*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/iaf--c3ZUWc/видео.html *👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6 *👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
good for you. sitting their watching your god video in your armchair. reality is he did NOT do anything wrong. no fault conveys. he was not negligent legally or morally. maybe it will help him with experience next time but inexperience does not equal fault. FACT is the car pulled out failing to yield mere MOMENTS before the truck got their. fault lies with the car. Period. the CORPORATION does not want to absorb fault hence why they tried to shift blame convey fault. THE LAW correctly recognized all fault lies with the failing to yield car and that the cammer DID try to take action even if it was the wrong action. there was no negligence in that choice so no FAULT conveys. 100% fault of the intruding car was the correct legal and moral choice.
@@nerys71 He did not say he was at fault, he said it was avoidable, which it was. He had a full 4 car lengths and he was not traveling at a rate of speed that would have kept him from hitting the brakes, thus avoiding the collision all together.
@@dcrosby386 Avoidable is literally a MEANINGLESS statement. technically "ALL" accidents are avoidable on some level. the issue is negligence. fault. responsibility. it was not 4 car lengths. it was 2.5 seconds 55-60ft or less than 3 car lengths. had that car popped out 1 second sooner you MIGHT have a point. it did not. you do not. he had ROUGHLY 2.5 seconds give or take a quarter second from when it was clear something was happening to when impact occured. reaction time average is 2.3 seconds. not stopping time. REACTION TIME. you then need to add stopping time on top of that. Stopping distance at 25mph is about 55ft. you see the problem yet? its pretty simple math. even if he hit the brakes he PROBABLY would have still hit the car unless he noticed the car exactly at the 2.5s mark which is NOT likely. probably more like the 1.5-2.0 second mark. far too late to be able stop in time. YOU noticed the car right away "I" noticed the car right away. but we are sitting in chairs with perfect vision video and foreknowledge that we ARE going to watch an accident happen. STOP TRYING TO WIN THE INTERNET ARGUMENT AND LOOK AT WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING.
1:55 all those months of trouble and strife, not to mention the potential financial burden of hiring a lawyer, missing work to go to court, having your car in the shop being held until all the here and there was finalized and a check was cut to the shop to start work. ALL because you chose to "prove a point" instead of brake, damn shame.
I was just about to comment that he has more then enough space to brake but refused to do so Im always watching my surroundings when I’m driving these videos help tons
Please not camera make it look farther than it is and there could have been someone behind them. They had little time to react because they pull out from behind parked car
@@yungkidnf if you were in that situation and q car came out from your right side like that would you break out try to swerve. He could have had a car close behind and if he break he still get hit
That's exactly what I was thinking! Why did Enterprise need to pay for him not braking?? I was looking for someone in the comments who thought this too.
CHP on 4:41 had more than enough to determine the driver of the Prime truck. All prime trucks have tracking. All they'd have to had done was to call Amazon.. you have what seems to be the trailer number on the bottom right around 4:13, and the carrier plaque multiple times from 4:15 onwards.
4:20 the importance of having a quality dashcam and not having crap in front of it that can obscure the view. better planning in placing a dashcam is needed
Yep. We see quite a few clips were the cam was obviously some $25 Wal-Mart special. If the offending driver sticks around, it will help prove to the police who was and was not at fault. But if the other party decides that he/she has better things to do than stick around, it's hard to anybody to identify the other vehicle if all your cam recorded was a blur. People should invest in a good quality cam. I personally recommend BlackVue and Vantrue, but there are other high quality ones.
I bought the cheap one figuring the cops would not go after a hit-n-run driver but the image would be good enough to protect me against a liar who stopped or whose car was disable at the site.
Yeeeees, PLEASE place all that on the driver who got hit, instead of commenting on the ACTUAL EVENT of the EMOTIONALLY STUNTED, TWATWAFFLING, MICROPENISED 🤏🏼 NE'ER-DO-WELL Amazon trucker... 🤦🏽♂️
00:02 Cammer honks at driver rolling through stop sign... *while he speeds in a school zone & rolls through the same stop sign* (never mind the 2nd one he rolled through)? Can't make this stuff up!
My first thought: "Is this a police pursuit?" Then my second thought: "how high is this driver?" Then I read the attempt at a description. Now I know my second thought was correct. Every once in a while something comes along here that surprises me!
AFAICT, cammer was attempting to play cop. The semi-literate description seems to say the cammer was not one of the vehicles that 'tapped.' Since the two involved did not seem to care, cammer needs to mind his own business.
@@condorboss3339 the only clear part of their caption attempt is them saying they hit another vehicle and it only damaged the cammer’s car but it was just scratched paint
1:55 Ted, "video was used against you" 🤣 What you meant to say was, you had plenty of time to brake to avoid an accident but chose not to. How many stopped vehicles did you pass? 3? 4?
That white rogue was entering traffic, the cammer legally doesn't have to stop for anyone. It is your job to sit there and wait for traffic to clear, not just assume it's clear. It's not the law for the left lane to stop when the right lane does.
2:30 that was some mad skills for those two cars. Especially the one in a lane that was in front of the camera. Both had the forethought of moving over and the same time.
@@Metabrowser That was a flashing turning light for the cammer so it means they could keep going without stopping as long as it was clear. They didn't roll the stop light at all. They still should have went into the right lane which would have been better though.
1:55 from the video it looks like the cammer initially swerved to avoid, but in an effort to "claim their space" back again swooped around faster than they realized and hit them.
Looks like they did what humans do best. Protect themself which caused him to jerk his car away from the accident then his money hungry self thought I could win some money in a lawsuit and jerk his car back to the accident. It was like the angel on his shoulder lost the battle with the devil on his other shoulder
you people are truly sick. disgusting even. EVERYONE is a greedy SOB out to exert dominance and claim a paycheck from an insurance company. you people are TRULY sick. instinct to swerve. noticed he might hit the soul reaper swerves back in panic to avoid hitting the other car. that's it. the simplest solution is USUALLY the correct solution. you have to convolute that he thought of all of this and executed his villainous plan in 2.5 seconds. sure. yeah. if that makes you sleep better.
@@nerys71 I would have avoided it. This guy thought the SUV was going to move faster so he didn't even bother to slow down. I doubt he wanted to make contact, but I'd rather not have such poor decision-makers on the roads I drive.
@@jefflarson1652 well he has better instincts (from observing the video) than 90% of the drivers out their so ...... not sure what to think of that. Need to start with Driver Training. the United States basically HAS NO driver training or requirements to speak of. Pass a physical, eye exam, a stupid test a chimp could pass, and take a driving test a chimp could damned near pass. Basically NO training. Decision making skills come from training. Very little of it comes from instinct.
