Is This AVI-8 the Top Gun, or a Goose?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 июл 2024
  • *YOU CAN SIGN UP FOR THIS ONE HERE - DISCOUNT CODE IS - 'JOMW20' FOR ANY FULL PRICE WATCH*
    avi-8.co.uk/pages/centenary-s...
    CHECK OUT MY TOP VALUE WATCHES AND ACCESSORIES ON AMAZON!
    jomw.link/amazon
    USE THE CODE ‘JOMW20’ FOR 20% OFF ANY SPINNAKER!
    jomw.link/spinnaker
    CHECK OUT THE AMAZING VALUE ‘CHINESE SPECIALS’ ON GEARBEST!!
    jomw.link/gearbest
    YOU CAN NOW HELP OUT THE CHANNEL BY BECOMING A PATRON! THANKS!
    jomw.link/patreon
    (The Small Print: The above links are affiliate links. I am an Amazon, Gearbest, Spinnaker, and AliExpress Associate. If you make a qualifying purchase, I am paid a small commission from the companies in question.)
    I actually quite liked the 1940s version of this watch, reviewed earlier this year. Sadly, this 1980s version is as overstyled and unresolved as the decade. I should know, I was there. Cheers, JOMW.

Комментарии • 144

  • @TheSweede12
    @TheSweede12 5 лет назад +21

    Not my favourite watch however I think I like it a lot more than you do. If we all liked the same thing their would only be one watch. I appreciate your honesty Great video again

  • @JamesMiller78
    @JamesMiller78 3 года назад +1

    Such a thorough review. Gives me more details to pay attention to.

  • @Snek03
    @Snek03 5 лет назад +5

    I actually love the dial! Very much reminds me of my fighter jet flying days(on Tom Clancy's Hawx cough cough)! The seconds hand looks great and is very easy to read when you figure it out. I also love that it combines both hour and minute numerals. It just really does a good job of simulating instrument panels including the angular plane. The lume does suck though. I wouldn't want to spend on this watch because I wouldn't wear it now, but I would've loved it as a teenager!

  • @TimedSquare
    @TimedSquare 5 лет назад

    Very sound advice and thank you for the review. I do agree: it lacks "straightforwardness" for me, which is my #1 factor to choose a watch. Cheers

  • @lupo1185
    @lupo1185 5 лет назад +1

    Another find and honest review, much appreciated. Best Intro yet...my first thought on the watch "the crown is way to small", the second "why the secondshand isn't moving" until I realized, the white line being part of the dial-design. Fully agree, just a little overdone.
    I really like their "non hands-design" (I think the hawker-harrier...) with the moving discs. If they let you, you should review that one ;)

  • @riseuplight
    @riseuplight 5 лет назад

    Thanks for your honesty!

  • @Jaseph2
    @Jaseph2 3 года назад +3

    I appreciate that Jody’s reviews are honest. I also appreciate that he always mentions the good and the bad. I personally don’t think it’s such a bad looking watch, although I think there are better looking models.
    Also I think that AV-8 pieces aren’t really meant to be pilot watches, but try to capture the design of various aircraft. This is why many of them have control panel like designs.

  • @bigpizzapie
    @bigpizzapie 5 лет назад

    Thanks for the honest review

  • @thewatchloungechris
    @thewatchloungechris 5 лет назад

    Great title love Top Gun! And great review as always

  • @adrianmorris3772
    @adrianmorris3772 5 лет назад

    Strangely enough,Jody, I like this watch. Thanks for sharing your video. Best regards from Adrian in Sheffield England 😀

  • @tomabaksic9384
    @tomabaksic9384 2 года назад

    Great video and honest review as always. I would very much appreciate your opinion on Avi-8 Spitfire Type 300 Automatic. Kind Regards

  • @kitabshah193
    @kitabshah193 5 лет назад +3

    For what it's worth I think it looks really cool. Which perhaps says more about me than the watch. I am a big fan of the super busy Citizen Skyhawk.

  • @MSylar
    @MSylar 5 лет назад

    I like your channel with all those great watches on affordable price. You should make a review about Casio BEM-111D, it has a decent specification with a price tag below 80 USD.

