@@MysteryStew5977bc he’s not actually saying anything. He asked why the quality isn’t good and he said it’s bc they can sense ultraviolet light? That makes no sense. If they wanted to not be seen and their tech is advanced that they can sense ultraviolet light but can still be detected. It makes no sense than shit talking Tyson who is a genius is just the nail the coffin
He listed 6 different ways to say thermal imaging, then proceeded to say nothing about why all the videos are in 240p and said we are the crazy ones for basically asking for just a clear photo.
The more a video gets zoomed, the more blur it gets, and people will usually zoom on a video and they'll post that zoomed video, and other people will repost the zoomed video again and agin further lowering the quality
@leonxl You talkin bout “Improversation”? When he says that sometimes he’ll start a sentence and have no idea where he’s going with it, kinda like an improv conversation. Then he puts’em together “an imroversation” lol 😂😂
@supersyaz2871 yo that was me but I legit knew what I needed to do for my part to get us the A😂 most of the time they just wanted me not to do much cause I played too much
He actually proved stevos point more, saying we have all this extra video and radar data but still somehow only get crappy UFO videos lmao. What a moron.
That's the debate 101 if you can't win the argument, change the argument!! I don't know who this guy is but if you can't win the argument or the debate, you deflect and talk about something else. I've never lost a debate in my life, not even in college! All that got me was hated! But it also shows you how ignorant and stupid the average person is! I single-handedly beat my entire class on a debate about pro-life and then the next day they switched it around and gave me pro-choice and I still beat them all by myself and we're talking 31 females!! They wanted to string me up
I used to think he avoids questions too. That ain't it bro! Like me, he gets excited when presented the opportunity to share info, so it's all overwhelming and you skip over certain points and words thinking the other person is catching up, then end up saying something totally off course
I'd rather lose the debate and get pussy over winning a pointless debate and causing literally everyone to hate me... that's definitely a strange flex there my guy...
How did he avoid the question? His answer was the reason why the footage is not in 4K is because these are stealthy crafts that are captured by alternative systems. Not the typical camera lenses that are designed to show images similar to our eyes, including colour etc. That was a direct answer to the question, it took another nobody to spell this out to a bunch of nobody's who think they just proved this guy wrong within 5 seconds lol
In what way did he not answer his question? He answered it in 83 different ways? Steve-O “Why bad camera every time ufo?” Jeremy “Not iPhone camera, ultraviolet, military radar, whatever else he said. Are you dumb or deaf or both?
He’s saying the footage they’re releasing are declassified military footage filmed from thermal optics. They use the white hot/black cold they’re not high res cameras.
@@HookLine48 Thermal cameras utilise the infrared spectrum. That sits between the visible light spectrum and and microwave spectrum (radar). That would suggest that these 'aliens' have mastered the technology to manipulate the visible light spectrum (so they can't be seen on conventional cameras), and have manipulated the microwave spectrum (so they can't be seen on conventional radar), but didn't bother to modify their infrared emission just so some military jet could get a glimpse at some blurry smudge on their screen for a few seconds?
@@TheMightyHamsnot at all, these are also systems filming something thousands of feet if not miles away because everytime we get close enough with high resolution cameras or anything that has those they instantly can go to another location cause they don’t want to be filmed. It’s obvious there’s something in our air space that utilizes technology that we can’t replicate there’s thousands of hours of video evidence as well as testimony from the most reputable people in the world, I’ll take their opinion over yours cause you somehow think our govt (who has whole sections that don’t speak to each other and has more leaks than a faucet) is for some reason and somehow responsible for this technology to distract us from SOMETHING they never tell us what 😂
@@TheMightyHamsWe are extremely close to manipulating the "visible light" spectrum to a good degree, like a sheet of material that bends light so you can't see what's behind it. I'm not saying they exist but they would definitely be able to do it if we can 😂
@@TheMightyHams I can’t explain every single UAP video, I’m referring to the tic tac that Cmd Fravor was witness to. His F18’s FLIR pod filmed it, he saw it with his naked eye along with his wingman, plus the Nimitz recorded radar data on it. Point is the military uses FLIR cameras not high def iPhone cameras. So to answer your question some can be seen with the naked eye and yes can be recorded on radar. Besides there is a possibility that not all UAPS are a result of off world alien tech, some of them could be black budget experimental human made alternate propulsion craft.
But did you not learn alot about Cameras and different types? He's actually very clever this high end camera sponsored shill. I also wanna see the stars like he claimed and then I saw the price of one of those cameras. Now I'm looking at payment plans
For some reason I really don't trust this guy. I've seen him on many shows and something about him rubs me the wrong way. I'm usually really spot on when I don't trust someone immediately. Turns out I'm always right, unfortunately. This guy sends up red flags everytime I hear him speak..
NDT literally came to my high school and told us things weren’t possible. He spoke about time travel mostly because at that time he was working on that at a college.
He did it's not a normal camera picking these things up so it's not going to look high quality. The most expensive high definition camera isn't going to work to see these things.
I think what he is trying to say is some things can’t be picked up by the human eye despite resolution. The NOGs thing is real, I never knew how many stars were in the night sky until I served.
If you're looking at something that's far enough away it's only going to show up on your sensors as a couple of pixels clustered together and if you crop that down to show it on a TV to viewers it's going to look really low resolution. Even if it was the Imaging systems of an F35.
@shawnmccann5277 That still doesn't explain the sheer amount of shit resolution quality videos. Also, NVGs are usually just cameras that interpret other light wavelengths to display a digital image on a screen, so there is still no excuse. Even the Special Edition MW2 NVGs you got in 2009 were able to get half decent usage of it. These reasons said here are shit.
So off. He's saying the blurry pics/video is because the cameras/tech being used can't pickup what the actual "intelligent vehicle" is because it doesn't want you to. He uses multiple different "sensors" and layers all the data to get better "interpretations" For example; cephalopods, an intelligence, can change its skin to not allow a thermal camera to receive it's heat. That's a thing and we have now made a material that can mimic that. Sooo if an advanced civilization has just 10x better tech than that they can make a vehicle that can mask itself to our technology. Y'all should have him learn you something and listen to his advice here at the end 😊
@@southcentrallanews4342 There's an argument that they could be using some sort of material/system that interferes with the visible light spectrum, and that would reduce what a camera would pick up from filming it... But if that was the case then it would only be the UFO that was blurry and everything else would be unchanged. Except we find that every "UFO sighting" was filmed on some 2MP camera in 240p. Also if they had the ability to create materials that were highly refractive or otherwise able to mitigate their visible light emission, then why is it that in every "UFO sighting" video they're blurry but equally at the same time emitting some bright light or weird visual phenomenon? From a logical perspective, if they had that technology and were flying inside the atmosphere then they would stick to being invisible all the time rather than baiting UFO spotters with the occasional light show.
It was a cringe fest when I saw clips of him on Rogan. He's got more than a few screws loose. There's a long winded dumpster full of excuses with everything.
Pay attention to this in people you don’t necessarily trust. If you ask a difficult question and they throw random true facts at you instead of properly answering then they’re trying to avoid the question or look smarter. Steve O asks about why cameras are so blurry and he tells him what infrared and thermal are??
