*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/lAr1Kby1ubc/видео.html *👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6 *👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com *👉Recommended best value dashcam:* bit.ly/2GAF2GZ
french : les américains vous ne savez pas conduire. au lieu d'utiliser le klaxon, il suffit de freiner. ensuite sur les autoroutes, quand la circulation est à l'arrêt, on met les warning pour avertir ceux qui arrivent derrière. il faut toujours rester maitre de son véhicule même si on a raison (cela s'appelle la prévoyance). ah mais c'est vrai qu'au USA passer son permis de conduire c'est comme ouvrir un kinder surprise.
2:40 - Yeah, it was bad that they went over 2 lanes and cut you off. You had enough time to flash them honk, swerve, and slow down, but instead of slowing down, you went off-road, totaled your car, got whiplash, and got another drivers insurance jacked up for 5 years. All because you didn't want to slow down.
4:54 - You forced yourself into the emergency lane. The truck/trailer had their blinker on before you even started your own lane change, and you then tried passing while they were actively changing lanes. That's your own fault.
In those cases I always hear that song Little Deuce Coupe except the words are "little douche move". Not to mention he is trying to pass that whole crazy rig on the right side. I would stay out from beside that thing as a matter of course.
It should be noted that someone turning on their turn signal when there are many car-lengths between you is not an excuse to accelerate and BLOCK their LEGAL lane change. While signaling does not allow for automatic lane change, recording yourself on a camera intentionally preventing their merging safely will land you as the "at fault".
So many of these videos show a complete lack of defensive driving or just showing a little patience and courtesy. Like the guy at 5:40 who wouldn't let the car in after the car in front of him let someone in. In a school parking lot, for crying out loud. What a douche.
I agree. And by posting their videos and thinking their actions were justified it is obvious they have no awareness of how their own behavior could have caused a collision.
4:34 I can't help but feel like, had the white truck hit you, you would have outright blamed the escape driver as well at the other driver for "not giving you room to escape (no pun)", but you would COMPLETELY fail to mention your own following too close was the main cause of it all.
Not to mention the super slow response time. Clearly not paying attention, the brake lights in front of him come on almost a full 2 seconds before he slows down and swerves.
I see most of these drivers and they straight up drive with EXTREME entitlement. Like yes I know they’re supposed to stay in their lane but NOTHING but the law and a few paint keeps cars in their lane and 90% of people don’t obey either! Be defensive! Every accident except rear end collisions are avoidable!
8:12 "I've got a dash cam so when someone attempts a proper lane change, I speed up so I can be a douche nozzle and exclaim how every other driver is bad"
Normally I'd agree with what you're saying, but I have a couple issues.. 1. It doesn't appear that the cammer actually sped up, their speed seems pretty consistent. 2. The truck doesn't need to change lanes because by the time they do actually change lanes there's nobody in front of them. So what's the point? 3. A "proper" lane change would mean that they change lanes, turn their blinker off, turn it back on and then change lanes again. The cammer may have thought they just accidentally left their blinker on after moving into the middle lane, which is why it's unsafe to change multiple lanes with one continuous blinker.
5:09 CO Rev Stat § 42-4-605 (2016) (b) When a yellow lens is illuminated with rapid intermittent flashes, drivers of vehicles may proceed past such signal and through the intersection or other hazardous location only with caution. That white truck was already there. Cammer did not proceed with caution.
Yup, Blinking yellow light is treated like a YIELD, Flashing red is treated like a STOP. And no lights at all (where there should be) is also an all-way stop. I do with more people knew that.
These always seem to get people, truck should have checked to see if cross traffic had blinking red or yellow. Cammer easily could’ve given truck room, but ultimately the trucks turn could be considered failure to yield right of way as the truck had flashing red.
@@Kirk3919 It looked like a big intersection. It looked like the truck was already making the turn before the other car was even close to the intersection. The truck drivers mistake is assuming the cammer had any common sense.
@Falcon only the turn lanes had flashing red. Still camer was at fault due to not yielding to the truck already in lane before he crossed the intersection.
@@langlebl Same here. From the other driver's perspective: the lane is clear, it's better to be in the slow lane, you've got a vehicle that's hard to drive...
Its just amazing the lack of self awareness also when calling him a "road owner". Like obviously YOU (cammer) are the person who thinks they "own the road", you could of just hit your brakes but instead you sped up and broke traffic laws.
7:30 Other driver signals, they still have a broken white line, and rather than being nice the cammer decides to be a jerk and create a dangerous situation when they could've just slowed down and let the other driver in. Common courtesy isn't so common anymore, it's no wonder there are so many accidents, raging incidents, and cammers that feel like they have something to prove. Get over yourselves.
7:22 You my friend , and i use that term sarcastically, are and arse. You could have easily backed off and let him in and gained a little karma, BUT NO you had to accelerate , (yes you can you can see it and his turn signal on) and jam him, and the people up behind you that now have to deal with consequences of your Ars holiness. You just couldn't stand for him to get in front of you and that is the real reason, and you submitted the video to try to justify your actions. Sorry I call BS.
5:04 no, seems like you were tailgating and didnt give him the 2 seconds he needed to get to the so you passed on the right, get over urself and be patient.
"Forced me into the emergency lane" He was clearly behind the trailer and could have just switched back to the left lane to pass. The cammer is an idiot.
Besides the guy was already moving over when they started undertaking and chose to undertake on the shoulder. There was plenty of time to slow down rather than trying to force their way through. There's a reason undertaking is illegal in many countries and states and that's because of idiots like terry
#15 Terry, if you're going to complain about anything complain about the trailer lights not working. "Road owner" had his signal on and was getting out of your impatient way.
5:55 To be fair, the polite thing to do in those situations is to let those people in in an alternating fashion, which is what I'm sure the Infiniti driver was expecting to happen and then you just cut them off.
@@clinte7590 yeah, it’s the polite thing to do. But you’re not legally obligated to do it. Since it can and more than likely will cause a bigger backup in the right of way lane.
@@clinte7590 It's called driving within the law. The fact that the Infiniti driver behaved the way they did shows me they are entitled as hell. There is NO legal obligation for me to let them in. Let's trade paint, insurance will rule in my favor and their day will be hella inconvenienced.
@@Misshighness444He was behind the trailer, they both started changing lanes at the same time. Having a fragile ego and anger management issues should land you in jail for endangering lives with a 3000 lbs box of steel. Trying to somehow excuse that, when car accidents are a leading cause of deaths and injuries and property damage is... puzzling
@@Misshighness444 your lack of situational awareness is mind boggling.. the trailer had a signal on and a clear lane before cammer switched lanes and on 2 lane highways you're supposed to pass on the left lane. If the cammer waited 2 seconds the trailer would have moved over to the right and he could have passed in his current left lane.. Only assholes pass on the right lane on a 2 lane highway
2:35 I'm impressed at how many things the cammer did wrong. Bitches, then flashes lights, moves left instead of braking, stops in the middle of two lanes, then says it pulls right because the left tire is destroyed. He's got my vote for worst driver in North America.
5:54 if you're in the line to pick up your kids and the person is trying to cut line, then I get the cammer's aggravation. But if they already have their kids and you're trying to leave the parking lot, then allowing a person to pull out isn't going to cost you but a few seconds...
4:30 Who cares what the guy in the Escape was doing. You were following too close to the other to react to them slowing down. But i'm sure the made up story about the phone makes you seem like a better driver.
So many cammers in this episode pissed me off. Based on my purely unscientific analysis, most of these episodes break down about 60/40 cammer is right vs cammer is wrong. This one seems more like 30/70.
This compilation is particularly egregious. Not only were the cammers bad, their descriptions were so oblivious to their bad driving and just blamed everyone else.
8:10 Me: sees car with signal on up ahead and get off the gas to give him space and time to get over cause it isn't THAT BIG A DEAL. You: not so much . . .
