How Jet Fuel Is Made From Trash | WSJ

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 май 2024
  • Sustainable aviation fuel - or SAF - helps cut down air travel’s carbon emissions. SAF is seeing a large surge in investment that could fuel its growth after the industry has spent years trying to take off with efforts to decarbonize flights.
    WSJ takes a look at the SAF supply problem, and how airlines and the government are pumping money into the low-carbon fuel sector to help get this industry off the ground.
    0:00 Jet fuel from garbage
    0:57 SAF, explained
    1:42 Fulcrum BioEnergy
    3:42 SAF’s supply problem
    6:32 SAF’s cost problem
    News Explainers
    Some days the high-speed news cycle can bring more questions than answers. WSJ’s news explainers break down the day's biggest stories into bite-size pieces to help you make sense of the news.
    #SAF #Aviation #WSJ

Комментарии • 233

  • @wdd3141
    @wdd3141 10 месяцев назад +54

    Producing SAF is expensive! But then, I suppose the same was true for gasoline in the beginning, and as the manufacturing technology becomes more refined, the costs will come down. This is a worthwhile path to take.

    • @lukeliu7162
      @lukeliu7162 10 месяцев назад +1

      hydrogen

    • @JWooden271
      @JWooden271 10 месяцев назад +5

      Gasoline was originally a byproduct of refining kerosene. Cheap as free. Standard Oil would simply dump the stuff, until it's explosive properties found a market in the then-new automotive industry.

    • @fvosteezyy
      @fvosteezyy 10 месяцев назад +3

      What the other commentator said, Gasoline was never expensive upon its discovery. It was so worthless at the time, it was dumped as waste.

  • @seankim2743
    @seankim2743 10 месяцев назад +109

    Good stuff. SAF probably will get more spotlights for investors as these projects pop up into reality.

    • @ghostmourn
      @ghostmourn 10 месяцев назад

      As Great as putting Corn alcohol in the car fuel! Dohhh

    • @roxaskinghearts
      @roxaskinghearts 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@ghostmourn 80% of our corn was used in feed before china stopped imports any more childish whatifism

    • @roxaskinghearts
      @roxaskinghearts 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@Riorozen cost affective he says yeah its cost effective not needing to port anything on the back of a tankard for hundreds of miles specially when the trash is already there and then can be found new means to be funded into it like recycling 2.0

    • @d.h.601
      @d.h.601 10 месяцев назад +1

      This is not good stuff.

    • @nsshing
      @nsshing 6 месяцев назад

      You mean more pump and dump? lol

  • @fourthdeconstruction
    @fourthdeconstruction 10 месяцев назад +68

    Of course, this makes more sense than electric planes or hydrogen power planes because it's a realistic approach.

    • @h3xl4
      @h3xl4 10 месяцев назад +11

      Interesting point. I would add that this approach also doesn’t require development of new planes and infrastructure to accommodate and scale up the usage of batteries or hydrogen for planes. This is a huge plus.

    • @d.h.601
      @d.h.601 10 месяцев назад +1

      Absolute malarkey.

    • @fourthdeconstruction
      @fourthdeconstruction 10 месяцев назад +2

      @@d.h.601 ghee. Someone that doesn't know about numbers and technology shows up. As far as I can tell you from my engineering background and from studying all cases, electric planes make sense until battery tech improves a lot, heck we don't even have enough battery material to produce all the EVs that we need.
      As for the hydrogen, it's just a waste of time to make it work in the airline industry or air cargo. Just hydrogen availability is a big problem as we can only produce black hydrogen and just a little then you have to break all the challenges of hydrogen storage both inside the plane and at the airports, then you have to deal with all issues with running a hydrogen powered jet engine and I can tell you that they're a lot of issues. But i guess that you can solve these issues by yourself. Right?

    • @embededfabrication4482
      @embededfabrication4482 10 месяцев назад

      @@d.h.601 yup, people have been claiming they're going to do fischer tropsch chemsitry with garbage for years, too many problems, it's easier to just use coal to make liquid fuel.

