@@RaffyDGoat I think Franky’s is good, but probably should have just rotated between a few consistent, good hair styles instead of what we got. Chopper’s is bad, though
The way Morj got so easily confused by what each SH wore in each arc, if I didn't know better I wouldve thought he'd never read One Piece before 😂. Great stream though, very entertaining
Hey Morj, I think you misrepresented the audience's opinion on Nami's fits. During the skypea nami vote you only gave us two options: 4 or 5 4 had 75% which indicates that maybe even 3 could have won. You just took as a four and did no revote. Fishman island nami's color scheme is alsp different. Dancer nami is a very creative and unique outfit with lots of details that many people appreciate. That's why most people liked. So yeah many people thought that bikini nami was boring and lame from the get go but you didn't give them the chance to vote any lower than 4.
I agree the dancer Nami wasn’t just about her being sexually appealing. The outfit was actually exotic, unique and fits the arc. Post time skip bikini Nami is just basic fan service
@@gerardwilliams7244 Every sexy Nami outfit isn't just fanservice, because she likes being sexy. She has shown multiple times how she's confident, doesn't mind being ogled and enjoys feeling sexy for herself. I don't think the same can be said for Robin, for example, because we've never known how she truly feels about fashion like with Nami. That's why I think there's a solid argument to be made for Egghead Robin to be one of the worst outfits in the series.
@@RoderickThe13 I have no idea what you’re going on about… I’m just stating there is a difference between fan service and fashion, yes fashion can be “sexy”… but a basic outfit is a basic outfit
@@gerardwilliams7244 I was responding to you saying Nami's bikini outfit was just fanservice. I see you now edited it to say basic fanservice. Either way, what separates a good outfit from a bad outfit in my opinion is how well it suits the character who is wearing it. For an outfit to be "just fanservice" it means that it doesn't serve any purpose other than to titilate the viewer, but I argue that when Nami wears a revealing outfit it suits her personality, so it's never "just fanservice". The same can't be said for other characters that wear revealing outfits for no reason. There's a whole category of anime girls who wear revealing outfits and yet keep complaining about them being too revealing as if they had no choice but to wear it.
@@aaarjs that’s where you’re wrong buddy. We ourselves learn how to draw by taking inspiration and mimicking better artists. Ai is also a good reference tool for those who have trouble drawing without one.
@@IraDeNadie You know what's a better reference too? Real life. Ask any artist worth their salt and they'll say that using real life models and environments are the best way of learning how to draw. Why do you think real art students use real life models and objects as reference when learning how to draw? It's much better than using photos, other people's drawings, and definitely much better than AI generated art, which half the time gets details wrong an the other half is bland and uninspired. It's like copying a copy of a copy of a copy.
AI people are like if you had a machine that could make any food you ask it to. Then you present someone with a meal churned out by the machine and say "I made this, I'm a gourmet chef. Without my input this machine would never have made such amazing food therefore it is entirely mine". Morons
@@RoderickThe13 the references and “quality” of the art is all highly dependent on the style you’re drawing. “Half the time it gets details wrong” 😑 you don’t use the first thing the prompt spits out at you. You mess around with it until you get a reference you find adequate for your needs. “Why do you think real life students use real life models and references when learning how to draw?” Because they need to learn lighting and perspective the bare bone basics, if they have the basics down they can start to mess with the “reality” of their art. If all you want to do is compete with a camera then you’ve failed as an artist. Ai allows you to references things regardless of reality. It’s just a tool.
Yo, Morj, there was a stream not too long back where you ranted about fake-out deaths, and you said they were always bad, but I think that’s way too extreme of a take. Like, Jim Gordon’s fake-out death in The Dark Knight is amazing. It introduces a ton of amazing character drama for Gordon throughout the story, and it’s gives really good characterization to Gordon, himself. But, okay, Gordon’s death is really good, but Gordon’s death is not like Pell’s death (I think Pound’s fake-out death is way more egregious, but I digress). Gordon’s death added a lot of interesting shit to the story, while Pell’s death seemed to just be so Oda could get all the emotional turmoil of a character dying, while not actually committing to ending a character’s life. One has a clear purpose in the plot, and the other doesn’t. One’s interesting and enhances the plot and characters, and the other makes the plot worse, and just artificially lowers the stakes of the plot. However, I’ve got another example of a good fake-out death. And it’s one that I think is closer to Pell’s death, in particular. It’s Sherlock Holmes in A Game of Shadows. I think this one’s actually somewhat controversial, but I personally love it. For the entire movie, Holmes gets put into a shit ton of dangerous situations, coming extremely close to death, over, and over, and you genuinely start to think Holmes might die in this movie. And in the last act, the fake-out death happens. Characters mourn him, and he’s said to have been a brave hero that sacrificed his life to save the world. But what do you know, an oxygen respirator that Holmes stole from his brother in the first act of the movie saved him. In most other pieces of media, this would be called terrible writing, and it would be thought of as artificially removing the stakes of the entire world and story. But I think it works really well, here, because it’s just so fun, in-character, and it feels like it fits the series insanely well. Personally, I don’t think Pell’s fake-out death is anywhere near as good as Holmes’s, but they are doing similar things, imo. For Pell, the reason for his fake-out death was the pre-timeskip was meant to be a breeze. It was dedicated to setting up Luffy and his crew as a beacon of light in an insanely dark world. Pell’s death reminded us that good people can die in the series, and then his comeback was supposed to be a sort of sigh of relief. And that’s how we were conditioned to see death in the series, before Marineford. For Holmes, the death was supposed to be more of a fitting conclusion to his character, and the Sherlock Holmes series, as a whole. Heroically sacrificing himself just does not feel like a fitting conclusion to Holmes’s character. Tricking the audience and his loved ones into thinking he died, on the other hand, definitely does. All of this is to say the problem is not Oda doing fake-out character deaths, it’s the fact that he does them so insanely often, and for no good reason that’s the problem. Like, if you have people questioning whether Pedro even actually died, you’ve got a problem with your story.
