Just like Evoto, wifi internet dependent, HUGE mistake. Keeps me from using it when and where I want, I frequently process in places where there is no wifi like a relaxing cabin by the lake. Portrait Pro 24 is the best, and no wifi needed. Plus I have a collection of AI Presets that using the computer power and they are just fine. Another Skylum product that is not going to be used by many photographers, plus like Evoto, it teaches laziness, not to know your camera controls or picture processing.
Not worth it for many reasons. The first one is the time it takes to process on almost each step and change, even just when zooming in. It's not a time saver as we could imagine. Second reason is that it easily brings that "AI fake touch" in results and a digital "plastic" appearance, by creating weird textures and color spots, flat zones, etc. I was expecting something higher in quality (that other AI softwares nowadays have). Too expensive, and not that helpful for beauty retouching professionals, maybe for photographers that have no retouching skills, and for "basic and fast" retouching.
@willsimpsonphoto I hope so, because the base is not bad at all. What I really like for example in Aperty is that you can bring back texture by working on fine, medium and coarse details, and it is working very good with impressive result. For many other things I have found better at the moment but AI development goes so fast that for sure they will make it better and better with Aperty. I think it needs few updates that will come progressively with users feedbacks and requests, then it will really worth the cost, and more if they keep this annual payment system (that is a plus when many other companies ask for much more in a pay per use). When it will be fully adapted to a professional use and results, as soon as they can fix the process time for a faster use, Aperty will become totally complementary and "a need" to be included into a professional retouching process.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Do you have a favorite feature or something you’d like to see in Aperty?
인물 보정에 필요한 주름 제거 기능(이마주름.눈가주름.팔자주름.목주름)/
데모 버젼에서는 이미지 처리 스킨 기능과 내보내기 속도가 너무 느림 (pc사양은 좋은 상태)/
결함 제거와 스킨 스무딩등
각 기능 보정 강도의 변화 차이가 너무 약하다.
Congratulations to you and your wife on the wonderful arrival of your beautiful baby girl.❤
@@Jude2408 thank you!!
Is there or will there be a dodge and burn feature?
@@johnmangomedia I hope so. I’ll mention it to them
Don't spend your money. Extremely basic version on release compared to Evoto .......long way to go chaps!!
definitely long way to go, but what i like right now is the lifetime price. not a monthly price yet. thats a big sell for me
Just like Evoto, wifi internet dependent, HUGE mistake. Keeps me from using it when and where I want, I frequently process in places where there is no wifi like a relaxing cabin by the lake. Portrait Pro 24 is the best, and no wifi needed. Plus I have a collection of AI Presets that using the computer power and they are just fine. Another Skylum product that is not going to be used by many photographers, plus like Evoto, it teaches laziness, not to know your camera controls or picture processing.
@@crollinsphoto it would definitely be nice to be able to do this without internet connection. That would be great!
$250 a year No not worth it. LR has retouching features and is getting better all the time with no extra cost to me.
@@jezmink agreed, but I think it’s $250 total for lifetime.
@@willsimpsonphoto 평생 250 달러보다도 한번에 결제할 수 있는 EVOTO같은 프로그램을 원합니다
It is probably not processing the image, so back to photoshop and LR
@@A.Z.Ademiluyi on some of them you’re right. Just doesn’t register the people when there’s too many or too far away. Hopefully it’s updated.
It should have dodge and burn. My understanding is that it doesn't.
@@KrunchyJD I’ll check into it but I agree. There definitely should be.
@@willsimpsonphoto it has Dodge and Burn
Not worth it for many reasons. The first one is the time it takes to process on almost each step and change, even just when zooming in. It's not a time saver as we could imagine. Second reason is that it easily brings that "AI fake touch" in results and a digital "plastic" appearance, by creating weird textures and color spots, flat zones, etc. I was expecting something higher in quality (that other AI softwares nowadays have). Too expensive, and not that helpful for beauty retouching professionals, maybe for photographers that have no retouching skills, and for "basic and fast" retouching.
@@sebseb3034 makes sense! This is good feedback as well! They read all these so it’s helpful to evolve and make the product even better
@willsimpsonphoto I hope so, because the base is not bad at all. What I really like for example in Aperty is that you can bring back texture by working on fine, medium and coarse details, and it is working very good with impressive result. For many other things I have found better at the moment but AI development goes so fast that for sure they will make it better and better with Aperty. I think it needs few updates that will come progressively with users feedbacks and requests, then it will really worth the cost, and more if they keep this annual payment system (that is a plus when many other companies ask for much more in a pay per use). When it will be fully adapted to a professional use and results, as soon as they can fix the process time for a faster use, Aperty will become totally complementary and "a need" to be included into a professional retouching process.