    • @embededfabrication4482
      @embededfabrication4482 10 месяцев назад

      @@fourthdeconstruction if you're an engineer do a little research, people have been slinging this trash to liquid fuel BS for years, it's got too many issues, mainly all work and energy goes into making that nice fluffy dry feedstock garbage you see in the beginning. if they're gonna do it best to just use coal like Sasol does.

  • @coltmccoy5864
    @coltmccoy5864 10 месяцев назад +45

    This is why the US needs better public transportation such as high speed rail. Being able to connect close locations together would cut aviation use.

    • @GamerbyDesign
      @GamerbyDesign 10 месяцев назад

      I wouldn't hold my breath.

    • @zack9912000
      @zack9912000 10 месяцев назад +1

      I would never use that. It was a great glace to be robbed and assaulted.

    • @mikejf4377
      @mikejf4377 9 месяцев назад +3

      About high speed rail, if they build it, it needs to be only for transportation of people. No commercial transportation on those rails so as not to damage the rail with wait. The last President reduced the regulation on trains and now we’re having many more problems with them because they make longer heavier trains and they are creating more problems. We need to reinstate the regulations and put money into the infrastructure to repair all our rail systems.

  • @BroAnarchy
    @BroAnarchy 10 месяцев назад +8

    "... You mean Garbage can be used.... for GOOD??"
    ... this man speaks to me

  • @veteran011
    @veteran011 10 месяцев назад +12

    So, for context, 100,000 gallons of AvGas would equate to ~30hr of flight time in a 747 or ~50hr of flight time in an A350. That's miniscule.

  • @elvispresley3340
    @elvispresley3340 10 месяцев назад +2

    Great news - I hope it all adds up in the end. CHEERS from AUSTRALIA.

  • @bananasenpai
    @bananasenpai 10 месяцев назад +34

    Fulcrum is still private. Would love to invest in a company that's working on something so important.

    • @Gdsamplify
      @Gdsamplify 10 месяцев назад

      Hope you go bankrupt

    • @snakepl1skin
      @snakepl1skin 10 месяцев назад

      Most are , my company uses already leftover animal fats and used cooking oils left overs to produce saf but sadly still private 😢

    • @mhxxd4
      @mhxxd4 10 месяцев назад +1

      They dont need your money and want all their profits

    • @sisk22
      @sisk22 10 месяцев назад

      @@mhxxd4that’s not how investments work

    • @BangBangBang.
      @BangBangBang. 10 месяцев назад +1

      duh they're waiting to go public with a ridiculous valuation

  • @AnDrEw17876
    @AnDrEw17876 10 месяцев назад +5

    Lots of european airlines have been using SAF for years already

  • @vicentecorrea5267
    @vicentecorrea5267 27 дней назад

    This is what is needed, honestly!

  • @alexanderhofvander2945
    @alexanderhofvander2945 10 месяцев назад +7

    It is a good reason go empty the pacific garbage patch in order to make this synthetic fuel for transportation.

  • @quantumascension2035
    @quantumascension2035 7 месяцев назад +7

    I have been told that India has a lot of trash and feedstock all over their country. My thought is that it may be financially helpful to India and US to be able to utilize and clean up the feedstock areas to create SAF as well as give India a more healthy and cleaner environment and enhance the reduced carbon emissions of airline travel. This could also help the country financially if a deal or contract could be made one that supports all nations and people not just US. I am sure there are other countries which could unite in this amazing new sustainable fuel emissions goal. Just a thought. This should be talked about a lot more. Not just in the US. What are your thoughts?

  • @jackxu02140
    @jackxu02140 10 месяцев назад +24

    How much energy is required to produce a unit of SAF?

