Note: WATCH THIS VIDEO COMPLETELY. For those commenting I only mentioned negatives, that’s not the case. The Nokia 9 PureView offers some incredible camera capabilities but the delays in processing and other elements that make this phone lag are not going to appeal or be right for mass market. Only for those serious photographers.
The phone is made for serious photographers. Not for people with limited knowledge of cameras. You piost with the raw image. No one advertised it as anything else.
All your conplaints about camera are basically meaningless (except maybe low light) because this phone is for people that are seriously into photography. And they won't be minding having to wait LITERALLY one second of photo processing.
and that's exactly what this phone was made for. it was never meant for mass market, just for photography enthusiasts. which is also why calling it a flagship is incorrect. Well, there is some news that they will also release an 855 version of this phone. they released this one using the 845 chipset so that the chipset itself could be pushed to it's limits.
@@operator8014 Are you two suggesting the camera actually competes with the others in the high end and even around the same price tag? Because it doesn't.
@@dylanjg18 A phone designed around its camera is likely to have an above average camera. Especially considering that it has all the right specs and Nokia IS a top of the line camera designer and manufacturer. The camera on this phone competes with or beats almost any other phone camera. The fact that this imbecile doesn't know anything about camera usage means nothing.
@@operator8014 It doesn't compete, though. DxO has a very thorough review, with comparisons that outlines where it falls flat. Bokeh is pretty nice, but that's about it.
I am surprised how many people argue about the processing time. No one remembers Nokia 1020 with 41MP. Did the same if set on RAW and it is normal, it's RAW not Jpeg
@@Ignas359 Its not like they've upgraded the 41MP cam and have the same processing time; the Nokia 9 has 5 12 MP cams totally different set up, think logically.
Well, this guy is clearly a new, and has no idea what the fuck he's talking about. This is technology that's not for phones, to be read, it's designed to operate in a full blown camera, crammed into a phone.
I am the owner of Nokia 9 Pureview. I'm not sure there is another smartphone with such unrivalled photo quality and such capabilities. Every day he amazes me and in the cases of point and shoot too. I had a real opportunity to compare a lot with other phones before buying. Long processing is not a problem when the result is superior for you. That's simple. This is a goofy, clueless and superficial review with incomprehensible goals and meaning.
Thanks for your comments, as an old lover of Windows phone and Ziess.. I'm actually wanting to buy a Nokia 9.. This video almost put me off, but your comments have restored my interest to get one... I've seen a lot of RUclips reviewers try to understand this camera phone, but they don't seem to want to take the time too.. Fair enough, as a photographer myself, this Nokia is obviously aimed at people who love photography, but I think these reviewers could at least try harder... Thanks again for your comment
Bro I was skeptical of this phone after seeing some of the RUclips reviews..but I went for it after seeing sample shots at twitter from people who actually bought it.. believe me the phone is excellent as a daily driver.. day light photos are probably the best in any phone available in the market..performance is super.. UI is sleek..above all battery lasts all day long.. only bad execution is the finger print scanner..it's really unpredictable..it got the essentials right.. take some pictures bro..compare with other phones..you will find the difference..let aside raw ..auto jpegs will surprise you.. Edit: I am not a photographer bro..I am a casual smartphone user who wants to shoot some good images..this phone helps to explore the creative self of a casual smartphone users who don't want to get into the complex functionalities of a DSLR
Only the people who bought it despite all the negative reviews know the worth of this device, the camera samples are true to life, produces natural colours, depth mapping is incredible. You can not compare it with other smartphones. This is a camera centric Phone. I have been using it for last 8 months. Believe me despite the lags, slow photo processing, lame camera app, at the end when I get the perfect pictures, I forgive all the negatives. You just have to be patient with this device. Bro I would like to see the sample photos which you have taken with this device. Share your social media profile. You can check mine at - 500px.com/alkeshvicky
@@rishabhraj307 i would rather suggest you to wait for the Nokia 9.3 pureview first (if the rumours are to be believed) Otherwise buying a flagship at 32,000 is not a bad deal at all. The phone was launched at 49,000. You will love the camera samples, and after editing raw files the photos are mind boggling.
You don t know buddy to use this phone.I have Nokia 9 from april and believe me you are totally wrong...Nokia 9 is almost like DSLR and has no competition from other phones.I can t even believe how good this phone is when it takes photos.I have a Nokia 808 and a Lumia 1020 but Nokia 9 has no competition,Nokia 9 is from another league.
Watching this makes me wanna buy it more. Why? As long as I have a good picture to put it in the frame, that wasn't bad. The processing only took about 3 seconds, that was quite good actually. I appreciate you make a review on this. Thank you very much, It was nice to see this new version of Nokia.
@@dustinjames1268 bro... the 9 was never a flagship. They have had the 10 on the back burner for a couple of years now. That was/is supposed to be the Flagship.
@@dustinjames1268 $700 is not flagship money. The Nokia 9 is a mid to mid-upper range phone costing upper mid-range money. Far from flagship in cost, phone, or even how they marketed it.
I don't get why people complain that a smart phone takes 30seconds to a minute to process 5 separate images and stich them into one. Considering there is no snapdragon chip to do that that Nokia had to had another processor chip to make it happen stop complaining. The phone still let's you take other image's while it's processing. The phone isn't meant for people who don't want to edit pictures but rather snap and post go get the pixel or Galaxy. The Nokia 9 is for people who want to take good pics and be able to edit them whether in JPEG or RAW.
Steven Brothers that’s a fair point Steven. But I’ve made that clear in the video. There are parts of the phone that are incredible even when it comes to the domain of photography capabilities. Though this phone isn’t marketed by HMD GLOBAL as a niche phone. And that’s an issue. Because I know a number of my subscribers who have purchased this phone expecting it to work ‘normally’ only to be disappointed.
hey, this video is for instargam dudes, who wanna take stupid photos quickly and with zero knowledge. Pressing more than 2 buttons is already to much ask to do....
The phone is for camera enthusiasts. The camera did not fail nearly as much as you say because the pictures typically come out great. Yes, patience is needed due to the processing times, and yes the kinks of transitioning between the modes should have been improved, but like I mentioned, the photos typically come out great.
@@tonychristo119 lol..you all fool?pixel do much better without so many camera..you like it buy it..stop insulting people because they don't like it.. don't be bitch
One of the worst reviews possible. This phone is for photographers and those who have the time and patience for editing them, the camera doesn’t FAIL. Also low light photos become excellent after you tweak it properly, and always shoot raw on this phone.
Hari Elangeswaran I don’t think you watched the video fully. I said the potential and controls on this phone offer some amazing results. But for mass public this isn’t the phone camera. Listen before jumping to conclusions.