He said it wrong. Military cameras cannot track with too high a magnification or else you will never find the object as the FOV is tiny. The FOV determines the resolution you can realistically use so they went with infrared to easily spot objects by heat and kept the larger FOV hence the lower resolution. For example a telescope is looking not at the night sky but a pinpoint of it and then zooms in.
@@scotch7731 civilian like in cell phones? You have to understand that cell phones have a wide fov to allow you to easily acquire what your trying to film. If you zoom way in the FOV narrows a large degree and then even with phone pointed at target you will have a hard time finding it and when you do the small fov means any tiny degree of movement is magnified so you will get the jumpy video like it was filmed by a person with tourettes. So most cell phones do not zoom in very far and hence the low resolution.
@@Thuggin4Jesushe was absofuckinglutely wrong about the vaccine He is indeed a sellout… Would I do the same thing if I had some waving cash in my face to lie about a vaccine? Probably would, so I don’t blame him, but that doesn’t make him any less of a sellout
True, everyone says they know the real trufe, in fact no one knows shiiiit really. Its easy, we still DONT KNOW WHATS ON THE BOTTOM ON OUER O W N PLANET FFS.. Lol. We bearly kbow like what? 96% is not been lookt in to or whatever it is. But for some how they kbow aloooot of BS about the whooole UNIVERSE juust by looking at satelite and a telescope! Hahaha coooaaan! "Yes we know all about ouer moon cuz we have studding it for manmy years thrue the teleskope 🙃 And got pocs from space ect so it true and real" . But its getting alittle dum.. when they tryied to lying about UFO tech fpr over 80+ years, and when they say its "no evedence of this clam, and no proof of ot really". Try give them the best pic ever of a real UFO, they go "naaah thatd for suuure fake! Or a ballone or astroid." Like get real fffs 😂😂😂😂
To be clear I've NEVER, EVER, EVER EVER EVER,......... Seeen a clear video of a ufo that's not clearly and obviously made in a studio. Can you refrence just ONE, such video kind sir??
I used to love looking through my NVGs in Afghanistan during overnights tower guard shifts because he’s right, the sky is LITERALLY COVERED with nothing but stars. It’s gorgeous ngl. I’d see shooting stars every couple of seconds probably 70+ per minute every hour on the hour. I loved Afghanistan night skies, practically zero light pollution. Nothing like USA skies I swear to you. GORGEOUS
I saw similar in the middle of the desert in the west USA. It's wild and relaxing at the same time. Zero light pollution and yes. Shooting stars. Stars from ground to overhead. It's something EVERYONE should experiemce at least once.
You’re not getting RADAR returns 😂 6 years active duty in the Marine Corps as a RADAR technician. We had to spend a year in school learning about RF energy and how it propagates and how powerful it is. At half power, the radar would drop birds out of the sky instantly killing them from hundreds of feet away. A concentrated beam of RF energy from the ground will fry anything electronic in an airplane thousands of feet in the air. It’s called “burn through.” If you’re “getting radar returns” through NVGs or any camera for that matter, not only is that equipment never going to work again, but you sir are blind, and your brain is melting and you have maybe seconds to live. You may want to learn how powerful RADIATION is before claiming you’re nonchalantly peeping it like some Apple Vision Pro
@@FructozeProductionsSun have Power output on ground level about 1000W/m2 so every 1m*1m there is 1kW of energy with wide freq range....GSM tower even 5G is only 10W/m2 maximum....so when your go out in sunny weather than this is 10 time worse....i know, there is infra light, UV A,UV B, visible spectrum ,and sub milimmeters waves, and all another waves.... something is catch by magnetosphere of Earth( dangerous ionising radiation)...GSM is only from about 800-3500MHz so non ionising radiation...true is that non of radiation is good for us in long term,but 1 km from GSM tower isnyour phone múch more dangerous than tower....look about how radiation power decreases exponentially with distance and what is 0dB and what means when your have -90dB on signal input....ask chatgpt or Gemini (Bard)
NDT pipes in with the argument that if there were actual UAP craft buzzing around our skies we would have so much footage as everyone has a cell phone. The argument against this is that cell phones are a consumer product made to video tap your friends standing 10 to 20feet away from you. Your British aka the people who invented physics and I am a Puerto Rican and I have to school you on this....what is going on in old sunny England mate?!
@@dealwolfstriked272 “Searching For Superman” was shot on an iPhone and won an Oscar. Just throwing that out there. Either way big ups for putting that Britbong in his place. Puerto Rico is basically the 51st state so like the rest of America we just keep dunking on these limeys.
@@kamtroy2527that dude will vote for trump for sure. He'll probably want to fax his vote in like your dumb ass 😂😂😂😂but that's a trump supporter. All of y'all should only vote on truth social that way you know the count is correct.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I saw a UFO when I was 9 on Halloween in 1991 in Rex Ga. The description of what i saw is exactly what was described by Bob Lazar on Joe Rogans podcast. Thats the first time i heard someone describe what i saw 100%. Disc shape, streak of light when moving, moved instantly and stopped instantly. Breathed blue light/fog.
The UFO that I saw was completely different. It was a black cube that was quite silent. It continued getting closer and closer and asit did i noticed that as it appeared like a black cube from further away it had pointy sides. But no blue fog. No silvery disc. No streak of light
If anyone has a cellphone that can take a fully zoomed in picture in the dark of a far away object that doesn’t look like shit, then you have better tech than the aliens themselves 😂lol
I'm not saying I believe this guy. But the reason it sounds like a bunch of, mumbo-jumbo to you. Is because you lack the intelligence to comprehend his message.
That is not how NVG’s work, they amplify the ambient light, so you can see it with the naked eye. You just have to be in an area without to much light. Same way the will get washed out if you look at a source of light, they also won’t work in total darkness because the amplify available light. They will pick up on small amounts of infrared light but not much into the spectrum. Much like the dull red light your remote control emits will look much different through NVG’s. Different spectrums are seen using other optics, thermals are not the same as NVG’s it’s a different device and works off of different spectrums.
I was driving to work one day and was looking out into the mountains. It was a clear sunny sky so everything was nice. I noticed a blue lighting bolt in the middle of the air almost touching a tall pine tree. It was literally in the middle of the air wiggling like a worm , it would wiggle super fast then slowly like a parasite in a piece of meat. It looked like the air was about to crack open like concrete It lasted for at least 3 or 4 seconds. Idk if what i saw is normal but i Never had a chance to pull out a phone or pull over to get a better look at it. Strange things happen out of no where so saying why nobody has clear footage of something strange is crazy.
@@dinom3106 think about it these things come as a surprise. Just like an animal running across the street while you where driving. And people who have CCTV are pointed at a specific direction. And if you're actually looking to catch something on video you'll have to get lucky
Exactly Steve O. It's ALWAYS blurry, crappy. Everybody has hyper good camera's now in theirs back pocket, bit never ever somebody comes up with REAL clear footage. Always vague, blurry.
Candid camera is a good indicator of being genuine. That's why a good deal of the sightings are bad quality. It's sudden. You can also suggest the low quality dimishies the doctoring
Anyone noticed how he didn't answer the question and deflected? Also, all those technologies he mentions have far better resolution than those videos. He is full of $#it.
I don't agree with you because, he did answer the question. The very fact that you cannot simply see this phenomenon with the naked eye means that it will have to be through some of these technologies which in turn cause a lower resolution than just filming with say an iphone. If you don't agreeor think im stupid fine, but thats how I interpreted it.
