you should try to undervolt with pbo2 your 5700x3d and undervolt+overclock the 4070 ti super, could get a nice 5% performance with better thermals and lower power consumption depending on how lucky your silicon is
5700x3d was on PBO2 with -30 curver optimizer while the gpu is at stock. Usually i run my gpu undervolted daily but for this benchmark i leave it at stock.
Assuming youre playing on 1440p, expect about 10-15% performance hit depending on games. There is a video showcasing this by Ancient Gameplay, you should check it out. ruclips.net/video/216mM_r4nI4/видео.htmlsi=qGsv1VyYNcInmaxe
@@vaasmontenegro1232yes you can, but idk if u can gain 15% all around since 4070 ti super is already a fast card. I will try to overclock this and post a video
bro u had my config and the upgrade i want, i already upgraded my 5600x to a 5700x3d and my 3070 to a 4070 ti super if cheap on second hand market after 50 series are out or a 5070 ti if its truly worth the $
5070 Ti probably the most compelling choice for 1440p but we'll see the benchmark first. I just hope it would have more vram like 20gb or something. If the difference are only about 15% then im fine with 4070 ti super. Also scalpers gonna go crazy and the prices would go up nonetheless.
Path tracing is actually insane, i thought it will hold well atleast until 2026 and then that game just destroyed it lol. 16GB definitely necessary for 70 series upper class gpu and they didnt even care, here's 12GB 5070 with 4090 Performance with all AI shinenigans. Even when you can run max settings (without RT it consumed around 12GB) it will still be limited by vram, it's gonna be 3070 case all over again.
@@TheMoXyYT yup. create a problem to sell a solution situation because, "no one gonna stop us anyway". the price keep increasing since the gtx 1000 series, and now the 70 ti class is more expensive than then 80 ti class, while still can't play lots of game at 4k because they purposefully make the 4k experience exclusive on a $2000 card because of the vram limitation. at the gtx 1000 series generation, we all thought we would all be playing at 4k anytime soon. But nvidia purposefully make that a distant dream with their bs. the 5070 can easily games at 4k if their claim is right about the MFG, but obv the 12gb vram is where the potential got killed. And they really think they're bringing the future to us 🤣
For the cost, im not gonna bother upgrading to AM5. This build still running 60fps++ at 1440p on the latest games anyway. I'll take the 10% performance hit with DDR4 for cheaper price since i just need to swap gpu and it's good to go. Maybe I'll upgrade when AM6 released though
Amd is always expensive. I got a i5 12600k and z790 motherboard with 6000mhz 32gb ddr5 ram for $290. Cpu is overclocked to 5.2ghz and my 4070ti super is the zotac trinity i have bios flashed to strix oc so power limit is %128 so +284 core +2000 mem. Ik most people dont like intel but definitely better cost efficient wise and performance for certain things. @MoXy69YT
Depends on games, but 5700x3d has very similar fps to 7500f/7600 in avg. If you aren’t upgrading to 7800x3d or 9800x3d, 5700x3d is much cheaper upgrade if you already has AM4 m/b and DDR4 RAM.
5700x3d should be about the same as R5 7500f/7600 for gaming performance. But according to Tom's hardware performance geomean CPU list for 2024 the 5700x3d is more equal to R7 7700x in gaming. So you'd have to go up to a 7800x3d/9800x3d to really get a big upgrade over the 5700x3d in gaming. It would of course depend on the graphics card, game and settings in how big/if any performance difference.
you should try to undervolt with pbo2 your 5700x3d and undervolt+overclock the 4070 ti super, could get a nice 5% performance with better thermals and lower power consumption depending on how lucky your silicon is
5700x3d was on PBO2 with -30 curver optimizer while the gpu is at stock. Usually i run my gpu undervolted daily but for this benchmark i leave it at stock.
Should bios flash to strix oc. I run 3030mhz with +2000 mem at 57 degrees or less.