@@EMKWANREVIEWS no you haven't said through the entire video. there is no word about amazing results except the monochrome lens. I clearly hear you saying the camera is a fail. If you've made a mistake, accept it instead of saying I didnt watch the video completely, i had to rewatch bad review because of that but i was right.
I own Nokia 8 the specs are good, but the camera software sucks. I see they did not learn with Nokia 9 Pure view. So I am not sure, I'll go the Nokia route any more. I like the clean software and the phone overall, but camera software is bad. I have xiaomi mi4/mi5 that make better photos being years older then Nokia 8 and the problem is in the software.
Look , I’m not gonna leave an ignorant hater comment But you literally do not know anything about photography, complaining about the 1s wait time for the RAW files to load? Are you saying that its bad? This review shows how you haven’t done any sort of research and this device isn’t for you.... even a professional camera takes time to load raw files, it’s because they contain a lot of information Ps: if you don’t know anything about a device, you shouldn’t make a review on it to spread misinformation
To be quite honest, I'm a user of Nokia 9 and the only problem this camera setup really has is software. In automatic mode the phone tries to get ISO as high as possible for shutter speed to be as fast as possible. That's why when you switch to PRO mode you can get really impressive night shots just by setting everything by yourself. Bad that you didn't mention ToF bokeh as an advantage - it's a killer feature. Yes, it's far from perfect, but it's one of the best that we have today. This phone is for photo enthusiasts as PureView was meant to be.
Egor Krapivkin perhaps I should have mentioned more on the manual capabilities of this phone. But as I stated IN THE VIDEO, the results aren’t all bad. They produce some of the best end results I’ve seen recently. It’s just not the phone for the general public as yet. More aimed at professionals.
I hope Nokia solved the problem with killer app because many users reported they dont get notification for insta, viber, wapp and other app until they open the app it self.
True for a true photographer this offers a lot of control. But for mass public the options may seem too much. Also most people shoot in auto mode which the device along with long processing time will frustrate a lot of customers who just want ease.
This is phone camera performed slow due to a company called LIGHT which stopped development Whatever he is mentioned is correct 2 advantage of having this device is 1. Every one is looking at you 2. In idle conditions photos are unmatched with any smartphones From owner of nokia 9
I think its nice. waiting for 3 to 5 seconds would not bother me,. the phone is great with greater camera. what do you expect? you scroll the camera mode like what the hell?? its gonna lag dude.. the reason why you are saying that because you start the review thinkin about nokia is not enough.. that is what you call bias.
This wasn't meant for point and shoot. It's for photographers. Yes the transition time is slow, the processing time is long and it's true that u might miss a moment. As far as I know there has only been one camera update to the device after it was launched. The others were stability fixes. So there definitely will be more updates.. there are no processors optimised for what this phone suppose to do.. As a phone itself, build is excellent, one of the best screens in the market, audio lack depth to be honest but loud, and everyday task is snappy. As a camera , this excels in the right hand, for those who takes time to get the right shot. Most reviewers think that this is a simple point and shoot device. It isn't. But the images it produces are among the best there is out there. I would recommed it for those who needs excellent phone with an excellent camera for dedicated photography. I have been using one since it's launch day.
shansp3 not arguing the phone and the camera isn’t good. As I mentioned in the review even the camera elements like monochrome and the abundance of manual controls are like you said: In the right hands a powerful tool. However, this phone at least here in this part of the world isn’t marketed as a pro phone. Just a phone with 5 cameras and a massive push on the camera specs. That’s resulted in a lot of disappointed people expecting to get great shots in auto mode. I think Nokia needed to incorporate an easier auto mode since this is a widely available smartphone. That or amend the marketing to make it clear you need patience with this camera phone.
@@EMKWANREVIEWS I would agree with this. Most were looking for a successor to the Pureview line. The previous pureviews offered excellent imaging solutions with intuitive UI. Right now it's cluttered and it's the only Pureview available for the mass.
@@EMKWANREVIEWS I disagree. When this phone was first announced the attraction was the camera. HMD prelaunch campaign emphasised the camera. Plus I have no sympathy for anyone who purchase without research. Would you buy a new Ford Mustang? A vehicle with the worst crash ratings? Many do buy then regret saying "Well, I didn't know."
It's a bit ridiculous to what lengths people defend this phone. Yeah sure the pictures come out great every time the stars align, but if causes you to miss moments because the app takes forever to open or switch between modes, it's less useful than a flip phone with two megapixels. Processing time? Sure, a lot of data, you can keep taking pictures - fine, fair enough. But there really isn't a reason for the app to be so painfully slow. The "photographers" need hardware they can rely on. Not to mention you can't even adjust focus in manual mode for whatever reason and it resets your settings if you tap to focus. "For photographers" my ass, HMD just can't make good software if their life depended on it.
Buy better phones then... The camera was good and still is, but the screen and especially the BAD audio made me sell it almost a week after purchase...
First rule of reviewing. Always start with the positive. Then transition to the negative. Watch the elegant way Top Gear used to handle reviews of cars.
The update fixed the performance issues but it didn't fix the camera. Half the time you launch the camera app it freezes before you get a chance to take the photo.
@@EMKWANREVIEWS real life user here: I've had this phone since mid 2019 (moved to a Pixel 5 a few days ago). Initially it was ok, although the Nokia 8 Sirocco performed way better. The initial Android 10 update (early 2020) was unusable and needed multiple daily restarts. They fixed it 6 months later, but battery life has been terrible since. Also, that goddamn under screen finger print reader where you just about sprain your thumb setting it up. "oh, but you have face unlock". The problem with face unlock is if you use it to unlock the phone, the flashlight is then disabled for no reason whatsoever!! Camera performance issues aside, there's just way too many silly little bugs and idiosyncrasies to recommend this phone. Especially at the price. Oh. And if you use a third party app to record video (like trying to post an IG story) the audio is unusable, the only way to record usable audio is to use the camera app and share to IG from there.
I have seen mainly prices just below $1000 unlocked on various sites refurbished or used ...got mine for much less & am holding out for the new Pureview ...Nokia does not disappoint, but the 5g wars difficult to negotiate
I can agree with this, the 9 really is complicated, and as a long time photographer with $20000+ in gear I can say that the camera is the bad side of the phone. Nokia clearly is not able to get their software right (the problem is the color part, as you can see in monochrome images, the sharpness is excellent and images are very good looking, but in color RAW I´m unable to get the colors right), and this technology will probably be abandoned. They should have tried just one large monochrome and one color sensor like Huawei did. But otherwise it´s a great smartphone, very good loking, with clean Android experience, fast and strong, and I´m very happy with it. It´s price falls so fast, it was 5% cheaper when I bought it then when I decided to get it. The display is the best I´ve ever had, and music through headphones/BT is fantastic for a smartphone. The fingerprint scanner? I couldn´t care less. And the image quality straight from the phone is still more than enough for any social media.