@@nerys4557 95% of the drivers would have avoided it. This one assumed the suv would complete their turn and be out of the way so he didn't attempt to slow down. If that's not what he was thinking, then he hit that vehicle on purpose.
Man, the amount of drivers that rather use their horn than their brakes in this video is alarming. One cammer: "Can you believe this footage was used AGAINST me?" Yes, yes I can Another cammer: "They ran me off the road." No, you DROVE off the road instead of slowing down. Another cammer: "They encroached on my lane and eventually cut me off." Sounds like you had plenty of time to react to it beforehand. 🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️
1:54 - dry roads, no attempt at braking, you share some fault and Enterprise's determination should have held. Why are people so shocked that there's some onus on you to drive defensively? Your entitlement in hitting someone who got in front of you is why insurance rates are increasing everywhere
Except that's not how life and reality works. When people take evasive action MOST people make one choice and tunnel vision on that choice. its takes either natural talent or SERIOUS practice/training to overcome this state. This driver elected to swerve. so braking was off the table in the time span available to him to make a choice over what to do. even if he thought of braking it was too late. he had already committed to swerving which he correctly canceled because of the other car. Would braking have saved him? unknown. I am not 100% sure it would have stopped the collision but maybe reduced the damage. swerving only requires moving your arms which area already on the wheel ready to do so. braking requires releasing the gas pedal MOVING your foot and pressing another pedal. contrary to what people in their arm chairs on the internet want to think this takes TIME. People are also CLUELESS as to how "FAULT" works. fault is not about what COULD you have done. its about what you DID do and what you SHOULD have done. NOT MISSING an accident is not a case of fault. it would not add to shift of contribute to the fault of the cammera. 100% of that goes to the person who failed to yield and pulled out in front of another driver period. The only way you can transfer fault to the cammer and the REASON cammer won in court/lawyer is because the cammer was not NEGLIGENT. if the cammer made no attempt at all to avoid and had time to do so maybe. if the cammer was speeding. etc.. IE you would have to show some level of negligence on the part of the cammer IE that he did something "he was not supposed to do or be doing" (speeding on the phone riding in the shoulder ignoring some sort of traffic control etc..) he was not doing any of that. he was otherwise doing everything he was supposed to be doing and doing it properly Mistakenly electing to swerve instead of brake is not negligence. NOT REACTING as fast as you arm chair drivers with god vision video THINK he should have reacted is NOT NEGLIGENCE. now if the car was simply sitting their in his way and he ELECTED to simply "drive into it" then and only then could you say "he did something wrong" and there would be fault to share. in this instance there is NO fault on teh cammer. he did nothing wrong. MAYBE he could have brakes MAYBE he could have reacted faster. those are maybes those are not negligence those do NOT convey fault.
@@nerys71 Are you the driver? Is that why you are defending this clip on every comment? If the driver would have slowed down when he first saw the car come into his lane, then he would not have had to swerve. Completely avoidable.
@@darthbalgarus6986 cammer did less than the bare minimum to attempt to avoid the accident as it was clearly caught on camera, hence why the footage was even used against him in the first place, in most states, that matters.
@@kgb4187 The collision is purely the fault of the white car. If they didn't arrogantly and selfishly make a blind turn then the crash wouldn't have happened
1:54 I agree, you had plenty of time to slow/stop but instead, you tried to maneuver around the vehicle. In that much of a hurry that you can't slow down for a few seconds to allow another car to pull out? 4:41 - don't drive in the blind-spot of another vehicle and then rely on the other driver to 'check their blind-spot' before merging over.
1:52 "Video used against me, believe it or not!" Yes, I totally believe it. You had PLENTY of time to brake. Even if the other person is in the wrong, you have a responsibility to do what you can to avoid an accident. I would bet the reason Enterprise agreed to pay was simply to be done with you.
Yes he failed to take a reasonable precaution; and yes Enterprise gave him a few hundred bucks to make him go away then billed the car renter for it. When I was adjusting I would have ruled 50/50
#26 - I've reported several bus drivers in our local District for that kind of driving. (I also reported one bus that had a diesel leak that was visible on the road. I was acquainted with the bus manager and she was =very= thankful for that one!)
Video #1 0:30 - no one should be chasing another driver through urban streets or anywhere for that matter. This "cammer" technically ran a STOP sign. Any vehicle chase puts innocent people - drivers, pedestrians, cyclists at risk for what? To get a minor crash sorted out. Get your priorities straight. It is not worth the chance of injuring someone else to get a licence plate number. ILR Car Control School
@1:53, it is apparent that the cammer not only had enough time to stop but, that he actually turned his steering wheel to intentionally hit the other vehicle.
4:25 dont brake speed up and use the shoulder on the left to get infront of the semi that clearly doesnt see you next to him and remove that thing swinging infront of the dashcam lol
Are you serious with this advice - speed up and use the shoulder? If so, that is some very dangerous advice. That shoulder is not a smooth paved shoulder from what I see and speeding up in definitely NOT the answer. Speeding up and trying to steer on a soft shoulder is a recipe for disaster! They would be much better off simply slowing down and staying behind the truck. ILR Car Control School
@@carcontrolschool To add clarity I was saying for the driver to speed up prior to the semi merging. It he was driving faster and closer to the black car and not in the blind spot of the semi this could have been avoided to begin with.
@@SiK2tehTouCh That's not the answer either. That would put them too close to the vehicle in front. At the start of the video they are already too close to the SUV in front. The best move would to be slow just enough to not be beside the semi. One of our "rules" in defensive driving is to never drive beside another vehicle whenever possible especially trucks. To be clear, your advice says "use the shoulder on the left..." which is definitely not a wise thing to do. ILR Car Control School
@@beanbag5433 I will not say I’m in the right in that clip, but she had cut thru lanes of traffic causing me to hit her, and she ran I did not see she was chasing someone. But it’s different POV from happening in person to you seeing it in the video when I ran that stop sign I looked to see if it was safe, I will say it was clear does not mean it was right of me.
Interesting how the cammer in the first clip didn't show any video of the claimed 'offense.' Makes me wonder if this was simple road rage on the part of the cammer..
@4:14 it doesn’t matter which insurance carrier you are with. If the damages exceed over the value of the vehicle it’s a total loss. If there’s significant frame damage it’s a total loss. It’s not about which insurance carrier you have. On top of that, you have the option to retain the vehicle.
5:05 Guess all the trucks turning left just be ignoring the open left turn lane? I mean, if you're in a rush, the open lane is probably your best choice.
@@donnash5813 I don't know what jurisdiction you are thinking of, but where I live drivers making a right turn are supposed to enter the rightmost driving lane in the new direction.
@@condorboss3339 You can see other traffic turning at a green arrow so no one else can turn into those lanes so Jeep and cammer can pick their lanes. I do agree and I always turn into the right lane and move over later if I need to do that.