    • @iankelley7592
      @iankelley7592 10 месяцев назад +15

      Can't speak to the synthesis of specific biofuels, but for the initial phase - the gasification of carbon waste you can use any fuel source, coal, natural gas, or most likely the synthetic NG produced during gasification. If you use the syn gas produced by the system in the system, you should only need a small amount of start-up fuel before it becomes self-sustaining. Basically instead of all of your substrate being converted into fuel, a certain percentage is used/lost in creating the heat for gasification. The syn gas will be produced regardless of the parameters of gasification so you might as well use it.
      Short answer, it shouldn't require a lot of external energy.

    • @etsequentia6765
      @etsequentia6765 10 месяцев назад +3

      @@iankelley7592 Self sustaining... I like the idea. Efficient.

    • @Neojhun
      @Neojhun 10 месяцев назад

      That's the problem speicifically Fischer-Tropsch Process is energy intensive. Needs mainly lots of heat.

    • @Random19573
      @Random19573 10 месяцев назад

      FT is highly exothermic. The challenges are providing a syngas

  • @CAPHENIA
    @CAPHENIA 4 месяца назад +1

    "Great insights shared in this video! The discussion on "How Jet Fuel Is Made?" was particularly informative and well-presented. As someone deeply involved in the technology and sustainability sectors, I found this content highly relevant and thought-provoking. Keep up the excellent work, and I look forward to more enlightening content in the future. Thank you for sharing."
    "Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is the hero of the aviation industry's sustainability journey, and CAPHENIA's cutting-edge technology is leading the way. CAPHENIA's commitment to innovation in SAF production is setting a remarkable standard for the industry.

  • @Boo-pv4hn
    @Boo-pv4hn 10 месяцев назад +10

    This is something I like to hear! Let’s stop wasting things that could be commodities. They’ve forgotten that there are also options of using animal waste and human waste to replace fuels. This could be huge and also improve our rivers and save money for the people who pay sewage and save a lot for the companies as people and animals dedicate daily

  • @widodoakrom3938
    @widodoakrom3938 5 месяцев назад +1

    Seems like very expensive and also the process making it required LNG as catalyzer in gasification process

  • @jimbernard6112
    @jimbernard6112 8 месяцев назад +4

    Questions:
    1) What powers that huge refinery and all of the heavy equipment used to produce SAF from trash?
    2) When SAF is burned in a turbine engine, what are the products of combustion? In other words, what is coming out of the exhaust if it's not carbon?

    • @CCP_Operative
      @CCP_Operative 8 месяцев назад +1

      1) Fossil fuels and potentially renewables. This process does emit co2
      2) CO2 however it is CO2 that was recently captured from the atmosphere. I.e it was absorbed by the plants that were used to make the SAF
      Overall SAF reduces emissions by 80% depending how it's made. Not completely because like you suggest the refinery and equipment is powered by fossil fuels.

    • @EntonDelMonte
      @EntonDelMonte 8 месяцев назад +2

      Jep that’s the most important question. When the energy invested in the Fischer-Tropsch process is not renewable itself, the SAG is more wasteful than normal fossil fuels.

    • @liammccann5661
      @liammccann5661 6 месяцев назад +2

      It may be possible for some of the feedstock to be burned as fuel for generating the energy needed on site to run the process, thus reducing energy costs. On top of this, there are many sources of feedstock other than trash that can be used as feedstock for SAF, such as dried sewage sludge and agricultural residue and forest debris.

  • @DanCambell
    @DanCambell 2 месяца назад

    the location i work at in NJ is starting construction on SAF production location. @ one of Duponts old facilities

  • @curiositycapturesofficial
    @curiositycapturesofficial 10 месяцев назад +5

    You guys could use the huge amount of trash in the pacific to make fuel. This is a great idea!!

  • @biobossx99
    @biobossx99 10 месяцев назад +6

    Does the SAF math work out? What is the energy input?

    • @pius_xiv
      @pius_xiv 10 месяцев назад +1

      Unlikely to get a clear answer to this question just the same way there’s little discussion about the environmental catastrophe caused by electric car battery production

    • @pius_xiv
      @pius_xiv 10 месяцев назад

      The decrease of centralized pollution in cities, traded off for strip mining the earth using child labor. But it’s ok since we can’t see it. So yes, indeed, the dangers of car batteries.