2:49 - That was incredibly poorly handled. First, instead of slowing down (which you had ample need to do), you moved over and slammed into a chunk of concrete. You had time to hit the horn, and you had time to hit the brakes. Then you swerved and got rear ended. Then you sat in the right lane, not moving off to the side of the road. Completely avoidable. 5:58 - Why would you "tell the campus 'sheriff'" because someone flipped you off? That's incredibly petty.
@@Refort610 There's nothing to indicate it's disabled. But let's say it was/is - why didn't he just move to the side of the road with the momentum? There was plenty of it. The cammer said it was pulling to the right, and it's very clear he stepped on the brakes hard.
At 2:49 even if he had braked his brakes could've locked up and then he smashes into the rear of the car, if you look really closely he had NO time to react at all
@@noahbrecker1129 He had MORE than ample time to see what was going on as he had time to both honk his horn and flash his lights. The issue was he didn't hit the brakes at all. Also, there's this thing called ABS that has been around for 30+ years (which the Ford Escape has), so "locked up" brakes isn't even a thing in this case. The more I see this video, the more I'm of the opinion the driver should lose his license. That was pure incompetent driving.
@@neilbradley completely false. There was only about 2-3 seconds when it was apparent that the SUV was moving into the left lane. There are 2 lanes and no reason for them to immediately get into the left lane But the comment from the cammer said the vehicle was disabled and pulling to the right
Video #13 4:25 Brandon R. - Right from the start of your video it is evident you are following too closely. You are following less than 1 second behind the the SUV in front of you. Don't blame the other drivers even though they had slowed for a reason that doesn't make sense. You need to be ready for traffic to stop for any reason. The best way to do that is give yourself 2 to 4 seconds of following time. You were lucky the white SUV driver missed hitting you. ILR Car Control School
@Falcon Flashing yellow means slow down and make sure the intersection is clear. The other guy was already almost completely through, if they crashed the cammer would be found at fault.
We don't know what the other signal was tho, I don't encounter a flashing yellow where I live but can't imagine one side would be flashing red (stop sign) and the other is flashing yellow... I would see flashing red and assume all lights are the same. Seems you should treat flashing yellow like a yield sign and only go through if it's clear (which it wasn't in this instance).
@@zadtheinhaler The cammer was paying attention, not sure why you are saying that. Obviously he slowed and went around the pickup, so he must have been paying attention to something. The cammer acted like a baby, but he still wasn't necessarily wrong. This is so cut and dry, I'm not even sure why it's being argued.
As I now know, WAY too many people think that flashing red one way and flashing yellow the other means it’s a four way stop. Flashing yellow just means caution, you have the right of way and watch out for anyone that thinks yellow means stop.
Flashing red is treated like a 4 way stop sign flashing yellow is treated like yield signs only yield when there’s traffic on your right you don’t have to stop just proceed with caution. I swear people are stupid they see the traffic lights flashing and think they are broken and they are not they go into flash mode at times of day when traffic is light so you are not sitting at a light cycle forever
You don't have the right of way. The others are supposed to yield the right of way. But you're never not at fault if you could have stopped and didn't, because the law never gives you the right of way.
@@bowhuntinfool9440 Inoperative signals that don't light at all are treated like 4 way stops. So are flashing reds at all corners. John Doe said it correctly above.
Exactly, he had time to flash high beams and honk instead of getting on the brakes, then went all drama-queen about it immediately afterward. Meanwhile the passenger noticed everything first and kept a cool head.
1:22 That is the silliest designed intersection I've ever seen. Three-way stop with the uncontrolled "thru-lane" a 90 degree left turn in an intersection that looks and appears to be a 4-way stop -- of course you're going to have confused motorists! Either make a 4-way stop or redesign the intersection so it's clear that the left turn has precedence.
@@grimmster111 Most of the stop signs are indeed marked that way (Incoming traffic does not stop) For some reason that stop sign doesn't but the other 2 stop signs on that intersection does.
There are some intersections in a town around here where there are four approaches but only three stop. The stop signs have a '3-way' plaque, but no direct indication of which approach doesn't stop. So you get to check for which side has no sign. Even then, I've had a couple close calls coming from the no-stop approach. The current set-up is (a) asking for trouble, and (b) completely unnecessary in the first place. Why do we need a horde of stop signs on minor city streets? Just use yield signs like the rest of town...
Yeah, if that person didn't dive into the left lane it wouldn't have happened. It looks like they barely accelerated to enter the highway so the cammer did not have enough time to slow down enough Due to low slow the other vehicle was going there was about a 2 second distance between the cammer and the black SUV. Not enough time to slow down
@@brysonrodden5112 I don't know why you keep perpetuating this, but it's false, man. 168 Foot stopping distance from 70-0 in a Ford Escape, which takes 2.3 seconds. If he had time to flash his lights and honk his horn, he could've hit his brakes. The truth is he didn't even try. Not sure why you keep ignoring that fact.
I only watch these videos for the cammers who are clearly doing something dumb but blame everyone else. Also the comments pointing it out are always good
4:53 do you know how difficult it is to haul a trailer like that? The dude was moving over to the right when you decided to pass them on the right so what the hell are you blaming him for?? Saying he owns the road he was getting out of the way started to the right lane before you did and then you pass them in the emergency lane like an idiot.
Watching these videos has helped me become a smarter, safer and more alert driver. If you got kids that are new drivers or are about to be I suggest making them watch these videos
05:08 #14 A flashing yellow traffic signal light warns you to “PROCEED WITH CAUTION.” Slow down and be alert before entering the intersection. Yield to any pedestrians, bicyclists, or vehicles in the intersection. The cammer is at fault here, as he clearly didn't proceed with caution!
That's only partially true. The flashing red is to be used as you would a stop sign, the truck that turned is only suppose to enter the intersection when it's clear and he could obviously see the other vehicle approaching, same as if you were turning from a side road with a stop sign onto a road that was through traffic. He should have slowed down as soon as he saw the truck turning but if they had collided the truck that was turning would most likely be found at fault or at least for the majority of it.
It's amazing the number of people who will yell "I had the right of way!" The law never gives you the right of way. It only tells other people to yield to you.
It was flashing red in the white pickup's direction. So the pickup should've stopped and not proceeded until it was clear. So the cammer isn't wrong at all. But, he was being a baby about it.
@@kenlompart9905 You don't know what the truck driver could obviously see. It looked like a big intersection to me so he started his turn before the cammer was close to crossing. Then we have the cammer thinking the truck would not stay in the left lane as he is required to do.
@@mexicanspec Are you blind? The truck driver couldn't have had a clearer view of the cammer heading toward him, it all comes down to the truck driver having the flashing red which means it's his fault if he doesn't wait till the intersection was clear before proceeding plain and simple.
I'm going to assume alll lights were flashing yellow, so as to have everyone entering the intersection take note it is uncontrolled, no way they would have one way yellow and another red, at least by common sense reasoning.
@Dunder Mifflin Point taken, probably should be all red considering, what says those with a flashing red are aware of the other direction having only a flashing yellow ? Perhaps they simply assume it's a 4 way, especially if they are unfamiliar with the intersection, meh either way one should be alerted to slow if not stop and expect the unexpected. Persoanlly i don't think i have ever seen a 4 way intersection with differing flashing lights, especially a main artery. But then i don't live everywhere and laws /rules differ.
Agreed. It almost looks like the cammer had just moved into the left lane, assuming to pass the semi as it moved to the right lane, but also possibly to block the dark red pickup from passing if he had been following too closely. Dark red truck likely at fault, either way.
@Falcon I take your point, but: • The other driver was indicating. • There appeared to be enough space to merge (if the cammer allowed it). • The other driver didn't force his way in. • There was limited road left to merge. I totally agree that avoiding idiots and conflict is the way to go, but I feel like in this case, the person trying to merge was not acting inappropriately.