At 8:26 mark...i love how people make illegal turns (not turning into the nearest lane) then complain about getting cut off by someone basically doing what they did. Hypocritical
4:41 the semi can't hear the car horn. Plus Grandma and Grandpa hung out in the hammer lane, They decide to camp in blind spot. Maybe it is time for them to go to the old folks home and crash into wheel chairs
That semi knew very well they were there. He speed up next to them. They were keeping up with the cars in front of them and the semi just came over anyways to just push them out of the way.
8:36 you're not supposed to turn wide in a single turn lane, closest lane, then merge. yes they should use a signal to change lanes, but you're not supposed to be there in the first place.
@@calilee6894 that's simply not the case, you always turn into the nearest lane. for example, right on red (which is a terrible idea in the first place) you're gonna just pull out into the second lane? yeah great way to get you or somebody else killed.
@@calilee6894 no… you always turn into the closest lane. You need to look and single to continue to move over to the others . Imagine when turning right on a red as the above person noted ….
@@cayk9444 Just because a youtube commenter said it doesn't mean its right. 1. its not illegal, in fact, what we're TAUGHT in driving school is to stop at a red light, make sure its clear, and then you can turn into any lane given that it is safe to do so 2. How is it a danger to turn into an empty lane after i make sure its clear? Nobody has brought up a reasonable answer to that. Y'all are the reason the roads are a mess of road rage, getting mad at nothing.
@@calilee6894 uhhh I didn’t agree with them for fun, I agreed with them because they are CORRECT and have common sense and basic defence driving knowledge. Instead of going off your emotions and feelings of what you think is right because you said so, I encourage you to look up traffic laws. Where I live the highway traffic act (section 141) literally says you must turn into the lane “that corresponds to the lane from which the turn commenced”. It’s an $85 fine where I live and points taken off if you do not. Not sure what the heck your driving school was teaching, but I learned to turn into the closest lane, as the law expects where I live (this is also the case in most states with a few exceptions, which could be your state possibly). Regardless, it’s just smart driving whether it is the law in a state or not, especially since there are so many hidden intersections, plazas, and side streets.
8:27 The cammer is also at fault. When turning right, one is supposed to turn into the inside (the lane to the farthest right side), NOT lane slide to the outside left lane. Why is this so hard to COMPREHEND.?
1:55 could’ve been completely prevented had you just simply braked. You had plenty of time to put pressure on your brakes. Is it your first time on the road or something?
1:57 There is some clown named Nerys that is the only guy defending the cammer and he is completely wrong about fault. No one ever found that the cammer wasn't at fault. The cammer hired a lawyer who filed a lawsuit and it was cheaper for Enterprise to settle and pay the repairs rather than hire a lawyer and proceed with litigation. If this case went to trial or subrogation the cammer would be found majority at fault because a reasonable person could have stopped and it appears that the cammer swerved away and then swerved back to hit the other car.
4:17 somewhat predictable but damn shame cammer couldn't speed up or he will be tailgating & it doesn't help the car in front is actually camping in the passing lane
4:54 Nobody ran you off the road. You moving to the left was your choice as there was plenty of room for that car to get in there. Try using your brake pedal next time instead of the steering wheel.
1:22 - The second horn tap was really helpful. 1:58 - Completely avoidable. No onw "filed a lawsuit". That's tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars when all done and that's far beyond the claim $ by a wide margin. No insurance company would do that.
5:04; really hate when there is no information at the end on something so blatantly malicious. 6:56; van driver should have a tattoo on his forehead, "I'm a failure at brake checking"
6:31 Nice to see a clip from my area! (edit) 8:25 and here's another one, not surprised because i've driven in these exact areas and they're notorious for careless drivers
5:07 What an inpatient driver wow, the lights had only just turned green. I’ve had someone beep at me, when the lights had only just turned green. I just beeped back, that’s just way too impatient the driver of the ute, didn’t even give the other driver a chance to get moving
#12 On a two lane road like that, with slower traffic ahead in the right lane, the moment the red semi passed your parents on the right it was obvious what was going to happen. Why would he be speeding up with slow traffic ahead if he wasn't about to cut into the passing lane? I'd advise your parents they need to stay ahead of the semi or drop back and give the semi space to move over. This is to avoid an accident, not defend their right of way.
But but but... The trucker should check his blind spot! People should ride motorcycles for a while or at least watch DanDanTheFireman. Brakes first, horn second. It's my job to anticipate the problems coming.
@@michaellewis6569 I'm not saying the trucker was right to do that. I'm saying that people need to drive defensively. You should drive expecting other drivers to do stupid things. That way before they do the stupid thing you are already prepared to deal with it in a way that doesn't end with you in a crash or run off the road.
Is no one gonna talk about the flordia driver driving with a hood open and instead opting to stick out his head. Because im dying, flordia is a meme but come on this what flordia is built on.
Ok can someone recommend a dashcam? I’m looking to get one but I have no knowledge of the cons and pros. Unsure of the ones I’ve saved on my Amazon list.
4:41 Smail Claims. Sue Amazon for the maximum smail claims you can (varies from state to state - in Michigan it's $5,500). That amount should cover your deductible plus any pain and suffering you may have (even emotional - I still have nightmares from the accident that nearly killed me and that was 6 years ago).
It wouldn't stick since they were in the truckers blindspot (and no, truckers can't check their blindspots as easily as we can in our cars or small trucks) that's why there are signs on the back of semi's and trailers that warns drivers (even with a nifty graphic that shows you) that you shouldn't be there or drive in that area because they can't *see you* and no, drivers shouldn't just outright assume that people are there - if they did that - they'd never get anywhere. Of course, this is now changing, more and more truckers are installing blindspot cameras in order to make it easier to see if someone is being dumb and staying in that area.
@@Suisfonia you have a duty to make sure the lane is clear regardless of what vehicle you're driving. At 4:18, cammer would've been visible in the trucker's blind spot mirror (the one on the nose). At 4:25, trucker should've been able to see cammer in their main side view mirror. And when the cammer was run off the road, trucker would've definitely seen that. Then we have cammer's car horn that trucker completely ignored. Also, it's not dumb to maintain a safe following distance, quite the opposite. If you have a line of traffic in front of and behind you in the left lane, there's a very good chance you have someone beside you. Pop on your turn signal, crack your window and wait a bit. Window is so you can hear a horn, turn signal is to show others what you want to do. As long as I'm not running up on a semi (greater than 20mph difference), I'll them over with a few flashes (high beams during the day, popping headlights on and off during night). This would most definitely stick.
@@Suisfonia they weren't in the truckers blind spot! I swear some of you people got a driver's license out of a cracker Jack box. If they were on the right side then they would have been in his blind spot, but on the left side the driver can see clear down to the back of his trailer. Sometimes look things up before you make a comment on it.
