you sir, have never steped through the gates of a university. Experts are experts because they know shit, you dumbfuck, not because of their skin color. The Mexican producing the crack you are obvioulsly on has also more expert knowledge and drug production, even though crack originated as a fun little accident in a german lab.
0:45:41 “In 1959 the Tutsis actually controlled the country with the Hutus being through the Belgians held in submission.” That’s not how it was in 1959. In reality the Tutsi population and the Hutus were both held in submission. This was the reason for the independence demands which emanated from Tutsi people as well, because they were unhappy with the colonial status quo. The colonizers controlled everything. They maintained their rule by means of a military force that included no Rwandans at all. Officers and non-commissioned officers were exclusively Belgian. Lower-ranking soldiers were Belgians for some units and Congolese for others. Those were the soldiers used by the colonizers in 1959 and 1960 to kill Tutsi people. The colonizers wanted Tutsi people dead or expelled precisely because of the latter’s rejection of the colonial status quo. And it is an unquestionable historical fact that the colonizers did kill, deport or expel as much as half the Tutsi population BEFORE independence in late 1962. However in 1960 the Congo became an independent nation. As a result, all Congolese soldiers had to be sent back to their newly independent nation. Since Rwanda’s independence wasn’t granted until 1962, the colonizers still needed an army to replace the departing Congolese. So in 1960, in order to continue killing the surviving Tutsi population, the colonizers formed an exclusively Hutu army as described by its new Belgian chief of staff: "This army will be Hutu, exclusively and openly. We do not want, under the pretext of being fair or democratic, to include even a single Tutsi individual. We shall automatically deem every Tutsi applicant unfit. For being too tall, or too fat or whatever. It may not be fair, but we don't want to mix in any Tutsi people supposedly for the sake of being democratic.” This is quoted from the notes of Major Louis-Francois Vanderstraeten, the Belgian colonial officer who went on to serve as that army’s chief of staff for a long time, *even after Rwanda’s independence.* He was eventually succeeded directly by Juvenal Habyarimana who was put there to continue this anti-Tutsi policy. He was able to do so because of massive support from the regimes in Belgium and France all the way to the 1994 genocide. That’s how the genocidal state was set up. There’s *A DIRECT, UNBROKEN LINK* from the colonizers to Habyarimana to the 1994 genocide.
This is a long, runon sentence with no citation, and, I suspect, a LOT of cherry picking and bias that I also suspect is meant to show off your knowledge and political biases rather than actually proving some kind of a larger point. It was a simple sentence meant to convey similarity of situation, not deeper political nuance.
@@realtsavo Why are you covering for the colonial powers who obviously did create the entire division of hutu and tutsi and the hate between them, and obviously were responsible for the subjugation of the country?
How can you have an ‘expert’ panel discussing the genocide in Rwanda without having even one actual Rwandan on the panel.
What do you expect from Anglos? But oh Spain is so evil huh? Assholes.
I agree, there are issues with this
because they 'know' aaaaall about everything.. lol
To control the narrative in favor of yt people.
you sir, have never steped through the gates of a university. Experts are experts because they know shit, you dumbfuck, not because of their skin color. The Mexican producing the crack you are obvioulsly on has also more expert knowledge and drug production, even though crack originated as a fun little accident in a german lab.
0:45:41 “In 1959 the Tutsis actually controlled the country with the Hutus being through the Belgians held in submission.”
That’s not how it was in 1959. In reality the Tutsi population and the Hutus were both held in submission. This was the reason for the independence demands which emanated from Tutsi people as well, because they were unhappy with the colonial status quo.
The colonizers controlled everything. They maintained their rule by means of a military force that included no Rwandans at all. Officers and non-commissioned officers were exclusively Belgian. Lower-ranking soldiers were Belgians for some units and Congolese for others. Those were the soldiers used by the colonizers in 1959 and 1960 to kill Tutsi people.
The colonizers wanted Tutsi people dead or expelled precisely because of the latter’s rejection of the colonial status quo. And it is an unquestionable historical fact that the colonizers did kill, deport or expel as much as half the Tutsi population BEFORE independence in late 1962.
However in 1960 the Congo became an independent nation. As a result, all Congolese soldiers had to be sent back to their newly independent nation. Since Rwanda’s independence wasn’t granted until 1962, the colonizers still needed an army to replace the departing Congolese.
So in 1960, in order to continue killing the surviving Tutsi population, the colonizers formed an exclusively Hutu army as described by its new Belgian chief of staff:
"This army will be Hutu, exclusively and openly. We do not want, under the pretext of being fair or democratic, to include even a single Tutsi individual. We shall automatically deem every Tutsi applicant unfit. For being too tall, or too fat or whatever. It may not be fair, but we don't want to mix in any Tutsi people supposedly for the sake of being democratic.”
This is quoted from the notes of Major Louis-Francois Vanderstraeten, the Belgian colonial officer who went on to serve as that army’s chief of staff for a long time, *even after Rwanda’s independence.* He was eventually succeeded directly by Juvenal Habyarimana who was put there to continue this anti-Tutsi policy. He was able to do so because of massive support from the regimes in Belgium and France all the way to the 1994 genocide.
That’s how the genocidal state was set up. There’s *A DIRECT, UNBROKEN LINK* from the colonizers to Habyarimana to the 1994 genocide.
Ruton de the murders were for power because knowledge is power abuse still reigns in America the Clintons were in power.
This is a long, runon sentence with no citation, and, I suspect, a LOT of cherry picking and bias that I also suspect is meant to show off your knowledge and political biases rather than actually proving some kind of a larger point. It was a simple sentence meant to convey similarity of situation, not deeper political nuance.
@@realtsavo 👎 he summarizes nearly 50 years, how large should his point be ???
You are a jealous individual !
@@realtsavo Why are you covering for the colonial powers who obviously did create the entire division of hutu and tutsi and the hate between them, and obviously were responsible for the subjugation of the country?
@@jimbob3030 What makes you think I'm covering for anyone?
Who shot president Habyirimana’ s airplane?????!!!!!!
Why???
Lopez Elizabeth Miller Barbara Lee Jose
1:12:01
Lolll who said “shut up”?? That wasn’t Romeo, was it??
Williams Susan Taylor Sharon Walker Edward