@Falcon Thanks for taking the time to respond, I appreciate it. Just to clarify; on your point 2 I only said "there appeared to be space" because I know dash cams make things look further away than they are and "if the cammer allowed it" because he appeared (at least to me) to speed up to block the other vehicle. I guess we have a different take on this one, still nice to engage in civil dialogue with someone who holds a differing opinion. Seems to be a dying art!
@Falcon Has it ever occured to you this person may not of been familiar with the area ? They only realized they needed to turn when they did ? Instead of being a complete ass on the road, how about people only treat those like the cammer as assholes, the SUV wasn't trying to pass anyone, they simply didn't realize their turn was coming up abruptly by the looks of it. So happy the cammer got to assert their authority on the road though, what a hero.
@Falcon Of course, but i've caught myself pushing it as well, not out of malice or my rage, it's simply a reaction that occurs, in this instance it was close but in honesty there was time if one isn't being a complete jerk, but you go ahead and defend the guy that has no courtesy at all, we share the road, no one is perfect, we all make mistakes from time to time, hopefully when and if i do someone without road rage warrior characteristics isn't next to me and prevents my stupidity from harming them or others. i've saved some people and had others save me as well, defensive driving is a thing.
3:11 Just a minor point. There would have been much less damage to your vehicle if you would have stayed in your lane and let the Explorer hit you. Swerving to an unknown area usually causes more damage. If they had not rear ended you, it would have been 100% your fault.
5:05 A blinking yellow light DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT OF WAY at any intersection!!! It's either yield or treat it as if it is a four-way stop. In this case, all directions were blinking. Both drivers should have yield and then proceeded with caution.
Where I'm from, in driver's education, they tell you if your light is blinking yellow, you have right of way. Typically the other light is blinking red, meaning treat it as a stop sign. If they're all blinking red you all treat it as a stop sign. But it very well could be different everywhere
4:56 Why, cammer, did you ignore the turn signal on that vehicle? They had initiated the lane change and you jammed your vehicle where they wanted to go. They were not the "road owner".
Hey Terry (video 15)...the "road owner" had his turn signal on and was making sure the lane was clear. Maybe if you weren't so impatient and determined to cut them off, you wouldn't have had to go into the shoulder. I've said it a million times...people would rather be "right" than safe.
@@TruthHurtsFAFO Obviously the guy in the red pickup could not afford those 2 seconds considering that he was on his way to perform emergency heart transplant surgery.
3:46 not trying to further bash you or anything, but whenever I pull up to a stop sign I'm not familiar with, I look for all the other stop signs to determine who all stops (if it's not already posted on the sign as I stated before).
All cammers have 3 things in common: 1. They refuse to brake first 2. They prefer waste time slamming the horn than avoiding or evading an accident 3. They are always right 🙄😒
Naah, only the cammers getting in accidents on these videos. I've had a dashcam for years and have never been in an accident (though plenty of close calls). Its just the idiots with cameras that aren't smart enough to know not to blast their content on youtube for everyone to see their bad decisions.
I saw that, too. It also looked a bit like he had just moved into the left lane. Wondered if it was to pass the semi as it moved to the right lane or if it was to block the dark red pickup from jumping in front of him.
Doesn’t matter, cammer is in the PASSING LANE and since the semi moved over, you have to ACCELERATE in the PASSING LANE to pass. Quit trying to victim blame!
2:35 It really doesn't appear the cammer tried to slow down. He felt flashing his lights and honking was more important. The clip starts off with the merging SUV's signal already on. Looks like another case of the cammer just not wanting someone in front of them.
There are two lanes, the other vehicle did not need to dive over to the left lane immediately. They should have waited until the cammer passed and then moved over. A signal does not give right of way, cammer had the right of way. It looks to me that the cammer saw the signal but it looked like they were moving from the on-ramp to the right lane and it wasn't noticable that the SUV really wanted the left lane until about a 2-3 second distance. With the speed difference between the two there was no way the cammer could slow down in time
@@brysonrodden5112 The cammer should have braked hard first, instead of bailing to the left. It's a common theme in dash cam videos, do anything other than brake, first. Better to hit the Explorer square in the rear, imo., All this dodging and swerving often does, is make matters worse, imo.
@@bills6093 it's definitely, most of the time it is a bad idea to swerve but would have been a very hard impact as there wasn't much time to react after the SUV started to enter the left lane
@@brysonrodden5112 8 seconds from the video starting to the lane change. That's a pretty damn long time. Cammer either wasn't paying attention or is just an ass, or both.
6:47 Driver, that's precisely why you don't be courteous while driving. Keep the traffic moving. Your actions might be kind, however you'll cost them or you when they are involved in an accident from you trying to be courteous. It's not worth it.
Alot of these cammers complain about people who think they own the road, then send in a video of them getting "cut off" by someone changing lanes, when in reality, they speed up so the person cant come over. Ironic
2:44 Another DB cammer. You see traffic entering, you see the guy's coming over, so you flash your lights and drive onto the shoulder. Wrong answer. I'll take "when to use the brakes" for $400 Alex.
There are 2 lanes, no need to shoot over to the left lane for no reason. Looks like they did not accelerate at all to enter the highway. But get this... You have both hands AND feet so it is very easy to hit the brakes and honk/flash high beams. That is supposed to warn the other vehicle to move to the right because there was not enough time to slow to the speed of the other driver
@@brysonrodden5112 Just because the driver didn’t have to shoot over to the leftmost lane, doesn’t mean the cammer didn’t have more than enough time to slow down. Instead they flashed their high beams like Dave mentioned and just went for it
@@andrew2863 they did not speed up. From the cammers POV it looks like they are only merging into the right lane until about a 2-3 second distance from the black SUV. That is not enough time to slow down enough.
@@andrew2863 This is not the cammers fault in anyway shape or form, some cammers are retarded. Not this one. Explorer had NO reason to go in the left lane in that moment, didn't check blind spots, and ran cammer off the road, then rear ended him again. Stop the cammer hate, and use some sense.
@@brysonrodden5112 we wouldn’t know because the cammer clearly didn’t even *attempt* to use the brakes. The merging car takes the bulk of this, but the cammer could have avoided this.
First one, the other car caused the cammer to have to stop. The cammer's speeding and lack of paying attention caused him to drive off the road. He was going 37 mph in a 25 mph residential area, and according to the speed at the bottom, he didn't start slowing down until he reached the other car (his speed actually went up from 36 to 37 mph). If he wasn't speeding and was paying attention he could have just hit the brakes and stopped with more than enough time.
GPS speed is not accurate when accelerating and decelerating. It does not update the second it changes as it is the time in-between two points so it lags a bit
Most signs do, but that one didnt. Every single interchange coming off the road into the shopping center is like this. I hate it, because its confusing and its right off 77 so we have a lot of people who don't really know how it works or read the signs
I'll never understand the 'gentle drivers' who puts everyone in danger just to be kind to terrible drivers. If they want to cut through or enter a solid lane, it means they are wrong.
He still has the right away over someone who has a red blinking light which means they are required to stop and can not go til it's safe for them to go.
1:25 is the kind of intersection that causes accidents because of piss poor design. Who puts stop signs on 3 of the corners and leaves the 4th open? That's asking for trouble.
5:45 There are cars lined up to leave in each perpendicular aisle. The ironic thing is that the cammer probably came from one of those lines but once they were in the main line, they own the road and no one else gets to come in.
"blinking yellow means I have right of way!" No it doesn't, it means you SLOW DOWN and prepare to STOP. The truck was already in the intersection before you got there meaning it was *HE* who had right of way and not you. Just because you have what sounds like a sports car, doesn't mean you own the road.
The truck had a red light which means he is suppose to use that as a stop sign. He isn't suppose to come out til it's safe for him to do it. The cammer does have the right away over those that have to stop at a red light. The cammer still should have slowed down and just changed lanes to avoid it, but that doesn't mean he doesn't have the right away.