  • @Micah-Woods
    @Micah-Woods Год назад

    Appreciate the review! Where did you get those watch winders?

  • @beats4you154
    @beats4you154 5 лет назад +4

    I like it. Good price and original.

  • @balpreetsingh8624
    @balpreetsingh8624 5 лет назад

    Jody you have to review the 'orient oyster' watch! Now a discontinued model but neverthless very charming and great spec and value.

  • @williamparker2922
    @williamparker2922 5 лет назад

    I can see where there maybe a niche for this watch... A person who collects something and never opens the packaging, maybe. Like one of those limited edition Hot Wheels cars.
    Great video and review.

  • @memberberry6177
    @memberberry6177 5 лет назад +2

    If it were lumed like the picture, I'd actually love it.

  • @lenpowell6647
    @lenpowell6647 5 лет назад

    Hey hey....Got my first Seiko auto 5 today finally.1980 built with a7009A heart.Immaculate and all numbers match.Arrived running and am a serious honeymoon.I took your review weeks ago to decide to get one albeit the older internals.Swapped straps with the only rubber18mm to hand and love it.Owe it to your review kid.Cheers.Len.

  • @DeusNyx
    @DeusNyx 5 лет назад +1

    The 1920s & 1940s, look GORGEOUS!!!!!
    For a pilot watch, min, hours, seconds, and indices should all be lumed, or have some kind of lume. I'd take any Oris pilot watch over this 1980 version anyday. Oris kinda have that side of the market under thier wing.
    Great review, honest. I see what you mean by dogs breakfast, why no lume, why transparent half of it, why confuse the seconds hand... argh!

  • @redletterl78
    @redletterl78 5 лет назад +1

    I’m somewhat surprised that I like all 4 designs! Perhaps this one less so, but they’ve got a solid theme going imo. Can’t speak to the long term quality, but I’d be happy to own one on specs and looks myself.

  • @derbagger22
    @derbagger22 4 года назад +2

    I quite like it. It's unique, it's stylish. I understand that a purist doesn't like it because legibility and clean looks are the name of the game. But many that aren't that stringent on those ideals will likely be complimenting you on it...

  • @TheFlyrodder68
    @TheFlyrodder68 5 лет назад

    This one can simply crash and burn, lol! Nice review and I can't agree with you more, so spot on all around. Thumbs up!

  • @SoCalWatchReviews
    @SoCalWatchReviews 5 лет назад

    That thing is super top heavy!! Great review, shame on the company for the “fake” lume!!

  • @stevejamieson1613
    @stevejamieson1613 5 лет назад

    Couldn’t agree more. I bought the quartz AV-8 Hurricane in black PVD. Looked amazing online but reality is a different thing. I hate the dial with a passion that burns. It’s a rubbishy one piece mould injected thing with no applied indices. The lume has all the brilliance of an elderly firefly and the strap is as thick as a piece of brisket and as long as a Japanese WW2 midget submarine. I have worn it twice and I think that’s one too many times. I’ll be putting it on EBay as soon as I get the chance. Might do a RUclips of the thing first perhaps 🧐

  • @MrAdjaize
    @MrAdjaize 5 лет назад +25

    AVI-OID

    • @ZodiakAsHell
      @ZodiakAsHell 5 лет назад

      hahaha

    • @DeusNyx
      @DeusNyx 5 лет назад

      I see what you did there. Brilliant!!!

  • @VulcanSpock
    @VulcanSpock 5 месяцев назад

    I actually like the watch a lot, simply because it looks so different from the usual and conventional dial designs.

  • @chrispeek380
    @chrispeek380 5 лет назад

    The face is busy but actually the case and strap are one of the better looking combos I've seen, but I think your point stands dial-wise. It's obvious there's little historical reference and they are just making it up as an aesthetic grab bag.

  • @fatkev1983
    @fatkev1983 5 лет назад +8

    The RAF moved to a quartz Seiko 7A28-7120 chrono in the 80s... with a rather no nonsense and all business dial.
    In fact... the previous decade with the mechanical Valjoux 7733 powered chronos had a similar overall look. Dull blasted case finish to reduce reflections, black dial face, contrasting white hands and markings for improved low light reading and sub dials with multiple pushers to operate.
    I struggle to see how this watch represents the RAF in the 1980s in the slightest. I guess I'm.more upset at the use of the RAF name with little to no respect for the actual time pieces used throughout the decades. A total let down for me. Still got like as the video was still great.

