Absolutely zero logic to having Anderson 2nd because he failed a drug test to help him recover from a horrendous leg break when he was already washed. If you say he can't be number 1 because he failed a test, ok. But then he can't be on the list at all. You either have anderson on at number 1 or don't include him. Having him on the list but below someone else is beyond stupid. I think you fell for the logic of people in the media not putting Jones first because he failed tests. Difference is those people are bumping jones down because we don't know how long he was cheating for but we know he did it in his prime. Anderson did it for a specific reason when his career was already done. It's just terrible logic my dude.
Welp, it's good thing we can have our own opinions, I do see your point here but this is cold hard rule of the channel regardless of the circumstance if you fail a test you cannot be number 1. I'm trying to be as objective and unbiased as possible in these lists. Giving Anderson pity for the circumstance of failing a drug test wouldn't do that. Weidman had a similar leg break and did not fail a PED test
@@owenexsoctagon9 okay then take him off the list entirely. Putting him second is completely ridiculous and arbitrary. It's a BEST middleweight list. Anderson was comfortably the best. He didn't magically get worse at fighting that Izzy cause he failed a test when he was like 40 years old. That's like putting Bolt as the second best sprinter if he failed a drug test lol. You either have Bolt 1st, or remove him, you wouldn't put Bolt second if he failed a test would you? lmao Having him second is just maximum levels of confusing and makes no sense.
The king uploaded 🤤🤤
Absolutely zero logic to having Anderson 2nd because he failed a drug test to help him recover from a horrendous leg break when he was already washed. If you say he can't be number 1 because he failed a test, ok. But then he can't be on the list at all. You either have anderson on at number 1 or don't include him. Having him on the list but below someone else is beyond stupid.
I think you fell for the logic of people in the media not putting Jones first because he failed tests. Difference is those people are bumping jones down because we don't know how long he was cheating for but we know he did it in his prime. Anderson did it for a specific reason when his career was already done. It's just terrible logic my dude.
Welp, it's good thing we can have our own opinions, I do see your point here but this is cold hard rule of the channel regardless of the circumstance if you fail a test you cannot be number 1. I'm trying to be as objective and unbiased as possible in these lists. Giving Anderson pity for the circumstance of failing a drug test wouldn't do that. Weidman had a similar leg break and did not fail a PED test
@@owenexsoctagon9 okay then take him off the list entirely. Putting him second is completely ridiculous and arbitrary.
It's a BEST middleweight list. Anderson was comfortably the best. He didn't magically get worse at fighting that Izzy cause he failed a test when he was like 40 years old. That's like putting Bolt as the second best sprinter if he failed a drug test lol. You either have Bolt 1st, or remove him, you wouldn't put Bolt second if he failed a test would you? lmao Having him second is just maximum levels of confusing and makes no sense.