Video #7 2:22 Billie B. - you may thought you were "keeping your distance from the black SUV" but in fact you were following too closely. You were only about 1 second behind that SUV. If you had been following at a safe distance, you would not have needed to drive off the road to miss hitting the SUV. Next time give yourself about 2 to 4 seconds of following time and you won't need to take to the shoulder to miss hitting the vehicle in front. ILR Car Control School
07:23 You can clearly see that the driver of the Honda is blinking on the right and wants to change lanes. What is the camera doing? "No, I'm driving here! I'm not letting you in. And now I'm even accelerating. I'm so important!" That's what you call reckless driving. Here, it's not the Honda that's the stupid one, but the camera.
I feel like this is a consequence of the momentary switch in the blinker stalk. It allows you to get 3 blinks for a lane change, but is that REALLY enough? In a case like this, the cammer COULD have seen the 3 blinks and thought the driver had changed their mind. My car has the same feature (as do most late-model vehicles I think) but in this situation I would engage the blinker fully until I make the lane change. If I was in the Honda's position I also would have tried to make sure I was in the correct lane sooner. Fault could be placed on both parties for what happened.
@@mikeL5183 What the Honda driver could have done is one thing. This is about the current situation, not about what he could have done. We don't know what the traffic situation was before. If he wasn't from the area, maybe he was surprised by the fact that the exit was already right there. Besides, there is a truck on his right. One can well imagine that the Honda driver has seen that the camera does not slow down despite blinks and therefore deactivates it again. Or he is just a prick, who knows. Just the fact that both right tires were over the line would signal to me, "hey, he wants to get in my lane" and then I'll let him in. I lose nothing of my pride.
5:07 when does a yellow not mean caution, it seems when its flashing. seems thats light signal code for barge on thru. while he handled it good, his attitude was wrong
Read more carefully - the guy who "slammed on his brakes for no reason" was the one in front (2 in front of cammer). Doesn't excuse the cammer for following too closely, though.
Matthew h. Your video shows the ford at the stop sign before you. Looking then moving on. Whilst you don't stop at the stop sign and just go straight through and turn left.
Actually, if you go back and watch the video. Traffic coming in does not have a stop sign, the sign shown to the right of the road way states "Keep Moving". So it doesn't matter when the ford got to the stop sign.
0:50 OMG I know EXACTLY where that is! That exit is always changing due to construction and it always causes traffic due to people being confused about where the exit is and they do shit like that.
So many cammers in this video (and many others I've seen) piss me off. Just let people over. Intentionally blocking them is rude and can result in an accident.
Ya'll notice how there are so many of the videos taken by cars in the left lane? Are they parked out there, or is it just a coincidence? I wonder if there's a correlation.
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 75 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5jpOiCkm80c/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 75 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/tr.png)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 76 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GB_NJHyzEjg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 79 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1Ayqevlgjlo/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 89 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/1.gif)
*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/lAr1Kby1ubc/видео.html
*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6
*👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
*👉Recommended best value dashcam:* bit.ly/2GAF2GZ
You should make a compilation called, "cammers who don't understand driving"
french : les américains vous ne savez pas conduire. au lieu d'utiliser le klaxon, il suffit de freiner. ensuite sur les autoroutes, quand la circulation est à l'arrêt, on met les warning pour avertir ceux qui arrivent derrière. il faut toujours rester maitre de son véhicule même si on a raison (cela s'appelle la prévoyance). ah mais c'est vrai qu'au USA passer son permis de conduire c'est comme ouvrir un kinder surprise.
2:40 - Yeah, it was bad that they went over 2 lanes and cut you off. You had enough time to flash them honk, swerve, and slow down, but instead of slowing down, you went off-road, totaled your car, got whiplash, and got another drivers insurance jacked up for 5 years. All because you didn't want to slow down.
They deserved each other, I would say
Yeah I don't why he just let the guy merge
Don't forget the claimed "concussion". ;)
100%. Can't believe insurance found the other driver at fault for that.
4:54 - You forced yourself into the emergency lane. The truck/trailer had their blinker on before you even started your own lane change, and you then tried passing while they were actively changing lanes. That's your own fault.
Yup, was about to leave the same comment. I don't understand how they missed that.
Missed it because they were tailgating too close to see turn signal? 🤔
In those cases I always hear that song Little Deuce Coupe except the words are "little douche move". Not to mention he is trying to pass that whole crazy rig on the right side. I would stay out from beside that thing as a matter of course.
The "Road Owner" decided to try passing on the right and submitted the results as recorded on his dash cam.
Cammer is a putz.
It should be noted that someone turning on their turn signal when there are many car-lengths between you is not an excuse to accelerate and BLOCK their LEGAL lane change. While signaling does not allow for automatic lane change, recording yourself on a camera intentionally preventing their merging safely will land you as the "at fault".
A cop I know and showed similar clips to said something VERY close to this.
So many of these videos show a complete lack of defensive driving or just showing a little patience and courtesy. Like the guy at 5:40 who wouldn't let the car in after the car in front of him let someone in. In a school parking lot, for crying out loud. What a douche.
@@Earthneedsado-over177 Agree with you 100%. How hard would it have been to just let the Infiniti in?
@@mclaybry ohh well you said it right there…he’s driving an Infiniti..I don’t want them in front of my either 😂
I agree. And by posting their videos and thinking their actions were justified it is obvious they have no awareness of how their own behavior could have caused a collision.
2:23 - If you were keeping your distance, you would not have had to have bailed into the breakdown lane. That's not how "keeping my distance" works.
yep he was not paying attention either
my thoughts exactly
He was going WAY to fast for the traffic conditions at hand. “Keeping my distance” my ass
4:34 I can't help but feel like, had the white truck hit you, you would have outright blamed the escape driver as well at the other driver for "not giving you room to escape (no pun)", but you would COMPLETELY fail to mention your own following too close was the main cause of it all.
You punned on purpose and it was a good one. Own it.
@@steveleslie2170 🤣🤣🤣👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿
Yeah, my thought after reading the description was "or, don't follow so close so you have room to brake".
Not to mention the super slow response time. Clearly not paying attention, the brake lights in front of him come on almost a full 2 seconds before he slows down and swerves.
I see most of these drivers and they straight up drive with EXTREME entitlement. Like yes I know they’re supposed to stay in their lane but NOTHING but the law and a few paint keeps cars in their lane and 90% of people don’t obey either! Be defensive! Every accident except rear end collisions are avoidable!
8:12 "I've got a dash cam so when someone attempts a proper lane change, I speed up so I can be a douche nozzle and exclaim how every other driver is bad"
Not to mention probably blowing his horn (no sound) and flashing his brights which is probably illegal.
Normally I'd agree with what you're saying, but I have a couple issues..
1. It doesn't appear that the cammer actually sped up, their speed seems pretty consistent.
2. The truck doesn't need to change lanes because by the time they do actually change lanes there's nobody in front of them. So what's the point?
3. A "proper" lane change would mean that they change lanes, turn their blinker off, turn it back on and then change lanes again. The cammer may have thought they just accidentally left their blinker on after moving into the middle lane, which is why it's unsafe to change multiple lanes with one continuous blinker.
@VVoOꟻF It really seems like the cammer did use their brakes, since you know, there wasn't an accident.
@VVoOꟻF Thanks for clarifying! Cheers.
5:09 CO Rev Stat § 42-4-605 (2016) (b) When a yellow lens is illuminated with rapid intermittent flashes, drivers of vehicles may proceed past such signal and through the intersection or other hazardous location only with caution.
That white truck was already there. Cammer did not proceed with caution.
Yup, Blinking yellow light is treated like a YIELD, Flashing red is treated like a STOP. And no lights at all (where there should be) is also an all-way stop. I do with more people knew that.
Yup, there was plenty of room for that truck, cammer could have handled it better...
These always seem to get people, truck should have checked to see if cross traffic had blinking red or yellow. Cammer easily could’ve given truck room, but ultimately the trucks turn could be considered failure to yield right of way as the truck had flashing red.
@@Kirk3919 It looked like a big intersection. It looked like the truck was already making the turn before the other car was even close to the intersection. The truck drivers mistake is assuming the cammer had any common sense.