I got a basic question,,, why do UFO s have "marker lamps" so you can easily see them??. They have noiseless crafts that defy gravity but they have to have external lightes?
Basically he's saying that the UFOs have the technology to scramble cameras. Not just phone cameras, but several different types of camera. It's a cool theory. Same concept in the movie Nope. The alien has the ability of an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and can kill anything electrical.
That not only didn't answer the question but was totally irrelevant. The question was why every video of "aliens" is so low quality you could have a paper mache alien look 100% legit.
Try film a plane with your normal camera lens, then zoom in to try show it and thats why it looks like its on a potato. If its in the day you can shoot video 60fps iso 50 and 180 shutter. That's detailed at night its 30fos iso 3200+ and a 360 shutter, that's slow frame rate, pushed to the max lens sensitivity so its grainy and 360 shutter makes everything blurry.. Its because phones dont have 300mm lenses on them and ISOs of 10,000+
@@evzevz06 Cool, care to explain why aliens are traveling to Earth using machines that would have to cost trillions, to make a trip even more worth money and a lot of time, to do cool sky shows for the primitive peoples?
@@davidirvine3066 they are looking for gold for their dying planet , or waiting for a specific moment in time that we all move on the same frequency to come and get us
FUN FACT ABOUT RADIATION: At certain volumes, radiation can distribute a magnetic disturbance which causes a cameras picture quality to gain a grainy and out of focus reaction. We are starting to realize that it isn't the person but the craft itself emitting tiny particles that the camera can quickly pick up but won't be to much effective towards humans. You may have radiation for like 24hrs but you'll probably feel like your sick but next day your feeling better.
There it is... Even if it's not alien.. and it's our own drones or uap or UFO... Radiation disrupts the magnetic field our phones or cameras or sensors emit..
@@girthyyobo1554what he said is partly true genius, radiation does affect cameras and causes them to get a grainy and static image. Everything else is bs
To further this as you increase magnification the FOV must decrease. So if a cell phone would be able to capture a distant object in 4K you would have a mess of a time actually finding the object in the sky as the higher the magnification the more pin point the size its viewing becomes. You will be flailing the cell phone around and not being able to catch the object and if you do your hand will make tiny erratic movements and you will constantly lose track.
@@Sunnoski I am rather surprised Jeremy does not bring up the military cameras being blurry cause they are engineered this way. We have nothing on earth that can track a super fast object while zooming in very far but its being worked on with the Galileo project. Obtain High-resolution, Multi-detector UAP Images, Discover their Nature: A picture is worth a thousand words. For example, a megapixel image of the surface of a human-scale UAP object at a distance of a mile will allow to distinguish the label: “Made in Country X” from the potential alternative “Made by ETC Y” on a nearby exoplanet in our galaxy. This goal will be accomplished by searching for UAP with a network of mid-sized, high-resolution telescopes and detector arrays with suitable cameras and computer systems, distributed in select locations. The data will be open to the public and the scientific analysis will be transparent. We anticipate extensive Artificial Intelligence/Deep Learning (AI/DL) and algorithmic approaches to differentiate atmospheric phenomena from birds, balloons, commercial or consumer drones, and from potential technological objects of terrestrial or other origin surveying our planet, such as satellites. For the purpose of high contrast imaging, each telescope will be part of a detector array of orthogonal and complementary capabilities from radar, Doppler radar and high-resolution synthetic aperture radar to high-resolution, large camera visible range and infrared band telescopes. If an ETC is discovered to be surveying Earth using UAP, then we have to assume that the ETC has mastered passive radar, optical and infrared technologies. In such a case, our systematic study of such detected UAP will be enhanced by means of high-performance, integrated and multi-wavelength detector arrays.
@@BlackguynamedMason I explained this in another post.Military cameras are engineered for wide FOV as the wider the area looked at the easier scanning of a treeline is and instead were engineered to use thermal black hot white hot etc. Zoom in really far to read writing on an object is not needed in combat scenario.
This is scientifically accurate. Seeing the moon through binoculars and training my telescope to the same spot takes IISAs, scientific term (incremental infinitely small adjustments)
The reason why is bc baked potatoes and the microwave effect causing a grainy film bc the sound of the radiation makes it noisy and dehydrates the moisture in and around atoms of the air particles leaving a dusty looking after affect as if you put sand on a black sheet of paper and the heat of the radiation causes moisture to heat and expand quicker causing dry particles to intertwine into a compound mixture like mixing concrete eventually solidifying with heating and cooling rapidly and drying and wetting rapidly which in term also causes the focus to gravitate towards the grains rapidly forming and disappearing.
@@mission_crit if you were smart enough you would have corrected me when I said affect....short for affection...the proper word would have been effect. Either way it just a joke.
The problem here I the lack of understanding of active and passive systems. Passive systems give off no signatures whereas active systems do. There’s no way you’re detecting a signature of a camera capturing light.
So why every video of Bigfoot looks like it was shot with the same camera that they used for the Patterson footage u telling me Bigfoot and distort the new iPhone camera
@@barryhebert5839 He's being facetious because you didn't use punctuation to separate your sentences. I could read it with a bit of extra thought but he has a point about making your sentence readable man. Periods and commas are sufficient, nothing advanced.
Cell phones were developed to NOT zoom in very high or else you get the complaints of WHY CANT ANYONE HOLD THE DAM CAMERA STILL!!! This happens when you zoom in further the movements get exaggerated as the fov narrows. You want higher and higher magnification give me X1000 I am smart and can use this and then your friends will call you and idiot cause you cant film the alien standing 50ft away from you.
This is the second comment that has similar thoughts. He did answer the question. You just aren't able to understand it. The public school system in the United States has done a bang-up job for a lot of these so-called adults roaming around.
@@timbodnar6711 comments section here mostly have the same sentiments as me. And, I'm not American. America has the lowest standard of education. Just look at your schools, colleges and universities.
@@timbodnar6711this guy has no idea what he’s talking about. I know this because I study physics. He is clueless just blurting smart words to sound smart. If you know about the concepts he mentions, you would know that he is completely full of shit
He doesn’t. Some things he says are correct but we just assume he’s an expert cause he has a phd. But he’s never personally been to space and seen these things. He’s not an astronaut.
I’ve videotaped UFOs but my camera sucks at night zoom photos . Im a little more skeptical though so I have my flightradar running if I ever see a moving light in the sky as well as satellite locations
To the point of the question at hand, "Why does it look like it was filmed on a potato?" Well. There's two reasons. Firstly. When you film something from a distance, it is not going to be as clear as it would be if you filmed it up close. Second. When you film something at night, and you can test this at home, you get a lot of grains in your image due to the low light sensors trying to make up for it. Hence the lesson here. Cameras don't do so well from a distance or at night. For that, you need special camera equipment and it ranges from 10s of 1000s to 100s of 1000s of dollars. Not everyone is running around with a $30,000 camera in their hands. Not yet, at least. So, simple answer to a simple question. You're welcome.
Thank you! As someone was once a photographer (I got paid to take pictures), it’s a lot harder to get clear shots at night and at a distance than most people realize.
