Hi! Please can u make a similar video for Paper 3 Qs 15m, 25m. Super helpful and straight to the point. Loved this content and all ur videos. Thanks a lot!!!
Quite challenging to do for 15 and 25 because they can be so different but what I would say is for a 15 marker, aim for three issues! For paper 3, it’ll be data response so respond to the data. Find the clues in the extracts to drive your points and then let the theory take over within your chains of analysis! Might not say you need a diagram but examiner most likely expects one! For a 25 marker, ensure you break the question down, what is the examiner asking for? Again, find the information in the extracts to drive your arguments! Remember to evaluate throughout, this doesn’t simply mean a counter point but evaluative language and considering the bigger picture, for example what do these points depend upon?
Hi ive just spread your channel acrosss and my friend wanted me to ask you , for the 10 marker in P3, is 1 piece of evidence/extract per point you m,ake enough. ie this is how we do it: Define key terms P1) The data supports the argument that ( ...) because the data shows that GDP rose by ...... ( quote what exactly the data shows). --) - this therefore shows that..- Thisis becuase ( use Economic theory) do i then have to being in another piece of evidence from the extract or is 1 per point enough? Thanks. P2) same thing P3) same thing P4) Evaluation of data. P5) Judgement. ---does the data provided in the extracts answer the question that youve been asked - IF SO Clearly state yes to the examminer and explain why. Thanks.
So for the 10 marker, I wouldn’t bother defining key terms. I would have 3 analytical paragraphs, and one evaluative paragraph. Where you include the limitation of the data is up to you…final paragraph or in one of your earlier! How much data you use is dependent on the paper! How many figures are presented in the data? Clearly it has to be realistic to time allocated. My advice would be, as you’re reading the figures, calculate and annotate a plan whilst doing so!
Hi and for the 25 marker, where your given an exteract and told to use it ie for P1-3, is using 1 piecve of data/contezt per paragraph enbough for level 5 ( assuming that the knowledsdge is good and the diagrams are drawn and evlauaiton is included, With a final paragaph includign a judgement. Thanks.
@@biz-omics8348 sorry . So for the 25 marker is using 1 piece of data and context from the extracts provided per paragraph I do enough. Ie INTRO- define terms and give judgement P1) Point because therefore THEN USE CONTEXT ? so is 1 piece of Evidence from the extracts per Paragraph enough ? Thanks a lot your a absolute savior from your videos
For a 25 marker I would: Small P1: intro, define key concepts. P2: argument 1: point, reasons behind the point, use evidence (data) to support your point, then offer logical chains of analysis. P3: evaluation of argument, e.g. what does this depend upon? P4: argument 2 P5: evaluation of such argument P6: overall judgement! Make sure there is weighted justification! Regarding diagrams, very dependent on the question. Majority of the time, there will be plenty of diagrammatical opportunities.
What are the points you would include ikn the part where you would alk abotu the limitatiso of the data. ie how long ago it was produced, the timre frame ti was prodiuced between, missing thinfgs that could have been included ie ....
I would focus my limitations on figure 3, which considers profit before tax and interest. As both airlines originate from different countries, they would have different tax systems and also as we don’t know the airline’s level of gearing, we’re unsure on the amount of interest charged and how both might impact retained profits and R&D.
So, you’ll have to very much base it on what the question asks. Whatever you do, don’t force both macro and micro content. Just consider what the question is asking, what evidence is in the extracts and use that to guide your analytical arguments and evaluation. If it lends itself to both macro and micro then perfect! Often it’s based on policy decisions and usually the policies are mentioned in the case study but clearly, we won’t know until the time you sit the exam! If the issue is very much macro but micro market decisions are needed then just ensure you link back to what the question is asking and the wider, macro issue!
Hi! Please can u make a similar video for Paper 3 Qs 15m, 25m. Super helpful and straight to the point. Loved this content and all ur videos. Thanks a lot!!!