Dat Dang thank you! Guess some people took it far to personal. It’s only a phone and only an opinion. Anyway do hit subscribe to see more honest reviews
@@EMKWANREVIEWS I'm just glad you do honest reviews because alot of stuff u review I consider buying myself and I don't wanna go out and waste my hard earned money so thx for doin honest review bro 💯
I really like my Nokia 9, yes, the software had some issues when it was first released, but like the Nokia 8 Sirroco, Nokia was quick to release updates that fixed practically every issue that I’ve had. Now, the Nokia 9 does takes incredible pictures, it just took a while for them to iron everything out. Which for me wasn’t a major issue as I don’t use my phone’s camera much as I’m always carrying around either my Leica CL, Leica M 262, Leica D-Lux 7 or Sony RX100 VII, yes, I like Leica, hence the Nokia 9. The newest update that was just released, “after this video was posted”, really has fixed the processing time, it’s still not perfect but more than usable, especially for quality you get out of it, which I believe is better than the iPhone 11 or Samsung Note 10. I will definitely be buying the Nokia 10.
At 450 pounds in the uk this phone is much better than the pixel 3a xl at 420 Better screen , better processor, better gpu , better build , android one pure google just like the pixel , better ram , better storage , same charging speeds , better build quality , waterproof design I don’t know why review sites are so hard on the Nokia 9 , the camera takes better pics than my mate 20 pro , better textures , better details , better dynamic range , better pixel quality There are videos showing the camera whopping the p30 pro in raw and jpeg My mate 20 pro is on eBay ,and in my opinion the Nokia 9 is the most under rated device ever maybe The fingerprint reader does suck , the battery could be better , the charging could be faster but the Nokia 9 at 450 is much better than any of the pixel phones in my humble opinion and that camera is great
I still wish Lumia phones are back. I'm still using my 730 for email and surfing. The battery was best with Nokia phones. After the partnership with Zeiss the camera improved or even better than Sony. I still remember the N71 with 5MP camera. I took so many photos with that. At least Nokia brand was justified by MS and now HMD. But the recent phones are low on battery. I have not used any Nokia phone with Android but hope they increase the size of the battery too. They can start to lead the market again.
This is still the best camera smartphone. It even outperforms the overhyped Samsung Galaxy S23. Nokia is an experienced brand. It's never easy to beat Nokia's PureView technology. Excellent job Nokia! 💯👌
Whilst it’s nice too see Nokia back at with phones I kinda feel like they’ve rushed this one from what I’ve seen on videos (not played with it myself it seems rushed not as polished as it should be )
Ow. Camera is arguably the best on all smartphones to date except in low light. RAW and monochrome RAW is phenomenal to work on. Gee. You don't know what you're talking about.
Mr. Emkwan would you please explain for me that how much money did Samsung and iPhone companies give you in order to have a negative advertisement about this copy of Nokia? Please notice that there is no complain about this phone also had passed a successful test with Samsung 10 then please speak logically about this copy of Nokia. Thanks
I’m sorry, but this is a very bad review. So you’re basically saying this is a bad phone just because it has longer processing times when taking pictures? You said it yourself in the review that it actually takes very nice photos after you learn how to work with it and that it takes the best monochrome pictures. Also, non of the samples you showed us looked bad. They actually looked pretty nice.
If you are a nokia user.even before...you will know and understand..for me..as a consumer...just look for a nearest nokia store and see for yourself the phone you wanted to buy..for me..If Im a phone reviewer.I will just review...whats inside a particular phone brand and model..and let the consumer decide..no bashing and no comparison of which is great..if you are a nokia fan..whatever it is then go for it... Even if theres out of this world specs of other smartphones..if you love 1 brand you will go for it becuse you know for yourself that your satisfied of it
It is only two months since I bought Nokia 9 and when I start recording the video it has very #bad_sounds. How am I going to remove the sounds, it is also very slow after it takes an image. sometimes it crashes. Tell me How I can get the company to inform them the video camera problems. With regards!!!
It's not the phones fault it's just the software. It takes time to process but of course it will, it's taking so much detail in it takes longer than a usual phone to process that all
That's it ? negatives things about Nokia9? means that is a great phone cuz there are a lot of phones with a lot of hi end technologies and highter prices that are crap at the photograph department.
After more then 5monts of having this phone, the quality of pictures are horrible you need to do so many editiengs u get a decent quality! Very slow , most of the time the camera freeze, and now I have problems with the sound
You missed the part that this phone is water resistant/proof. Camera processing is normal as it is a large file not a jpeg. But i get your point though. But this phone is intended for photographers not a gamer that needs a faster work.
Image processing time doesn't bother me, I rarely check photos straight away... however the fingerprint scanner...that is the only thing making me unsure of this handset still, as UK prices on the Nokia 9 are amazing at present, £449 for a very we'll spec'd phone...
I bought one from Amazon warehouse in the recent sale, sadly there was an issue with the camera that made me return it but I plan to buy another NEW. I can tell you my experience playing with the phone, couldn't find any issue with the fingerprint scanner. Need to hold your thumb for about 1 second and when doing that it didn't fail me out of around 30 tries.
@@Tetlee Do you need to power the screen on to use fingerprint unlock, or can you use it from screen off? I have the Nokia 8 now, the fingerprint scanner is great from screen off...
@@chriswilcox8977 damn I'm not sure about that now you ask, think you had to power the screen first. I'm also using a Nokia 8 at the moment and the feel of the 9 was so much better IMO, both device and snappiness. I'm getting fed up with keep carrying my Nokia 808 around for photos which I'm hoping only the Nokia 9 can get me to a single device.
He look too good! It's too bad the camera on the Nokia 9 don't. With all that stuff for the camera that camera should be the best or one of the best three cameras on a phone in the world!
@@EMKWANREVIEWS You are a bad guy.. You are making a fun of Vishal Saini(V S Vlogs) cause he's having too low subs.. Don't be selfish after becoming a big RUclipsr..😳😳 Nothing to say now 😶😶 I'm disappointed by your replies to your viewers.. Too Bad 🤦♂️☹️
Honestly, he was talking about the camera app that is so slow and that could be a minus even for me. I have watched some other reviews of this phone and they all mentioned that issue as well... I don't like a slow phone too and I don't shoot in jpg anymore. So that kind of issue will really affect my decisions of buying it. No matter how much great the camera is, I would rather use a DSLR and be that photography genius on using so many MANUAL setups than relying on AUTOMATIC functioning of everything. Yes, it does shoot a very impressive photo but the fact that that phone does it automatically will never rival the DSLR users like me when talking about talents.
