From what I heard and in my opinion kilpsch is really good at Lows and Highs but lacks and Mids while Marshall balanced all three and gets much brighter side in delivering sound quality . LISTEN TO INSPIRING Middle East IN THIS VIDEO You’ll notice it! The DRUMS !
Klipsch is solid, monitor style. Compare with source (through my Genelec 8040, 2.0) I think the difference comes from the "effect range". For stand alone Marshall have more "stereo" sound effect, Klipsch is much clean solid sound. It all depends on personal preferennce.
I would rather buy W-King speaker in this case and get similar or better sound in far-far less money, None of these sound good but Klipsch is abysmal.. Perhaps Klipsch speaker creaters forgot there exists a sound frequncy called mid range..
@@seethowaikeng7826 D7: good quality treble with good base. D9: better bass but similar sound profile X10: less sparkle in treble but better mid range and bass than D9 I personally use D7-1 as a tv speaker in my flat. As I prefer the small form factor and sound is very clean and powerful enough for a small living room.
There are speaker for function and there are some for cosmetics all with trade offs so it so subjective for everyone. I’d take the w king for camping but I’d have the klipsch or Marshall for my kitchen cause they look nice as hell
Question! standmore sounds much better, but wait, Im watching this by Klipsch the Three Plus now, so should i say standmore is better or what😂 im serious!! Really😂
There are no words to describe how the Klipsch sounds but one: awful. It's like they were knitted, the sound is wooly and dull. The Marshall is perhaps a little too agressive for my taste, they sound shrill when listening to classical music. But hey, that's not the legacy of the Marshall brand, so no complaints about that. Greetz!
Marshal 1 - Klipsch 0 Marshal doesnt sound 'good' but ok enuff, but the Klipsch are horrible, boomy, hollow and way to bright and hissy at the end. Man of Fire reveals it all and the Sound on the Klipsch there, makes me wanna go puke.
Buy me a coffe: www.buymeacoffee.com/dsaudio.review
Instagram - instagram.com/digitalstereophony/
Facebook - facebook.com/DigitalStereophony/
Klipsh is more clear. I'm going with clipsch. Thanks.
From what I heard and in my opinion kilpsch is really good at Lows and Highs but lacks and Mids while Marshall balanced all three and gets much brighter side in delivering sound quality .
LISTEN TO INSPIRING Middle East IN THIS VIDEO You’ll notice it! The DRUMS !
Marshall for me 100%.
Klipsch is solid, monitor style. Compare with source (through my Genelec 8040, 2.0) I think the difference comes from the "effect range". For stand alone Marshall have more "stereo" sound effect, Klipsch is much clean solid sound. It all depends on personal preferennce.
Nice to see bluetooth speakers here as well!
a lot of texture and tones are missing on the Klipsch. In my opinion The Marshall reproduce more accurately
Man On Fire, who is the performer?
Lots of marshall fanbois here
The stanmore has some tone controls… so turning up the bass and treble a bit, and I bet it would sound almost identifier to the klipsch
👍
Many thanks for this video 👍
Please compare Ayra Pro 5 and Eris e5 xt 🙏🙏
...definitely Marshall
Hi DS, SOUNDSTICKS 4 please.
klipsch is all highs and boomy lows, no mids, hollow sound.
Marshall Stanmore II all the way.
Thanku so much
杰士的人声表现很好
Marshall ! Great !
Klipsch is far more neutral than Marshall. Perfect choice for classical recordings. bun not only.
Mids are really bad on Klipsch, I can barely hear the distorted guitar tone on "Man on Fire".
I would rather buy W-King speaker in this case and get similar or better sound in far-far less money, None of these sound good but Klipsch is abysmal.. Perhaps Klipsch speaker creaters forgot there exists a sound frequncy called mid range..
Which W King model better than these 2?
@@seethowaikeng7826
D7: good quality treble with good base.
D9: better bass but similar sound profile
X10: less sparkle in treble but better mid range and bass than D9
I personally use D7-1 as a tv speaker in my flat. As I prefer the small form factor and sound is very clean and powerful enough for a small living room.
W king speakers ain't going sound better than these the may beat klipsch but i highly doubt their going to beat Marshall
There are speaker for function and there are some for cosmetics all with trade offs so it so subjective for everyone. I’d take the w king for camping but I’d have the klipsch or Marshall for my kitchen cause they look nice as hell
Audio pro c10 mkII
ชอบเสียง Klipsch ใสกว่า
Marshall 💗💗💗💗💗
Question! standmore sounds much better, but wait, Im watching this by Klipsch the Three Plus now, so should i say standmore is better or what😂 im serious!! Really😂
There are no words to describe how the Klipsch sounds but one: awful. It's like they were knitted, the sound is wooly and dull. The Marshall is perhaps a little too agressive for my taste, they sound shrill when listening to classical music. But hey, that's not the legacy of the Marshall brand, so no complaints about that. Greetz!
First my thought as well the Marshall is agressive, but the Marshall is like the band is live in your room, way more natural sound, open and all.
Marshall is better. More neutral, no hiss on highs like in Klipsch.
Yes.
👍
Most of these Bluetooth speakers boost the bass which I find to be really terrible.
Klipsh would look nice on my Klipsh belles
Marshall lacks in Bass, Klipsch sounds more natural, not so crashy.
The Klipsch performs better, except in the high frequencies, as the graph demonstrates
Neither are that great but the Klipsch is an absolute horror.
Marshal 1 - Klipsch 0
Marshal doesnt sound 'good' but ok enuff, but the Klipsch are horrible, boomy, hollow and way to bright and hissy at the end.
Man of Fire reveals it all and the Sound on the Klipsch there, makes me wanna go puke.
Killipsch👌🏼🙂
Oh, that Klipsch is bad!
Masakra, oba kaleczą uszy