Except all those videos from the military using advanced equipment. My buddy has tons of video from his time in Afghanistan. He was on the side of a mountain zooming in on a city. Crystal clear. Yet anything of an alien is trash quality.
he explains how limited our eyes are by not seeing all these spectrums of light AND THEN says what he films isn't picking up what he's seeing in person ps we're never, ever, ever going to encounter extraterrestrial intelligent life. the universe is too big. they exist and we will never meet.
Well if you believe science then you believe the universe is infinitely expanding, that means the possibility of anything is possible. How would we know the laws of our part of the universe apply to another?
They’re more likely trans-dimensional beings, or have the ability to warp space time if they are real, so the universe being big makes 0 difference if we will meet them or not lol
He did what everyone like him dose and talked in a circle and avoided giving any actual evidence to anything legit just crap out his own face no words came out
I took my i-phone 12-pro max and filmed the night sky in the middle of the jungle. The colors of the planets and stars were sparkling like you CAN see in telescopes. I was blown away.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
The more this guy talks, the less I believe him.
@@MysteryStew5977 everything
Yup
@@MysteryStew5977a lot of it tinfoil hat man
@@MysteryStew5977bc he’s not actually saying anything. He asked why the quality isn’t good and he said it’s bc they can sense ultraviolet light? That makes no sense. If they wanted to not be seen and their tech is advanced that they can sense ultraviolet light but can still be detected. It makes no sense than shit talking Tyson who is a genius is just the nail the coffin
He's the one that's talking and not thinking
He listed 6 different ways to say thermal imaging, then proceeded to say nothing about why all the videos are in 240p and said we are the crazy ones for basically asking for just a clear photo.
I was looking for a comment that picked up on the thermal comments lol, bro said heat 3 different ways
Had to through the oh the NVGs yeah I'm super smart oh you're dumb that's night vision goggles for you peasants
The clip is edited tf
@@papas_lapas it's shortened not edited to make him say something he didn't
The more a video gets zoomed, the more blur it gets, and people will usually zoom on a video and they'll post that zoomed video, and other people will repost the zoomed video again and agin further lowering the quality
Jeremy’s way of speaking reminds me of Michael Scott when he just keeps going and derailing his own conversation LOL
@leonxl You talkin bout “Improversation”? When he says that sometimes he’ll start a sentence and have no idea where he’s going with it, kinda like an improv conversation. Then he puts’em together “an imroversation” lol 😂😂
He even Looks like him😂
This is actually what Michael scott did when he moved to Colorado, chase aliens lmao
He's like the dude in group assignments who didn't do shit and just talked to cover it up.
I despised those people. 😂
@supersyaz2871 yo that was me but I legit knew what I needed to do for my part to get us the A😂 most of the time they just wanted me not to do much cause I played too much
@@alexandercarvajal7125 not gonna lie but sometimes i was that guy too. 😂
Literally one of the guys that's been doing this for years. You sound slow, like what have you got? Nothing. Thought so.
Perfect characterisation of NDT
SteveO "Why does it look like every ufo video is filmed on a baked potato?"
Dude "well let me tell you how night vision works."
you dont need nightvision to see "aliens". my iphone 11 can catch an alien in the air lmao
Why go after Neil?
Cause he's a joke, that is bought and paid for.
He actually proved stevos point more, saying we have all this extra video and radar data but still somehow only get crappy UFO videos lmao. What a moron.
@@shridathmorrison855because he's a douche that tries to over complicate everyone
"I need science to start backing what I'm saying instead of debunking it" is basically what I heard at the end of the video.
Every time this guy was on JRE i couldnt stand him. Avoids questions left and right and proceeds to spew garbage redirecting the actual question.
That's the debate 101 if you can't win the argument, change the argument!! I don't know who this guy is but if you can't win the argument or the debate, you deflect and talk about something else. I've never lost a debate in my life, not even in college! All that got me was hated! But it also shows you how ignorant and stupid the average person is! I single-handedly beat my entire class on a debate about pro-life and then the next day they switched it around and gave me pro-choice and I still beat them all by myself and we're talking 31 females!! They wanted to string me up
I used to think he avoids questions too. That ain't it bro! Like me, he gets excited when presented the opportunity to share info, so it's all overwhelming and you skip over certain points and words thinking the other person is catching up, then end up saying something totally off course
@@BrianEthridge-wg6kothey probably was tired of hearing you talk fr...I only read a paragraph and can see why you suck
I'd rather lose the debate and get pussy over winning a pointless debate and causing literally everyone to hate me... that's definitely a strange flex there my guy...
How did he avoid the question? His answer was the reason why the footage is not in 4K is because these are stealthy crafts that are captured by alternative systems. Not the typical camera lenses that are designed to show images similar to our eyes, including colour etc. That was a direct answer to the question, it took another nobody to spell this out to a bunch of nobody's who think they just proved this guy wrong within 5 seconds lol
Sir, this is a Wendy's.
Sir this is a mental institute you don’t work at Wendy’s anymore
Didn’t Wendy’s serve baked potatoes? Do they still serve them?
Wendy's nuts smacks you across the face
Politicians should take notes on this guys question avoiding abilities
In what way did he not answer his question? He answered it in 83 different ways?
Steve-O “Why bad camera every time ufo?”
Jeremy “Not iPhone camera, ultraviolet, military radar, whatever else he said.
Are you dumb or deaf or both?
This guy is a baked potato😂😂😂
Hey, I get it, this guy is a moron... but that's offensive to baked potatoes.
He is delicious and buttery?
Baked with weed?😂😂😂
I hope you mean steveo. He's the best potato
@@stevenboddy4232the guy trying to sell you something every 5 seconds
This dude is just naming off technologies he's heard of while not answering the question, then goes after neil?? Lol
He’s saying the footage they’re releasing are declassified military footage filmed from thermal optics. They use the white hot/black cold they’re not high res cameras.
@@HookLine48 Thermal cameras utilise the infrared spectrum. That sits between the visible light spectrum and and microwave spectrum (radar). That would suggest that these 'aliens' have mastered the technology to manipulate the visible light spectrum (so they can't be seen on conventional cameras), and have manipulated the microwave spectrum (so they can't be seen on conventional radar), but didn't bother to modify their infrared emission just so some military jet could get a glimpse at some blurry smudge on their screen for a few seconds?
@@TheMightyHamsnot at all, these are also systems filming something thousands of feet if not miles away because everytime we get close enough with high resolution cameras or anything that has those they instantly can go to another location cause they don’t want to be filmed. It’s obvious there’s something in our air space that utilizes technology that we can’t replicate there’s thousands of hours of video evidence as well as testimony from the most reputable people in the world, I’ll take their opinion over yours cause you somehow think our govt (who has whole sections that don’t speak to each other and has more leaks than a faucet) is for some reason and somehow responsible for this technology to distract us from SOMETHING they never tell us what 😂
@@TheMightyHamsWe are extremely close to manipulating the "visible light" spectrum to a good degree, like a sheet of material that bends light so you can't see what's behind it. I'm not saying they exist but they would definitely be able to do it if we can 😂
@@TheMightyHams I can’t explain every single UAP video, I’m referring to the tic tac that Cmd Fravor was witness to. His F18’s FLIR pod filmed it, he saw it with his naked eye along with his wingman, plus the Nimitz recorded radar data on it.
Point is the military uses FLIR cameras not high def iPhone cameras.
So to answer your question some can be seen with the naked eye and yes can be recorded on radar.
