsolete
I believe that waste comes from over consuming!
DML
[Hoth] - The "send a message back home" is always the part I wondered about. Wouldn't Proxima itself overwhelm any possible signal anything small we could send?
In the Dark Matter / Curvature discussion. You correctly point out that calling it Dark Matter might not be the best idea, since it might not be matter, and it could be a wrong theory for gravity instead. There is also another possibility, that our way of measuring speeds of stars is not working as we think it is.
I think it’s commonly admitted/acknowledged that our understanding of gravity is incomplete.
Also, I’m sure that those humble enough, will admit the possibility that our measurements could be off to some degree…. Potentially influenced by as yet undiscovered/unrecognized phenomena/phenomenon, just as our view is skewed when looking into water.
@@bobinthewest8559 - yes, but I never hear anyone mention that possibility.
Question: If Jupiter was 1 AU from the Sun and the Earth was a moon of it, could Earth still support life? Would there be much change at all? Or, for example, the repeated eclipses of the Sun by Jupiter as Earth orbits, and Jupiter's strong magnetic field, cause temperature and weather changes, impact on technology, etc.?
Along with Jupiter’s strong magnetic field are spectacularly deadly radiation bands, Van Allen belts on steroids. If Earth were orbiting Jupiter at roughly Io-Europa distance that radiation would probably preclude stable biology, getting constantly ripped apart by high-energy nucleons.
there should be no problem getting enough solar energy for interstellar transmission from a target star any probe is sent to. just have to make sure the probes brings some solar panels
I was sitting here putting peanut🥜butter on my crackers and eating them while I was👀watching this episode...🤘🏼💯✔️
Mandalore 👌🤯
Does gravity get lensed by massive objects in the same way that light is lensed?
{Coruscant} Would installing a couple of Kilometer wide focused beam Dishes on the moon enhance the communication between Earth and Mars?
How do we know the universe is expanding, rather than the speed of light changing over time?
4:44 No, Dark Matter cannot be due merely to a misunderstanding of how gravity works at the largest scales. We've used Dark Matter as a telescope. It's a thing. Not a force. It's some kind of stuff that, as seen in the Bullet Cluster, has a position in space separate from the baryonic matter. No MOND can explain this. (Not without losing the ability to explain all the other lines of evidence from CMBR, galactic rotation, gravitational lenses, etc.)
[Coruscant] SPOOKY ENERGY
Speaking of fusion drives I've seen a video by the Angry Astronaut by a company called helios they are actually working on a fusion drive space ship.
'La Nube de Oort está tan lejos que queda en la Nube del Orto.' (Argentine Astrophysicists dixit 🇦🇷)
Hi thanks for a great show.
Will we ever reach a point where all the light that was set free by recombination finally reaches us from our point of view and the CMB stops "shining" for observers on Earth?
You said that the rules of the universe where, well...universal. But I thought there was some debate about the Hubble constant not being, well constant. Can you discuss the implications of that?
I remember hearing one astrophysicist refer to it as "anomalous mass" rather than "dark matter". I tend to think that implies that there is actually an object of some sort involved, but am not sure whether that's better or worse substituting "gravity" for "mass".
Except that it might not even be mass if it turns out that our theories of gravity are just wrong. Although, it does definitely seem like invisible matter explains the most anomalies.
Question;
Can or will the JWST be used to find planet 9? If so, what could we expect regarding its contribution to the investigation?
I know how gravity fields are displayed - like heavy balls on a flexible sheet - but I have no idea how gravity 'propagates' through a gravity well. Recent experiment proves gravity travels in waves.
If two distant black holes collide does the gravity go past the sun faster than through it? Does it diffract? Maybe it combines on the other side in diffraction patterns?
Could this be the cause of Dark Matter - gravity being 'in phase' and having a larger effect?
No matter how far we look without finding life, let's say 100 light years, that's not 0 living planets / 100 LYs, it's 1 living planet / 100 LYs. The numerator never drops to zero, so the probability never drops to zero. No matter how unlikely life is, we know it's possible, therefore it must be possible elsewhere.