@@KyubiCloaks from what I remember, Morj said no good author ever does fake-out deaths. It’s not at all obvious to me that’s supposed to mean the ones in OP are exclusively the ones he’s talking about. Also, holy shit, no wonder you’re a manga reader. Is the magic tree house too big of a book for you?
@@RaffyDGoat I didn’t like that one as much, but I haven’t watched that movie in a long time. But, to me, Batman’s fakeout death wasn’t as good, imo. Like, Bruce already started out the movie retired, so it wasn’t like being Batman was what was stopping him from living a good life, so having him end the series by dropping the Batman persona, and then live a happy life just feels kind of weird to me. Then again, I might just have to rewatch the dark knight rises.
Morj commenting on fashion is like Tekking diving into analysis, STICK TO YOUR EXPERTISE. The post Time Skip parts were especially egregious. Please never do another topic on anything relating to fits and fashion.
morj bringing up the dynamite every time kidd/law vs big mom comes up is hilarious
You have a timestamp?
Dynamite>>>>>>>>>>>kid and law
It was a contributing character in the fight 😅
Literally just needed a panel where Law found the TNT when he was skulking around Onigashima, undercut the whole lucky break.
It's funnier because you know it's coming every single time.
Albasta nami being a 5 and fishman nami being 2 makes lots of sense
One is a cool outfit. The other one is literally jeans and a bra
Morj so real for hating the Franky and Chopper post timeskip designs
Cringe
@@RaffyDGoat I think Franky’s is good, but probably should have just rotated between a few consistent, good hair styles instead of what we got. Chopper’s is bad, though
Nami and robin literally not wearing pants and morj instantly gives them 5 💀
0:00 Morj Jumpscare
The issue with Zoro's spread is you gave his basic laundry day fit a 4.
Morj forgot whiskey peak robin :(
The way Morj got so easily confused by what each SH wore in each arc, if I didn't know better I wouldve thought he'd never read One Piece before 😂. Great stream though, very entertaining
One piece hype for life great 👍🏻 video nice 👍🏻 hype!!!!!!!!!!
2:43:03 Robin’s proportions are INSANE here 😭 WTH is this
Starts at 1:19:14
Zoro, 100%. This isn't even a question.
Zoro glaze imo
Lol
Hey Morj, I think you misrepresented the audience's opinion on Nami's fits.
During the skypea nami vote you only gave us two options: 4 or 5
4 had 75% which indicates that maybe even 3 could have won. You just took as a four and did no revote.
Fishman island nami's color scheme is alsp different.
Dancer nami is a very creative and unique outfit with lots of details that many people appreciate.
That's why most people liked.
So yeah many people thought that bikini nami was boring and lame from the get go but you didn't give them the chance to vote any lower than 4.
Very fun stream
I agree the dancer Nami wasn’t just about her being sexually appealing. The outfit was actually exotic, unique and fits the arc.
Post time skip bikini Nami is just basic fan service
@@gerardwilliams7244 Every sexy Nami outfit isn't just fanservice, because she likes being sexy. She has shown multiple times how she's confident, doesn't mind being ogled and enjoys feeling sexy for herself. I don't think the same can be said for Robin, for example, because we've never known how she truly feels about fashion like with Nami. That's why I think there's a solid argument to be made for Egghead Robin to be one of the worst outfits in the series.
@@RoderickThe13 I have no idea what you’re going on about… I’m just stating there is a difference between fan service and fashion, yes fashion can be “sexy”… but a basic outfit is a basic outfit
@@gerardwilliams7244 I was responding to you saying Nami's bikini outfit was just fanservice. I see you now edited it to say basic fanservice. Either way, what separates a good outfit from a bad outfit in my opinion is how well it suits the character who is wearing it. For an outfit to be "just fanservice" it means that it doesn't serve any purpose other than to titilate the viewer, but I argue that when Nami wears a revealing outfit it suits her personality, so it's never "just fanservice". The same can't be said for other characters that wear revealing outfits for no reason. There's a whole category of anime girls who wear revealing outfits and yet keep complaining about them being too revealing as if they had no choice but to wear it.