    • @dannielledoerr4085
      @dannielledoerr4085 2 месяца назад

      Use non condensable gases to help run process

  • @andis9076
    @andis9076 10 месяцев назад +1

    Which company and stock?

  • @treyshaffer
    @treyshaffer 10 месяцев назад

    What are the byproducts of SAF production?

  • @hbarudi
    @hbarudi 10 месяцев назад +3

    This is something I can get behind easily.

  • @billwhite1603
    @billwhite1603 10 месяцев назад +1

    Are they counting electricity to run refinery??

  • @wrigpearchewing
    @wrigpearchewing 10 месяцев назад +20

    In the trash is plastic, a significant amount. Which is produced from oil. So it's still a fossile fuel.

    • @peterfrantellizzi6639
      @peterfrantellizzi6639 10 месяцев назад +6

      That's true but the Scope 3 emissions of the plastic are already baked in, versus pulling new fossil fuels out of the ground

    • @StephenSmith304
      @StephenSmith304 10 месяцев назад +4

      ​​@@peterfrantellizzi6639ure but there's no way this will ever be net zero as they want if this is just a fossil fuel with extra steps. Only if the fuel source is direct air capture fueled by renewables with a full zero emission lifecycle analysis would this even be possible. This idea is just a distraction even if it was possible to scale it up.
      Calling this SAF is misleading at best. More accurately it's reusing existing carbon emissions, but like OP says the reprocessing emissions needs to be taken into account, which makes the whole thing extra dubious.

  • @Mr.Engineer662
    @Mr.Engineer662 10 месяцев назад

    This is great idea for commercialization

  • @laughlot
    @laughlot 10 месяцев назад +1

    So now we know why Doc Brown needed fuel for the Delorean in Back to the Future 2

  • @noe_122
    @noe_122 10 месяцев назад

    Great ad🙂

  • @wades_world22
    @wades_world22 10 месяцев назад +1

    wow - this is incredible, from TRASH to jet fuel

  • @ScaryBunnyMonster
    @ScaryBunnyMonster 10 месяцев назад +4

    Can it melt steel beams?

  • @CommissionerLofi
    @CommissionerLofi 10 месяцев назад

    Nice 👍

  • @guderian6177
    @guderian6177 10 месяцев назад +9

    Cool idea but how do they process the garbage without carbon emissions? Also, how is relying on garbage sustainable? Even US gargantuan stock of garbage would be used up pretty quickly with serious expansion in capacity.

    • @emmy7437
      @emmy7437 10 месяцев назад

      correct me if im wrong but SAF is still fuel so burning it still produces c02 they may reduce trash but it doesn’t solve aviation c02 problem

    • @carholic-sz3qv
      @carholic-sz3qv 10 месяцев назад +4

      Di you even watch the video!? They actually use the carbon from trash plus hydrogen from the splitting of garbage

  • @AngryTango
    @AngryTango 10 месяцев назад +7

    What an incredible ability to innovate solutions to climate change while making good profits.

  • @irenefarmer3840
    @irenefarmer3840 10 месяцев назад +1

    They usually bury these kinds of innovations

  • @maxwalker1159
    @maxwalker1159 10 месяцев назад +1

    Interesting

  • @Fellowtellurian
    @Fellowtellurian 10 месяцев назад +3

    The way you make this happen is to put a price on carbon and then those with high emissions will pay more to decarbonize. The supply issue isn't a supply issue, it is a willingness to pay issue, ie demand from airlines.