There is a possibility that this universe can host life but not generate it. If we ever found precursor like ancient civilization tech, we could assume that they started our planets life artificially. The precursors themselves would have been from another universe where life arises naturally very easily.
So if we look out and see that there is no life across many galaxies and our simulations never get life to fully arise, then we could say life cannot arise naturally.
@@zs9652 I'm pretty sure if we found evidence of a long passed advanced alien civilisation, it would be seen as evidence of the ubiquity of life, not the absence / impossibility of it.
[Naboo] for me 👍
Are we detecting changes in the cosmic background radiation pattern through time?
they are able to map out the location of dark matter through its gravitational lensing effects, and galaxies have been found that do not appear to have dark matter. I wonder what their rotation rates reflect in terms of their mass
Tatooine, another but the many I am sure are not very big, and you'd probably be moving by so fast,
would you even know you had a close call of some of the smaller ones?
I think Invisible Entity would be a better name? Or Unknown Entity better yet?
Dark Mass
🤘
21:13 instructions to build a machine? now what does that remind me of? :-)
22:25 bingo!
26:39 but it is already too late to avoid detection. if there is a hostile civilisation out there, it is only a matter of time before they detect us and show up on our doorstep. or send instructions to build a machine :-)
28:07 don't panic! the answer is 42.
31:35 hm, 6 support struts for the secondary mirror. that means the stars in those images will have 6 diffraction spikes.
Question: At what distance from a planet or star is an object "free" from the gravitational pull from that body? Of course it depends on the mass of the planet or star. We know from basic physics that the potential energy of an object in a gravity well only comes back up to zero at an infinite distance from the body. But long before we get that far, the force of gravity drops off to the point where it is small compared with other forces acting on the object, e.g. propulsion. In low earth orbit, the force of gravity is only slightly less than that on the surface of the earth. How far away from earth would our spacecraft with a wimpy drive have to be to be able to resist earth's gravity and follow an arbitrary course? I'm looking for a rule of thumb, not an exact quantity.
[ Coruscant ] One question i have always wondered and never here any Space channels mention or talk about is the "Dark" its self. I mean it is everywhere Black, as soon as there are no lights on as an example underground it becomes instantly Black/Dark and the whole of space also has dark and black everywhere. Is it something like dark matter that we can not detect yet that allows light to become light/light up as it is amplified/reflected through whatever the Dark/Black is?
The really weird thing is that, it is not “dark” in space.
The blackness that you “see”…. Is the absence of matter for the light to reflect off of. In other words…. Where you see blackness…. You are essentially looking between “objects” which can reflect light towards your eyes.
What is interstellar dust made of?
It's not just "is there intelligent life in the universe." It's also is there presently intelligent life in the universe. There could have been millions of inhabited worlds, a billion years ago...
Dark gravity is an effect observed in/around galaxies do we observe this effect at any scale larger than galaxies or around any other objects?
Thanks for the Mustafar answer, it definitely helped. But I'm still having problems understanding it all. Is the very fact that we can even see some cmb thanks to the inflation that was much faster than speed of light and we got so far from the rest of universe at T=0 that we can still see parts of it even 13B years after? Will cmb stop at some point in time? (due to the expansion of the universe?)
The CMB will eventually redshift (stretch out the waves) until it’s impossible to see. So kinda.
> why can we still see it, inflation, etc?
There’s always more universe that’s further away, so there’s always somewhere (a sphere around us) that more CMB can arrive from… it’s not necessary for the universe to “warp big” to allow CMB arriving as late as it does. Just “fast.” Say a nerf gun gets shot at a R/C car, but the R/C car is driving away from the Nerf…it’s going to take a lot longer for the dart to arrive as the distance got bigger even though the Car is slower than the Dart.
the ultimate future toilet will be some nanite swarm that hangs out in your colon and bladder 24/7 and turns all matter to something useful or gas that is converted to be sterile and odorless and be able to be controlled so that you can choose the time when its necessary to fart lol
Yes…. You would use farts to move about the spacecraft.
@@bobinthewest8559 a man of culture!
How about navigating the rings of saturn?