  • @ZCherish
    @ZCherish 5 лет назад +6

    Man, Jody when he doesn't like a watch is a tad scary...makes me feel like I did something wrong. I'm sorry...?

  • @Norman-yq3hl
    @Norman-yq3hl 5 лет назад

    Not my cup of tea either. Saw a review of a black case version on another channel and it looked like it might have had lume, but no lume shot offered. We're lucky that AV-8 didn't actually add big hair. Mercer Watch Co. is coming out with a nice 200m dress/diver with an inner bezel. Hope you have a chance to review it. Have added a sharkskin strap to my Zelos Mako Bronze. Seemed appropriate. Only water resistant, so I'll have to change if I'm headed to the ocean. All the best and enjoy the Spring.

  • @apb3251
    @apb3251 5 лет назад

    Love the honesty. Will you get round to reviewing any of the Dan Henry range of decades?

    • @JustOneMoreWatch
      @JustOneMoreWatch  5 лет назад +1

      I have one of the 1930s ones in for review later this month. Cheers!

    • @apb3251
      @apb3251 5 лет назад

      Good stuff. I have the 1939. I also like the 1970

  • @sauerchild
    @sauerchild 4 года назад

    Hey dude..I just bought the Breitling Navitimer 92 UNITED STATES NAVY TOP GUN LIMITED EDITION FIGHTERS WEAPONS SCHOOL PIECE!.

  • @gordonanderson6216
    @gordonanderson6216 5 лет назад

    I always presumed that the small seconds feature was just a visual check that the watch was running, a normal small seconds dial isn't much use for timing anything is it?

  • @kevorknourian5442
    @kevorknourian5442 5 лет назад +2

    Awesome watches I own several of them

    • @vincentjack735
      @vincentjack735 3 года назад

      This is a great looking watch. I think so

  • @KonvoyChief
    @KonvoyChief 5 лет назад

    Thanks for reviewing this. Didn't know you've reviewed AVI-8 before so will check them out. Generally is the brand good value for money and worth buying? And with the discount code I might just grab one.

  • @fondajames
    @fondajames 5 лет назад +1

    I actually really like the design lol unfortunately not enough to own but it is more appealing to me than the 40s and 60s dials they made

  • @Masterpsflood
    @Masterpsflood 5 лет назад

    The only thing I like about the design is the translucent smoke black dial

  • @abdulrahimalzahrani6882
    @abdulrahimalzahrani6882 5 лет назад

    Great watch without any doubt ,,😎

  • @jorge23483
    @jorge23483 5 лет назад

    🤔 How curious. Patrick's chanel: Take Time got the black version and it have lume (not so impressive if I say), so maybe is a difference between pvd and stainless steel version? Either way, thanks for the video pal 👍.

  • @billsplumbing6998
    @billsplumbing6998 4 года назад

    Where can I get the same watch winder that’s on the shelf

  • @vincentjack735
    @vincentjack735 3 года назад

    I like that. Very cool looking

  • @MarcTheWatchman
    @MarcTheWatchman 5 лет назад

    Nice review, shame the watch wasn't as good as it could have been. Got a challenge for you - you've found some amazing deals recently on automatic watches that were really high quality like the Guanquin and StarKing (which I added to my collection, thanks again :D ) . Do you think you could possibly do a review at some point on what you feel is the best value-for-the-money automatic chronograph?

  • @keaton1283
    @keaton1283 5 лет назад

    "Watch" the birdie! ;)

  • @charliedoyle118
    @charliedoyle118 5 лет назад +2

    That watch has a “butter face.” She has a nice case and band, butter face.

  • @MoonfaceMartin88
    @MoonfaceMartin88 5 лет назад +11

    Neither a flightsuit and Ray Bans, nor shirtless with a volleyball? I am disappointed...

