Four BEST USSR lenses ever made. TESTED!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 июл 2024
  • My selection of 4 best lenses based on my 8 years experience dealing with those.
    I'm professional lens seller/repairer, please visit my eBay/ETSY stores for checked and serviced vintage german/russian foto equipment at:
    www.ebay.com/usr/kosbik84
    www.ebay.com/usr/retrofotohouse
    www.etsy.com/shop/RetroFotoHouse
    Mir-24M full review- • MC MIR-24M 2/35mm rare...
    Jupiter-9 full review- • Jupiter-9 2/85mm lens....
    Tair-11A full review- • Tair-11 series. Compre...
    00:00 - General information
    01:17 - MIR-24M: description
    02:18 - MIR-24M: photo and video samples
    03:04 - ZENITAR-M: description
    04:02 - ZENITAR-M: photo samples
    04:48 - Jupiter-9: description
    05:23 - Jupiter-9: photo and video samples
    05:57 - TAIR-11A: description
    06:42 - TAIR-11A: photo and video samples
    07:04 - Summarizing
    07:21 - Comparative fotos with same model

Комментарии • 84

  • @RetroFotoHouse
    @RetroFotoHouse  3 года назад +3

    JUPITER-9 m42 mount available here www.ebay.com/itm/325783549190
    Jupiter-9 varnished body, Nikon F mount www.ebay.com/itm/325776962903
    Jupiter-9 early silver, Nikon F mount www.ebay.com/itm/225749119337

  • @antoniolukinidi5195
    @antoniolukinidi5195 3 месяца назад +3

    Спасибо. Отличная работа. И отличный вкус на красоту, в том числе, музыкальную.

  • @vladislavsvetlitsnoi5475
    @vladislavsvetlitsnoi5475 4 месяца назад +7

    Tair-11A 135/2.8 is really nice, same as Mir-24M 35/2. Jupiter-9 85/2 is not so good as for me (too soft), Helios 40-2 85/1.5 is much better in the same focal. Also great are Helios 77M-4 50/1.8 and Kaleinar-5H 100/2.8 MC. Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 MC is also pretty interesting. For telephoto is cool Jupiter-21A 200/4. Have all of them. Just small tip for USSR lens enthusiasts - look for export models, where lens name in English transcription and "Made In USSR" marked. They are usually better in build and image quality. And just FYI, first 2 digits of serial is year of lens production (i.e. 822160 = 1982)

    • @erikschlicksbier
      @erikschlicksbier 11 дней назад +1

      It‘s probably a problem with your copy of the Jupiter 9 though. Mine is tack sharp, even on GFX sensors …

  • @shakerson
    @shakerson 3 года назад +13

    Me: "It's 2am, I should sleep"
    Also me (who is not buying lenses for my SLR or even using my SLR recently): I need to watch this video on Soviet camera lenses.

  • @TheoDahlemPickups
    @TheoDahlemPickups 2 года назад +3

    Your wife is a real beauty to photograph. All the best to you guys from Germany

  • @CookedLight
    @CookedLight 2 года назад +1

    Superb review 🤘🏻

  • @jacquesnel8384
    @jacquesnel8384 Год назад +1

    Great video ! Love from South Africa 🇿🇦

  • @tbrown2892
    @tbrown2892 3 года назад +1

    Great video. Very useful! 🙏🏻

  • @trueblack6760
    @trueblack6760 3 года назад +2

    この方のEtsyのサイトからレンズを購入しました。
    Fマウント改造で、大変綺麗に仕事をしていました。無限遠が調整できてたし。
    こんな動画見たら、また買いたいww

  • @reptilespantoso
    @reptilespantoso 3 года назад +1

    Thank you!

  • @vintage_lenses9878
    @vintage_lenses9878 3 года назад

    Thank you. Love your videos 👌👌👌

  • @av8bvma513
    @av8bvma513 2 года назад +4

    What a beautiful voice!

  • @ohjajohh
    @ohjajohh 3 года назад

    Oh this is great! I want them all!

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 года назад

      Hello! I have them all
      please contact me via my FB page: fb.com/retrofotohouse

  • @OttoLP
    @OttoLP 3 года назад +2

    Great video!

