Sorry I am noticing little details in your videos - in the beginning I thought you were getting your hair permed. Great quality as usual. Tangzu is interesting to name their IEMs after Chinese characters - this set was named after a Chinese Poet.
Oh man you just made my wife laugh so hard.....I probably need to be a little more aware of that kind of stuff in my videos. Thanks so much and thanks for checking out the review.
Jh5 vs KZ ZAR vs Tangzu fudu verse 1 vs kefine klanar I'm thinking to go for one of them, which is better suited for all genres but better for EDM and value for money?
Thanks for the review! The few reviews out there so far seem to echo your sentiments. Quite relaxed and possibly even musical set. So on the fence of whether i'm willing to pay $90 for that. Any suggestions for a similar experience at the $40 to $60 dollar range? Coming from a 7hz Zero and Wan'er, i am a bit interested with trying out a more relaxed set that doesn't break the bank. This is especially considering the fact that i can currently get a Letshuoer S12 for $100. Obviously not relaxing in any way, but the technical performance, from what i understand, is leagues above at that $100 range.
S12 is very good for the price. Its hard to find good sets with relaxed treble around 40 to 60. There is the Hexa, Crinacle zero but those are not relaxed. The Ola bass is the only iem I can think of that has a somewhat smooth treble presentation. Thanks for watching!
@@Audio-In-Reviews Thank you for the reply! All signs seem to point in me pulling the trigger on the S12 😅 But do you have plans to review the 7hz Sonus? I'd love to see your take on it.
I can recommend you Kiwi ears Cadenza ($35) for relaxed and laid back listening. Their frequency response curve is very similar to the fudu's. Bonus: they look gorgeous and are extremely comfortable
@@edoardomileto6150 thanks for the reco! Man, i have been on the fence for months on the Cadenza. I've been so close to impulse buying them just coz of the shell design - love the purple. Just that a lot of reviews seem to say it's fairly close to the Wan'er (and that's about half the price), and in fact, many say they prefer and think that the Wan'er is overall better. I have the Wan'er and 7hz Zero, so kinda worried the Cadenza won't bring anything different to the table. What do you think - would the Cadenza not be too much of a redundant set? If you don't mind me asking.
I have several songs from lots of genres. Jazz, electronic, classic rock, acoustic, classical, also different studios, Shefeild labs stuff. Really, a little of everything. But the main thing is sticking with specific recordings that I'm very familiar with within those genres. Thanks for watching!
I can't talk about the FuDu since I don't have them but I wouldn't compare these to the CVJ Mei because the soundstage is wide and deep and the technical performance are great for the price with the Mei, the treble is spot on too being sparkly but not harsh or fatiguing. You yourself didn't mention all of these problems in your reviews of the CVJ Mei, I therefore find this to be a bit of an inconsistent and misleading comparison
I read your comment 3 times and I'm still not clear what you're saying the Mei "soundstage is wide and deep" "technical performance is great for the price" treble "is spot on to being sparkly" (sparkly being subjective so overall pretty good ?) "not harsh &fatiguing" the reviewer " didn't mention all of these problems" what problems ?
Thanks for watching and for your honesty. My intention definitely was not to mislead. The CVJ Mei is good for its price. It's also $30 less, so my expectations aren't quite as high with the Mei, as with the Fudo. With both switches up The Mei does have a more open presentation and does have more treble energy. But the treble can be pretty harsh and fatiguing. The Meis increased treble energy, while it is helpful with balancing out the bass and contributing to a more engaging presentation, it doesn't necessarily translate into increased detail levels. Hence, why they are good for the price, but don't compete with some of the better items in the $100, which is what the Fudu is competing with. The Mei also has bass bleed, which impedes mid range detail. Again, it's good for the price. And yes the Mei does have more treble and upper treble energy than the Fudu which does help with air and maybe gives a boost in perceived detail, but the reality is the Meis treble is not very well controlled and again can sound unnaturaland even harsh. There's just more of it. The Fudu has less treble energy, but it is more controlled and sounds more natural than the Mei. Bottom line is the Mei is good for the price as I said in review several times. And yes, if it came down to it, if I were only looking for the better value, II would rather spend $59 on the Mei than $89 on the Fudu. Sorry for the confusion. Sometimes, I'm so focused on trying to be conscious of how long my video is going that I leave out some details. I'm not trying to mislead just still trying to find the balance between being efficient but thorough.
@@Audio-In-ReviewsI didn't mean to sound harsh or rude, it's just that looking at your review I thought your opinion of the cvj Meis was quite spot on and similar to mine, as far as these FuDus go you talk about a narrow sound field with mediocre technicalities concluding that in the end they are comparable to the Meis and this seemed to me a contradiction, also because the Meis with both switches active sound quite open and wide. Otherwise I think yours is a good review
@@seth1455I was just talking about the comparison between this set and the CVJ Mei, because to me the Mei's don't sound close or congested. They're not clinical and they're not the most technical set out there (they're not intended to be like so) but they do sound very open to my ears
Man, I really found these to have some strange thin timbre in the treble and I’m now considering if I just didn’t have the correct seal or tips… something. I found the treble to be highly disjointed from the bass
Are people listening to the right music for these IEMs electronic dance and synthwave clubland ministry of sound
Sorry I am noticing little details in your videos - in the beginning I thought you were getting your hair permed.
Great quality as usual. Tangzu is interesting to name their IEMs after Chinese characters - this set was named after a Chinese Poet.