Quite challenging to do for 15 and 25 because they can be so different but what I would say is for a 15 marker, aim for three issues! For paper 3, it’ll be data response so respond to the data. Find the clues in the extracts to drive your points and then let the theory take over within your chains of analysis! Might not say you need a diagram but examiner most likely expects one! For a 25 marker, ensure you break the question down, what is the examiner asking for? Again, find the information in the extracts to drive your arguments! Remember to evaluate throughout, this doesn’t simply mean a counter point but evaluative language and considering the bigger picture, for example what do these points depend upon?
@biz-omics8348 God Bless You!! Thanks to all your videos, I felt very confident in my exam! Thanks for the speedy reply as well.
Hi ive just spread your channel acrosss and my friend wanted me to ask you , for the 10 marker in P3, is 1 piece of evidence/extract per point you m,ake enough.
ie this is how we do it:
Define key terms
P1) The data supports the argument that ( ...) because the data shows that GDP rose by ...... ( quote what exactly the data shows). --)
- this therefore shows that..-
Thisis becuase ( use Economic theory)
do i then have to being in another piece of evidence from the extract or is 1 per point enough? Thanks.
P2) same thing
P3) same thing
P4) Evaluation of data.
P5) Judgement. ---does the data provided in the extracts answer the question that youve been asked - IF SO Clearly state yes to the examminer and explain why.
Thanks.
So for the 10 marker, I wouldn’t bother defining key terms. I would have 3 analytical paragraphs, and one evaluative paragraph. Where you include the limitation of the data is up to you…final paragraph or in one of your earlier! How much data you use is dependent on the paper! How many figures are presented in the data? Clearly it has to be realistic to time allocated. My advice would be, as you’re reading the figures, calculate and annotate a plan whilst doing so!
Hi and for the 25 marker, where your given an exteract and told to use it ie for P1-3, is using 1 piecve of data/contezt per paragraph enbough for level 5 ( assuming that the knowledsdge is good and the diagrams are drawn and evlauaiton is included, With a final paragaph includign a judgement. Thanks.
One piece of evidence per paragraph?
@@biz-omics8348 sorry . So for the 25 marker is using 1 piece of data and context from the extracts provided per paragraph I do enough.
Ie
INTRO- define terms and give judgement
P1) Point because therefore THEN USE CONTEXT ?
so is 1 piece of Evidence from the extracts per Paragraph enough ?
Thanks a lot your a absolute savior from your videos
For a 25 marker I would:
Small P1: intro, define key concepts.
P2: argument 1: point, reasons behind the point, use evidence (data) to support your point, then offer logical chains of analysis.
P3: evaluation of argument, e.g. what does this depend upon?
P4: argument 2
P5: evaluation of such argument
P6: overall judgement! Make sure there is weighted justification!
Regarding diagrams, very dependent on the question. Majority of the time, there will be plenty of diagrammatical opportunities.
What are the points you would include ikn the part where you would alk abotu the limitatiso of the data. ie how long ago it was produced, the timre frame ti was prodiuced between, missing thinfgs that could have been included ie ....
I would focus my limitations on figure 3, which considers profit before tax and interest. As both airlines originate from different countries, they would have different tax systems and also as we don’t know the airline’s level of gearing, we’re unsure on the amount of interest charged and how both might impact retained profits and R&D.
hey, I wanted to ask for the 25 marker if the question is more of macro are u able to talk about micro content or just macro.
So, you’ll have to very much base it on what the question asks. Whatever you do, don’t force both macro and micro content. Just consider what the question is asking, what evidence is in the extracts and use that to guide your analytical arguments and evaluation. If it lends itself to both macro and micro then perfect! Often it’s based on policy decisions and usually the policies are mentioned in the case study but clearly, we won’t know until the time you sit the exam! If the issue is very much macro but micro market decisions are needed then just ensure you link back to what the question is asking and the wider, macro issue!
@@biz-omics8348 thank youu.