@Falcon only the turn lanes had flashing red. Still camer was at fault due to not yielding to the truck already in lane before he crossed the intersection.
5:02 **sigh** no, you where an impatient idiot and he had his signal on the entire time, why would you not wait for him to get out of the lane?
I was coming into the comments to say the same thing. Just share the road with other drivers.
@@langlebl Same here. From the other driver's perspective: the lane is clear, it's better to be in the slow lane, you've got a vehicle that's hard to drive...
4:57 - cammer clearly tried to overtake him while he had his turn signal on and was changing lanes...
Its just amazing the lack of self awareness also when calling him a "road owner". Like obviously YOU (cammer) are the person who thinks they "own the road", you could of just hit your brakes but instead you sped up and broke traffic laws.
Tbf, the cammer probably couldn't see the signal at all before moving over. Camera could, due to its positioning.
@@vibingwithvinyl he should have been all the way in his own lane before trying to pass he might have seen the turn signal then.
Undertake on right, and overtake on left.
Undertake is illegal in some states/countries.
@@vibingwithvinyl it blinks on the rear of the truck, and they should have seen it, either way, not excuse for how they handled it.
7:30 Other driver signals, they still have a broken white line, and rather than being nice the cammer decides to be a jerk and create a dangerous situation when they could've just slowed down and let the other driver in. Common courtesy isn't so common anymore, it's no wonder there are so many accidents, raging incidents, and cammers that feel like they have something to prove. Get over yourselves.
Agreed, I was about to comment to see if anyone else noticed it
7:22 You my friend , and i use that term sarcastically, are and arse. You could have easily backed off and let him in and gained a little karma, BUT NO you had to accelerate , (yes you can you can see it and his turn signal on) and jam him, and the people up behind you that now have to deal with consequences of your Ars holiness. You just couldn't stand for him to get in front of you and that is the real reason, and you submitted the video to try to justify your actions. Sorry I call BS.
Agreed. Traffic was flowing well and the person wasn't trying to cut in front. Cammer should have swallowed some pride and let the other person over.
If the cammer's pride is at stake for that type of legal and safe merge, he needs to get off the road.
5:04 no, seems like you were tailgating and didnt give him the 2 seconds he needed to get to the so you passed on the right, get over urself and be patient.
That was my thoughts exactly.
"Forced me into the emergency lane" He was clearly behind the trailer and could have just switched back to the left lane to pass. The cammer is an idiot.
Besides the guy was already moving over when they started undertaking and chose to undertake on the shoulder. There was plenty of time to slow down rather than trying to force their way through. There's a reason undertaking is illegal in many countries and states and that's because of idiots like terry
Also there wasn't another car anywhere in sight. Get out of the left lane...
@@brianstark1067 so on city streets its improper to be in the left lane? It didnt look like a highway with the slow speeds they were going.
#15 Terry, if you're going to complain about anything complain about the trailer lights not working. "Road owner" had his signal on and was getting out of your impatient way.
5:55 To be fair, the polite thing to do in those situations is to let those people in in an alternating fashion, which is what I'm sure the Infiniti driver was expecting to happen and then you just cut them off.
@Falcon It's called being polite as to the heavy traffic. Something you are probably not aware of.
@@clinte7590 yeah, it’s the polite thing to do. But you’re not legally obligated to do it. Since it can and more than likely will cause a bigger backup in the right of way lane.
Cammer 💯 should have let the driver in I would have done the same thing
@@clinte7590 It's called driving within the law. The fact that the Infiniti driver behaved the way they did shows me they are entitled as hell. There is NO legal obligation for me to let them in. Let's trade paint, insurance will rule in my favor and their day will be hella inconvenienced.
@@IKhanNot I was thinking an overly entitled mom picking her kid up from the school and assumes someone needs to let her in every time!
4:54 He had the blinker on and started changing lanes before you tried to undertake.
When are people going to learn blinker doesn’t give you the right away it is let me know where you’re going
@@Misshighness444He was behind the trailer, they both started changing lanes at the same time. Having a fragile ego and anger management issues should land you in jail for endangering lives with a 3000 lbs box of steel. Trying to somehow excuse that, when car accidents are a leading cause of deaths and injuries and property damage is... puzzling
@@Misshighness444 It does when there was no other vehicle there when they started the lane change.
@@Misshighness444 your lack of situational awareness is mind boggling.. the trailer had a signal on and a clear lane before cammer switched lanes and on 2 lane highways you're supposed to pass on the left lane. If the cammer waited 2 seconds the trailer would have moved over to the right and he could have passed in his current left lane..
Only assholes pass on the right lane on a 2 lane highway
2:35 I'm impressed at how many things the cammer did wrong. Bitches, then flashes lights, moves left instead of braking, stops in the middle of two lanes, then says it pulls right because the left tire is destroyed. He's got my vote for worst driver in North America.
4:41 unless you're driving a semi or a truck and trailer there really isn't a reason to take a right turn from the left lane🤷
5:54 if you're in the line to pick up your kids and the person is trying to cut line, then I get the cammer's aggravation. But if they already have their kids and you're trying to leave the parking lot, then allowing a person to pull out isn't going to cost you but a few seconds...
Exactly. It's like the cammer didn't have any courteous to others. Its like holding the door open for someone.
Cammer is a self-righteous prick. I wish he had spoken to that sherriff he mentions just so the sherriff would laugh in his face.
@@condorboss3339 Well where the law is concerned the Infiniti driver must yield.
4:30 Who cares what the guy in the Escape was doing. You were following too close to the other to react to them slowing down. But i'm sure the made up story about the phone makes you seem like a better driver.
My favorite cammer excuse is "The person in front of me didn't leave me enough room to brake."
And who cares that he was "old"?
4: 19 - He didn't, "slam on the brakes for no reason." You were tailgating and almost caused a pileup.
So many cammers in this episode pissed me off. Based on my purely unscientific analysis, most of these episodes break down about 60/40 cammer is right vs cammer is wrong. This one seems more like 30/70.
The clip at 7:30 was my personal favorite. Absolutely no good reason not to let the other vehicle merge.
This compilation is particularly egregious. Not only were the cammers bad, their descriptions were so oblivious to their bad driving and just blamed everyone else.
@@SaroDantra He got an F in Defensive Driving School.
04:50 Says that's not good and keeps on driving away from the accident
First video clip I've seen of the camera car doing a hit and run. Well, maybe a hit and walk.
chea lol
he was turning into a parking lot, so probably stopped there. his comment did make me lol tho
8:10 Me: sees car with signal on up ahead and get off the gas to give him space and time to get over cause it isn't THAT BIG A DEAL.
You: not so much . . .
I agree with the cammer that the lane change was pretty awesome lol
2:49 - That was incredibly poorly handled. First, instead of slowing down (which you had ample need to do), you moved over and slammed into a chunk of concrete. You had time to hit the horn, and you had time to hit the brakes. Then you swerved and got rear ended. Then you sat in the right lane, not moving off to the side of the road. Completely avoidable.
5:58 - Why would you "tell the campus 'sheriff'" because someone flipped you off? That's incredibly petty.
How are you supposed to move a disabled vehicle?
@@Refort610 There's nothing to indicate it's disabled. But let's say it was/is - why didn't he just move to the side of the road with the momentum? There was plenty of it. The cammer said it was pulling to the right, and it's very clear he stepped on the brakes hard.
At 2:49 even if he had braked his brakes could've locked up and then he smashes into the rear of the car, if you look really closely he had NO time to react at all
@@noahbrecker1129 He had MORE than ample time to see what was going on as he had time to both honk his horn and flash his lights. The issue was he didn't hit the brakes at all. Also, there's this thing called ABS that has been around for 30+ years (which the Ford Escape has), so "locked up" brakes isn't even a thing in this case. The more I see this video, the more I'm of the opinion the driver should lose his license. That was pure incompetent driving.