  • @woody5410
    @woody5410 3 года назад +1

    Recently acquired Jupiter 9 N8002449 which appears to be manufactured at a similar time and place to the Jupiter 9 featured in your most interesting and illuminating video. You say "image quality is simply stunning if you have a good copy" how do rate the 'vintage' of the Jupiter 9 you feature in your video?

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 года назад

      Sorry, i didn't quite catch what you mean. I have a video explaining all versions of jupiter-9 in details. Please watch it following a link in this video description

  • @lattesweden
    @lattesweden 2 года назад

    Nice video, thanks! How does the Mir 24 stand vs the Mir 1? I know it is 37 mm f2.8 so a little different on both focal length and aperture, but I mean how the optical quality and rendering compares between the two? Thanks and best regards from Sweden!

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  2 года назад +1

      mir-24 is high quality and fast lens made in very limited quantities in the mid 80thies, while mir-1 is a mass product with lower optical and build quality

    • @lesnytropiciel
      @lesnytropiciel Год назад

      I got one mir 24 with Nikon F mount. Made in Arsenal factory in Kiev 1989. Fantastic lens 👍

  • @MichaelKaykov
    @MichaelKaykov Год назад +1

    Plus any of the LOMO OKS lenses (most were made for Super-35 which is now APS-C)

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  Год назад

      oks is completely another story. I'm talking here about photographic lenses. LOMO are filmmaking beasts.

  • @hanskamies
    @hanskamies Год назад +1

    Hello! I just bought zenit TTL with 1979 production year. It came with Helios 44M 1979 year. TAIR 11A 1979 produced. 3 filters orginal leatherpouch and even with orginal factory certification with stamps, also userguide. Orginal one. Last, there was also 1979 produced helios 28mm lens. All in mint condition. Hard storage case. Its olympic version. I think this was good deal for 150 euros.

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  Год назад

      helios was never produced in 28mm, but mir-10a. If we talk about USSR lenses.

  • @sszzrr1
    @sszzrr1 2 года назад +4

    My USSR(not Russia Fed or Ukraine) choices for 135 are Industar-61L/Z, Jupiter-37A,Zenitar-M and APO-Zenitar-M 135/2.8. Helios-44m6 / m7 and zenitar-m 50/2 are also very good lenses but they came out too late.

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  2 года назад

      industar 61 l/z is not 135mm, but 50mm, same is zenitar-m

  • @adanafilm
    @adanafilm 3 года назад +4

    i have all of four and jupiter-9 has more character than all other.

  • @tobybirney2676
    @tobybirney2676 Год назад

    With all of the different coatings and eras of manufacture, do you still recommend these 4 lenses as a collection for set of cinematography lenses?

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  Год назад

      well, they are not color matched, that's the point to consider. Especially 35mm won't fit the set

  • @1956jude
    @1956jude 2 года назад

    Thanks for the reviews. I am shopping for a vintage lens to specifically shoot B&W on a Sony APS-C camera. Would you have a recommendation? Thanks. 😊

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  2 года назад +2

      Try jupiter-8 50mm F2. It is awesome lens for black and white and street photography

    • @sergeyvaveikov8107
      @sergeyvaveikov8107 2 года назад

      @@RetroFotoHouse только не чёрный...

  • @sebastiang7183
    @sebastiang7183 11 месяцев назад

    You said the Zenitar has a sonnar style bokeh. I thought this lens was a double gauss design?

  • @viniciusgotosleep
    @viniciusgotosleep 2 года назад

    What about the Kaneinar 5N? I'd honestly take a good copy of it over a jupiter 9

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  2 года назад

      Kaleinar was in production in Arsenal plant and it was the worse quality production facility in USSR. In my point of view jupiter-9 is by far better, though sometimes you can get a copy not sharp at vide open

  • @arthurmermelshtein1767
    @arthurmermelshtein1767 3 года назад +4

    Very cool.Well done.
    I have 3 of those 4.
    The Mir is ridiculously expensive for some reason, you can buy a much better lens like the Jena Flektogon for 1/3rd of the price.shame.

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 года назад +1

      Well, it can be found for $200 on eBay, what flektogon can you find for $70?