Besides there is a possibility that not all UAPS are a result of off world alien tech, some of them could be black budget experimental human made alternate propulsion craft.
Two pictures/videos that are ALWAYS blurry:
Bigfoot and aliens
Well Bigfoot is blurry. That’s just common knowledge
Love that he avoided the question entirely 😂😂😂
But did you not learn alot about Cameras and different types? He's actually very clever this high end camera sponsored shill. I also wanna see the stars like he claimed and then I saw the price of one of those cameras. Now I'm looking at payment plans
He answered the question. The aliens can distort your recording. They are aware when being recorded.
@@phillybarbee yeah, because it's way better to worsen the camera quality instead of completely blocking it, or not letting others see you
The crafts move fast and use the distortion in space to move. It's very hard to get a clear image.
For some reason I really don't trust this guy. I've seen him on many shows and something about him rubs me the wrong way. I'm usually really spot on when I don't trust someone immediately. Turns out I'm always right, unfortunately. This guy sends up red flags everytime I hear him speak..
Aliens are gay
Aren't we all
I don't like putting chemicals in the water that turn the frickin' aliens gay
Hmph... alien bussy 🤤
Slaylien
make them lame and gay
NDT literally came to my high school and told us things weren’t possible. He spoke about time travel mostly because at that time he was working on that at a college.
Because Bigfoot is blurry.
There’s a large out of focus monster roaming the countryside
@@samvega290😂😂😂
That is extra scarry to me.
@@samvega290I use to watch those videos. I still do , but I use to too
Who knows what to believe anymore! Discernment is a must!
I like the part where he answered Steve-O's question
He did answer the question you dim wit. How can you not understand? Sensor layers on military cameras.....what do you expect?
He did it's not a normal camera picking these things up so it's not going to look high quality. The most expensive high definition camera isn't going to work to see these things.
He did though. Perfectly actually.
@@MissJellybean He literally didn't
He did du,bass
That was the most passionate sounding off topic BS of a response to a question ive ever heard. Pretty much sums up the entire subject nicely.
My cat thinks my laser pointer is alive.
I shine it under the couch and then click it OFF really fast, so he thinks it's hiding under the couch.. like it lives down there. 😂
@@DeenanTheKemon1your cat hates you😂
@@DeenanTheKemon1is
@@DeenanTheKemon1😂
Dude is fluent in yappanese
Fluent AI
What did he say that is wrong?
He didnt address the question.
He's clickbait. We're clickbits. @@mamupelu565
@@TheAngryAtheistHe did. If you & half the population of this RUclips short would open your ears.
You can even see ghosts with those glasses.😮 👀🔴
This is my car mechanic talking bad about my other mechanic.
Real talk from a former auto tech, most of them suck
Hysterical 😂
This balloons and he knows it but its his job to bullshit us.
Lmfao
No it’s like a guy who plays with model cars talking shit about an auto mechanic
Lame excuses. The fact is that higher resolution means you can either see it's clearly not aliens or it's easier to tell apart the CGI.
I think what he is trying to say is some things can’t be picked up by the human eye despite resolution.
The NOGs thing is real, I never knew how many stars were in the night sky until I served.
If you're looking at something that's far enough away it's only going to show up on your sensors as a couple of pixels clustered together and if you crop that down to show it on a TV to viewers it's going to look really low resolution. Even if it was the Imaging systems of an F35.
@shawnmccann5277 That still doesn't explain the sheer amount of shit resolution quality videos. Also, NVGs are usually just cameras that interpret other light wavelengths to display a digital image on a screen, so there is still no excuse. Even the Special Edition MW2 NVGs you got in 2009 were able to get half decent usage of it.
These reasons said here are shit.
So off. He's saying the blurry pics/video is because the cameras/tech being used can't pickup what the actual "intelligent vehicle" is because it doesn't want you to. He uses multiple different "sensors" and layers all the data to get better "interpretations"
For example; cephalopods, an intelligence, can change its skin to not allow a thermal camera to receive it's heat. That's a thing and we have now made a material that can mimic that. Sooo if an advanced civilization has just 10x better tech than that they can make a vehicle that can mask itself to our technology. Y'all should have him learn you something and listen to his advice here at the end 😊
@@southcentrallanews4342 There's an argument that they could be using some sort of material/system that interferes with the visible light spectrum, and that would reduce what a camera would pick up from filming it... But if that was the case then it would only be the UFO that was blurry and everything else would be unchanged. Except we find that every "UFO sighting" was filmed on some 2MP camera in 240p.
Also if they had the ability to create materials that were highly refractive or otherwise able to mitigate their visible light emission, then why is it that in every "UFO sighting" video they're blurry but equally at the same time emitting some bright light or weird visual phenomenon? From a logical perspective, if they had that technology and were flying inside the atmosphere then they would stick to being invisible all the time rather than baiting UFO spotters with the occasional light show.
Ndt needs to think and stop talking!!!!! I love it!!! Saying what we all need to hear!!!!
The longest question dodge ive ever heard
This guy would make a good politician, completely missed the point of the question and gave a literate response with scientific buzzwords
Yeah if you’re telling Neil degrasse Tyson to start thinking you need to re-evaluate your whole life😂
Neil thinks there's more than two genders... So ya... Neil needs to start thinking.
Neil Degrasse Tyson said there are infinite genders. The guy is compromised
It’s a night and day difference hearing the two talk. I could listen to Neil degrasse Tyson for hours, this guy is insufferable.
This just proves if you speak with confidence and conviction you can Bullsht your way through literally anything
That's the whole Republican party in a nutshell
@@Loktoris cringe
None of his bullshit is really getting through
Except bro is not getting away with this one😂
New age snake oil salesmen😂😂😂
Someone said...
There's nothing wrong with the phones, the UFOs are just blurry 😂
Mitch hedberg said that about bigfoot
When u record a car going fast u won't see it clearly 😂 wym
🤣😂🤣😂
I couldn't go longer than 2 seconds with this guy.
It was a cringe fest when I saw clips of him on Rogan. He's got more than a few screws loose. There's a long winded dumpster full of excuses with everything.
The guy is nuts!
He's playing to the trump crowd 😂
In your butt?
your dumb comment aint funny no mo fool. get with the cool crowd and on the trump train. @@PaulBrown-uj5le
Pay attention to this in people you don’t necessarily trust. If you ask a difficult question and they throw random true facts at you instead of properly answering then they’re trying to avoid the question or look smarter. Steve O asks about why cameras are so blurry and he tells him what infrared and thermal are??
He said it wrong. Military cameras cannot track with too high a magnification or else you will never find the object as the FOV is tiny. The FOV determines the resolution you can realistically use so they went with infrared to easily spot objects by heat and kept the larger FOV hence the lower resolution. For example a telescope is looking not at the night sky but a pinpoint of it and then zooms in.
@@dealwolfstriked272bro that's got nothing to do with why regular, not infrared, footage of aliens is always blurry.
Stop
@@dealwolfstriked272 What about civilian reports of UFOs? Why are they also in terrible quality all the time?
@@scotch7731 civilian like in cell phones? You have to understand that cell phones have a wide fov to allow you to easily acquire what your trying to film. If you zoom way in the FOV narrows a large degree and then even with phone pointed at target you will have a hard time finding it and when you do the small fov means any tiny degree of movement is magnified so you will get the jumpy video like it was filmed by a person with tourettes. So most cell phones do not zoom in very far and hence the low resolution.