@@neilbradley completely false. There was only about 2-3 seconds when it was apparent that the SUV was moving into the left lane. There are 2 lanes and no reason for them to immediately get into the left lane
But the comment from the cammer said the vehicle was disabled and pulling to the right
Video #13 4:25 Brandon R. - Right from the start of your video it is evident you are following too closely. You are following less than 1 second behind the the SUV in front of you. Don't blame the other drivers even though they had slowed for a reason that doesn't make sense. You need to be ready for traffic to stop for any reason. The best way to do that is give yourself 2 to 4 seconds of following time. You were lucky the white SUV driver missed hitting you. ILR Car Control School
5:22 - No. Yellow means caution. And one would definitely want to be cautious around a light that is not working properly.
In Canada (last time I checked), flashing ambers at an intersection are effectively the same as a four-way stop.
@Falcon Flashing yellow means slow down and make sure the intersection is clear. The other guy was already almost completely through, if they crashed the cammer would be found at fault.
We don't know what the other signal was tho, I don't encounter a flashing yellow where I live but can't imagine one side would be flashing red (stop sign) and the other is flashing yellow... I would see flashing red and assume all lights are the same. Seems you should treat flashing yellow like a yield sign and only go through if it's clear (which it wasn't in this instance).
@Falcon Fair enough, I missed the flashing red part. Still though, a whole bunch of "not payin' attention" going around.
@@zadtheinhaler The cammer was paying attention, not sure why you are saying that. Obviously he slowed and went around the pickup, so he must have been paying attention to something. The cammer acted like a baby, but he still wasn't necessarily wrong. This is so cut and dry, I'm not even sure why it's being argued.
As I now know, WAY too many people think that flashing red one way and flashing yellow the other means it’s a four way stop. Flashing yellow just means caution, you have the right of way and watch out for anyone that thinks yellow means stop.
Flashing red is treated like a 4 way stop sign flashing yellow is treated like yield signs only yield when there’s traffic on your right you don’t have to stop just proceed with caution. I swear people are stupid they see the traffic lights flashing and think they are broken and they are not they go into flash mode at times of day when traffic is light so you are not sitting at a light cycle forever
I honestly didn't know this. Now I'm wondering how many times I was the ass
You don't have the right of way. The others are supposed to yield the right of way. But you're never not at fault if you could have stopped and didn't, because the law never gives you the right of way.
What if it’s a traffic light that is knocked out from a storm is it not supposed to be treated like a 4 way stop?
@@bowhuntinfool9440 Inoperative signals that don't light at all are treated like 4 way stops. So are flashing reds at all corners. John Doe said it correctly above.
2:37 I count five seconds of free time for you to slow down properly, but no you make the idiotic decision to keep the hammer down and go off roading
Exactly, he had time to flash high beams and honk instead of getting on the brakes, then went all drama-queen about it immediately afterward. Meanwhile the passenger noticed everything first and kept a cool head.
1:22 That is the silliest designed intersection I've ever seen. Three-way stop with the uncontrolled "thru-lane" a 90 degree left turn in an intersection that looks and appears to be a 4-way stop -- of course you're going to have confused motorists! Either make a 4-way stop or redesign the intersection so it's clear that the left turn has precedence.
we have one of these also, but the other stop signs are 'marked' with a note stating that traffic from that direction does not stop....
@@grimmster111 Most of the stop signs are indeed marked that way (Incoming traffic does not stop) For some reason that stop sign doesn't but the other 2 stop signs on that intersection does.
@@grimmster111 You're working on the assumption that people can read, or would take the vast amounts of time required to do so.
Or just open your eyes and pay attention to road signs and your surroundings
There are some intersections in a town around here where there are four approaches but only three stop. The stop signs have a '3-way' plaque, but no direct indication of which approach doesn't stop. So you get to check for which side has no sign. Even then, I've had a couple close calls coming from the no-stop approach. The current set-up is (a) asking for trouble, and (b) completely unnecessary in the first place. Why do we need a horde of stop signs on minor city streets? Just use yield signs like the rest of town...
2:20 "I was keeping my distance" - obviously not since you had to bail onto the shoulder.
#8 2:39 so you had time to blow your horn and flash your lights but not to brake? very avoidable accident.
Yeah, if that person didn't dive into the left lane it wouldn't have happened. It looks like they barely accelerated to enter the highway so the cammer did not have enough time to slow down enough
Due to low slow the other vehicle was going there was about a 2 second distance between the cammer and the black SUV. Not enough time to slow down
Was there even a vehicle in front of the black suv that darted into the left lane?
@@sarahburney5396 no wide open....
@@brysonrodden5112 I don't know why you keep perpetuating this, but it's false, man. 168 Foot stopping distance from 70-0 in a Ford Escape, which takes 2.3 seconds. If he had time to flash his lights and honk his horn, he could've hit his brakes. The truth is he didn't even try. Not sure why you keep ignoring that fact.
@@neilbradley I think he might be the cammer lol.
4:27 - the only person who messed up is that cammer - by not maintaining their lane because she was not paying attention to the car in front of her.
Also following little too close to the car in front of them.
" _It's not my fault_ !" - The cry of the entitled cammer.
I only watch these videos for the cammers who are clearly doing something dumb but blame everyone else. Also the comments pointing it out are always good
4:33 He hit his brakes because he was getting too close to the car in front of him. (hint, hint)
4:53 do you know how difficult it is to haul a trailer like that? The dude was moving over to the right when you decided to pass them on the right so what the hell are you blaming him for?? Saying he owns the road he was getting out of the way started to the right lane before you did and then you pass them in the emergency lane like an idiot.
Nice compilation! Thanks for sharing!
Watching these videos has helped me become a smarter, safer and more alert driver. If you got kids that are new drivers or are about to be I suggest making them watch these videos
05:08 #14 A flashing yellow traffic signal light warns you to “PROCEED WITH CAUTION.” Slow down and be alert before entering the intersection. Yield to any pedestrians, bicyclists, or vehicles in the intersection.
The cammer is at fault here, as he clearly didn't proceed with caution!
That's only partially true. The flashing red is to be used as you would a stop sign, the truck that turned is only suppose to enter the intersection when it's clear and he could obviously see the other vehicle approaching, same as if you were turning from a side road with a stop sign onto a road that was through traffic. He should have slowed down as soon as he saw the truck turning but if they had collided the truck that was turning would most likely be found at fault or at least for the majority of it.
It's amazing the number of people who will yell "I had the right of way!" The law never gives you the right of way. It only tells other people to yield to you.
It was flashing red in the white pickup's direction. So the pickup should've stopped and not proceeded until it was clear. So the cammer isn't wrong at all. But, he was being a baby about it.
@@kenlompart9905 You don't know what the truck driver could obviously see. It looked like a big intersection to me so he started his turn before the cammer was close to crossing. Then we have the cammer thinking the truck would not stay in the left lane as he is required to do.
@@mexicanspec Are you blind? The truck driver couldn't have had a clearer view of the cammer heading toward him, it all comes down to the truck driver having the flashing red which means it's his fault if he doesn't wait till the intersection was clear before proceeding plain and simple.
I value your editing, captions and content. Thank you.
4:34 that's what happens when you follow the 0.5 second rule for following distance.
5:12 Blinking yellow means you have the right-of-way; it also means slow down, and it doesn't mean ENGAGE RAGE MODE at all dude. 🤷
It also means "Caution"
Flashing yellow means proceed with caution
@@kgb4187 Exactly right! Not do 50 MPH and cut people off, of course!
I'm going to assume alll lights were flashing yellow, so as to have everyone entering the intersection take note it is uncontrolled, no way they would have one way yellow and another red, at least by common sense reasoning.
@Dunder Mifflin Point taken, probably should be all red considering, what says those with a flashing red are aware of the other direction having only a flashing yellow ? Perhaps they simply assume it's a 4 way, especially if they are unfamiliar with the intersection, meh either way one should be alerted to slow if not stop and expect the unexpected. Persoanlly i don't think i have ever seen a 4 way intersection with differing flashing lights, especially a main artery. But then i don't live everywhere and laws /rules differ.