I plan on getting the same specs but play on a 34 inch monitor ultrawide, what would be the performance cost in fps?
Assuming youre playing on 1440p, expect about 10-15% performance hit depending on games. There is a video showcasing this by Ancient Gameplay, you should check it out.
ruclips.net/video/216mM_r4nI4/видео.htmlsi=qGsv1VyYNcInmaxe
@TheMoXyYT do you think that could be fixed with a overclock? And i aim to buy a factory OC card and gonna do another OC to it
@@vaasmontenegro1232yes you can, but idk if u can gain 15% all around since 4070 ti super is already a fast card. I will try to overclock this and post a video
@@TheMoXyYT Thanks!
Also, do you think u could test far cry 3 and 4 on this? No reviews have been made with this card yet, let alone the same rig
bro u had my config and the upgrade i want, i already upgraded my 5600x to a 5700x3d and my 3070 to a 4070 ti super if cheap on second hand market after 50 series are out or a 5070 ti if its truly worth the $
5070 Ti probably the most compelling choice for 1440p but we'll see the benchmark first. I just hope it would have more vram like 20gb or something. If the difference are only about 15% then im fine with 4070 ti super. Also scalpers gonna go crazy and the prices would go up nonetheless.
@@TheMoXyYT Nop 16 gb
damn indiana jones consume ALL the vram 🤣. and nvidia didn't bother to give us at least 20 gb 5070 ti or 24gb 5080. sigh
Path tracing is actually insane, i thought it will hold well atleast until 2026 and then that game just destroyed it lol. 16GB definitely necessary for 70 series upper class gpu and they didnt even care, here's 12GB 5070 with 4090 Performance with all AI shinenigans. Even when you can run max settings (without RT it consumed around 12GB) it will still be limited by vram, it's gonna be 3070 case all over again.
@@TheMoXyYT yup. create a problem to sell a solution situation because, "no one gonna stop us anyway". the price keep increasing since the gtx 1000 series, and now the 70 ti class is more expensive than then 80 ti class, while still can't play lots of game at 4k because they purposefully make the 4k experience exclusive on a $2000 card because of the vram limitation. at the gtx 1000 series generation, we all thought we would all be playing at 4k anytime soon. But nvidia purposefully make that a distant dream with their bs. the 5070 can easily games at 4k if their claim is right about the MFG, but obv the 12gb vram is where the potential got killed. And they really think they're bringing the future to us 🤣
I recommend you to switch to DDR5 System. There will be at least 15 fps difference. I am using the same system as DDR5.
For the cost, im not gonna bother upgrading to AM5. This build still running 60fps++ at 1440p on the latest games anyway. I'll take the 10% performance hit with DDR4 for cheaper price since i just need to swap gpu and it's good to go. Maybe I'll upgrade when AM6 released though
Amd is always expensive. I got a i5 12600k and z790 motherboard with 6000mhz 32gb ddr5 ram for $290. Cpu is overclocked to 5.2ghz and my 4070ti super is the zotac trinity i have bios flashed to strix oc so power limit is %128 so +284 core +2000 mem. Ik most people dont like intel but definitely better cost efficient wise and performance for certain things. @MoXy69YT
iit's the recording,+overlay it's not the ddr4 with the 5700x3d
Depends on games, but 5700x3d has very similar fps to 7500f/7600 in avg. If you aren’t upgrading to 7800x3d or 9800x3d, 5700x3d is much cheaper upgrade if you already has AM4 m/b and DDR4 RAM.
5700x3d should be about the same as R5 7500f/7600 for gaming performance. But according to Tom's hardware performance geomean CPU list for 2024 the 5700x3d is more equal to R7 7700x in gaming. So you'd have to go up to a 7800x3d/9800x3d to really get a big upgrade over the 5700x3d in gaming. It would of course depend on the graphics card, game and settings in how big/if any performance difference.
can u do fortnit
I don't have and play fortnite at the moment. I'll consider playing it after
pls do
Gtfo this Ryzen