  • @Ram-jw9ry
    @Ram-jw9ry 5 лет назад

    I don’t own one, but I have to say I don’t agree. It’s not that bad and the front dial isn’t rhat unattractive. I’m actually thinking of purchasing one. Regardless, nice review as usual bud. Thank you! Love watching your reviews all the way from Texas!

  • @syndicatedsatellite7288
    @syndicatedsatellite7288 5 лет назад

    It reminds of a typical watch, you would see on ali express. I would buy that watch if it were on ali express.

  • @diydad7704
    @diydad7704 4 года назад

    I passed at 3:25 when you mentioned the movement. Yes, a decent watchmaker can regulate it to something like +6 seconds but i bet ten times the price of this watch that it hasn't been done.
    Looking at their site i see watches that remind me of german Stowas while the Harrier series is a complete laugh. By the time you manage read these dials you crash into the runway.
    There is a reason why real military watches are simple, clear and straight forward and not toys like the Harriers.

  • @H1euTr4n
    @H1euTr4n 5 лет назад +1

    Hello Jody, might I ask when you will surprise us with a review of the new Phoibos Eagle Ray?

    • @JustOneMoreWatch
      @JustOneMoreWatch  5 лет назад +2

      Thursday mate!! 48 hours time. Cheers!

    • @H1euTr4n
      @H1euTr4n 5 лет назад +1

      @@JustOneMoreWatch I'll look forward to it! Also love your brutal honesty in this video!
      Cheers

  • @sugarboy0622
    @sugarboy0622 3 года назад

    Where are these watches made? Does anyone know?

  • @HH60gPaveHawk
    @HH60gPaveHawk 5 лет назад

    Yeah that thing looks like a designer got a little too drunk. Great review!

  • @simondonald1040
    @simondonald1040 5 лет назад

    Love it

  • @ROrneli
    @ROrneli 10 месяцев назад

    that 0 at the 12 o clock part of the dial destroyed this watch.

  • @gitmoholliday5764
    @gitmoholliday5764 5 лет назад

    Bummer... and I wanted a 1970's also ( with some nice big orange secondhand )

  • @rick3670
    @rick3670 3 года назад

    As you pointed out, the purpose of a pilot’s watch is for ease of legibility... not this hot mess of stylistic vulgarity that was consistent with the 80’s. Great movement, nice case, if someone likes it? Good for them! Me? I’ll stick with my Parnis mechanical, non-hacking, hand winding Flieger style watch. No complications, second hand at the 9 o’clock position, basic, bare-bones watch. Great review, Jody!

  • @saulysw
    @saulysw 5 лет назад +10

    Some things in the 80's need to be left in the 80's.

    • @zsel81
      @zsel81 5 лет назад

      i'm pretty sure that time device is integrated in cockpit since 50s. You don't need any kind of hand watch since then. The last need for hand watch in plane was during ww2. Perhaps even a decade earlier.

  • @charlie-obrien
    @charlie-obrien 5 лет назад

    The over the top design makes it look like an Invicta. Maybe that appeals to some people, but not to me and I have several Aviators.

  • @RondelayAOK
    @RondelayAOK 5 лет назад

    why is there a zero at the twelve?

  • @TheTarrMan
    @TheTarrMan 5 лет назад

    Like the second hand idea but yeah. . . too busy. $350 US is out of my budget anyways. Can't help but think most of the price goes to the packaging anyways.

  • @jeffm0518
    @jeffm0518 5 лет назад

    I actually like the 1960 release.

  • @lavasurfer22
    @lavasurfer22 2 года назад

    I'm usually in agreeance with Jody. Not so much in this video though. I will admit that the watch is on the busier side, but it really isn't all that much. Especially when you take in consideration some of AVI-8's other designs (or numerous other watch brands). This watch still isn't my taste, but make the markers lume and opaque the transparent section and it will be on the right track.

  • @pannan80
    @pannan80 2 года назад

    Are there no watches with solid backs anymore 😔

  • @jorritbekema386
    @jorritbekema386 3 года назад

    The dial is actually the only thing I like about this watch. Miyota...no, thick case...no, thick strap..no, price...no, dial...YES!

  • @SunsetSheen
    @SunsetSheen 5 лет назад

    Why did they put the Oregon Ducks logo at the 12 o clock position?