4:30 cammers fault. going to fast to keep a safe distance and blindly swerved and almost caused a crash
Certified Gold!!!!!
1:50 - I would love to see the preceding footage...
dont think it would have excused the dark red pickup trucks action
@@rogerw-interested agreed but it might provide context.
Agreed. It almost looks like the cammer had just moved into the left lane, assuming to pass the semi as it moved to the right lane, but also possibly to block the dark red pickup from passing if he had been following too closely. Dark red truck likely at fault, either way.
“Plus it’s the Bronx”😂
7:26 JUST LET THEM MERGE DUDE 😂😂😂😂
Right? Unless, of course, the cammer has a medical condition where he'll literally die if he drives considerately...
@Falcon I take your point, but:
• The other driver was indicating.
• There appeared to be enough space to merge (if the cammer allowed it).
• The other driver didn't force his way in.
• There was limited road left to merge.
I totally agree that avoiding idiots and conflict is the way to go, but I feel like in this case, the person trying to merge was not acting inappropriately.
@Falcon Thanks for taking the time to respond, I appreciate it.
Just to clarify; on your point 2 I only said "there appeared to be space" because I know dash cams make things look further away than they are and "if the cammer allowed it" because he appeared (at least to me) to speed up to block the other vehicle.
I guess we have a different take on this one, still nice to engage in civil dialogue with someone who holds a differing opinion. Seems to be a dying art!
@Falcon Has it ever occured to you this person may not of been familiar with the area ? They only realized they needed to turn when they did ? Instead of being a complete ass on the road, how about people only treat those like the cammer as assholes, the SUV wasn't trying to pass anyone, they simply didn't realize their turn was coming up abruptly by the looks of it. So happy the cammer got to assert their authority on the road though, what a hero.
@Falcon Of course, but i've caught myself pushing it as well, not out of malice or my rage, it's simply a reaction that occurs, in this instance it was close but in honesty there was time if one isn't being a complete jerk, but you go ahead and defend the guy that has no courtesy at all, we share the road, no one is perfect, we all make mistakes from time to time, hopefully when and if i do someone without road rage warrior characteristics isn't next to me and prevents my stupidity from harming them or others. i've saved some people and had others save me as well, defensive driving is a thing.
4:57 “Forced me to the emergency lane”. Get over yourself. There’s a pedal to the left of the accelerator pedal “Terry the road owner”.
3:11 Just a minor point. There would have been much less damage to your vehicle if you would have stayed in your lane and let the Explorer hit you. Swerving to an unknown area usually causes more damage. If they had not rear ended you, it would have been 100% your fault.
Did the crammer, say he break checked someone, bit confused how his insurance paid out to him, if that's the case. Unless I miss read the post?
@@almatt21 You misread it. He said the other driver thought he was brake checking her, however that was not the case.
5:56 "Didn't bother telling the campus sheriff" Yea, because he or she would've done anything about it. That made me laugh out loud.
Bad driver: drives bad
Cammer: let me show you how it's done
0:57 ok that late swerve was kinda impressive! and we did it in a mini van! he is lucky he did not hit someone
Ohh yeah hes very lucky !! How are you doing ?
5:05 A blinking yellow light DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT OF WAY at any intersection!!! It's either yield or treat it as if it is a four-way stop. In this case, all directions were blinking. Both drivers should have yield and then proceeded with caution.
Where I'm from, in driver's education, they tell you if your light is blinking yellow, you have right of way. Typically the other light is blinking red, meaning treat it as a stop sign. If they're all blinking red you all treat it as a stop sign. But it very well could be different everywhere
@@shaggydabbydoo1468 You can see at 5:08 that the pickup has a blinking red light. The cammer had the right of way at this intersection.
@@kevinkaaz7720 yea thats what I thought I saw when watching it. I was like wait a minute 🤣
4:56 Why, cammer, did you ignore the turn signal on that vehicle? They had initiated the lane change and you jammed your vehicle where they wanted to go. They were not the "road owner".
Hey Terry (video 15)...the "road owner" had his turn signal on and was making sure the lane was clear. Maybe if you weren't so impatient and determined to cut them off, you wouldn't have had to go into the shoulder. I've said it a million times...people would rather be "right" than safe.
1:50 - definitely an avoidable accident. Don’t be this driver!
4:36 - not sure you gave the white SUV an option to move.
1:50 Totally agree! If dipshit in pickup truck had waited just 2 seconds he could have merged behind the cammer and life goes on
@@TruthHurtsFAFO Obviously the guy in the red pickup could not afford those 2 seconds considering that he was on his way to perform emergency heart transplant surgery.
8:25 I checked the intersection on google maps street view and its only a 2 way stop. But yes the blue mazda failed to stop.
4:05 - Thumbs up for the Skynyrd
3:46 not trying to further bash you or anything, but whenever I pull up to a stop sign I'm not familiar with, I look for all the other stop signs to determine who all stops (if it's not already posted on the sign as I stated before).
Also driver did not follow proper dash cam etiquette. Never admit fault when uploading. THE OTHER CAR WAS SPEEDING!!! 🤣
Even if it's a four way stop - I don't proceed until I can see that the other driver(s) are going to stop.
4:35 stop tailgating then, cammer.
1:43 is a textbook example as to why you don’t pass on the right
All cammers have 3 things in common:
1. They refuse to brake first
2. They prefer waste time slamming the horn than avoiding or evading an accident
3. They are always right
🙄😒
Naah, only the cammers getting in accidents on these videos. I've had a dashcam for years and have never been in an accident (though plenty of close calls). Its just the idiots with cameras that aren't smart enough to know not to blast their content on youtube for everyone to see their bad decisions.
the cammer @3:34 admitted it was her fault. which is rare
Yeah, not all cammers. But idiot drivers fit those three items pretty well, camera or not.
Been watching for a few years.. great videos always!!! Thanks
4:40 who is so absolutely stupid and turns right from the leftmost lane without even using the turn indicator....?!?!
Nice video
2:53 when you couldn’t hold it in anymore
1:49 is it just me, of did the red cammer truck seem to speed up RAPIDLY right before impact?
good possibility, good eye
I saw that, too. It also looked a bit like he had just moved into the left lane. Wondered if it was to pass the semi as it moved to the right lane or if it was to block the dark red pickup from jumping in front of him.
Doesn’t matter, cammer is in the PASSING LANE and since the semi moved over, you have to ACCELERATE in the PASSING LANE to pass. Quit trying to victim blame!
2:35 It really doesn't appear the cammer tried to slow down. He felt flashing his lights and honking was more important. The clip starts off with the merging SUV's signal already on. Looks like another case of the cammer just not wanting someone in front of them.
There are two lanes, the other vehicle did not need to dive over to the left lane immediately. They should have waited until the cammer passed and then moved over. A signal does not give right of way, cammer had the right of way. It looks to me that the cammer saw the signal but it looked like they were moving from the on-ramp to the right lane and it wasn't noticable that the SUV really wanted the left lane until about a 2-3 second distance. With the speed difference between the two there was no way the cammer could slow down in time
@@brysonrodden5112 The cammer should have braked hard first, instead of bailing to the left. It's a common theme in dash cam videos, do anything other than brake, first. Better to hit the Explorer square in the rear, imo., All this dodging and swerving often does, is make matters worse, imo.
@@bills6093 it's definitely, most of the time it is a bad idea to swerve but would have been a very hard impact as there wasn't much time to react after the SUV started to enter the left lane
@@brysonrodden5112 Probably should have already anticipated the Explorer's move, and slowed down when coming up on the line of cars merging.
@@brysonrodden5112 8 seconds from the video starting to the lane change. That's a pretty damn long time. Cammer either wasn't paying attention or is just an ass, or both.
Just here for the breaks, not the brakes.
Never disappointed
I like balled tires.