    • @Stew0220
      @Stew0220 10 месяцев назад

      Summit Next Gen

  • @ryankratzer5210
    @ryankratzer5210 8 месяцев назад +1

    It’s going to have the same carbon emissions it’s just biodiesel. Honestly probably more carbon emissions because of how much more it’s going to take to manufacture it

  • @LifeUnscriptedPod
    @LifeUnscriptedPod 10 месяцев назад

    Very sustainable

  • @gr8bkset-524
    @gr8bkset-524 10 месяцев назад +6

    We can put a price on carbon equivalent to the damage it does to the planet. This would make fossil fuel prices higher and make SAF more competitive. It would also lower demand for unnecessary flying. Someday, if we survive climate change, we'll look back at this era as when we burned everything up so we can zip around the planet,.

    • @freedomfan3277
      @freedomfan3277 10 месяцев назад

      Carbon doesn't damage the planet it feeds plants.

  • @peter0702
    @peter0702 10 месяцев назад +6

    can someone explain how SAF reduces CO2? Is it just a net reduction, or it fundamentally has more energy per volume?

    • @justincoleman7856
      @justincoleman7856 10 месяцев назад +2

      So according to Skynrg, all SAF does is recycle co2 instead of adding to it. However, all this tech is still in the early stages, so I'm pretty sure that this will become more simplified later on.

    • @zapfanzapfan
      @zapfanzapfan 9 месяцев назад +2

      It's like heating your home with a wood fire instead of using oil or natural gas.

    • @PapaphobiaPictures
      @PapaphobiaPictures 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@Riorozenit's not bookkeeping. It's just that it doesn't ADD any additional CO2 overall to the atmosphere; it doesn't reduce it

    • @PapaphobiaPictures
      @PapaphobiaPictures 7 месяцев назад +1

      If you use fossil fuels, you're adding the additional carbon into the system. SAFs use organic matter (plants) that are comprised of carbon that has already been drawn from the atmosphere, so releasing it back means no additional carbon

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 10 месяцев назад

    I like this video

  • @WolfeSaber9933
    @WolfeSaber9933 10 месяцев назад +7

    And people said trash is trash. Fulcrum has now added another recycling system to the world, helping to battle climate change.

    • @jtwilliams8895
      @jtwilliams8895 10 месяцев назад

      And it turned out that recycling has been a scam. Have you missed those headlines? They’ve been out there for years. Guess what? Human induced Climate change is too

    • @mr.stonerUDX714
      @mr.stonerUDX714 10 месяцев назад

      climate changes lolololollolololololololololololololololololololololo

  • @fdangleshadang-a-lang7149
    @fdangleshadang-a-lang7149 10 месяцев назад +1

    Seems like a win-win to me

  • @alexandrechen3081
    @alexandrechen3081 10 месяцев назад +2

    It will still generate CO2, how does that solve the problem of zero carbon emission?

    • @alexandrechen3081
      @alexandrechen3081 10 месяцев назад +1

      Well it does solve some problems of waste and reduce the consumption in oil reserve that we have. This is positive

    • @calibratedoralogues9546
      @calibratedoralogues9546 10 месяцев назад

      @@alexandrechen3081 so did Charles Sweeney think before.......san, ni, ichi... kaboom !

  • @lokesh303101
    @lokesh303101 10 месяцев назад +14

    I encourage the SAF but need to target the other Industries like Railways.

  • @janklaas6885
    @janklaas6885 10 месяцев назад

    📍5:47

  • @vladimirdoyle3934
    @vladimirdoyle3934 4 месяца назад

    I believe we should shipping in trash from the rest of the world. Plus using biochar plants to extract bio oil and syngas, from agriculture waste and yard waste could help us meet those goals. And producing this state domestic would help lower the cost.

  • @pressurizer1
    @pressurizer1 8 месяцев назад

    Why would you get fuel that's four times more expensive in a period of inflation? SAF: Subsequent Asinine Fuel.

  • @United_Wings
    @United_Wings 10 месяцев назад

    Wow

  • @patrickrcowland2790
    @patrickrcowland2790 10 месяцев назад +16

    Greenwashing for sure, it doesn’t sound as good if the title of the video is “how jet fuel is made from trash and animals”. The fats needed would probably be fuelling already unsustainable or ghastly intense farming practices, adding to their emissions. Any numbers on the expected effect on the farming industry emissions and animal welfare WSJ?