Easier to trick people into falling for the viral video they are trying to make @scotch7731
Your gonna look at all those stars and tell me not 1 star has a planet in a zone where life grows
Dude sounds like a dad explaining how Santa never gets seen 😂😂
Homie said that the most famous astro physicist that he need to get to thinking
Degrasse is gay
Isn't neil is a sell out though? Seems like he has no problem being dishonest
Neil is wrong about a lot of things though
@@Thuggin4Jesushe was absofuckinglutely wrong about the vaccine
He is indeed a sellout…
Would I do the same thing if I had some waving cash in my face to lie about a vaccine?
Probably would, so I don’t blame him, but that doesn’t make him any less of a sellout
True, everyone says they know the real trufe, in fact no one knows shiiiit really. Its easy, we still DONT KNOW WHATS ON THE BOTTOM ON OUER O W N PLANET FFS.. Lol. We bearly kbow like what? 96% is not been lookt in to or whatever it is. But for some how they kbow aloooot of BS about the whooole UNIVERSE juust by looking at satelite and a telescope! Hahaha coooaaan! "Yes we know all about ouer moon cuz we have studding it for manmy years thrue the teleskope 🙃 And got pocs from space ect so it true and real" . But its getting alittle dum.. when they tryied to lying about UFO tech fpr over 80+ years, and when they say its "no evedence of this clam, and no proof of ot really". Try give them the best pic ever of a real UFO, they go "naaah thatd for suuure fake! Or a ballone or astroid." Like get real fffs 😂😂😂😂
Degrassi is a CIA debunker & a TOOOOOOL!
To be fair anytime I’ve seen clear footage people automatically say it’s cgi. So there’s no winning.
*To be fair, every clear video I've seen WAS CGI*
To be clear I've NEVER, EVER, EVER EVER EVER,......... Seeen a clear video of a ufo that's not clearly and obviously made in a studio. Can you refrence just ONE, such video kind sir??
That's the point, to keep everyone confused.
@@ThomasTooMuch619facts
Thats true didnt think of it that way
I used to love looking through my NVGs in Afghanistan during overnights tower guard shifts because he’s right, the sky is LITERALLY COVERED with nothing but stars. It’s gorgeous ngl. I’d see shooting stars every couple of seconds probably 70+ per minute every hour on the hour. I loved Afghanistan night skies, practically zero light pollution. Nothing like USA skies I swear to you. GORGEOUS
I saw similar in the middle of the desert in the west USA. It's wild and relaxing at the same time. Zero light pollution and yes. Shooting stars. Stars from ground to overhead. It's something EVERYONE should experiemce at least once.
I used to live in Arizona, you get far enough away from major cities and you can see that without goggles.
Love these topics 👌
Two people are in this room, and Steve-O is the smart one.
It's blurry because it's easier to photoshop aliens into it
These guys are recording demons flying around having a good time 😂
Jeremy "Trust me Bro" Corbell
He has the evidence he just isn’t allowed to show it to you.
It takes someone special to make stevo seem like the most brilliant man in the room 😂
You’re not getting RADAR returns 😂
6 years active duty in the Marine Corps as a RADAR technician. We had to spend a year in school learning about RF energy and how it propagates and how powerful it is. At half power, the radar would drop birds out of the sky instantly killing them from hundreds of feet away. A concentrated beam of RF energy from the ground will fry anything electronic in an airplane thousands of feet in the air. It’s called “burn through.”
If you’re “getting radar returns” through NVGs or any camera for that matter, not only is that equipment never going to work again, but you sir are blind, and your brain is melting and you have maybe seconds to live.
You may want to learn how powerful RADIATION is before claiming you’re nonchalantly peeping it like some Apple Vision Pro
So would you say the radiation emitted from cell phone towers is dangerous and unhealthy to live nearby, let's say a 1 mile radius?
@@FructozeProductionsat ground-level, no.
@@FructozeProductionsI don’t think that would be considered concentrated
Different kind of radiation
@@FructozeProductionsSun have Power output on ground level about 1000W/m2 so every 1m*1m there is 1kW of energy with wide freq range....GSM tower even 5G is only 10W/m2 maximum....so when your go out in sunny weather than this is 10 time worse....i know, there is infra light, UV A,UV B, visible spectrum ,and sub milimmeters waves, and all another waves.... something is catch by magnetosphere of Earth( dangerous ionising radiation)...GSM is only from about 800-3500MHz so non ionising radiation...true is that non of radiation is good for us in long term,but 1 km from GSM tower isnyour phone múch more dangerous than tower....look about how radiation power decreases exponentially with distance and what is 0dB and what means when your have -90dB on signal input....ask chatgpt or Gemini (Bard)
“Neil degGrasse Tyson needs to start thinking 🤔”… …. …. …. ……………. 🤦🏻♂️
NDT pipes in with the argument that if there were actual UAP craft buzzing around our skies we would have so much footage as everyone has a cell phone. The argument against this is that cell phones are a consumer product made to video tap your friends standing 10 to 20feet away from you. Your British aka the people who invented physics and I am a Puerto Rican and I have to school you on this....what is going on in old sunny England mate?!
@@dealwolfstriked272 “Searching For Superman” was shot on an iPhone and won an Oscar. Just throwing that out there. Either way big ups for putting that Britbong in his place. Puerto Rico is basically the 51st state so like the rest of America we just keep dunking on these limeys.
Neil is a narcissist who loves talking and is a liberal puppet
@@dealwolfstriked272Puerto Rico? More line Porto Broko 😂🎉
@@nahrindavid4671 yeah we dont know much but we will keep trying and who knows in 200years it might be Puerto Rico 2.0
😂How do these channels survive? Im in the wrong business. 😂
Remember kids, he can vote...
Imagine voting on a dominion voting machine and thinking votes matter 😆
@@kamtroy2527that dude will vote for trump for sure. He'll probably want to fax his vote in like your dumb ass 😂😂😂😂but that's a trump supporter. All of y'all should only vote on truth social that way you know the count is correct.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Remember kids, everyone is as stupid as this guy in some way. Voting is going to burn the world down.
Delusional Andy
@PLUMBUSCHUNGUS6000 💯
Galiens
Why is nobody getting clearer videoe of ufos?
"I have night vision goggle so thats a false argument"
I saw a UFO when I was 9 on Halloween in 1991 in Rex Ga.
The description of what i saw is exactly what was described by Bob Lazar on Joe Rogans podcast. Thats the first time i heard someone describe what i saw 100%.
Disc shape, streak of light when moving, moved instantly and stopped instantly. Breathed blue light/fog.
The UFO that I saw was completely different. It was a black cube that was quite silent. It continued getting closer and closer and asit did i noticed that as it appeared like a black cube from further away it had pointy sides. But no blue fog. No silvery disc. No streak of light
When Steve-O makes more sense you know you're losing
People act like everyone is rich and able to afford high quality phone camera
If anyone has a cellphone that can take a fully zoomed in picture in the dark of a far away object that doesn’t look like shit, then you have better tech than the aliens themselves 😂lol
Sounds like a bunch of mumbo jumbo trash to me
"I don't understand those words, they must be nonsense!" 😂
@@mane0nethey are infact nonsense tho
He's so passionate about something that people just made up to troll.