What I can't stand is the more you spend on a phone the less you get as far as like a big screen and other options that some of the cheaper phones have
@@molestedmango only if you are stupid enough to leave it on the edge with vibrate turned on ...I have the Nokia case for the phone & have dropped it four feet onto a concrete floor without problem ...this phone seems pretty rugged to me
@@ArtichokeV for crying out loud it's not stupid to leave a phone on a table... i returned the awful faulty nokia 9 and got an oppo and guess what? i can leave the damn thing anywhere and it will never vibrate off of anything with vibrate turned all the way up. face it the nokia 9 was just a terrible phone
Yo compré este modelo y quedó decirles que no pierdan su dinero, es una basura :/ se queda pegado, la cámara es reeelenta, se sale de aplicaciones y un sin fin de malos ratos, NO LO COMPREN
I am looking to buy this phone and jump into your review. The problem I have is that you started mentioning the interesting camera array features, which by the way is based on a camera names Light, which introduces a nontraditional camera lens array. Now when you go to the detailed analysis you bring issues that are of a traditional phone camera. For example, RAW file latency when storing files ?...I think the lag is normal, on the backstage, the camera is stitching photos and recording it in raw format, even my professional camera Sony A7RII takes some time with a high-speed flashcard. So here the analysis needs to be taken from a different approach, I think!. The camera menus explanation is helpful because yes I can see that setting can take time but again is using the same comparison as a normal camera phone. With 5 Lenses and 2 monochromes, I think this phone is not for everyone, but for users that want to have a more instrumental camera in their phone for a specific purpose. Thanks again my comments are intended to add value to the discussion and I am trying to make a decision to buy it. Cheers
Nokia just posted a major OS update for my 9 Pureview ...seems the camera got faster, but while rarely used in rapid fire mode, I have never had a buffer problem ...easily the best cell phone camera I have used
the only shortcoming you mentioned is processing time. bro look at the information / layers it is capturing for just one photo. this processing time is nothing when you look at the stunning results. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS PHONE TO EVERYONE.
i really liked your semi informal format and am GLAD to have come by your channel. hope you get more recognition and if needed (though i don't really adore them) make the (semi fakish) glossy videos for you to be pickrd up by more viewers snd get pre-launch invites snd review pieces from big brands. your style and matter of factness is something i could have tsken help from to decide between the Pixel4a, Cheapish Nord2020 and a mid range iPhone for gifting to a senior citizen family member (who are presently on Samsung basic phones like A50 et al)
Not sure why some people are being snarky. While I think there is a lot more that could be said on this phone, I found this review to be very valuable. Thank you!
My phone is Nokia 3.2! I very excited my phone, because, I grab capture photos. It's just very good to me. And HD quality, is awesome..! I'll be often like from Nokia mobile this..!! 😁😁😁👍🏻👍🏻
This is ridiculous, this camera is absolutely superior by quality. Grandpa Daniel remembers waiting a week or 24 hour "Quickphoto" development for absolutely shitty images in comparison just 15 years ago. Even professional cameras were worse and you most of the times had to transport the film manual with your thumb. You aways missed photos (and I still do). 3 seconds for processing such image quality is incredible.
Note: WATCH THIS VIDEO COMPLETELY. For those commenting I only mentioned negatives, that’s not the case. The Nokia 9 PureView offers some incredible camera capabilities but the delays in processing and other elements that make this phone lag are not going to appeal or be right for mass market. Only for those serious photographers.
The phone is made for serious photographers.
Not for people with limited knowledge of cameras. You piost with the raw image.
No one advertised it as anything else.
when is the nokia 10 coming out if its no good then im not expecting nokia to be great again
All your conplaints about camera are basically meaningless (except maybe low light) because this phone is for people that are seriously into photography. And they won't be minding having to wait LITERALLY one second of photo processing.
and that's exactly what this phone was made for. it was never meant for mass market, just for photography enthusiasts. which is also why calling it a flagship is incorrect. Well, there is some news that they will also release an 855 version of this phone. they released this one using the 845 chipset so that the chipset itself could be pushed to it's limits.
ruclips.net/video/8n0-4NsV6u4/видео.html
Talking about the camera but you only compared portrait photos that never left your apartment.
That's how garbage phone reviewers doing garbage phone reviews like to work.
@@operator8014 Are you two suggesting the camera actually competes with the others in the high end and even around the same price tag? Because it doesn't.
@@dylanjg18 A phone designed around its camera is likely to have an above average camera. Especially considering that it has all the right specs and Nokia IS a top of the line camera designer and manufacturer.
The camera on this phone competes with or beats almost any other phone camera. The fact that this imbecile doesn't know anything about camera usage means nothing.
@@operator8014 It doesn't compete, though.
DxO has a very thorough review, with comparisons that outlines where it falls flat.
Bokeh is pretty nice, but that's about it.
@@operator8014 how you gonna take advice from someone who plucks their eyebrows
I am surprised how many people argue about the processing time. No one remembers Nokia 1020 with 41MP. Did the same if set on RAW and it is normal, it's RAW not Jpeg
The 1020 was also six years ago. I would expect things to improve with time.
My poco also generate raw with gcam but take 1/5 sec
@@Ignas359 Its not like they've upgraded the 41MP cam and have the same processing time; the Nokia 9 has 5 12 MP cams totally different set up, think logically.
Well, this guy is clearly a new, and has no idea what the fuck he's talking about. This is technology that's not for phones, to be read, it's designed to operate in a full blown camera, crammed into a phone.
@@SatnamSingh-mx2uc poco...haha
I am the owner of Nokia 9 Pureview. I'm not sure there is another smartphone with such unrivalled photo quality and such capabilities. Every day he amazes me and in the cases of point and shoot too. I had a real opportunity to compare a lot with other phones before buying. Long processing is not a problem when the result is superior for you. That's simple. This is a goofy, clueless and superficial review with incomprehensible goals and meaning.
Thanks for your comments, as an old lover of Windows phone and Ziess.. I'm actually wanting to buy a Nokia 9.. This video almost put me off, but your comments have restored my interest to get one... I've seen a lot of RUclips reviewers try to understand this camera phone, but they don't seem to want to take the time too.. Fair enough, as a photographer myself, this Nokia is obviously aimed at people who love photography, but I think these reviewers could at least try harder... Thanks again for your comment
@@NightOrchids wait for the 9.1 its crazy
Good to hear from someone who bought the phone with their own money
@@krizzy360 there are not 9.1
I agree completely
Your weird eyelashes on the left eye are distracting me from the review. Lol.
😄
Rofl me too I can't even hear what he's saying
You should show yourself before say someone is weird, that’s how a coward act.
Yea...why would you even put makeup on your eye....?
Its in the right 🤣🤣LOL
Poor comment sorry. I tested and performance was almost excellent.