    • @etutorshop
      @etutorshop 10 месяцев назад

      I could be wrong, but I felt like someone is lying threw their teeth. The reason being they say that SAF is going to cost 4 times more than regular fuel and that consumers are looking for cheaper flights and that the airlines are running on a tight budget. If that is the case, I cannot see a clear path on how this would work as companies exist for profit.

    • @Carlos1116
      @Carlos1116 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@etutorshop They basically telling people "We will be using more and more SAF in the future, but we will put up the flight tickets price because of the cost increase"
      They are business and it's always about cost and revenue.

    • @kickassnetwork
      @kickassnetwork 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@etutorshop Easy, it's in the IRA (Inflation Reduction Act). Airlines get tax credit for using SAF to offset the increase cost. While the tax credit doesn't cover all cost. The airline will back it if it's cheap enough (and it seems like the tax credit is high enough) and also it's an investment in alternative supply source for fuel to help absorb shocks in the Oil market (As you may note, kinda frequently recently). SAF should go down in price over time as newer better technology and infrastructure comes out. Oil prices though will probably go up. In the long term, SAF probably makes tons of sense. It would offer a more resistant supply chain and look good PR wise. Prices too should eventually come down.
      The IRA though is kickstarting it by offsetting a lot of the initial cost and price, making new industries and creating the demand earlier than it would otherwise might be commercially viable.

  • @jordy1751
    @jordy1751 7 месяцев назад

    GEVO stock for SAF investing.

  • @kganzon
    @kganzon 10 месяцев назад

    Fuel for the deloreon!

  • @barryj388
    @barryj388 5 месяцев назад

    Basically you'll pay for this through taxes used to subsidized SAF and the government will mandate its use so no airline has a choice in the matter which makes using SAF a non-competitive factor among airlines and then they'll all pass the costs on to the traveler.

  • @fakename8856
    @fakename8856 10 месяцев назад +1

    The problem the HUGE amount of energy needed to make this garbage. It’s garbage. They should ONLY Abe allowed to do this with renewable energy sources. Such a waste of time. It’s just marketing.

  • @patchitdoc
    @patchitdoc 10 месяцев назад

    Mining the Great Pacific Garbage Patch has already started.

  • @aesma2522
    @aesma2522 10 месяцев назад

    Ethanol as produced is far from carbon neutral (nor environmentally neutral). One major feedstock should be hydrogen made from renewable energy/nuclear, and carbon captured from processes that absolutely need it, or better from the air.

  • @byloyuripka9624
    @byloyuripka9624 10 месяцев назад

    title of video: "how jet fuel is made"
    reality of video: "add trash to magic gasification tower which we wont go into any detail on"

  • @justincoleman7856
    @justincoleman7856 10 месяцев назад

    So my only issue with this video is at the very end talking about the IRA (Inflation Reduction Act).

  • @miraibovs2215
    @miraibovs2215 10 месяцев назад +3

    I love the idea that trash has finally found a use, but idk why but I feel like the SAF production plants might be producing more CO2 wastes too producing this

  • @CannabisTechLife
    @CannabisTechLife 10 месяцев назад +1

    Woah woah woah, when did Oscar the Grouch stop sounding grouchy?

  • @mrslinkydragon9910
    @mrslinkydragon9910 10 месяцев назад

    The areas with massive mountains of plastic waste are going to be mined!

  • @Kevin-ur9us
    @Kevin-ur9us 10 месяцев назад +1

    So..... We're taking carbon we put in the ground and instead burning into the air? How is this carbon neutral??

    • @calibratedoralogues9546
      @calibratedoralogues9546 10 месяцев назад

      Shooo, don't make the obvious obvious to the smug & sustainable herd. You will be trashed as conspiratorial fossil fuel.