  • @WuBloodKin09
    @WuBloodKin09 5 лет назад +1

    Alpo in a box! 😂

  • @kellypaws
    @kellypaws 4 года назад

    Looks like an Explorer slept with a Type B and then there was this.

  • @carpandrei7493
    @carpandrei7493 5 лет назад

    So the Swiss super luminova is weaker that the Seiko Lume? Interesting...

  • @Taraisgood
    @Taraisgood 3 года назад

    Looks like a $20 AliExpress Curren watch.

  • @gundam0816
    @gundam0816 5 лет назад

    are these watches made in the UK or China??

  • @urieelSEptim
    @urieelSEptim 5 лет назад

    why is it so thick?

  • @noffler
    @noffler 5 лет назад

    What a shocker.

  • @eusupporter8438
    @eusupporter8438 5 лет назад

    I like the watch but if they tell it is lumed it should glow. Fair is fair.

  • @nunomendes2484
    @nunomendes2484 5 лет назад +3

    That was merciless, man. I've seen worse. I'm a sucker for pilot watches... Saving up for a Bell&Ross you probably hate.

  • @CIP3RM
    @CIP3RM 5 лет назад +2

    Nice watches but goddamn if that isn't a terrible name/logo, If I were them I'd just get a nice symbol to represent the brand then put the brand name on the case back. Corny names kill a lot of these (not so)micro-brands for me especially when you're paying more than $200 for them.

  • @mrfuriouser
    @mrfuriouser 5 лет назад +1

    I'm not sure you are quite properly honoring the memory of Goose here...
    ;)

  • @phillipgatelein8591
    @phillipgatelein8591 5 лет назад

    Great review yes.
    Great watch No.

  • @oldiesfreek
    @oldiesfreek 5 лет назад

    Paul is not wearing his shoes.

  • @Sillybollox1966
    @Sillybollox1966 5 лет назад +3

    Very poor quality. Saw one with the numbers fallen off behind the crystal. Whilst still in the shop !!

  • @nastasiospapadopoulos2015
    @nastasiospapadopoulos2015 5 лет назад

    What do you think is the most authentic avation watches company? Just cause AVI-8 does not seem right. Greetings from Hellas!

  • @TomajNagy
    @TomajNagy 5 лет назад +1

    I think this design echoes the 80's well. And yes, it means there's a little bit too much going on. I don't like it particularly, but I can understand the stylistic choices. About the lume. Other reviews shows it's just as is, as the factory images. Like this vid: ruclips.net/video/bwKi8ToRmIQ/видео.htmlm So it's not a lie, "just" a big mistake that this specimen has none.

  • @78thedaddy
    @78thedaddy 5 лет назад +1

    Is it just me... is the 12 and 6 not centred?

    • @andrei-cosmin.popa85
      @andrei-cosmin.popa85 5 лет назад +1

      Doesn't matter, it's a piece of poopoo. These microbrands try hard, end up screwing any good plan they might have had.

    • @paulstevenson200
      @paulstevenson200 5 лет назад

      Glynn Reynolds.
      My thoughts also.

  • @SirLoinOfsteak85
    @SirLoinOfsteak85 5 лет назад

    Gotta be honest...not a fan of Avi-8. If you want a military style watch...I mean... Hamilton Khaki really isn't much more than that...
    Or there's Junkers, which I think make much more attractive Flieger watches at the same price point.
    Or there's the SNK809, which is a third of the price... I dunno, I guess I just don't like the "busy" gimmicky dials, but I guess some are into that.

  • @andrei-cosmin.popa85
    @andrei-cosmin.popa85 5 лет назад +21

    I've stopped watching the review of this garbage of a watch half way through. I only hit like for the effort you put in the making of this video. I bet it was painful to hold on that watch for the whole length of the recording.

    • @Poltergest1978
      @Poltergest1978 5 лет назад +1

      I find the one at 4.35 very nice instead.

  • @rp20832
    @rp20832 5 лет назад

    Upvote for Top Gun, but the watch can get bent :)

  • @Capidiego1
    @Capidiego1 5 лет назад

    Could I swim at pool with this watch?