@@donnash5813 😂😄
6:47
Driver, that's precisely why you don't be courteous while driving. Keep the traffic moving.
Your actions might be kind, however you'll cost them or you when they are involved in an accident from you trying to be courteous.
It's not worth it.
Alot of these cammers complain about people who think they own the road, then send in a video of them getting "cut off" by someone changing lanes, when in reality, they speed up so the person cant come over. Ironic
4:02 accidents are accidents but if you hit me drunk with my child in the car, I’ll get charged gladly with assault.
And end up in jail. Sure, your kid don't need ya.
Another entertaining video. 👍❤🇺🇸
3:20 the dashcammer wanted to hit him so bad lmao
That was me, also no I did not want to hit him at all. Although it would have been his fault if there was an accident.
*Tires screeching* "There's my headphones!"
2:44 Another DB cammer. You see traffic entering, you see the guy's coming over, so you flash your lights and drive onto the shoulder. Wrong answer. I'll take "when to use the brakes" for $400 Alex.
There are 2 lanes, no need to shoot over to the left lane for no reason. Looks like they did not accelerate at all to enter the highway.
But get this... You have both hands AND feet so it is very easy to hit the brakes and honk/flash high beams. That is supposed to warn the other vehicle to move to the right because there was not enough time to slow to the speed of the other driver
@@brysonrodden5112 Just because the driver didn’t have to shoot over to the leftmost lane, doesn’t mean the cammer didn’t have more than enough time to slow down.
Instead they flashed their high beams like Dave mentioned and just went for it
@@andrew2863 they did not speed up. From the cammers POV it looks like they are only merging into the right lane until about a 2-3 second distance from the black SUV. That is not enough time to slow down enough.
@@andrew2863 This is not the cammers fault in anyway shape or form, some cammers are retarded. Not this one. Explorer had NO reason to go in the left lane in that moment, didn't check blind spots, and ran cammer off the road, then rear ended him again.
Stop the cammer hate, and use some sense.
@@brysonrodden5112 we wouldn’t know because the cammer clearly didn’t even *attempt* to use the brakes.
The merging car takes the bulk of this, but the cammer could have avoided this.
First one, the other car caused the cammer to have to stop. The cammer's speeding and lack of paying attention caused him to drive off the road. He was going 37 mph in a 25 mph residential area, and according to the speed at the bottom, he didn't start slowing down until he reached the other car (his speed actually went up from 36 to 37 mph). If he wasn't speeding and was paying attention he could have just hit the brakes and stopped with more than enough time.
I agree the cammer needed to brake but why the hell does the other car need to change lanes? No one is in front of them.
GPS speed is not accurate when accelerating and decelerating. It does not update the second it changes as it is the time in-between two points so it lags a bit
1:35 they really need an "incoming traffic does not stop" sign.
Most signs do, but that one didnt. Every single interchange coming off the road into the shopping center is like this. I hate it, because its confusing and its right off 77 so we have a lot of people who don't really know how it works or read the signs
@Falcon Thought that was self-evident since the cammer is the "incoming traffic". But yeah.
4:19 Typical south Texas / north Mexico. Driving on the left, passing on the right. Absolutely clueless about the rules of the road.
I'll never understand the 'gentle drivers' who puts everyone in danger just to be kind to terrible drivers. If they want to cut through or enter a solid lane, it means they are wrong.
It depends sometimes you can see that their bumpers already scraped up and you know they won't care if they hit you
@@ChutneyGames yup
.... When someone uses a turn signal AND YOU SPEED UP... YOU are the F*CKING problem.
The one with the flashing yellow lights, have to correct him, does not mean you have the right of way, means to proceed with caution.
He still has the right away over someone who has a red blinking light which means they are required to stop and can not go til it's safe for them to go.
1:25 is the kind of intersection that causes accidents because of piss poor design. Who puts stop signs on 3 of the corners and leaves the 4th open? That's asking for trouble.
It honestly does, its a shit show to drive through
5:45 There are cars lined up to leave in each perpendicular aisle. The ironic thing is that the cammer probably came from one of those lines but once they were in the main line, they own the road and no one else gets to come in.
5:19 I do miss my WRX when you had to go 😂
"blinking yellow means I have right of way!" No it doesn't, it means you SLOW DOWN and prepare to STOP. The truck was already in the intersection before you got there meaning it was *HE* who had right of way and not you. Just because you have what sounds like a sports car, doesn't mean you own the road.
Yep they're basically 4 way yield signs
The truck had a red light which means he is suppose to use that as a stop sign. He isn't suppose to come out til it's safe for him to do it. The cammer does have the right away over those that have to stop at a red light. The cammer still should have slowed down and just changed lanes to avoid it, but that doesn't mean he doesn't have the right away.
Video #7 2:22 Billie B. - you may thought you were "keeping your distance from the black SUV" but in fact you were following too closely. You were only about 1 second behind that SUV. If you had been following at a safe distance, you would not have needed to drive off the road to miss hitting the SUV. Next time give yourself about 2 to 4 seconds of following time and you won't need to take to the shoulder to miss hitting the vehicle in front. ILR Car Control School
wow thought the second one was ice cream truck lol
07:23 You can clearly see that the driver of the Honda is blinking on the right and wants to change lanes. What is the camera doing? "No, I'm driving here! I'm not letting you in. And now I'm even accelerating. I'm so important!" That's what you call reckless driving. Here, it's not the Honda that's the stupid one, but the camera.
I feel like this is a consequence of the momentary switch in the blinker stalk. It allows you to get 3 blinks for a lane change, but is that REALLY enough? In a case like this, the cammer COULD have seen the 3 blinks and thought the driver had changed their mind. My car has the same feature (as do most late-model vehicles I think) but in this situation I would engage the blinker fully until I make the lane change. If I was in the Honda's position I also would have tried to make sure I was in the correct lane sooner. Fault could be placed on both parties for what happened.
@@mikeL5183 What the Honda driver could have done is one thing. This is about the current situation, not about what he could have done. We don't know what the traffic situation was before. If he wasn't from the area, maybe he was surprised by the fact that the exit was already right there. Besides, there is a truck on his right. One can well imagine that the Honda driver has seen that the camera does not slow down despite blinks and therefore deactivates it again. Or he is just a prick, who knows. Just the fact that both right tires were over the line would signal to me, "hey, he wants to get in my lane" and then I'll let him in. I lose nothing of my pride.
5:07 when does a yellow not mean caution, it seems when its flashing. seems thats light signal code for barge on thru. while he handled it good, his attitude was wrong
i would slow down more than what the cammer did tho
4:41 just kept driving like nothing happened... great.
4:30 Sorry missy, he didn't 'slam on his brakes for no reason', he did it because the guy ahead of him slowed down...unlike you.
Read more carefully - the guy who "slammed on his brakes for no reason" was the one in front (2 in front of cammer). Doesn't excuse the cammer for following too closely, though.
I'm turning now. Good luck everyone!!
A lot of bad cammers in this one, damn!
Matthew h. Your video shows the ford at the stop sign before you. Looking then moving on. Whilst you don't stop at the stop sign and just go straight through and turn left.
Actually, if you go back and watch the video. Traffic coming in does not have a stop sign, the sign shown to the right of the road way states "Keep Moving". So it doesn't matter when the ford got to the stop sign.
He doesn't stop because there is no stop sign for him. He has the right away to continue on no matter how long those others has been waiting.
a sizeable portion of these seem to be caused by the murican road design/ traffic laws
2:40 - Goodbye tires and bushing, nevermind goodbye car.
0:50 OMG I know EXACTLY where that is! That exit is always changing due to construction and it always causes traffic due to people being confused about where the exit is and they do shit like that.
So many cammers in this video (and many others I've seen) piss me off. Just let people over. Intentionally blocking them is rude and can result in an accident.
Ya'll notice how there are so many of the videos taken by cars in the left lane? Are they parked out there, or is it just a coincidence? I wonder if there's a correlation.