Bro I was skeptical of this phone after seeing some of the RUclips reviews..but I went for it after seeing sample shots at twitter from people who actually bought it.. believe me the phone is excellent as a daily driver.. day light photos are probably the best in any phone available in the market..performance is super.. UI is sleek..above all battery lasts all day long.. only bad execution is the finger print scanner..it's really unpredictable..it got the essentials right.. take some pictures bro..compare with other phones..you will find the difference..let aside raw ..auto jpegs will surprise you..
Edit: I am not a photographer bro..I am a casual smartphone user who wants to shoot some good images..this phone helps to explore the creative self of a casual smartphone users who don't want to get into the complex functionalities of a DSLR
Only the people who bought it despite all the negative reviews know the worth of this device, the camera samples are true to life, produces natural colours, depth mapping is incredible. You can not compare it with other smartphones. This is a camera centric Phone. I have been using it for last 8 months. Believe me despite the lags, slow photo processing, lame camera app, at the end when I get the perfect pictures, I forgive all the negatives. You just have to be patient with this device.
Bro I would like to see the sample photos which you have taken with this device. Share your social media profile.
You can check mine at - 500px.com/alkeshvicky
@@alkeshv8607 wonderful images u have
@@subatoyo thanks
@@alkeshv8607 Oh !!! Amazing shots 👌, should I buy it in 2020 ?
@@rishabhraj307 i would rather suggest you to wait for the Nokia 9.3 pureview first (if the rumours are to be believed)
Otherwise buying a flagship at 32,000 is not a bad deal at all. The phone was launched at 49,000. You will love the camera samples, and after editing raw files the photos are mind boggling.
You don t know buddy to use this phone.I have Nokia 9 from april and believe me you are totally wrong...Nokia 9 is almost like DSLR and has no competition from other phones.I can t even believe how good this phone is when it takes photos.I have a Nokia 808 and a Lumia 1020 but Nokia 9 has no competition,Nokia 9 is from another league.
i have nokia 1020 & nokia 808 really these phone are real flag ship phones of NOKIA. now using Nokia 8
Watching this makes me wanna buy it more. Why? As long as I have a good picture to put it in the frame, that wasn't bad. The processing only took about 3 seconds, that was quite good actually. I appreciate you make a review on this. Thank you very much, It was nice to see this new version of Nokia.
Lol even on laptops raw images takes time to load.. just saying.
@theBadBrad the fact that it is ROG, it takes 1 sec. Note that is a ROG
@@kerussotorotoro8035
Whats your point?
The nokia 9 is NOT a budget phone.
Its a FLAGSHIP.
@@dustinjames1268 bro... the 9 was never a flagship. They have had the 10 on the back burner for a couple of years now. That was/is supposed to be the Flagship.
@@thexchox1554
For 700$ USD at launch, its priced as a flagship.
@@dustinjames1268 $700 is not flagship money. The Nokia 9 is a mid to mid-upper range phone costing upper mid-range money. Far from flagship in cost, phone, or even how they marketed it.
you not understand this phone !!!
Quality above Quantity
I don't get why people complain that a smart phone takes 30seconds to a minute to process 5 separate images and stich them into one. Considering there is no snapdragon chip to do that that Nokia had to had another processor chip to make it happen stop complaining. The phone still let's you take other image's while it's processing. The phone isn't meant for people who don't want to edit pictures but rather snap and post go get the pixel or Galaxy. The Nokia 9 is for people who want to take good pics and be able to edit them whether in JPEG or RAW.
Steven Brothers that’s a fair point Steven. But I’ve made that clear in the video. There are parts of the phone that are incredible even when it comes to the domain of photography capabilities. Though this phone isn’t marketed by HMD GLOBAL as a niche phone. And that’s an issue. Because I know a number of my subscribers who have purchased this phone expecting it to work ‘normally’ only to be disappointed.
@@EMKWANREVIEWS Again I remind you and everyone else Caveat emptor.
@@EMKWANREVIEWS that is exactly how they started the marketing with it, from the concept level... do your research better dude
hey, this video is for instargam dudes, who wanna take stupid photos quickly and with zero knowledge. Pressing more than 2 buttons is already to much ask to do....
The phone is for camera enthusiasts. The camera did not fail nearly as much as you say because the pictures typically come out great. Yes, patience is needed due to the processing times, and yes the kinks of transitioning between the modes should have been improved, but like I mentioned, the photos typically come out great.
that noob doesnt know much about image processing techniques..he is a noob.so ignore
@@tonychristo119 lol..you all fool?pixel do much better without so many camera..you like it buy it..stop insulting people because they don't like it.. don't be bitch
@@SatnamSingh-mx2uc he is a noob still
Perfect my phone has some positive
You had me at 6in Oled with 6gb RAM and 128gb storage and no bloatware
The processing takes too long! *Literally takes like 7 seconds to process*. Like dude you are not gonna die waiting that long 😂.
That's too long for taking a Damn picture
it's like taking a Polaroid picture waiting to be developed... XD
He mentions a real-life scenario of the possibility of missing important shots. 7s is too long for processing!
hope the premium is sd855.. or just the lens only..
7 seconds ??? I love how android fanboys slide the goalposts as much as they do. It’s pathetic
One of the worst reviews possible. This phone is for photographers and those who have the time and patience for editing them, the camera doesn’t FAIL. Also low light photos become excellent after you tweak it properly, and always shoot raw on this phone.
Said the cost was 2,000 Euros. Just bought two on sale $495.00.
Exactly. But the reviewer is not aware of this simple fact.
Aged Desert Rat dude, you might want your ears testing. I said 2k DIRHAMS!
Hari Elangeswaran I don’t think you watched the video fully. I said the potential and controls on this phone offer some amazing results. But for mass public this isn’t the phone camera. Listen before jumping to conclusions.
@@EMKWANREVIEWS no you haven't said through the entire video. there is no word about amazing results except the monochrome lens. I clearly hear you saying the camera is a fail. If you've made a mistake, accept it instead of saying I didnt watch the video completely, i had to rewatch bad review because of that but i was right.
I own Nokia 8 the specs are good, but the camera software sucks. I see they did not learn with Nokia 9 Pure view. So I am not sure, I'll go the Nokia route any more. I like the clean software and the phone overall, but camera software is bad. I have xiaomi mi4/mi5 that make better photos being years older then Nokia 8 and the problem is in the software.
Look , I’m not gonna leave an ignorant hater comment
But you literally do not know anything about photography, complaining about the 1s wait time for the RAW files to load? Are you saying that its bad? This review shows how you haven’t done any sort of research and this device isn’t for you.... even a professional camera takes time to load raw files, it’s because they contain a lot of information
Ps: if you don’t know anything about a device, you shouldn’t make a review on it to spread misinformation
To be quite honest, I'm a user of Nokia 9 and the only problem this camera setup really has is software. In automatic mode the phone tries to get ISO as high as possible for shutter speed to be as fast as possible. That's why when you switch to PRO mode you can get really impressive night shots just by setting everything by yourself.