Luffy x Nami at the end GGWP :)
You are definitely the most unqualified to be doing this topic lol
You ever wonder if those anti ai people are wrong?
theyre not
@@aaarjs that’s where you’re wrong buddy. We ourselves learn how to draw by taking inspiration and mimicking better artists. Ai is also a good reference tool for those who have trouble drawing without one.
@@IraDeNadie You know what's a better reference too? Real life. Ask any artist worth their salt and they'll say that using real life models and environments are the best way of learning how to draw. Why do you think real art students use real life models and objects as reference when learning how to draw? It's much better than using photos, other people's drawings, and definitely much better than AI generated art, which half the time gets details wrong an the other half is bland and uninspired. It's like copying a copy of a copy of a copy.
AI people are like if you had a machine that could make any food you ask it to. Then you present someone with a meal churned out by the machine and say "I made this, I'm a gourmet chef. Without my input this machine would never have made such amazing food therefore it is entirely mine". Morons
@@RoderickThe13 the references and “quality” of the art is all highly dependent on the style you’re drawing. “Half the time it gets details wrong” 😑 you don’t use the first thing the prompt spits out at you. You mess around with it until you get a reference you find adequate for your needs. “Why do you think real life students use real life models and references when learning how to draw?” Because they need to learn lighting and perspective the bare bone basics, if they have the basics down they can start to mess with the “reality” of their art. If all you want to do is compete with a camera then you’ve failed as an artist. Ai allows you to references things regardless of reality. It’s just a tool.
Yo, Morj, there was a stream not too long back where you ranted about fake-out deaths, and you said they were always bad, but I think that’s way too extreme of a take. Like, Jim Gordon’s fake-out death in The Dark Knight is amazing. It introduces a ton of amazing character drama for Gordon throughout the story, and it’s gives really good characterization to Gordon, himself.
But, okay, Gordon’s death is really good, but Gordon’s death is not like Pell’s death (I think Pound’s fake-out death is way more egregious, but I digress). Gordon’s death added a lot of interesting shit to the story, while Pell’s death seemed to just be so Oda could get all the emotional turmoil of a character dying, while not actually committing to ending a character’s life. One has a clear purpose in the plot, and the other doesn’t. One’s interesting and enhances the plot and characters, and the other makes the plot worse, and just artificially lowers the stakes of the plot.
However, I’ve got another example of a good fake-out death. And it’s one that I think is closer to Pell’s death, in particular. It’s Sherlock Holmes in A Game of Shadows. I think this one’s actually somewhat controversial, but I personally love it. For the entire movie, Holmes gets put into a shit ton of dangerous situations, coming extremely close to death, over, and over, and you genuinely start to think Holmes might die in this movie. And in the last act, the fake-out death happens. Characters mourn him, and he’s said to have been a brave hero that sacrificed his life to save the world. But what do you know, an oxygen respirator that Holmes stole from his brother in the first act of the movie saved him. In most other pieces of media, this would be called terrible writing, and it would be thought of as artificially removing the stakes of the entire world and story. But I think it works really well, here, because it’s just so fun, in-character, and it feels like it fits the series insanely well.
Personally, I don’t think Pell’s fake-out death is anywhere near as good as Holmes’s, but they are doing similar things, imo. For Pell, the reason for his fake-out death was the pre-timeskip was meant to be a breeze. It was dedicated to setting up Luffy and his crew as a beacon of light in an insanely dark world. Pell’s death reminded us that good people can die in the series, and then his comeback was supposed to be a sort of sigh of relief. And that’s how we were conditioned to see death in the series, before Marineford. For Holmes, the death was supposed to be more of a fitting conclusion to his character, and the Sherlock Holmes series, as a whole. Heroically sacrificing himself just does not feel like a fitting conclusion to Holmes’s character. Tricking the audience and his loved ones into thinking he died, on the other hand, definitely does.
All of this is to say the problem is not Oda doing fake-out character deaths, it’s the fact that he does them so insanely often, and for no good reason that’s the problem. Like, if you have people questioning whether Pedro even actually died, you’ve got a problem with your story.
Holy yap session he meant they are always bad in OP💀
yea bro is yapppping 😂
@@KyubiCloaks from what I remember, Morj said no good author ever does fake-out deaths. It’s not at all obvious to me that’s supposed to mean the ones in OP are exclusively the ones he’s talking about.
Also, holy shit, no wonder you’re a manga reader. Is the magic tree house too big of a book for you?
I agree, I think another great one is from the same trilogy, the end of The Dark Knight Rises
@@RaffyDGoat I didn’t like that one as much, but I haven’t watched that movie in a long time. But, to me, Batman’s fakeout death wasn’t as good, imo. Like, Bruce already started out the movie retired, so it wasn’t like being Batman was what was stopping him from living a good life, so having him end the series by dropping the Batman persona, and then live a happy life just feels kind of weird to me.
Then again, I might just have to rewatch the dark knight rises.
Morj commenting on fashion is like Tekking diving into analysis, STICK TO YOUR EXPERTISE. The post Time Skip parts were especially egregious. Please never do another topic on anything relating to fits and fashion.