2:55 With so much space in front of them why stay in the blind spot of a 18 wheeler. When they are in the left lane always know they are moving over very soon. I don't ever take any chances next to trucks.
4:20 This is why you don't sit next to a semi on the freeway. Either get next to his cab so he knows you're there or stay back far enough to avoid him if he moves over.
The semi came up to them. The semi knew very well they were there and just didn't care. I would have hunted that person down myself and sue Amazon for that bullshit.
was not expecting to see my apartment in one of these clips skdjfhsd i was like "oh hey that's my city" and then "HEY THAT'S MY APARTMENT" ETA: everyone seems to have trouble with the intersection outside its so funny to watch sometimes but also terrifying no one knows how to turn properly here
4:13 the collision could have been avoided. You had plenty of room on the shoulder and I see you slightly moving over toward the truck. Yes it’s their fault but you could have avoided the damage.
clip 12, 4:17 Lay on your horn, and maintain location, and maintain speed.....is clearly NOT how to handle someone encroaching into your travel lane. Defensive driving skills clearly lacking. Reduce speed, move to the right, and let the truck have the lane since they so clearly want it so desperately. This little passenger car is no match for that 18-wheeler and is going to lose the fight.
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 85 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4dMneMt1NgM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 85 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/tr.png)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 40 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3u13fFQgwf4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 89 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/304zi1fea8M/mqdefault.jpg)
![Eminem - Fuel (feat. JID) [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/t5H_CewqpKA/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 87 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/1.gif)
*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/iaf--c3ZUWc/видео.html
*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6
*👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
Hi
1:55 you had plenty of time to apply pressure on your brakes. It's not that hard.
And he turned into him! “Case used against me believe it or not” uh I can totally believe that and he should’ve been 100% at fault
@@alantaneff5339 I literally just said the same thing in my own comment and read yours. It seems like the cammer wrecked intentionally
And the cammer turned left into the SUV! No wonder it was used against them. What a moron.
1:53 From my view, the cammer is clearly idiotic because simply braking would have avoided the entire issue. Completely avoidable.
Yup
good for you. sitting their watching your god video in your armchair. reality is he did NOT do anything wrong. no fault conveys. he was not negligent legally or morally. maybe it will help him with experience next time but inexperience does not equal fault. FACT is the car pulled out failing to yield mere MOMENTS before the truck got their. fault lies with the car. Period.
the CORPORATION does not want to absorb fault hence why they tried to shift blame convey fault. THE LAW correctly recognized all fault lies with the failing to yield car and that the cammer DID try to take action even if it was the wrong action. there was no negligence in that choice so no FAULT conveys. 100% fault of the intruding car was the correct legal and moral choice.
@@nerys71 He did not say he was at fault, he said it was avoidable, which it was. He had a full 4 car lengths and he was not traveling at a rate of speed that would have kept him from hitting the brakes, thus avoiding the collision all together.
@@dcrosby386 Avoidable is literally a MEANINGLESS statement. technically "ALL" accidents are avoidable on some level. the issue is negligence. fault. responsibility.
it was not 4 car lengths. it was 2.5 seconds 55-60ft or less than 3 car lengths. had that car popped out 1 second sooner you MIGHT have a point. it did not. you do not.
he had ROUGHLY 2.5 seconds give or take a quarter second from when it was clear something was happening to when impact occured.
reaction time average is 2.3 seconds. not stopping time. REACTION TIME. you then need to add stopping time on top of that.
Stopping distance at 25mph is about 55ft. you see the problem yet? its pretty simple math. even if he hit the brakes he PROBABLY would have still hit the car unless he noticed the car exactly at the 2.5s mark which is NOT likely. probably more like the 1.5-2.0 second mark. far too late to be able stop in time. YOU noticed the car right away "I" noticed the car right away. but we are sitting in chairs with perfect vision video and foreknowledge that we ARE going to watch an accident happen.
STOP TRYING TO WIN THE INTERNET ARGUMENT AND LOOK AT WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING.
@@nerys4557 you must be a blast at parties. 😂 Lol
1:55 all those months of trouble and strife, not to mention the potential financial burden of hiring a lawyer, missing work to go to court, having your car in the shop being held until all the here and there was finalized and a check was cut to the shop to start work. ALL because you chose to "prove a point" instead of brake, damn shame.
I was just about to comment that he has more then enough space to brake but refused to do so Im always watching my surroundings when I’m driving these videos help tons
Please not camera make it look farther than it is and there could have been someone behind them. They had little time to react because they pull out from behind parked car
@@tonystank_kick he DIDN'T USE HIS BRAKES, what part of that don't you understand?
@@yungkidnf if you were in that situation and q car came out from your right side like that would you break out try to swerve. He could have had a car close behind and if he break he still get hit
That's exactly what I was thinking! Why did Enterprise need to pay for him not braking?? I was looking for someone in the comments who thought this too.
CHP on 4:41 had more than enough to determine the driver of the Prime truck. All prime trucks have tracking.
All they'd have to had done was to call Amazon.. you have what seems to be the trailer number on the bottom right around 4:13, and the carrier plaque multiple times from 4:15 onwards.
wasnt a prime truck thats amazon an independent contractor
4:20 the importance of having a quality dashcam and not having crap in front of it that can obscure the view. better planning in placing a dashcam is needed
Yep. We see quite a few clips were the cam was obviously some $25 Wal-Mart special. If the offending driver sticks around, it will help prove to the police who was and was not at fault. But if the other party decides that he/she has better things to do than stick around, it's hard to anybody to identify the other vehicle if all your cam recorded was a blur. People should invest in a good quality cam. I personally recommend BlackVue and Vantrue, but there are other high quality ones.
I bought the cheap one figuring the cops would not go after a hit-n-run driver but the image would be good enough to protect me against a liar who stopped or whose car was disable at the site.
Yeeeees, PLEASE place all that on the driver who got hit, instead of commenting on the ACTUAL EVENT of the EMOTIONALLY STUNTED, TWATWAFFLING, MICROPENISED 🤏🏼 NE'ER-DO-WELL Amazon trucker... 🤦🏽♂️
@@Overtake1 we all agree that the Amazon driver is a piece of crap, but that's why you invest in a high quality dash cam.
00:02 Cammer honks at driver rolling through stop sign... *while he speeds in a school zone & rolls through the same stop sign* (never mind the 2nd one he rolled through)? Can't make this stuff up!
My first thought: "Is this a police pursuit?" Then my second thought: "how high is this driver?" Then I read the attempt at a description. Now I know my second thought was correct. Every once in a while something comes along here that surprises me!
AFAICT, cammer was attempting to play cop. The semi-literate description seems to say the cammer was not one of the vehicles that 'tapped.'