Bad that you didn't mention ToF bokeh as an advantage - it's a killer feature. Yes, it's far from perfect, but it's one of the best that we have today.
This phone is for photo enthusiasts as PureView was meant to be.
Egor Krapivkin perhaps I should have mentioned more on the manual capabilities of this phone. But as I stated IN THE VIDEO, the results aren’t all bad. They produce some of the best end results I’ve seen recently. It’s just not the phone for the general public as yet. More aimed at professionals.
I hope Nokia solved the problem with killer app because many users reported they dont get notification for insta, viber, wapp and other app until they open the app it self.
It is true, I have problem like that and it gets worse with P update
My nokia 9 pureview did not dissapointed me. Actually i used as a DSLR for everyday and i loved it. This cameraphone replace my canon eos rebel
True for a true photographer this offers a lot of control. But for mass public the options may seem too much. Also most people shoot in auto mode which the device along with long processing time will frustrate a lot of customers who just want ease.
@@EMKWANREVIEWS keep calm Nokia 10 will be improved version
Really?
@@balvirsingh4687 going to be hard to beat, but I wants it
This is phone camera performed slow due to a company called LIGHT which stopped development
Whatever he is mentioned is correct
2 advantage of having this device is
1. Every one is looking at you
2. In idle conditions photos are unmatched with any smartphones
From owner of nokia 9
#Nokia9PureView #Nokia 5 కెమెరాల ఫోన్. 52 వేల రూపాయల ఫోన్ ఇప్పుడు 37 వేల రూపాయలకే?
ruclips.net/video/tQe9kxtE4Vc/видео.html
I think its nice. waiting for 3 to 5 seconds would not bother me,. the phone is great with greater camera. what do you expect? you scroll the camera mode like what the hell?? its gonna lag dude.. the reason why you are saying that because you start the review thinkin about nokia is not enough.. that is what you call bias.
This wasn't meant for point and shoot. It's for photographers. Yes the transition time is slow, the processing time is long and it's true that u might miss a moment. As far as I know there has only been one camera update to the device after it was launched. The others were stability fixes. So there definitely will be more updates.. there are no processors optimised for what this phone suppose to do..
As a phone itself, build is excellent, one of the best screens in the market, audio lack depth to be honest but loud, and everyday task is snappy. As a camera , this excels in the right hand, for those who takes time to get the right shot. Most reviewers think that this is a simple point and shoot device. It isn't. But the images it produces are among the best there is out there.
I would recommed it for those who needs excellent phone with an excellent camera for dedicated photography. I have been using one since it's launch day.
shansp3 not arguing the phone and the camera isn’t good. As I mentioned in the review even the camera elements like monochrome and the abundance of manual controls are like you said: In the right hands a powerful tool. However, this phone at least here in this part of the world isn’t marketed as a pro phone. Just a phone with 5 cameras and a massive push on the camera specs. That’s resulted in a lot of disappointed people expecting to get great shots in auto mode. I think Nokia needed to incorporate an easier auto mode since this is a widely available smartphone. That or amend the marketing to make it clear you need patience with this camera phone.
@@EMKWANREVIEWS I would agree with this. Most were looking for a successor to the Pureview line. The previous pureviews offered excellent imaging solutions with intuitive UI. Right now it's cluttered and it's the only Pureview available for the mass.
@@EMKWANREVIEWS I disagree. When this phone was first announced the attraction was the camera. HMD prelaunch campaign emphasised the camera. Plus I have no sympathy for anyone who purchase without research. Would you buy a new Ford Mustang? A vehicle with the worst crash ratings? Many do buy then regret saying "Well, I didn't know."
Aged Desert Rat cars and phones are completely different.
It's a bit ridiculous to what lengths people defend this phone. Yeah sure the pictures come out great every time the stars align, but if causes you to miss moments because the app takes forever to open or switch between modes, it's less useful than a flip phone with two megapixels. Processing time? Sure, a lot of data, you can keep taking pictures - fine, fair enough. But there really isn't a reason for the app to be so painfully slow. The "photographers" need hardware they can rely on.
Not to mention you can't even adjust focus in manual mode for whatever reason and it resets your settings if you tap to focus. "For photographers" my ass, HMD just can't make good software if their life depended on it.
Best phone I’ve ever had. What are you on about?
Nobody noticed this legend
Buy better phones then... The camera was good and still is, but the screen and especially the BAD audio made me sell it almost a week after purchase...
If the only problem is waiting for the image processinng, no problem, I will be patient
I can see its the best picuters with very detailed .
I dont know may be u got some money from other compney
You made a great review man, all the hate are people being overly defensive about a phone, probably that they already own. Cheers!
I think u have been paid for negtive publicity of this phone look at your video 1.1k liked it and more then 800 disliked it hate people like u
Nokia is always a legend ❤️
I can get this phone for around $400 in a reliable new condition, is it still worth it?
Go for it blindly, Read my comment. This guy appears to be either bribed or he is a moron.
First rule of reviewing. Always start with the positive. Then transition to the negative. Watch the elegant way Top Gear used to handle reviews of cars.
NOKIA ib back yeeeee :)
No joke but the photos are amazing on that Nokia!!
Man looked at getting the phone like a year ago when used/new was costing $300 now used minimum is $400 plus...
Ouch
The update fixed the performance issues but it didn't fix the camera. Half the time you launch the camera app it freezes before you get a chance to take the photo.
Angus Gibbins EXACTLY. I still stand by this video conclusion.
@@EMKWANREVIEWS real life user here: I've had this phone since mid 2019 (moved to a Pixel 5 a few days ago).
Initially it was ok, although the Nokia 8 Sirocco performed way better. The initial Android 10 update (early 2020) was unusable and needed multiple daily restarts. They fixed it 6 months later, but battery life has been terrible since.
Also, that goddamn under screen finger print reader where you just about sprain your thumb setting it up. "oh, but you have face unlock". The problem with face unlock is if you use it to unlock the phone, the flashlight is then disabled for no reason whatsoever!!
Camera performance issues aside, there's just way too many silly little bugs and idiosyncrasies to recommend this phone. Especially at the price.
Oh. And if you use a third party app to record video (like trying to post an IG story) the audio is unusable, the only way to record usable audio is to use the camera app and share to IG from there.
its arround 250 usd in the store im working, is it worth it at that price?