  • @88corinutza
    @88corinutza 10 месяцев назад +6

    if they can make billions of gallons SURELY we can make a few hundred gallons at home for our cars 😍😍

    • @CHMichael
      @CHMichael 10 месяцев назад

      Need a diesel engine for it.

    • @TheAmericanCatholic
      @TheAmericanCatholic 10 месяцев назад +2

      @@CHMichaeland additives because pure kerosene isn’t ideal for diesels

    • @CHMichael
      @CHMichael 10 месяцев назад

      @@TheAmericanCatholic ideal ... frying oil isn't ideal either... but it works.

  • @marktucker208
    @marktucker208 10 месяцев назад

    This is clearly a good thing BUT it's not really a great solution because it can't be produced at a large enough volume to even touch the sides of plane emissions

  • @HKim0072
    @HKim0072 10 месяцев назад

    So, basically it's the Back to the Future car. Pulling trash out of Marty's trash can.

  • @sisk22
    @sisk22 10 месяцев назад

    We’ve lost our minds.

  • @treefarm3288
    @treefarm3288 6 месяцев назад +1

    Third World countries have a lot of trash, too. Maybe they could benefit by developing trash to SAF themselves.

  • @nickyyyyy
    @nickyyyyy 10 месяцев назад

    How is burning trash sustainable?
    Recycling is sustainable...
    This is stupid.

  • @johnhulet8462
    @johnhulet8462 10 месяцев назад

    Take taxes from the populace to fuel airlines?

  • @ghostmourn
    @ghostmourn 10 месяцев назад +1

    Such a waste of Money - this and all the Hydrogen stations in California that no one ever uses. --- hand outs. Thats all this is

  • @lonemaus562
    @lonemaus562 10 месяцев назад

    Seems like instead of carbon we are putting micro plastic in the air

  • @danielfegley2735
    @danielfegley2735 8 месяцев назад

    Why isn't this done for cars battery will cause pollution when they are buried and the mines are causing problems also plus a 2 hour drive becomes a 4 hour drive because you have to stop and wait to charge

  • @tomast9034
    @tomast9034 4 месяца назад

    there is nothing green on this. it makes just independent from fosil fuels. but still great idea.

  • @santy07bangbang83
    @santy07bangbang83 7 месяцев назад

    Why can't make fuel for cars from garbage?

  • @myhughjorgan
    @myhughjorgan 10 месяцев назад +1

    4:07 10 million gallons is 0.25% of 4 billion gallons, more than 0.1%. Lady can’t come prepared with accurate numbers for an interview but is a top-dog at a large airline!

  • @KarlenBell
    @KarlenBell 10 месяцев назад

    So burning trash in the air, nice

  • @oWispify
    @oWispify 10 месяцев назад

    US needs high speed rail

  • @chiluxr250
    @chiluxr250 10 месяцев назад

    How the heck burning plastic is carbonizing. LOL

  • @abbybonilla4511
    @abbybonilla4511 10 месяцев назад

    As if air travel wasn't expensive already.

  • @kwinter2541
    @kwinter2541 10 месяцев назад

    Now , how to pull it out of the air .

  • @danieljurca2113
    @danieljurca2113 5 месяцев назад

    Everytime I fart I move forward

  • @embededfabrication4482
    @embededfabrication4482 10 месяцев назад

    nobody admits the problem with gasification, you need dry feedstock, there is a lot of work and energy goes into making that nice dry fluffy "garbage" they show in the beginning. It's much easier to make fuel from coal, they've done it in South Africa for a long time, the germans figured it out in the second world war, Fischer Tropsch chemsitry.
    sorry it's a nice idea but it's just a pr ploy

  • @lighttheoryllc4337
    @lighttheoryllc4337 10 месяцев назад +1

    Is Trash made Jet Fuel ⛽️ "SAF" enough? 😅

  • @taipizzalord4463
    @taipizzalord4463 10 месяцев назад +1

    Is this just greenwashing so companies LOOK like they are playing their part but are actually not?