Since the two involved did not seem to care, cammer needs to mind his own business.
@@condorboss3339 the only clear part of their caption attempt is them saying they hit another vehicle and it only damaged the cammer’s car but it was just scratched paint
What a intense start to the video
but she may have scratched his car a little!!!
It just brakes my heart that people can't spell breaks.
No kidding- I was watching this while eating my brakefast.
they need to rename this channel 'Break my Brakes' or something so then they really have no excuse
Spelling isn't the issue ;-)
Spewling, punktuatoin and gramma arr the comonion issuez udder tham dering1
It's not just brake vs break. I sometimes wonder if grammar is still taught in school.
1:55 Ted, "video was used against you" 🤣 What you meant to say was, you had plenty of time to brake to avoid an accident but chose not to. How many stopped vehicles did you pass? 3? 4?
Don’t know how he could have missed traffics not moving to his right or the white car which
yeah he's definitely partly at fault! Enterprise probably just wanted to shut him up so they paid, big company they didn't care
That white rogue was entering traffic, the cammer legally doesn't have to stop for anyone. It is your job to sit there and wait for traffic to clear, not just assume it's clear.
It's not the law for the left lane to stop when the right lane does.
No doubt he was 50% fault but my question is why was traffic stopped when the stoplight at the intersection was green?
@@_sc300 it's not the law for me to stop and avoid hitting J-walkers in the middle of the street but I do it anyways.
1:50 is it just me or does it look like cammer tried to prove a point by not braking until the last second, then turned into them as well?
saw that too
That's exactly what they did, then brought a lawyer in to fight their stupid decision.
If you're talking vid 6. Totally agree.
Exactly! And he complained that they found him at fault!
He is absolutely at fault too for accelerating and hitting him on purpose!!
Yes he was at fault
4:40 Good thing you have that pine tree air freshener hanging in front of your camera blocking it. 👏. 👏. 👏.
yes they are all kind of stupid
Maybe it's a stinky camera.
2:30 that was some mad skills for those two cars. Especially the one in a lane that was in front of the camera. Both had the forethought of moving over and the same time.
You could not choreograph stunt drivers better than that.
When you run out of "talent"...
Seriously that was freaking brilliant! Unlike the bums who slam on the brakes for anything those two drove professionally and wisely.
POV:
Sees someone in the middle of the road far ahead of them
Does absolutely nothing to avoid hitting them
Wonders why they're found at fault
Exactly! Then appalled by the video being used against him.
Because right of way...
@@Overtake1 following that logic if a kid runs out in the road I don’t have to stop.
@@Will0398 legally you don’t if they’re jaywalking, morally though, you would stop because who the hell would want to run someone over?
8:27 Jeep gave no signal, but at least he made a turn into the proper lane unlike the cammer
My thoughts exactly when I watched this. The cammer makes an improper turn and then gets upset with another driver's mistake.
I should have figured another fan of the channel would have picked up on this!
Wonder if the cammer used his indicator when he made that turn and went right into the other lane.
@@Metabrowser That was a flashing turning light for the cammer so it means they could keep going without stopping as long as it was clear. They didn't roll the stop light at all. They still should have went into the right lane which would have been better though.
@@sweetgracie1930 Thanks. Did not the flashing green light. Deleted my comment.
Cheers!
1:55 from the video it looks like the cammer initially swerved to avoid, but in an effort to "claim their space" back again swooped around faster than they realized and hit them.
Looks like they did what humans do best. Protect themself which caused him to jerk his car away from the accident then his money hungry self thought I could win some money in a lawsuit and jerk his car back to the accident. It was like the angel on his shoulder lost the battle with the devil on his other shoulder
you people are truly sick. disgusting even. EVERYONE is a greedy SOB out to exert dominance and claim a paycheck from an insurance company. you people are TRULY sick.
instinct to swerve. noticed he might hit the soul reaper swerves back in panic to avoid hitting the other car. that's it. the simplest solution is USUALLY the correct solution.
you have to convolute that he thought of all of this and executed his villainous plan in 2.5 seconds. sure. yeah. if that makes you sleep better.
@@nerys71 I would have avoided it. This guy thought the SUV was going to move faster so he didn't even bother to slow down. I doubt he wanted to make contact, but I'd rather not have such poor decision-makers on the roads I drive.
@@jefflarson1652 well he has better instincts (from observing the video) than 90% of the drivers out their so ...... not sure what to think of that.
Need to start with Driver Training. the United States basically HAS NO driver training or requirements to speak of. Pass a physical, eye exam, a stupid test a chimp could pass, and take a driving test a chimp could damned near pass. Basically NO training.
Decision making skills come from training. Very little of it comes from instinct.
@@nerys4557 95% of the drivers would have avoided it. This one assumed the suv would complete their turn and be out of the way so he didn't attempt to slow down. If that's not what he was thinking, then he hit that vehicle on purpose.
1:54 completely avoidable
yeah. don't pull out in front of oncoming traffic. works wonders.
@@nerys71 lol thank you, what is wrong with people?
Man, the amount of drivers that rather use their horn than their brakes in this video is alarming.
One cammer: "Can you believe this footage was used AGAINST me?" Yes, yes I can
Another cammer: "They ran me off the road." No, you DROVE off the road instead of slowing down.
Another cammer: "They encroached on my lane and eventually cut me off." Sounds like you had plenty of time to react to it beforehand.
🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️
🗣👏🏽All 👏🏽of 👏🏽this 👏🏽here!!
It's every video. Why use brakes?
1:54 - dry roads, no attempt at braking, you share some fault and Enterprise's determination should have held. Why are people so shocked that there's some onus on you to drive defensively? Your entitlement in hitting someone who got in front of you is why insurance rates are increasing everywhere
Right! Clearly a line was formed and you can see the SUV already out... 🙄 super entitled
Except that's not how life and reality works. When people take evasive action MOST people make one choice and tunnel vision on that choice. its takes either natural talent or SERIOUS practice/training to overcome this state. This driver elected to swerve. so braking was off the table in the time span available to him to make a choice over what to do.
even if he thought of braking it was too late. he had already committed to swerving which he correctly canceled because of the other car. Would braking have saved him? unknown. I am not 100% sure it would have stopped the collision but maybe reduced the damage. swerving only requires moving your arms which area already on the wheel ready to do so. braking requires releasing the gas pedal MOVING your foot and pressing another pedal. contrary to what people in their arm chairs on the internet want to think this takes TIME.
People are also CLUELESS as to how "FAULT" works. fault is not about what COULD you have done. its about what you DID do and what you SHOULD have done.
NOT MISSING an accident is not a case of fault. it would not add to shift of contribute to the fault of the cammera. 100% of that goes to the person who failed to yield and pulled out in front of another driver period.