Oh man you just made my wife laugh so hard.....I probably need to be a little more aware of that kind of stuff in my videos. Thanks so much and thanks for checking out the review.
Simgot Em6L review please ❤
Jh5 vs KZ ZAR vs Tangzu fudu verse 1 vs kefine klanar I'm thinking to go for one of them, which is better suited for all genres but better for EDM and value for money?
Thanks for yet another excellent video.
Which do you prefer? galileo or this? and which is less sibilant
Thanks for the review! The few reviews out there so far seem to echo your sentiments. Quite relaxed and possibly even musical set. So on the fence of whether i'm willing to pay $90 for that. Any suggestions for a similar experience at the $40 to $60 dollar range? Coming from a 7hz Zero and Wan'er, i am a bit interested with trying out a more relaxed set that doesn't break the bank. This is especially considering the fact that i can currently get a Letshuoer S12 for $100. Obviously not relaxing in any way, but the technical performance, from what i understand, is leagues above at that $100 range.
S12 is very good for the price. Its hard to find good sets with relaxed treble around 40 to 60. There is the Hexa, Crinacle zero but those are not relaxed. The Ola bass is the only iem I can think of that has a somewhat smooth treble presentation. Thanks for watching!
@@Audio-In-Reviews Thank you for the reply! All signs seem to point in me pulling the trigger on the S12 😅 But do you have plans to review the 7hz Sonus? I'd love to see your take on it.
I can recommend you Kiwi ears Cadenza ($35) for relaxed and laid back listening. Their frequency response curve is very similar to the fudu's.
Bonus: they look gorgeous and are extremely comfortable
@@edoardomileto6150 thanks for the reco! Man, i have been on the fence for months on the Cadenza. I've been so close to impulse buying them just coz of the shell design - love the purple. Just that a lot of reviews seem to say it's fairly close to the Wan'er (and that's about half the price), and in fact, many say they prefer and think that the Wan'er is overall better. I have the Wan'er and 7hz Zero, so kinda worried the Cadenza won't bring anything different to the table. What do you think - would the Cadenza not be too much of a redundant set? If you don't mind me asking.
@@KmtS9can confirm the cadenza is really good!
Good review and very helpful lots of iems in this price range lots of competition
Definitely, and more are coming on the scene all the time! Glad it was helpful and thank you for watching!
cute dog
Audio-In Reviews
Don't know how to contact you
Please review EPZQ5, thank you
What genre of music do you base your reviews on.
I have several songs from lots of genres. Jazz, electronic, classic rock, acoustic, classical, also different studios, Shefeild labs stuff. Really, a little of everything. But the main thing is sticking with specific recordings that I'm very familiar with within those genres. Thanks for watching!
I can't talk about the FuDu since I don't have them but I wouldn't compare these to the CVJ Mei because the soundstage is wide and deep and the technical performance are great for the price with the Mei, the treble is spot on too being sparkly but not harsh or fatiguing. You yourself didn't mention all of these problems in your reviews of the CVJ Mei, I therefore find this to be a bit of an inconsistent and misleading comparison
I read your comment 3 times and I'm still not clear what you're saying
the Mei "soundstage is wide and deep"
"technical performance is great for the price"
treble "is spot on to being sparkly" (sparkly being subjective so overall pretty good ?) "not harsh &fatiguing"
the reviewer " didn't mention all of these problems" what problems ?
Thanks for watching and for your honesty. My intention definitely was not to mislead. The CVJ Mei is good for its price. It's also $30 less, so my expectations aren't quite as high with the Mei, as with the Fudo. With both switches up The Mei does have a more open presentation and does have more treble energy. But the treble can be pretty harsh and fatiguing. The Meis increased treble energy, while it is helpful with balancing out the bass and contributing to a more engaging presentation, it doesn't necessarily translate into increased detail levels. Hence, why they are good for the price, but don't compete with some of the better items in the $100, which is what the Fudu is competing with. The Mei also has bass bleed, which impedes mid range detail. Again, it's good for the price. And yes the Mei does have more treble and upper treble energy than the Fudu which does help with air and maybe gives a boost in perceived detail, but the reality is the Meis treble is not very well controlled and again can sound unnaturaland even harsh. There's just more of it. The Fudu has less treble energy, but it is more controlled and sounds more natural than the Mei. Bottom line is the Mei is good for the price as I said in review several times. And yes, if it came down to it, if I were only looking for the better value, II would rather spend $59 on the Mei than $89 on the Fudu. Sorry for the confusion. Sometimes, I'm so focused on trying to be conscious of how long my video is going that I leave out some details. I'm not trying to mislead just still trying to find the balance between being efficient but thorough.
@@Audio-In-ReviewsI didn't mean to sound harsh or rude, it's just that looking at your review I thought your opinion of the cvj Meis was quite spot on and similar to mine, as far as these FuDus go you talk about a narrow sound field with mediocre technicalities concluding that in the end they are comparable to the Meis and this seemed to me a contradiction, also because the Meis with both switches active sound quite open and wide. Otherwise I think yours is a good review
@@seth1455I was just talking about the comparison between this set and the CVJ Mei, because to me the Mei's don't sound close or congested. They're not clinical and they're not the most technical set out there (they're not intended to be like so) but they do sound very open to my ears
Man, I really found these to have some strange thin timbre in the treble and I’m now considering if I just didn’t have the correct seal or tips… something. I found the treble to be highly disjointed from the bass
This brand does not have good drivers . Apart from the planar that they got from other company