Loved the analysis during the critical decision 26. Nxe4 ( 17:26 ). Based on how good it looked initially I probably would have played it right then. Its inspiring how disciplined you were in looking for (and finding) opponents' defensive resources and then evaluating that position. I often fail at this.
Good game sir! I think 29.Nd3 to trade bishops would have been better. As it turned out to be a very strong piece later in the game! I remembered Anand-Carlsen game in gashimov memorial round 1 when they agreed to a draw in Marshall gambit though Anand being up a pawn.
Loved the analysis during the critical decision 26. Nxe4 ( 17:26 ). Based on how good it looked initially I probably would have played it right then. Its inspiring how disciplined you were in looking for (and finding) opponents' defensive resources and then evaluating that position. I often fail at this.
"Engine doesn't know what it wants" XD
Good game sir! I think 29.Nd3 to trade bishops would have been better. As it turned out to be a very strong piece later in the game! I remembered Anand-Carlsen game in gashimov memorial round 1 when they agreed to a draw in Marshall gambit though Anand being up a pawn.
Praveen Kumar Thanks, Praveen! 29.Nd3 is possible, though I can respond with 29...Bd6+, avoiding a trade.
instructional video!
Thank you! I remember this game - some cool calculations here :)