The only way you can transfer fault to the cammer and the REASON cammer won in court/lawyer is because the cammer was not NEGLIGENT. if the cammer made no attempt at all to avoid and had time to do so maybe. if the cammer was speeding. etc.. IE you would have to show some level of negligence on the part of the cammer IE that he did something "he was not supposed to do or be doing" (speeding on the phone riding in the shoulder ignoring some sort of traffic control etc..)
he was not doing any of that. he was otherwise doing everything he was supposed to be doing and doing it properly
Mistakenly electing to swerve instead of brake is not negligence. NOT REACTING as fast as you arm chair drivers with god vision video THINK he should have reacted is NOT NEGLIGENCE.
now if the car was simply sitting their in his way and he ELECTED to simply "drive into it" then and only then could you say "he did something wrong" and there would be fault to share.
in this instance there is NO fault on teh cammer. he did nothing wrong. MAYBE he could have brakes MAYBE he could have reacted faster. those are maybes those are not negligence those do NOT convey fault.
@@nerys71 Are you the driver? Is that why you are defending this clip on every comment? If the driver would have slowed down when he first saw the car come into his lane, then he would not have had to swerve. Completely avoidable.
1:55 yes, I CAN believe it.
How? Cammer didn't do anything wrong and had the right of way. The other driver made a blind turn and is completely in the wrong
@@darthbalgarus6986 cammer did less than the bare minimum to attempt to avoid the accident as it was clearly caught on camera, hence why the footage was even used against him in the first place, in most states, that matters.
@@darthbalgarus6986 Cammer jerked their car towards the accident and had plenty of time to stop if they used the brakes at all
@@darthbalgarus6986 Having the right of way does not give you permission to ram into people.
@@kgb4187 The collision is purely the fault of the white car. If they didn't arrogantly and selfishly make a blind turn then the crash wouldn't have happened
2:29 A once-in-a-lifetime event. Mustang maneuvering and not losing control. Well-done!
Dodge Charger.
Lmfaoooo literally the only footage ever
@@genesiss4211 Those Dodge Mustangs actually handle pretty good.
@@bills6093 The car the charger ran up on and almost rear ended was a mustang
He didn't crash but he lost control.
1:54 I agree, you had plenty of time to slow/stop but instead, you tried to maneuver around the vehicle. In that much of a hurry that you can't slow down for a few seconds to allow another car to pull out?
4:41 - don't drive in the blind-spot of another vehicle and then rely on the other driver to 'check their blind-spot' before merging over.
1:52 "Video used against me, believe it or not!" Yes, I totally believe it. You had PLENTY of time to brake. Even if the other person is in the wrong, you have a responsibility to do what you can to avoid an accident. I would bet the reason Enterprise agreed to pay was simply to be done with you.
My thoughts too
He swerved into the car. I would've used it against him too.
Yes he failed to take a reasonable precaution; and yes Enterprise gave him a few hundred bucks to make him go away then billed the car renter for it. When I was adjusting I would have ruled 50/50
if you believe cammer's comments, you can see him turn into the vehicle he hit. I don't buy enterprise accepting 100% liability.
Exactly
#26 - I've reported several bus drivers in our local District for that kind of driving. (I also reported one bus that had a diesel leak that was visible on the road. I was acquainted with the bus manager and she was =very= thankful for that one!)
That diesel leak isn't any good for the environment.
“Video used against me, believe it or not!”
Well… yeah. You drove straight into someone.
that tends to happen when you pop out into oncoming traffic without even bothering to look.
Clip #14 you can hear the radio play, “Upset stomach diarrhea” 😂
I love watching these videos 😂😂😂
Ahh,you can always count on a good time when Florida man shows up!😆😆😆
I'm convinced the pickup driver in 14 was suffering from something that was mentioned in that radio ad.
7:58 sooo, are we just gonna ignore them women saying “at the back of my throat… me too cuz I put my head back” 👀😂🤣
Hahahahahaha
Video #1 0:30 - no one should be chasing another driver through urban streets or anywhere for that matter. This "cammer" technically ran a STOP sign. Any vehicle chase puts innocent people - drivers, pedestrians, cyclists at risk for what? To get a minor crash sorted out. Get your priorities straight. It is not worth the chance of injuring someone else to get a licence plate number. ILR Car Control School
I enjoy reading your comments 😊
@@danielmclean9160 Thank you very much. Nice of you to say. ILR Car Control School
@@danielmclean9160 ditto 👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿
@1:53, it is apparent that the cammer not only had enough time to stop but, that he actually turned his steering wheel to intentionally hit the other vehicle.
4:25 dont brake speed up and use the shoulder on the left to get infront of the semi that clearly doesnt see you next to him and remove that thing swinging infront of the dashcam lol
You have to make yourself visible. You can’t just continue to drive in his or hers blind spot. This goes for any vehicle.
@@SiK2tehTouCh he has to turn his head and then he can see the car. And by speeding up anf getting infront he is even more visible ;)
Are you serious with this advice - speed up and use the shoulder? If so, that is some very dangerous advice. That shoulder is not a smooth paved shoulder from what I see and speeding up in definitely NOT the answer. Speeding up and trying to steer on a soft shoulder is a recipe for disaster! They would be much better off simply slowing down and staying behind the truck. ILR Car Control School
@@carcontrolschool To add clarity I was saying for the driver to speed up prior to the semi merging. It he was driving faster and closer to the black car and not in the blind spot of the semi this could have been avoided to begin with.
@@SiK2tehTouCh That's not the answer either. That would put them too close to the vehicle in front. At the start of the video they are already too close to the SUV in front. The best move would to be slow just enough to not be beside the semi. One of our "rules" in defensive driving is to never drive beside another vehicle whenever possible especially trucks. To be clear, your advice says "use the shoulder on the left..." which is definitely not a wise thing to do. ILR Car Control School
I love at 5:14 “what that pepto bismol”😂😂
Hunt that trash down.
“I have you on dashcam. Just so you know!”
Truck: “Who gives a flying rats a….!”
Informative and educational compilation of car crashes.
Honestly....I have to stop watching these videos....my blood pressure goes way up and my heart starts pounding.
Love how in the first video the car ran the RED light and the car filming RAN the RED light! What the ****! This is what life coming too.
I think you mean stop sign not light. The description says the car in front committed a hit and run and cammer was trying to catch them.
There’s always some dash cam clips where the person filming thinks their in the right when their also in the wrong
@@beanbag5433 There's also those who don't read the caption to find out why it happened.
@@kaylapalooza66 So you believe it's OK to drive like a reckless idiot because someone else is?
