Adam, thanks for your suggestions to the software developers for improving WBPP. I love PixInsight and WBPP is of course the corner stone of my image processing. Don’t know what I would do without it.
Assembling a 24 panel mosaic currently. Ran WBPP individually for each panel originally, took many many hours only to realize I forgot to include flat frames. Came back and found this. What an absolute huge save in time and effort.
Great information I’ve been watching all of these videos one by one I’ve newer to Astro photography and very new to Pixinsite but after years of using PS have made the switch for cleaning everything up and then do final touches in PS. For the 2600MC Pro can I get away with just using bias frames as well?
I am glad you are enjoying the information. I am not familiar with the characteristics of every camera... hard to keep track. Most sensors in general are well-behaved and biases are the way to go. There are a few outliers that have ruined the party... you just need to know if you have one of those!
If you use WBPP for pre-processing to calibrate the lights from multiple nights only and do not register and integrate the data but want to do this at a later date (as you may want to get additional data in other nights and integrate these as well) , do you just load the calibrated lights and run register/integrate to obtain masters in addition to using the new data that is not calibrated but needs calibration files and needs the pre-processing calibration. I hope this makes sense. Thanks
I wanted to try a mosaic putting the heart and soul nebulas from separate nights (separate calibration frames) together, so I watched this video. I don’t understand about the keywords.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
I have planned a lot of video games growing up, and worked as an engineer, but I have to say, PI is one of the coolest programs I have come across!
Adam, thanks for your suggestions to the software developers for improving WBPP. I love PixInsight and WBPP is of course the corner stone of my image processing. Don’t know what I would do without it.
Assembling a 24 panel mosaic currently. Ran WBPP individually for each panel originally, took many many hours only to realize I forgot to include flat frames. Came back and found this. What an absolute huge save in time and effort.
This is what a configurable pipeline (automation script) is all about.
GREAT, THANK YOU
Great series! Thank you for keeping us up to date with WBPP!
Great information I’ve been watching all of these videos one by one I’ve newer to Astro photography and very new to Pixinsite but after years of using PS have made the switch for cleaning everything up and then do final touches in PS. For the 2600MC Pro can I get away with just using bias frames as well?
I am glad you are enjoying the information. I am not familiar with the characteristics of every camera... hard to keep track. Most sensors in general are well-behaved and biases are the way to go. There are a few outliers that have ruined the party... you just need to know if you have one of those!
If you use WBPP for pre-processing to calibrate the lights from multiple nights only and do not register and integrate the data but want to do this at a later date (as you may want to get additional data in other nights and integrate these as well) , do you just load the calibrated lights and run register/integrate to obtain masters in addition to using the new data that is not calibrated but needs calibration files and needs the pre-processing calibration. I hope this makes sense. Thanks
I wanted to try a mosaic putting the heart and soul nebulas from separate nights (separate calibration frames) together, so I watched this video.
I don’t understand about the keywords.