    • @arthurmermelshtein1767
      @arthurmermelshtein1767 3 года назад +1

      @@RetroFotoHouse The ones I see the cost is aroud 320$+,
      The Flektogon f2.8 can be found around 80-120$.
      Many vintage lenses are too expensive nowdays and aren't a good choice anymore
      ( I bought my Flektogon 35mm f2.4 for 35$, that is not possible anymore).

  • @seoulrydr
    @seoulrydr 2 года назад

    very interested in the mir-24m in m42 if you ever get your hands on one

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  Год назад

      it is rare lens, difficut to get. However you can look up on ebay to see the actual deals

  • @denisrandomtech5822
    @denisrandomtech5822 3 года назад

    What about Helios 40 and 44-2? Mir 24 looks very good too!

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 года назад

      helios 40 is difficult to handle. it is big and heavy. One needs to get used to him prior obtaining good fotos. Helios 44-2 is not of my preference, though it is good lens.

  • @dedskin1
    @dedskin1 2 года назад +2

    Tair 3 all the way :) yeah its 300mm but , that is one of best built lenses ive ever seen , and picture quality is almost APO level , almost

  • @user-pm9mg8vn5i
    @user-pm9mg8vn5i 3 года назад +1

    What will better work with macro jewelry photography using macro rings? Thanks

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 года назад

      Try Industar 61 L/Z MC 50mm F2.8 and you'll not be disappointed

    • @user-pm9mg8vn5i
      @user-pm9mg8vn5i 3 года назад

      @@RetroFotoHouse ty

    • @user-pm9mg8vn5i
      @user-pm9mg8vn5i 3 года назад

      @@RetroFotoHouse I have Nikon D3300, as you said in your review this lens will focus only for 1 meter. In that cast what would you recommend buy this lens or better something else for this camera?

    • @oakleycundall
      @oakleycundall 3 года назад

      You could try the 35mm but then buying an adapter that allows you to mount the lens to the camera back to front. Tge wider the focal length the more macro

    • @jameswburke
      @jameswburke 3 года назад

      I used focus stacking for jewellery shots. Must be on a good tripod & use timer if possible.

  • @checkeredflagfilms
    @checkeredflagfilms 2 месяца назад

    I have a Sony A7iii. What adapter do you recommend?

  • @eduardolarrea4426
    @eduardolarrea4426 2 года назад

    HI...!!! May be you can help me with your opinion...
    My new RICOH SINGLEX II cannot complete the shutter cycle as the mirror is stopped shortly before reaching the bumper but only when the lens is mounted.
    It is an AUTO RIKENON 1:2 50mm - M42.
    In this lens, the cam that operates the diaphragm sticks out 3.7 mm (5/32") and is capable of closing fully at f/16 with a force of less than 80 grams (2.8 oz) leaving only 2 mm (3/32") sticking out. Pushing it all the way down requires increasing force to just under 250 grams (8.8 oz) with nothing to do (All according to my chinese SF-400 digital scale). It seems that this final effort is too much for the mechanics of the camera.
    250 grams seems like a lot. What do you think?
    It's my first M42.
    Thanks and see you soon.

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  2 года назад +1

      i know everything about russian and german lenses, not japan ones, sorry

    • @eduardolarrea4426
      @eduardolarrea4426 2 года назад

      Thanks for answering, @@RetroFotoHouse !
      Excuse me for my unclear question earlier.
      I know of your expertise in Russian and German lenses. My intention was to ask you if those values that I measured in my Japanese lens and I indicated in my previous comment are approximate to those of the lenses that you know so well, such as HELIOS-44, PENTACON auto, PANCOLAR auto, ZENITAR-M, etc., with the same system and are compatible with my camera.
      So: Are those values consistent or similar to those of the lenses known to you?
      Thanks.

  • @Rainsmen
    @Rainsmen 9 месяцев назад

    Юпитер 37 , будет видео ?

  • @thurthevintagelens
    @thurthevintagelens 3 года назад

    what does the term enlighten mean on some of the lenses I have purchased from you.

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 года назад

      Enlightened optics. Single coated glass. Contrary to MC-multicoated.