I have seen mainly prices just below $1000 unlocked on various sites
refurbished or used ...got mine for much less & am holding out for the new Pureview ...Nokia does not disappoint, but the 5g wars difficult to negotiate
I can agree with this, the 9 really is complicated, and as a long time photographer with $20000+ in gear I can say that the camera is the bad side of the phone. Nokia clearly is not able to get their software right (the problem is the color part, as you can see in monochrome images, the sharpness is excellent and images are very good looking, but in color RAW I´m unable to get the colors right), and this technology will probably be abandoned. They should have tried just one large monochrome and one color sensor like Huawei did. But otherwise it´s a great smartphone, very good loking, with clean Android experience, fast and strong, and I´m very happy with it. It´s price falls so fast, it was 5% cheaper when I bought it then when I decided to get it. The display is the best I´ve ever had, and music through headphones/BT is fantastic for a smartphone. The fingerprint scanner? I couldn´t care less. And the image quality straight from the phone is still more than enough for any social media.
I like your honest review, don't understand the dislikes
Dat Dang thank you! Guess some people took it far to personal. It’s only a phone and only an opinion. Anyway do hit subscribe to see more honest reviews
@@EMKWANREVIEWS I'm just glad you do honest reviews because alot of stuff u review I consider buying myself and I don't wanna go out and waste my hard earned money so thx for doin honest review bro 💯
This is tool that fits for someone who know how to utilise properly.well you dont belong there.
Yes, 3.2 seconds is such a long time to process an image with so much contrast, detail, depth, and just everything in between. :/
Ever since I am a Nokia phone user, and I love how their camera work's,...
I really like my Nokia 9, yes, the software had some issues when it was first released, but like the Nokia 8 Sirroco, Nokia was quick to release updates that fixed practically every issue that I’ve had. Now, the Nokia 9 does takes incredible pictures, it just took a while for them to iron everything out. Which for me wasn’t a major issue as I don’t use my phone’s camera much as I’m always carrying around either my Leica CL, Leica M 262, Leica D-Lux 7 or Sony RX100 VII, yes, I like Leica, hence the Nokia 9.
The newest update that was just released, “after this video was posted”, really has fixed the processing time, it’s still not perfect but more than usable, especially for quality you get out of it, which I believe is better than the iPhone 11 or Samsung Note 10. I will definitely be buying the Nokia 10.
Nice
At 450 pounds in the uk this phone is much better than the pixel 3a xl at 420
Better screen , better processor, better gpu , better build , android one pure google just like the pixel , better ram , better storage , same charging speeds , better build quality , waterproof design
I don’t know why review sites are so hard on the Nokia 9 , the camera takes better pics than my mate 20 pro , better textures , better details , better dynamic range , better pixel quality
There are videos showing the camera whopping the p30 pro in raw and jpeg
My mate 20 pro is on eBay ,and in my opinion the Nokia 9 is the most under rated device ever maybe
The fingerprint reader does suck , the battery could be better , the charging could be faster but the Nokia 9 at 450 is much better than any of the pixel phones in my humble opinion and that camera is great
I still wish Lumia phones are back. I'm still using my 730 for email and surfing. The battery was best with Nokia phones. After the partnership with Zeiss the camera improved or even better than Sony. I still remember the N71 with 5MP camera. I took so many photos with that. At least Nokia brand was justified by MS and now HMD. But the recent phones are low on battery. I have not used any Nokia phone with Android but hope they increase the size of the battery too. They can start to lead the market again.
Was a proud owner of a Nokia 1020 for years, still waiting for them to come up with a better camera system.
RAW images are heavy, but Nokia handles it like seconds? compare to computers it is great.
This is still the best camera smartphone. It even outperforms the overhyped Samsung Galaxy S23. Nokia is an experienced brand. It's never easy to beat Nokia's PureView technology. Excellent job Nokia! 💯👌
HMD is quick on updates which doesn't resolve the issue
Whilst it’s nice too see Nokia back at with phones I kinda feel like they’ve rushed this one from what I’ve seen on videos (not played with it myself it seems rushed not as polished as it should be )
Ow. Camera is arguably the best on all smartphones to date except in low light. RAW and monochrome RAW is phenomenal to work on. Gee. You don't know what you're talking about.
Mr. Emkwan would you please explain for me that how much money did Samsung and iPhone companies give you in order to have a negative advertisement about this copy of Nokia? Please notice that there is no complain about this phone also had passed a successful test with Samsung 10 then please speak logically about this copy of Nokia. Thanks
I’m sorry, but this is a very bad review. So you’re basically saying this is a bad phone just because it has longer processing times when taking pictures? You said it yourself in the review that it actually takes very nice photos after you learn how to work with it and that it takes the best monochrome pictures. Also, non of the samples you showed us looked bad. They actually looked pretty nice.
If you are a nokia user.even before...you will know and understand..for me..as a consumer...just look for a nearest nokia store and see for yourself the phone you wanted to buy..for me..If Im a phone reviewer.I will just review...whats inside a particular phone brand and model..and let the consumer decide..no bashing and no comparison of which is great..if you are a nokia fan..whatever it is then go for it... Even if theres out of this world specs of other smartphones..if you love 1 brand you will go for it becuse you know for yourself that your satisfied of it
It is only two months since I bought Nokia 9 and when I start recording the video it has very #bad_sounds. How am I going to remove the sounds, it is also very slow after it takes an image. sometimes it crashes. Tell me How I can get the company to inform them the video camera problems.
With regards!!!
wtf, master yi eyes?
It’s need more work and more powerful processor to support the camera in the second generation . Wish Nokia could do that soon
It's not the phones fault it's just the software. It takes time to process but of course it will, it's taking so much detail in it takes longer than a usual phone to process that all
Nokia is love❤️
That's it ? negatives things about Nokia9? means that is a great phone cuz there are a lot of phones with a lot of hi end technologies and highter prices that are crap at the photograph department.
After more then 5monts of having this phone, the quality of pictures are horrible you need to do so many editiengs u get a decent quality! Very slow , most of the time the camera freeze, and now I have problems with the sound
Sorry but you need to learn about photography. Microcontrast, bokeh and ZEISS lenses, kicks b.
Nokia 9 do the excellent performance no issues... This review is very very bad and worst
Chintada Polarao no issues?! You need to use faster phones. 😂
I truly wanna change my phone to this phone! Idk it just caught my attention
You missed the part that this phone is water resistant/proof.
Camera processing is normal as it is a large file not a jpeg.
But i get your point though.
But this phone is intended for photographers not a gamer that needs a faster work.
it's a phone that's ahead of its time
Sadly I don’t agree
@@EMKWANREVIEWS Why will u agree..?? Nokia Haters never agree.. 😂😂
i likenokia cameras they are more detailed even whenyou view it thrucomputers its like old cameras thatare more detailed even when zoom in.