@@beanbag5433 I will not say I’m in the right in that clip, but she had cut thru lanes of traffic causing me to hit her, and she ran I did not see she was chasing someone. But it’s different POV from happening in person to you seeing it in the video when I ran that stop sign I looked to see if it was safe, I will say it was clear does not mean it was right of me.
Awesome video!
These videos help me realize it’s not just me who sees idiots out driving every day in Florida
Interesting how the cammer in the first clip didn't show any video of the claimed 'offense.' Makes me wonder if this was simple road rage on the part of the cammer..
4:50 - Who saw this one happening?
Experience from watching these vids provides obvious foreshadowing.
2:22 That's what happened when you drive to fast. Am glade wasn't nobody injured or an car accident.
@4:14 it doesn’t matter which insurance carrier you are with. If the damages exceed over the value of the vehicle it’s a total loss. If there’s significant frame damage it’s a total loss. It’s not about which insurance carrier you have. On top of that, you have the option to retain the vehicle.
0:07 yea cause honking your horn will help 😂😂😂
00:30 Can someone translate what the person was trying to convey in that clip description? lol
5:05 Guess all the trucks turning left just be ignoring the open left turn lane? I mean, if you're in a rush, the open lane is probably your best choice.
Yep, that is what they be doing.
Orrrr the second truck is trying to help by getting the plate info from the truck that just hit and ran.
Hello Mega!
4:41 as it is clearly an amazon truck report it to amazon and let them pay for the damage
Amazon TRAILER, Amazon doesn't own trucks or hire drivers. All contractors. So they can't hold responsibility for things like this.
8:27 That was a double lane change, cammer. The "kids" performed the turn correctly.
If there is no other traffic I think you choose your lane as the cammer did here. However, they need to realize the jeep may not expect them to do it.
@@donnash5813 I don't know what jurisdiction you are thinking of, but where I live drivers making a right turn are supposed to enter the rightmost driving lane in the new direction.
@@condorboss3339 You can see other traffic turning at a green arrow so no one else can turn into those lanes so Jeep and cammer can pick their lanes. I do agree and I always turn into the right lane and move over later if I need to do that.
How do you know? Do you live there? Because there wasn't even a dotted line for the so called turn lanes.
At 8:26 mark...i love how people make illegal turns (not turning into the nearest lane) then complain about getting cut off by someone basically doing what they did. Hypocritical
4:41 the semi can't hear the car horn. Plus Grandma and Grandpa hung out in the hammer lane, They decide to camp in blind spot. Maybe it is time for them to go to the old folks home and crash into wheel chairs
Looked like they were leaving a safe following distance from the car in front of them. Semi failed to check blind spots.
That semi knew very well they were there. He speed up next to them. They were keeping up with the cars in front of them and the semi just came over anyways to just push them out of the way.
8:36 you're not supposed to turn wide in a single turn lane, closest lane, then merge. yes they should use a signal to change lanes, but you're not supposed to be there in the first place.
If there is a single turn lane into multiple lanes, you can merge into any lane given that it is open.
@@calilee6894 that's simply not the case, you always turn into the nearest lane. for example, right on red (which is a terrible idea in the first place) you're gonna just pull out into the second lane? yeah great way to get you or somebody else killed.
@@calilee6894 no… you always turn into the closest lane. You need to look and single to continue to move over to the others . Imagine when turning right on a red as the above person noted ….
@@cayk9444 Just because a youtube commenter said it doesn't mean its right.
1. its not illegal, in fact, what we're TAUGHT in driving school is to stop at a red light, make sure its clear, and then you can turn into any lane given that it is safe to do so 2. How is it a danger to turn into an empty lane after i make sure its clear? Nobody has brought up a reasonable answer to that. Y'all are the reason the roads are a mess of road rage, getting mad at nothing.
@@calilee6894 uhhh I didn’t agree with them for fun, I agreed with them because they are CORRECT and have common sense and basic defence driving knowledge. Instead of going off your emotions and feelings of what you think is right because you said so, I encourage you to look up traffic laws.
Where I live the highway traffic act (section 141) literally says you must turn into the lane “that corresponds to the lane from which the turn commenced”. It’s an $85 fine where I live and points taken off if you do not. Not sure what the heck your driving school was teaching, but I learned to turn into the closest lane, as the law expects where I live (this is also the case in most states with a few exceptions, which could be your state possibly). Regardless, it’s just smart driving whether it is the law in a state or not, especially since there are so many hidden intersections, plazas, and side streets.
Clip #19 I didn’t notice the flash at first until I watched it again.
First clip ummm I wouldn’t stop either dude look at how you’re driving just too catch up 😭😂😂🥴
😭 Ik I’m sorry it’s my first situation like this I didn’t know how to act
Typos, "breaks", gibberish. 2:12 "Person only run over by someone running red light". Is "only" supposed to be "nearly"? Proofread, people, proofread.
My home state well represented, Florida Man never disappoints!
School bus really ticked me off.
8:27 The cammer is also at fault. When turning right, one is supposed to turn into the inside (the lane to the farthest right side), NOT lane slide to the outside left lane. Why is this so hard to COMPREHEND.?
5:10 truck skids into car
the radio: 🎶 when you have nausea, hyper-indigestion, upset stomach, *dieeearrheaaa* 🎶
A driver in front of you runs a stop sign so you run one too? Real smart cammer.
1:55 could’ve been completely prevented had you just simply braked. You had plenty of time to put pressure on your brakes. Is it your first time on the road or something?
#13 was being dramatic and ran yourself off the road. 🤦🏻♂️ 😏 🤣
7:50 - I am speechless at the cluelessness here!
5:13.. dude was probably trying to get to the restroom.. He should have followed the guidance of the radio ad. 🤣
1:57 There is some clown named Nerys that is the only guy defending the cammer and he is completely wrong about fault. No one ever found that the cammer wasn't at fault. The cammer hired a lawyer who filed a lawsuit and it was cheaper for Enterprise to settle and pay the repairs rather than hire a lawyer and proceed with litigation. If this case went to trial or subrogation the cammer would be found majority at fault because a reasonable person could have stopped and it appears that the cammer swerved away and then swerved back to hit the other car.
1:56 oh, we believe it.
4:17 somewhat predictable but damn shame cammer couldn't speed up or he will be tailgating & it doesn't help the car in front is actually camping in the passing lane
4:54 Nobody ran you off the road. You moving to the left was your choice as there was plenty of room for that car to get in there. Try using your brake pedal next time instead of the steering wheel.
1:22 - The second horn tap was really helpful.
1:58 - Completely avoidable. No onw "filed a lawsuit". That's tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars when all done and that's far beyond the claim $ by a wide margin. No insurance company would do that.
5:04; really hate when there is no information at the end on something so blatantly malicious.