  • @damionberv5074
    @damionberv5074 5 лет назад

    Complete dog’s breakfast indeed. Thanks for posting anyway; hope your Phoibos Eagle Ray review will be up soon.

  • @paulstevenson200
    @paulstevenson200 5 лет назад +2

    "...a bit of a horror story...all over the place."
    My thoughts exactly. I wouldn't wear this even if it was a freebie. That watch could give some of the Chinese over-complications a run for the money.
    Bloody hopeless.
    Great review.
    Thanks.

  • @True-os6tg
    @True-os6tg 5 лет назад

    Nowhere need as bad as was expecting from intro and a unique look which is rare but would never buy a watch that doesn't hack esp a pilots watch .Would drive me round the bend .

  • @MrZacharyMc
    @MrZacharyMc 5 лет назад

    This is more Iron Eagle than Top Gun.

  • @michaelrouth5612
    @michaelrouth5612 5 лет назад +4

    fail

  • @oOJayWeeOo
    @oOJayWeeOo 5 лет назад +1

    Oh man....that into-music really gave me the feels but than such a disappointing watch :(.
    Top Gun is one of my favourite Movies of all time a kind of important important corner stone of my childhood and movie-enthusiasm. That beeing said i´m actually pretty sad there really isnt a real "Top Gun watch"...in the movie, in some scenes Tom Cruise wears a "Orfina Porsche Design" but you really cant get those anymore (not even used). And sure there is the IWC Pilots watch chronograph Top Gun....but thats way to expensive for me.
    So unfortunatly that leaves me with no watch to commemorate that movie and time of my live..... :(.

  • @MacPro8CoreMan
    @MacPro8CoreMan 5 лет назад

    Way to be fair Jody. Looks like a $12.00 GearBest cheapo!!!

  • @stusims6567
    @stusims6567 5 лет назад

    I agree that the watch is a bit of a mess. Just not my style.

  • @stevenwymor1398
    @stevenwymor1398 5 лет назад +1

    Definitely designed by committee. Not sure exactly how a dog’s breakfast would look different from its dinner but point taken Jody. Yuck.

  • @mrbacchus6127
    @mrbacchus6127 5 лет назад

    Yes, you would lose some credibility if you didn't point out that this thing I is a hot mess. And I think others have said, why do they get to commemorate something they have no ties too?

  • @geraldwoodny5252
    @geraldwoodny5252 5 лет назад

    The watch seemed ok until I read tony hills comments ...now I hate it but I hit like for the channel not for the watch

  • @ccw1961
    @ccw1961 5 лет назад

    How not to design a watch! As an ex RAF bod I am mystified! what does any of the design have to do with the RAF...Its appalling

  • @CyberRabid.
    @CyberRabid. 4 года назад

    I wouldn't pay more than $100 for anything with an 8200 series Miyota.
    Turn the page.....

  • @khronokraze
    @khronokraze 5 лет назад +1

    "Crash & burn, huh, Mav?"
    It had some potential given some of the other related versions. But, it didn't quite work out with the sum of all parts totalled.
    I LOATH weak lume and lume that is missing where it should have some. And, shame on AVI-8 for the misleading product images where it very obviously implies the indices should have lume. HOWEVER, I think maybe the black version has the full lume on the indices. I just watched Take Time's video review on this and his black version does have the lume on the indices. It's strange they didn't decide to lume all models consistently across all the color variations.
    I'm also not keen on the proportions. Not so much the 42mm diameter, but the thickness.. It seems unnecessarily overly thick at nearly 15mm thick. You should be housing a 7750 with that much thickness.
    And, relative to the case thickness, looking from the crown side, i don't like how low the crown appears so low to the bottom of the case and how much of the case material rises up to the bezel and crystal. It just seems like too much material above the crown and the crown looks awkwardly very low to the bottom of the case. Looks very disproportionate, top heavy, and unbalanced particularly when viewed from the crown side. Even if they didn't change the location of the crown, perhaps it could have used a larger one to balance out the look a little better.
    Patrick from Take TIme has quite a different evaluation of this watch than yours, but that's what makes RUclips and subscribing to multiple channels to get as many opinions about a particular watch as possible to base our own decision to buy or not.