I'm not saying I believe this guy. But the reason it sounds like a bunch of, mumbo-jumbo to you. Is because you lack the intelligence to comprehend his message.
@@mane0nethat is exactly what I keep seeing. Goons that can't understand a message. Therefore It must be bs.
That is not how NVG’s work, they amplify the ambient light, so you can see it with the naked eye. You just have to be in an area without to much light. Same way the will get washed out if you look at a source of light, they also won’t work in total darkness because the amplify available light. They will pick up on small amounts of infrared light but not much into the spectrum. Much like the dull red light your remote control emits will look much different through NVG’s. Different spectrums are seen using other optics, thermals are not the same as NVG’s it’s a different device and works off of different spectrums.
"Your not seeing what im saying your seeing, your seeing what your seeing"
*You’re
@MrJoshg210 good job pal. Gold star
@@Shrimplypipples anytime brotha 😁
@MrJoshg210 *brother
@@Shrimplypipples the difference is mine was intentional, yours was ignorance.
I was driving to work one day and was looking out into the mountains. It was a clear sunny sky so everything was nice. I noticed a blue lighting bolt in the middle of the air almost touching a tall pine tree. It was literally in the middle of the air wiggling like a worm , it would wiggle super fast then slowly like a parasite in a piece of meat. It looked like the air was about to crack open like concrete It lasted for at least 3 or 4 seconds. Idk if what i saw is normal but i Never had a chance to pull out a phone or pull over to get a better look at it. Strange things happen out of no where so saying why nobody has clear footage of something strange is crazy.
Not crazy crazy, sure things happen quickly but I would expect more footages and clearer cos... Dash cams, CCTV etc
@@dinom3106 think about it these things come as a surprise. Just like an animal running across the street while you where driving. And people who have CCTV are pointed at a specific direction. And if you're actually looking to catch something on video you'll have to get lucky
Exactly Steve O. It's ALWAYS blurry, crappy. Everybody has hyper good camera's now in theirs back pocket, bit never ever somebody comes up with REAL clear footage. Always vague, blurry.
Candid camera is a good indicator of being genuine. That's why a good deal of the sightings are bad quality. It's sudden. You can also suggest the low quality dimishies the doctoring
Anyone noticed how he didn't answer the question and deflected?
Also, all those technologies he mentions have far better resolution than those videos. He is full of $#it.
I don't agree with you because, he did answer the question. The very fact that you cannot simply see this phenomenon with the naked eye means that it will have to be through some of these technologies which in turn cause a lower resolution than just filming with say an iphone. If you don't agreeor think im stupid fine, but thats how I interpreted it.
Some kind of non-answer right there.
Every politician blushed
Yeah he definitely doesn’t answer the question of why all videos look like shit
I got a basic question,,, why do UFO s have "marker lamps" so you can easily see them??.
They have noiseless crafts that defy gravity but they have to have external lightes?
Not even Fox Mulder would believe that…
Basically he's saying that the UFOs have the technology to scramble cameras. Not just phone cameras, but several different types of camera. It's a cool theory. Same concept in the movie Nope. The alien has the ability of an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and can kill anything electrical.
Right so instead they hit the potato camera lens distortion button 😂 give me a break
@@BlackguynamedMason Yep, you're ignorant.
@BlackguynamedMason cus that would be so much more difficult than controlling gravity 🙄
They guy just said they know our tech..
So why don't the aliens know about night vision, infrared ?🙄😔🫣🤔🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@adet5458erm they did but that was version 2.0 innit? And it's now.....? Exactly! 2.024
Bout time man I been talking about this for 5 years please tell them how bright the white and blue light is around the world
That not only didn't answer the question but was totally irrelevant. The question was why every video of "aliens" is so low quality you could have a paper mache alien look 100% legit.
Try film a plane with your normal camera lens, then zoom in to try show it and thats why it looks like its on a potato. If its in the day you can shoot video 60fps iso 50 and 180 shutter. That's detailed at night its 30fos iso 3200+ and a 360 shutter, that's slow frame rate, pushed to the max lens sensitivity so its grainy and 360 shutter makes everything blurry..
Its because phones dont have 300mm lenses on them and ISOs of 10,000+
@@evzevz06 Cool, care to explain why aliens are traveling to Earth using machines that would have to cost trillions, to make a trip even more worth money and a lot of time, to do cool sky shows for the primitive peoples?
That’s unfortunately what they are.. sky shows for the primitive
@@davidirvine3066 they are looking for gold for their dying planet , or waiting for a specific moment in time that we all move on the same frequency to come and get us
@@WillDynamitebeats I asked for an explanation, not a confirmation.
FUN FACT ABOUT RADIATION: At certain volumes, radiation can distribute a magnetic disturbance which causes a cameras picture quality to gain a grainy and out of focus reaction. We are starting to realize that it isn't the person but the craft itself emitting tiny particles that the camera can quickly pick up but won't be to much effective towards humans. You may have radiation for like 24hrs but you'll probably feel like your sick but next day your feeling better.
There it is... Even if it's not alien.. and it's our own drones or uap or UFO... Radiation disrupts the magnetic field our phones or cameras or sensors emit..
“FUN FACT ABOUT RADIATION:” proceeds to spew utter bullshit that you’ve just completely made up.
@@girthyyobo1554what he said is partly true genius, radiation does affect cameras and causes them to get a grainy and static image. Everything else is bs
@@nnnovacaineee obviously I was talking about the Alien bullshit
@@girthyyobo1554u gotta be a idiot to not realize radiation effect technology😂 just look at the elephant foot photo that was taken. Lmfao
😂😂😂so the aliens be like hell no you aint gonna capture me in 4k. But we can settle on 480p😂😂😂😂😂
To further this as you increase magnification the FOV must decrease. So if a cell phone would be able to capture a distant object in 4K you would have a mess of a time actually finding the object in the sky as the higher the magnification the more pin point the size its viewing becomes. You will be flailing the cell phone around and not being able to catch the object and if you do your hand will make tiny erratic movements and you will constantly lose track.
Jeremy would sure have loved to have you by his side when being asked this question.
@@Sunnoski I am rather surprised Jeremy does not bring up the military cameras being blurry cause they are engineered this way. We have nothing on earth that can track a super fast object while zooming in very far but its being worked on with the Galileo project.
Obtain High-resolution, Multi-detector UAP Images, Discover their Nature:
A picture is worth a thousand words. For example, a megapixel image of the surface of a human-scale UAP object at a distance of a mile will allow to distinguish the label: “Made in Country X” from the potential alternative “Made by ETC Y” on a nearby exoplanet in our galaxy. This goal will be accomplished by searching for UAP with a network of mid-sized, high-resolution telescopes and detector arrays with suitable cameras and computer systems, distributed in select locations. The data will be open to the public and the scientific analysis will be transparent.
We anticipate extensive Artificial Intelligence/Deep Learning (AI/DL) and algorithmic approaches to differentiate atmospheric phenomena from birds, balloons, commercial or consumer drones, and from potential technological objects of terrestrial or other origin surveying our planet, such as satellites. For the purpose of high contrast imaging, each telescope will be part of a detector array of orthogonal and complementary capabilities from radar, Doppler radar and high-resolution synthetic aperture radar to high-resolution, large camera visible range and infrared band telescopes. If an ETC is discovered to be surveying Earth using UAP, then we have to assume that the ETC has mastered passive radar, optical and infrared technologies. In such a case, our systematic study of such detected UAP will be enhanced by means of high-performance, integrated and multi-wavelength detector arrays.