  • @toddhayes3506
    @toddhayes3506 10 месяцев назад +1

    ♻ recycling Great Job United

  • @mattcollins4550
    @mattcollins4550 10 месяцев назад +1

    This is idiotic... first off there is nothing wrong with carbon.
    Secondly, it seems like it costs more energy to produce SAF than yiu get out of it.

    • @calibratedoralogues9546
      @calibratedoralogues9546 10 месяцев назад

      That's exactly where the profit is. That's why kopi luwak is so expensive!

  • @zumabbar
    @zumabbar 2 месяца назад

    let's hope the policies won't end up causing another Cobra effect

  • @GraniteInTheFace
    @GraniteInTheFace 9 месяцев назад

    Bunker fuel is trash too.

  • @entropymaster2012
    @entropymaster2012 10 месяцев назад +4

    If aviation does not work to become more sustainable, with the current explosion in air travel throughout the world it will certainly become a major factor in climate change. Sustainable aircraft fuel has a huge potential especially if it can be made of trash!! ❤

  • @pedrolplgm
    @pedrolplgm 10 месяцев назад +1

    AUTOPSIA.CAUSA MORTIS.OXIDO DE GRAFENO.

  • @andremantovani
    @andremantovani 10 месяцев назад

    hm… “net zero”, right.

  • @j2simpso
    @j2simpso 10 месяцев назад +5

    This is one of the few reasons I continue to fly United regularly is that I can ensure my travel is carbon neutral. To think that flying all the way from London Heathrow to Sydney, Australia (connecting in Los Angeles) was carbon neutral is amazing and means I get to travel more with a clear conscience.

    • @xXAbdulBaqiXx
      @xXAbdulBaqiXx 10 месяцев назад

      SAF is not even 1 percent of their total fuel

    • @zack9912000
      @zack9912000 10 месяцев назад

      lol you are not saving the earth

  • @D-Mny
    @D-Mny 10 месяцев назад +1

    Buzz word of the day…
    Feed stock 🙄

  • @astrowuff
    @astrowuff 10 месяцев назад +2

    It's still turning carbon that's in physical solid form into a liquid fuel that will then be turned into carbon dioxide, thus adding to the greenhouse gases. This doesn't help the environment the way people think it does. carbon dioxide from crude oil or carbon dioxide from trash fuel is the same result.

  • @nathanbanks2354
    @nathanbanks2354 10 месяцев назад +2

    Umm...doesn't this put CO2 into the atmosphere that would otherwise be stored underground?

    • @WolfeSaber9933
      @WolfeSaber9933 10 месяцев назад

      Well, what are the downsides for storing the CO2 in the ground compared to reusing it?

    • @nathanbanks2354
      @nathanbanks2354 10 месяцев назад

      @@WolfeSaber9933 It takes space in the ground and wouldn't help people fly, but it also wouldn't heat the planet up by releasing greenhouse gasses.

    • @WolfeSaber9933
      @WolfeSaber9933 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@nathanbanks2354 There are gases that are worse than CO2 when it comes to greenhouse emissions, like a thousand times worse.

    • @WolfeSaber9933
      @WolfeSaber9933 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@nathanbanks2354 Plus if not careful, trash being buried would contaminate groundwater.

    • @widodoakrom3938
      @widodoakrom3938 5 месяцев назад

      Nope it still produce CO2

  • @CLove-mo7cc
    @CLove-mo7cc 10 месяцев назад

    Ah new man made horrors to keep me up at night. Can't wait to breathe in poison

  • @williamdrijver4141
    @williamdrijver4141 10 месяцев назад +5

    Sounds like typical big company greenwashing....

  • @jarrodyuki7081
    @jarrodyuki7081 10 месяцев назад

    i like germany.

  • @weilrodelys4201
    @weilrodelys4201 10 месяцев назад

    A global trash market maybe?

  • @d.h.601
    @d.h.601 10 месяцев назад

    Absolute malarkey