Image processing time doesn't bother me, I rarely check photos straight away... however the fingerprint scanner...that is the only thing making me unsure of this handset still, as UK prices on the Nokia 9 are amazing at present, £449 for a very we'll spec'd phone...
I bought one from Amazon warehouse in the recent sale, sadly there was an issue with the camera that made me return it but I plan to buy another NEW. I can tell you my experience playing with the phone, couldn't find any issue with the fingerprint scanner. Need to hold your thumb for about 1 second and when doing that it didn't fail me out of around 30 tries.
@@Tetlee Do you need to power the screen on to use fingerprint unlock, or can you use it from screen off? I have the Nokia 8 now, the fingerprint scanner is great from screen off...
@@chriswilcox8977 damn I'm not sure about that now you ask, think you had to power the screen first. I'm also using a Nokia 8 at the moment and the feel of the 9 was so much better IMO, both device and snappiness. I'm getting fed up with keep carrying my Nokia 808 around for photos which I'm hoping only the Nokia 9 can get me to a single device.
Those lashes
yea wtf is wrong with them they look sick and disgusting
@@Anderson-hi9qw they look good actually
he gay bro
He look too good! It's too bad the camera on the Nokia 9 don't. With all that stuff for the camera that camera should be the best or one of the best three cameras on a phone in the world!
I'm use this phone from 2019 and now the camera this phone hanging
You realy don't know how to use this phone....
vishal sainiii sure show me how. Make a video on your RUclips channel and let’s see how you get on.
Ya sure after lockdown i will..
@@EMKWANREVIEWS You are a bad guy.. You are making a fun of Vishal Saini(V S Vlogs) cause he's having too low subs.. Don't be selfish after becoming a big RUclipsr..😳😳
Nothing to say now 😶😶
I'm disappointed by your replies to your viewers.. Too Bad 🤦♂️☹️
Honestly, he was talking about the camera app that is so slow and that could be a minus even for me. I have watched some other reviews of this phone and they all mentioned that issue as well... I don't like a slow phone too and I don't shoot in jpg anymore. So that kind of issue will really affect my decisions of buying it. No matter how much great the camera is, I would rather use a DSLR and be that photography genius on using so many MANUAL setups than relying on AUTOMATIC functioning of everything. Yes, it does shoot a very impressive photo but the fact that that phone does it automatically will never rival the DSLR users like me when talking about talents.
Schweizer Joenz exactly
What I can't stand is the more you spend on a phone the less you get as far as like a big screen and other options that some of the cheaper phones have
It's obvious that you don't have much knowledge about nokia phones
Great video and nokia 9 pureview is balanced
You know nothing about photography and it’s technicalities
I'm so distracted by this guy's eyelashes lol I can't concentrate on what he's saying
he was a comely bloke, but does not know how to use this phone ...Nokia did a great job with it , imho
@@ArtichokeV it's a terrible phone... drop it a short distance only once and the antenna and speakers break. worst phone ever
also it vibrates itself off of tables and then falls short distances breaking its own antenna and speakers
@@molestedmango only if you are stupid enough to leave it on the edge with vibrate turned on ...I have the Nokia case for the phone & have dropped it four feet onto a concrete floor without problem ...this phone seems pretty rugged to me
@@ArtichokeV for crying out loud it's not stupid to leave a phone on a table... i returned the awful faulty nokia 9 and got an oppo and guess what? i can leave the damn thing anywhere and it will never vibrate off of anything with vibrate turned all the way up. face it the nokia 9 was just a terrible phone
Yo compré este modelo y quedó decirles que no pierdan su dinero, es una basura :/ se queda pegado, la cámara es reeelenta, se sale de aplicaciones y un sin fin de malos ratos, NO LO COMPREN
Nokia 10 will have 15 cameras at the back.
Dude, vertical videos? Seriously?
Hi EMKWAN, please advise the best smartphone camera under $. 300. I hope to hearing fom you.
Funny there was a time Nokia ruled the mobile phone market.
How much did you earn for the -ve reviews? Shame👎
I am looking to buy this phone and jump into your review. The problem I have is that you started mentioning the interesting camera array features, which by the way is based on a camera names Light, which introduces a nontraditional camera lens array. Now when you go to the detailed analysis you bring issues that are of a traditional phone camera. For example, RAW file latency when storing files ?...I think the lag is normal, on the backstage, the camera is stitching photos and recording it in raw format, even my professional camera Sony A7RII takes some time with a high-speed flashcard. So here the analysis needs to be taken from a different approach, I think!. The camera menus explanation is helpful because yes I can see that setting can take time but again is using the same comparison as a normal camera phone. With 5 Lenses and 2 monochromes, I think this phone is not for everyone, but for users that want to have a more instrumental camera in their phone for a specific purpose. Thanks again my comments are intended to add value to the discussion and I am trying to make a decision to buy it. Cheers
Nokia just posted a major OS update for my 9 Pureview ...seems the camera got faster, but while rarely used in rapid fire mode, I have never had a buffer problem ...easily the best cell phone camera I have used
front looks a lot like an lg g6
There should be more to a phone review than camera.
Girls are getting jealous over his eye lashes. lol
When the thumbnail is a facepalm, I start the video with a dislike automatacly
automatically*
the only shortcoming you mentioned is processing time.
bro look at the information / layers it is capturing for just one photo. this processing time is nothing when you look at the stunning results.
I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS PHONE TO EVERYONE.
I'm just gonna dislike this because you shot vertical video
😂👍
i really liked your semi informal format and am GLAD to have come by your channel.
hope you get more recognition and if needed (though i don't really adore them) make the (semi fakish) glossy videos for you to be pickrd up by more viewers snd get pre-launch invites snd review pieces from big brands.
your style and matter of factness is something i could have tsken help from to decide between the Pixel4a, Cheapish Nord2020 and a mid range iPhone for gifting to a senior citizen family member (who are presently on Samsung basic phones like A50 et al)
NOKIA IS BACK!!!
Not sure why some people are being snarky. While I think there is a lot more that could be said on this phone, I found this review to be very valuable. Thank you!
Lol thanks.
My phone is Nokia 3.2! I very excited my phone, because, I grab capture photos. It's just very good to me. And HD quality, is awesome..! I'll be often like from Nokia mobile this..!! 😁😁😁👍🏻👍🏻
This is ridiculous, this camera is absolutely superior by quality. Grandpa Daniel remembers waiting a week or 24 hour "Quickphoto" development for absolutely shitty images in comparison just 15 years ago. Even professional cameras were worse and you most of the times had to transport the film manual with your thumb. You aways missed photos (and I still do). 3 seconds for processing such image quality is incredible.
When there was N-Series, back in 2007, iPhone didn't get a chance to rise up.
That cameras arrangement trigger trypophobia. I don't want this phone to exist