6:56; van driver should have a tattoo on his forehead, "I'm a failure at brake checking"
Nothing justifies the road rage seen in this video. Time for some deep breaths and calm driving, people.
This one was fairly good'
6:31 Nice to see a clip from my area!
(edit) 8:25 and here's another one, not surprised because i've driven in these exact areas and they're notorious for careless drivers
These types of videos just shows that Florida has the worst drivers ever!!
5:07 What an inpatient driver wow, the lights had only just turned green. I’ve had someone beep at me, when the lights had only just turned green. I just beeped back, that’s just way too impatient the driver of the ute, didn’t even give the other driver a chance to get moving
It looked like the pickup driver deliberately rammed the SUV. No idea why. Possibly raging about something that happened earlier?
@@condorboss3339 I think it’s Just inpatients to be honest, I’ve had people being inpatient at the lights Nothing that dramatic though just beeping
1:20 Bruh you have got to be kidding me 🤦♂
#12 On a two lane road like that, with slower traffic ahead in the right lane, the moment the red semi passed your parents on the right it was obvious what was going to happen. Why would he be speeding up with slow traffic ahead if he wasn't about to cut into the passing lane? I'd advise your parents they need to stay ahead of the semi or drop back and give the semi space to move over. This is to avoid an accident, not defend their right of way.
But but but... The trucker should check his blind spot!
People should ride motorcycles for a while or at least watch DanDanTheFireman. Brakes first, horn second. It's my job to anticipate the problems coming.
@@michaellewis6569 I'm not saying the trucker was right to do that. I'm saying that people need to drive defensively. You should drive expecting other drivers to do stupid things. That way before they do the stupid thing you are already prepared to deal with it in a way that doesn't end with you in a crash or run off the road.
@@flibber123 sorry, first bit was quite sarcastic.
None of the vehicles crashed cause of blind spots..
All they had to do was turn their head.
It is not that hard! Turn your head and LOOK!!
Is no one gonna talk about the flordia driver driving with a hood open and instead opting to stick out his head. Because im dying, flordia is a meme but come on this what flordia is built on.
Sometimes stupid defies all description.
5:05 He was in a hurry to get some Pepto Bismol for his diarrhea.
8:27
The guy was being slow because you are supposed to turn into the far right lane, then move left. You just went to the far lane.
4:25 very good spot to attach camera lmao 😂
5:21 what’s that? pepto bismol upset stomach DIARRHEA 😂
8:04 The things one does when their truck is overheating and they have somewhere to be, lol.
5:07 wtf was that ! Lol
I guess he needed his pepto bismol badly, Lol.
8:26 That's one reason of a few why wide right turns are illegal. The Jeep did that turn properly, just didn't use a signal.
Ok can someone recommend a dashcam? I’m looking to get one but I have no knowledge of the cons and pros. Unsure of the ones I’ve saved on my Amazon list.
4:41 Smail Claims. Sue Amazon for the maximum smail claims you can (varies from state to state - in Michigan it's $5,500). That amount should cover your deductible plus any pain and suffering you may have (even emotional - I still have nightmares from the accident that nearly killed me and that was 6 years ago).
It wouldn't stick since they were in the truckers blindspot (and no, truckers can't check their blindspots as easily as we can in our cars or small trucks) that's why there are signs on the back of semi's and trailers that warns drivers (even with a nifty graphic that shows you) that you shouldn't be there or drive in that area because they can't *see you* and no, drivers shouldn't just outright assume that people are there - if they did that - they'd never get anywhere.
Of course, this is now changing, more and more truckers are installing blindspot cameras in order to make it easier to see if someone is being dumb and staying in that area.
you generally can't sue for non-economic damages in small claims court
@@Suisfonia you have a duty to make sure the lane is clear regardless of what vehicle you're driving. At 4:18, cammer would've been visible in the trucker's blind spot mirror (the one on the nose). At 4:25, trucker should've been able to see cammer in their main side view mirror. And when the cammer was run off the road, trucker would've definitely seen that. Then we have cammer's car horn that trucker completely ignored. Also, it's not dumb to maintain a safe following distance, quite the opposite. If you have a line of traffic in front of and behind you in the left lane, there's a very good chance you have someone beside you. Pop on your turn signal, crack your window and wait a bit. Window is so you can hear a horn, turn signal is to show others what you want to do. As long as I'm not running up on a semi (greater than 20mph difference), I'll them over with a few flashes (high beams during the day, popping headlights on and off during night). This would most definitely stick.
@@harrylook7810 if your emotional pain and suffering is causing you economic damages, such as missing work, then it applies.
@@Suisfonia they weren't in the truckers blind spot! I swear some of you people got a driver's license out of a cracker Jack box. If they were on the right side then they would have been in his blind spot, but on the left side the driver can see clear down to the back of his trailer. Sometimes look things up before you make a comment on it.
5:20 - The commercial was right! That pickup driver must've been suffering from diarrhea if he drives like that!
Probably out the other end.
0:54 - Kinda surprising that the Toyota Prius was not totalled.
3:18 it's a ricer mopar lol 😂
It is scary when even Americans don’t know what side of the road to drive on 🤪
2:55 With so much space in front of them why stay in the blind spot of a 18 wheeler. When they are in the left lane always know they are moving over very soon. I don't ever take any chances next to trucks.
4:20 This is why you don't sit next to a semi on the freeway. Either get next to his cab so he knows you're there or stay back far enough to avoid him if he moves over.
did you not see the car infront of them???
The semi came up to them. The semi knew very well they were there and just didn't care. I would have hunted that person down myself and sue Amazon for that bullshit.
8:51 I don't see where the bus would have "ran a red" as his side would have had the green, but not the arrow, he simply just jumped the turn
If it's a turn on arrow only, then they would have run the red arrow.
@@horseluver4ever623 but you can clearly see it wasn't a red arrow, but a shared red and split green and yellow.
was not expecting to see my apartment in one of these clips skdjfhsd i was like "oh hey that's my city" and then "HEY THAT'S MY APARTMENT"
ETA: everyone seems to have trouble with the intersection outside its so funny to watch sometimes but also terrifying no one knows how to turn properly here
8:27 while they might not have used a turn signal, at least they turned into the correct lane unlike the cammer
4:13 the collision could have been avoided. You had plenty of room on the shoulder and I see you slightly moving over toward the truck. Yes it’s their fault but you could have avoided the damage.
clip 12, 4:17 Lay on your horn, and maintain location, and maintain speed.....is clearly NOT how to handle someone encroaching into your travel lane. Defensive driving skills clearly lacking. Reduce speed, move to the right, and let the truck have the lane since they so clearly want it so desperately. This little passenger car is no match for that 18-wheeler and is going to lose the fight.
4:25 When you saw the truck coming over, why didn't you move over to the shoulder? Did you want to crash your vehicle?