    • @thurthevintagelens
      @thurthevintagelens 3 года назад

      @@RetroFotoHouse thank you sir.

  • @dionisissyr4171
    @dionisissyr4171 3 года назад +1

    Mir 24 seems very good!

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  3 года назад

      yes, it is

    • @lesnytropiciel
      @lesnytropiciel Год назад

      Yes i got one made in Kiev Arsenal factory. Fantastic sharp colors 35mm f2.0. worth every penny

  • @bikeandsee1647
    @bikeandsee1647 Год назад

    Hi, what is the difference between mir 24M and mir 24H ?

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  Год назад

      mir-24m is higher quality and m42 mount, mir-24h is lower quality and nikon f mount

  • @Ni5ei
    @Ni5ei 11 месяцев назад

    Why can Mir 24M only focus to 0.3 meters while Mir 24N can focus to 0.24 meters?

  • @damianocamicia534
    @damianocamicia534 11 месяцев назад

    Is the Mir 24 far better than the 1B?

    • @SovietLensReviews
      @SovietLensReviews 6 месяцев назад

      Yes, it's much better! The Mir-1V (B) was mass-manufactured, lower quality. The Mir-24M is on another level.

  • @adsertheblade
    @adsertheblade 2 года назад +1

    No Helios 44?

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  2 года назад +1

      in the 50-60mm focal lens category zenitar-m is faster and sharper and higher quality build than helios 44-2. After-it is a matter of taste

  • @DOMOVOISU
    @DOMOVOISU 2 года назад +5

    Good health. Dear friend, the lenses you have presented do not belong to Russian optics. All the presented optical masterpieces were made in the USSR. Be kind.

  • @serhiy1237
    @serhiy1237 2 года назад

    Доброго здоров`я!)) Цікаво і унікально - те чого не вистачає у оглядах про радянську оптику. Дуже багато суб'єктиву _старців_ і мало об'єктивної інформації і тестів з оглядкою на досвід сучасної оптики. Бачу що працюєте над English, розвиваєте бренд закордоном. Треба треба)) Не кажіть, будь ласка, exhaustive review: це означає виснажливий, щоб там онлайн перекладачі не писали. А Ви робите comprehensive reviews. Ну і фото Ви робили same _female_ (і яка взагалі різниця?) model . Feminine - це жіночність, як властивість. До речі в Україні Ви продаєте на olx, чи маєте якісь інакші лендінги?

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  2 года назад

      Thank you for your input :) Much appreciated) Well, here is definition: exhaustive-examining, including, or considering all elements or aspects; fully comprehensive. and after all that comes consumptive ;) Considering Feminine- i need to agree) female is much better word

    • @serhiy1237
      @serhiy1237 2 года назад

      @@RetroFotoHouse , oh, didn’t want to be cheesy at all. I really dig your channel, and quite glad to see some blue-yellow stuff behind;-). A question remains: can I somehow purchase some of the optics in Ukraine without eBay hook?

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  2 года назад

      yes, it is possible. Please contact me via my fb page at fb.com/retrofotohouse. I sell serviced and high quality stuff to customers of mainly western part of the world. So if my prices do not make you scary, of course we can make a deal ;-)

  • @RandomLifeProductions
    @RandomLifeProductions 2 года назад

    Your links do not work

    • @RetroFotoHouse
      @RetroFotoHouse  2 года назад

      that set was sold out....
      please visit my ebay store for some other cool stuff
      ebay.com/usr/kosbik84

  • @flyfishingkindarocks9844
    @flyfishingkindarocks9844 Год назад

    Jupiter 37A and 37AM are far better than Tair 11 by my experience.

  • @tobimaru5899
    @tobimaru5899 Год назад

    mir 24m - manufactured at the Arsenal plant, Kyiv, Ukraine.
    so not all the lenses are Russian.

  • @andrii_312
    @andrii_312 2 дня назад

    friend, you are very wrong to call these lenses russian, when they were made in the soviet union, as evidenced by the inscriptions on the lenses themselves, so don't mislead your viewers about this

  • @igor839
    @igor839 7 месяцев назад

    Что? По Русски заподло было озвучить? Твой ломанный англицкая мова звучит дико.