Meanwhile phone cameras have better footage than the high tech cameras 😂
@@BlackguynamedMason I explained this in another post.Military cameras are engineered for wide FOV as the wider the area looked at the easier scanning of a treeline is and instead were engineered to use thermal black hot white hot etc. Zoom in really far to read writing on an object is not needed in combat scenario.
This is scientifically accurate. Seeing the moon through binoculars and training my telescope to the same spot takes IISAs, scientific term (incremental infinitely small adjustments)
The reason why is bc baked potatoes and the microwave effect causing a grainy film bc the sound of the radiation makes it noisy and dehydrates the moisture in and around atoms of the air particles leaving a dusty looking after affect as if you put sand on a black sheet of paper and the heat of the radiation causes moisture to heat and expand quicker causing dry particles to intertwine into a compound mixture like mixing concrete eventually solidifying with heating and cooling rapidly and drying and wetting rapidly which in term also causes the focus to gravitate towards the grains rapidly forming and disappearing.
Bro has a PhD in bullshitology
Seems logical…
Either you're completely making shit up, or you're just bad at explaining things.
How do you dry atoms when you need multiple to make water? LMAO
@@mission_crit if you were smart enough you would have corrected me when I said affect....short for affection...the proper word would have been effect. Either way it just a joke.
The problem here I the lack of understanding of active and passive systems.
Passive systems give off no signatures whereas active systems do.
There’s no way you’re detecting a signature of a camera capturing light.
So why every video of Bigfoot looks like it was shot with the same camera that they used for the Patterson footage u telling me Bigfoot and distort the new iPhone camera
No
If you learn proper English people will take you more seriously.
@@cullenbohannon1408 what is it you don’t understand
@@barryhebert5839 He's being facetious because you didn't use punctuation to separate your sentences. I could read it with a bit of extra thought but he has a point about making your sentence readable man. Periods and commas are sufficient, nothing advanced.
Cell phones were developed to NOT zoom in very high or else you get the complaints of WHY CANT ANYONE HOLD THE DAM CAMERA STILL!!! This happens when you zoom in further the movements get exaggerated as the fov narrows. You want higher and higher magnification give me X1000 I am smart and can use this and then your friends will call you and idiot cause you cant film the alien standing 50ft away from you.
He went from speculation as to why, to assumption as to why, to "fact" as to why in under 30 seconds. That's wild.
Funny how we were talking about this at work today and now it’s on my phone 🤔
Said so much and still said nothing. Useless.
This is the second comment that has similar thoughts. He did answer the question. You just aren't able to understand it. The public school system in the United States has done a bang-up job for a lot of these so-called adults roaming around.
@@timbodnar6711 comments section here mostly have the same sentiments as me. And, I'm not American. America has the lowest standard of education. Just look at your schools, colleges and universities.
@@timbodnar6711this guy has no idea what he’s talking about. I know this because I study physics. He is clueless just blurting smart words to sound smart. If you know about the concepts he mentions, you would know that he is completely full of shit
@timbodnar6711 so what was the answer??????????
@@timbodnar6711still waiting
Dr. Neil degrasse Tyson*. I’m sure the guy with a phd in astrophysics is not thinking.
He doesn’t. Some things he says are correct but we just assume he’s an expert cause he has a phd. But he’s never personally been to space and seen these things. He’s not an astronaut.
That’s the thing you guys think he’s smart because of a degree and if you think a degree makes you smart your lost
I’ve videotaped UFOs but my camera sucks at night zoom photos . Im a little more skeptical though so I have my flightradar running if I ever see a moving light in the sky as well as satellite locations
To the point of the question at hand, "Why does it look like it was filmed on a potato?" Well. There's two reasons. Firstly. When you film something from a distance, it is not going to be as clear as it would be if you filmed it up close. Second. When you film something at night, and you can test this at home, you get a lot of grains in your image due to the low light sensors trying to make up for it. Hence the lesson here. Cameras don't do so well from a distance or at night. For that, you need special camera equipment and it ranges from 10s of 1000s to 100s of 1000s of dollars. Not everyone is running around with a $30,000 camera in their hands. Not yet, at least. So, simple answer to a simple question. You're welcome.
Thank you! As someone was once a photographer (I got paid to take pictures), it’s a lot harder to get clear shots at night and at a distance than most people realize.
Except all those videos from the military using advanced equipment. My buddy has tons of video from his time in Afghanistan. He was on the side of a mountain zooming in on a city. Crystal clear. Yet anything of an alien is trash quality.
For a normal photographer, yes. For a professional in science no. He just doesn't have them. So there's that lol
Ding ding ding
Have you seen night mode on the newer Samsung phones . It should catch anything that's there really
Sounds like a guy reading a script from the powers that be who control the media. Or H3H3 explaining why sonthing is wrong and his take is better.
This dude literally Explains exactly why we SHOULD have quality UFO video lol
he explains how limited our eyes are by not seeing all these spectrums of light AND THEN says what he films isn't picking up what he's seeing in person
ps we're never, ever, ever going to encounter extraterrestrial intelligent life. the universe is too big. they exist and we will never meet.
Well if you believe science then you believe the universe is infinitely expanding, that means the possibility of anything is possible. How would we know the laws of our part of the universe apply to another?
They’re more likely trans-dimensional beings, or have the ability to warp space time if they are real, so the universe being big makes 0 difference if we will meet them or not lol
@@robertgowenlock1606 I assume they know exactly where to go because of magic, as well?
If they are intelligent enough for space travel, they are intelligent enough to camouflage or distort the video. 🤦♂️
Ufos and aliens are demonic! Jesus saves!
This dude would be the perfect politician
I never saw someone avoiding a question with giving an answer but not giving an answer😂
The end is brutal 🤣
Your eye CAN pick the stars in the night sky, you just need to get away from city lights 😂😂😂😂
Can the uap's blur your camera pics while filming a UAP? It would make sense if they don't want to be filmed
Mfs want aliens to be real so bad 🤦🏽♂️😂😂
He did what everyone like him dose and talked in a circle and avoided giving any actual evidence to anything legit just crap out his own face no words came out
Fun Fact routers & modems are equipped with sonars that can detect people in it's radius.
I took my i-phone 12-pro max and filmed the night sky in the middle of the jungle. The colors of the planets and stars were sparkling like you CAN see in telescopes. I was blown away.
Corridor crew debunks those videos
The best way to understand is to first acknowledge the fact that the universe is way too big for us to be alone, there has to be life somewhere else.
None of what he said explains resolution. Infra red can be shot in as high as 1080. So why the 240?
Man night vision goggles 😂😂😂
Did he really try and stall out Neil Tyson😂😂😂😂
It’s hard to photograph or video a ufo. For one thing, it’s moving and sometimes it’s far away and the iPhone can’t focus on it.
He completely avoided the question.
We can see a license plate from space, but we can't record a person robbing a 7-11 from 6 feet away....
He's absolutely right.
Body Slam to Eats the Grass Tyson * lol * ⚡🔥